Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Leveraging specialized platforms for effective hiring and saving moneyIndeed.com helps employers find quality candidates faster, while Rocket Money saves users an average of $720 per year by finding and canceling unwanted subscriptions and monitoring spending.

      For effective hiring and saving money, leveraging specialized platforms can make a significant difference. During the discussion, we learned about Indeed.com, a matching and hiring platform with over 350 million monthly visitors, helping employers find quality candidates faster. On the other hand, Rocket Money is a personal finance app that assists in finding and canceling unwanted subscriptions, monitoring spending, and lowering bills, saving users an average of $720 per year. These platforms streamline processes and provide valuable solutions, allowing us to focus on what truly matters. Additionally, the holiday message from the Blindscape Podcast highlighted the importance of exploring unconventional topics, such as immortality, and the potential implications it holds for individuals, ideas, and society.

    • The reality of true immortalityWhile the universe may be eternal, human consciousness and identity aren't. We exist for a moment in time, not forever.

      True immortality, as we commonly understand it, may not be achievable based on our current understanding of the universe. While the universe itself may be eternal, human consciousness and identity as we know it are not. The information that makes up an individual persists in the universe, but we are constantly changing and evolving, making it more accurate to say that we exist for a moment in time rather than forever. This was a key topic of discussion during a workshop, encouraging participants to confront the concept of immortality and consider what it truly means. Ultimately, we must acknowledge that we live in the macroscopic world, and our identities are defined by the accessible information about us, which comes and goes throughout our lives.

    • Our finite lifespan and memory in the context of psychological continuity and identityThough we can't live forever in the many worlds interpretation, our focus on our present existence and fear of death comes from our awareness of the finite nature of our current life.

      From a macroscopic perspective, human beings have a finite lifespan and memory, despite the constant change we undergo. This concept of psychological continuity and identity over time is essential. Although the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics presents a quantum immortality thought experiment, the overwhelming majority of branches result in death, with only a tiny fraction potentially allowing for immortality. However, these branches count infinitesimally in the many worlds interpretation, making the prospect of immortality an insignificant concern in our everyday lives. The value we place on our current existence and the fear of death stems from the fact that we are aware of our present moment and the possibility of its imminent end.

    • Desire for immortality might not bring solaceInfinite versions of us exist in many worlds, but most don't last forever. Not everyone wants to live for thousands of years, focus on making the most of present time, find joy in learning.

      The desire for immortality, whether it's quantum immortality or living for thousands of years in the real world, might not bring the solace we seek. In the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, there are infinite versions of us, but most of them won't continue to exist forever. Even if we could live for thousands of years in the real world, not everyone wants to, and it's important to consider whether it would be good for us. During a poll at a workshop, a majority of people said they wouldn't want to live for 10,000 years. Instead of focusing on immortality, we might want to focus on making the most of the time we have and finding joy in learning new things, like a new language with Babbel.

    • The downside of immortality: boredom and lack of directionImmortality may lead to boredom and a lack of motivation, as individuals may run out of things to be interested in, contrasting our finite desires and imaginations with the infinite nature of time.

      While the concept of immortality may seem appealing, it could potentially lead to a lack of motivation and enjoyment in life due to the infinite amount of time available. As explored in stories like Jorge Luis Borges' "The Immortals" and Julian Barnes' "Dream," immortality can result in boredom and a lack of direction, as individuals may run out of things to be interested in. The Julian Barnes story also highlights the human condition's inherent finiteness, including our desires and imaginations, which can be contrasted with the infinite nature of time and possibility. Ultimately, even if given the option to live forever, individuals may still choose to end their existence, as demonstrated in both the story and the TV show "The Good Place." The length of time one would want to live remains an interesting question, with some preferring the idea of living for a very long time but not forever.

    • Should we strive for immortality?Society's progress and evolution depend on new generations, questioning the desirability of immortality for individuals and society as a whole.

      Immortality, while intriguing, may not be a desirable goal for society as a whole. Science fiction writer Ted Chiang argued that without the presence of new generations, society could stagnate and fall into a rut. He believed that the evolution of ideas and progress relies on the energy and fresh perspectives of young people. However, it's important to note that there are different forms of immortality - physical and legacy. While we may physically die, our impact on the world can continue long after we're gone. Ultimately, the question of whether we should strive for immortality is complex and requires careful consideration. The podcast discussed the possibility of achieving it, but before delving into that, it's essential to ponder whether we even want it.

    • Honoring the Past and Living in the PresentFocus on living fully and consciously in the present, honor past memories, and consider the implications of extended lifespans and interstellar travel.

      While the concept of immortality is intriguing, it may not be practically achievable for humans as biological organisms. Instead, it's essential to focus on living fully and consciously in the present. Neuroscientist Scott Small's idea of a "ceremony of forgetting" can help us honor the memories of those who have passed while moving forward with life. The extension of human lifespan is a realistic goal, but the extent of it remains uncertain. It's essential to consider the implications of potentially living much longer and recognize that interstellar travel might require lifespans of thousands or even millions of years. Ultimately, the most important thing is to live our lives to the fullest and appreciate the finite time we have on Earth.

    • The universe will eventually reach a state of maximum entropy and emptinessThe universe, including all its complex structures and forms of life, is temporary and will eventually return to a state of maximum entropy and emptiness

      The universe, as we know it, is not permanent. The arrow of time, which drives the development and complexity of living organisms, is a result of the early universe having very low entropy. However, as the universe expands and cools, it continues to approach thermal equilibrium, eventually leading to a high entropy state of empty space. Stars, black holes, galaxies, and all forms of complexity will eventually disappear, leaving nothing but emptiness. This is a natural process, but it serves as a reminder that everything in the universe is temporary. Our current universe, which is approximately 10 to the power of 10 years old, still has plenty of time for exploration and discovery, but eventually, all will come to an end. This concept was explored in a paper by Aidan Chatwin Davis and the speaker, using a definition of entropy that applies to both matter and gravity. The result showed that the universe, with a positive cosmological constant, will eventually empty out and become smooth and featureless, approaching an empty universe with exponentially growing expansion. This is the highest entropy state the universe can be in.

    • The universe's complexity and existence are not eternalThe universe, including life, uses up a finite resource of low entropy energy and is currently in a complex stage, but the rate of star formation and complexity increase is declining, suggesting a finite lifespan

      The universe, including life, uses up a finite resource of low entropy energy to exist and increase in complexity. We are currently in a complex stage of the universe's existence, but the rate of star formation and complexity increase is declining. The universe started simple, flourished, but its interesting life is finite. Physicist Freeman Dyson's 1979 paper "Time Without End" suggested the universe might be open and not last forever. We use energy to live, think, and metabolize, which is a finite resource. The universe's complexity and existence are not eternal, and we are part of this finite process.

    • The limit to infinite life in an expanding universeDespite the potential for infinite existence in an expanding universe, there's a finite limit to the amount of life due to the maximum entropy the universe can reach.

      According to Freeman Dyson's theory, in an expanding and infinite universe, one could potentially live forever by having thoughts that require less and less energy but take more and more time. However, there's a limit to the amount of life that can exist due to the finite entropy of the observable universe. This means that there's a limit to the amount of information that can be processed, and thus, a limit to the amount of life that can exist in the future of our universe. This is because every thought or computation increases the entropy of the universe, and the total entropy of the universe cannot exceed a certain limit. This limit, which is approximately 10 to the power of 122, is the maximum entropy that our observable universe can reach. Therefore, even in an infinite and expanding universe, there's a finite amount of life that can exist.

    • Projected potential for human existenceThe potential for human existence far exceeds the number of lives lived on Earth, with around 10 to the 34 possible human life equivalents if we consider life on Earth until the sun dies and colonize the stars.

      The total entropy production of a human being over a lifetime can be projected into the future, and if we limit ourselves to life on Earth, we have only experienced a small fraction of the potential for human existence. To be precise, the number of human life equivalents that have existed on Earth is around 10 to the 11, but if we consider the potential for life on Earth until the sun dies and if we colonize the stars, the number of human life equivalents that could be experienced is much larger - around 10 to the 34. However, it's important to note that the universe has an upper bound of total entropy, and given that it is moving toward thermal equilibrium, true immortality for human beings or even the human race is not a foreseeable prospect. The universe itself, however, could potentially last forever.

    • Infinite baby universes with temporary lifeThe universe lasts forever but renews itself with infinite baby universes, each with temporary complex systems including life, preventing the burden of an infinite past and maintaining freshness

      Our universe, according to a certain cosmological scenario, lasts forever but most of it is empty and dead. However, there will be infinite instances of baby universes where complex systems, including life, can temporarily exist before returning to their quiescent state. This scenario explains the low entropy of the early universe but also implies that no information is passed between universes, making it the ultimate form of forgetting. In this way, the universe renews itself and maintains freshness while preventing the burden of an infinite past or the ability to impose constraints on the infinite future.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    Change is scary. But sometimes it can all work out for the best. There's no guarantee of that, however, even when the change in question involves the introduction of a powerful new technology. Today's guest, Daron Acemoglu, is a political economist who has long thought about the relationship between economics and political institutions. In his most recent book (with Simon Johnson), Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity, he looks at how technological innovations affect the economic lives of ordinary people. We talk about how such effects are often for the worse, at least to start out, until better institutions are able to eventually spread the benefits more broadly.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/22/283-daron-acemoglu-on-technology-inequality-and-power/

    Daron Acemoglu received a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics. He is currently Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Econometric Society. Among his awards are the John Bates Clark Medal and the Nemmers Prize in Economics. In 2015, he was named the most cited economist of the past 10 years.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    The philosophy of mathematics would be so much easier if it weren't for infinity. The concept seems natural, but taking it seriously opens the door to counterintuitive results. As mathematician and philosopher Joel David Hamkins says in this conversation, when we say that the natural numbers are "0, 1, 2, 3, and so on," that "and so on" is hopelessly vague. We talk about different ways to think about the puzzles of infinity, how they might be resolved, and implications for mathematical realism.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/15/282-joel-david-hamkins-on-puzzles-of-reality-and-infinity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Joel David Hamkins received his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Logic at the University of Notre Dame. He is a pioneer of the idea of the set theory multiverse. He is the top-rated user by reputation score on MathOverflow. He is currently working on The Book of Infinity, to be published by MIT Press.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Welcome to the July 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/08/ama-july-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    281 | Samir Okasha on the Philosophy of Agency and Evolution

    281 | Samir Okasha on the Philosophy of Agency and Evolution

    Just like with physics, in biology it is perfectly possible to do most respectable work without thinking much about philosophy, but there are unmistakably foundational questions where philosophy becomes crucial. When do we say that a collection of matter (or bits) is alive? When does it become an agent, capable of making decisions? What are the origins of morality and altruistic behavior? We talk with one of the world's leading experts, Samir Okasha, about the biggest issues in modern philosophy of biology.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/01/281-samir-okasha-on-the-philosophy-of-agency-and-evolution/

    Samir Okasha received his D.Phil. in Philosophy from the University of Oxford. He is currently Professor of the Philosophy of Science at the University of Bristol. He is a winner of the Lakatos Award for his book Evolution and the Levels of Selection, and is a Fellow of the British Academy.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    280 | François Chollet on Deep Learning and the Meaning of Intelligence

    280 | François Chollet on Deep Learning and the Meaning of Intelligence

    Which is more intelligent, ChatGPT or a 3-year old? Of course this depends on what we mean by "intelligence." A modern LLM is certainly able to answer all sorts of questions that require knowledge far past the capacity of a 3-year old, and even to perform synthetic tasks that seem remarkable to many human grown-ups. But is that really intelligence? François Chollet argues that it is not, and that LLMs are not ever going to be truly "intelligent" in the usual sense -- although other approaches to AI might get there.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/06/24/280-francois-chollet-on-deep-learning-and-the-meaning-of-intelligence/

    François Chollet received his Diplôme d'Ingénieur from École Nationale Supérieure de Techniques Avancées, Paris. He is currently a Senior Staff Engineer at Google. He has been awarded the Global Swiss AI award for breakthroughs in artificial intelligence. He is the author of Deep Learning with Python, and developer of the Keras software library for neural networks. He is the creator of the ARC (Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus) Challenge.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    279 | Ellen Langer on Mindfulness and the Body

    279 | Ellen Langer on Mindfulness and the Body

    For those of us who are not dualists, the mind arises from our physical bodies -- mostly the brain, but the rest of the body has a role to play. And yet it remains tempting to treat the mind as a thing in itself, disconnected from how the body is doing. Ellen Langer is a psychologist who is one of the foremost researchers on the idea of mindfulness -- the cognitive skill of paying to one's thoughts, as well as to one's external environment. Her most recent book is The Mindful Body: Thinking Our Way to Chronic Health. We talk about how our state of mind can effect the functions of our body, sometimes in surprising ways.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/06/17/279-ellen-langer-on-mindfulness-and-the-body/

    Ellen Langer received her Ph.D. in Social and Clinical Psychology from Yale University. She is currently a professor of psychology at Harvard University. She is also an artist with multiple gallery exhibitions. Among her awards are a Guggenheim Fellowship and the Liberty Science Center Genius Award.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    278 | Kieran Healy on the Technology of Ranking People

    278 | Kieran Healy on the Technology of Ranking People

    We claim to love all of our children, friends, and students equally. But perhaps deep down you assign a ranking to them, from favorite to not-so-favorite. Ranking and quantifying people is an irresistible human tendency, and modern technology has made it ubiquitous. In this episode I talk with sociologist Kieran Healy, who has co-authored (with Marion Fourcade) the new book The Ordinal Society, about how our lives are measured and processed by the technological ecosystem around us. We discuss how this has changed how relate to ourselves and the wider world.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/06/10/278-kieran-healy-on-the-technology-of-ranking-people/

    Kieran Healy received his Ph.D. in sociology from Princeton University. He is currently a professor of sociology at Duke University, and a member of the Kenan Institute for Ethics. As an undergraduate at University College Cork he won the Irish Times National Debating competition. He has a longstanding interest in data visualization.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | June 2024

    AMA | June 2024

    Welcome to the June 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with show notes, questions, and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/06/03/ama-jun-2024/


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    277 | Cumrun Vafa on the Universe According to String Theory

    277 | Cumrun Vafa on the Universe According to String Theory

    String theory, the current leading candidate for a theory of quantum gravity as well as other particles and forces, doesn't connect directly to the world we see. It's possible that there is a large landscape of possible states of theory, with the hope that one of them represents our universe. The existence of a landscape implies the existence of a corresponding swampland -- universes that are not compatible with string theory. I talk with Cumrun Vafa, a respected physicist and originator of the swampland program, about how we might use constraints on what kinds of physics are compatible with string theory to make predictions about cosmology and other experimental regimes.

    In the conversation we refer to a famous diagram representing different ten-dimensional string theories, as well as 11-dimensional M-theory, as different limits of an underlying fundamental theory.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/27/277-cumrun-vafa-on-the-universe-according-to-string-theory/

    Cumrun Vafa received his Ph.D. in physics from Princeton University. He is currently Hollis Professor of Mathematicks and Natural Philosophy, and Chair of the Physics Department, at Harvard University. He has done fundamental work on the dynamics of superstrings, the entropy of black holes, F-theory, and other topics. Among his awards are the Breakthrough Prize in Fundamental Physics, the Dirac Medal, and the Dannie Heineman Prize for Mathematical Physics. He is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and the National Academy of Sciences. He is the author of the book Puzzles to Unravel the Universe.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    The Earth's climate keeps changing, largely due to the effects of human activity, and we haven't been doing enough to slow things down. Indeed, over the past year, global temperatures have been higher than ever, and higher than most climate models have predicted. Many of you have probably seen plots like this. Today's guest, Gavin Schmidt, has been a leader in measuring the variations in Earth's climate, modeling its likely future trajectory, and working to get the word out. We talk about the current state of the art, and what to expect for the future.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/20/276-gavin-schmidt-on-measuring-predicting-and-protecting-our-climate/

    Gavin Schmidt received his Ph.D. in applied mathematics from University College London. He is currently Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and an affiliate of the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia University. His research involves both measuring and modeling climate variability. Among his awards are the inaugural Climate Communications Prize of the American Geophysical Union. He is a cofounder of the RealClimate blog.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    43 | Matthew Luczy on the Pleasures of Wine

    43 | Matthew Luczy on the Pleasures of Wine
    Some people never drink wine; for others, it’s an indispensable part of an enjoyable meal. Whatever your personal feelings might be, wine seems to exhibit a degree of complexity and nuance that can be intimidating to the non-expert. Where does that complexity come from, and how can we best approach wine? To answer these questions, we talk to Matthew Luczy, sommelier and wine director at Mélisse, one of the top fine-dining restaurants in the Los Angeles area. Matthew insisted that we actually drink wine rather than just talking about it, so drink we do. Therefore, in a Mindscape first, I recruited a third party to join us and add her own impressions of the tasting: science writer Jennifer Ouellette, who I knew would be available because we’re married to each other. We talk about what makes different wines distinct, the effects of aging, and what’s the right bottle to have with pizza. You are free to drink along at home, with exactly these wines or some other choices, but I think the podcast will be enjoyable whether you do or not. Support Mindscape on Patreon or Paypal. Mattew Luczy is a Certified Sommelier as judged by the Court of Master Sommeliers. He currently works as the Wine Director at Mélisse in Santa Monica, California. He is also active in photography and music. Mélisse home page Personal/photography page Instagram Ask a Somm: When Should I Decant Wine? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation

    25 | David Chalmers on Consciousness, the Hard Problem, and Living in a Simulation
    The "Easy Problems" of consciousness have to do with how the brain takes in information, thinks about it, and turns it into action. The "Hard Problem," on the other hand, is the task of explaining our individual, subjective, first-person experiences of the world. What is it like to be me, rather than someone else? Everyone agrees that the Easy Problems are hard; some people think the Hard Problem is almost impossible, while others think it's pretty easy. Today's guest, David Chalmers, is arguably the leading philosopher of consciousness working today, and the one who coined the phrase "the Hard Problem," as well as proposing the philosophical zombie thought experiment. Recently he has been taking seriously the notion of panpsychism. We talk about these knotty issues (about which we deeply disagree), but also spend some time on the possibility that we live in a computer simulation. Would simulated lives be "real"? (There we agree -- yes they would.) David Chalmers got his Ph.D. from Indiana University working under Douglas Hoftstadter. He is currently University Professor of Philosophy and Neural Science at New York University and co-director of the Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness. He is a fellow of the Australian Academy of Humanities, the Academy of Social Sciences in Australia, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Among his books are The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, The Character of Consciousness, and Constructing the World. He and David Bourget founded the PhilPapers project. Web site NYU Faculty page Wikipedia page PhilPapers page Amazon author page NYU Center for Mind, Brain, and Consciousness TED talk: How do you explain consciousness? See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    18 | Clifford Johnson on What's So Great About Superstring Theory

    18 | Clifford Johnson on What's So Great About Superstring Theory
    String theory is a speculative and highly technical proposal for uniting the known forces of nature, including gravity, under a single quantum-mechanical framework. This doesn't seem like a recipe for creating a lightning rod of controversy, but somehow string theory has become just that. To get to the bottom of why anyone (indeed, a substantial majority of experts in the field) would think that replacing particles with little loops of string was a promising way forward for theoretical physics, I spoke with expert string theorist Clifford Johnson. We talk about the road string theory has taken from a tentative proposal dealing with the strong interactions, through a number of revolutions, to the point it's at today. Also, where all those extra dimensions might have gone. At the end we touch on Clifford's latest project, a graphic novel that he wrote and illustrated about how science is done. Clifford Johnson is a Professor of Physics at the University of Southern California. He received his Ph.D. in mathematics and physics from the University of Southampton. His research area is theoretical physics, focusing on string theory and quantum field theory. He was awarded the Maxwell Medal from the Institute of Physics. Johnson is the author of the technical monograph D-Branes, as well as the graphic novel The Dialogues. Home page Wikipedia page Publications A talk on The Dialogues Asymptotia blog Twitter See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | November 2021

    AMA | November 2021

    Welcome to the November 2021 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). I take the large number of questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable size — based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good — and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | March 2024

    AMA | March 2024

    Welcome to the March 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic.

    Big congrats this month to Ryan Funakoshi, winner of this year's Mindscape Big Picture Scholarship! And enormous, heartfelt thanks to everyone who contributed. We're going to keep doing this in years to come.

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/11/ama-march-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.