Logo

    About this Episode

    Someone cuts you off in traffic or makes fun of your friend and all you can think of is how to get back at them and then some. But wait! Research has found that taking revenge actually makes you feel worse in the long run. Learn about what to do instead.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    🔑 Key Takeaways

    • Seeking revenge may offer temporary relief, but it ultimately perpetuates a never-ending cycle of retaliation and leaves individuals feeling worse afterward.
    • Retaliatory aggression, rooted in evolutionary history, acts as a deterrent and problem-solving mechanism among animals and humans, ensuring survival and resource protection.
    • Understanding the instinctual desire for revenge helps us navigate the tension between our primal instincts and societal expectations in modern society.
    • Seeking revenge may provide temporary satisfaction, but it also poses risks and threatens societal stability. Institutions like courts exist to redirect our revenge instinct and ensure justice is served, leading to personal and societal progress.
    • Revenge is a natural instinct that can override moral codes, and it arises from personal harm and feeling morally wronged. Weak law enforcement and cultures of honor may increase the likelihood of seeking revenge, highlighting the need for systems of justice.
    • Instead of seeking revenge or engaging in physical aggression, focusing on positive distractions and finding healthier coping mechanisms like forgiveness leads to greater happiness and well-being.
    • Revenge, accompanied by the perpetrator's understanding of their wrongdoing, can bring emotional balance and satisfaction to individuals seeking revenge.
    • Seeking revenge only perpetuates negativity and leads to a never-ending cycle of retaliation. Letting go and moving on is the key to finding happiness.
    • Practicing empathy allows us to understand others' perspectives and break the cycle of escalation, promoting forgiveness and creating a more peaceful society.
    • Revenge is tempting, but letting go and choosing compassion leads to personal growth, a better world, and a happier, more peaceful life.

    đź“ť Podcast Summary

    The Destructive Cycle of Revenge

    Revenge may seem satisfying in movies, but in reality, it rarely brings the same sense of gratification. Studies have shown that carrying out acts of Revenge can actually leave individuals feeling worse afterward. The New York Police Department found that 42% of homicides in New York were motivated by Revenge, highlighting the prevalence of this destructive behavior. One problem with Revenge is that it often escalates, leading to a never-ending cycle of retaliation. Additionally, when Revenge is enacted, the person on the receiving end usually feels that the response was disproportionate, fueling further animosity. Ultimately, Revenge may provide temporary relief, but it ultimately plays into societal and evolutionary traps, making it an unfulfilling pursuit.

    Retaliatory Aggression: A Survival Mechanism across Species

    Retaliatory aggression exists not only in the animal kingdom but also in humans. This instinct, rooted in evolutionary history, clashes with the complexities of modern society. Animals, like lionesses defending their food or Reese's monkeys punishing those who act selfishly, use these retaliatory aggressions as deterrents. The punishment serves as a visible warning to prevent future transgressions and protect their resources for survival. While these behaviors may not necessarily involve emotions like revenge, there are instances where animals, like tigers, engage in acts that can only be described as revenge. Humans, too, exhibit traits of revenge, often waiting for the perfect moment to strike back. Ultimately, retaliatory aggression serves as a problem-solving mechanism and a means to ensure survival in various species, including humans.

    The evolutionary roots and complexities of revenge in human society.

    The instinct for retaliatory aggression is deeply ingrained in our DNA due to our hunter-gatherer ancestors' reliance on communication, cooperation, and punishment. As human society evolved, the need for social dependence and monitoring increased, creating an atmosphere of conformity and adherence to norms and rules. Revenge played a crucial role in the development of human civilization, providing a basis for social order and the growth of complex societies. However, while the idea of Revenge may feel rewarding and satisfying, actually carrying it out often leads to negative emotions. The tension arises from our evolved brains, which urge us to seek Revenge despite societal expectations that deem it unacceptable. Ultimately, understanding the complexities of Revenge highlights the unique challenges we face in modern human society.

    The Cost and Benefits of Revenge

    Revenge itself can be risky and even dangerous if carried out, but the feeling of wanting revenge initially can provide a sense of satisfaction. However, seeking revenge on an individual level may leave the group or society as a whole vulnerable to threats from other groups. Society cannot thrive without the knowledge that there are consequences for transgressions. Revenge serves as a costly signal demonstrating risk-taking on behalf of the ingroup and is essential for cooperation between and within groups. However, as we evolved, we developed institutions such as court systems to externalize our revenge instinct and ensure justice is served. These institutions prevent individuals from taking matters into their own hands and punish those who seek revenge outside of the established system. Ultimately, transcending the need for revenge leads to tranquility and evolution as individuals and as a society.

    The complex nature of revenge: instincts, moral codes, and societal factors

    Revenge is deeply rooted in human instincts and moral codes. While moral codes like not cheating on a friend's spouse may prevent us from seeking revenge, the instinct to seek revenge still exists and can override these codes. Psychologist Herbert GTI argues that revenge-seeking behavior arises not only from personal harm but also from feeling morally wronged. Philosophers have debated the purpose of revenge, with some emphasizing its deterrent effect and others emphasizing the moral obligation to punish wrongdoing. It is interesting to note that cultures with a history of weak law enforcement and societies with a culture of honor may be more prone to seeking revenge. Furthermore, revenge can manifest in various settings such as schools and workplaces when individuals feel unheard or mistreated. While revenge may not justify or excuse violent acts, it provides insight into the complex nature of human behavior and the need for systems that address grievances and ensure justice.

    Debunking the Catharsis Myth: How hitting a punching bag may not be the best way to release aggression.

    The idea of catharsis or releasing aggression through physical outlets like hitting a punching bag does not hold up when science is applied. While it was believed that venting anger in this way would offer relief and prevent acts of revenge, studies have shown that it actually prolongs negative feelings and hostility. Research has consistently found that those who engage in rumination or think about seeking revenge while hitting a punching bag are the most angry and hostile afterward. On the other hand, individuals who focus on positive distractions or do not engage in physical aggression are the happiest and least hostile. Therefore, it seems that finding healthier ways to cope, such as forgiving or forgetting, ultimately leads to greater happiness and well-being than seeking revenge.

    The Surprising Effects of Revenge: Finding Emotional Balance through Understanding

    In short, one big takeaway from the studies discussed is that revenge, under certain conditions, can actually make people feel better. German psychologists Mario Goza conducted experiments on comparative suffering and the understanding hypothesis to understand the effects of revenge. The experiments involved research participants who were wronged by their partners in a raffle ticket distribution. When given a chance for revenge, the participants overwhelmingly chose to retaliate and even went beyond the initial wrongdoing. Additionally, the participants were allowed to send notes to their partners explaining their actions. Interestingly, the group that received a note expressing contrition and understanding for their revenge felt more satisfied than those who received an indignant note. This suggests that revenge, combined with the perpetrator's understanding of their wrongdoing, can bring some level of emotional balance and even satisfaction to the individual seeking revenge.

    The never-ending cycle of revenge.

    Seeking revenge may not bring the satisfaction we expect. When we retaliate against someone who wronged us, we often go even further and distribute unfairness. This cycle of revenge creates a never-ending loop, where both parties feel the need to get back at each other. It's like a tit-for-tat scenario that never resolves anything. Research shows that overestimating the impact one act of revenge will have on our future can lead us to take actions that ultimately bring us down, making us feel worse about ourselves. It's important to recognize that anger doesn't follow the rules of other emotions, and indulging in revenge can trap us in negative thoughts and perpetuate the cycle. The better choice is to break free from the urge for revenge, move on, and live a happier life.

    The Power of Empathy in Breaking the Cycle of Revenge and Retaliation

    Empathy can be a powerful tool in overcoming our genetic predispositions for revenge and retaliation. Instead of immediately labeling someone as a "bad person" or seeking revenge when they wrong us, it can be helpful to consider what might have led them to that point. By trying to understand their perspective and what might have caused their behavior, we can break the cycle of escalation and promote forgiveness and understanding. This concept is similar to the doctrine of mutually assured destruction during the Cold War, which emphasized the importance of restraint and the fear of retaliation. Practicing empathy can contribute to a more peaceful and harmonious society.

    The Power of Letting Go and Choosing Compassion

    Revenge is a tempting but destructive path to take. The conversation between Josh and Chuck emphasizes the importance of letting go and moving on from past hurts. They suggest that if revenge is not feasible, it's better not to be too hard on oneself and try again in the future. Taking the high road may be challenging, but it ultimately leads to personal growth and a better world. The hosts share a story about a cursing dentist that reinforces the idea that it's okay to have unconventional traits as long as they do not harm others. The key message is to choose compassion and forgiveness over revenge for a happier and more peaceful life.

    Recent Episodes from Stuff You Should Know

    J. Edgar Hoover: Evil G-Man Pt. 1

    J. Edgar Hoover: Evil G-Man Pt. 1

    It wouldn’t be an overstatement to say that J. Edgar Hoover was perhaps the most powerful American of the 20th century. By the time he established the FBI as America’s police force, presidents were afraid of him. Just exactly how did he get to be so puissant?

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Stuff You Should Know
    enMay 21, 2024

    The Silurian Hypothesis

    The Silurian Hypothesis

    The idea that we aren’t the first advanced civilization to live on Earth sounds like a fringe theory, but it raises a good question: How can we be so sure that a civilization didn’t arise and die on Earth so long ago that any trace of it has been erased?

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Stuff You Should Know
    enMay 16, 2024

    Selects: How Stuttering Works

    Selects: How Stuttering Works

    Despite as much as one percent of the adult population having the condition, science doesn't actually know how stuttering works. The best it's come up with so far: there seems to be an issue between the physical process of speaking and the thought process that underlies it. Find out what science means by this in this classic episode.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Stuff You Should Know
    enMay 11, 2024

    Selects: The Legends of Lost Nazi Gold

    Selects: The Legends of Lost Nazi Gold

    As if being murdering SOBs weren’t enough, the Nazis were also thieving rats. During WWII, they stole billons in gold from countries they overran and moved it to Germany. But at the end of the war, only part of it was recovered. Where’s the rest? Find out the extent of our knowledge in this classic episode.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.