Logo
    Search

    Has Rishi Sunak just destroyed his own campaign?

    enJune 07, 2024

    Podcast Summary

    • D-Day commemorations and electionsThe D-Day commemorations could potentially sway undecided voters or further sour opinions of Rishi Sunak, but the impact is uncertain due to low enthusiasm and viewing figures for the first debate, and the average British citizen spending only five minutes on politics weekly.

      The D-Day commemorations becoming an election issue, with Prime Minister Boris Johnson leaving early to return for a TV interview, could potentially sway undecided voters or further sour opinions of Rishi Sunak. However, with low enthusiasm and viewing figures for the first debate, and the average British citizen spending only five minutes on politics weekly, the impact remains uncertain. Ben Walker, our polling expert, emphasizes the significance of the D-Day commemorations and the potential for backlash, especially among those with negative views of Sunak. Finn McMredmond, junior commissioning editor and writer, adds that the general election apathy may limit the issue's reach.

    • Sunak's Funeral Reception AttendanceSunak's attendance at a party during the Queen's funeral reception sowed apathy among Tory voters, handed opponents easy attack lines, and reinforced perceptions of Tory apathy, potentially damaging Sunak's campaign.

      Rishi Sunak's decision to attend a party during Queen Elizabeth II's funeral reception has become a major political issue, sowing apathy among Tory voters and providing easy attack lines for opponents. This mistake, which goes against Sunak's messaging on national security and national service, has allowed Keir Starmer to be perceived as a serious statesman, while Sunak conducted an interview at ITV instead of standing beside Zelensky. Furthermore, Sunak's absence at the event handed Nigel Farage an opportunity to attack Sunak's patriotism, as Farage's party, Reform UK, presents itself as a political party despite being a private business. This incident may have long-lasting consequences for Sunak's campaign, as it reinforces the perception of Tory apathy and provides ammunition for opponents to criticize Sunak's judgment and leadership abilities.

    • Reform Party's unique structureThe Reform Party under Nigel Farage operates as both a political party and a private business, making it less democratic and leading to the unceremonious removal of Richard Tice. However, its surge in the polls is about mobilizing new voters, not stealing votes from other parties.

      While most political parties function as unincorporated associations with democratic structures, Reform Party under Nigel Farage operates as both a political party and a private business, which makes it less democratic. This was evident in the recent unceremonious removal of Richard Tice. The Reform Party's surge in the polls, following Nigel Farage's return, is not about stealing votes from other parties but rather about mobilizing new voters who were previously disengaged. The impact of tactical voting and the Reform Party on the election outcome remains to be seen.

    • British Election ShiftsThe current political climate in Britain could lead to significant shifts in parliamentary seats, with the Tory party potentially losing up to 30 seats, the Lib Dems gaining 10, and Labour 19. However, tactical voting could impact up to 4-6 dozen seats, with the Lib Dems potentially gaining even more.

      The current political landscape in Britain, as indicated by recent headline voting intentions, could lead to significant shifts in parliamentary seats if an election were held at that moment. The Tory party could lose up to 30 seats, with the Lib Dems gaining 10 and Labour 19. However, these numbers may not fully represent the situation due to the impact of tactical voting. In the 1997 election, around 2-3 dozen seats changed hands due to tactical voting. Given the current political climate and the scale of the Tory loss, this number could be closer to 4-6 dozen seats. The Lib Dems, who have stronger local support factored into the model, could potentially gain even more seats. It's important to remember that these numbers are based on current voting intentions and do not account for various factors that could change before an actual election takes place.

    • Local council elections insightsLocal council elections can reveal valuable insights into voting patterns of progressive voters between Labour and Lib Dems, potentially identifying seats where Lib Dems have a better chance.

      The outcome of local council elections, such as those in Aylesbury and Buckinghamshire, can provide valuable insights into the voting patterns of progressive voters between the Labour Party and the Liberal Democrats. These elections are more responsive to local trends and can identify seats where the Lib Dems have a better chance than even local organizers might realize. The current forecast suggests that the Lib Dems could gain between 50 to 70 seats due to reform advances and the drag on the Conservative Party. The upcoming seven-way debate, featuring representatives from various parties including Angela Rayner, Penny Mordaunt, and Nigel Farage, may not have a significant impact on the election outcome as TV debates generally have minimal cut-through compared to presidential-style debates in the US.

    • Debate impactDebates have less immediate impact and more about media framing of winners/losers, setting the tone for following days. Unpredictable outcome depends on various factors beyond content.

      The outcome of debates is less about immediate impact and more about how the media frames the winners and losers in the aftermath, setting the tone for the following days. For instance, the upcoming seven-way debate featuring Angela Rayner, Rishi Sunak, and others, is expected to be particularly dramatic, with Rayner potentially able to curb Nigel Farage's populist tendencies. However, debates can be chaotic, and it's essential to consider the context, such as the participants' backgrounds and their past stances on key issues. For example, Penny Mordaunt, who is being identified as a potential successor to Sunak, has a history with the armed forces and could present a formidable challenge. Overall, debates can be unpredictable, and the outcome often depends on various factors beyond the content of the debate itself.

    • Impact of debates on undecided votersDebates may not sway undecided voters, instead solidifying opinions of those already decided. Faraj Moussavian could potentially stand out, while Angela Rayner faces a challenge in changing perception. The debates may feel like an also-ran event, but could offer insight into candidates' abilities under pressure.

      The debates may not have a significant impact on undecided voters, as they typically pay little attention to politics and are more focused on their daily lives. Instead, the debates may serve to solidify the opinions of those who already have made up their minds. Among the participants, Faraj Moussavian could potentially stand out due to his professionalism and ability to respond effectively. However, Angela Rayner faces a challenge in changing public perception of her, which may limit her impact. The debate may feel like an also-ran event, with more charismatic figures like Stephen Flynn potentially stealing the spotlight. Ultimately, the debates may not be a game-changer in the election, but they could provide some insight into the candidates' abilities to perform under pressure.

    • Polling and voter intentionsAvoid sensationalizing poll numbers, consider multiple polls and averages, and examine historical context for a more accurate understanding of voter sentiment.

      Understanding polling and voter intentions requires a critical and nuanced perspective. During the current election campaign, various political leaders and commentators are closely analyzing polls and voter behavior. Keir Starmer, the Labor Party leader, frequently questions the Prime Minister through indirect means, while Daisy Cooper from the Lib Dems, Carla Denier from the Greens, and Rin Evans from Plaid Cymru are also making significant impacts. However, it's essential to remember that polling is not an exact science. Ben Walker, a political commentator, emphasizes that we should avoid sensationalizing poll numbers and instead recognize their error margins. He encourages us to look at multiple polls and consider an average to gain a more accurate understanding of voter sentiment. Additionally, it's crucial to examine historical context, such as the Scottish independence referendum and the EU referendum, to understand how polling data was presented and interpreted in the past. Overall, developing a deeper understanding of polling and voter intentions requires a thoughtful and informed approach.

    • Polling dataWhile polls can provide insights into public opinion, their error margins and the public's lack of political engagement make it crucial to interpret them with caution and consider aggregated data.

      While poll numbers and political events can be intriguing, it's essential to remember that they don't always accurately reflect the public's voting intentions. The error margins in polls are significant, and relying on a single pollster's data can be misleading. Moreover, the average British citizen pays scant attention to politics, making it unlikely that a particular issue or event will significantly shift voting patterns. The cost of living has been the most critical issue for voters for over a year, and politicians' stances on this matter have had the most significant impact on polling numbers. It's crucial to remember that what concerns politicians and activists may not align with the public's priorities. Therefore, it's vital to pay attention to poll aggregators and consider the error margins when interpreting polling data.

    • Political campaignsUnderstanding the nuances of political campaigns involves recognizing the significance of messaging, organization, and fundraising. Stay informed and engaged in the democratic process.

      Learning from this week's episode of The New States on podcast is the importance of understanding the nuances of political campaigns. Ben Walker and Finn McRedmond provided insights into the strategies and tactics being used by various political candidates, highlighting the significance of messaging, organization, and fundraising. They also emphasized the importance of staying informed and engaged in the democratic process. The team discussed the ongoing election coverage and shared their perspectives on key issues and developments. They reminded listeners that politics is a complex and dynamic field, and encouraged everyone to stay informed and involved. This episode was produced by Chris Stone and edited by Rob Lamar. We'll be back on Monday for more election campaign coverage.

    Recent Episodes from The New Statesman Podcast

    Andrew Marr: Could Tory tax cuts hurt the poorest?

    Andrew Marr: Could Tory tax cuts hurt the poorest?

    It's Tory manifesto Tuesday and the party is leading with pledges to make homes more affordable for first time buyers as well as a fresh new batch of tax cuts. But where is the money coming from to afford this? When the Conservatives say "welfare reform", what exactly do they mean?

     

    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by political editor Andrew Marr. Together they also discuss the rise of the far right in Europe and what this might mean for a Labour-led Britain.

     

    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Does the Lib Dem manifesto add up?

    Does the Lib Dem manifesto add up?

    It's manifesto week! It's week three of the election campaign and parties are set to deliver their manifestos in the coming days. This was kicked off today with the launch of the Lib Dem manifesto. So what have they pledged? Do the numbers add up? And does it really matter if they don't?


    The team also discuss what's been happening politically over the weekend, including Friday's seven headed debate, the continuation of Sunak's D Day-gate, and Macron's decision to call a snap election.


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor; Chris Deerin, Scotland editor; and Will Dunn, business editor.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Has Rishi Sunak just destroyed his own campaign?

    Has Rishi Sunak just destroyed his own campaign?

    Freddie, Ben and podcast newcomer Finn McRedmond answer listener questions.


    By deserting the D-day commemorations, Rishi Sunak has dealt his own campaign a massive blow and handed Keir Starmer and Nigel Farage explosive attack lines.


    In this special election edition of You Ask Us, the team answer your questions about the threat to the Conservatives from Reform UK and the impact of TV debates. Also polling expert Ben Walker reveals the shocking impact tactical voting could have on the Liberal Democrats election hopes.


    See the latest polls on the New Statesman's State of the Nation: https://sotn.newstatesman.com/


    Read:

    Rishi Sunak's D-Day departure was far worse than a gaffe

    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/rishi-sunaks-d-day-departure-was-far-worse-than-a-gaffe


    The Conservative party may not survive this election

    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/2024/06/conservative-party-may-not-survive-election-nigel-farage



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Who really holds power on the left?

    Who really holds power on the left?

    The most powerful person on the left of British politics is not Keir Starmer. So who is it?


    This week the New Statesman published the 2024 Left Power List, which ranks the 50 most influential people in British politics. George Eaton edited the list and joins Hannah Barnes and Freddie Hayward on the New Statesman podcast to discuss who's up, who's down, and what their influence means for the general election.


    Hannah, Freddie and George also discuss the latest events from the general election campaigns including Vaughan Gethin's confidence vote, more questionable Tory donations and Ed Davey's moving campaign video.


    See the Left Power List in full here: https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2024/06/new-statesman-left-power-list-2024



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Who's going to win the "£2,000" debate?

    Who's going to win the "£2,000" debate?

    Starmer and Sunak went head to head for the first time last night in their TV debate. Did we learn anything new? Not particularly. But the story dominating the headlines today is Sunak's claim that people would pay around £2,000 more in tax if Labour wins the election. He said that figure had been calculated by "independent Treasury officials". Starmer called this "garbage".


    So who's telling the truth?


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by political correspondent Freddie Hayward, and senior data journalist Ben Walker, who also takes us on a deep dive of the polls.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Andrew Marr: “Reform means game over for the Conservatives”

    Andrew Marr: “Reform means game over for the Conservatives”

    Nigel Farage is back ... what does this mean for the Conservatives and the future of the right in Britain?


    The team also discuss the Lib Dems pledge for social care, and why the main two parties refuse to talk about this issue which is affecting a high proportion of the electorate.


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, is joined by political editor Andrew Marr, and political correspondent Freddie Hayward.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Why Starmer needs to embrace nuclear weapons now

    Why Starmer needs to embrace nuclear weapons now

    Labour have launched their defence plans, leading with their 'triple lock' which focuses on nuclear submarines and a constant at sea deterrent for the UK. Does this departure from Labour's 2016 stance represent a change in the party or a change in the state of global affairs?


    Meanwhile, today the Conservatives have focused their energy on the Equality Act and its positioning on gender and biological sex.


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor at the New Statesman, is joined by Freddie Hayward, political correspondent.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Has Rishi Sunak made a big mistake?

    Has Rishi Sunak made a big mistake?

    Could the Conservatives become the third party? Is Ed Davey being too frivolous? Has Rishi Sunak made a huge mistake? And why do we still talk about older people like they're the Second World War generation?

     

    Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor, and Freddie Hayward, political correspondent, answer listener questions and give their campaign highlights thus far.

     

    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call

     

    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

    Is Labour purging the left of the party?

    Is Labour purging the left of the party?

    One week down, five to go.


    The Diane Abbott row continues to be a tricky thorn in Keir Starmer's side, and in the past 24 hours there have been more reports that candidates and MPs have been barred from standing. Is this a purge on the left of the party?


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor, and Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor, also discuss the launch of the Green Party's campaign, who are hoping to win four seats, and today's announcements on VAT and the economy.




    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Labour's grand mishandling of the Diane Abbott row

    Labour's grand mishandling of the Diane Abbott row

    Today Labour announced some bold plans for the NHS, stating that they would clear the Tory backlog in their first time. However this has been completely overshadowed by the mishandling of Diane Abbott's position in the party.


    This morning, Abbott, who has served as Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington since being elected in 1987, has announced that she has been barred by the party from standing in the next general election. By lunchtime Starmer was saying that no decision had been taken to block her from standing for Labour. So what's going on and will this botched stage handling backfire for Labour?


    Hannah Barnes, associate editor at the New Statesman, is joined by Freddie Hayward, political correspondent, and Rachel Cunliffe, associate political editor.


    Sign up to the New Statesman's daily politics newsletter: Morning Call


    Submit a question for a future episode: You Ask Us







    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.