Impactful Comedy: John Oliver's Last Week Tonight combines comedy with serious topics, encouraging real change and fostering an informed audience. Instead of reacting to rapid news cycles, he focuses on in-depth, meaningful discussions, which has blurred the lines between entertainment and journalism.
John Oliver's show, Last Week Tonight, has gained popularity for its unique blend of humor and important social commentary. Instead of focusing on immediate news debates, Oliver prefers to take a deep dive into single topics, helping to create awareness and encourage real change, known as the John Oliver Effect. His show has blurred the lines between entertainment and journalism, making it both informative and engaging. Over the past ten years, as the political climate has changed, so has the show's approach, emphasizing quality over the typical fast-paced news cycle. This allows for thoughtful discussions on significant issues that matter, resonating with a dedicated audience amidst a landscape of low-quality media.
Evolving Storytelling: Creators of the show learned to take time in story development, moving from one-week to six-week timelines. This allows for deeper exploration of complex issues with rigorous fact-checking, ensuring both accuracy and informed opinions are presented to viewers.
To improve their show, the creators discovered that rushing through complex topics was ineffective. Initially, they wrote stories in one week, but they learned that a six-week writing process, tackling multiple stories at once, allows for deeper exploration of important issues. They emphasize rigorous fact-checking to ensure accuracy since this provides a solid foundation for the opinions they present later. This structured approach helps address multi-faceted subjects like criminal justice more thoroughly, avoiding oversimplification. They recognize the importance of presenting facts clearly before offering their viewpoints, ensuring viewers receive both comprehensive information and thoughtful conclusions. This commitment to depth and accuracy contributes to the show's consistency and credibility over the years.
Comedy Creation: Comedy from serious topics requires a structured process involving research, outlines, and humor balance, allowing writers to create engaging and entertaining content.
Creating comedy from serious topics involves a careful and thoughtful process. Writers pitch ideas that are then researched for relevance and potential. Once a story is selected, it proceeds through stages, including research and outlining, before being developed into a script. The team works to balance heavy subjects with humor, often incorporating absurd elements or funny anecdotes to make the material more approachable. This approach ensures that writers have solid material to work with, allowing them to infuse humor effectively. The goal is not just to tackle difficult subjects but to make them entertaining through clever writing and pacing, leading to a satisfying comedic experience for both the creators and the audience.
Storytelling Balance: Producers blend humor and truth in storytelling, acknowledging harsh realities while promoting activist progress. Their focus on accuracy reflects a commitment to responsible reporting, despite not being trained journalists.
Creating compelling stories on serious topics requires a balance between humor and truth. Producers must seek red star clips that evoke laughter while handling blue star clips that discuss sad realities with care. While researching these stories can reveal harsh truths that provoke strong emotions, it's essential to avoid falling into nihilism. Instead, recognizing the incremental progress made by activists can provide a sense of hope. Although the team does not consider themselves journalists, they emphasize the importance of fact-checking and rely on credible sources to ensure accurate reporting. This collaborative approach combines humor with integrity, illustrating the value of responsible storytelling in highlighting systemic issues.
Comedy Foundations: Comedy relies on truth for humor, and the creator aims to craft interesting jokes. There's frustration over delayed YouTube episodes because it affects the viewing experience, emphasizing the need for complete storytelling and reaching a broader audience beyond just HBO subscribers.
Creating comedy is about building solid foundations, as truthfulness is essential for humor. While some comedians aim to entertain, others want to spark meaningful conversations. The writer emphasizes that their goal is to craft funny, surprising jokes rather than improve the world directly. They express frustration over a delay in distributing their show to YouTube, as they prefer viewers to experience the complete show rather than watching segments separately. This matters because the blend of serious and light-hearted content gives depth to their stories, allowing for better engagement and a broader audience, beyond just HBO subscribers. They value both the integrity of their jokes and the overall viewing experience, acknowledging how distribution methods influence audience reach and the advertisement of their work.
Creative Passion: The speaker expresses love for creating their show, enthusiasm for storytelling, and acknowledges future uncertainties, while humorously sharing insights about their team dynamics and the joy of tackling important topics.
The conversation reveals a deep passion for creating quality television that resonates with audiences. The speaker expresses gratitude for the support and resources provided by their employer, emphasizing the joy of storytelling. Although they acknowledge future uncertainties in the industry and personal burnout, their enthusiasm for the show remains strong. They reflect on the importance of enjoying the creative process and the fun of tackling important topics, proving that love for the craft can drive continued success. The mention of a stand-in host named 'Hot John' adds a humorous note, showcasing the camaraderie within the team. Overall, the discussion highlights the joy and challenges of maintaining creativity in an evolving television landscape while remaining committed to producing engaging content.
Humor in Journalism: John Oliver intertwines humor and serious journalism, believing comedy helps address difficult topics while maintaining accuracy. He sees his show as a creative platform for important storytelling, demonstrating how comedy can effectively engage audiences with serious issues.
In conversations about comedy and journalism, John Oliver emphasizes the importance of both humor and accuracy. He believes that comedy helps him cope with tough situations and connects with audiences. While his show covers serious topics, he knows it's not traditional journalism. Instead, Oliver sees it as an opportunity to share important stories creatively, with a focus on ensuring accurate representations of those involved. The challenge of topics like the West Bank excites him, as they allow for genuine storytelling while still incorporating humor to engage viewers. Understanding these dynamics between humor and news helps bridge the gap between different types of media, showing how they can coexist and convey important messages.
Humor in Pain: Using comedy to address serious issues helps connect with others and offers emotional relief, making tough topics more approachable while fostering understanding and shared experiences.
Comedy can be a powerful way to cope with complex and painful issues. The conversation highlights how humor can help us address dark moments in life, like serious social problems or personal tragedies. For some, making jokes is a way to process emotions and connect with others experiencing similar hardships, making tough subjects a bit more bearable. Comedians, like Jimmy Kimmel, manage to share their vulnerabilities through humor, allowing audiences to laugh and reflect at the same time. This blend of honesty and comedy can provide insight into shared human experiences while helping to relieve tension surrounding challenging topics. Humor isn’t just amusing; it can be a vehicle for deeper understanding and emotional connection, showing how absurdities of life can be tackled. In the end, engaging with difficult emotions through comedy can offer a sense of relief and community, making those moments feel a little less isolating for everyone involved.
Young Lives Empowered: Free movement across borders can transform young lives significantly, opening up opportunities that positively shape their futures, even amidst political challenges.
Having opportunities to move freely, like obtaining a British passport that granted access to the EU, can significantly impact young people's lives. This access allows them to explore new career paths and experiences, as shown by one sister who became a pastry chef in France. While the fear of losing such opportunities can feel disheartening, it's essential to hold onto hope for a better future and work through challenges. Families often talk about these realities over dinners, balancing the desire to discuss tough issues with the need for lighter moments. Despite frustrations with political processes, fostering meaningful conversations about societal issues and encouraging engagement remains crucial in guiding the next generation. Overall, it emphasizes the importance of both the joy of exploration and the responsibility of discussing life’s complexities with loved ones.
'The Interview': John Oliver Is Still Working Through the Rage
The Daily
2286 Episodes
Recent Episodes from The Daily
25 Days to Go
In the campaign for president, this was the week when back-to-back natural disasters became an inescapable part of the race, when Vice-President Kamala Harris chose to meet the press and when Donald J. Trump faced new accusations of cozying up to Russia’s president.
The Times journalists Michael Barbaro, Astead W. Herndon, Maggie Haberman and Nate Cohn try to make sense of it all.
Guest:
- Astead W. Herndon, a national politics reporter and the host of the politics podcast “The Run-Up.”
- Maggie Haberman, a senior political correspondent for The New York Times.
- Nate Cohn, the chief political analyst for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- A national Times/Siena poll found Ms. Harris with a slim lead over Mr. Trump.
- Republicans have spent tens of millions of dollars on anti-trans ads, part of an attempt to win over suburban female voters.
- The journalist Bob Woodward cited an unnamed aide as saying that Mr. Trump had spoken to President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia as many as seven times since leaving office.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
The Parents Aren’t All Right
For years, research on hyper-attentive parenting has focused on all the ways that it can hurt children.
Now, the U.S. government is reframing that conversation and asking if our new era of parenting is actually bad for the parents themselves.
Claire Cain Miller, who covers families and education for The New York Times, explains why raising children is a risk to your health.
Guest: Claire Cain Miller, a reporter who writes for The Upshot at The New York Times.
Background reading:
- The surgeon general warned about parents’ stress, a sign that intensive parenting may have become too intense for parents.
- Read the surgeon general’s essay about parent stress.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
How NAFTA Broke American Politics
On the campaign trail, Donald Trump and Kamala Harris are constantly talking about trade, tariffs and domestic manufacturing.
In many ways, these talking points stem from a single trade deal that transformed the U.S. economy and remade both parties’ relationship with the working class.
Dan Kaufman, a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine, explains how the North American Free Trade Agreement broke American politics.
Guest: Dan Kaufman, the author of “The Fall of Wisconsin,” and a contributing writer for The New York Times Magazine.
Background reading:
- How NAFTA broke American politics.
- Both Democrats and Republicans are expressing support for tariffs to protect American industry, reversing decades of trade thinking in Washington.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
The Year Since Oct. 7
Warning: this episode contains descriptions of war and trauma.
One year ago, Israel suffered the worst terrorist attack in its history. The conflict that followed has become bigger and deadlier by the day, killing tens of thousands of people and expanding from Gaza to Yemen, Lebanon and now Iran.
Today, we return to two men in Israel and Gaza, to hear how their lives have changed.
Guests: Golan Abitbul, a resident of Kibbutz Be’eri, in southern Israel; and Hussein Owda, who was among more than a million people sheltering in Rafah.
Background reading:
- How Oct. 7 sparked a year of conflict.
- Listen to the first interview with Golan.
- Listen to the first interview with Hussein.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
The Sunday Read: ‘The Blind Side’ Made Him Famous. But He Has a Different Story to Tell.
It was an overcast Monday afternoon in late April, and Michael Oher, the former football player whose high school years were dramatized in the movie “The Blind Side,” was driving Michael Sokolove on a tour through a forlorn-looking stretch of Memphis and past some of the landmarks of his childhood.
In the movie, Oher moves into the home of the wealthy white couple Leigh Anne and Sean Tuohy. They take him shopping for clothes, help him obtain a driver’s license, buy him a pickup truck and arrange for tutoring that helps improve his grades and makes him eligible to play college football. In real life, Oher went on to play eight seasons as a starting offensive tackle in the N.F.L. and won a Super Bowl with the Baltimore Ravens.
Now, Oher is suing the Tuohys, claiming that they have exploited him by using his name, image and likeness to promote speaking engagements that have earned them roughly $8 million over the last two decades — and by repeatedly saying that they adopted him when they never did.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
'The Interview': Al Pacino Is Still Going Big
Four Weeks to Go
With Election Day fast approaching, polls show the race between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald J. Trump to be the closest in a generation.
The Times journalists Michael Barbaro, Shane Goldmacher, Maggie Haberman and Nate Cohn break down the state of the race and discuss the last-minute strategies that might tip the scales.
Guest:
- Shane Goldmacher, a national political correspondent for The New York Times.
- Maggie Haberman, a senior political correspondent for The New York Times.
- Nate Cohn, the chief political analyst for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- The state of the race: a calm week and perhaps the clearest picture yet.
- Scenes of workers on strike, hurricane devastation in the Southeast and missiles over Israel pose tests for Ms. Harris.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
Iran Retaliates
Israel’s series of military successes against its longtime adversary Hezbollah had raised the question of whether the militant group’s backer, Iran, would retaliate. On Tuesday, that question was answered, when Iran fired a barrage of missiles at Israel.
Patrick Kingsley, the Jerusalem bureau chief for The Times, and Farnaz Fassihi, The Times’s United Nations bureau chief, discuss how they see events developing from here.
Guest:
- Patrick Kingsley, the Jerusalem bureau chief for The New York Times.
- Farnaz Fassihi, the United Nations bureau chief for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Fiery balls of light could be seen falling from the sky over Jerusalem and loud explosions could be heard in Tel Aviv and other areas as Iran launched 180 ballistic missiles at Israel.
- After the missile attack, Israel may be more prepared to risk war with Iran.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
The Walz-Vance Debate: Civility and Then a Clash
Just three weeks after Kamala Harris and Donald J. Trump engaged in a fiery and often hostile presidential debate, their running mates, Tim Walz and JD Vance, met for their own face-off — and struck a very different chord.
Reid J. Epstein, a politics reporter for The Times, explains why this debate was so different and what it could mean for the race.
Guest: Reid J. Epstein, a politics reporter for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Read coverage of the debate.
- Analysis: Mr. Vance strained to sell a softer image of Mr. Trump.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.
Hurricane Helene’s 600 Miles of Destruction
Warning: This episode contains strong language and descriptions of death.
Over the past few days, Hurricane Helene has left a trail of devastation, killing more than 100 people, driving thousands from their homes and leaving millions without power.
Judson Jones, a meteorologist and weather reporter for The Times, and Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, a Times national reporter, discuss the toll left by the deadly storm.
Guest:
- Judson Jones, a meteorologist and reporter for The New York Times.
- Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs, a national reporter for The New York Times.
Background reading:
- Hurricane Helene spawned flash floods and landslides as it barreled north after devastating parts of Florida’s Gulf Coast.
- In less than a day, Helene transformed from a Category 1 hurricane to a Category 4. Read about how that happened so quickly.
For more information on today’s episode, visit
. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Soon, you’ll need a subscription to keep full access to this show, and to other New York Times podcasts, on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Don’t miss out on exploring all of our shows, featuring everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts.