Wokeness Decline: Carmen Curoga's cafe name sparked backlash over the term 'woke,' which is politically charged. Research indicates that wokeness peaked around 2021-22 but is now declining, reflected in shifting public opinions and media coverage, shaping future political discussions in America.
Carmen Curoga opened a breakfast cafe in Coventry, Connecticut, named 'Woke Breakfast and Coffee' without realizing the political implications of the term 'woke.' Despite backlash from conservatives, she received local support. Research from The Economist shows that public opinion around wokeness peaked around 2021-22 and has declined since, with conservatives highlighting this ongoing issue in politics. Various surveys indicated a rise in concerns about racial injustices and equality before peaking. Key terms associated with wokeness also saw increased media usage over time, demonstrating a shift in public attitudes. As America moves past peak wokeness, understanding these changes could impact upcoming elections and political discourse.
Decline of Wokeness: Wokeness has decreased significantly since its peak around 2021, with younger people moderating their views, and white Democrats often showing more concern about racial issues than Black individuals.
In recent years, the term 'wokeness' and related concepts have seen a significant decline in their usage across various platforms, including media, academia, and corporate settings. Initially gaining traction following critical events like George Floyd's death, awareness and discussions about racial inequality peaked around 2021 but have since decreased. Interestingly, surveys reveal that while younger generations were perceived as the most 'woke', they have shown the steepest decline in these beliefs, moderating their views. Moreover, white Democrats were found to be more concerned about these issues than Black individuals, which was surprising. Overall, this decline suggests a shift in public discourse, with a recognition of systemic issues still present but perhaps presented in a less fervent way than before.
Racial Dynamics: Awareness of racial issues increased among white liberals after events like George Floyd's death, despite studies showing a decline in racism metrics, leading to a complex interaction between activism, backlash, and institutional beliefs.
Recent events like the deaths of Mike Brown and George Floyd sparked significant discussions around racism in America. Many white liberals began to understand racism as a pressing issue, especially with the rise of movements like Black Lives Matter. However, studies suggest that while awareness grew, actual racism declined in measurable ways. There was a notable disconnect between perceived racism and reality, leading to some backlash against ideas like defunding the police. Despite this, certain ideological beliefs have become institutionalized in universities, raising concerns about their long-term impact. Overall, the dynamics surrounding race and equity are complex, with fluctuations in awareness and activism reflecting deeper patterns in American history.
Great Awokenings: Society undergoes awakenings, or 'great awokenings,' during economic hardship, especially among educated elites expecting more from life. These movements reflect frustrations with social inequities and often dissipate as conditions improve.
Musa Al-Gabi explores three significant periods of societal awakening, termed 'great awokenings.' He argues that these awakenings often happen when there are too many educated individuals expecting better lives but facing economic hardships. The 1920s, 1960s, and late 80s to early 90s saw protests as marginalized groups sought recognition, equality, and justice in response to social and economic inequalities. Al-Gabi posits that these movements were often sparked by frustrations within knowledge industries, where people felt let down by the system. As the economy improved, the urgency for these movements diminished. This pattern highlights how social disparities can ignite demands for social change, illustrating that awareness often emerges from the tension between expectations and reality in society.
Wokeness Dynamics: Wokeness prompts polarized political actions, with the right responding through restrictive measures, while the left struggles for effective reform. This reflects a historical pattern of suppressing dissent rather than encouraging dialogue, highlighting the need for open engagement across differing opinions.
The conversation highlights how both sides of the political spectrum have employed the concept of 'wokeness' to promote their agendas. Right-wing responses to perceived wokeness have led to a series of actions that influence education and public discourse. Meanwhile, the left has struggled to achieve meaningful policy change, leading to backlashes that result in restrictive laws. This dynamic reflects a historical tendency for groups to suppress dissent while promoting their beliefs. The issue is not just about opposing ideologies, but also about the lack of productive dialogue and real solutions. Data on public sentiment regarding wokeness reveals its complex nature, suggesting that while extreme cases receive attention, they may not fully represent the overall understanding or reach of the movement. Ultimately, the challenge lies in fostering open discussion and thoughtful engagement across ideological lines.
Wokeness Balance: Wokeness has increased awareness of social injustices, influencing workplaces positively, but has also created divisions and fear of expression. Future shifts in attitudes will depend on political outcomes and how younger generations navigate these issues, aiming for dialogue rather than conflict.
The recent era of heightened awareness of social injustices, often referred to as 'wokeness', has led to positive changes, such as increased recognition of biases and a more civil workplace. However, it has also created divisions between groups and fear in expressing differing opinions. Future developments may depend on political shifts and how younger generations adapt their views as they take on leadership roles. While awareness of issues like racism has grown, the backlash and performance of identifying as 'woke' can alienate people, complicating unity. Lessons learned from examining inequalities should focus on removing barriers rather than enforcing quotas. The next phase might see a balance between awareness and dialogue, fostering common ground while remaining sensitive to the past and future.
Shifting Rhetoric: Democrats are shifting from extreme progressive rhetoric to broader policies that aim to help all Americans, rather than just specific groups. This change reflects lessons learned from past electoral challenges and the need to address widespread feelings of victimhood across political lines.
There's been a noticeable shift within the Democratic Party from more extreme progressive ideas back to traditional values. This change is partly due to past failures of certain policies like calls for defunding policing, which many see as harmful. Leaders are now focusing on broader solutions that assist all Americans instead of catering to specific groups. This switch is essential as many citizens feel victimized regardless of their political affiliation. The conversation must be about inclusive policies, such as poverty aids, rather than divisive rhetoric regarding systemic racism. In this landscape, if Donald Trump were to be re-elected, it could ironically revive attention on these issues, highlighting the need for cohesive and supportive political dialogue.
Understanding Woke: 'Woke' now refers to awareness of social justice issues. Florida's Stop Wrong to Our Kids and Employees Act and Marks & Spencer’s LGBT+ sandwich illustrate how companies and legislation engage with this term, often facing criticism for being tokenistic rather than truly supportive.
In recent years, the word 'woke' has evolved to mean being aware of social justice issues, especially those related to race. Florida's Stop Wrong to Our Kids and Employees Act is one example of how 'woke' is used in political contexts. Companies too have jumped on the 'woke' bandwagon, often creating marketing campaigns to show support for various causes. A notable example is Marks & Spencer’s LGBT+ sandwich, created during Pride Month to raise money for related charities. While it had good intentions, some criticized it as tokenism, highlighting a growing concern that companies may exploit social justice movements for profit. This behavior sheds light on the fine line between genuine support and mere commercialization of social issues.
Woke croaks: “peak woke” has passed
Recent Episodes from Economist Podcasts
Ground assault: Israeli forces invade Lebanon
As Israeli troops move into Lebanon and missiles strike Damascus in Syria, can Israel’s next offensive really stay “limited, localised and targeted”? Japan’s new prime minister loves planes, trains and ramen, but with few allies within his own party, his premiership may attract less devotion (8:57). And the worst invention in modern office life: “the sandwich lunch” (15:24).
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Beirut force: Israel kills Hizbullah leader
Israel’s attacks on Lebanon and Yemen this weekend will have implications far beyond the militant groups that were the apparent targets. Our correspondents analyse what may happen next. Our correspondent reports from a conference for journalists exiled from Belarus—home to “Europe’s last dictator”—to find out how they get news in (11:30). And a new card game is shaking Communist Party offices in China (19:21).
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
The Weekend Intelligence: Crunch time for Ukraine
Ukraine’s President has been in New York this week. With a victory plan in his pocket, he’s been shoring up support at the UN and among America’s presidential contenders.
On the world stage Mr Zelensky presents a united front but back home things are a little more patchy. It's crunch time for Ukraine. Winter is coming, some Western partners are tiring, Ukrainians are tiring too. In this special episode of The Weekend Intelligence our Editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes travels to Ukraine to speak to generals, soldiers and civilians to find out what lies ahead.
To listen every week and enjoy all our podcasts you'll need a subscription to Economist Podcasts Plus. Follow the link in the show notes for a free trial
To hear more about Ukraine, join our live event on October 25th. Our editors will discuss the situation on the battlefield, the impact of the American election and the diplomacy in the background. To sign up, go to: economist.com/registertoday
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Woke croaks: “peak woke” has passed
Over the past decade a form of wokeness arose on the illiberal left, characterised by extreme pessimism about America and its capacity to make progress. Analysis by The Economist of how influential these ideas are today finds that wokeness peaked in 2021-22 and has since receded. Why is America becoming less “woke”?
John Prideaux hosts with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon. They’re joined by The Economist’s Ainslie Johnstone and Sacha Nauta, and Professor Musa al-Gharbi of Stony Brook University.
Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Missile-stop tour: Zelensky in America
Ukraine’s president is again on American shores, trying to secure support of all kinds. He needs it—diplomatically, militarily and politically. America’s tendencies toward “woke” discourse and policies have permeated its politics, but our analysis finds that “peak woke” is already in the past (8:57). And the latest instalment of the wildly popular football video-game formerly known as simply “FIFA” (17:13).
Get a world of insights by subscribing to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
War or less? Lebanon on the brink
For now, Israel’s moves seem to be posturing, a means to intimidate Hizbullah into backing down. But there remains a prospect of a ground invasion—and another pointless war. Our swing-state series starts with a state that only recently became swing-y: North Carolina (10:08). And a look back at a year’s worth of Economist Podcasts+ audio journalism (19:15).
Get a world of insights by subscribing to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
No right left: Afghanistan’s oppressed women
Even before last month’s revised religious rules, Afghanistan’s women were being crushed under the Taliban’s thumb. Now they cannot even so much as raise their voices. While other countries try to crimp the flow of cheap Chinese electric cars, Britain is welcoming them—for now (9:55). And why the French have at last come to appreciate “Emily in Paris” (16:12).
Get a world of insights by subscribing to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Shun while it lasted: never-Trumpers’ fading sway
A handful of Republican leaders have been denouncing Donald Trump since his first presidential campaign. Will the voices of those who remain be heeded this time around? China’s attempt to fix its pensions by raising the retirement age will create a different problem with childcare (7:40). And the seemingly bottomless market for pet-pampering (14:21).
Get a world of insights by subscribing to Economist Podcasts+. For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Bulls’ AI: funding artificial intelligence
Artificial Intelligence has gained ground so fast that OpenAI, the firm powering ChatGPT, is changing Silicon Valley’s investment model and how it innovates. Why the global nuclear order may be in peril (10:24). And an alternative type of electoral forecasting is gaining ground: political astrology (19:02).
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—Subscribe to Economist Podcasts+
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Election rejection: fears of a contested result
Republicans are already preparing to contest the result if Kamala Harris wins the presidency. American elections demand patience and trust, but with Donald Trump on the ballot those are in short supply. How ugly could this election get? And what will happen if the result is contested?
John Prideaux hosts with Charlotte Howard and Idrees Kahloon. They’re joined by former Georgia lieutenant governor Geoff Duncan and Congressman Jamie Raskin.
This episode uses audio from The Laska Archive titled “Kentucky representative Thurston Ballard Morton on investigation election fraud 08 0011”.
Runtime: 48 min
Transcripts of our podcasts are available via economist.com/podcasts
Listen to what matters most, from global politics and business to science and technology—subscribe to Economist Podcasts+.
For more information about how to access Economist Podcasts+, please visit our FAQs page or watch our video explaining how to link your account.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.