Smashing the Western Illusion of Democracy

Democracy, often seen as an ideal system, is facing serious doubts in the West. Many believe it is not functioning properly, with signs evident in flawed elections in places like France. Influential thinkers, from Hume to Montesquieu, have pointed out that true democracy can rarely be achieved, as societies tend to be governed by a small elite. While earlier democratic movements sought a more direct form of democracy, practical challenges led to the acceptance of representatives. However, this shift has fostered misconceptions, leading people to believe representatives act in the public's best interest. Instead, history shows that decisions often lie in the hands of a few, leaving the general populace feeling uninformed and disconnected from political processes.

Tocqueville cautioned that in a democracy, people might become so focused on making money that they neglect political involvement. Many voters feel their single vote doesn’t matter, leading to a lack of interest in politics. Factors like time constraints, ignorance, and the absence of ambition hinder their ability to engage meaningfully in governance. Consequently, even though representatives are elected, citizens often feel disconnected from decision-making in crucial areas such as foreign and economic policies. This detachment is essential to recognize, especially since democracy is viewed positively; people tend to overlook that true influence often rests with a small ruling minority. Accepting that they have limited control can be challenging for the majority, despite the fact that their lives are significantly affected by the policies crafted by those in power.

Democracy, while appealing, often struggles to cope with the rapid changes in society such as economics and technology. Political systems are inherently unstable, leading to tensions when the ruling minority imposes its will on the majority, disregarding their concerns. As government grows, it interferes more with private property and individual interests. The complexities of voting reveal that democracy isn’t always fair, as it can favor a majority while excluding other voices. This constant shift between majority and minority interests can destabilize any political system. A smaller, more limited government can better protect property rights and create a more stable society by reducing conflicts and ensuring everyone's voices matter. Democrats are hopeful, but as the system adapts poorly to change, democratic conditions can worsen, calling for a reevaluation of state intervention and the role of government in society to create a fairer equilibrium.

Limiting state power is crucial for reducing political stress and fostering stability in society, regardless of whether the system is democratic. Emphasizing individual rights and a free market can lead to a more adaptable society. We should prioritize freedom over democracy, as the latter doesn't always ensure personal liberties. Many in the West wrongly equate democracy with freedom, which is a dangerous misunderstanding. Achieving true liberty doesn't solely depend on majority rule, as seen in the negative effects of welfare spending and fiscal redistribution. Historical thinkers like Tocqueville valued liberty above democracy. It’s essential to dispel the misconception that democracy guarantees freedom and focus on protecting individual liberties instead.