Logo
    Search

    3. What Would the World Look Like if Economists Were in Charge?

    en-usMarch 24, 2010

    Podcast Summary

    • The Dilemma of Choosing Between Politicians, Lawyers, and EconomistsWhile politicians and lawyers have low favorability ratings, they still play important roles in government. Economists, often overlooked, offer objective solutions but may not always align with societal expectations. Consider the value of economists in decision-making.

      Americans have an extremely low opinion of politicians and lawyers, with less than 10% and 13% positive ratings respectively. However, politicians and lawyers still fill important government roles, with many US senators and high-ranking officials being lawyers. Economists, on the other hand, are rarely in the spotlight but are characterized by their candidness and data-driven approach. While their solutions may be rational, they may not always align with societal or moral expectations. Despite having valuable ideas, economists are often ignored. This raises the question of whether we should be putting the economists in charge instead of politicians.

    • The Influence of Milton Friedman on Estonia's Economic TransformationThe ideas of economists can have a positive impact on a country's economy, regardless of who implements them. Estonia's success with the flat tax and free-market principles can serve as a model for other countries striving for economic growth.

      Mart Laar, the former Prime Minister of Estonia who helped transform the country from a former Soviet satellite to a prosperous economy, attributes his success to the ideas of economist Milton Friedman. Although Laar was not an economist himself, he was influenced by Friedman's book Free to Choose and implemented many of his ideas, including the flat tax, which was met with skepticism but ultimately proved successful. Laar's decision to follow Friedman's ideas demonstrates the power and impact of good ideas, regardless of who implements them. By implementing free-market principles, Estonia was able to become a Baltic Tiger and serve as a model for other countries looking to promote economic growth and prosperity.

    • The Rise of Economists in Politics: A Radical IdeologyEconomists are gaining traction in politics and pushing for radical changes like legalizing drugs, prostitution and abolishing minimum wage. They believe in individual freedom and removing government control from people's lives.

      Economists, with their radical ideas, are slowly becoming popular. With more than 30 countries having elected officials with an economics background, it's time America dreamt big too. What if we gave the keys to the Oval Office to a real-life, practicing economist, full of good ideas? Economist Russ Roberts suggests abolishing minimum wage, legalizing all drugs and prostitution, and cutting the Department of Education. Roberts believes the government should not dictate what people do with their lives; they should have the freedom to make their own choices. Legalizing drugs and prostitution would free up millions, which are currently wasted trying to keep them out of people's hands.

    • The Truth About High-End Escort Services and Legalizing ProstitutionClients pay for companionship, not just sex acts and legalizing prostitution may lower prices but societal perception is a barrier for women. Economist Russ Roberts believes in changing the Federal Reserve for better outcomes.

      A former high-end call girl reveals that clients pay for companionship and relaxation, rather than crazy sex acts. Legalizing prostitution may result in lower prices and more competition, but the barriers to entry for women to get into the business are values and societal perception rather than costs. A nation run by economists would mean less government moral judgments, potentially leading to the end of values voters. Economist Russ Roberts would change the Federal Reserve, believing that finding the right interest rate is a fool's game that contributed to the current crisis.

    • The Role of Economists in Government and the Case for Businessmen-Led GovernanceEconomists advocate for less government involvement in the economy, with deregulation and federalism as key changes. Businessmen-led governance could lead to market competition and experiments with different types of societies.

      The interview discusses the role of economists in government, with the suggestion that businessmen should be in charge of government in order to allow market competition between different countries and societies. The interviewee believes that the government should be less involved in the economy, with deregulation and federalism being key changes that would occur. The discussion also mentions the influence of Milton Friedman on modern ideas and policies, with references to tax withholding, school vouchers, and a volunteer army. The interview highlights the potential benefits of experimentation with different types of societies, as with seasteading. Overall, the discussion suggests that economist-led government could result in significant changes to policy and regulation.

    • The Power of Incentives: Can They Be Beaten?While incentive schemes may not always work as expected, economists' ideas and concepts still hold valuable insight into human behavior and decision-making.

      The defenestration of economists in Washington is due to the unpopularity of economically sound ideas in a super-partisan government with no real competition. However, economists' favorite tool, the power of incentives, may not always work as expected, as seen in the cautionary tale of Steve Levitt and his daughter. This raises the question of whether incentive schemes proposed by economists can be beaten by individuals and even larger groups. Nevertheless, it is still important to have faith in the ideas of economists, as they may hold solutions to complex problems that require the expertise in economics. Incentive schemes may not always be foolproof, but the concepts behind them can still provide valuable insight into human behavior and decision-making.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    598. Is Overconsolidation a Threat to Democracy?

    598. Is Overconsolidation a Threat to Democracy?

    That’s the worry. Even the humble eyeglass industry is dominated by a single firm. 

    We look into the global spike in myopia, how the Lemtosh got its name, and what your eye doctor knows that you don’t. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Maria Liu, professor of clinical optometry at the University of California, Berkeley.
      • Harvey Moscot, C.E.O. of MOSCOT Eyewear and Eyecare.
      • Zachary Moscot, chief design officer of MOSCOT Eyewear and Eyecare.
      • Cédric Rossi, equity research analyst at Bryan Garnier.
      • Tim Wu, professor of law, science and technology at Columbia Law School.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 25, 2024

    597. Why Do Your Eyeglasses Cost $1,000?

    597. Why Do Your Eyeglasses Cost $1,000?

    A single company, EssilorLuxottica, owns so much of the eyewear industry that it’s hard to escape their gravitational pull — or their “obscene” markups. Should regulators do something? Can Warby Parker steal market share? And how did Ray-Bans become a luxury brand? (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Neil Blumenthal, co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker.
      • Dave Gilboa, co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker.
      • Jessica Glasscock, fashion historian and lecturer at the Parsons School of Design.
      • Neil Handley, curator of the British Optical Association Museum at the College of Optometrists.
      • Ryan McDevitt, professor of economics at Duke University.
      • Cédric Rossi, equity research analyst at Bryan Garnier.
      • Tim Wu, professor of law, science and technology at Columbia Law School.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 18, 2024

    EXTRA: People Aren’t Dumb. The World Is Hard. (Update)

    EXTRA: People Aren’t Dumb. The World Is Hard. (Update)

    You wouldn’t think you could win a Nobel Prize for showing that humans tend to make irrational decisions. But that’s what Richard Thaler has done. In an interview from 2018, the founder of behavioral economics describes his unlikely route to success; his reputation for being lazy; and his efforts to fix the world — one nudge at a time.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 15, 2024

    596. Farewell to a Generational Talent

    596. Farewell to a Generational Talent

    Daniel Kahneman left his mark on academia (and the real world) in countless ways. A group of his friends and colleagues recently gathered in Chicago to reflect on this legacy — and we were there, with microphones.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Maya Bar-Hillel, professor emeritus of psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
      • Shane Frederick, professor of marketing at the Yale School of Management.
      • Thomas Gilovich, professor of psychology at Cornell University.
      • Matt Killingsworth, senior fellow at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Barbara Mellers, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eldar Shafir, director of the Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science & Public Policy at Princeton University.
      • Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 11, 2024

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    American politics is trapped in a duopoly, with two all-powerful parties colluding to stifle competition. We revisit a 2018 episode to explain how the political industry works, and talk to a reformer (and former presidential candidate) who is pushing for change.

     

    • SOURCES:

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 04, 2024

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    It’s hard to know whether the benefits of hiring a celebrity are worth the risk. We dig into one gruesome story of an endorsement gone wrong, and find a surprising result.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • John Cawley, professor of economics at Cornell University.
      • Elizabeth (Zab) Johnson, executive director and senior fellow with the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Alvin Roth, professor of economics at Stanford University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 27, 2024

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    Broadway operates on a winner-take-most business model. A runaway hit like Stereophonic — which just won five Tony Awards — will create a few big winners. But even the stars of the show will have to go elsewhere to make real money. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 20, 2024

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    The Berlin dance mecca Berghain is known for its eight-hour line and inscrutable door policy. PJ Vogt, host of the podcast Search Engine, joins us to crack the code. It has to do with Cold War rivalries, German tax law, and one very talented bouncer.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Lutz Leichsenring, executive board member of Clubcommission Berlin and co-founder of VibeLab.
      • PJ Vogt, reporter, writer, and host of the podcast Search Engine.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 17, 2024

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    Hit by Covid, runaway costs, and a zillion streams of competition, serious theater is in serious trouble. A new hit play called Stereophonic — the most Tony-nominated play in history — has something to say about that. We speak with the people who make it happen every night. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 13, 2024

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    Every December, a British man named Tom Whitwell publishes a list of 52 things he’s learned that year. These fascinating facts reveal the spectrum of human behavior, from fraud and hypocrisy to Whitwell’s steadfast belief in progress. Should we also believe?

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 06, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Episode 300- Ones And Zeros

    Episode 300- Ones And Zeros

    www.commsolutionsmn.com- We’re back with season 8, and we’re off to a raging start. We’re going after an issue that seems like a national issue, but it really doesn’t get more local than what’s in your wallet. The Federal Reserve has been talking about issuing a new currency… a progammmable digital-based currency.

    This isn’t the first time a new US currency has been implemented. Most times the American consumer got the short end of the stick on the conversion. This new currency will no longer have physical money, but will be completely digital and run through the Federal Reserve system. This will have huge implications for you, because the Fed will be able to track and trace every dollar you earn, invest, and spend.

    This currency will be programmable, which means that they can control how you use your money. All they have to do is program the restrictions on your account to allow you buy certain things or not, spend your money somewhere or not, or donate to a certain organization or not. The Chinese are already putting parts of this in place with their social credit system. The World Economic Forum has already lauded China as the gold standard.

    President Biden has already tasked the government with designing this currency, creating the programmable technology, and laying uot a plan for implementation. It’s all ready to go, now we’re just waiting for an economic emergency. At some point, things will crash and they will step in with this ready-made solution.

    Check out the Community Solutions Podcast on your mobile device’s podcast app or click on the button for other options.

    Spotlight: Democrats’ Proposed Tax Hike Is Reckless And Not The Solution To Inflation

    Spotlight: Democrats’ Proposed Tax Hike Is Reckless And Not The Solution To Inflation

    Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has unveiled his solution to help fight inflation: significant tax increases. Steve Forbes on why the Democrats’ proposed tax hike is reckless and is not the answer to inflation.

    Steve Forbes shares his What’s Ahead Spotlights each Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    EP148 - When the central planners get things wrong

    EP148 - When the central planners get things wrong

    Life is complicated. Surely, you cant be expected to manage your own life, right? You deserve the benefits of just showing up where every child wins a prize. And why not? Your central planners have got your back and know what is good for you. These are cynical statements, if you didnt know that already. But in this episode lets just illuminate why putting your faith & trust in counterparties to have your back doesnt work out well particularly when they are the US Federal Reserve.

    EP148 - When the central planners get things wrong

    EP148 - When the central planners get things wrong

    Life is complicated. Surely, you cant be expected to manage your own life, right? You deserve the benefits of just showing up where every child wins a prize. And why not? Your central planners have got your back and know what is good for you. These are cynical statements, if you didnt know that already. But in this episode lets just illuminate why putting your faith & trust in counterparties to have your back doesnt work out well particularly when they are the US Federal Reserve.

    EP148 - When the central planners get things wrong

    EP148 - When the central planners get things wrong

    Life is complicated. Surely, you cant be expected to manage your own life, right? You deserve the benefits of just showing up where every child wins a prize. And why not? Your central planners have got your back and know what is good for you. These are cynical statements, if you didnt know that already. But in this episode lets just illuminate why putting your faith & trust in counterparties to have your back doesnt work out well particularly when they are the US Federal Reserve.