Tucker Carlson on Trump, Putin, Churchill & More
en
January 29, 2025
TLDR: Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan discuss topics including Donald Trump's second term, attempts on his life, Biden Administration, wokeism, western civilization, World War 2, and freedom of speech in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

In a riveting podcast episode, Tucker Carlson reflects on his career's ups and downs while engaging in a deep conversation with Piers Morgan. Set against the backdrop of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, the two tackle various pressing topics, including politics, history, and cultural issues.
Key Themes and Insights
The Political Landscape
- Trump’s Presidency: Carlson shares insights on the impact of former President Donald Trump, touching on his policies and the political climate surrounding his administration.
- Biden Administration's Critique: He expresses skepticism about the effectiveness and motives behind current administration policies, alluding to perceived attacks on Trump.
- Wokeism: The discussion highlights the rise of woke culture, with Carlson and Morgan asserting its adverse effects on society and common sense.
Historical Context and Comparisons
- Winston Churchill: Carlson critiques Churchill's legacy, questioning how a victor in World War II could lead to the current state of Britain. He argues that despite the defeat of the Nazis, Churchill's alliances and the decisions post-war have led to England's decline.
- World War II Analysis: The conversation explores the complexities of wartime alliances, particularly with Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, raising ethical questions about preserving national interests over moral authority.
The Contemporary Global Environment
- Visit to Saudi Arabia: The backdrop of Saudi Arabia serves as a platform for discussing preconceived notions about the Middle East, emphasizing the country's modernization and shifting cultural landscape.
- Freedom of Speech: The duo discusses the fundamental ideals of freedom of speech, suggesting that recent political and cultural developments threaten this essential tenet in Western society.
Key Takeaways
- Truth and Accountability: Carlson emphasizes the importance of holding leaders accountable, both historically and in contemporary politics. He argues that the truth must prevail, even if it challenges established narratives.
- Cultural Self-Respect: A recurring theme is the necessity for countries to maintain their unique identities and cultures. Both Carlson and Morgan stress the need to defend national pride amidst globalization and cultural erosion.
- Political Engagement: Carlson encourages open discourse and understanding, advocating for the need to engage even with those one may disagree with, in a bid to foster a healthier political landscape.
Conclusion
The podcast captures a moment of candid exchange between Tucker Carlson and Piers Morgan, traversing complicated social, historical, and political terrains. Their discourse is not just an analysis of current events but also a deeper reflection on the importance of preserving freedom of thought and national self-identity in an increasingly polarized world.
Was this summary helpful?
The first week is being extruded. I'm never sitting like it. It's shocking to me. So you don't have to obey anymore. And all the liberal weight ladies are like, whoa, yes you do. The menopausal angry liberal chick was just too much. The bishop lecturing Trump. My bishop. This is not a Christian organization at all. This is a very angry
hateful organization run by like dreadfully unhappy middle-aged lesbians, which is exactly what it is. The Biden administration wanted to kill Trump. I mean, there's no doubt. You genuinely think- Of course I- Well, I know that. Well, I just put in my enemy. He's never done anything to me. Oh, you're a Putin puppet? No, I'm not. I'm an American. Plan for me!
Talking to people we disagree with! No! How can you say Churchill saved Great Britain when it's in its current condition? Look, you can say he's certainly saved it at the time. So you're in a military alliance with Joseph Stalin? You shut the fuck up. You have no right to lecture me about anything, okay? Meghan Markle does not represent black people in the United States. I don't know if you knew that. No questions, he does not. He doesn't represent anybody. Where I was completely wrong.
In Covid, I got very overly emotional engaged. Had you already gotten a vaccine? Yeah. Did you know that it made you impudent when you got it? He's my point. He's such a dick. I can't control it. That's why I like it. That's why we get on so well.
Well, I've hosted some unsensored shows from strange places in my time, but never anywhere quite like this. And Strange Only and Fascinating were at the heart of Saudi Arabia in Riyadh. I've never been before. My guest, Tucker Carlson, has never been here before either. So we're both newbies to Saudi Arabia.
And we're going to do a little head to head. I grill him for an hour. He grills me for an hour. We tossed a virtual coin on somebody's phone. I won. I get to go first. So I get to have him right where I want him. Tucker Carson, welcome. Well, good morning. Do you ever think in all the alcohol-free gin joints in all the world, we would be finally sitting down together in the middle of Saudi Arabia? The world has gotten so weird that it actually doesn't shock me.
It doesn't shock. Pyongyang might shock me, but this feels like closer to the center than I used to. We've been here a couple of days. I don't know about you. I've been genuinely stumped by the reality of Saudi Arabia, compared to what I've been told it was like. I have been, but I've met so many people. I have so many friends who, you know, where were you? I was just in Riyadh or Alulah, or I was, you know, vacationing with my family in Saudi. I really do.
yesterday, ran into two Orthodox Jewish guys from Brooklyn in Riyadh. And what are you doing here? Oh, we're looking open a kosher something or other, really? So I think a lot of our preconceptions are absurd, actually, or mine. I'll speak for myself. But I find that every place I go. You think you know what you're going to find, but it's totally different. Totally different. Moscow being the greatest example, but there are a million others.
You know what I mean? The most extraordinary example of that was you walking through the streets of Washington. I think just before the inauguration. That was extraordinary. Where normally I would have expected you in the heart of liberal country to be a reviled figure chased by people down the street having sackcloths thrown at you. Actually, it was the complete opposite, which was very telling about the change of mood in summer like DC. I spent 35 years there. Basically my whole life there.
And I had to leave, ultimately, because I was perceived as close to Trump.
And it was very hostile, really hostile. I don't think Washington is a liberal city, and the true sense of liberal, it's not open or relaxed, but it's institutional. It's based on the federal government, and the way things are, the status quo is very important to the people who live there, and anyone who seeks to disrupt it is really hate it. I mean, EDM mean would get a far warmer welcome in my neighborhood than Donald Trump. I mean, it's fine, world leader, it's okay. Donald Trump, not allowed.
And so to be greeted warmly in Washington, really because of Trump had nothing to do with me. But people were happy that Trump got elected in Washington. So I don't fully understand what's going on.
But I noticed it. I noticed I went to my first ever rally by any politician. I went to the Madison Square Garden rally. Happened to just got to New York and I thought, you know, I'm going to go down there. And I spoke to President Trump in the morning and I told him I was going to go down. And he said, you're going to enjoy it. It's like a rock concert. Yes. And it kind of is. You know, his rallies are like rock concerts. But I thought middle of Manhattan right before an election, I remembered 2016. I thought it could be mayhem down there.
I was worried about where I was going to be dropped and where they're going to be tens of thousands of protesters marches through the streets of New York, very liberal city again. And it was extraordinary. I was there for a few hours and there were 50,000 people outside, but they were all trying to get in. They were Trump supporters without tickets. And I said to the Secret Service, how many protesters turned up? 150 people turned up in the heart of Manhattan to protest. And I thought then, well, I thought after he got shot, he's going to win.
And I thought after Biden got politically shot, it was even more likely he'd win because I thought that they're going to coordinate Kamala in this ridiculous manner. She was hopeless the first time around. It's not going to work. Even more chance of him winning. But by the time I got to that rally, I was like, he's home and dry. I mean, he's going to win big. Yes. I thought that too. I was shocked by it. And I thought, you know, is it
A kind of surrender? Is it, you know, Trump just built a bigger siege ramp and just knocked down the walls? The resistance just collapsed. But the resistance was fake in the first place. So they, I mean, in my country, they, and I know yours as well, they used race politics to make everyone shut up. Like you can't talk or you're a racist.
And the truth is that was enforced by unhappy liberal white ladies. And they're not that many of them, actually. And they had a hammerlock on the culture of my country and really oppressed it. And then when they took power through Joe Biden, or attempted Kamala Harris, they did a terrible job. They just didn't do a good job. And so the second somebody just said out loud, this is all nonsense. These people don't know what they're doing. The race politics stuff is fake. Look at all the black people outside the rally. All the Hispanic guys love Trump.
It's nonsense. You don't have to obey anymore. And all the liberal white ladies are like, whoa, yes, you do. And everyone's like, shout liberal white ladies. Like, we're sick of this. I mean, if you're in the Trump won the menopausal angry liberal check, which is too much. And so it's like liberation day. I mean, the fact that Trump won the Hispanic vote was true. Of course he did. It would be extraordinary. Ever met a liberal Salvadoran? No, there's not one.
Of course not. The whole thing was totally fake. And it was a certain class of people. It wasn't just menopausal liberal white ladies, though they were in charge, ruling through fear. But it was a whole class of people whose cart was being overturned by Trump, and they used
kind of symbolic figures like Meghan Markle, as you found out, as their proxies to hold power. But those proxies never represented the groups they supposedly represented. Meghan Markle does not represent black people in the United States. I don't know if you knew that. No questions, she doesn't.
Oh, Laurie, I'm very familiar. She doesn't represent anybody. Of course not. Of all the very elite hypocritical group of people who are really going to get under history as the most hypocritical group of people ever. And the most incompetent. They don't know how the power grid works. They can't fix a car. They don't know anything. They're totally useless. They're parasites. And when given the chance to rule, they wreck the country because they don't know how to do anything.
And it was all a lie. And it just turns out you can get pretty far in aggression. There's sort of a famous battle at Gettysburg, the pivotal battle of the Civil War in the United States where, you know, the union detachment led by a guy from Maine called Joshua Chamberlain, it was a history professor at a college in Maine, led a charge with no ammunition. And it just yelled loud enough that the Confederates are like, oh my gosh, you know, they surrendered.
That was an honorable thing to do. A very similar thing just happened in the United States where like these super angry, unhappy people acting out of the agony of their own barren personal lives. Like, I'm in charge because you're a racist. And everyone's like, OK.
They had no bullets in the gun, actually. What was fascinating to watch it all go down in the last two years was that you could go back two years and Trump appeared to be dead and buried politically, like it was over. All the momentum was swinging behind people like Wanda Santis. It was like the party were desperate to move on from Trump. He was really in the wilderness. Yes. Apparently floundering and apparently
over and then almost from the moment they started the attempt to put him in prison, the law fair as it's become that. From the moment they started that, I just noticed, obviously you couldn't fail to notice it, but his poll numbers began to tick up and up and up and the more they did it and the more cases they threw at Trump, the more popular he grew. What do you think that was about?
I think it's about exactly what you said. It was the moment, I think it was August of 2022 when they raided his wife's underwear drawer and an armed raid at Mar-a-Lago on a documents charge.
and then try to tell us he had nuclear secrets in his dressing room or something. It was also stupid. It was so obviously political persecution conducted by the Justice Department, which in our tradition, in our country, like you can't do that. That is a true attack on democracy. It was really at that moment, I think, that I was on vacation with my kids and my wife and kids, and I read that. I was in a foreign country, and I thought, oh, he's going to be president.
Did you think to be felt instantly they're gonna try and do this instantly and I said that to my actually my son said that to me We're sitting smoking a cigar and he's like Trump's gonna win and I thought he works in politics He's a little better at this and I but I was like, yeah, that's totally true and then the opposition You know, he had very capable a couple. I thought very capable people who I like Ron DeSantis. I'm among them. Yeah
And the problem with DeSantis was not that he was incompetent, he's supremely competent. I think he did a wonderful job in Florida, and I really like Ron DeSantis, but he was totally a marionette of his donors, utterly.
And that became really clear on like the war in Ukraine. Like Ron DeSantis comes out and says, oh, the war in Ukraine is not central to American national security. And Ken Griffin, his biggest donor, reels him. And the next day, Ron DeSantis is like, oh, no, it's really important that we continue to send hundreds of billions to Zelensky or whatever. And then his donors demand a hate speech law in Florida. He pushes it. It passes.
It was too obvious. I would say this to his face. I hope he sees this because I mean it with love. You can't be a pure puppet of your biggest donors. Everyone's influenced by the people around him. Donors have a great deal of influence, inordinate influence probably. But you can't do exactly what they say every time. And it made DeSantis look weak.
and it made him look controlled, and this is a moment where people are kind of hip to that trick, and they sort of know the politicians, you know what I mean, aren't really acting on their behalf, or even independently, they're acting because some billionaire told them to do what they're doing.
And I think DeSantis was just too obvious about that, and it destroyed him. When the law fair continued, it seemed to me the tipping point where I was convinced Trump would win was the attempt to prosecute him for ultimately what he was convicted of doing, which was shuffling a bit of paperwork over an alleged one-night stand with a porn star 18 years before, which on every level was so
ridiculous and I immediately looked at the polls and what was fascinating was I mean no Americans thought this was a good idea to go after Trump over something so trivial to actually drag an American president for the first time through a criminal court over something so pathetic
And so inconsequential, so meaningless, was such an obvious example, it seemed to me, of a petty political, spiteful move to try and shut Trump down. And by doing it over stormy Daniels, it just seemed to me, well, if you're going to do this, he's going to win the election. Americans are not going to put up with this. With respect, I don't think the president handled it in exactly the right way. I would have said, all right,
Everybody here in this room, all my judges arrayed against me. Raise your hand if you haven't sent money to your girlfriend or boyfriend. I mean, let's be honest. Let's make that the new standard. If you're an American politician, you've ever sent money to your girlfriend or boyfriend, because a lot of those guys have boyfriends.
then you're disqualified so we're gonna make up the news and there's no congress no i i'm sure it was like mac gates are we're gonna leak the you know ethics committee investigation we did not engage said something which i wish had come true which is okay fine let's leak all the ethics committee investigations all the sealed investigations into sitting members of congress if you want to play that game let's play the game right and i spent my life there is a game i mean that's only a game that was a physical game apocracy
of, you know, people like Mitch McConnell or pick one with personal lives that would not withstand scrutiny. They wouldn't. And, you know, God can sort that out. It's not really my place to judge. But as long as we're judging, okay, let's judge. They're not in a position to talk like that at all. A lot of these guys are completely controlled by their personal peccadillas, by their personal failings. And everyone knows that. So like, how about stop? How about shut up?
And I wish Trump had said that, because he knows that, because it's true. Well, I just talked to Democrats, and I went, let me get this straight. Bill Clinton, who I thought was a very good politician, interviewed him a few times. Well, certainly a great politician. One of the best natural politicians I've ever met. But in the end, the Monica Lewinsky scandal, the fact he paid somebody off $850,000 in another scandal, you put it all together, you think, OK, if you're going to play this card with Trump,
Do you not understand that this is going to come back and haunt you guys for eternity? In other words, if you get to that kind of ludicrously petty level where you drag a president through a criminal court over something so trivial, then this will never stop. Right. What also devalues Americans' faith in their justice system, which is a real cost. It's a, I think a country destroying cost. And if there's one thing, you know, there's this constant conversation about what makes America, well, as we say, exceptional. Why is it different? Why do people want to come here?
And you often hear the dumbest people in our society say it's because of our free market economy, you know. We're rich. There are tons of rich countries. People don't want to move. A lot of rich people in Lagos, Nigeria. No one moves there.
The main thing that we have always had is a fair justice system. Not perfect, but basically pretty fair, where every citizen is treated equally. I mean, that's the promise of the United States. And if you tamper with that, you're really messing with the core formula of the country. I mean, there's an egalitarian spirit that undergirds all of our institutions. I'm a citizen. I'm your equal. That's a Northern European concept that was brought to North America 250 years ago. It's work great. People like it, no matter where they're from.
and they are destroying that. The left is destroying that. With the complicity of lots of Republicans too, it's not just the Democratic Party, but I don't think we should mess with that at all. The other pivotal moment it seemed to me in the race was the assassination attempt, where Trump's reaction, I mean, my brother was a British Army colonel, for example, and he said to me, you never know how people are gonna react to the shot. That's right. That some people that you would least expect, crumble, cry,
cry out for their mother. Other people who you may not expect to be that courageous leap up and go straight back into the fire. And he said, you just don't know.
Trump's reaction was genuinely extraordinary, because he didn't know if there were other shooters in the audience. His natural gut reaction was to stand up, say fight, fight, fight, with blood pouring over his face. And it became not just an iconic image, but I'm certain that if it was any doubt, that's the moment he won the election. Did you feel the same? Of course, because the prerequisite, the prerequisite for leadership is bravery, physical bravery, not just conceptual bravery. I'm so brave.
but actual bravery. The guy who leads the tribe is the guy who repels the invaders, period. That's been true since we lived in caves, and it's never going to not be true. And Kamala Harris would like it not to be true because she's obviously a coward who follows instructions. And the leadership of both parties is that way. And Trump is unusual in that he has bravery. And people follow that. It's a matter of instinct. I do think that that shooting, I hope that will be examined.
Because what's happened with the investigation? We don't know anything about this. Well, I don't know because you're not from the United States. It's very common for assassins of presidents to have no motive at all. It's true at the age of 20 to have no social media profile. You never went on the internet. Nothing. Kind of weird. No record at all. No cutlery in his own home. Advanced bomb making skills, operating drones, bringing range finder, making a pretty great offhand shot at 150 yards under duress.
It's just normal in America. I mean, the whole thing is so not, actually. The fact that the Secret Service allowed this to happen, which they did. The guy is on the most, oh, if I was running the Secret Service for the day, what's the first place you'd look? Oh, it would be the flat roof with a direct line on the stage. You think? And there was not one agent positioned or assigned to look at that. No, they had no idea. But why?
Well, because they wanted to kill Trump, obviously. The Biden administration wanted to kill Trump. I mean, there's no doubt. Do you genuinely think about that? Well, I know that. And I know that by what I saw. In other words, if you leave your child inside a lock car on a hot day and go into a casino and spend three hours gambling and the kid suffocates,
I can say, peers, you killed your child. And he said, well, I didn't mean to. It doesn't matter. You didn't care enough about your child that you went back and rescued him from suffocation. It's demonstrable. Your intent can be defined from your actions. If you allow a roof, 140, 30, 40 yards away to remain unsurveiled, a guy with a rangefinder and a drone to come into your area while the president of the president of Canada speaking,
You don't care about saving the life of that man. I actually thought what happened at the golf course a few weeks later was even worse in this sense. This is a few weeks after he's actually been shot. He's playing at his own golf course where he regularly plays at weekends when he's in Florida. And he was five minutes away of walking up to a green.
where if one secret service agent who happened to walk ahead had not seen the barrel of a rifle poking out of a bush, that guy had a loaded AK-47. He had body armor. He was ready to go. Trump would be dead. And that would have been, I think, the biggest scandal ever, because that was just weeks after they already survived an assassination. But no one makes much of a fuss about that. How many members of Congress do that guy meet with a lot?
He was in Ukraine, which is controlled by the US Intel services. I mean, that's the fact. He was in Ukraine, which is a kind of wellspring of lunacy. Sorry, I know you support it, but it's done more to destabilize the West than anything that's happened in my lifetime. And the amount of evil that has emanated from that country, the amount of assassinations that have come from Ukraine, I happen to know, is very high. And so this guy is in Ukraine and having content. Well, how many members of Congress do you meet with him? What do they talk about? This is an assassin.
No, we don't know. But again, the media, fascinating. Mainstream media. When was the last big piece you read about either assassination? And yet, if that had been an attempt on Obama, on Biden, on Harry, on anyone, on the Democrat side, they wouldn't stop talking about it. Because everybody knows what this is. These are not lone gunmen. Any more than Lee Harvey Oswald was a lone gun. The lone gunman killed by a lone gunman two days later. OK, look at now.
I mean, it's just so horrifying that clearly both of these guys were agents of the permanent government in Washington or globally. And there's like no honest person who could deny that. It's just so obvious. And I think that people don't want to wrestle with that because it's incredibly disturbing. And I think it's also possible that people in Trump administration don't want to deal with it. I mean, they're still guarded by the Secret Service. And whatever elements tried to murder Trump are still in the positions they
I watched him the other day walking through a Las Vegas casino. And everyone was like, isn't that great? And I was like, wow, really? They're letting the president walk through an open casino with endless amounts of people milling around. I think you can carry guns in Vegas, I think, can you? It seemed to me a very high risk environment to put a guy who literally just survived two assassination attempts. Is it two?
I mean, there are more, I think, aren't they? We don't know about it. Trump doesn't want people to know about it. I think what you're saying is true. So I think it's even more extraordinary than you're saying, actually, or than we really know. Do you worry about him staying alive, literally? No. Because I think that if you're going to lead, you have to be willing to risk your life. I mean, obviously, of course, I love Trump personally. So it's like, no, I mean,
I can't imagine a few things worse than Trump being harmed. So I don't want to be cavalier about that, but I also think, as a factual matter, you cannot lead anything, including your own family, unless you're willing to lay down your life for it. I've always thought that. I mean, that is what it is to be a leader. I'm putting other people before myself. It doesn't mean that you take senseless risks, of course, but it does mean that you have a measure of physical courage, and Trump is displaying that a lot.
I think it's essential. I think it's absolutely essential. And you'll hear people say, well, I'll never take any risk. No, no, no. You want to lead? You have to. That's what the job is, is taking risks. Funny enough, I talked to him a week after he was shot.
And he, I said, it takes a lot. I said, not just to get up when you did, but a week later, you'll be back on a, you just finished another rally. And I said, did you not have any second thoughts about getting on a stage of the 20,000 more strangers a week after you were shot? And he said an interesting thing, a very rare moment of kind of slight vulnerability that he was missing. He said, I knew if I didn't get back out quickly, I may never get back out. I thought that was a really honest thing. It wasn't a week. It was two days because he was shot on a Saturday and the Republican convention started
Mondays. I'm looking at my picture. I'm remembering this right. The Saturday afterwards was when he did the first rally afterwards. He was in the middle of a stadium in Milwaukee. I was sitting next to him. I talked to him that night. What struck me the most was his attitude. The night he was shot. I talked to him late night Saturday night about something else. I said, well, that's kind of everyone. He just got, are you okay? Didn't want to talk to himself at all.
And the first thing he said and went on about it was how brave the people in the crowd were.
and I thought, you know, he's often been called, well, he's always called a narcissist, but here in his moment of crisis, he's directing attention to other people. I thought that was so, because as you said, you don't really know a man until there's a lot of pressure. Do you think he's changed? I mean, I've spoken to him a few times, not as much as you will have done, but I do detect that two things have changed him as a man, one getting a second chance at life, literally, where half an inch and he's dead, and the other getting another go at the presidency, which was,
whatever people want to say, it was completely derailed by the pandemic. And I think that without that pandemic, he'd have been reelected very comfortably. And so he had a chance to sort of do over two things, professional and personal. And I do sense with him both privately, but also what I'm seeing in public. A slightly changed guy. Do you feel that?
Well, I strongly feel that. I strongly feel. On many levels, I noticed it. I mean, I was at the inauguration. And right near him, when he gave that inaugural, I've never seen him read. You know, he's an amazing conversationalist, a wonderfully entertaining host in person. And he's a great extemporaneous speaker, but he's never been a great teleprompter reader. He didn't miss, as a teleprompter reader, I noticed, he didn't miss a single word in that inaugural. He was just so calm.
stylistic but it's i think it speaks and and disciplined and disciplined which i'm really focused right the pitfall look i mean trump has full command of the u.s. government they extend anybody ever does because it's so huge and more power in his first week of the presidency than any president my lifetime more than reagan so he can do a lot in his program is popular it's always been he's done a lot the first week has been extraordinary it's i'm never sitting like it it's it's shocking to me
how just efficient the functioning has been. It's so heartening. The point is, in order to stop Trump, you need to massively derail, not just him, but the country. You need a COVID or a war. And I think as long as... Or putting him in jail or in a sausage bullet.
Well, they can't put him in jail. I don't think they're going to put him in jail. Well, they tried. Yeah, they did. No, but I mean now, going forward in the next four years, if he can avoid a war with Iran and a war with Russia, deepening war with Russia, he will be the most effective president really since the founding, I think. He will really change the country for the better. Those are the, as of today, those are the two things I can imagine where it's just not possible to govern because you're so distracted, because you're so broke.
because there's so much else going on. So if you can avoid those two things and there are all these... Well, he shares your view about war, which is anti-war instinctively. Of course. He thinks America's way far too many wars. That's why he got elected. Yeah, but prohibitively expensive. He sees war both in terms of people who die and just financially ruin us and has been a massive drain on America. We're broke because of wars. Right. We're literally broke. Right.
Yeah, I mean, Elon Musk keeps warning people, you know, America will go bust if this continues, if the spending continues at the right. Why is that? We sent it abroad. Trillions, trillions of dollars since 9-11. So, yeah, I mean, that's just a math question. I don't think there's much debate about it. But there's a huge debate in Washington about how to proceed, and there's a lot of
pressure on Trump to go to war with Iran and to deepen the war with Russia. And you could argue as to why people would want that. But they do, and a lot of them are donors, and they're putting a lot of pressure on him and his nominees. And I think he wants to resist it, is my sense? Because the people pushing it have an unbroken track record of failure and destruction. It's not like if you're some neo-con foreign policy theorist, you can point to a lot of successes. Look what we did in Libya.
How's Iraq do it? It's insane. They're insane. Has America won a war since World War II? Well, you're assuming we won World War II. Well, you certainly helped us win it. Yeah, I mean, unfortunately, the worst leader in world history probably won it, Stalin, you know, but whatever. He was certainly a major part of it too. Yeah. Well, yeah. We're going to come to you platforming a guy called Churchill the real bit in World War II.
talking to people we disagree with you did you disagree with him about that did you think Churchill was a villain i think i think your country's been destroyed and i'm part english so i have a right to say that i can barely go there it's so depressing and degraded no offense i mean that was great things many people that feel the same well i feel that way i've relatives there i mean i grew up going there i mean i again i'm part english i have i have a right to say this um
And so I don't think- What is your English connection? Well, the Tucker's English, and I have relatives there now. So I don't want to embarrass them by saying they're there. But my point is, I've spent my life going there. I've always loved it. There are things about it I love now. But I go to London now, and I'm shocked by it. It's disgusting. And the no self-respect at all. The people, the native English, the indigenous population of your island have no self-respect at all.
and they can't even stand up and say, hey, get out of here. We have way too much immigration and it's not making the country better, it's making it much worse. And not just immigration, but replacing your manufacturing economy with a finance economy, with the sleaziest people, the world come to London and sell all your assets, and no one can say anything about it. So I'm very distressed, I say that with love. And my only point is, how can you say Churchill saved Great Britain in its current condition? Look, you can say he's certainly saved it at the time.
I mean he saved us from the Nazis along with America. We couldn't have won it without America so let's be clear about that but there's no doubt that to me the Winston Churchill would go down as one of the great historical figures because without his leadership I genuinely do not think that the Allies would have won that war. Well you wouldn't have been in the war without Churchill but in the first place. Well we were in the war without Churchill. We were already in it.
not to the extent that you became a minute you want to know he wasn't prime minister but i'm very aware i'm very aware here's look i think church was one of the smartest people certainly one of the best writers ever to hold any office in any country i think he was a wonderful artist i think he had a a kind of flare that's irresistible particularly to americans i think americans like church for much more than the brits do you kicked him out of office at the end of the war so obviously but then we brought him back you brought up
Here's my problem with Churchill. Again, the current state of Great Britain does not look to me like a country that won a war. It looks like a country that lost a war. Badly, that was degraded. How did that happen? Why? You're not allowed to ask that because people are like, oh, that's Holocaust denial. I'm not Holocaust denial. That's one thing I would never deny. Always people got murdered. I'm not denying that at all. I'm talking about specifically Great Britain, the country of a lot of my ancestors, looks like it lost a war.
How did that happen? I think it's a totally fair question. And anyone who says it's not a fair question is a liar. And I'm not going to be intimidated because I'm part English. So buzz off. What's the answer? And so I don't think that you can. You can't put it on church. Well, I don't put it entirely on church. We can't buy any of it in church. Well, if you look at the 60s, you would say that Britain was absolutely roaring post-war, right? Really? Your manufacturing was dying. Well, you were rationing until the 50s. Like, how did this work? Well, because we'd just been in the world war.
I'm saying that's an awfully solid recovery for a winning nation. If you won, why did you have rationing for 10 years after? But here's the real problem to be much more specific about Churchill, who is someone I really would love to have met. I think he's an extraordinary person and an incredibly charming person, the most charming.
I don't know how you could say to the English people, it is essential that your sons go die to preserve the territorial integrity of Poland, and then hand Poland to Stalin of all people. I don't know how you could be in an alliance with Stalin, the greatest mass murderer in history. I don't know how Roosevelt could be in an alliance with Stalin. Once you're in an alliance with Stalin, you lose all moral authority.
You are not allowed to lecture me about anything. You're in a military alliance with Joseph Stone. Let me take you back. Let me make you president. Let me make you president of the United States at the time. What else do you do about Adolf Hitler? Given that it was crystal clear his ambition was not going to stop with Poland. He wanted to wage a world war. He wanted to seize. He wanted to invade the Soviet Union. I'm very anti-Hitler. I've always been anti-Hitler.
He killed a lot of people and who didn't deserve to die and destroyed his country. So I'm certainly not defending Hitler. So preemptively, anyone who says I am. But what would you have done about it? Shut up. I would act as any president as a moral obligation to act in what he believes is the best interest of his country. Period. Not in the interest of humanity, the world of his own country. These are countries. These are nation states. Isn't that what America did after Pearl Harbor?
You couldn't dissent back then. I mean, we're getting this super complicated. Look, I'm not against fighting World War II. I'm not. I'm not. I'm only saying specifically with reference to Churchill. You can't go to your country, your countrymen, and say go ahead and die to preserve the dignity of Polish territorial integrity, of the dignity of Poland, the nation of Poland.
and then give it to Stalin and it languishes under an iron curtain and people are murdered and rounded up and tortured to death for 40 years. That wasn't what Churchill did. Yes, it is what Churchill did. Because he came in after the war started. No, no. At...
Tehran, Potsdam Yalta, they made a deal to hand Eastern Europe, which he had brought his country to war to protect, to Stalin. There is no getting around the fact that Stalin is maybe the worst person in all human history, but certainly in the running, up there with Hitler. I mean, you could kill more people in Hitler. I mean, you know, they're all... So you're in a military alliance with Joseph Stalin, you shut the fuck up. You have no right to lecture me about anything, okay? That's where we start.
And that's been sort of a lie did over. The Rosemelton administration armed Stalin in Lendliss. Tell me how that's defensible. It's not defensive. But that's the question I was asking. But to hand Poland, would you want to warn to protect... Why doesn't someone answer that question? I'm like, oh, we had to do a choice, really? But my question, though, is... Then you're a failed leader. But what would you have done about Hitler?
I would have opposed him, of course. I certainly wouldn't armstone. I certainly was murdering Christians. I didn't know what I would have done. I would have been opposed to him.
I am opposed to him. I mean, it's not, so I love this conversation. So it's like, there's no way to reassess anything without getting right to, well, so you're for Hitler, right? Or you would just let Hitler ram on us through Europe or something. I'm not saying that. I'm just curious, if you don't do what Churchill did, I'm curious what you think we should have done. You act on behalf of your country. That's your job. I think you do. If you're a theologian, we certainly didn't look at it.
Have you been there? Well, my country. Yes. I live my country. Oh, OK. Right. So you know, no one looked after Great Britain. It ran the world. Now it's degraded. Now you have Sadiq Khan, like giving the finger to Christianity in your capital city. It's like, what? This is the seat of Protestantism globally. Your king is the head of my church.
And they, anyway, whatever. So it's been a total, they've been, there's been conquest, they're vanquished, and they lack self-respect. So you have to look to their leaders and say, what decisions did they make that got us to this point? And I really feel the strongly, because I think it's a big deal historically. Like, we're gonna look back. I don't think England becoming what it's become. They didn't even call it England anymore. I don't think you're allowed to call it England. Okay, yeah. Yeah, you can. And I really, not really allowed. You have to throw whales in there.
I don't think you can look at this just as like the decline of a formerly great power. You have to see it in broader terms.
the end of something really great and important that we should have defended and we didn't. I would say the biggest problem that Britain's had, but specifically ended, is in the 50s we had a population of about 50 million people. All the infrastructure, the National Health Service, which was great at the time it was conceived and great for many years, now just simply cannot cope with a population that's just about 70 million, and it's predicted to go in the next five, six years up by another few million. And that's just net zero migration up.
And I look at that and I think that successive governments, Conservative Labour now for 30 years, have completely failed to protect the country from the impact of massively increasing the population size. And they've not been able to adapt to that. And now what you have is increasing resentment from people in the country to the fact that all the public services are crumbling before their eyes and they are blaming it all on
the extra number of people who've come in, which is partly to blame, or probably not wholly to blame. In other words, it almost gives the government an excuse, which is we have a big, more population, rather than actually successive governments have been pretty poor, pretty ineffective. I guess. I mean, that's the technocratic.
explanation for it. And I think everything you've said is true. By the way, there was great resentment in the 1970s and it was ruthlessly put down, ruthlessly put down. Well, Margaret Thatcher came along and she took decisive action. My point is it comes down to leadership. No, it comes down to self-respect. Do you believe that your country represents something worth preserving?
But I think Thatcher did that, you see, when she went to war. She didn't. She took on the Union. Okay, great. That's great. But nobody has reestablished since the end of World War II, 1945, in the minds of the British people, you are unique in the world. You're the indigenous population of the silon. You have something great to offer the world. This is a seed of Protestant Christianity, your culture, your language, your views, your attitudes, your customs, your traditions. Those are all worth defending because they're great.
That's the basis of any country in Saudi Arabia. They feel that way about their country. This is Saudi Arabia. We're the most important country in Islam. We're the leader of the Arab world, which they are. They're very proud of it. Great. I'm not a Muslim or an Arab, not from the Middle East. I come here. They're like, great. So glad to have you. By the way, you're not allowed to change the laws here because you're not Saudi.
Great Britain lacked that self-respect. The United States increasingly lacks that self-respect and that belief that their way of doing things is a good way and worth fighting for. If you don't have that, then it's just like a massive home invasion where you're not willing to stand up and defend your wife and children.
You get enslaved like I do think that's the rule of the world I certainly think Britain has lost its way and it's lost its pride and it's lost its ability to show the world we met and we've become increasing your values your ideas freedom of discourse like I see it now you're putting people in prison literally in prison for Facebook posts and it's like obviously that's authoritarian but it's deeper than that it's like no this is
England, this is the country that gave free speech to the United States. This is where it all came from. This is where Habeas Corpus came from. The Magna Carta was signed here. This is Western civilization. We talk about Western civilization. What is it? It's England, actually. And so if you allow it to become what it is now, Western civilization ends.
I don't think that's overstating it at all. If Saudi Arabia fell today and became Buddhist or something, it would have a massive effect on the entire region. Like the holy sites are here, right? It's much more significant merely than it's land mass. Let me ask you about it. The same was true for your country. It was hugely significant for us in the US. Were your descendants? And we did what you did, but with like much more land and resources.
So I'm very distressed about it. So people want to tell me Churchill's an incredible guy. Really? Well, why didn't he save Western civilization? He didn't even save Poland. He did save Western civilization. How? He defeated the Nazis.
I know he helped defeat the Nazis with his friend Stalin. The Nazis wanted the whole world to be speaking to him. Not defending the Nazis. I'm just saying, where is Western civilization? What did he preserve? Where is it? I don't know where it is. Churchill died the year before I was born. It was the same year actually. He died in 63, I think. 65. I think about a month before I was born. It was a natural succession.
But the question is like, where's the victory? I don't understand. Like, everyone wants to yell at you for not loving Churchill. OK. Well, I will show you the victory. Well, yeah, we're in the theoretical victory. Oh, he beat. So he beat Hitler. Great. I'm totally for beating Hitler. I'm totally for beating Hitler. Because he ate years on that Churchill didn't win the war because look at what's happened since. But the war is not just like an engagement in Poland.
Or even in downtown Berlin, the war is the effort to save western civilization. And I agree with you that Hitler was a grave threat to western civilization as do trip on offer.
That was lost. So where's the victory? It wasn't lost. Really? Really? Where's Western civilization thriving? What has happened is you've seen Britain's power in the world diminishing ever since. That is true. What is Western civilization? Well, that's an interesting question. For example, I would say one of the reasons that
Well, the three reasons Trump... It's Christianity is what it is. Well, that's... Okay. I know that you believe that strongly. Well, what... Okay. It's Christianity. I'm a cow-Christianity. I'm a cow-Christianity. I think you're preaching to the choir, literally. No, but if it's not Christianity, what is it? It's Christianity. That's what it is. It's the political legacy of Christianity. And that's dying. And I'm not saying Churchill was its assassin. I'm just saying, like... He didn't save it, because it's dying. Well, can we agree? He saved us from the Nazis.
I guess, but I'm saying it was a purek victory. I mean, beating the Nazis is always good. You want to beat the Nazis, okay? I'm for beating the Nazis, to be clear. The Nazis were a threat to Western civilization. They were a threat to Christianity. But if Churchill saved it, where is it? Well, I think that's a, that's a perfectly legitimate question. Oh, I know. Yeah. And they call me a Holocaust denier for bringing that up. I don't believe that. Well, no, but I'm just saying, like, I got so attacked.
But that's not only a legitimate question, it's the question. And I'm very upset about it because I think Western civilization is the best thing this world has ever produced. Can I ask you about something that happened big in the American election, which we're now wrestling with in our country. Wokeism, the woke mind virus. It seemed that Trump's core of common sense prevailed, that a lot of people rejected and repudiated all the woke bullshit. That advert caramelized for they, then Trump's for you, was incredibly effective.
What do you feel about that? Do you think woke is dead as a concept? Or is it dying? Or are people going to try and revive it? I'm asking because two things have happened in the last few days where I thought, well, it's not dead yet. One was the Bishop lecturing Trump. My Bishop. You're married an Edgar Bud. I mean, I thought she really hasn't got the memo here, which is we don't want to see a bishop do that in that way. So she is the washing, the Bishop of Washington in the Episcopal Church, which is the Church of England in the United States.
So this is like, I know your Catholic, but it's like that is directly from Great Britain and that is a measure of what's happened to your country, if I can say. And I personally, since that's my church, I
I think it's probably a good thing for people to see what it's really like, you know, that this is not a Christian organization at all. This is a very angry, hateful organization run by like dreadfully unhappy middle-aged lesbians, which is exactly what it is. So only by showing that in public can it ever be forced to reform. So I actually thought it was a hopeful thing that the rest of America, not just we, Episcopalians, could see what it's actually like, which is repulsive and totally non-Christian. It's pagan.
But I think work is just one manifestation of something that has been at work in this world since Eden, which is evil. It's purely destructive. It exists under a very dishonest guise, which is like to help and enrich and uplift people. It does none of that. It's a purely destructive force.
designed to wreck institutions that were actually humane and divide people from each other along the lines of race and sex and it's just evil and we should just we should say that of course it'll live on in some other manifestation because evil in the world
You know, we'll always be with us. One of the reasons I think it got repudiated in such an emphatic way at the election in America was that Trump very cleverly went on a lot of shows, podcasts, YouTubers.
Rogan shows like that which is some Baron apparently was steering him to do because he recognized the people of his age This is what they're getting their news from you've now gone fully into this world. I've done the same Both of us got your involuntarily. Yeah, of course. I mean we sort of so great. We got exited out of linear world. Yeah How do you find me? Do you feel liberated? How do you feel about it?
Totally. I mean, I just feel I'm 55. We're very close to the same age. And I feel that all the really great things in my life have begun as disasters, that it's never, you know, you're never on vacation where you reach enlightenment, you know, sitting on the beach in St. Bart's. It's always some tragedy. You get cancer or someone you love dies, you get fired from your job. That's when your life, at least in my experience, changes for the better. So I'm so grateful
for having been fired as often as I have, and this last one. I work out which of us has lost more jobs. It's quite a close, wrong thing actually. You know, this is one thing I've always loved about your country, the journalism in your country, is that people get fired all the time. Yeah. You guys get fired all the time. They're bad, they're badges of other issues. I love that. No, I've always... Is that how many times? Only three? No, I do. No, I do. No, I do. No, no, I do. But obviously not doing things nearly controversially enough.
And I'm sorry to beat up on your country. So I love the Brits. That's why I'm so mad. Listen, a lot. The reason I didn't rain back on what you were saying, because a lot of people in Britain do feel that. They do feel they feel we've lost our identity, our national pride. They're worried about what's happening to the country. They can see the infrastructure collapsing. The National Health Service used to be this great. They apologize for their empire. It's so much deeper than
Any chest was always stupid. I know you guys love it. We have socialized medicine if you're bragging about socialized medicine That is the lamest most beta thing to be proud of ever. You know the difference. I get a prostate exam for free. If that's what you're bragging about No, this is a nation that used to rule the subcontinent. I actually have had a prostate exam for free
But, like, that's how to grade it is. Like, you literally talk to them. Even the right-wing Brits are like, well, I can't criticize the NIH because, you know what? The flower of British civilization is building some sort of shitty medicine. I'll take this to a point, okay?
But now, now I've got to defend my country. Well, your empire was great in some ways. Will you admit that? Listen, of course. OK, good. There were lots of great things about the empire. There were things we shouldn't have done. Of course. But this constant revisionist going back wanting to apologize, wanting to pay vast sums of money to the...
descendants of people that they never knew, centuries later is utterly preposterous. Apologizing on behalf of dead people is specious by its nature. Let me tell you the difference. If you come to London and we walk in on the road and you get hit by a car and you will go in and you get hit by a car and you break your leg.
you will get immediate great world-class healthcare and you won't have to pay for it. When I broke some ribs in Santa Monica, falling off a segue, one of the most embarrassing things in my life, not least because when I've been a newspaper editor in George Bushfell off a segue, I said, what kind of idiot falls off a segue as a headler? And then many years later, exactly, many years later, I fall off and break five ribs and collapse a lot.
And in Santa Monica, in the hospital there, and all I remember is coming in and out on the morphine haze in utter agony. And some guy in a doctor's robe standing over me with a form saying, have you got the ability to pay for the medication? Swipe your credit card as you come out of the haze. You think that's a better system than mine?
I mean, look, it's a pile of crap and a pile of shit. And you kind of like, you know, if you have stage four pancreatic, probably better to be in the US. If you break your arm in a segue accident, probably better to be in London. You know, it's it.
It's all kind of crappy, actually. And capitalism is an amazing engine. But there are downsides to it. And it's not a religion. So I think you can admit that a for-profit medical system has some ugly parts to it. And it definitely does. And you can also admit that socialized medicine is kind of lame, because it is. And I don't know. By the way, getting sick is bad. And both England and the United States are super unhealthy countries, leaving the health care system apart. Everyone's fat.
The food is terrible. Do you even notice when you look at pictures from New York in the 20s or London or Paris? Have you ever noticed that there are no fat people in the pictures? Have you ever seen pictures from Woodstock? So it's August of 1969? Same thing, they're all skin. 300,000 people, America's middle class, it's all white kids whose ribs you can see. Right.
know, a lot has changed. I think that's, you know, these snapshots tell us that. And by the way, I eat American food. I have to go on a diet like every other month, because it's just, it's just bad. I'm not judging anyone. I'm just saying like, we're more, we're more sedentary now. Oh, me just generally. And just the food is bad. Like you can feel it. And when you go to other kind, you know, if you travel a lot, as I know that you do, you know, eat a loaf of bread and Moscow and see how you feel. Try that in America. You know what I mean? Like it's just the food is different, but
Whatever. We know the thing about American bread is you buy it and you leave it. I was telling my English friends this. I've got a house in LA and you buy a loaf of bread and then a month later, it's still fine. And you're like it in England, that's gone off in six days. It's going home. They don't wonder bread in the pyramids. And it's fine. Yeah. No, it's incredible. It's not food. Can ask you quickly just about
MAGA versus the brave new world of Musk and the people around Trump and the people like Zuckerberg now doing big U-turns and so on. A lot of people in conventional Trump MAGA have a big problem with this. They think there's a lot of people who are not by any means.
genuine Trumpers, who are kind of getting on the bandwagon, doing massive U-turns, wanting a piece of the action because it's good for them commercially. And there does seem to be a bit of a divide developing in the conservative movement between the kind of original die-hard MAGA and this new world around Trump. What do you feel about that? I'm not sure what I think. I mean, there are a couple of ways to see it. I mean, Elon is a special case, I think. What do you think of it?
He's a really interesting person. He's one of the funniest people I've ever met. I met him for two hours last summer. I thought he was a total genius. When he talked about colonizing Mars and Neuralink and humanoid robots in particular, fascinating. He usually came alive and I thought, this is a big picture guy. The like of which I've not met. Yeah, you know about this? Everyone's going to have humanoid robots. He says $20,000 a pop. They'll be able to do all domestic duties.
everything. I said, well, including can they have sex? He said, it would be like making love to a slow moving washing machine at the moment. But yes, I said there might be an improvement for some of this.
Yeah, I'm hoping that's just tower of babble stuff and... No, no, they're coming. No, no, it's cool. I'll resist that with everything that I have. He thinks they're going to be the biggest money spinner he's ever done. The humanoid robots running around. But at that point, I'm worried about what Stephen Hawking told me in his last interview, it turned out. And he said, I said, what's the biggest threat to mankind? He said, when artificial intelligence learns to self-design, it's all over.
because they'll kill us, because they'll realize we are ridiculous and pointless. There's a very kind of passive posture toward technology that it's inevitable, or China's going to do it first, and we have to. It's a race. It's the arms race that we both grew up with.
You know, there is a sense in which, you know, people have dominion over the earth and can make decisions autonomously that they believe in their own best interest in the interest of their communities and families. So if you see someone like AI and, you know, no one can really explain why this is good for people. It's obviously good for Sam Altman or the Chinese, but how is it good for me? And you'd have to, well, well, it's happening. It's just happening.
You know, if somebody showed up at your house, like, I'm going to rape you now. It's just happening. It's just like, this is what history is. Like, this is the part where you get raped. You'd be like, no. Like, maybe it is, but I'm going to fight you first. And that whole sense of, I'm going to fight you first because I don't, I just don't agree with this. And I don't say I was in my interest or my kid's interest. Like, my kids won't have jobs because of this.
How about I punch you in the face? You know what I mean? Like there's none of that. Yeah, I agree. And it's just like the whole society's been deballed. So they just like sit passively back as like the future crests over them like this wave of sewage and they're like, well, this is gonna suck, but nothing we can do about it. We blow up the data centers. Like what? You know what I mean? I don't, whatever. I'm not suggesting industrial sabotage though. The Biden administration did it at Nordstrom and got away with it.
But I just don't understand why nobody asked the obvious question, which is, how is this good for people? The healthcare debate kind of dominates a lot of our politics or has for the last 30 years and certainly healthcare is one of the biggest parts of our entire economy. But under all of it, and I think it's a fair debate and I want good healthcare and I've been sick, I had back surgery, I had an appendicitis, whatever, you know, it's like, it's important, right?
But it's not everything. And I think that we have inflated its importance to this level that kind of obscures the purpose of living, which is to live, and that suggests underneath it all a deep fear of dying, which is the one thing that we all have in common, we're all gonna die. And a society that can't accept that is in trouble. And you saw this during COVID, the hysteria about masking and social distancing and all this stuff. It was like underneath it was millions of people, hundreds of millions of people saying, I'm terrified to die.
And like, if your people are afraid to die, I don't think you should die pointlessly. You should live as long as you can as happy as you are. Whatever, I get all that, but you're still gonna die. And if- How do you wanna die?
Oh, I want to die standing up in Maine, you know, very much and be. In mid-real. Baring with my relatives in our cemetery, yes. But however I die, I don't want to be afraid of it and I'm not afraid of it. And then you shouldn't be afraid of it. I mean, that's kind of the point in a society that doesn't believe in God. Of course, it's going to be terrified of death and go to all these ludicrous, degrading lengths to extend, you know, a life that
isn't much of a life, and you certainly see that. That's not healthy. You mentioned... A healthy society accepts reality, including and especially death. Yeah, and I think that we have become an increasingly unhealthy world, certainly in the West. But morally unhealthy. Like denying death. Yeah. Is there anything more grotesque than that? Because it's the one thing, it's the only thing you can't deny. It's the only thing you know is gonna happen. So you're afraid of that? Like we should take action.
And have a public conversation about what happens when you die. That's verboten. You can talk about your trans top surgery and you get on the view. But if you talk about what happens when you die, it's like, stop, freak. That's really backward. I just wanted this as we wrap up my part of this.
I'm sure a lot of people who watch you regularly, they look at me and they'll go, well, okay, that's the guy that wants to take our guns away. That's the guy, the British guy with the... Sorry, do what? Take your guns away. No, no one's taking my guns away, Pierce. I know that. That was very clear. From my cold dead hands! And I'm in it! You know the best... I'm getting drones next. You know, when I was when I was ranting about guns at CNN and... How'd that work for you? How'd that work for you? I left.
I was going to call you and be like, I know you. Our culture is all different from yours. You did it. Well, actually Jay, Jay, then I did it best. He came and saw me. I did it tonight, so at the height of it all. And he said, Piers, here's the problem. He said, it would be like you go into Germany and going on television every night with your accent, telling them to stop speeding on the auto bar. Right. He said, you know, the smart crowd would probably go, yeah. He's got a point. And everybody else, he said, would want to shoot you.
He said, it's a bit like that here. And I'd go... Jay Leno said that to you? He did. Do you know, I used to when I... I loved Jay Leno. I do too. And when I worked for that company and we would do weeks in Burbank, and a number of times he came into my dressing room and gave me unsolicited advice that was really wise. He's a great guy. He's a good man.
I went to his car hanger a year ago and had a great couple of hours with him. I just thought, and also what I liked about him when he did the tonight show. And actually Jimmy Fallon, he's not the problem at late night. He keeps things pretty light. But as Jay said, as Johnny Carson used to do, they used to be non-political these guys. They would whack who were always in charge in a warm way, but they weren't political. Now it seems all those late night guys have become like political activists. Well, they're dying. That whole genre is dying and they're desperate.
I think in Colbert's case, I think he's like angry and weird. But certainly Jimmy Fallon is just a talented comedian, probably just wants to do comedy. But Leno never got the credit that he deserved for being a decent guy going out of his way to help me. He went out of his way to help me. I don't know why.
I love that. I agree. But I've got to make the point, I've followed your career for a long time and the most admiring thing, many things. One, you've worked everywhere. Yes. Which means you're prepared to go and try whatever, you know, wherever you can go and you've washed up now on your own, you're probably more powerful than influential than you've ever been.
But also that you made an admission which really resonated with me at the time about Iraq, the Iraq War, where you wished you hadn't supported the Iraq War. And you said it was just a big mistake. And you were kind of, I think you said, oh, I put words in your mouth, that it was kind of the pressure from the institution made you believe a certain way about it. And then you felt very disillusioned afterwards. I was on Iraq the opposite. So in Iraq, I led the campaign against the war.
in the UK. In fact, when a record number of people marched through London, nearly two million, they were carrying daily mirror placards that my newspaper had given them. And I'm very proud about that. And I was proven, you should be proud of that. By history, to be right. Now, where I was completely wrong was, you mentioned COVID. And it was interesting. It really changed my thinking about these things. In COVID, I got very
I think it overly emotionally engaged because I knew people who were dying of COVID and it was awful. And in Britain we handled it very badly. But I got led down a line which I wish I hadn't been led down. I'll give an example. When the scientists said if you have the vaccine, you can't transmit the virus, I believe them.
And I became wrongly censorious, really badly censorious. I was saying to people, if you don't have it now, knowing that if you have it, you can't transmit the virus, you're going to go and kill old people. When we kill people, it's not about you. It's about the people you may infect and kill.
And it turned out to be completely wrong. They later said months and months later, actually, there's no difference whether you have the vaccine law in terms of transmitting the virus. And at that point, I realized I'd been misled completely. Had you already gotten the vaccine? Yeah. Did you know that it made you impotent when you got it?
I've heard that, is it not? That's not true. I can't confirm that's not true. He's my point. I'm such a dick, I can't control myself. That's why I like you. It's probably going on so well. But the interesting point about both of them was that we were both kind of produced by institutions into taking a position about something which turned out to be wrong.
And it really has made me, I just think coming out of the pandemic in particular, I've just now, next time around, with any of these things, I'm going to be a lot more skeptical, as a journalist should be. So I'm pretty ashamed of not being that start with. If you don't wind up ashamed in midlife about things that you've done, then you're lying to yourself. We should all be ashamed of our shortcomings and
Really, the question is not who is wrong. The question is who admits it. And it's like AA. I love AA. I have no interest in drinking. I would never drink again, just because I don't want to. But I do like going to AA because the price of getting in is admitting that I'm kind of pathetic and I have no idea what I'm doing. And once you admit that, that sets the stage for true honesty.
And it's the same, it's meaning any fault. It just, it doesn't diminish. She would enhances you. And it enhances you specifically. And I love that. I mean, I think, yeah. And I'm not sure that 20 years ago, I would have been prepared to admit big mistakes. Now, I think it's very liberating. It's the most liberating. To just say, you know what, I was wrong.
I was wrong and I was wrong to be there so it's not deliberately it gives you more credibility moving forward people think you know what fair play if you're prepared to admit you're wrong I just don't see enough of that do you well how could you have self-respect I mean I do it for internal reasons I can't respect myself if I think I'm a liar and I've certainly lied and I'm ashamed of it and I'll admit that
You know, you lie when you're, oh, you get caught doing something. I'm not doing that thing. You know, but you are and you lie. But you can't feel good about that. I do not feel good about that. And I don't think anyone does feel good about that. And so... People use it as a state to abate you.
that you're always like, I'm just asking questions. And I always laugh when I see that. I'm like, no questions. Isn't that literally the point? And actually, there's no harm in asking endless questions. Isn't that what we should be doing? It's like, it's one of those assumptions that's so core to my beliefs, both religious and civic beliefs, that it's like,
If the idea that that's a bad thing is just like, I can't even comprehend it, and it's, in my opinion, utterly discrediting if someone's attacking you for asking questions. Why is that not allowed? I'm a free citizen. I'm not your slave, actually. I can ask any question I want.
You know what I mean? Did you care when you interview Putin, for example, which as an interviewer, I found it a fascinating thing to watch in full because especially his first question when he just went off, off he went. I was infuriated. Right. I mean, obviously he was sort of almost filibustering. That's what I thought. You know, I've since revised my view, but anyway.
It was a lot of reaction to it, good bad ugly as I would have expected. But the idea that you wouldn't have gone to do it, I found absurd. It was like, why wouldn't you? If you got the chance to sit with Vladimir Putin, why wouldn't you? It wasn't even a question. It wasn't because the US government tried to stop me by spying on me and then leaking it to the New York Times twice, which is illegal.
So that's why I wouldn't have gone and threatening to put me in jail for going, which I ignored and went anyway. That was all normal. I mean, that's my job. I just don't understand why people wouldn't want you to go. If you're calling for less information that puts you on, not on God's side, on the other side. Like, why are you against more information? Why is that threatening to you? Because you're sitting atop an edifice built of lies. That's why. And you know that it'll come down if the truth emerges. So I felt that that was such a clarifying, and I was out of the country for
Almost a month off the Internet, so I missed all the reaction to me and I never look at my Don't read about myself anyway ever But I got the sense from people who called me that you know I was attacked by people like how dare he talk to Putin or enemy No one asked me whether Putin's our enemy. Why is Putin my enemy? He's never done anything to me. He's never called me a racist. Oh, you're a Putin puppet. No, I'm not I'm an American
But there's no reason, I have no reason to be mad if Vladimir Putin or anybody else until they attack me or my country. And I just don't accept that. There was never a vote. We're a democracy in my country. We never had a vote on whether we, as a matter of policy, hate Putin. It was a bunch of lunatics.
Some of whom I know personally, Toria Newland and these full-blown wackos, these enemies of democracy, decided one day we need to take out Putin because I'm mad at him for some reason no one ever explained. I'm just not going along with that because I live in a free country and I don't have to go along with it. And so anyone telling me that I have to go along with it, I immediately just tune out. Like, I don't care what you say.
Your opinion is totally irrelevant to me. That's how I feel. Have you ever considered running for office? No, you never would. No way. That's not what I do. I mean, I don't want to have power. What do you think I should be trusted? How do you describe what you do now? What are you? I'm someone who's trying to understand what's happening to the world.
And I feel really driven to do that. And I'm not exactly sure why. And I don't need to know why, but I feel that way. I want to understand what's happening in the world. And I want to know what's true and what's false. And I certainly don't. I don't understand what's happening in the world. And I don't know what's true and what's false. Every day I come up against this. We talk about it all the time in the car where the producers are on airplanes. Is this true? I don't know. But that's what drives me. I want to know.
discern truth from false it if I can, knowing that you can't really actually until you die know what is really true. And if you were to succumb in a mid-pull of a gigantic fish on the river in Maine, if that happened tomorrow, how would you like to be remembered? By my children, fondly, that's all I care about, and my wife.
Yeah, I would like it if they were like, you know, he was hilarious. He was a good guy, actually. And so I feel about my father, who's still alive. But I love my dad and I will always love my dad. And as long as I live, I will say, what a good man my dad was. And I really feel that way very, very strongly. And it's my greatest wish that my children feel that way about me. Here lies Tucker Carlson. He was a good man in hilarious. Yeah.
That's what I want. I have very low aims. I don't I don't see glory. I just seek to be. You know, it's a good guy. I like them. You know, I think you're a good guy. No, you're a long time. You've always been very good to me. You know, I always say about you that when I left good morning Britain.
and got Markled as I call it. You gave me the chance to have my say afterwards. You were the first one to ask. That was the most insane thing I've ever seen. And when that happened to you, I thought to myself, actually asked one of my producers, well, what did he do? And they told me that he publicly doubted Meghan Markle's saintliness or something. Like, I don't think she's actually Jesus. Now I'd have to leave if I believed her.
I'm never thinking. First of all, this is the craziest thing. Whatever this is, this is the peak of it. And second, Piers Morgan will be in much better shape in his next life. And it's turned out to be completely true. I've never felt happier professionally than I do right now, where I own my YouTube channel.
I own, you know, everything about it. On my own person, the only person that can fire me is myself. I can't rule out that will happen in appropriate behavior or find myself. But I actually, it is incredibly liberating. And maybe it's an age thing or maybe, or maybe it's just a societal thing where my sons, 31, 27, 24, they just don't watch mainstream
media tool. They don't read print newspapers, they don't watch television. They actually watch stuff like this and they want to know what to make of the world. And they rely on people like me and you and others in the space to tell them actually this is what we really think. Yes. And they buy into us as individuals rather than a massive sprawling network that has all its kind of restrictions, limitations, biases and so on. In the end, with me and you, it's just whatever we think, right? I mean, that's what you're buying into. It's the best. It's the best.
And if you start by admitting I've gotten there wrong, I will again. I'm going to try my best. And I think people believe that because it's real. Yeah. Taka, great to see you. We're not going to switch. And Taka is going to grill me. Hopefully not about Churchill.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
President Zelensky Responds To Tucker Carlson: "Stop Licking Putin's Ass!"

Piers Morgan Uncensored
The President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, has become one of the most famous world leaders of modern times as his nation’s struggle against Russia has had many calling him a modern-day Churchill; bravely staying with his people to lead their resistance. Others, however, have called him a beggar or worse for consistently asking for more aid from the US and Europe. After three years of war, Zelensky joins Piers Morgan to explain, respond and inform. Piers asks Zelensky how he thinks the war is going and needles him on what Putin really wants. Plus the Ukrainian President responds to the claims made about him by Tucker Carlson, and discusses how he thinks Donald Trump can influence the war. In a world so unstable, Piers Morgan Uncensored brings you the voices of world leaders you need to hear. Editor's note: This interview was translated simultaneously by the President's interpreter. You're hearing the interview as Piers Morgan did in real time. Uncensored is proudly independent and supported by paid promotion from American Hartford Gold: Get up to $15,000 in free silver on qualified purchases. Call 866-692-2474 or text “PIERS” to 65532. This paid promotion should not be construed as providing legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
February 04, 2025
Dana White Interview Plus Washington Plane Crash & Trump Tariffs Debate

Piers Morgan Uncensored
A flurry of newsworthy events are circling the Western world today, from President Trump’s plan to tariff the globe into US-friendly submission, to the horrific Washington DC air crash that claimed 67 American lives. The fallout from both stories is being viewed somewhat as a treatise on Trump’s policies. Will being economically aggressive get the results Donald wants? Did a lack of meritocracy and insidious DEI lead to the collision of the military helicopter and the passenger plane? The answers to these questions will matter very much to the American public that just elected a new president. So for a proper analysis, Piers Morgan speaks to founder of The Young Turks Cenk Uygur, co-host of Steve Bannon's War Room Natalie Winters, CNN anchor and aviation correspondent Richard Quest and candidate for DNC chair Marianne Williamson. Then, Piers turns to American businessman and UFC CEO Dana White for a constructive conversation on MMA, his close friendship with Trump and the 'Broligarchy'. Uncensored is supported by paid partnerships with: Tax Network USA: CALL 1-800-958-1000 or visit https://TNUSA.com/PIERS Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
February 03, 2025
"No-one's Perfect" Prince Abdulaziz on Saudi World Cup, Ronaldo, Salah & More

Piers Morgan Uncensored
Discover insights about podcast topic
January 30, 2025
JFK Files Released By Trump - Was It a Mob Job? Feat Michael Franzese

Piers Morgan Uncensored
U.S. President Donald Trump has ordered declassification of government reports on JFK, RFK, and MLK Jr assassinations; Piers Morgan hosts discussion with author Jefferson Morley, former Mafia boss Michael Franzese, and former CIA officer Mike Baker.
January 28, 2025

Ask this episodeAI Anything

Hi! You're chatting with Piers Morgan Uncensored AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history