Logo
    Search

    Why medical error is not the third leading cause of death in the US

    enJune 08, 2024

    Podcast Summary

    • Medical errors and death statisticsThe claim that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the US is not accurate, as a 2016 study on which this claim is based used questionable methods and has been debunked by experts.

      The claim that medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US is not accurate. This misconception stems from a flawed 2016 study published in the BMJ, which was written by Professors Martin McCarry and Michael Daniel from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. The study used questionable methods and has since been debunked by experts in the field, such as Professor Mary Dixon-Woods from the Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute at Cambridge University. It's important to fact-check information before spreading it, especially when it comes to matters of life and death. Instead of focusing on medical errors as the third leading cause of death, we should continue to prioritize addressing the top causes, which are heart disease and cancer. Let's strive for accuracy and evidence-based information in our discussions and debates.

    • Medical errors impact on mortalityMedical errors, as the third leading cause of deaths in the US, contribute significantly to mortality through various preventable adverse events like allergic reactions, pressure ulcers, and healthcare-acquired infections. Improved data collection and care practices are essential to reduce their impact on patient health and mortality.

      Medical errors, which include preventable adverse events like allergic reactions, pressure ulcers, and healthcare-acquired infections, are a significant contributor to deaths in the US, estimated to be the third leading cause. These errors can range from severe allergic reactions to fatal ones, and can include failures to diagnose conditions like sepsis early enough. The article emphasizes the importance of better data collection to accurately measure the impact of medical errors on mortality. It's important to note that not all deaths directly caused by medical errors, but rather, they can contribute to or accelerate existing health conditions. For instance, pressure ulcers can cause significant suffering and even death, but it's more likely that patients died from their underlying health conditions rather than the pressure ulcers themselves. Medical errors are a complex issue, and determining the cause of death in these cases can be ambiguous. The article highlights the need for improved care practices to prevent these adverse events and reduce their impact on patient health and mortality.

    • Medical Errors StatisticsThe studies referenced did not definitively establish that medical errors cause 250,000 annual deaths in US hospitals as claimed, due to differences in methods, populations, and error types, and an overestimation of deaths caused by errors.

      The studies McCarry and Daniel referenced did not definitively establish that medical errors directly cause 250,000 deaths annually in the US hospitals, as they claimed. Instead, these studies mainly investigated the potential contribution of errors to deaths. The studies had significant differences in methods, populations, and error types. The authors combined these statistics without a rigorous methodology, and their extrapolation of the results to the entire US hospital population was not valid, as many admissions were for reasons other than errors, such as childbirth. This leads to an overestimation of the number of deaths caused by medical errors. It's essential to be cautious when interpreting these findings and to remember that most people die in hospitals due to their underlying health conditions.

    • Medical errors and fatalitiesMedical errors are likely responsible for around 3% of annual deaths in the US, or about 22,165 deaths per year, according to high-quality research.

      The common belief that medical errors are the third leading cause of death in the US, with an estimated 250,000 fatalities annually, is likely an overestimation. High-quality research, such as studies conducted by academics at Yale University, suggests that the preventable death rate in hospitals is closer to 3%, or approximately 22,165 deaths per year. These studies, which involve doctors reviewing medical records to determine if deaths were preventable, are imperfect but considered the best available data. The consistent findings across studies, despite being mostly from Europe and Canada, lead experts to believe this rate can be applied to the US. Medical errors remain a significant concern, but the misconception of the scale of preventable deaths in the US needs correction.

    • Patient safety reportingImproving patient safety reporting is crucial for accurate data on medical errors and addressing patient safety issues, while WISE offers a solution for global transactions with real-time exchange rates and no hidden fees.

      While patient safety is a significant issue, the exact number of deaths caused by medical errors may be subject to debate. The focus should be on improving reporting of medical errors to ensure accurate data. The BMJ has defended a controversial article on this topic, stating that it was a comment piece and did not contain factual errors. Meanwhile, WISE offers a solution for sending and receiving money worldwide at real-time exchange rates, with no hidden fees. The key takeaway from this discussion is the importance of addressing patient safety issues and improving reporting for more accurate data, while also utilizing financial tools like WISE for seamless transactions.

    Recent Episodes from More or Less: Behind the Stats

    Is increasing turbulence making flying more dangerous?

    Is increasing turbulence making flying more dangerous?

    Is climate change making turbulence more dangerous for people taking flights around the world?

    That’s what one listener asked, following a terrifying turbulence incident which left one person dead and more than 20 injured on a flight to Singapore.

    We speak to turbulence expert Paul Williams, Professor of Atmospheric Science at the University of Reading, to understand what is going on.

    Presenter: Kate Lamble Producer: Nathan Gower Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    Federer’s 54%: Tennis stats explained

    Federer’s 54%: Tennis stats explained

    How can tennis star Roger Federer have won only 54% of the points he played, but been the best player in the world? Jeff Sackmann, the tennis stats brain behind tennisabstract.com, explains to Tim Harford how probability works in the sport.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Sound Mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    The magic of trigonometry

    The magic of trigonometry

    You might have found it boring in school maths classes, but Matt Parker thinks we should all learn to love trigonometry.

    The ‘Love Triangle’ author talks to Tim Harford about the maths used in GPS, architecture and special effects.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Debbie Richford Series Producer: Tom Colls Production Co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Sound Mix: Nigel Appleton Editor: Richard Vadon

    Election endings, tennis and meeting men in finance

    Election endings, tennis and meeting men in finance

    Are Labour right about employment? Are the Conservatives right about cutting NHS managers? Are the Lib Dems right about share buyback? Are Reform UK right about their tax plans?

    How do they make the exit poll so accurate?

    What are the odds of meeting a very tall man in finance (with a trust fund)?

    What does it mean that Roger Federer only won 54% of the points he played?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead Latham and Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Rod Farquhar Editor: Richard Vadon

    How a tick box doubled the US maternal mortality rates.

    How a tick box doubled the US maternal mortality rates.

    he US has been portrayed as in the grip of a maternal mortality crisis. In contrast to most other developed nations, the rate of maternal deaths in the US has been going up since the early 2000s.

    But why? With the help of Saloni Dattani, a researcher at Our World in Data, Tim Harford explores how a gradual change in the way the data was gathered lies at the heart of the problem.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Producer: Debbie Richford Production Co-ordinator: Brenda Brown Series Producer: Tom Colls Sound Mix: Emma Harth Editor: Richard Vadon

    Election claims and erection claims

    Election claims and erection claims

    Are Labour right about the Liz Truss effect on mortgages? Are the Conservatives right about pensioners? Are Plaid Cymru right about spending? Are the Lib Dems right about care funding? Is Count Binface right about croissants?

    Why are MRP polls coming up with such different numbers?

    Do erections require a litre of blood?

    Tim Harford investigates the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Simon Tulett, Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead Latham and Debbie Richford Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Rod Farquhar Editor: Richard Vadon

    Do ‘pig butchering’ cyber scams make as much as half Cambodia’s GDP?

    Do ‘pig butchering’ cyber scams make as much as half Cambodia’s GDP?

    So-called “pig butchering” scams take billions of dollars from people around the globe. But do the cyber scams run from compounds in Cambodia really take an amount of money equivalent to half that country’s GDP? We investigate how the scale of these criminal operations has been calculated.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Andrew Garratt Editor: Richard Vadon

    Worse mortgages, better readers, and potholes on the moon

    Worse mortgages, better readers, and potholes on the moon

    Will Conservative policies raise mortgages by £4800, as Labour claim? Are primary school kids in England the best readers in the (western) world, as the Conservatives claim? Are there more potholes in the UK than craters on the moon?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Simon Tullet Beth Ashmead-Latham and Debbie Richford Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: James Beard Editor: Richard Vadon

    Shakespeare’s maths

    Shakespeare’s maths

    AWilliam Shakespeare might well rank as the most influential writer in the English language. But it seems he also had a knack for numbers.

    Rob Eastaway, author of Much Ado about Numbers, tells Tim Harford about the simple maths that brings Shakespeare’s work to life.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Readings: Stella Harford and Jordan Dunbar Producer: Beth Ashmead-Latham Series producer: Tom Colls Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: James Beard Editor: Richard Vadon

    Leaflets, taxes, oil workers and classrooms

    Leaflets, taxes, oil workers and classrooms

    What’s going on with the dodgy bar charts that political parties put on constituency campaign leaflets?

    What’s the truth about tax promises?

    Are 100,000 oil workers going to lose their jobs in Scotland?

    Will class sizes increase in state schools if private schools increase their fees?

    Tim Harford investigates some of the numbers in the news.

    Presenter: Tim Harford Reporter: Kate Lamble Producers: Nathan Gower, Beth Ashmead-Latham, Debbie Richford Production coordinator: Brenda Brown Sound mix: Neil Churchill Editor: Richard Vadon