Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Passionate Spirit of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia's reputation for sports booing doesn't define its overall spirit - the city has a history of challenging the status quo and fighting for progress.

      Philadelphia is known for being the capital of sports booing, where passionate fans will boo lack of effort, opposing players, and even Santa Claus. The infamous Santa Claus booing incident of 1968 at Franklin Field involved a scrawny-looking Santa named Frank Olivo, who actually said he would've done the same thing himself if he wasn't on the field. Despite its reputation for boisterous fans, Philadelphia has an important legacy as the cradle of the political part of the Revolution, with historical dissidents such as Thomas Paine. This suggests that Philly's famed passionate spirit isn't limited to sports, but has a deep-seated tradition of challenging the status quo and fighting for a better future.

    • The Decline of Booing: What it Says About Audience Participation TodayBooing may be seen as disrespectful, but it is also a reminder of the power of the people and their right to express public opinion. As technology advances, we must consider the importance of active audience participation in society.

      In Thomas Paine's time, audiences were expected to react and interact during public speeches and theatrical performances, exhibiting huzzahs and boos. However, today, booing has declined in popularity except in sports. Though booing can be considered vandalism, it is an expression of democracy. Robert Lipsyte, a writer for The New York Times, notes that booing is a reminder of audience sovereignty and the power of the people. It is an expression of public opinion. As we move towards a more digitized world, it begs the question of whether we have lost the tradition of active audience participation and expression.

    • To Boo or Not to Boo: Critiquing Park and Bark Opera PerformancesBooing may not be polite, but it can provide useful feedback to performers and express audience frustration with a lackluster show. It's up to the individual to decide whether or not to boo.

      Opera singers who lack acting abilities and simply stand and sing, known as 'park and bark' performers, can be disappointing to watch, especially when they don't put in their best effort during their final performances. Despite this, some audiences may still refrain from booing, even if it's warranted. However, some individuals, like theater critic Terry Teachout, feel compelled to express their disappointment through boos when they feel a performance hasn't met their expectations. While booing may not be the most polite form of criticism, it can provide feedback to performers and convey the audience's frustration with a subpar show.

    • Exploring the Psychology of Booing in Broadway and Other VenuesThe high cost of Broadway tickets and the endowment effect might explain the absence of booing. However, audience demand characteristics and occasional booing can indicate authenticity and passion from the audience.

      The absence of booing on Broadway might be attributed to the high cost of tickets, as people feel obliged to make the most of the substantial investment they make. The endowment effect, where the value of something increases simply because it belongs to us, might also be at play. However, the fact that people boo in other venues, such as opera houses, suggests that demand characteristics of the situation might be shaping audience response. Theatre critic, Terry Teachout, suggests that occasional booing might actually be encouraging, as it would indicate a sense of authenticity and passion from the audience.

    • The Potency of Silent Boos for Audience FeedbackSilent booing can provide a cathartic outlet for expressing feelings about a show while still giving valuable feedback to producers. Booing shows that audiences care about quality performances and have high expectations.

      The idea of using a silent boo to express dissatisfaction with a performance has been suggested as an alternative to full-scale incivility, such as throwing tomatoes. Some argue that checking a box on a customer satisfaction survey does not have the same visceral impact as booing, but the silent boo could provide a cathartic outlet for expressing feelings about a show. It could even supply useful information to the producers of the show. Nonetheless, booing is viewed as a natural expression of frustration and disappointment when a performance does not meet expectations. The fact that audience members have high expectations and are willing to boo shows that they care about the quality of the performance.

    • The Art of Embracing Constructive CriticismGetting booed may hurt, but it's an opportunity to learn and improve. Being open to constructive feedback is essential for success, regardless of your level of expertise.

      If you've made it to the big leagues, getting booed may come with the territory. This is true in any industry, including entertainment. Amateur performers on the other hand, don't usually get booed because the audience knows they are not professionals. However, at the legendary Apollo Theatre in Harlem, even amateurs can get harshly critiqued. If the audience doesn't like an act, they can vote with their voices, and the Executioner will come and remove them from the stage. Getting booed can be a painful experience, but it can also be an opportunity to learn and grow. Embracing constructive criticism is key to success, whether you are a professional or an amateur.

    • The Art of Booing: Rules and ContextsBooing can express dissatisfaction and engagement in a democratic society, but it's essential to use it thoughtfully and respectfully. Good-natured booing is allowed, but it's important to know the rules in different contexts and handle it as a politician.

      Booing is an art form that has different rules in different contexts. At the Apollo, it's not okay to boo kids, but it's acceptable to boo in the name of Jesus or to some politicians. Good-natured booing is always allowed, especially towards popular politicians. Ed Rendell, a former governor of Pennsylvania, has shared his rules for booing, including the importance of knowing how to handle booing as a politician. Booing can be an expression of dissatisfaction, but it can also be a form of engagement and participation in a democratic society. Whether online or in-person, booing can have consequences, and it's essential to use it thoughtfully and respectfully.

    • Turning Booing into an AdvantageResponding to booing with humor or a clever comeback can help turn a negative situation into a positive one. Marginalizing the booers can also make the audience rally behind the speaker or athlete.

      In political speeches, responding to booing can turn the situation around like how George Bush the elder did in a Michael Dukakis debate in 1988. By marginalizing the booers and characterizing them as not representing the majority, a speaker can turn an episode of booing into a supportive episode of applause. Similarly, Johnnie LeMaster turned booing into a supportive episode during his Major League Baseball career when he hit a game-winning home run after being booed by the crowd. These examples show that responding to booing with humor or a clever comeback can help a speaker or athlete gain the upper hand and turn the situation around. Such reactions demonstrate that seemingly negative situations can be turned into positive outcomes with a little creativity and strategic thinking.

    • Johnnie LeMaster on the Painful Experience of Being Booed by Home CrowdAthletes strive to please their fans, but booing can snowball and hurt terribly. They make mistakes and are vulnerable to criticism like everyone else.

      Johnnie LeMaster, a former baseball player, shares his experience of being booed by his home crowd during a rough patch with the Giants. He explains how an athlete wants to please his fans the most, but once booing starts, it snowballs, and it hurts incredibly bad. LeMaster acknowledges that he may have added fuel to the fire by making a few errors and saying things in the newspapers that he shouldn't have said. However, he believes that people are fickle, and once something gets started, it's tough to stop. It's a reminder that athletes, like everyone else, make mistakes and are susceptible to criticism from others.

    • The Power of Creativity in Overcoming BacklashWhen faced with criticism, using creativity to connect with others can turn a challenge into an opportunity for understanding. Take a cue from Johnnie LeMaster, who turned boos into cheers with a simple act of self-expression.

      Johnnie LeMaster, a baseball player in San Francisco, faced backlash from fans after expressing conservative views on homosexuality. In response, LeMaster made a jersey with 'Boo' on the back, worn as a way for fans to cheer him instead of booing him. The move got the fans and media off his back and became a lasting legacy, still talked about thirty years later. The incident highlights the power of creativity in navigating challenges and turning them into opportunities for connection and understanding.

    • The Power of Booing and Kind WordsNegative reactions can be a sign of success and kind words from respected individuals have the power to inspire and uplift us.

      Reggie Jackson, the famous baseball player, once told a fellow player who was being booed, 'people don’t boo nobodies.' This simple phrase had a profound impact on the player and made him feel like a million bucks. What can we learn from this story? Perhaps it’s that negative reactions, such as booing, can actually be a sign of success rather than failure. Maybe it’s that a few kind words from a respected individual can make all the difference in someone’s day, week, or even life. Ultimately, there may not be a grand theory behind booing, but the stories that surround it have the power to inspire and uplift us.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    The Berlin dance mecca Berghain is known for its eight-hour line and inscrutable door policy. PJ Vogt, host of the podcast Search Engine, joins us to crack the code. It has to do with Cold War rivalries, German tax law, and one very talented bouncer.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Lutz Leichsenring, executive board member of Clubcommission Berlin and co-founder of VibeLab.
      • PJ Vogt, reporter, writer, and host of the podcast Search Engine.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 17, 2024

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    Hit by Covid, runaway costs, and a zillion streams of competition, serious theater is in serious trouble. A new hit play called Stereophonic — the most Tony-nominated play in history — has something to say about that. We speak with the people who make it happen every night. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 13, 2024

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    Every December, a British man named Tom Whitwell publishes a list of 52 things he’s learned that year. These fascinating facts reveal the spectrum of human behavior, from fraud and hypocrisy to Whitwell’s steadfast belief in progress. Should we also believe?

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 06, 2024

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    An update of our 2020 series, in which we spoke with physicians, researchers, and addicts about the root causes of the crisis — and the tension between abstinence and harm reduction.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Gail D’Onofrio, professor and chair of emergency medicine at the Yale School of Medicine and chief of emergency services at Yale-New Haven Health.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Nicole O’Donnell, certified recovery specialist at the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy.
      • Jeanmarie Perrone, professor of emergency medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eileen Richardson, restaurant manager.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 03, 2024

    590. Can $55 Billion End the Opioid Epidemic?

    590. Can $55 Billion End the Opioid Epidemic?

    Thanks to legal settlements with drug makers and distributors, states have plenty of money to boost prevention and treatment. Will it work? (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Christine Minhee, founder of OpioidSettlementTracker.com.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 30, 2024

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    Most epidemics flare up, do their damage, and fade away. This one has been raging for almost 30 years. To find out why, it’s time to ask some uncomfortable questions. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • David Cutler, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Travis Donahoe, professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 23, 2024

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Presenting two stories from The Economics of Everyday Things: Why does it seem like every car is black, white, or gray these days? And: How self-storage took over America.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Tom Crockett, classic car enthusiast.
      • Zachary Dickens, executive vice president and chief investment officer of Extra Space Storage.
      • Mark Gutjahr, global head of design at BASF.
      • Kara Kolodziej, self-storage unit tenant.
      • Anne Mari DeCoster, self-storage consultant.
      • Nikkie Riedel, carline planning manager at Subaru of America.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 20, 2024

    588. Confessions of a Black Conservative

    588. Confessions of a Black Conservative

    The economist and social critic Glenn Loury has led a remarkably turbulent life, both professionally and personally. In a new memoir, he has chosen to reveal just about everything. Why?

     

    • SOURCE:
      • Glenn Loury, professor of economics at Brown University and host of The Glenn Show.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 16, 2024

    587. Should Companies Be Owned by Their Workers?

    587. Should Companies Be Owned by Their Workers?

    The employee ownership movement is growing, and one of its biggest champions is also a private equity heavyweight. Is this meaningful change, or just window dressing?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Marjorie Kelly, distinguished senior fellow at The Democracy Collaborative.
      • Corey Rosen, founder and senior staff member of the National Center for Employee Ownership.
      • Pete Stavros, co-head of Global Private Equity at KKR.

     

     

    586. How Does the Lost World of Vienna Still Shape Our Lives?

    586. How Does the Lost World of Vienna Still Shape Our Lives?

    From politics and economics to psychology and the arts, many of the modern ideas we take for granted emerged a century ago from a single European capital. In this episode of the Freakonomics Radio Book Club, the historian Richard Cockett explores all those ideas — and how the arrival of fascism can ruin in a few years what took generations to build.

     

     

     

    Related Episodes

    Can Democrats Turn Their 2022 Around?

    Can Democrats Turn Their 2022 Around?

    With the midterms just over six months away, the electoral prospects for Democrats are looking bleak. President Biden’s approval rating is at 42 percent, around where Donald Trump’s was at this point in his presidency. Recent polls asking whether Americans want Republicans or Democrats in Congress found that Republicans are leading by about 2 percentage points. And with inflation spiking to its highest point in decades, Covid cases rising and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine continuing to send economic and humanitarian shock waves across the globe, things don’t look as if they are going to get better anytime soon.

    What will it take for Democrats to turn things around? What fights should they be picking with Republicans, and how should they be making the case that they deserve another chance at leading the country?

    Sean McElwee is a co-founder and the executive director of Data for Progress, a research organization that gathers polling data to strategize on behalf of progressive causes and policies. Anat Shenker-Osorio is a principal at ASO Communications, a political communications firm that conducts analytic and empirical research to help progressive political campaigns. She also hosts the “Words to Win By” podcast. McElwee and Shenker-Osorio have deeply influenced my thinking on how words work in American politics: how campaigns can meaningfully address what voters want and how they can persuade swing voters and motivate the party’s base.

    In this conversation, McElwee and Shenker-Osorio help me understand where Democrats stand with the electorate and what, if anything, they can do to improve their chances in 2022. We discuss why Biden’s approval rating is so low, given the popularity of his policies, why governing parties so often lose midterm elections, whether Democrats should focus more on persuading swing voters or on mobilizing their base, why it’s important for Democrats to get their base to sing from the same songbook, what Democrats can learn from Trump about winning voters’ attention, how Republicans are running politics on easy mode, whether it was wise politically for Biden to double down on the message to fund the police, what political fights Democrats should pick in the lead-up to the midterms, how the party should handle spiking inflation and more.

    Mentioned:

    "Democrats, Here's How to Lose in 2022. And Deserve It." by Ezra Klein

    Book recommendations:

    Anat Shenker-Osorio

    A Theory of System Justification by John T. Jost

    Memorial by Bryan Washington

    These Precious Days by Ann Patchett

    Sean McElwee

    The Course by Ed Miller

    The Precipice by Toby Ord

    The Climate War by Eric Pooley

    Thoughts? Guest suggestions? Email us at ezrakleinshow@nytimes.com.

    You can find transcripts (posted midday) and more episodes of “The Ezra Klein Show” at nytimes.com/ezra-klein-podcast, and you can find Ezra on Twitter @ezraklein. Book recommendations from all our guests are listed at https://www.nytimes.com/article/ezra-klein-show-book-recs.

    “The Ezra Klein Show” is produced by Annie Galvin, Jeff Geld and Rogé Karma; fact-checking by Michelle Harris and Kate Sinclair; original music by Isaac Jones; mixing by Jeff Geld; audience strategy by Shannon Busta. Our executive producer is Irene Noguchi. Special thanks to Kristin Lin and Kristina Samulewski.

    Feedback Mastery: Navigating the Path to Peak Performance Together

    Feedback Mastery: Navigating the Path to Peak Performance Together

    In this episode, Hayley and Greguyschka discuss their journey with constructive feedback. The conversation explores effective strategies for addressing underperforming employees, emphasizing the importance of understanding individual personalities, creating a positive emotional space, proactively identifying underlying issues, and practicing active listening during feedback sessions.

     Today you'll be learning the following:

    • Personalized Feedback Approach: Tailor feedback by understanding individual personalities and how they process feedback.
    • Emotional Preparation: Prioritize a positive mental and emotional environment for both parties before giving feedback.
    • Proactive Problem-solving: Identify and address underlying issues, not just symptoms, for more effective resolutions.
    • Root Cause Resolution: Address underlying issues for effective problem-solving.

     1:19 Hayley shares her experience with constructive feedback

    3:43 How would you handle a conversation with an employee who has been underperforming?

    12:02 Get to know the personality of the person, understand how they take feedback and how they reflect.

    15:26 Ensure both the employer(you) and the employee are in a good mental and emotional space before giving feedback

    15:34 Before the meeting identify the underlying issue not just the symptom

    17:59 Listen actively not passively

    Resources: 

    • Visit our website here
    • Download Greguyschka & Hayley’s top 10 Strategies to help women regain confidence at work. Sign up here to get your copy.

    Connect with Greguyschka & Hayley

    • Follow Greguyschka on LinkedIn here.
    • Follow Hayley on LinkedIn here.
    • Check out Hayley's bestselling book here.

    Why do newspaper endorsements still matter?

    Why do newspaper endorsements still matter?

    Have the newspapers decided who they are going to back at the next general election and if they have will it actually have any impact? The New Statesman’s media correspondent, Will Turvill, joins Rachel Cunliffe to discuss his research into the main papers’ editorials to understand what they might say at the next election and why it still matters.


    They talk about how endorsements can set the broadcast media agenda, if papers follow readers or lead them – and why Murdoch was unhappy about the “Sun Wot Won It” headline in 1992.


    Subscripe to Morning Call



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.