Logo

    Podcast Summary

    • Overcoming Adherence Issues with Cochlear ImplantsCochlear implants offer a remarkable solution to hearing loss, but adherence issues, such as forgetfulness or perceived side effects, can prevent individuals from experiencing the full benefits. Addressing these issues remains a challenge for researchers and individuals.

      Cochlear implants bypass defective hair cells in the cochlea and transform sound into electrical energy to stimulate nerves, allowing severe to completely deaf individuals to have normal levels of hearing. While the technology is remarkable, it highlights the issue of failing to take advantage of advances in medicine and other fields. Prescription adherence is a widespread problem due to forgetfulness or perceived side effects, with potential public health ramifications. Even something with an obvious upside like the cochlear implant can face adherence issues, with only half of participants wearing their external device full-time. Randomized control trials have shown the real impact of these advances, but addressing adherence issues remains a challenge for researchers and individuals alike.

    • Bridging the Gap Between Research and Policy ImplementationTo translate research findings into effective policies, field experiments should be conducted, and policymakers and the public should be involved to bridge the gap between academic research and practical policy implementation. Evaluating policy effects is crucial to ensure intended goals are achieved.

      Evidence-based policies are failing to scale up due to the mismatch between perfect lab conditions and realistic, messy implementation in the real world. Academics are struggling to translate their research findings into effective policies because policymakers often prioritize practicality and cost-effectiveness over theoretical efficacy. John List's solution is to conduct field experiments to generate new data while working closely with policymakers and the public to bridge the gap between academic research and policy implementation. It is crucial to evaluate the effects of public policy to ensure that they achieve their intended goals. This way, evidence-based policies can achieve their full potential and benefit society as intended.

    • Understanding the Science of Scaling Interventions for Effective Results.Integrate scientific rigor with practical solutions to ensure effective scaling of interventions. Understanding barriers to uptake and engaging all stakeholders is vital. Early education programs like the Parent Academy show promise in this regard.

      The problem of scaling interventions is a crisis, and policies that do not account for it may be undermined in the public eye. Even programs with good intentions and proven results can fail if they do not receive the right amount of uptake. To address this, researchers like John List and Dana Suskind are working to understand the science of using science and finding scalable solutions. Their focus is on early education, where interventions like the Parent Academy have shown promise. However, achieving scalability requires understanding the barriers to uptake and finding ways to engage all stakeholders. Overall, integrating scientific rigor with practical solutions is key to scaling interventions effectively.

    • The Importance of Early Language Development for Children from Low-Income HomesChildren from low-income homes hear less words than their affluent peers, affecting their brain development. Parental interaction and talk in early years are crucial for foundational development. T.M.W. Center emphasizes this approach for optimizing early childhood development.

      The language children hear in the first three years of life is crucial for their brain development. This is especially important for children from low-income homes who hear millions fewer words than their affluent peers. Research shows that parent talk and interaction in the early years are the catalyst for optimizing early foundational brain development. Surgeon Dana Suskind started the Thirty Million Words Initiative which later became the T.M.W. Center, focusing on a population-level approach to improve early childhood development. The center's work isn't just about words, it's about the interaction between parents and children. This research shows that addressing socioeconomic disparities requires more than just medical interventions.

    • The Benefits and Process of Scaling Early Childhood Language ProgramsExposure to language in early childhood aids brain development. To make an impact, scalable programs targeting places parents visit are recommended. Scaling involves stages and learning from failures. Treatment Foster Care Oregon has seen success in improving outcomes for children.

      The research indicates that heavy language exposure in the early years is beneficial to brain development. To achieve population-level impact, programs should be developed with scalability in mind, targeting areas parents go regularly. The process of scaling involves stages, with randomized controlled trials best situated in real-world settings. One program that saw success is Treatment Foster Care Oregon, which places a child singly in a family that uses evidence-based parenting skills and offers therapy and support at school, resulting in fewer arrests, less institutionalization, and lower drug use. It also costs less than group homes. Scaling is not an end but rather a continuation, with success achieved through learning from failures.

    • Overcoming Complications in Scaling Up Successful Research FindingsImplementation science studies how to effectively and efficiently implement programs, which is especially important for evidence-based policy and programs that aim to improve children's lives. Understanding the complexities of implementation can bring innovative research to a wider audience.

      Scaling up successful research findings to multiple sites requires more than data and outcomes. Systemic complications, such as conflicting policies and procedures, can impede implementation. Implementation science is a relatively new field that focuses on how to effectively and efficiently implement programs into practice. It studies the quality of implementation and its impact on program efficacy. This type of science is especially important for evidence-based policy and programs that aim to improve the lives of children. By understanding the complexities of implementation and the infrastructure-delivery mechanism, scientific entrepreneurs and institutions can work together to bring innovative research to a wider audience.

    • The Importance of Scaling Science in Effective InterventionResearchers need to understand scaling science to avoid failures when scaling up successful interventions. Lack of replicable evidence can lead to ineffective programs, so it's important to have a strong research foundation before scaling up.

      Scaling up interventions that work in research settings is a complicated process that has potential to help millions, but often fails due to lack of evidence, cost overruns or unintended consequences. Scaling science, or understanding how an intervention will work in different contexts and populations, is necessary to make sure that it continues to be effective. However, many programs lack strong research evidence to justify scaling. This false positive occurs when small-scale research findings are not replicable on a larger scale and can lead to ineffective interventions. Understanding how scaling science works can help researchers to identify and avoid scaling failures, and ultimately help more people benefit from successful interventions.

    • Considerations for Scaling Up ProgramsScaling up programs requires careful consideration and adaptation to ensure effectiveness in larger populations. Prioritizing certain populations and settings may not accurately reflect reality, and aspects of the situation may change.

      Scaling up programs requires careful consideration to ensure the right people are studied, the right situation is used, and the program is given at the right dosage. Scaling up to a general population can lead to the disappearance of effects seen in smaller studies due to the wrong people being studied. Researchers may prioritize populations or settings that best suit their program, but this may not accurately reflect the reality of implementation. Additionally, aspects of the situation change when scaled up, leading to a voltage drop in results. To maximize the success of programs, careful consideration and adaptation is necessary to ensure they are effective in the larger population.

    • Challenges and Solutions for Scaling Successful InterventionsTo ensure sustainable impact when scaling interventions, confirm effectiveness through research and replications, balance tradeoffs, and meet diverse stakeholder needs while choosing between speed and quality.

      Scaling successful interventions in education and medicine poses significant challenges. One major issue is maintaining the quality of tutors or technical support as programs expand, leading to higher costs or reduced impact. Additionally, the original designer may not be able to stay involved as the program scales, risking loss of efficacy. A possible solution proposed by experts is to only scale programs after the original research and three or four independent replications confirm its effectiveness. This level of certainty is rarely achieved in the real world, however. Scaling successfully also requires balancing tradeoffs, meeting the needs of diverse stakeholders, and choosing between speed and quality. Understanding these failure buckets is crucial to avoiding scaling traps and creating sustainable impact.

    • Prioritizing Replication and Robustness to Rebuild Trust in Scientific ResearchFunding agencies should prioritize replication studies to slow down premature decisions based on unverified findings, while scholars need to be rewarded for producing independently replicable research. The emphasis on scalability and fidelity during implementation will help ensure that policies are based on credible evidence.

      The credibility crisis in science can be addressed by prioritizing replication and ensuring the robustness of original research. Policymakers and funding agencies should fund replication studies to slow down premature decisions based on unverified findings. Scholars should be rewarded for attempting to replicate and producing independently replicable research. Additionally, original researchers must address the scalability of their findings and ensure that they are robust enough to be implemented on a larger scale. This requires understanding the key components that produce the intended outcomes and measuring fidelity during implementation. By prioritizing replication and robustness, we can rebuild trust in scientific research and ensure that policies are based on credible evidence.

    • Scaling Up Treatment Foster Care Oregon Through Humility and Remote MonitoringTreatment Foster Care Oregon's success in scaling up was due to the development of fidelity standards, a willingness to adjust, and a holistic approach that included a skills coach. Building evidence is important, but balance is essential.

      Treatment Foster Care Oregon, a successful program designed by clinical psychologist Dr. Patricia Chamberlain for young people in foster care, was able to scale up and spread to over 100 sites worldwide due to the development of fidelity standards that allowed for remote monitoring and adjustments. One key to the program's success was being able to step back incrementally and avoid becoming a bottleneck in the scaling process. Humility and the willingness to make adjustments were also important in the implementation of the program. Realizing that the children needed more than therapy, they introduced a skills coach. In scaling up such programs, it is essential to balance the need for information with the need to build evidence.

    • The Role of Science in Evidence-Based Policymaking: Overcoming Barriers to ScaleTo achieve optimal solutions, it's important to consider both sides of the market and use science in policymaking. Taking small steps in the right direction can lead to increasing returns to scale and redirect literature towards the right direction faster.

      To achieve optimal solutions, it is necessary to consider both sides of the market even though people are the chief barrier to scaling up programs to help them. Although majorly caused by people, it is not a fatal flaw that renders science useless in evidence-based policymaking; rather, with science, the opportunity cost of time can be reduced while the per-unit cost for scaling reduces as things get bigger, leading to increasing returns to scale. Scaling in evidence-based policymaking is a vexing problem, but taking small steps in the right direction theoretically and empirically can redirect literature towards the right direction faster. Using science in policymaking can perfect an imperfect world.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    589. Why Has the Opioid Crisis Lasted So Long?

    Most epidemics flare up, do their damage, and fade away. This one has been raging for almost 30 years. To find out why, it’s time to ask some uncomfortable questions. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • David Cutler, professor of economics at Harvard University.
      • Travis Donahoe, professor of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 23, 2024

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Extra: Car Colors & Storage Units

    Presenting two stories from The Economics of Everyday Things: Why does it seem like every car is black, white, or gray these days? And: How self-storage took over America.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Tom Crockett, classic car enthusiast.
      • Zachary Dickens, executive vice president and chief investment officer of Extra Space Storage.
      • Mark Gutjahr, global head of design at BASF.
      • Kara Kolodziej, self-storage unit tenant.
      • Anne Mari DeCoster, self-storage consultant.
      • Nikkie Riedel, carline planning manager at Subaru of America.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 20, 2024

    588. Confessions of a Black Conservative

    588. Confessions of a Black Conservative

    The economist and social critic Glenn Loury has led a remarkably turbulent life, both professionally and personally. In a new memoir, he has chosen to reveal just about everything. Why?

     

    • SOURCE:
      • Glenn Loury, professor of economics at Brown University and host of The Glenn Show.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usMay 16, 2024

    587. Should Companies Be Owned by Their Workers?

    587. Should Companies Be Owned by Their Workers?

    The employee ownership movement is growing, and one of its biggest champions is also a private equity heavyweight. Is this meaningful change, or just window dressing?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Marjorie Kelly, distinguished senior fellow at The Democracy Collaborative.
      • Corey Rosen, founder and senior staff member of the National Center for Employee Ownership.
      • Pete Stavros, co-head of Global Private Equity at KKR.

     

     

    586. How Does the Lost World of Vienna Still Shape Our Lives?

    586. How Does the Lost World of Vienna Still Shape Our Lives?

    From politics and economics to psychology and the arts, many of the modern ideas we take for granted emerged a century ago from a single European capital. In this episode of the Freakonomics Radio Book Club, the historian Richard Cockett explores all those ideas — and how the arrival of fascism can ruin in a few years what took generations to build.

     

     

     

    Extra: Why Is 23andMe Going Under? (Update)

    Extra: Why Is 23andMe Going Under? (Update)

    Five years ago, we published an episode about the boom in home DNA testing kits, focusing on the high-flying firm 23andMe and its C.E.O. Anne Wojcicki. Their flight has been extremely bumpy since then. This update includes an additional interview with the Wall Street Journal reporter who has been investigating the firm’s collapse.

     

     

     

    585. A Social Activist in Prime Minister’s Clothing

    585. A Social Activist in Prime Minister’s Clothing

    Justin Trudeau, facing record-low approval numbers, is doubling down on his progressive agenda. But he is so upbeat (and Canada-polite) that it’s easy to miss just how radical his vision is. Can he make it work?

     

     

     

    584. How to Pave the Road to Hell

    584. How to Pave the Road to Hell

    So you want to help people? That’s great — but beware the law of unintended consequences. Three stories from the modern workplace. 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Joshua Angrist, professor of economics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
      • Zoe Cullen, professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
      • Marina Gertsberg, senior lecturer in finance at the University of Melbourne.

     

    Extra: The Men Who Started a Thinking Revolution (Update)

    Extra: The Men Who Started a Thinking Revolution (Update)

    The psychologist Daniel Kahneman — a Nobel laureate and the author of Thinking, Fast and Slow — recently died at age 90. Along with his collaborator Amos Tversky, he changed how we all think about decision-making. The journalist Michael Lewis told the Kahneman-Tversky story in a 2016 book called The Undoing Project. In this episode, Lewis explains why they had such a profound influence.

     

     

     

    Why Are There So Many Bad Bosses? (Update)

    Why Are There So Many Bad Bosses? (Update)

    People who are good at their jobs routinely get promoted into bigger jobs they’re bad at. We explain why firms keep producing incompetent managers — and why that’s unlikely to change.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Nick Bloom, professor of economics at Stanford University.
      • Katie Johnson, freelance data and analytics coach.
      • Kelly Shue, professor of finance at the Yale University School of Management.
      • Steve Tadelis, professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley Haas School of Business.