Good Morning Brew Daily Show, I'm Neil Fryman. And I'm Toby Howell. Today, a small Chinese lab may have upended the world of AI as we know it. Then Trump threatened the first trade war of his presidency, but not against the country you'd expect. It's Monday, January 27th. Let's ride.
All righty, the Super Bowl is set. My Philadelphia Eagles will take on the Kansas City Chiefs two Sundays from now in a rematch from 2023. The Chiefs won that game and then they won the title again last year. So this year they're seeking to become the first team in NFL history to pull off a Super Bowl three-peat. And only the Eagles in Saquon Barkley can stop them.
Neil, I am not afraid to say it. The Chiefs are the most unlikeable team in NFL history. You got the refs blatantly stealing games for them. You got Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelsey flopping left in, right? You're the fact that they are so good and they won't stop winning games. So needless to say, I am going to start pronouncing it. Wooter frequenting. Wawa's getting a saquon
Back tattoo because let's go birds. You are our only hope. I love what I hear Toby go off. Go off and go birds. Now a word from our sponsor Yahoo Finance Neil permission to tell everyone listening about my favorite Yahoo Finance feature permission granted Toby. Well, this is an ad for Yahoo Finance.
Thank you, Neil. My favorite Yahoo Finance teacher is this subtle design decision where they show how a stock is trading if it is mentioned in a headline. For instance, take the headline, Wall Street Bets Tesla's 2025 sales will miss Elon Musk's target. Just below that headline, you can see how Tesla is doing in pre-market trading. It's down 1.4%.
I see why you look at you get context from the headline and the reaction of the market all in one glance. And that's just a single headline, a full scan of Yahoo Finance's homepage, and you'll learn all the storylines that are driving the market for the day. Then if you want to go deeper, boom, click the article and get the context you need to make informed investing decisions. If you want to check out my favorite feature, head to yahoofinance.com and start perusing. That's Yahoo Finance.com.
American AI dominance is under serious threat after a Chinese company dropped a powerful new model that can go toe to toe with the very best open AI has to offer, but at a fraction of the cost. Deepseak is a relatively unknown AI research lab from China that dropped an open source model last week that flipped the AI industry on its head. According to a paper from the company, it's top of the line R1 model
matches or beads competitors like OpenAI's O1 on most math and reasoning benchmarks. But it's not just DeepSeek's performance that has the U.S. spooked, it's the fact that it was able to develop such a model in the face of U.S. export controls that severely limit the amount of chips Chinese companies can buy. Given the restraints, Chinese research labs like DeepSeek have been forced to do more with less and thus found a way to train their models much more efficiently using limited compute they have available.
But here's the real kicker. R1 is open source and free to use, which will seriously hurt subscriber-only models like OpenAI's $200-a-month chat GPT Pro subscription. They'll scale AI CEO Alexander Wang, one of the more notable founders in the industry put it best. He called the models coming out of DeepSeek Earth shattering.
This is a literal earthquake and as of this morning, it is toppling the stock market. As of 5am Nasdaq, futures were down nearly 4%. S&P 500 was down more than 2% in video stock is down 10%. There's a total tech wipeout. So I encourage you to maybe just hold off on looking at your stock portfolio today because
It is a massive collapse, and it is all due to deep-seek, which is so insane because this news has been percolating out over the past week. It has been all the talk in Silicon Valley. You have huge AI players like Mark Andreessen, who leads a big venture capital firm that invests in AI.
just absolutely gushing about it saying, this is the best thing I've seen since sliced bread. So there's a very huge impact that we're seeing from deep-seak on the stock market right now. It upends, you said it upends the AI industry. It certainly upends the investment case for these large tech companies. The idea was that you have to spend hundreds of billions
tens of billions of dollars to build AI models. If you can just do it in five with five point six million dollars like Deepseek did, then maybe more people could get involved in these tech companies don't have the big moat that we thought they did. And I do just want to give some context on who is Deepseek? Where did Deepseek even come from? It has a very unconventional story. It actually started out as an AI model that was built for a Chinese quant
hedge fund, they were literally building it as a side project. The CEO and the founder of the hedge fund was like, I was just curious about AI. Obviously it was helping with the trading aspect, but they were taking the funds and the profits they were making from the hedge fund and putting it into this AI side research project. But because the AI, or just because the US has these pretty strict export controls about the amount of high-end Nvidia chips that can go over to China, they were working with
a basically a tenth of the compute power that someone like I met or someone like an open AI is working with. So those constraints kind of built or forced deep-seek to come up with way more efficient methods to train its models. They didn't necessarily come up with a brand new method. They just combined a bunch of different ones together and it led to these greater efficiency gains. So now this is out in the open. It is open source so other companies can start
Copying their approach will which will lead to efficiency gains which could you know Topo Nvidia from being one of the most valuable companies because if you need less of their chips then maybe Nvidia is a little bit overvalued right now So there's a lot of second order third order effects that come from deep seek releasing this model
What do you think the big CEOs of the tech companies are thinking right now? We just had Mark Zuckerberg who leads meta come out on Friday with a big post on thread saying how they were going to invest so much money into AI. He pegged that this year at anywhere from like $55 billion to $60 billion to building huge data centers. So much money has been poured into AI infrastructure.
We at SoftBank and OpenAI did do that big announcement of $100 billion that could go up to $500 billion. That is what they've put the price tag on building a world class AI model. And Deepsea comes along and says, no, we can do it for a 20th of that price. This is insane. And that's why you see the market absolutely, you know, clobbering these tech giants right now is because maybe you don't need all this money to build a world class AI model.
The one, I mean, you can call it coke. I'm going to use the word coke that I was seeing from around the industry is that they're in economics. There's this thing called J. Vaughn's paradox, which occurs when tech progress increases the efficiency with which a resource is used. So think about maybe back this. This was coined back in 1865. It was about coal power plants becoming a lot more efficient.
And the government thought like, oh, coal power plants are much more efficient. That means we're going to need less coal. The exact opposite happens when efficiency gains are reached. Actually, more of that resource ends up being used. So that is what I've been kind of seeing from some tech leaders is like, hey, this is not Armageddon. What's actually going to happen is we're going to even see more demand for AI chips because of these efficiency gains. So there's a couple ways to look at it. You can look at it that it is going to be a bloodbath that will wipe out Nvidia's dominance or
Nvidia could just become more entrenched than ever due to these efficiencies. And we have to mention the geopolitical angle too because the US and China are locked in this huge arms race for AI supremacy. And we thought the US had the lead because we have OpenAI and Microsoft and Meta and these other tech giant Nvidia. But now this Chinese company comes along and shows that it has parity with the US.
It looks like whatever export controls we had to keep China from competing with the US have not been working.
Let's stay on the topic of geopolitical tension. Trump issued a barrage of tariffs over the weekend, but not at a country you'd expect like Mexico or China. Instead, it was Colombia, a longtime U.S. Allian Latin America that was in Trump's crosshairs. On Sunday, President Trump said he would impose tariffs and sanctions against Colombia after its president, Gustavo Petro, refused to accept two U.S. flights carrying deported migrants.
As a result, the president said he would slap a 25% tariff on all Colombian imports, which include commodities like crude oil and coffee, promising to raise them again to 50% in one week. If the tariffs weren't enough, Trump also said he would fully impose financial sanctions against Colombia, tossing in a travel ban for good measure.
By the end of the day, though, Colombia had given in to Trump's demands of verding a costly trade war. But the show of force was likely meant to dissuade other countries from getting similar ideas. Quote, it sends a powerful message to the world that not even old political allies are safe if they do not cooperate Bloomberg wrote. Neil, this is the first, but certainly not the last time that we will see Trump using economic pressure to force a country to bend to an American first policy.
I don't think anyone woke up yesterday morning thinking that we would be in a full-blown trade war with Colombia, which you mentioned is one of our top allies in Latin America, but that is exactly what happened. Looks like the Colombian president refused to accept these flights. Now, he has accepted many hundreds of migrant deportations coming from the United States over the past few years. He objected to the use of the military aircraft, and we sent two
military aircraft carrying migrants there. And he said, no, we don't want that. You have to treat them humanely and with dignity. And then he got into a war of words with Trump on social media. And then Trump said, you know what? Well, I've had it. We are going to do 25% tariffs that are going up to 50% next week. And as you mentioned, we have a lot of leverage over Columbia's economy because they said we are their top trading partner. They send coffee and
crude oil and all of these goods to the United States. Trump identified this as a point of leverage because if 25% tariffs go into effect, that makes those goods cost a lot more to ship into the United States. There goes the American consumer market. 50% is almost impossible to overcome. Colombian exporters get hurt. US consumers also get hurt. But the fact is that Colombia's economy is fragile. Trump identified the point of leverage and Colombia back down by the end of the day.
And on the flip side, the US imports about $16 billion of goods from Colombia in 2023. That ranked 26 on our list of import partners. So it's not like it's going to really affect too much in the US economy if we lose Colombia as a big partner.
except for coffee. Coffee is one of those big commodities. It makes up about a quarter of US coffee imports. So Starbucks CEO Brian Nickel is probably looking at this going, are you kidding me right now? Columbia of all places. But I think it does show you are right that even though there is not a ton of policy overlap between immigration policy and
economic and trade policies. Trump is planning to use them both in tandem to get what he wants. So I said it was the first time that we saw him doing this. We're only two weeks into his presidency, but it likely will not be the last. And it's January 27th. Now we know there's a February 1st deadline. That is Saturday for these big tariffs to go into effect on Mexico, Canada and China. And the Wall Street Journal reported just this morning that momentum is growing among Trump advisors that
you know, let's not that they're going to forgo the negotiation process and just slap Mexico and Canada with tariffs. That would be on an economic impact of orders of magnitude bigger than what we'd see on Columbia. So the clock is ticking for the February 1st tariff deadline.
If you're claimed to fame as a chef is making omelettes, you might want to pick up a few new recipes. The prices of eggs have gone from, wow, that's pretty expensive too. That's almost a quarter of my rent in recent months, and they're not expected to go down any time soon. Pricey eggs may be the new normal.
The reasons are a noxious mix of record demand and constrained supply. On the supply side, the bird flu that's been devastating flocks for two years now has only intensified. About 10% of the US's egg-laying population, more than 38 million chickens, have been killed in the last three months alone to prevent the spread of the disease. 10% of the supply poof. Then, on the demand side, you're all eating way more eggs than you used to. Higher prices be darned. The industry has seen more than
20 consecutive months, nearly two years worth of record high demand, perhaps because eggs are increasingly seen as an affordable vehicle for protein. And as I said before, new normal. You might want to get used to this. With the end of bird flu, nowhere in sight, egg prices are projected to jump. Another 20% in 2025, far above the 2.2% inflation for food prices in general.
I mean, eggs are the poster child of what people have been struggling with and hate about the elevated prices we've been seeing over the last few years. One of the reasons is you buy them very regularly, so you're actually pretty familiar with their price point and you can tell when they go up or down. They're ingredients and a lot of food. I mean, bakers out there use them, breakfast lovers out there use them. They are just one of the more
ubiquitous ingredients. And then you're right, there's been this kind of rise in healthier eating and protein kicks and eggs are this supposedly affordable source of protein, except they're not so affordable anymore. The problem with this bird flu epidemic is that you have to call basically an entire flock if one chicken, if one bird is infected because that's how infective this disease is that it can take down an entire flock. So you are seeing just these
really large cooling events where they're killing these birds because of single infections, which is just devastating the supply side of the industry. And my eighth grade teacher, Mrs. Roy, would actually not be happy with me because I didn't provide any evidence to say that their egg prices were going up. So I don't want you to just believe me. I have the numbers.
A dozen large grade A eggs was $4.15 in December. That's up from $3.65 in November, just one month before. And then egg prices year over year have jumped 36% in December. So we are seeing some truly skyrocketing prices. The thing is, it's not totally filtering down to the retail level because wholesale prices have skyrocketed
And even more than what you'd find at the grocery store. They've gone from about $2.50 to above $7. But grocery stores and restaurants use eggs as a loss leader. They say, we're not going to make so much money on eggs. Maybe we're going to even lose money, but we're going to use it to get you in the door to buy more expensive items. So they're paying over $7 for a dozen eggs and they're discounting it for us. But who knows how much longer they're willing to absorb those price hikes. And you know what's coming around the corner?
Easter, which is a quite egg-heavy holiday, so it doesn't look like there's going to be a loss in demand anytime soon. Up next, it is time for our winners of the weekend.
We know our listeners are above average. And that means you deserve above average everything, including your savings account interest rate. The Obank's money market savings account offers exactly that. Foted as the best money market account by Go banking rates, its interest rate paid is 10 times the national average.
Interest is compounded daily, helping you grow your money fast. Plus, as a division of mid-first bank, it's FDIC insured up to $250,000, and there are no monthly fees. All of this means you have the flexibility to grow your money and access it whenever you want or need to. Start growing your money and the award-winning Cornerstone Money Market savings account by going to veobank.com slash morning brew. That's veibank.com slash morning brew.
Attention investors new and seasoned. If you're looking for an investing platform with a broad range of asset classes and tools, public.com is ready when you are on public. You can build a multi asset investment portfolio of stocks, options, bonds, crypto and more.
Generate fixed income with a suite of yield accounts like Publix's high-yield cash account set at an industry leading 4.1% APY. Publix also has alpha, an AI-powered investment research assistant that can answer questions about any stock. They're a U.S.-based company and a member of FINRA with an award-winning customer support team trusted by millions.
Fund your account in five minutes or less and you could earn up to $10,000. Yes, 10K when you transfer your old investment portfolio. Start at public.com slash morning brew. That's public.com slash morning brew paid for by public investing full disclosures and podcast description.
Welcome to winners of the weekend, the segment where Toby and I picked two things that just earned a place in the morning brew daily, Super Bowl. Toby, you won the pre-show lip syncing competition. Toxic was a great choice, so you get to go first. My winner of the weekend is sports betting parlays. No, not because I hit on a big multi-leg bet this weekend, but because they are fast becoming sports books' chief money maker. Parlays accounted for 27%
of all sports betting in Illinois, New Jersey and Colorado last year, up from 22% in 2021. These types of bets are popular with sports fans because they represent the tantalizing opportunity to turn small wagers into big winnings thanks to long odds that arise when you link multiple bets together. And sports books love them because they get a bigger cut from parlays than single bets. Parlays contributed about 56% of sports betting revenue
after payouts in those same states during those same periods. Gambling companies are also relying on them to bring in more casual newcomers into the sports betting world instead of dropping $5 on a Chief's Super Bowl win. Customers who bet small are increasingly favoring parlays. FanDuel said that 90% of its same game parlay have bets of $30 or less, while over half are $5 or less.
Neil tossed in a mass of influencers big and small, putting their names and follower accounts behind pushing parlays, and you have a potent money-making machine for gambling sites. The economics of these are great for the gambling sites. As you mentioned, they accounted for 27% of the money wagered in those three states, but they delivered 56%.
of total revenue. And that's because parlays are really hard to win. But as a Wall Street Journal calls them, they're the new American lottery ticket you can bet anywhere from $1 to $5 in stand to make hundreds of dollars. The odds are long, but you know, they're that big pot at the end of the rainbow does sound pretty tantalizing. And sports books know this. So they are promoting the heck out of parlays, about 20% of all money spent by DraftKings on national TV ads.
hyped parlays. They're leveraging influencers like Bill Simmons and Charles Barkley. They're putting fun names around these parlays. They're packaging them up into particular themes. So, for example, on Christmas Day, they had the Chiefs were playing. They had a parlay called Mary Chief Smith, and you can bet on many different types of Chiefs bets all linked together. And I should mention, you are likely to lose a parlay because the more you
You have to hit on every single one. They're all interconnected. So if you lose one leg, you lose all of your money. But the reason, you know, the reason why parlays are so exciting is because if that does hit, it's pretty good. Yeah, that, I think that's the big point here is that they're very aspirational. I mean, you can call them lottery tickets because what happens when you kind of piece this parlay together
You see the odds just go up and you see the potential winnings. And in your mind, you're like, oh, that's what I'm stand to win. But it's really what you're standing to lose here because these are pretty small odds. The more bet you link together, the higher those odds become. So you can see why DraftKings, why FanDuel are kind of putting a ton of marketing spend behind it. DraftKings is actually also testing a subscription service out that would give customers access to better parlay odds. So they're just figuring out different ways to come up with
Narratives that push parlays different ways to offer customers better odds with those parlays because all it is is just this big intention grabber in the sports betting industry and a big money maker. The storytelling you can do with them I think is a big part. So as a Super Bowl comes up over these next few weeks, expect to see a lot of parlays packaged together in punny ways.
My winner of the weekend is Coca-Cola because they just signed a lease for the best real estate around the Costco food court. During Costco's earnings call last week, the CEO confirmed rumors that the retailer would be switching from Pepsi products to Coke products in its food court, ending a partnership that had been in place since 2013. It is a big win for Coke over its rival and will allow it to extend its market share dominance. Coke Classic had an estimated 19.2% share of the US carbonated soft drink market last year.
more than double Pepsi's 8.3%. So what prompted the change? It is all about the $1.50 hot dog and a soda combo, of course. During the last switch over in 2013, Costco opted for Pepsi because it offered a better deal that would allow Costco to preserve the most sacrosanct promotion in business. So it's possible that Coke agreed to lower its price for Costco to win the new contract because, as one exec said, it's our job to preserve the integrity of the price point.
Toby, there was a lot of chatter online about this move. People are very passionate about it. I would say most people welcome the change. Others were sad to see Pepsi go. This $1.50 hot dog price is holy. It is the most important marketing tool Costco has. It's just become very synonymous with the Costco brand. I mean, you already introduced the concept of a loss leader earlier in the A section of our show. Costco loses money on this deal.
be honest here, they cannot actually sell a hot dog in a Coke for a dollar and 50 cents. But because it brings people through the door, it gets them shopping on other things where they do make a profit on, they do continue to offer this deal. And yeah, so part of me thinks that this announcement is just to get that
a hot dog deal back in the news. Again, Costco has been facing some backlash on its DEI policy. So announcing that Coke is coming in instead of Pepsi. It's just another way to get that headline reading about the dollar and 50 cent deal. But I think people are.
Excited because Coke Classic is a larger share of the market. Pepsi's market share has been slowly falling since its peak in 1995. It used to be 15% of the US carbonated soft drink market. It's now right around 8%. So maybe it is something that is saving money. Maybe it is just something that they're like, oh, more people like Coke. Let's go back to Coke. But I think people are happy in general.
Yeah, I mean, if you go down the line though for fast food companies, whether they use Coke or Pepsi, Coke definitely has the bigger hitters as McDonald's and Burger King, but it doesn't have everyone Taco Bell uses Pepsi, Buffalo Wild Wings uses Pepsi, Panera uses Pepsi, and then Subway last year announced it was switching from Coke to Pepsi. So I would say Coke has the bigger power players, but Pepsi has, you know, a few Taco Bells is a big contract.
Where do you land on the Coke first Pepsi? This is such a tired debate. I can't wait a minute. It is a very tired debate, Toby. I don't even want to indulge you, but I haven't had Pepsi in many years. I haven't had Coke in many years. Yeah, you're not a big soda guy, but I mean, actually, when I do drink a Coke, like once a year.
It's so good. Pepsi, I don't know about. If last week's head spinning news felt like devouring a massive lunch at 2 p.m. then try to regain your appetite. We've got a 530 p.m. dinner reservation. Here's what you need to know about the busy week ahead. The Fed is going to meet on Wednesday for the first time this year and for the first time of the Trump presidency.
The actual interest rate announcement won't be so exciting because the Fed is pretty much guaranteed to hold rates steady. But Chair Jerome Powell's press conference should be must-see TV. We're all going to be keen to learn how many rate hikes he thinks will be on the table this year and how he'll respond to Trump's recent threat at Davos that he demand rates come down.
Yeah, I think that's going to be the exciting part. How is he going to navigate this relationship that he once again has with President Trump? If this is the first meeting, which it likely will be that they don't raise interest rates, I don't think Donald Trump is going to like that. So it's going to be a little bit of drama coming out, even though this is just a kind of standard Fed meeting.
If all that weren't enough to keep Wall Street busy, we're about to enter what Jim Kramer calls a sheer hell week due to a blast of earnings. And this is one of those rare times you should probably listen to him. More than 100 of the S&P 500 companies will release their Q4 financials this week, highlighted by big tech players like Microsoft, Tesla and Meta. And I feel like what happened with DeepSeek today is going to throw every narrative out of the window. And you're going to see these CEOs have to respond to what happened over there.
My hot take is that I'm looking at Starbucks' earning reports to figure out how it's turned around as going under new CEO Brian Nickel. They just released their first kind of national ad campaign that showed baristas writing names in Sharpies on customers' cups. They've been really trying to focus on this return to that coffee house feel. So let's, I'm curious to see how that focus is translating into results.
Trump's cabinet confirmations here and continue with the most important of them all, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on Wednesday. Trump tapped RFK Jr. to lead the Department of Health and Human Services, which would grant him major control over 18 agencies that oversee health care and food policy
RFK Jr.'s nomination has been very controversial over his previous conspiracy theorizing, such as debunked claims linking vaccines to autism, so there should be serious fireworks over his past comments and views, and major implications for big pharma and big food should he be confirmed.
and major implications of related to another story we talked about today. Remember Kennedy would oversee the CDC, which would be in charge of kind of managing the bird flu and make sure it doesn't translate to humans. So that's just another thing that would be under his purvey and control. Should he be confirmed?
Today, memorials and ceremonies are taking place all over the world for International Holocaust Remembrance Day. This year's commemoration is special. It marks the 80th anniversary of when Soviet troops liberated Auschwitz. And finally, on Wednesday is Lunar New Year.
With it comes the year of the snake, the wood snake to be specific. Every year, the lead up to this holiday sets off an epic travel rush, which analysts call the biggest migration of humans ever. In China, more than 510 million train trips and 90 million flights are expected to be taken during a 40-day period around Lunar New Year as people head home to celebrate with their families.
Yeah, so it's the Chinese zodiac calendar you give it's a 12 year cycle represented by 12 different animals. So year of 2025 will be snakes in Chinese culture snakes are considered symbols of harvest procreation spirituality and good fortune, but they're also considered symbols of cunning evil threat and terror.
terror. And then again, Chinese cosmology each year is also associated with one of five elements, gold, wood, water, fire, and earth, which create this six-year cycle. So this is the year of the wood snake. So what specifically is the wood snake? That is a charming, intelligent, and creative, but also secretive, cunning, sometimes ruthless. So 2025 babies, I don't know if you can trust them, but I think they do have some of that je ne sais quoi.
That is all the time we have. Thanks so much for starting your morning with us and have a wonderful start to the week. For any questions, comments or feedback, send an email to morningbrewdaily at morningbrew.com. And if you're enjoying the show, do your best Paul Revere impression and gallop through the countryside telling everyone you see about it. If that doesn't quite appeal to you or your horsemanship skills are a little bit lacking, just take Toby's sharing advice instead.
That was pretty good, Neil, but I want you to share the pod with all these snakes in your life. All those creative and charming, but also cunning and ruthless friends. We all have them. It's their year, so send them this show. Let's roll the credits. Emily Milliron is our executive producer. Raymond Liu is our producer. Olivia Graham is our associate producer. Yuchenoa Ogu is our technical director. Garrett Peck is on audio. Hera Makeup lost a 12-leg parlay last night. Devin Emory is our chief content officer and our show is a production of Morning Brew.
Great. Show day, Neil. Let's run it back tomorrow.