Logo
    Search podcasts and episodes

    Podcast Summary

    • The fallibility of our memories and the influence of narrativesOur memories can be distorted by our thoughts and beliefs, leading to disagreements and conflicting versions of events. It is important to recognize this and be aware of how our preferences shape our recollections.

      Our memories are not always reliable and objective records of past events. They can be influenced and distorted by our thoughts, beliefs, and the stories we tell ourselves. This is evident in the case of the Bologna train station clock, where people's recollections were shaped by the narrative of the bombing rather than the actual facts. We see similar distortions happening in everyday life, from disagreements between friends to conflicting versions of historical events. It's important to recognize the fallibility of our memories and be aware of how preferences and loyalties can shape what we remember and what we forget.

    • The Malleability of MemoryOur memories can be influenced by external factors and are not always reliable representations of past events.

      Our memories are not always reliable or accurate. Elizabeth Loftus experienced two traumatic events in her childhood - her mother's drowning and her house burning down - and her recollection of these events changed over time. She initially believed she had found her mother's body, but later discovered that it was her aunt. Similarly, while she remembered running into her burning house to retrieve encyclopedias, her memory was clear and precise while others who experienced similar events had more vague recollections. This highlights the malleability of memory and the potential for false or distorted memories to form. It serves as a reminder that our memories can be influenced by external factors and are not always a reliable representation of past events.

    • The influence of external factors on our memoriesOur memories can be easily influenced by external factors such as language and photographs, highlighting the importance of critical thinking and questioning the accuracy of our recollections.

      Our memories can be influenced and even manipulated by external factors such as photographs and the way questions are asked. Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist, discovered that people's recollections of car crashes were influenced by the language used to describe the event. For example, using the word "smashed" instead of "hit" lead to higher estimates of the cars' speed. This highlights the power of suggestion and how our memories can be altered based on the information we are exposed to. It also emphasizes the importance of critical thinking and questioning our own memories, as they may not always be accurate representations of past events. Our memories are not as reliable as we might think.

    • The Power of Words: How Question Wording Affects Memory and PerceptionThrough her research, Elizabeth Loftus demonstrates the significant impact that slight variations in question wording can have on an individual's memory, highlighting the importance of unbiased questioning in legal and investigative contexts.

      The way a question is worded can greatly influence a witness's memory and perception of an event. Elizabeth Loftus's research shows that even slight variations in wording can lead people to falsely believe they saw something that never actually occurred. For example, using the word "smashed" instead of "hit" when describing a car accident led more participants to believe they saw broken glass, even when there was none. Similarly, by providing misleading information in a question, such as suggesting the presence of a stop sign instead of a yield sign, people can unknowingly fabricate memories and recall seeing something that was never there. These findings highlight the malleability of human memory and the importance of careful and unbiased questioning in legal and investigative processes.

    • The Complex Nature of Human Memory and Its Impact on Eyewitness TestimonyHuman memory is not an infallible record of events and can be influenced and manipulated. This raises concerns about the reliability of eyewitness testimony and emphasizes the importance of being cautious and skeptical when relying solely on memory-based evidence.

      Human memory is not like a recording device. It is a complex process that involves inference, imagination, and suggestibility. Memories are not just the sum of what we've seen and heard, but also what we think, believe, and want to believe. Our memories can be influenced and manipulated, leading to errors and inaccuracies. This raises questions about the reliability of eyewitness testimony, which is often treated as solid evidence in the criminal justice system. Beth's studies have shown that even confident eyewitnesses can misidentify innocent people based on familiarity or other factors. This highlights the need for caution and skepticism when relying solely on memory-based evidence.

    • The Fallibility of Eyewitness Testimony and the Influence of Memory in Legal CasesEyewitness testimony is not always reliable and can be influenced by memory distortion. Caution should be exercised when relying solely on eyewitness accounts in legal proceedings.

      Eyewitness testimony is not always reliable and can be influenced by various factors. Elizabeth Loftus, a renowned psychologist, highlights the fallibility of memory and its potential impact on legal cases. Loftus came across a murder case where a woman claimed self-defense and was facing prosecution. Through her testimony and research, she emphasized the unreliability of eyewitness accounts. This led to the woman's acquittal and sparked interest from other lawyers seeking Loftus's assistance. Loftus's work expanded to a case involving a man accused of murder based solely on his daughter's repressed memories. Despite the lack of credible scientific evidence for massive repression, the man was convicted. These cases shed light on the potential for false memories and the need for caution when relying on eyewitness testimony.

    • The Power of Suggestion: How False Memories Can Be Implanted in Our MindsOur memories are vulnerable to manipulation, as demonstrated by Elizabeth Loftus' experiment. It is essential to question the reliability of our memories and be aware of the potential for false memories to influence our personal experiences.

      Our memories can be easily manipulated and even false memories can be implanted in our minds. Elizabeth Loftus, a psychologist, conducted an experiment called the Lost In the Mall study where she convinced volunteers that they had gotten lost in a shopping mall as children. Astonishingly, by the third time participants were asked to recall the scenario in detail, about a quarter of them believed and even recalled specific details that were never actually provided. This experiment highlights the power of suggestion and how easily we can be led to believe something that never actually happened. It also raises important questions about the reliability of our memories and the potential for false memories to be present in our personal experiences.

    • Manipulating Memories: The Power of False ImplantationOur memories are susceptible to manipulation, as studies have shown that false memories of bizarre and impossible events can be implanted. This vulnerability can have serious consequences, including wrongful convictions and false accusations.

      Our memories can be easily manipulated and false memories can be implanted into our minds. Elizabeth Loftus and others conducted studies where they successfully planted false memories of bizarre and upsetting events in the minds of ordinary people. They were able to make participants believe they had accidents at weddings, nearly drowned and were rescued by lifeguards, were attacked by vicious animals as children, and even committed serious crimes as teenagers. Loftus also showed that it is possible to plant memories of impossible events, like meeting Bugs Bunny at Disneyland. These studies highlight the vulnerability of our memories and the potential for false memories to be created, leading to significant consequences such as wrongful convictions and false accusations.

    • Defying Skepticism: Elizabeth Loftus Unveils the Fragility of Human MemoryElizabeth Loftus highlights the importance of independent corroboration and challenges prevailing public sentiment to uphold scientific integrity in memory research and expert testimonies.

      Elizabeth Loftus, despite facing criticism and backlash, remained dedicated to her mission of uncovering the fallibility of human memory. She emphasized the need for independent corroboration before asserting the authenticity of traumatic memories. Loftus never saw herself as morally wrong for presenting an alternative perspective, even when it went against public sentiment. Her willingness to serve as an expert witness in controversial cases, including those involving sexual harassment and assault, demonstrates her commitment to upholding the scientific understanding of memory. It is admirable that Loftus carried out her work in memory research and expert testimony, despite her own personal experience with sexual abuse.

    • The unreliability of our memories and the importance of navigating this truthMemories can be influenced, distorted, and even fabricated over time. Recognizing this truth can help us minimize harm and seek ways to fix or combat errors. Developing a nuanced understanding of memory can lead to more accurate perceptions of ourselves and the world.

      Our memories are not as reliable and solid as we may think. Elizabeth Loftus's research shows that memories can be influenced, distorted, and even fabricated over time. This can be unsettling and challenge our belief in our own recollections. However, it's important to recognize this truth about memory and find ways to navigate and cope with it. While mistaken memories can cause harm, understanding the malleability of memory can also help us minimize potential harms and seek ways to fix or combat them. It's crucial to approach cherished memories with caution and be open to the possibility of errors or discrepancies. Ultimately, a nuanced understanding of memory can lead to more accurate perceptions of ourselves and the world around us.

    • The fallibility of memory and its impact on relationshipsOur memories are prone to errors, making it essential to approach disagreements with humility and empathy, recognizing that differing perspectives may stem from distorted or false memories.

      Our memories are not infallible. They can be easily influenced and distorted, leading us to remember things that didn't happen or to forget things that did. While this may seem concerning, it actually offers a valuable lesson in intellectual and moral humility. We should be less confident in our beliefs and more open to the possibility that our memories may not be entirely accurate. Rather than dismissing someone who disagrees with us as a liar, we should consider that they may simply have a false memory. This realization can lead to greater understanding and kindness in our relationships with others.

    Recent Episodes from Hidden Brain

    Innovation 2.0: Do Less

    Innovation 2.0: Do Less

    The human drive to invent new things has led to pathbreaking achievements in medicine, science and society. But our desire to create can keep us from seeing one of the most powerful paths to progress: subtraction. In a favorite conversation from 2022, engineer Leidy Klotz shares how streamlining and simplifying is sometimes the best path to innovation. 

    Today's episode concludes our Innovation 2.0 series. If you've enjoyed these episodes, please tell a friend about them! They can find all of the stories in this series in this podcast feed, or at https://hiddenbrain.org/. Thanks for listening! 

    Hidden Brain
    enMay 27, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: Shortcuts and Speed Bumps

    Innovation 2.0: Shortcuts and Speed Bumps

    Most of us love to brainstorm with colleagues. But so often, our idea-generating sessions don't lead to anything tangible. Teams fill up walls with sticky notes about creative possibilities and suggestions for improvement, but nothing actually gets implemented. Some researchers even have a name for it: "innovation theater." This week, we explore the science of execution. Psychologist Bob Sutton tells us how to move from innovation theater . . . to actual innovation.

    You can find all the episodes in our Innovation 2.0 series in this podcast feed, or on our website, hiddenbrain.org

    Hidden Brain
    enMay 20, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: The Influence You Have

    Innovation 2.0: The Influence You Have

    Think about the last time you asked someone for something. Maybe you were nervous or worried about what the person would think of you. Chances are that you didn’t stop to think about the pressure you were exerting on that person. This week, we continue our Innovation 2.0 series with a 2020 episode about a phenomenon known as as “egocentric bias.” We talk with psychologist Vanessa Bohns about how this bias leads us astray, and how we can use this knowledge to ask for the things we need. 

    Did you catch the first two episodes in our Innovation 2.0 series? You can find them in this podcast feed or on our website. And if you're enjoying this series, please share it with a friend or family member. Thanks! 

    Hidden Brain
    enMay 13, 2024

    Innovation 2.0: Multiplying the Growth Mindset

    Innovation 2.0: Multiplying the Growth Mindset

    Have you ever been in a situation where you felt that people wrote you off? Maybe a teacher suggested you weren't talented enough to take a certain class, or a boss implied that you didn't have the smarts needed to handle a big project. In the latest in our "Innovation 2.0 series," we talk with Mary Murphy, who studies what she calls "cultures of genius." We'll look at how these cultures can keep people and organizations from thriving, and how we can create environments that better foster our growth.

    Do you know someone who'd find the ideas in today's episode to be useful? Please share it with them! And if you liked today's conversation, you might also like these classic Hidden Brain episodes: 

     The Edge Effect

    The Secret to Great Teams

    Dream Jobs

    Innovation 2.0: How Big Ideas Are Born

    Innovation 2.0: How Big Ideas Are Born

    Why is it so hard to guess where we're meant to be? To predict where we'll end up? Nearly all of us have had the experience of traveling down one road, only to realize it's not the road for us. At the University of Virginia, Saras Sarasvathy uses the lens of entrepreneurship to study how we plan and prepare for the future. We kick off our new "Innovation 2.0" series by talking with Saras about how we pursue goals and make decisions.

    Do you know someone who might benefit from our conversation with Saras about expert entrepreneurs? Please share it with them if so! And be sure to check out our other conversations about how to get out of ruts and figure out a path forward: 

    Who Do You Want to Be?

    You 2.0 : How to Break Out of a Rut

    Parents: Keep Out!

    Parents: Keep Out!

    If you're a parent or a teacher, you've probably wondered how to balance play and safety for the kids in your care. You don't want to put children in danger, but you also don't want to rob them of the joy of exploration. This week, we talk with psychologist Peter Gray about how this balance has changed — for parents and children alike — and what we can do about it.

    For more of our reporting on children and parents, check out these classic Hidden Brain episodes:

    Kinder-Gardening

    Bringing Up Baby 

     

    The Curious Science of Cravings

    The Curious Science of Cravings

    We've all had those days when all we want is a little treat. Maybe it's a bag of chips, an ice cream sundae or a glass of wine. But sometimes, these desires become all-consuming. This week on the show, psychiatrist Judson Brewer helps us understand the science of cravings, and how we should respond to them. 

    If you liked today's conversation, be sure to check out other Hidden Brain episodes about ways to regain a feeling of control over your life: Creatures of Habit and Taking Control of Your Time.

    What Is Normal?

    What Is Normal?

    Anthropologist Tom Pearson was devastated after his daughter Michaela was diagnosed with Down syndrome. When he began to examine that emotional response, he found himself wrestling with questions that have roiled his field for decades. Early anthropologists would often compare people of different backgrounds and abilities, asking questions like: How is one group different from another? Which one is stronger or smarter? And how do we understand people who don’t fit our expectations? This week, we talk with Pearson about his family’s story, and the evolution of our thinking on disability and difference.

    If you liked today's show, be sure to check out these classic Hidden Brain episodes:

    "Emma, Carrie, Vivian"

    "Why You're Smarter than You Think"

     

    The Transformative Ideas of Daniel Kahneman

    The Transformative Ideas of Daniel Kahneman

    If you've ever taken an economics class, you were probably taught that people are rational. But about 50 years ago, the psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky began to chip away at this basic assumption. In doing so, they transformed our understanding of human behavior. This week, we remember Kahneman, who recently died at the age of 90, by revisiting our 2018 and 2021 conversations with him. 

    If you enjoyed this look at the work of Daniel Kahneman, you might also enjoy our conversations about behavioral economics with Kahneman's friend and collaborator Richard Thaler: 

    Misbehaving with Richard Thaler 

    Follow the Anomalies 

    Are You Listening?

    Are You Listening?

    Have you ever sat across from your spouse, colleague or friend and realized that while they may be hearing what you're saying, they aren't actually listening? Poor listening can lead to arguments, hurt feelings, and fractured relationships. But the good news is that active, thoughtful listening can profoundly benefit both people in the conversation. This week on the show, psychologist Guy Itzchakov helps us understand where interactions go awry, and how to become a more attentive listener. 

    For more of our work on how to better connect with the people in your life, check out these episodes:

     Why Conversations Go Wrong with Deborah Tannen

    A Secret Source of Connection with Amit Kumar

    Relationships 2.0: What Makes Relationships Thrive with Harry Reis

    Relationships 2.0: How to Keep Conflict from Spiraling with Julia Minson