Trump Goes to California and Hegseth's Confirmation
en
January 28, 2025
TLDR: Victor Davis Hanson and Jack Fowler discuss Pete Hegseth's nomination fight, US Naval Academy issues, Elon Musk's salute, Trump's resistance against bureaucracy in California, Karen Bass' radical past, pardons, and Mike Pompeo's special consideration.

In this episode featuring Victor Davis Hanson and cohost Jack Fowler, the discussion covers a range of political topics, notably focusing on the challenges facing Pete Hegseth's Senate confirmation, Donald Trump's recent visit to California, and other pressing issues. Below is a concise breakdown of the key points and insights shared during the episode.
1. Hegseth's Senate Confirmation
Key Votes and Controversies
- Pete Hegseth's confirmation faced pushback from three Republican senators: Mitch McConnell, Lisa Murkowski, and Susan Collins.
- McConnell's dissent raised eyebrows since he previously supported candidates more liberal than Hegseth, questioning the rationale behind his vote.
- Both Murkowski and Collins had voted for less qualified individuals in the past, highlighting a perceived double standard in their opposition to Hegseth.
- The episode illustrates a fracture in the Republican Party, where personal and political vendettas can influence critical nominations.
What’s Next for Hegseth?
- If confirmed, Hegseth is expected to focus on military recruitment, reduce the impact of diversity initiatives (DEI), and prioritize procurement strategies that emphasize cost-effective solutions.
- Hegseth's priorities suggest a shift toward more traditional recruitment strategies that appeal to a broader demographic, especially among those who serve.
2. Trump’s California Visit
Engagement with Local Politics
- Trump confronted Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass during his visit, emphasizing issues surrounding wildfire management and state water resource mismanagement.
- The dynamics of their discussions reflect ongoing tensions between state and federal governments, with Trump advocating for more immediate action to help those affected by wildfires.
- Trump's comments regarding voter ID laws underscore the political battles around voter registration and the implications for future elections in California.
State Water Management Issues
- The conversation highlighted Trump’s critiques of California's handling of water resources, arguing that inefficiencies exacerbate drought conditions and wildfire risks.
- Newsom's claims about reservoir capacities were challenged, emphasizing a disconnect between political rhetoric and on-the-ground realities affecting residents and farmers.
3. Discussion of Pardons and Political History
Pardon Policies and Comparisons
- The episode delves into Joe Biden's controversial pardons, particularly highlighting clemency granted to Adrian Peeler, a convicted drug kingpin.
- Comparisons are drawn between Biden's history of pardons and those of other presidents, noting how distinct political goals influence these decisions.
- The discussion raises ethical questions about pardons that intersect criminal justice and political allegiance, illustrating how certain figures may exploit this process for political gain.
4. Other Political Figures and Challenges
The Role of Fauci and Bolton
- The conversation touched upon the security details of figures like Anthony Fauci and John Bolton being removed by the Trump administration, raising questions about accountability and access to protective measures.
- While Fauci and Bolton had substantial political profiles, the hosts discuss the implications of their security being tied to their political affiliations and actions.
Impact of Public Perception
- Insights are shared regarding the challenges conservatives face in public perception due to biased media scrutiny, especially in framing narratives about key political events and decisions.
Conclusion
This episode of the Victor Davis Hanson Show offers a detailed analysis of current political events, particularly concerning Republicans' internal conflicts, Trump's influence on California governance, and the complexities surrounding presidential pardons. The discussions encapsulate critical issues affecting the bureaucratic landscape in the U.S., challenging listeners to consider broader implications on policy and governance as the political climate evolves.
Was this summary helpful?
Question. Ever wonder how much of your personal data is out there on the internet for anyone to see? More than you think your name, contact info, social security number, and home address, even information about your family members, all being compiled by data brokers and sold online. I recently found a solution. It's a great service called Delete Me.
Delete Me is a subscription service that removes your personal info from hundreds of data brokers. Delete Me isn't just a one-time service. Delete Me is always working for you. Constantly monitoring and removing the personal information you don't want on the internet.
Delete Me sends you regular personalized privacy reports showing what info they found, where they found it, and what they removed. To put it simply, Delete Me does all the hard work of wiping your and your family's personal information from Data Broker websites. I just signed up, it couldn't have been easier, and as soon as I hit submit, I felt what you'll feel. Relief
and even a sense of justice. I've taken control of my data, take control of yours, and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now at a special discount for our listeners today, get 20% off your Delete Me plan by texting VICTOR to 64000.
Text Victor to 64000. That's Victor to 64000. Message and data rates may apply. See terms for details.
Hello, ladies. Hello. Gentlemen, this is the Victor Davis Hanson Show. I'm Jack Fowler, the host. You are here to listen to Victor, who's the man with the wisdom. He is the Martin and Eli Anderson Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution and the Wayne and Marcia Buskey Distinguished Fellow in History at Hillsdale College. Victor has a website, the blade of Perseus. It's addresses VictorHanson.com. Later in the show, I will tell you why I believe you should be subscribing
Victor, I feel the last time you and I spoke was a week ago and I feel like a year has happened in these last seven days. So much dramatic Donald Trumpism has gone around the world. You and the great Sammy Wink have discussed
much of this, but there's still so much to get your take on Victor. Actually, I think we should begin the show today by talking about a vote in the Senate for Pete Hegsett's confirmation and how of all people in Mitch McConnell voted against that. We have that, we have Donald Trump in California, the Musk salute
The removal of security details for Fauci, Pompeo, Bolton, and some more talk about pardons. And we'll get to all of this, Victor, when we come back from these important messages.
Before we continue, I want to tell you about a great American company we trust, American alternative assets. Like many of you, they understand what's really happening to our nation's financial strength, and they're helping patriotic Americans protect their retirement savings. As someone who studied American history for decades, I'm concerned about what I'm seeing. And for the first time ever, our great nation is spending more on interest payments than on our military.
That's why I asked our friends at American Alternative Assets to share their Wealth Protection Guide. The guide explains why smart Americans are moving their retirement savings to precious metal IRAs. These are true patriots who understand American values.
Right now, they're offering our listeners up to $10,000 in free silver plus a free American made safe. They'll show you how generations of Americans have protected their wealth during uncertain times. Visit victorlubsgold.com and tell them victor sent you support an American company that puts American families first.
Ever wonder how much of your personal data is out there on the internet for anyone to see? More than you think your name, contact info, social security number, and home address, even information about your family members, all being compiled by data brokers and sold online. I recently found a solution. It's a great service called Delete Me.
Delete Me is a subscription service that removes your personal info from hundreds of data brokers. Delete Me isn't just a one-time service. Delete Me is always working for you. Constantly monitoring and removing the personal information you don't want on the internet.
Delete Me sends you regular personalized privacy reports showing what info they found, where they found it, and what they removed. To put it simply, Delete Me does all the hard work of wiping your and your family's personal information from Data Broker websites. I just signed up, it couldn't have been easier, and as soon as I hit submit, I felt what you'll feel. Relief
and even a sense of justice. I've taken control of my data, take control of yours, and keep your private life private by signing up for Delete Me. Now at a special discount for our listeners today, get 20% off your Delete Me plan by texting VICTOR to 64000.
text victor to 64000. That's victor to 64000. Message and data rates may apply. See terms for details.
We are back with the Victor Davis Hanson show. We are recording, by the way, on Saturday the 25th, and this particular episode will be up on Tuesday the 28th. Folks, we know a lot happens in three days. A lot happens in one day in America now, but we always catch up with Victor's take on what has transpired. So, Victor, let's commence today with Mitch McConnell. Now, just the plain old
Senator from from Kentucky no longer a member of the leadership, but damn he seems like a man filled with with a spite he voted against Pete Haggsett's confirmation to the Senate Pete was confirmed when the Vice President cast a tie-breaking vote Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski to two other Republicans who voted against him Victor you have some important thoughts to share on this
Yes. There were three Republicans, Murkowski from Alaska, Collins from Maine and Mitch McConnell from Kentucky. They all voted against Pete Exett and they're all sort of in a different category.
Take Lisa Murkowski first. She would not be representing. There's a Republican, as you know, Senator in Alaska. She's the other quote unquote Republican. She's not really Republican. She's only there because she engineered through her allies this rank voting.
that is unlike almost any other place. And it's designed to elect people with more minority support by playing off other candidates, which that sometimes in collusion, they run to the benefit of the person who is going to be adventaciously favored by this rank voting. Number two is she's got to make the argument
that she has a consistent record, a prescient, principled record about rejecting nominees for high cabinet posts. So let's just go back in the time machine four years ago. She voted four Pete Buttigieg, and she had heard him the entire primary debates of 2020, what all of the things he said, all of the things he said,
going into speculation that he would be the Transportation Secretary about racist clover leaves and all of this DI, and she voted for him. She also voted as, and by the way, Susan Collins did too.
Deb Hyland was the Interior Secretary. All we heard from Biden was that she was a first Native American woman, first woman, but we didn't hear about what she had been promoting her whole life and what she tried to do to reify that advocacy once she was.
the Interior Secretary. So what was it? She wanted to cancel all pipelines. She wanted to ban all fracking on federal lands. She wanted to ban all new federal leases for oil production. She got a lot of that through.
And that was to the detriment of the people of Alaska and to everybody, because this was at a time when she was in that prices spike here in California. I remember distinctly filling up for $5.80 a gallon, but 21, 22. And that was only broke when Joe Biden decided to dump 2 million barrels a day on the domestic market by pumping out of the strategic reserve. And by the way, everybody,
Joe Biden took a reserve that was 80% I don't know what it was 650 barrels 650 million barrels and he took it down by 40%
at a time when we had, we meaning the American people had been benefited because Trump had filled it up with cheap oil. So then Joe Biden took it down and now Trump's going to have to spend a lot, multi-billion dollars to fill it back up. He did that to win the midterms and say that gas had gone down. So you tell me that the logic, Deb Holland, why is it okay to re-pump oil out of the ground, but it's not to pump it out the first time.
Then we go to Collins, and so she voted for Buttigieg, she voted for Holland, and then if we go to the Secretary of Defense, she's saying P. Hexith, who was a decorated veteran who saw service at Guantanamo in Iraq and Afghanistan, she says she voted for Lloyd Austin, as did the other two.
Lloyd Austin went AWOL for about seven days. He didn't even tell anybody where he was. If you're a private and you have an emergency, let's say appendix or prostate problem, and you just stay home and go to your doctor and take care, you're going to be courtrooms. You really are. And so I understand he was ill, but he has to set an example. He was the person in charge as DOD secretary of the worst
military humiliation of American history at Kabul. Never have we left so quickly in such chaos, not even in 75 from the Saigon Embassy roof. We left 50 to 60 billion dollars. We turned over billions of dollars of infrastructure to terrorists, the Taliban. We left a billion dollar embassy, a remodeled 300 million dollar priceless background airbase. We did all of that. He was the general that
was there and he did not tell Joe Biden don't do it.
he went along with it. He can say what he wants afterwards, but he didn't make a principled effort to stop that. So, and they, Collins and Murkowski voted as well for Austin. So I don't understand how they're saying that Pete Hexath is unqualified as a conservative, but Lloyd Austin was a great secretary of defense or that their judgment about him was confirmed when he
served or Pete Buttigieg was a great transportation or they were shocked that that he thought he was, but he wasn't or Deb Hollen. I could go on with other cabinets. So then we come to Mitch McConnell. He's a little different. He voted
I don't remember, but I don't think that he voted to confirm Deb Holland, but I may be mistaken. So why did he vote? And you could take it two ways, Jack. You could say, once Collins and
Murkowski were informally known to be opposed to Pete Hexett. I don't know what would be. He circulated among the senators and wanted to know if Tillis was going to vote against it. When Tillis said no, he was at the last moment he was going to vote for Hexett, then I think Mitch might have thought home.
I can make a principled vote and opposition to Trump, but I won't be blamed because I know it'll be tied in JD Vance. That's the charitable. The uncharitable is that he wanted to stop Pete's exit and embarrass Donald Trump for
past sites, insults, going back almost a decade. And that goes back to the remember when Trump blamed Mitch for the collapse of the effort to repeal Obamacare, that Mitch had assured Trump that they had the vote. So then they basically carried McCain in and McCain just who had campaigned for reelection on repealing Obamacare. It turned out that he hated Trump more than he disliked Obamacare.
and voted to extend it. So it was very disappointing to see that happen, but Pete was confirmed. And the question is, what will he do? I think he'll do three things very quickly. He will look at recruitment and he will stop the farce that when the military is short, 30, 40, 50,000 soldiers,
then the next year they say, well, you know what? We were looking at our military needs and we really didn't need 30 or 40. And guess what? We met our recruitment. But when you look at the actual numbers, they're shrinking. And I think he will stop the DEI that turns off white males who, as I keep saying, have a record of dying at twice their numbers in demographic. But if you go and add after add after add, not about people jumping out of a helicopter,
All different races of all women men women and you say all you can be if you get rid of that and just stress. I'm the first woman. I'm the first gay. I'm the first trans and all about this is a pregnant flight suit. Then you're going to turn off people because they feel they will not be promoted or retained or evaluated in a democratic fashion and then I think he's going to look at. The procurement and I think he's going to learn lessons from Ukraine and.
the Middle East that while it's valuable to have $5 million tanks and $14 billion carriers and $150 million F-22s in a conventional fight against a superpower like China, you
you could get a much bigger bang for the buck and that would be by buying not five six ten million dollar groans but. Thousands of cheap things and put them on grown platforms at sea and very lightly man and just swam the zone and i think he's going to do that.
I think he's going to tell Raytheon, General Dynamics, Lockheed, Northrop. Look, you're very valuable, but we're going to have to stop this where our generals revolve out of the Pentagon and then they go to work for you.
And then they call up their former subordinates and advise them that their particular high ticket item is better than their competitors. So we're going to still deal with you, but we're going to put some kind of sunset law that when you leave the military, you cannot be a defense contractor or lobbyist. And he was asked that directly, and he didn't answer it because he just cut
He cut off Elizabeth Warren. I think she had a point, but he cut her off brilliantly. And he said, I'm not a general. Said, are you going to go out and rotate? And he said, I'm not a general. But I don't think he will when he leaves anyway. We'll see. And I think he's going to favor these startup companies, Andrew and all these other ones that we see in Southern California that are saying, we can do far more hypersonic, laser, drones, AI, all of this stuff. Just give us a chance.
So I'm very happy that he got confirmed. One final footnote, there was not one single Democrat that voted for HEC Seth, and there will not be one single Democrat that votes for Patel, and there will not be one single Democrat that votes for Pam Bondi, I think, maybe one or two. When you go back and look at the voting records for the Biden nominees,
They were all like Marco Rubio. I mean, pretty much the Republicans voted overwhelmingly with the exception of Deb Haal and that was a little close, but it was still, there was still a lot of Republicans that voted for her. So it should remind us as we see in the House Wars that the
Democrats have an ironclad rule, and that is whatever your ideology, if you can be a Marxism in the squad, you can be so so-called vestigial blue dog Democrat, you can be anything. But if you don't vote,
The way their leadership tells you to vote and you don't have ironclad solidarity, then they're going to punish you. They're going to punish you by not appropriating federal funds to your district or your state. They're going to punish you by raising the prospect of primary new with a candidate. They're going to cut these vote blue fund for you and drain off your campaign. They're going to do anything.
And they have put the fear of God into all of these people, and they vote lock, stock, and barrel. Not suggesting that Republicans use those terms, but until they get that type of discipline, they're going to need a much bigger margin than they have now.
Well, hopefully the Democrats won't have any nominees for several decades. I have another thing or two to raise with you about Murkowski and Pete Hegset, but first I want to pause to tell our listeners about a critical intelligence briefing, our friends at American Alternative Assets,
have just released as someone who studies threats to our Homeland Security, what I've read in Homeland 2025 concerns many of our own concerns. Their gathered analysis from former CIA officers, excuse me, they've gathered analysis from former CIA officers about what's really happening with our borders. But more importantly, they explain how to protect your family's financial security. Central banks are already taking action. Why shouldn't you?
American alternative assets is offering our listeners this vital briefing plus up to $10,000, up to $10,000 in free, silver, and a secure American made safe. These are patriots we trust to help protect American families. Visit victorlovesgold.com and tell them, Victor sent you, Victor, you love gold. I know you do. I love liquid gold too, as don't come to liquid gold liquid gold.
You love golden raisins, too, as well. Yes, I love the soul for golden raisins. Yeah. Hey, two things. One about Pete, you know, I know Pete a little. I think it would be fair to call my friend. I am very fond of him. I had him on a national review cruise once. I don't know if you were on that one or not, Victor, but he, we had a thing three mornings at 730 and it was called the Burke to Buckley program. It was very. I was on it. I was on it. I think it was living. Was he living in Florida then?
No, I think he came I forget where he came from see brought his dad with him who's a great guy I love the guy, but he was there every what every one of these sessions you really a scholarly guy So I think that's important to note and that leads me to hope he would amongst the things that he would be taking on as a reform of the curriculum of our military academies I think he would be surprisingly positioned to do that because he does care deeply about
about these matters. I was at one time, I mean, I was the Simon Visiting Professor, Pepperdine, I was a Visiting Professor, and School of Public Policy at Pepperdine, I was a Nimitz Professor visiting at UC Berkeley.
I taught a year as a Schifrin professor at U.S. Naval Academy and I'm the Buttsky professor at Hillsville. I know that these are sin right, but I have never
never. And I've spoken at maybe over 200 universities in the last 45 years. I have never been in a more left wing environment than the US Naval Academy of 2002 and 2003 really was. If it wasn't for two or three really great friends I met. I just encountered a hatred there of the Bush administration, George W. Bush,
And me in particular, I was really shocked about it. And I didn't, you know, I tried to be collegial, but I just couldn't believe some of the faculty presentation. Then some of them by militant. I'm not saying that was all true. There was maybe eight or 10 really good people. But there's a problem when you have
set up like the Naval Academy that emulates a private university, and then they rotate people in from the military that have PhDs that want to teach there, and then you hire 60% or 70% of the faculty out of the civilian pool,
So what you do is you get this tenured civilian group of leftists, because all professors are leftists. And then you get military people that want to stay there as professors and be tenured by civilian leftists. So then that modulates what they say and act like because the civilians do not want a hardcore conservative military person teaching. And the irony was that most of the students were very conservative.
So they have this kind of coded, I don't know, anger, resistance at the faculty. I don't know if it's changed in 22 years, but I was just shocked when I went there. I was shocked. And I probably
I mean, the professorship gave some funds so you could invite people in that particular chair. Not a lot of money, but you wanted to get. So the last two people had not invited very many people. So I took it very seriously. And I called up a lot of people to speak and do it for the government in the sense of don't get the regular honorarium.
And at that time, I tried to be ecumenical. So I had Max Boot. He had a master's degree. He wrote about whatever one thinks about the new Max Boot.
At that particular time, he was an up and coming historian. He'd written a book on irregular warfare. Most of his scholars, I don't like the new Reagan book, but there are many books he wrote that are very good. And he came and he was the editor of the Wall Street Journal page. You remember that? At a very young age. And in any case, I had all these people say, he can't come.
He doesn't have a PhD. He's too conservative. And then I had Don Kagan. Don Kagan said, you know what? I'll come for almost nothing. He came down. Oh, Don Kagan was here. Well, he had just written this great book, The Causes of War, you know?
I thought that they would welcome that this I had revived this lecture program that had been inert under the prior and they didn't the faculty so it was very hard to bring the people had people. I just left there and then i think i told you there was a very wonderful person there who. Had been a graduate.
He was in the reserves. He went to Iraq. He was an Arab linguist. He was offshore training people how to interrogate. And he came on shore, I think into one of the hotspots. I don't want to give any information that might reveal his identity. And he was tragically killed. Kind of a fluke incident going and I
This professor came up and basically said you're responsible for killing them because you supported the Iraq war and I said I like to give some I don't want your we don't want your money to the So I left very angry about it. Yeah, and then I remember the late Don Rumsfeld called me Instead I hear you're at the the naval camp. We got a big problem there, and I'm gonna reform it and
I said, I don't think you're going to reform it. You're not going to reform it. It's just not going to happen. You're going to have to go back to the Air Force West Point. And I said, you've got to understand that for an academic
coming into history or English, and the idea that you live near Washington, D.C., but not in Washington and beautiful Annapolis, and you have the prestige of saying you're a professor at the United States Military Academy. And third, you know that it doesn't work like West Point or the Air Force Academy. In other words, you can get tenure and a lifetime appointment, and the majority of faculty will be like-magnated leftists like you.
And the people who will gravitate to the military will be sort of independent thinkers in the military and brave, specky, you know, intellectuals, not your, you know, blood and guts, patent type. That's not going to change. And he said, I can change. I said, no, you can't. You cannot change that. And he, I remember he called me up later and he said, I looked into this.
This can't go on someday after we're all gone. He said it can't go on. And I don't know if they've made changes or not yet. Well, I hope PDP looks into it. I think he looks at the end of that. I really do.
One other thing about Murkowski, it's not funny, but her, she and her dad, remember her dad? Yes, I do. He was a senator, and then he was governor, and he lost a primary to Volpe, Sarah Palin, in 2006. And then Lisa Murkowski lost her primary to, what was it, Miller, I forget his version, in 2010, and then she orchestrated a write-in campaign, mostly through the Eskimo tribes.
However, I'm sorry native of arrogant. I'm not sure how you say it anymore, but then She won again in 2016 2022 and as you mentioned she had the What do you call it the second place third place rank voting? Yeah a lot of the rank voting believe it or not came out of the Hoover Institution We had scholars who really pushed that and I never understood why that was
I think that she is a clearly a woman with tremendous resentment of conservative Republicans for what they did to her family. Remember her dad had the land, the bridge to nowhere? Her dad had the land on the other side of the bridge to nowhere. I don't know. It was the same thing with Mitt Romney. When he ran twice, he made his hodge to Trump Tower. Remember that? In 2008 and 12, we get Donald Trump as a private citizen's endorsement.
And then he waged this really bitter campaign against Donald Trump and even though he wasn't a contestant in 2016, people went to Romney and said, you're the senior Republican of the party giving you our nominee in the last election. You have to use all your intellectual talent and courage and independence to blast this man. And so he went on a
Remember that campaign in 2016 where he said, Trump University, Trump Stakes, Trump Wiscuits, all fake, everything he just went crazy. And Donald Trump to pay him back, I think it was a mistake, but Donald Trump to pay him back said, I don't, I don't carry grudges. That's largely true of his, his transactional. So then he said, Secretary of State, I hear Romney wants it. Remember when Romney went all the way up there?
And he actually went through the, he was never going to appoint me. But Romney made it clear to the world that he really wanted something from the man that he had insulted and tried to destroy. And number two, didn't catch on what was going on. And once that happened, then he ran for Senate and Utah and Trump, again, is transactional. He thought, you know what? I need that vote. So he endorsed Romney.
And then Romney turned out to be the leading Never-Trumper in the Republican, almost always voted against Trump. Well, that scene that went making him a way to... I think that we're eating dinner together. I almost picture Trump having food in front of him and Romney not, but that the Secretary of State begathon. It was kind of cruel. Anyway, hey, Victor, let's move on and talk
Get your thoughts on because we have a lot to get to on California and pardons and other things But maybe quickly this controversy about Elon Musk and the Nazi salute Which is one of the few things that left us seem to be grasping on to and trying to make into a major scandal I noted that I note that Benjamin Netanyahu came out with a strong phrase
uh for uh elan must you have any thoughts about this uh weirdo controversy yeah i mean elan obviously went something he was excited at a crowd so it went like this to like touch and he goes
like this, and they said he paused too long here. But that died very quickly because everybody started showing these things from Elizabeth Warren, from Barack Obama, from Hillary Clinton, even AOC. So then he tweeted something, because they kept at him, and he tweeted something about pronouns.
And he'd used all of the worst Nazis sort of like, oh, do you think I'm boring, like, guarding? Or should I say him or he, him, and he did this word game. And then they went back to the anti-deformation lead in Jewish organizations and said you were wrong to support him and say it wasn't a salute. Now he's making fun of the Holocaust. He wasn't.
He was making fun of the Holocaust in a way if you have to prove the way the left and trivializes Hitler and say you're hit or you're not see, or general Hayden said, oh, Donald Trump is setting up Auschwitz cages. So then they went after him. I think the subtext is.
They see him as an asset, the left does, and they have that asset. And then they look at, in the left's wing mind, remember everybody, that what they do is exempt. They often project things that they do that are unlawful or unethical onto the left because they feel that they're exempt. So it's perfectly okay for Mark Zuckerberg to infuse $419 million.
into the 2020 to absorb the work of the registrars are for George Soros to put in 60 billion. But you better not be Elon Musk, 60 million. You cannot be Elon Musk and spend 300 million dollars in the swing states. So they detest him for that. So now what they're doing is they're trying, I went through the Daily Beast, all of the left-wing sites, the drug report, which by the way is one of the hardest left ones. There is now.
People can speculate why, but I think it's personal pick at the Trump family. But nevertheless, when you go through them, now they're playing up that Sam Outland, the guy with the AI, he and Musk are arguing, and there's a story that Susie Wiles says, Elon's trying to get an office in the Oval Office, and then they're...
Steve Bannon says he hates him. So what they're trying to do is tear Elon from Trump and say, he's a liability. And that's a lot about going after Elon. And then the Europeans are going after him because he endorsed the alternative for Germany party, et cetera.
You're left with just the realities, a very talented, wealthy, controversial guy. And they're very angry because they feel that they have a monopoly. And they're going to go after the same way very soon. They're going to go out. They did Peter Till, but they'll go after Larry Ellison, Mark Zuckerberg, Google people, Cook at Apple, if they don't tow the line.
Right. I don't know where they get their power. It's social and cultural that these titans, they finally said to themselves, you know, I don't mind paying taxes and I don't mind, you know,
ESG, DI, whatever, but when they go into the market and they tell us that these seven companies are going to have AI and nobody else or you can't do this and we're going to regulate you or they don't support us when the Europeans are taxing that crap out of us. Now that's too much.
And then when we have to hire these people out of these elite universities that they train, as Andreessen, I think Sami and I talked about that, that his CEO or his partner said to him, one of us, not his partner, but one of his chief advisors said, I've come to the conclusion that people we hire from these places, they want to destroy us, and they do. And so,
Will see but they're going to go after eat everybody should just assume that they're going to go after Elon and they're going to try to Tell everybody that he hates Trump and Trump hates him and the other tech lords are in the fight and it's a mess
I don't think it's quite true, though. Well, speaking of you, the richest man in the world. I don't know. He can always escape to Mars, maybe literally be able to, Victor, speaking of messes the fires in California and the
devastation there Donald Trump visited yesterday we are recording on the 25th Saturday the 25th but Trump went to California after he went to North Carolina and he had some a meeting with Gavin Newsom and a meeting and slash confrontation with Karen Bass the mayor of Los Angeles and we'll get your take Victor on the relevance of these things when we come back from these important messages.
New year, fresh start. Optimize your nutrition this year with factor. Factor has chef made gourmet meals that make eating well easy. Their dietitian approved and ready to heat and eat in two minutes so you can fuel right and feel great no matter what life throws at you. Factor arrives fresh and fully prepared, perfect for any active busy lifestyle. Hey, lose up to eight pounds in eight weeks with factor keto meals.
based on a randomized controlled clinical trial with factor keto results will vary depending on diet and exercise. With 40 options across eight dietary preferences on the menu each week, it's easy to pick meals tailored to your goals. Choose from preferences like calorie smart or protein plus or keto.
Factor can help you feel your best all day long with wholesome smoothies, breakfast, grab-and-go snacks, and more add-ons. Reach your goals this year with ingredients you can trust and convenience that can't be beat. Eat smart with Factor. Get started at factormeals.com slash Victor50 off
and use the code VICTOR 50 OFF VICTOR 50 OFF to get 50% off your first box plus free shipping. That's code VICTOR 50 OFF at factormeals.com slash VICTOR 50 OFF to get 50% off plus free shipping on your first box.
Are you ready to move easily and independently without pain or stiffness holding you back? Do you want to look in the mirror and see a plump, hydrated glow instead of more fine lines and wrinkles? Discover Native Path collagen made with only Type 1 and 3 collagen fibers, the two most important types that make up 90% of the collagen in your body.
Found in your cartilage, bones, skin, hair, nails, and gut? Type 1 and 3 provide maximum benefits without the need for unnecessary fillers. Native Path Collagen is a single ingredient formula with no fillers, additives, or artificial sweeteners. Plus, it's third-party tested for heavy metals, ensuring purity and safety.
Completely flavorless, native path collagen can be added to anything. Coffee, smoothies, oatmeal, you name it. Its peptide formula makes it more bioavailable, meaning it's absorbed more easily and mixes perfectly without clumping.
and you can get three or six packs at a fraction of the price of other brands. Visit getnativepath.com backslash victor and start your transformation today. That is G-E-T-N-A-T-I-V-E-P-A-T-H dot C-O-M backslash V-I-C-T-O-R. That's getnativepath.com backslash victor.
Start your transformation today. We are back with the Victor Davis Hanson show. I just want to state before we get into fires and Newsome Bass Trump that Victor has a website the blade of Perseus Victor Hanson calm Please check it out check it out daily because when you do if you do you'll find
links to everything Victor writes, American great necessities, syndicated columns, the special pieces he writes exclusively for the blade of Perseus, the special video he does exclusively for that the archives of these podcasts links to his books, etc. It is a cornucopia of Hanson. So to read the exclusive articles, you need to subscribe. It's $6.50 a month.
as they say, the price of a cup of coffee, and discounted for the full year at $65. Yes. So, yeah. So do check that out, victorhandsin.com, the blade of purchase. Victor, there's so much to ask you about. So Trump goes to California and the man who had a special session who created a special session of the California legislature
Just stick it to Trump, meet some at the airport, Gavin. Let's take any thoughts you have on that before we move to his meeting with Karen Bass. Any commentary on that, Victor? Well, Trump has all the cards because the Olympics is coming and Trump rightfully took credit for it when he was present and he engineered them. And they know that Los Angeles has got to do this, but he also knows
that there's a lot of agendas. And once this beautiful, this most beautiful, the crown jewel, really, of Los Angeles area, the Malibu Palisades area, when you combine the hillsides, the sun, the ocean, just, you know, I teach at Pepperdine sometimes, and just beautiful, just stunning.
And they know it's going to be rebuilt, but they have these engineering ideas. Why did these people get inherited a quarter acre lot and a Spanish style villa? This isn't fair.
Maybe now they don't have money to build it. They didn't have insurance. So the city should come in and re-engineered low-income housing affordable. And you know what I'm talking about, European, you know, outside in the suburbs. Every time you go to Milan or Naples or, you know,
Marseille, you see these big high rises, kind of like where you guys live outside on Long Island. And then you supposedly tie them in with light rail, and they have green spaces. And this is what they want to do. And Trump, of course, doesn't. So he comes in there, and he says, we're going to put some, you know, he turns a Rick went out, either you or, or
Someone you trust Rick and Rick is a LA resident is going to run this and there's going to be and then you have Daryl Isis explain there's going to be strings on this and then Trump.
kind of like a maestro. He's orchestrating all these people and they all have this different agendas. And then this leftist Brad Sherman goes in and says, I don't agree with you this. I don't agree with you. It's like me saying, Jack, I'd like you to be co-host. But I don't agree with you on abortion. I don't agree with you on foreign policy. I don't. And that's what he did with no power. And I'm thinking, are you insane?
Why are you doing this?" And then so finally Trump was very diplomatic and then he turned and he said, you know,
If you think about it, we have a storm coming in. The fire is out in Palestine, say, there are looters going in there. It's restricted. A lot of people off the record know that they have safe, so they have gold or they have precious jewels. And it might, they might, it's their property and they can't go in. So Trump just says to, he turns the Karen Bass in front of the world and says, why are they waiting? And she goes, well, they'll be in a week. Why wait a week?
What harm can they do? They can go in there and the fire was of such intensity. There's not a lot of, you know, half walls or upstairs. It's just powder. So they can go in there and hire their own people and get in and clean it up. Let all of these brilliant people who made all this money or their movement, they have their own idiosyncratic ways of cleaning this up. Just unleash them and they will rebuild. And, you know, and then she thought, Oh, I don't know.
Maybe a little okay sort of kind of and then there's Gavin Newsom He wasn't invited, but he met him at the airport. So out here in California everybody Gavin has been Blanking in the state and saying That's a lie about Trump All the reservoirs everywhere are full and what he's saying is
At this time of the year, we don't fool them. We don't fill them all the way because we anticipate a big melt. So I, when I let the water out all year long out of the Sacramento tributaries and to a lesser extent when the San Joaquin dumps into the Delta and they meet,
It doesn't matter in the winter because I need the reservoir, but when, you know, when the melts gone, I still do it in the summer, but let's not talk about that. But he's lying because we are in a drought right now and we're not probably not going to get an anticipated snowpack. And when you look at these reservoirs, there's most of them, not the far north ones, but the big ones, fulsome, 60%, San Luis, 70%, they're not full. They could be full right now if you left these tributaries
that the snow is melting that occurred in November or December. If you could let them not go out to the ocean, you could fill them. And then if you get a big snow melt, you could let them out, or you could just ram it down the aqueduct of a mandota canal. But he's lying about that. These reservoirs are not full mornin'. And you know why you know that?
The California aqueduct, the state project, the state water project, that's joined with them in DOTA, bypass, Hearnman, Hearn-Medona Canal. That's a central valley project, but they have kind of merged. And the point that Trump was making as a federal partner, I will insist that the
Water that comes out of the reservoir system and the river system, the Sacramento American climate, all of that will be pumped into the aqueduct. But right now, these people that are farming millions of two or three million acres along this aqueduct goes 100 miles, longer than 100 miles. Those farmers are getting 10% of their contracted water.
who's taking it? Well, over the years, they've given some to San Jose, they've given to Santa Barbara, they've given it to San Luis Obispo, they pump it over. But the point is they could get most of it if he wouldn't let it out to the ocean. If he'd fill the aqueduct, there would still be plenty for LA, but he won't do that. So what he does is he says, basically he says, well,
He lies in so many different ways. He says, well, the reservoirs are full because they're traditionally at 70% in a traditional year in preparation for the huge snow melt. There's not going to be a huge snow melt, probably. There's no reason to keep them that down. The water that would fill them up in case we have a drought and we are in a drought is not there because you're letting it out. The farmers are not going to get their water that's contracted and they want that.
Because out in the west side, the water table runs from 500 to 1500 feet. And if they don't have that water, they have to shut down. If they shut down, then you get the scrub and the tumbleweeds of my youth. I'd go out to the west side. My grandfather would always say, if you guys go out there, be careful of valley fever because it's just a dust bowl. That's that fungal.
Infection that's deadly if you don't have immunity to it didn't grow up out here, and then there's just tumbleweeds, coyotes, etc. The soil was rich, but there was no water. Well, they want that to go back. They don't want it farmed. When you fly over, it looks like a green garden.
All the way down to the Harris ranch all the way up to Las Banals and above all the way up to stock Tracy and up there so then my point is Then it goes to Los Angeles and then he says well, they're all full if you actually look at the the pyramid leg or cut there about 90% There's no reason why they're not full They're not full because he's not putting enough water in the system with that it made a difference
Probably not because you had a confederacy of dunces that were operating the water. What do I mean by that? There was enough water to fill the 117 million gallon reservoir at the top of palisades. It was completely empty because of a tear.
a five foot tear in the plastic cover. And that was to prevent evaporation and contamination. But you could have, she should have just said, you know what, fill that thing because we're in fire season right now and you work on the cover. And when the cover is done, put it over there, but just keep filling that thing up. She didn't do that. She didn't look at the fire hydrants that have been inoperative or stolen or didn't have the pressure.
Then she said something like kuyo, and said something like the head of water and power. Oh my God, we went through three million gallons of reserve water to augment the system. And why were they augmenting the system? Ms. Keone is because, accordingly, to Gavin Newsom's, all the reservoirs were full. So if they were full, you were fresherizing the system and palisades from different sources. Why did you need three million reserve gallons?
because you don't have enough water to keep the system pressurized at its fullest because you don't you have limitations on how much water you can take out of those reservoirs because you're not sure the governor is going to release enough water into the aqueduct and pump it over the grapevine into them or you won't have enough from the Owens Valley or Colorado sources. So if she just filled that thing there would have been they would have had a fighting chance to stop a lot of the damage.
The whole thing, and so Trump got into that mess, and you know, he had all of these people from, you know, he had, and there were many of them were people from the legislature that hated him. I mean, the speaker of the assembly called a special session and then the press conference to show what they were going to do started attacking Trump.
And when Gavin Newsom says, I have nothing. I need Trump's help. I'm trying to be a part. No, you're not. You just authorized 20 to 30, 40 million dollars when you have a multi-billion dollar deficit. And you allotted that money for the sole purpose of blocking Trump is executive orders. And then you turn around and say you're one of partner with him.
And everything he's wrong about, you've never diverted water from the California water project. That was what you ran on. That's what you did. You took money from the California bond to build three mega reservoirs and you blew up four small ones. You blew them up and you use money from the bond to build reservoirs to destroy them.
I know you're going to say, well, vector, that was only 2% of the total water in the Commonwealth. Yeah, yeah. But it was iconic that you take money that voters wanted to build reservoirs for insurance that would have given you five to six million, million acre feet, million. And you, you took that money to blow up four historic dams on the climate group. So I don't know how he survived that mess. He'd been all he'd been on a 19 hour day.
But when he turned to Karen Bass and says, why not a week? Weeks a long time. He was soft-spoken. And Melania is with him all the time now, Jack. She's a partner again. Boy, she just sits there smiling at him and sort of like saying, go on, Don.
It's just like some weird way of force multiplier. Yes, she is. She could see so superbly dressed and so beautiful. And she just sits there. And then I just saw her face. I was looking at the face of all the Trump people when you had that boo day or whatever her name is at the National Cathedral when she was going on that hooray against the Trump family.
And there's all these lip readers who say that JD turned, everybody turned around and said, can you believe that? And Tiffany was the angriest, Tiffany Trump. What a blank show that was. She left her six, as Sammy and I, she left her six bedroom, five bathroom home, worth two million in one of the tiniest neighborhoods of Washington to talk about that Donald Trump is not sensitive to poor people.
He's sensitive to poor people but they're not your poor people who are legally here. They're people who are black in the inner city and they're people who are Hispanic in the Rio Grande Valley or the San Joaquin Valley that are impacted and don't live in two million dollar states like you do and protected from the consequences of your own cheap ideology. Anyone who sees that and sees if they take the time to see what is happening with the Anglicans over in England will say there's no
I don't follow it all that closely, but I'm not surprised this religion will be extinct in a few years. I don't think they believe that Jesus took a whip and chased off the money lenders. I think she says to the people that Jesus said to the money lenders and the Pharisee type people.
I think we need to network on this. You get your people. I'll get mine. We'll have a discussion and we'll brainstorm and we'll have concessions in the spirit of my sift sermon of the Mount. And then you get something and I get something, but we just tone it down. We don't resort to whips and things.
I wonder how they would rewrite the Sermon on the Mount. Hey, Victor, before we move on, because there's some other California things, I just want to take a moment for our sponsor, Quince. Quince has all the must haves like Mongolian cashmere crewnecks sweaters from
only $50. Iconic, 100% leather jackets and versatile, loan it, active wear, the best part. All Quince items are priced 50 to 80% less than similar brands. By partnering directly with top factories, Quince cuts out the cost of the middleman and passes the savings on to you, us. I'm a Quince.
customer so i guess i'm part of the us quince only works with factories that use safe ethical and responsible manufacturing practices along with premium fabrics and finishes i love that indulge in affordable luxury go to quince.com slash victor for free shipping on your order and 365
day returns. That's quince. I'm going to spell it. This is my Bronx accent. Q-U-I-N-C-E dot com slash victor to get free shipping and 365 day returns. Quince dot com slash victor. We thank the good people at quince for sponsoring the victor. Davis Hanson show. I made something, said something about accents. By the way, Victor, I want, I want to get your thoughts on Trump's
quid pro quo for aid to california but uh i noticed that you watch old movies and that people don't say los angeles they say los angeles uh it's it's it was seemed to be like that was a traditional way to to uh to uh pronounce the the city's name in um anyway i just bring bring that up uh because i thought i heard you say it's similarly uh recent okay
When I mispronounce words, people sometimes think that I've got an agenda that are influenced by my vast knowledge of foreign languages. And it's not true. It's usually just
No, it's part of your Norm Crosby stand-up routine, I think. All right, Victor. Donald Trump said the price for helping California is for the state to adopt voter ID laws, which, by the way, is a very popular position with the population, not necessarily
The Assembly, the legislature of California, you think that's it? They'll never do it. They will never do it because they don't want to disenfranchise millions of people who are here illegally and are voting. And they've been a long residence. They just don't want to do it. They'll never do it. They will never do that.
They'll only do it if things get very worse and there is a charismatic Republican leader and he can galvanize all of the anger about the $15, $50 billion boondoggle Fresno. I mean Merced to Bakersfield High Speed Rail or what they're doing with water or these fires are now endemic and they're not going to keep going.
That's a sad thing about it. There's still millions of acres of on-cleared brush, shopper rail around Los Angeles. We haven't had a big storm. They may have a little rain today, we don't know. But the winds will kick up still. It's not quite... The Santa Amas are not quite over. They're still... Why? Especially if it's hot during the day.
It's very cold. When you get these cold nights and you get these warm days, you get in Los Angeles, these winds go up in the canyons. It's just terrible. And they haven't changed.
And what does somebody mean by that? I would say, do you still have 100 vehicles that are not running because of air pollution updates? I bet you do. Is anybody filled up that reservoir and Pacific policy just to show people are all the hydrants working now?
I don't think so. Do you have a new fire chief and a new assistant fire chief? I don't think so. Is the deputy mayor fired because he allegedly phoned in a bomb threat? I don't think so. So if the conditions haven't changed and the people who caused the problem haven't changed and there's not a radical or they're right now thousands of fire people
combing the hills around Los Angeles to cut down the brush and to strangle, kill, murder, bomb, cut down the poor little milk veg plant that they love so much so that they won't clear the hills. I don't think so. It's a one-party state. I'm not saying that one-party states can't work. Texas works. But this party,
It doesn't work. You've got a bunch of Socialists that are very wealthy and materialistic and they feel that they have enough money and zip codes and influence When you go through if you just take I take if you want to know what's wrong with California Just go start in La Jolla among the most beautiful places in the world San Diego, La Jolla drive up
and go up to Newport, one of the most beautiful places in the world. Keep going along the coast to Ventura, Oxnard, and then go to Montecito, Santa Borna, most beautiful places in the world. And then just take a little hike up in those beautiful places like San Luis Obispo. Then keep going.
up to Monterey and Santa Cruz, and then on the way to the Bay Area, and you'll see more money there than anywhere in the world. Some of the most beautiful homes, and 90% of those people vote hard left. They really do. And then you jog over to the Inland Empire, San Bernardino, or you go up from, say, Bakersfield, go up the 99.
You know, pull over into a counter, I don't know, in Delano, and then come out by and go into West Salma where I live, and then, you know, you can make a little detour into Madeira, and you go up to the 99 all the way to some, and you'll see some of the poorest people in the world living. And these communities are heavily reliant on entitlements, and those communities make so much money, and they have such beautiful homes that they're willing to pay it.
and the people in between that don't have that kind of capital and can't afford the tax and don't take government services to the same degree, they've left, they've left. And that's California. And I don't know how you change it except the people along the coast, the 30 million of the 40 million residents have to make a change of mindset. And I just don't see it.
I say that because I've been 22 years at the Hoover institution driving back and forth every week, and I see these kids generation after generation, some of the wealthiest people in the world, especially from California, and they're hard left when they're there. My favorite was parking on campus during George Floyd.
that I think it was May of 2020. And the thing was shut down, but there was a young kid in flip flops. And he pulled him with a BMW convertible in May, June, was during the summer. And he had flip flops and he had a BLM sticker on his $120,000 BMW convertible. I thought, there it is. That's it. Yep.
Well, I'd like to mention one of the thing, Victor, get your thoughts on it and then we're going to head to the
the last chapter of the show, and we're going to talk about pardons, but pardons is part of this. It has to do with Karen Bass. We brought this up before that in her previous life, as a hardcore communist, maybe she's a softcore communist now, but she went to Cuba regularly. She was an organizer for this Vinceramos Brigade. That was big in California. Well, we shall conquer, yeah.
They taught a variety of future looming terrorists and those terrorists with names like Tim Blanc, Susan Rosenberg, Linda Sue Evans. These are the people who engaged in a number of terrorist activities in the US, including bombing the US Capitol in 1983. So here we have an actual attack.
on the Capitol, buy people, connect the dots to this Karen Bass, and then also thinking of pardons, all these people, well, not pardons, they had their long, because they were engaged in a variety of terrorist activities, bombing other federal facilities, armed robbery, they brinks truck in New York, but they were arrested, convicted, some of them 50-year jail terms.
Guess who, you know, ended their sentences was was Bill Clinton in one of his last Axis president. He let all these SOBs out of jail. So we have pardons, we have capital, true attacks on the capital of the United States, and somehow or other Karen Bass's fingerprints. That's a good point because I was looking at the pardons.
Joe Biden, if you count clemency reductions and pardons, has pardoned about 8,000. When you do the 2,000 of Barack Obama, you get 10,000. Of the last four presidency, George W. Bush only did 200.
Now Trump has got about 1600, but 1500 of them were just this one part. He did about 200 in his first two. So what I'm getting at is of the last four presidents, the two conservative presidents that had 12 years of governance, pardoned or offered clemency to 20% of what
the eight years the same period eight years of obama and four years of fighting. In other words they did almost five times as many pardons and clemency and
People are so upset about the JC. The thing about the J6 very quickly is all I would say to Liz Cheney, Adam Kissinger, Adam Schiff. And by the way, Jack, just as a little side light, you see on the internet all of these outraged expressions by Adam Schiff
Andrew Wiseman, the brains behind the Mueller investigation, the Machiavellian operator, and people like Chuck Schumer in 2021 when it came up that Donald Trump in his last two weeks could give a preemptive pardon for the people that week that had just been arrested and pardoned himself.
There was no idea. There was no ever clear evidence that he was going to do that. In fact, he tweeted that he wouldn't. But of course, like Trump, he said, I could if I wanted to, but I won't. But they went nuts. And those are being played now. And they say, anybody who accepts a preemptive pardon de facto is guilty because they would turn it down if they didn't. And now they're all, this is wonderful. You have to have preemptive pardons. And the thing about January 6 is one
They they stonewalled by they'll never tell us the true FBI role to cash but tell his FBI director They said we were not we don't know we can't tell and then they said 23 informants again Matthew Rosenberg said I was there they were everywhere He said liberal old surprise New York time. They they would not release all of the videos for three years I don't think we still see them there is missing encrypted files and evidence in the January 6th committee that they it
mysteriously disappeared shortly before the Republicans came into power after taking the house in 2022. Somebody destroyed evidence. If there's nothing to hide, then Liz Cheney should never, she should have just said, Cassie Hutchinson, you go testify any way you want. But I don't, there's no need of me to have a stealthy phone call and make sure I walk through your testimony when your lawyer is not present.
And you know, if I'm Nancy Pelosi, the evidence is out there. Kevin McCarthy, we've never, why would I turn down your nominations? You know, three or four more Republicans, we've never done that in the history of the house. Sure, it's your right. Just as my right. When I was in the minority, you didn't turn down my nominations.
And then she didn't do that. She said, basically, I just want Liz and I want Adam because they voted to impeach Trump. And they are going to be defunct and out of the house. So I know that they're not going to vote in the way you would like. And then of course,
In addition to all that, they didn't have to lie. If there was nothing wrong with the narrative, then just say that Brian Signic had a stroke. And then why fabricate that four people that were in law enforcement who later killed themselves for various reasons, they died. We're going to have a ceremony and they're going to run to R5 or kill. There was only one person kill.
And if you really, really believe the narrative, then there was no reason not to just get the evidence out that Officer Bird shot an unarmed woman, lethally shot her for the misdemeanor of going through a window, a little diminutive veteran. Ashley Babitt was not existential, that to anybody. She broke the law, but in the United States, when a law enforcement officer in any way is suggested that
kills, or did anything. I mean, Officer Chauvin didn't take a gun and shoot George Floyd, who was unarmed. He tried to restrain him because he was resisting arrest. He was on fentanyl. He just passed counterfeit currency. He was on drugs, fentanyl, and he had COVID, he had heart problems, etc.
But we had his picture in a nanosecond and his name and his address. So there was no reason to hide Bird or to tell us that he didn't he had a wonderful record when he had had a checkered record. He left a loaded firearm in a bathroom in the Capitol.
So I think he's trying to make his neighborhood also. Yes, he did. And then what else did he do? He tried to make sure that he got money from the victim's fund of January 6 law enforcement officers.
as if he was a victim. So the point I'm making is all of those narratives were suppressed. And if you really have nothing to hide, then you don't need a video to surface suddenly right now that Nancy Pelosi is in the cards. Oh my God, I should have had more Capitol Police.
Why did they do all that? And that's the problem. And then you don't get your fact checkers and say, well, you can't talk about May, June, July, August, September, October, 2020 when 14,000 people were arrested because they were more arrested. Yes, there was more arrested. And you know why? There was more arrested because you guys killed 35 people.
Not none. Thirty-five. And you blew up two billion dollars of damage. And you blew up a precinct, police precinct, federal property, and a courthouse. And then you went in and tried to torch the St. John's Episcopal Church. You tried to store him. And that's why I fought to you. And you know what? The percentage of people arrested who were let go with nothing
Far exceeds the number of the 1500 or so that were read in January 6, the conviction rate, the jailing rate is many times higher. Yet you go to those fact checkers and they just lie through their teeth. There's no connection with these two things. And you know, this person was given 10 years for arson during the 2020. No one quite had that. That is so frustrating. It really is.
Well, Victor, we have one or two more topics to bring up, and we'll get into one of your favorite people, Anthony Fauci, and we'll do all that when we come back from these important messages.
You resolved to get healthier this year? Great. How you gonna do it? Supplements? Okay. Some green fruit and vegetable drink? Fine. But ask yourself, do any of those promise better health? Nope.
What's the point of green drinks and health supplements? If you aren't 100% confident, they'll improve your health. The Field of Greens Better Health Promise makes it radically different. Listen to this. Enjoy your delicious Field of Greens drink each day and at your next checkup, your doctor will notice your improved health or your money back.
How in the world can field of greens promise better health? Because each fruit and vegetable was doctor selected for a specific health benefit. There's a heart health group, lungs and kidney groups, metabolism, even healthy weight.
One drink a day is all it takes. You'll look and feel healthier with more energy fast and your doctor will notice your improved health or your money back. Get your New Year's discount with code VICTOR at fieldofgreens.com. That's code VICTOR at fieldofgreens.com.
We are back with the Victor Davis Hanson Show. Again, we're recording on Saturday the 25th, and this particular episode is up on to check my notes. Tuesday the 28th. Victor, one last thing on pardons. If you don't mind, I want to bring it a little close here to where I live in Connecticut. I live in Milford, Connecticut, which is about 10 miles from Bridgeport. So this is one of the notorious
part and ease of Joe Biden. And let me just read this report from many of our local papers here about the Connecticut drug kingpin convicted in the deaths of an eight year old boy and his mother was granted clemency by Biden. It's pissing off. Excuse my French, even fellow Democrats, Adrian Peeler 48.
A bridge port served 25 years in state prison on conspiracy charges in the death of Karen Clark and a eight-year-old son, BJ Brown, in January 1999. The two had been slated to testify a month later against Peeler's brother, fellow drug gang leader Russell Peeler, who was on trial for killing Clark's boyfriend.
Little BJ was in the car. He saw what happened. He saw this drive by shooting. He was going to testify and Adrian made sure the little boy was murdered and mom was murdered and he was convicted and went away. I have to say this locally,
What's one of the impacts of this crime, irrespective of what Biden did, was, okay, wow, if I'm in a drug-ridden community, and if I see a crime happen, and if I'm going to testify, there's a good chance I may end up in a grave. This is really a despicable thing.
It is despicable. Part in him is just staggering. And to do it at the end. Everybody who is listening, ask yourself if Joe Biden had won the election, do you think he would have done this?
even say well he had nothing to lose victory wasn't going to go up for a like no he wouldn't have done it because he would have had zero public support going into a second term and that would have been a midterm campaign issue that would have ruined his down ticket support in the congress he only did it
in the last days or hours even of his administration because he knew it had no public support and he was an embittered old man and he was he hated don't Trump but more importantly he began to hate more his own party who deposed him and he had no circumspection he didn't say to himself you know
I was going nowhere in 2020. I had bouts of dementia. I had embarrassed myself on the debate stage, and then those guys saved me, Jim Clyburn and the Black Caucus and the Obama people, and they allowed me to be president when I was not fit, and they controlled the agenda.
they got rid of me so they created me and they got rid of me but i had a four years which i didn't deserve you can't think like that. And either can his wife so he's a mean spurt spirited person and all the dementia did was take away the veneer of control took away as blinders and we saw the old joe by buying from scranton who he really was. You go back and look at his career he was a mean.
Excuse that language, SOB. He always was. He had racist tendencies. He was a plagiarist. He was a pathological purvericator. No need to get into the lies that he defamed the person who was in the auto accident that killed his wife, who was not culpable at all. He did every despicable thing. I go back to Cara Reed, all of that stuff, and then
You know, every time I see Donald Trump hug somebody, I just say, if that was Joe Biden, that girl would be in big trouble right now because he would say something or blow on her. And no one says a word. So anyway, I would just like to talk about that very quickly as we in Jack about
Well, I have to read one thing, though, because we have sponsors here. I want to tell you about a great movie for all of our listeners. The new heart-pounding military thriller, Valiant One, has everything you need in a movie with tensions high between North and South Korea.
A U.S. military helicopter crashes deep in North Korean territory with a platoon leader dead and no rescue coming. Young Sergeant Edward Brockman must find a way to get the survivors back to safety. He must rise to the challenge to lead his team.
on a daring escape through treacherous and hostile territory with enemy soldiers hot in pursuit. Only courage can bring them home. Valiant One has all the grit and explosive action you'd expect, along with a story of survival and bravery under fire that keeps you on the edge of your seat. All you need
Is popcorn don't miss this new action thriller from Briar cliff entertainment and monarch media valiant one starring featuring chase stokes and lana condor and only in theaters on january 31st and we thank the good people from valiant one. Responding the victor davis had to be sure to see it it sounds very i'm going to go see it.
Yeah, before you go see it, Victor, and before you start taking a two by four to the head of Anthony Fauci, although he's so small, maybe all you need is a toothpick. I do want to say that, peeler, who we've talked about before, the pardon, like there has to be some parallel to Biden's madness and nastiness.
It seems like there had to be some kind of like an earmark thing like, oh, well, he's going to do this. How did Pilar get on a list and how did all these other SOBs get on? Well, you know, Biden didn't know from what Speaker Johnson said when he went to meet with him.
He said, why did you shut down these liquid natural gas projects for export in Louisiana? And that was critical because we promised, you promised the Europeans, you would supply them with a reliable, affordable source of energy. And Biden said, oh, I didn't do that. Who said I did that?
I don't really really do that. And so you get the impression from Johnson that this was a normal occurrence when these people do, they think, what would be a really spectacular left wing performance or act? So when I leave office and I go apply to Google, or I go to apply to the Soros Foundation, I can say I was the architect that shut down the LNG facilities for buy. That's how they think.
So they're thinking, we're going to go out in the left wing sphere. And what do we do? Well, let's get, wait, I'm a lawyer. I'm going to go to this law firm. Oh, I want to go to the state government post in California. I want to be ahead to, you know, Apple's interior DI program. So I'll just let's go through all these names. Now, which people have been oppressed or discriminated or fit our DEI categories and we don't really care what they did.
And we can take credit for it. So believe me, Jack, we don't know who did it, but it's that army of leftists that came into the Biden administration via the Obama's and via the recommendations and promotions of Elizabeth Warren, the squad and Bernie Sanders type.
those people are preparing these lists, and will never know their names, but they will not be shy in identifying themselves at the particular opportune moment when they think it helps their career, and it will help their career in these leftist institutions. If you think that
Retiring generals revolve into the major defense contractors and many of them do the left wing counterpart of that they revolve into silicon valley at least until recently where they get you know james a baker the.
FBI Lawyer who went from about a quarter million dollar salary at the FBI to seven million dollars a year as Jack Dorsey's Chief Counsel at Twitter where all the other 15 other retired FBI people were working.
We'll take a breath and now we're just finishing with your former fellow alumnus. Is that right? I don't understand. Donald Trump stopped federal monies used to protect three people. John Bolton, Mike Pompeo and Anthony Fauci. Now, I have read and people correct me that
Anthony Fauci's security detail was paid out of National Institute of Health funds and authorized by Joe Biden and it would Sunset or finished when Joe Biden went out of office So I think in that case Each simply did not read, you know, we knew this NIH program It wasn't that he went out in the middle of it that had a you know an unlimited tenure and said get rid of it But then the next question is
There are – you're talking about a person who had Secret Service. Supposedly the best security detail almost had his head blown off. So I think Trump is saying to them, if they want to kill you, it's not going to help you because it didn't help me and I had the biggest legion of security in the world.
Number two, how long does this last? He asked that. They said, Mr. President Trump, are you feeling any responsibility for any of their activities injured? No, how long does it last for life? And you know, we all comparing great things to small
I have an angry reader call and that I just kind of every month or two, we go through the emails and they are full of FU and I have kind of an angry reader scale and they're threatening. I had a guy write and say, I know where you live, I know your phone number, I know what you look like and I know you go to Washington. Next time you go to Washington, it's going to be your last trip.
And actually somebody, I printed that letter and somebody online said, I'm a prosecutor, a federal prosecutor, and I know from your email who that was, because I put his email on there. And then I had a guy drive into my farm and he, I went out and I said, could I help you? And he said, I got a, I got a bone to pick with you. I said, you know that this is a private residence. He said, I'm not leaving. I said, fine, but you're on my property.
And I looked over there and he had parked his car hidden in the orchard. Why would he do that? So I said, just go buy wouldn't want to be see you wouldn't want to be you. And then he just sat there in his car for four or five hours. So my point is I think anybody that has a modicum of public exposure encounters that.
encounters that. I was at the Reagan airport not too long ago. I think I told you, Jack, and I got off the plane and I noticed out of the corner of my eye there was this young man who fit perfectly the Antifa profile, skinny, white,
all black, stocking hoodie, and behind him was a large African-American guy. So this guy, when I was walking, I saw that he kept walking, and then he walked very fast and hit me in the back of the head, really kind of hard. And then he jumped down the escalator, almost like the movies where he's going, and the African-American guy had actually seen him
and was following him to help me a stranger. So then he went, he was very big though. He wasn't as light and he went down the regular way and then he came back and he said, you know, I listened to your podcast once in a while. I really like what you, and that guy was going to go after you. I saw you when you got off the plane. I was boarding and I got to get back. And I was not that far from the loading, you know, and I was still in security. So
We all encounter those things. John Bolton, and then Trump made a very good point. He said, these people made a lot of money. So Anthony Fauci, and correct me if I'm wrong, Jack, but he and his wife, I think, were the highest-paid couple in the federal government. I think they were each making somewhere between $400,000 and $450,000 a year, maybe $900.
Yes. So he's a very wealthy person and he can afford 150,000 if he thinks that he as a private citizen after getting two years of government support that he has offended people. And when I write stuff, I always think about it.
I always think when I say, when I get off this podcast, I say, did you, I always ask myself, were you unfair to anybody? Did you say a swear word that's going to offend children? Listen, did you unfairly cast a gate? Did you have to do you have to retract anything? I've written probably 4,000 columns in my life. I've only had one retraction. So I, and I'm not a celebrity like Anthony Fauci, but he has the resources to protect himself.
Now, we go to John Bolton. John Bolton is very wealthy. I know for a fact that he had a pact that earned $7 million a year. And I know a lot of people, I'm not going to mention their names, who have called me and said, I give this amount of money to John Bolton. What do you think I should do?
And I've always said, it's none of my business. If you want to donate to him, and they've said, would you donate if you had money? I said, no, and I wouldn't. I have nothing against John Bolton, but during the impeachment, John Bolton was writing a tell-all narrative. And he understood that if he was to oppose and say Donald Trump needed to be impeached, he would get a big backlash. On the other hand, if
He kind of winked a nod, and he did, and they had problems with classifying. Remember that back and forth about his memoirs? And then he made, it was a bestseller. I know what that type of book will make. I do. So he has a lot of funds.
If he thinks he's in danger, then just hire somebody for $150,000 a year. And his speaking fees, I'm pretty much because I've spoken at avenues that have hired him. He can pay that in four or five speaking engagements for the entire year.
And I would imagine that he will be safer than Donald Trump will be at the level of the Secret Service. The one I have a problem with is Mike Pompeo. Mike Pompeo, unlike Anthony Fauci and John Bolton, does not have those resources. He really doesn't. I know him. I've known him.
He was one of Trump's most loyal people. He had a falling out as I understand for three reasons, Jack.
I don't think these reasons constitute any defection on Mike Pompeo's part toward Donald Trump, but there was a time you remember right after January 6 when they were floating names of possible. Remember there was a flirtation? No announced candidacy, no campaigning, but there was a suggestion that Mike Pompeo was going to run against Donald Trump. Do you remember that?
Jack. Yes. Yeah. And he did throw his hat in the ring. What? Yes. And the people in the Trump family said that's why he lost weight. You remember all that? Yeah. So anyway, and then that was one. And the two, after the Marlago raid, he said, and I'm not, I'm doing this by memory, everybody. So please correct me. But I will try to be fair to both sides. He tried, he characterized the SWAT raid into Marlago.
in terms of, well, it's unusual, but there was some culpability if Donald Trump had better, what, communicated, it wouldn't have been necessary, something like that. And then a third time, he said something about the January 6 thing. Okay. So I think what happened was the Trump people felt
A, if we come back into power, we're not going to have anybody. It's not going to be directed anybody. We're not going to have anybody from the first administration, maybe Rick Renal or maybe Radcliffe, but pretty much we've got to have real strong MAGA people. And then there was some resentment about that. But the point is,
Iran has threatened to kill Bolton. I shouldn't say has at one point threatened to kill Trump and more threats against Trump, but also Pompeo and Bolton for the death of Solomonian. I will say that the way that Trump
what will protect Trump and protect Bolton and protect Pompeo if Trump continues what he's doing vis-a-vis Iran. And he has told them if anybody
If anybody is hurt by Iran, we're holding you directly responsible. Did that have an effect? Yes. The Iranian president was elected not too long ago, gave an interview recently and they asked him point blank, are you going to develop a bomb? Probably not. We don't want to. Are you going to keep sending terrorists? This was a lie, but he said probably we want peace. Have you in the past or in the future or in the present plan to kill
the American present or our habit. No, no, no, we're not going to do that. So the point is that Donald Trump is creating deterrence and making it clear that if the Iranians send out what as they purportedly did a team to kill Donald Trump, but they try to touch one American and that will be as valuable as security detail. That's my point. Yeah. So well, bottom line, I would have said to myself,
Bolton and Fauci who don't like me and have written a lot of terrible things about me may have both of them have independent funds to at least get a security person and the government can't afford to give
lifelong and for in the case of Pompeo I would have probably said I'm going to extend because he doesn't have those resources and he had a higher profile as secretary of state than did Bolton at national security and he had a longer tenure than John Bolton and he was more intimately involved with the decision to kill Soleimani
and the maximum then was Bolton's brief tenure. Therefore, he may have greater exposure and he has less personal resources and I would have extended it for a year just to see what happens. The news is so biased and if you google that issue, almost the first 20 Google searches.
will show up. Donald Trump yanks security. When asked, he said, I don't feel I'm responsible. That was all it was, no background, nothing. And I wish when he saw the Google people at the inauguration festivities, he should have walked over to them and said, you know what, you can really help.
This country just don't use your algorithms to wire and warp the results of Google searches because every single Google search is wired to show the first 20 sites are left wing propaganda bias and you just just
Google Cash Patel, who's coming up, I think, on Wednesday or Thursday for confirmation. Just Google it and see what comes up. Anybody with a right mind who takes the shift counter memo or the Nunes original memo that Cash was very instrumental in writing and looks at the events since the issuance of those competing narratives knows that Adam Schiff was lying to his teeth.
and the Nunez memo has stood the test of time. And yet if you go in and look at Google searches, it will say Cash Patel had a hand in the erroneous or bias or misleading Nunez memo. So bottom line.
Who's more like kind of animated with this idea that Anthony Fauci or John Bolton is entitled to lifetime security when the president is doing all he can on like Joe Biden. Maybe put it this way to end. John Bolton was in more danger with the security day.
with Joe Biden as president, then he is with Donald Trump without it. Because Joe Biden gave no indication there would be any consequences because he was begging Iran to get back on the Iran deal and appeasing them. Donald Trump has a different argument and they know that anybody tried to make an attempt on anybody's life.
he would probably go to an existential level and be applying to that. I know that because comparing, I'll just finish with this, Jack. You remember when we expelled during the early,
Trump administration some we had excuse me during the Obama administration we had expelled some Russian oligarchs but they had they were in the Roman the Russian Embassy and Putin we applied by
And we put them under sanctions and said they couldn't go in and Putin replied by saying the following American former diplomats couldn't go back into the Soviet Union. And we were going to consider them persona non grata. Okay. So a person, I won't mention the person. He was from the opposite political persuasion of mine. And this speaks well of Mike Pompeo.
I'm relating a personal story, but I'll try to be as non-descriptive so there's no individual. Anyway, someone approached me from the Hoover Institution and said, there is this person who had a high diplomatic post.
And Vladimir Putin has targeted him that he can't go back into Russia and we feel that he might be in danger because of that. And I said, I don't think he is. It's just a tit for tat. No, no. And I said, why are you asking me? I'm just nobody. Well, you may or may not have contacts that we don't have. I said, I don't. And they said, would you please try to contact the Secretary of State? So I made some phone calls.
And I talked to Mike Pompeo just for a second. You know, his first reply was, do not worry about it. We are way ahead of you people.
The Russian government will not touch one hair on any of these people. We do not care what the political persuasion is. We do not care what administration they work for. Our diplomats will be sacrosanct, and we have communicated that to the Russians. So he is the safe to go whatever he wants. It's a Russian decision whether to let him in or not. But if they allow him to go in the country and he wants to take the risk to go meet with Putin dissidents, we will still assume.
still assume that he is safe. And if they touch him, they're going to be in big trouble. That was Pompeo's attitude. So that's why I think he deserves some special consideration. I really do. Because he was there for so long as Secretary of State. And he made the primary decision that the Iranians really got angry about. So many. And he may be a target. And he was a very honest guy. And he went in there with no money.
And he didn't leave. He's not making a lot of money to my knowledge. And I've always found into a very principled person. And I understand why they had a falling out with the Trump administration, but I don't see culpability on either side. I just think it was a disagreement. And I think he has a role to play in future conservative administration. Yeah.
Well, that's a terrific note on which to end this episode, except that we have some of that end of episode business to attend to, which is one is to say that I write a weekly free weekly email newsletter for the Center for Civil Society. It's called Civil Thoughts, and I want to encourage you to sign up
Get it every Friday comes in your inbox. 14 recommended readings of excellent articles I've come across the previous week. Go to SybilThoughts.com and sign up. Want to thank the people who leave comments on Victor's website and on Apple.
And we read them and folks also take the time to rate the show on Apple zero to five stars just getting 4.9 plus average from over 7,000 people who have done that. Thank you if you have. Here's a comment that was filed the other day.
It's titled current events through the lens of history. I listened to this podcast regularly and appreciate VDH's succinct articulate and down-to-earth analysis so much. He affords an opportunity to look at current events through the lens of history, clear-sided, intelligent,
And very entertaining. And this is from Honest Grace. And we thank you, Honest Grace. And we thank everybody else who leaves these comments. Have you been terrific? Well, thank you. And we will be back soon with another episode of the Victor Davis Handsome Show. Thank you, everybody, for listening. We wouldn't be able to continue without your listening and adherence and loyalty. I really appreciate it. So does Jack. I do. Yes.
As someone who studied military history for decades, I want to tell you about a critical intelligence briefing, our friends at American alternative assets have just released its called homeland 2025. And if you're concerned about America's security, you need to see this.
Former CIA officers have revealed disturbing evidence about threats to American cities. But more importantly, this briefing explains how to protect your family's financial security during times of crisis. This is not about fear. It's about being prepared with facts and historical perspective. Right now, American alternative assets is offering our listeners this crucial briefing, plus
up to $10,000 in free silver and a free American made safe. These are patriots we trust to help protect what matters most. Visit victorlovesgold.com and tell them Victor sent you learn what financial institutions already know about securing your family's future.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
Going to Giza and Cutting Through DC Waste

The Victor Davis Hanson Show
Join the Saturday episode with Victor Davis Hanson and cohost Sami Winc as they discuss the ancient pyramids in Giza and recent news: Bankman-Fried’s parents want a pardon, Trump re-opens Guantanamo, a retrospective on executive orders and pardons, the hysterical style of interrogation, and David Mamet’s art.See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
February 01, 2025
Plane Crash, Executive Orders, and Kash

The Victor Davis Hanson Show
Victor Davis Hanson and Sami Winc discuss Trump's presidency, executive orders, D.C. plane-helicopter collision, DEI policies, meritocracy, immigration challenges, fentanyl crisis, Kash Patel's confirmation hearing, and the left's response to political apostates.
January 31, 2025
Don't Look Back: America First and the Dangerous Alternative

The Victor Davis Hanson Show
Discussion between Victor Davis Hanson and Jack Fowler on DJT's America First Manifesto, contrast with Obama administration, Mexico's perspective on Trump, Greenland's status, challenges of facing China's Belt and Trade Initiative, the comeback of meritocracy, de-DEIing universities, irony of Biden's mental fitness comments, and Alger Hiss conviction anniversary.
January 30, 2025
Trump, Davos, and the New World Order

The Victor Davis Hanson Show
Experts Victor Davis Hanson and Sami Winc discuss Trump's address at Davos, his remarks' implications, controversial statements by Bishop Budde, ongoing immigration debates, and they explore the historical significance of the Lighthouse at Alexandria.
January 25, 2025

Ask this episodeAI Anything

Hi! You're chatting with The Victor Davis Hanson Show AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history