The hijacking of America: Subversion of our language and our laws

In this episode of Unleashed, Bruce Robertson emphasizes the difference between a democracy and a republic, arguing that America is a republic. He critiques how the media and politicians use the term democracy to push certain narratives that could undermine individual liberties. Robertson explains that calling America a democracy leads to mob rule and tyranny, as it obscures the foundational principles laid down by the Founding Fathers. He warns that frequent references to democracy can mislead people into thinking freedom comes from majority rule, which can harm individual rights. He also connects these ideas to historical philosophies, such as those of Plato and Hayek, urging listeners to be cautious about the language used in political discourse. He ends by asserting that recognizing America as a republic is crucial for preserving its core values against subversion.

Marx's Communist Manifesto outlines ten goals that challenge private property and individual freedoms, which some argue have been partly realized in the U.S. Examples include the government's eminent domain powers undermining property rights, progressive income taxes that tax wealth multiple times, and inheritance taxes limiting family legacy. Concerns also arise from the potential government control in finance through institutions like the Federal Reserve. These elements draw parallels to socialist ideas, raising debates around the balance between regulation and personal freedom. Critics warn that such policies could lead to reduced individual autonomy and greater state control over economics and personal assets, reflecting a divergence from foundational American principles.

Many believe the Federal Reserve is a government institution, but it operates more like a private bank, making secretive decisions that significantly influence the economy. There are concerns about its role in pushing America towards socialism, especially through the regulation of industries and the promotion of government control over agriculture. Some argue that policies since the creation of the Federal Reserve have led to inflation and economic changes that require families to rely on dual incomes, hindering traditional family structures. Various government agencies and regulations appear to centralize control over transportation and communication, raising fears of creeping socialism. This raises the question: Are we moving towards a system where personal freedoms and free market principles are increasingly compromised?

In America, the rise of corporate farming has pushed small family farms out of business, leading to a loss of independent livelihoods and jobs. This shift has been fueled by government policies favoring large corporations, which have turned agriculture into a massive production machine. As small businesses and farms close, many are forced to take multiple jobs or rely on government support, diminishing their independence. Public education, often serving corporate interests, trains future generations to fit into a debt-ridden economy. Over time, citizens have accepted more rules and regulations that restrict their freedom and property rights. While debates about freedom continue, it's crucial to recognize how far the principles of individual rights have been pushed aside. There is still hope to reinstate freedoms by enacting reforms that challenge the current status quo, but it requires collective awareness and action against the growing influence of government in personal and economic lives.

The speaker expresses a strong belief in individual freedom and the principles of a constitutional republic. They argue against big government and socialism, highlighting the historical failures of these systems. Emphasizing the need to revive foundational American values, they call for activism across various sectors, including education and media, to counteract what they see as destructive ideologies. The discussion also touches on concerns about open borders and the role of NGOs funded by taxpayer money in facilitating illegal immigration. The speaker advocates for awareness and action to protect American freedoms and historical values, suggesting a long-term optimistic outlook for change as society becomes more aware of these issues.

Many people believe that colleges and educational institutions have been influencing students towards leftist ideologies. This belief stems from the idea that professors tend to have a leftist bias, shaping young minds to question traditional values. Critics argue that this indoctrination starts early, with exposure to left-leaning media and educators. They posit that radicals from past generations infiltrated education as a peaceful means to incite change, resulting in students coming home with new beliefs that can conflict with their parents' values. Campaigns and movements seen on college campuses are believed to be driven by this educational influence. Therefore, there is a growing concern that the youth are being groomed to support leftist agendas, necessitating a counter-effort to 'deprogram' them from these ideologies that are perceived as harmful to traditional values and society at large.

There are claims regarding Barack Obama's background, suggesting he has communist ties through his parents and connections with influential figures like Khalid Al Mansour, who allegedly helped him get into Harvard. Concerns are also raised about George Soros's recent media acquisitions, which some view as politically motivated interference. The speaker discusses how accusations of fascism against Donald Trump and his supporters are seen as a misrepresentation, emphasizing that historical socialism movements, including Nazism, align with socialist ideologies. Overall, the conversation touches on political alliances, ideological roots, and the impact of media ownership on public discourse.