Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • COVID-19 Pandemic Causes Unprecedented Demand and Long Lead Times for Distribution TransformersThe COVID-19 pandemic caused global supply chain disruptions, leading to increased demand for electrical equipment and prolonged lead times for distribution transformers, making it challenging for startups and other projects to plan and execute on shorter time scales.

      The transformer market, specifically the distribution transformer sector, has experienced unprecedented demand and prolonged lead times since the COVID-19 pandemic. Prior to the crisis, typical lead times for these transformers were much shorter. The shift began when the global supply chain disruptions caused by the pandemic led to increased demand for electrical equipment, particularly transformers. The power generation industry, real estate sector, and startups have all been impacted by this issue. Large power transformers used at power plants to step up voltage for transmission lines have also faced extended lead times, but the most significant stress has been in the distribution transformer market, where demand has surged and manufacturing capacity has struggled to keep up. This situation has made it extremely difficult for startups and other projects to plan and execute on shorter time scales.

    • Transformer lead times reached record highs due to housing market demandThe US transformer supply chain faced unprecedented lead times in 2020, with some customers waiting up to 2 years, due to housing market-driven demand outpacing manufacturing capacity.

      The distribution transformer supply chain in the United States experienced significantly longer lead times starting around 2020, with some customers facing wait times of up to 2 years. This was due to the rapid increase in demand for transformers, which outpaced the manufacturing base's ability to keep up. The situation was particularly severe for pad-mounted transformers, both single phase and three phase. The causes of this situation can be traced back to the housing market, with a strong correlation between housing starts and transformer demand. Historically, there have been periods of long lead times and transformer shortages, such as in 2000 and 2007 when housing starts approached 2 million a year. However, the current situation is unique due to the sustained demand and the lack of a corresponding increase in manufacturing capacity.

    • Factors driving transformer market demand surgeThe transformer market saw a surge in demand between 2020 and 2021 due to infrastructure upgrades, federal investments, and the electrification trend, but manufacturers' cautious approach and supply chain disruptions caused extended lead times.

      The transformer market experienced a significant demand surge between 2020 and 2021, which was driven by various factors including infrastructure upgrades, federal government investments, and the electrification trend, particularly in the automotive industry. However, the industry's response was not immediate due to the long lead times required to change manufacturing output. Previous experiences, such as the housing market crash in 2006-2007, may have also influenced manufacturers' cautious approach. The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting supply chain disruptions further complicated the situation, causing extended lead times that were not seen in other industries. Understanding these factors is crucial to grasping the transformer market's recent challenges and potential future developments.

    • Surge in Demand Overwhelms Transformer IndustryThe transformer industry was caught off guard by unexpected demand due to infrastructure spending, electrification, renewable energy sources, and severe storms, leading to a supply-demand gap.

      The transformer industry was caught off guard by the surge in demand following the false sense of complacency during the COVID-19 pandemic. The confluence of various factors, including infrastructure spending, electrification, renewable energy sources, and severe storms, overwhelmed the industry's capacity to meet the rising demand for distribution transformers. Despite the awareness of the sustained demand, expanding manufacturing capacity has proven to be a challenge for the industry, which was previously operating at full capacity. The saturation point made it difficult to produce the next incremental unit, leaving a gap between supply and demand.

    • Labor, investment, and steel supply challenges hinder US distribution transformer production expansionDespite labor shortages, high investment costs, long lead times, and limited domestic grain oriented steel supply, only one US manufacturer produces distribution transformers, making expansion difficult and costly

      Expanding the production of distribution transformers in the US is a complex and challenging process. Labor shortages, high investment costs, and long lead times for equipment are significant barriers. Additionally, the specialized steel required for transformer manufacturing, specifically grain oriented steel, is in high demand and limited in supply within the US. The only domestic manufacturer, Cleveland Cliffs, is operating at full capacity. Importing this steel from foreign sources comes with additional costs due to tariffs. Another alternative material, amorphous steel, also faces similar supply chain risks with only one US manufacturer. These factors make it difficult for distribution transformer suppliers to quickly and easily double their capacity.

    • DOE's proposed transformer efficiency standard causing uncertainty in industryThe proposed DOE standard could lead to industry-wide transition to amorphous steel, requiring significant investments, process changes, and workforce training, while current supply of amorphous steel is insufficient to meet demand.

      Regulation, specifically the proposed higher efficiency standard by the DOE, is causing uncertainty in the transformer manufacturing industry regarding the use of grain oriented steel versus amorphous steel. Amorphous steel, which has better energy efficiency, particularly during no load conditions, could significantly reduce the need for power generation. However, the transition to using amorphous steel would require significant investments, process changes, and workforce training. Additionally, the current supply of amorphous steel is not enough to meet the demand for transformers. The proposed standard, if enacted, could potentially worsen the existing supply chain challenges. The current situation is complex, but manufacturers are optimistic that the final decision will provide clarity and allow them to adapt accordingly.

    • Price increase of distribution transformersThe price of distribution transformers has risen significantly due to supply chain constraints and commodity costs, with projected stability in 2024. Utilities struggle to get rate increases approved, causing market anxiety. Manufacturers expand capacity to ease supply and demand gap, with major acquisitions and expansions underway.

      The price of distribution transformers has significantly increased due to supply chain constraints and rising commodity costs. The average price increase has been around 75 to 100% over the last couple of years, with some stability projected for 2024. Utilities, who ultimately bear the cost, are facing challenges in getting rate increases approved, leading to market angst. Manufacturers are passing through these costs and working to expand manufacturing capacity to alleviate the supply and demand gap. Major acquisitions and expansions are underway, and the industry is expected to see relief in the near term. However, the single phase pole problem may still be ongoing.

    • Challenges with transformer supply may last for 12-24 monthsDespite infrastructure demands and lack of planning, valuable lessons can be learned from current challenges. Long-term investment in advanced tech like power electronics and solid state transformers could lead to consistent voltage, improved efficiency, and better peak load management.

      The current challenges with single phase and three phase transformer supply, caused by unexpected infrastructure demands and lack of planning, may persist for the next 12 to 24 months. However, this experience may lead to valuable lessons, such as the importance of having US-based manufacturing and better coordination of activities. The technology side is also evolving, with promising advancements like power electronics and solid state transformers. These innovations could lead to more consistent voltage output, improved energy efficiency, and better management of peak load demand. While these technologies are currently more expensive, long-term investment could yield significant benefits.

    • Addressing the challenge of distribution transformer supplyCollaboration and innovation are crucial for addressing the challenge of distribution transformer supply in the energy sector, ensuring efficient and effective electricity delivery to consumers.

      Distribution transformers have been a major challenge for companies looking to expand their capacity in the energy sector. Tim Mills, the CEO of Ermco, acknowledged the efforts of his team and utility partners in trying to bridge the supply and demand gap in this area. Shell expressed support for Ermco's expansion plans. This issue is significant because the availability and reliability of distribution transformers are crucial for delivering electricity to consumers efficiently and effectively. The recognition of the hard work and dedication of the teams involved in addressing this challenge is important, as they have been instrumental in ensuring utilities receive the necessary equipment to meet their needs. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of collaboration and innovation in addressing critical challenges in the energy sector.

    Recent Episodes from Catalyst with Shayle Kann

    Under the hood of data center power demand

    Under the hood of data center power demand
    Driven by the AI boom, data centers’ energy demand could account for 9% of U.S. power generation by 2030, according to the Electric Power Research Institute. That's more than double current usage. So how do we meet that demand? And what impacts will it have on the grid and decarbonization? In this episode, Shayle talks to Brian Janous, former vice president of energy at Microsoft and current co-founder of Cloverleaf Infrastructure. Brian talks through the options for meeting data center demand, including shaping computational loads to avoid system peaks and deploying grid-enhancing technologies. He and Shayle also cover topics like: Why AI-driven demand will be big, even with “zombie requests” in the interconnection queue How hyperscalers are “coming to grips” with the reality that they may not hit decarbonization targets as quickly as planned Why Brian thinks efficiency improvement alone “isn’t going to save us” from rising load growth Why Brian argues that taking data centers off-grid is not a solution  Options for shaping data center load, such as load shifting, microgrids, and behind-the-meter generation How hyperscalers could speed up interconnection by shaping computational loads Recommended Resources: Electric Power Research Institute: Powering Intelligence: Analyzing Artificial Intelligence and Data Center Energy Consumption The Carbon Copy: New demand is straining the grid. Here’s how to tackle it. Federal Regulatory Energy Commission: Report | 2024 Summer Energy Market and Electric Reliability Assessment Make sure to listen to our new podcast, Political Climate – an insider’s view on the most pressing policy questions in energy and climate. Tune in every other Friday for the latest takes from hosts Julia Pyper, Emily Domenech, and Brandon Hurlbut. Available on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts. Be sure to also check out Living Planet, a weekly show from Deutsche Welle that brings you the stories, facts, and debates on the key environmental issues affecting our planet. Tune in to Living Planet every Friday on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

    Drew Baglino on Tesla’s Master Plan

    Drew Baglino on Tesla’s Master Plan
    Tesla’s Master Plan Part 3 lays out the company’s model for a decarbonized economy — and makes the case for why it's economically viable. It outlines a vision for extensive electrification and a reliance on wind and solar power.  In this episode, Shayle talks to one of the executives behind the plan, Drew Baglino, who was senior vice president for powertrain and energy at Tesla until April when he resigned. In his 18 years at Tesla he worked on batteries, cars, and even Tesla’s lithium refinery. Shayle and Drew cover topics like: Why Drew isn't sure that AI-driven load growth “is going to be as dramatic as people think” Drew’s optimism about the U.S.’ ability to build out enough transmission for decarbonization How to deal with the high rates of curtailment and what to do with that excess power Meeting the material requirements of decarbonization and Drew’s experience with permitting Tesla facilities  Recommended Resources: Tesla: Master Plan Part 3 CNBC: Tesla execs Drew Baglino and Rohan Patel depart as company announces steep layoffs The Carbon Copy: AI's main constraint: Energy, not chips Catalyst: Understanding the transmission bottleneck Utility rates could make or break the energy transition – so how do we do it right? On June 13, Latitude Media and GridX are hosting a Frontier Forum to examine the importance of good rate design and the consequences of getting it wrong. Register here. And make sure to listen to our new podcast, Political Climate – an insider’s view on the most pressing policy questions in energy and climate. Tune in every other Friday for the latest takes from hosts Julia Pyper, Emily Domenech, and Brandon Hurlbut. Available on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

    Heavy duty decarbonization

    Heavy duty decarbonization
    Batteries are making their way into more passenger cars and commercial vehicles than ever before, but the limits of electrification mean that we’ll likely need alternative fuels to decarbonize heavy transport like ships, planes, and trucks.  So what are those fuels and what modes of transport do they suit best? In this episode, Shayle talks to his colleague Andy Lubershane, partner and head of research at Energy Impact Partners. They talk through the limits of electrification and the alternatives for decarbonizing trucks, ships, and planes, drawing on Andy’s recent blog post, “How will we move the big, heavy things?”. They cover topics like: The main limitations of batteries: density and infrastructure Volumetric and gravimetric density, and why they matter for different types of vehicles How fossil fuels would beat out even a theoretical “uber-battery” multiple times denser than current batteries Why upgrading “always-on” grid infrastructure can be lengthy, expensive, and disruptive  The alternatives to electrification: biofuels, hydrogen, and e-fuels The advantages and limitations of each for different modes of transport Recommended Resources: Port of Long Beach: Our Zero Emissions Future Enterprise Mobility: Electrifying Airport Ecosystems by 2050 Could Require Nearly Five Times the Electric Power Currently Used Catalyst: Understanding SAF buyers Utility rates could make or break the energy transition – so how do we do it right? On June 13th, Latitude Media and GridX are hosting a Frontier Forum to examine the imperative of good rate design, and the consequences of getting it wrong. Register here. And make sure to listen to our new podcast, Political Climate – an insider’s view on the most pressing policy questions in energy and climate. Tune in every other Friday for the latest takes from hosts Julia Pyper, Emily Domenech, and Brandon Hurlbut. Available on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts.

    With Great Power: Why dynamic rates are gaining momentum

    With Great Power: Why dynamic rates are gaining momentum
    This week, we’re featuring a crossover episode of With Great Power, a show produced by Latitude Studios in partnership with GridX. Subscribe on Apple, Spotify, or wherever you get podcasts. Ahmad Faruqui has been researching electricity pricing since the mid 1970’s, when the cost of a kilowatt-hour was flat. But in the 80’s and 90’s, he started working on dynamic pricing – pioneering the concept of time-of-use rates. The big breakthrough for time-of-use rates came during the fallout from the California energy crisis. Later, thanks to the rollout of smart meters, more power providers started experimenting with dynamic rates. Now, new technology is making time-of-use rate design more transparent. This week, Ahmad talks with Brad about why dynamic pricing is gaining momentum among electric utilities – and what makes for good rate design.  On June 13th, Latitude Media and GridX will host a Frontier Forum to examine the imperative of good rate design – and the consequences of getting it wrong. Register at the link in the show notes, or go to latitudemdia.com/events. See you there!

    Could VPPs save rooftop solar?

    Could VPPs save rooftop solar?
    The U.S. rooftop solar market has tanked. Residential applications in California, the largest market in the country, plunged 82% from May through November 2023 compared to the same period in 2022. Contractors are going bankrupt. The big culprits are high interest rates and California’s subsidy cuts. But there are some bright spots. Battery attachment rates in California have surged. So what will it take to revive the U.S. rooftop solar market? In this episode, Shayle talks to Jigar Shah, director of the Loans Programs Office at the U.S. Department of Energy. Jigar argues that the rooftop solar industry should reinvent itself, relying on batteries and virtual power plants (VPPs). He also argues that regulations should focus on system-level dispatchability.  Shayle and Jigar cover topics like: The pros and cons of California’s latest regulations, new energy metering or NEM 3.0 Learning from the mistakes of California’s Self-Generation Incentive Program (S-GIP) The role of VPPs and rooftop solar in meeting accelerating load growth Incentivizing system-level dispatchability  How VPPs complicate the sales pitch for rooftop solar How VPPs could help utilities increase the utilization of infrastructure How to make VPPs more reliable Recommended Resources: U.S. Department of Energy: Virtual Power Plants Commercial Liftoff Latitude Media: Defining the rules of DER aggregation Latitude Media: Unpacking the software layer of VPP deployment CalMatters: What’s happened since California cut home solar payments? Demand has plunged 80%  The Wall Street Journal: The Home-Solar Boom Gets a ‘Gut Punch’ Catalyst is supported by Origami Solar. Join Latitude Media’s Stephen Lacey and Origami’s CEO Gregg Patterson for a live Frontier Forum on May 30th at 1 pm Eastern to discuss Origami’s new research on how recycled steel can help reinvigorate the U.S. solar industry. Register for free on Latitude’s events page.

    Understanding SAF buyers

    Understanding SAF buyers
    Airlines are lining up to buy as much sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) as they can, despite it costing two to three times more than conventional jet fuel, according to BloombergNEF. United Airlines has secured 2.9 billion gallons of SAF over, and others like Delta, Air France-KLM, and Southwest have secured around 1 billion gallons each. And yet to meaningfully decarbonize aviation, the SAF market needs to grow thousands of times larger than it is today. BloombergNEF estimates that global production capacity will grow 10-fold by 2030, but by then supply will still only meet 5% of jet fuel demand. So how are airlines thinking about scaling up their procurement of SAF? In this episode, Shayle talks to Amelia DeLuca, chief sustainability officer at Delta. They cover topics like: Who pays the green premium Infrastructure considerations, like SAF hubs and blending Technical pathways, like hydroprocessing, alcohol-to-jet, and power-to-liquids The role of incentives and regulation, like ReFuelEU Why airlines should procure SAF instead of buying carbon removal Recommended Resources: BloombergNEF: United Airlines Is Betting Big on a Pricey Green Aviation Fuel The Verge: Delta Air Lines lays out its plan to leave fossil fuels behind  Canary Media: Can corn ethanol really help decarbonize US air travel? Canary Media: How hydrogen ​‘e-fuels’ can power big ships and planes Catalyst: CO2 utilization Catalyst is supported by Origami Solar. Join Latitude Media’s Stephen Lacey and Origami’s CEO Gregg Patterson for a live Frontier Forum on May 30th at 1 pm Eastern to discuss Origami’s new research on how recycled steel can help reinvigorate the U.S. solar industry. Register for free on Latitude’s events page.

    The news quiz episode!

    The news quiz episode!
    This week, we have something a little different: a news quiz.  We recently took the stage with four investors at the Prelude Climate Summit — armed with a bell, a buzzer, and four different categories of questions. We tested two teams of venture investors on their knowledge of the most recent industry news. Shayle Kann and Cassie Bowe, partners at venture firm Energy Impact Partners, are team High Voltage.  Dr. Carley Anderson, principal at venture firm Prelude Ventures, and Matt Eggers, Prelude’s manager director, are team Shayle Gassed. (Prelude led fundraising for Latitude Media.) Stephen Lacey, executive editor of this show and host of The Carbon Copy, quizzes the teams on the latest in climate tech news. Which team will come out on top? Catalyst is supported by Origami Solar. Join Latitude Media’s Stephen Lacey and Origami’s CEO Gregg Patterson for a live Frontier Forum on May 30th at 1 pm Eastern to discuss Origami’s new research on how recycled steel can help reinvigorate the U.S. solar industry. Register for free on Latitude’s events page.

    CO2 utilization

    CO2 utilization
    The IPCC says that we likely need to capture hundreds of gigatons of CO2 if we want to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius. So what are we going to do with all that carbon? In this episode, Shayle talks to Julio Friedmann, chief scientist at Carbon Direct. Julio says we will store the vast majority of that CO2. But the markets for using CO2 in things like concrete, fizzy water, and chemicals will play an important role in developing the carbon management economy. Shayle and Julio cover topics like: The roughly 50 carbon capture facilities operating today and how much carbon they capture Why we should recycle carbon at all when we could just store it  Current uses for CO2, like fizzy water, enhanced oil recovery, and concrete Emerging chemical uses, like jet fuel, ethanol, urea, and methanol Substituting glass and metal with products that use recycled carbon, like polycarbonate and carbon fiber The “over the horizon” stuff, like making space elevators from graphene Solving the challenge of local opposition to carbon infrastructure Who will pay the green premium for products made with recycled carbon   Recommended Resources: Center on Global Energy Policy: Opportunities and Limits of CO2 Recycling in a Circular Carbon Economy: Techno-economics, Critical Infrastructure Needs, and Policy Priorities Canary Media: US Steel plant in Indiana to host a $150M carbon capture experiment NBC: Biden admin seeks to jumpstart carbon recycling with $100 million in grants Are growing concerns over AI’s power demand justified? Join us for our upcoming Transition-AI event featuring three experts with a range of views on how to address the energy needs of hyperscale computing, driven by artificial intelligence. Don’t miss this live, virtual event on May 8. Catalyst is supported by Origami Solar. Join Latitude Media’s Stephen Lacey and Origami’s CEO Gregg Patterson for a live Frontier Forum on May 30th at 1 pm Eastern to discuss Origami’s new research on how recycled steel can help reinvigorate the U.S. solar industry. Register for free on Latitude’s events page.

    Building a supply chain for rare earth elements

    Building a supply chain for rare earth elements
    Rare earth elements (REEs) are essential ingredients in electric vehicles, wind turbines, and many electronics. As with most critical minerals, China controls the vast majority of the REE supply chain. And so when it banned the export of REE processing technology last December, it raised concerns about supply. So what will it take to secure the supply of REEs?  In this episode, Shayle talks to Ahmad Ghahreman, CEO and cofounder of Cyclic Materials, a rare earth elements recycling company. (Energy Impact Partners, where Shayle is a partner, invests in Cyclic.) They cover topics like: The five high-value REEs used in the permanent magnets inside EVs, wind turbines, and other electronics The many steps in the supply chain, from extraction to end-of-life Building magnets without REEs Increasing production outside of China The role of recycling Why Ahmad is optimistic about developing a supply chain in North America Recommended Resources: MIT Technology Review: The race to produce rare earth elements IEEE Spectrum: Who Will Free EV Motors from the Rare Earth Monopoly? Are growing concerns over AI’s power demand justified? Join us for our upcoming Transition-AI event featuring three experts with a range of views on how to address the energy needs of hyperscale computing, driven by artificial intelligence. Don’t miss this live, virtual event on May 8.

    How an obscure, 100-year old law is disrupting U.S. energy

    How an obscure, 100-year old law is disrupting U.S. energy
    A little-known U.S. law called the Jones Act shapes climate tech in weird ways — like hindering offshore wind deployment and pushing up energy prices. The law, part of the Merchant Marine Act of 1920, requires all cargo shipped between U.S. ports to be carried by ships that meet strict standards. Those ships must be built in American shipyards, owned by an American company, registered in the U.S., and crewed by a majority American crew. As a result, building cargo ships in the U.S., and operating them between U.S. ports, is way more expensive than building and operating ships in other countries — and relatively few U.S. ships get built. So what are the impacts on climate tech? In this episode, Shayle talks to Colin Grabow, research fellow at the Cato Institute's Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies. They cover topics like: How the Jones Act increases the money and time required to deploy offshore wind turbines Why it costs less to ship U.S. oil and gas abroad than to domestic markets How it pushes domestic shipping to rely on trucks and trains instead of ships The history of the act and potential ways it could change Recommended Resources: WIRED: The US Has Big Plans for Wind Energy—but an Obscure 1920s Law Is Getting in the Way Cato Institute: Jones Act Leaves New England Vulnerable to Wintertime Calamity Cato Institute: Environmental Costs of the Jones Act Are growing concerns over AI’s power demand justified? Join us for our upcoming Transition-AI event featuring three experts with a range of views on how to address the energy needs of hyperscale computing, driven by artificial intelligence. Don’t miss this live, virtual event on May 8.

    Related Episodes

    GEEK+ [S1E01] - Des solutions flexibles, fiables et efficaces pour l'entrepôt

    GEEK+ [S1E01] - Des solutions flexibles, fiables et efficaces pour l'entrepôt

    Geek+, au service de la logistique intelligente d’aujourd’hui et de demain

    Un podcast de Geek+, par Émilien Villeroy.

     

    Spécialiste des robots mobiles autonomes, l'entreprise Geek+ dévoile ses ambitions et ses réalisations dans une série de trois podcasts. L'occasion de découvrir sa gamme de solutions pour une logistique intelligente.


    Du 5 au 8 avril, à l’occasion de l’édition 2022 de la SITL, Geek+ et ses équipes exposeront leur expertise, à Villepinte en région parisienne. L’occasion pour le spécialiste international de la logistique intelligente, déjà présent dans plus de 30 pays, de présenter son savoir-faire et sa stratégie au marché français, avec des solutions flexibles, résilientes et efficaces, s’appuyant sur la robotique et l’IA. Pour mieux comprendre comment ces innovations peuvent aider les acteurs logistiques et industriels, nous retrouvons pour ce premier épisode Jean-Daniel Cohen, directeur des ventes France de Geek +.



    Musique : Innovative Technologies, par Pavel Yudin

    IDEA [S2E01] - Un plan stratégique co-construit

    IDEA  [S2E01] - Un plan stratégique co-construit

    IDEA, prestataire indépendant de supply-chain industrielle, dévoile sa stratégie et ses ambitions pour 2025 dans cette deuxième saison de podcasts, donnant la parole à Nicolas DEROUAULT, directeur général délégué, Cédric VALMALLE, directeur du développement, et Lionel LEMARÉCHAL, directeur des ressources humaines.


    IDEA, une entreprise qui ose et s'engage


    Être un acteur logistique qui ose et s'engage, telle est l'ambition d'IDEA, prestataire indépendant de supply-chain industrielle, afin de développer des solutions responsables répondant aux défis d'aujourd'hui et de demain. Dans ce premier épisode, Nicolas Derouault, directeur général délégué d'IDEA, dévoile le nouvel plan stratégique du groupe, co-construit grâce à l'intelligence collective de toute une entreprise. Un plan ambitieux s'appuyant sur des solutions logistiques plus performantes et plus responsables.


    Crédits musique : Fredji - Happy Life

    https://soundcloud.com/fredjimusic

    https://www.facebook.com/fredjimusic/

    Episode 109: Adjusting Your Manufacturing Business to a Post COVID-19 World

    Episode 109: Adjusting Your Manufacturing Business to a Post COVID-19 World
    The COVID-19 pandemic has been a game changer for business. Last week on Make It Right Episode 108 supply chain expert Filippo Mauri discussed its impact on globalization, how it will affect supply chains, manufacturing businesses and company culture. This week Filippo shares his European perspective on how the shifting business landscape is impacting developing […]

    The Great Kettlebell Shortage

    The Great Kettlebell Shortage

    Host Sonari Glinton explores the great kettlebell shortage of 2020, as closed gyms led to unprecedented demand for home exercise equipment. We learn how manufacturing overseas made kettlebells difficult to get, and how bringing the manufacturing to the U.S. and supply chain diversification provided ways to meet the demand, but were far from simple solutions.

    In this episode we meet Jennifer Lau, co-owner of FitSquad who experienced the kettlebell demand firsthand. At the same time, Jay Perkins, the co-founder of Kettlebell Kings saw his supply of overseas manufactured kettlebells stall when demand was at its highest. We go to Viet Nam to meet Dinh Tien Vu, Director of Vietnam CastIron who was able to manufacture kettlebells in his foundry while Chinese factories were shut down. And we talk to Joe Franklin of USA-Iron, who was able to make kettlebells quickly by producing domestically in the USA.

    Disclaimers:

    The guest speakers are neither employees nor affiliated with Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. (“Morgan Stanley”). The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of Morgan Stanley. The information and data contained herein has been obtained from sources outside of Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley makes no representations or guarantees as to the accuracy or completeness of information or data from sources outside of Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley is not responsible for the information or data contained in this podcast.

    This podcast does not provide individually tailored investment advice and is not a solicitation of any offer to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument or to participate in any trading strategy. It has been prepared without regard to the individual financial circumstances and objectives of persons who receive it.

    © 2021 Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC. Members SIPC.