RFK Jr. Challenges the System While Starmer’s UK Falls Apart – SF529
en
January 30, 2025
TLDR: Discussion with Neil Oliver on RFK Jr.'s confirmation battle, scrutinizing Big Pharma's influence in politics and media. Meanwhile, Keir Starmer's leadership troubles are discussed due to policies fueling fears of Britain's dismantling. His past connection to Jimmy Savile case raises questions about elite cover-ups.

In the latest episode of Stay Free with Russell Brand, Russell is joined by Neil Oliver to discuss crucial political dynamics in the U.S. and the U.K. This episode, titled RFK Jr. Challenges the System While Starmer’s UK Falls Apart, dives deep into RFK Jr.’s confirmation process, revealing the trials he faces against powerful entities like Big Pharma, and calls attention to the faltering leadership of Keir Starmer in the U.K. This summary captures the essence of their conversation, highlighting key themes and insights.
Key Themes Discussed
RFK Jr.’s Confirmation Hearing
- Political Landscape: RFK Jr.'s current political battle serves as a representation of wider issues within the medical and political systems. His conflict with entrenched interests unveils the influence of Big Pharma over governmental decisions.
- Media Scrutiny: Media's relentless attacks on RFK Jr. reflect a broader strategy to undermine voices challenging established narratives. Russell and Neil engage in discourse on whether RFK's rise represents a genuine shift or a superficial change within the political environment.
- Public Trust: The pandemic has significantly shifted public perceptions towards health institutions and government agencies, leading to an opportunity for challengers like RFK Jr. to advocate for healthcare reform and transparency in vaccinations.
Keir Starmer and UK Politics
- Starmer's Leadership: Keir Starmer’s recent missteps, such as controversial tax hikes and perceived alignment with globalist agendas, contribute to his unpopularity. Russell articulates the growing discontent among the British populace, challenging Starmer’s initiatives.
- Media Control and Populist Movements: As populist figures and movements gain traction, the panel raises concerns about how elite control over media narratives may be a strategy to fracture these growing movements and maintain existing power structures.
- Grooming Gang Scandals: Neil highlights Starmer's tenure at the CPS and its implications, particularly regarding his inaction on the notorious Jimmy Savile case, questioning the integrity of the British governance system.
The Role of Alternative Voices in Politics
- Emerging Figures: Personalities like Andrew Tate and Tommy Robinson have become significant, albeit controversial, figures in British discourse. Their rising prominence indicates a shift towards voices that represent working-class sentiments but also risk polarization within the electorate.
- Media's Role: The discussion touches on how mainstream media often sensationalizes these figures, serving to distract from deeper systemic issues while exploiting cultural divides.
Insights and Takeaways
- Challenging the Narrative: The podcast underlines the necessity for ongoing scrutiny of established power structures. Both RFK Jr. and figures like Starmer illustrate the tension between populist initiatives and the elite’s attempts to maintain control.
- Public Engagement: Increased public engagement and skepticism towards leaders and institutions are vital for cultivating a political landscape that truly represents the populace's interests.
- Decentralization of Power: Russell emphasizes the need for a shift away from centralized power towards more localized governance models that prioritize community needs and individual freedoms.
Final Thoughts
In conclusion, the conversation hosted by Russell Brand with Neil Oliver serves as a critical examination of current political climates in both the U.S. and the U.K. It highlights the ongoing struggles against entrenched interests and the need for a more accountable governance system. Readers and listeners are encouraged to engage with these ideas critically, weighing the implications for the future of democracy in their respective countries.
Was this summary helpful?
Hello there, your awakening wanders. Thanks for joining us for a very special edition of Stay Free with Russell Brand. Today, I'm joined with Neil, I'm joined by Neil Oliver and Laura Logan. Although Laura Logan hasn't disappeared. Ironically, she's disappeared while traveling from the United States to Mexico, which is usually where the people that she's obsessed with being trafficked disappear, that very route. But in reverse, Laura Logan will be with us next week. We've waited quite late.
Neil to do this with Lara. And Lara, there's no nice way of putting it, stood us up. If wherever you're watching us, X, YouTube, we'll be with you for a while, then we'll be exclusively available on Rumble. We'll be talking about the key stories of this week and how they impact unfolding global media narratives. Neil Oliver is the person in the world I'd most like to discuss these matters with after Lara Logan, and she's not turned up. So it's me and you, Neil. Thank you for staying awake in the highlands.
I'm absolutely delighted to be with you. It's not really all that late here in the Northern latitudes of the United Kingdom of Britain. It's late in Northern Florida. Here on the Redneck Riviera, there's no, this is, I mean, this is, I mean, we are in the very, it's twilight at best. Let's have a look at our first story, mate. Let's have a look at a 30 seconds of RFK speaking to the confirmation hearing.
There's a lot of ways that you can influence those future lawsuits and pending lawsuits while you are Secretary of HHS. And I'm asking you to commit right now that you will not take a financial stake in every one of those lawsuits so that what you do as Secretary will also benefit you financially down the line.
I'll comply with all the ethical guidelines. That's not the question. You and I, you have said, you're asking me, Senator, you're asking me not to move vaccine. No, I am not. Yeah, you are. That's exactly what you're doing.
Neil, what fascinates me mostly about RFK's confirmation hearing is that RFK is a kind of living sinec decay for so many issues. Can we rely on conspiracy theories? What are our views on vaccines? Is an alliance between former liberals and Republicans desirable, even possible? What did you see much of the confirmation hearing and what did you think?
I did, I did, I watched, I watched, I dipped in and out of it and I find it, I just find it depressing. I find the, I mean, we were all, all of us were psyched up with the idea that something new was coming in.
And I think a very significant part of the inspiration for the thought that it was going to be something new was the idea of RFK Jr.
I don't think Donald Trump would have had the success that he had in the election had it not been for RFK Junior standing alongside him. And to see him being pulled apart and attacked in the way that he has been across the board in that way, I just find deeply
deeply depressing. I felt that the RFK Juniors Association with that incoming administration was significant. I even begin to wonder now if we're going to see any of that potential realized at all, given the way that he's being pecta and pecta in the hearing that's going on just now.
Do you think that if he gets into office at all, it will be in an impeding and impaired way? Or do you think the hearing indicates to us that there are entrenched bureaucratic powers that are immovable? And how do you think that it's significant?
In the light of the recent announcement that there will be investigation into AI, mRNA vaccines. And to see Albert Baller confidently addressing Davos and talking about cancer vaccines as if the pandemic never happened. Because another thing that RFK I suppose represents is how much the world changed during the pandemic, how many people came to different perspectives, including maybe to a degree.
Do you and I among the sort of millions or hundreds of millions of people who lost their trust in the medical and scientific establishment along with the government and legacy media? RFK in a sense is the central beneficiary of that sea change. You could argue certainly if he does indeed become the secretary for health of the United States of America in a way that's meaningful.
Do you think that seeing the sort of announcement that there will be further investigation into AI, MRNA, technology isn't to see baller confidently posturing at Davos indicates that, you know, the world's not changed overnight with the election of Donald Trump? Well, it does look as though the world has not changed overnight. I would like to think, you know, in my dream assessment of what's going on, I'd like to think that behind the scenes, RFK Junior had had a head in hands moment.
When, you know, when he was listening to, you know, Larry Ellison of, um, of Oracle Corporation, you know, speak about tailored, uh, uh, uh, MRNA vaccines and, you know, and 48 hour, uh, prescriptions for a personalized MRNA job that was going to protect an individual from a cancer that artificial intelligence had identified, you know, that, that, that person might be, uh, uh,
vulnerable to in the future. And then yes, you know, then the fact that Bill Gates has been out there celebrating the fact that he was at Marilago for three hours, talking to Donald Trump and apparently they had a very enthusiastic conversation about the perpetuation of the development of this kind of technology, and then Berla of Pfizer at Davos
you know, trumpeting more of the same. I find it deeply depressing. I spoke to, I'm sure you have as well, or you've probably had the opportunity at least to listen to Ed Doubt, former Black Rock,
investment manager turned whistle-blower. I spoke to him and he was talking about a red line for him that if he didn't hear the new administration in short order on getting into office, who are any the platform as having been up.
a danger to human life, that that was going to be a very significant moment for him. And already just a week into the new administration, you know, to hear the usual suspects, Bill Gates, Borla,
You're talking about Larry Ellis and Oracle talking up the potential of mRNA artificial intelligence. You're tailor making these targeted warheads, I think, was the language that Borla used. It breaks my heart.
Oh, no, yeah, because to some degree it felt like about turns from Zuckerberg and the news that Facebook could be opening up again as if after the fall of some cyber iron curtain could be regarded as heartening. But it seems that your analysis, Neil, is this is just the re-poing of the.
pieces on the chessboard of power. Zuckerberg sort of shifts a little to the left gate shuffles a little to the right. Larry Ellison announces MRNA technology. And before you know it's as if nothing changed when it appeared like, oh, wow, Trump, this weird, well, not, it was not sort of weird in a sense, sort of,
In some regard, a stereotype of what a president might be. I've said before, Neil, I'm keep saying it like an American mystic. The idea America has of itself came alive. A McDonald's eat in jet flying with his own name on it, sort of American mystic. But what got, you know, after the 2016 presidency where, you know, what really changed. I was asked people from either side, they're sort of incredibly excited about these things. What seemed more interesting this time at least was the
In particular, the alliance with RFK and Tulsi Gabon, we've touched on this before, but if all that can be somehow muted, neutered, diluted and isn't effective and meaningful, then I start to wonder what silhouette becomes visible in the midst of the maneuvering of true global power.
I've always, well, I've long suspected, you know, people like yourself, people like me, you know, we've been, you know, very troubled by what we've read and understood about mRNA, about the determination, you know, to get the mass of the population into some kind of regime, you know, whereby we live in expectation of the next,
unsolicited medical intervention.
And I've always, for the longest time, I tried to swim clear of, to kick away from the idea that we were being headed towards some kind of digital cage, some kind of imprisonment from which it was hard to escape. I've listened to other commentators that I trust talking about in the context of the situation in the United States where
where people depend upon health insurance in order to get treatment for whatever, and the idea that a situation like that which is made possible by this idea of biannual injections for mRNA, that if people didn't submit to that cycle,
that it could be quite, it would be quite easy to invalidate or for health insurance to invalidate people's policies if they weren't prepared to, you know, to stand in line to get these anti-cancer prophylactics. All of which makes sense to me and in so many ways I have been, you know, I have been
you know, living in expectation of in fear of the continued development of the means by which we would be put into positions where we had even less choice, even less freedom. And to hear in the first few days of the new administration in the White House seeming to facilitate the further development of the very thing that I fear is really, to be quite honest with you, it's the
I keep on saying to people, wait and see, be optimistic, you know, give people the benefit of the doubt. But already, already, I think the music is suggestive of, it's just on the same tracks, we're still being moved in the same direction. And I find that profoundly troubling.
We can't continue on X and YouTube and Facebook or wherever. We're going to be exclusively available for the rest of this conversation on Rumble. Click the link over in the description now. What's troubling you? Before you even comment, I hear myself seeing that.
I referenced David Eicholot. I referenced David Eicholot and I sometimes I'm worried that I referenced David Eich so much because I know there will be people to whom the name David Eich is hardly a sigil of authenticity, integrity and good journalism if some regard him as a kind of hysteric, alunatic and anti-Semite.
What my fascination is with David Eich and Alex Jones seems to have been amalgamated into a kind of a new milieu, perhaps somewhat because of his relationship with Joe Rogan, perhaps because of his relationship with Elon Musk.
X, and it leaves for me the figure of Ike, a shadowy turquoise clad prophet on the edge of some aisle, perhaps near where you are, Neil, sort of screaming into that metaphorical, but perhaps some more actual wilderness.
The reason I would cite here is because David I would say it does not matter if you vote for Donald Trump and MAGA and RFK. All of these interests are being directed. They're owned. They're all marinets on a stage that's controlled by interest. They're not only globalist interests when it comes to matters of territory, dominion and political control. There are
He's always been really explicit about what he believes in occultist powers like the stuff that you will now see sort of on ex Propagated and discussed and it goes somewhat viral this when people talk about a drenochrome and occultism and sex parties What I've felt is like you know in this kind of independent media era born or somewhat of social media and
You see with someone like Whitney Webb, like, oh, wow, Leopstein's staff does appear to be connected to intelligence agencies. So yeah, sex, sex, sex, sex. Then the Diddy staffs, you've got sort of showbiz, a cult. And then you hear, then the UFO staff become sort of more prevalent. We chatted to Jeremy Corbell, pre recently. And I just wonder,
If, look, if it turns out that Trump's presidency, even in alliance with figures like RFK, if RFK gets confirmed and Tulsi gets confirmed and still basically things don't significantly change, then, well, even this new surge of nationalistic populism, which isn't confined to Mecca, even though it's perhaps best exemplified by it, it's happened all over the world.
Even that is part of some overall schematic that prevents it. What then are we to do with the peripheral figures that have been saying stuff like this for so long? Is there a point where we just go, come on, and, David, what do you reckon we do? First of all, you mentioned, well, obviously, we were talking about
Donald Trump, you mentioned Tulsi Gabbard, but we've already talked about or we've mentioned Robert Kennedy Jr. I don't doubt that some or all of these people have
have carried intentions and desires to do the right thing, to change the direction of the ship of state. But I've always suggested that if you take the actual personalities involved out of it, it doesn't matter whether it's them or anyone else, I do wonder how the possibility
of any individuals, any handful of individuals being able to change that direction. It's too much to ask. And I'm definitely not about to be, you know, I'm not about to write people off at all and say, well, they were just part of the show. I mean, maybe they are, maybe they are. But I think it's absolutely too early to make that call. We can't make this content for you without the support of our partners. Here's a message from one now.
Whoa, how did that get there? Is that freedom straight out of my bowels and into your mouth? Don't dwell on that image. This is a delicious dark roast from 1775. Mmm, it smells like freedom. Did you know that drinking two to three cups of coffee daily can reduce your risk of death by 29%? No! And half your chances of heart complications? No! But what's the point if your coffee tastes like it was brewed by someone who thinks soy lattes are the pinnacle of human achievement?
1775 coffee is here to reclaim coffee from the woe karate. If such a thing is a word or a term even. Ham-picked Bolivian beans don't be disgusting. That is not a euphemism for, you know, flicking yep old. Roasted in the USA delivering pure single origin brilliance with our hint of deceit. Sweet truthful coffee is coffee for those seeking truth depth and the clarity to see through life's illusions, which is me and you.
Come on, get on board. The best part, every dollar you spend enters you to win, a blacked out 2024 Tesla Cybertruck, plus $30,000 of cash. Now, apparently I'm going to be driving around in this Cybertruck. I'll believe it when I actually see it, because I'm always getting told things like you're going to be driving around the Cybertruck.
and they never, ever appear. If this Cybertruck appears, that is gonna be, you will see me driver, I'm gonna drive it in the water. I'm gonna see if it works as Musk claims as an amphibious vehicle that can also be launched into space. Let's test those claims. Head to 7075, yes, a Cybertruck.
A modern day arc ready to navigate the floods of uncertainty. Is this a metaphor? Was the arc a metaphor? With the strength to carry you through any of life's trials. Head to 1775coffee.com, stock up and fuel your mornings with rebellion. Use this code for 15% off. Don't miss your chance to drive off in a cyber truck and cash out with 30 grammy. You can have a cyber truck. We could all have cyber trucks. Isn't that what we want? Coffee and cyber trucks? Let's get back to the content.
you know, you, you invoke David. Now, like you, I've been, I saw David, like, when he emerged, I mean, I was, I've known him, I've known about him forever. I remember him as a sports pundit.
just someone that commented on a football match that had taken place on whatever, on World of Sport or whatever. And then, of course, they went through that metamorphosis and they appeared saying some of the things that he has then developed over the last decades and all of the rest of it. And like many people have thought, goodness me, what's going on there? What's happened with that man? But I've looked into it. I've read two or three of these books.
I've listened to him speak and like so many people he's been he has been right.
He has predicted a direction of travel that's undeniable. He was right. He is right. And I've always had a lot of time for him, but he's more complicated than that. Like anyone, I don't just listen to and accept everything that he says, but there's absolutely no doubting that he's someone who is worth listening to.
If we are let down by the new administration that comes in, then, of course, people will, of course, again, again, elsewhere, you know, force solutions, I've gone through a process over the last few years where I am absolutely open-mindedly, open-heartedly ready to listen to anyone.
I will know, I will not dismiss, out of hand, anyone. I will listen to anyone. I will absolutely listen to what they have to say. And I am uncertain myself about almost everything.
You know, I feel as if I have felt for the last few years that I'm just in free fault. You know that feeling you get when you go over a humpback bridge or something in a car. And you think, and your stomach turns over and you think, oh, I've never felt a rounded sense. I've felt that weightlessness. I like that feeling.
What happens on a bridge? It's good when it's a split second, but I've felt like you've been in it for like years. You've been in that for years and years. That's a nightmare.
Now, here's what's happening. In a weird way, the confirmation of RFK is a brilliant place to look at that, because think of the subjects that come up, the pandemic, conspiracy theories, vaccine links to autism, watching attempts to marshal the conversation towards safe subjects, as it were, like abortion, negating the impact of big farmers' interests and influence when it comes to matters of policy. Some of like Bernie Sanders, you respect saying mad things, like, do you endorse this onesie?
Like, the whole world is insane. I know you mean you have this sort of sort of state of peripheral potential precipitous epiphany endlessly. Like, that's how I feel about it as well. You know, like we're talking a bit about- I think I listened to it.
You know, some of the stuff that's been leveled at RFK Jr., you know, Caroline Kennedy, you know, that stuff about, you know, she was referencing, you know, dorm room stuff. I mean, the guy's 70. How far back is she going to find him in his dorm room? And, you know, talking about the fact that, you know, that she's speaking dark about, you know, using a liquidizer for
They're chickens and mice to feed these hawks. Frankly, if you keep hawks...
You have to feed them baby chickens and whatever. That is how that is done. And that ad hominin attacked to try and make them seem sinister in that way. And of course, because it's coming from a cousin, you think, what is going on when someone as close to him as that who's known him all his life is bringing up this kind of stuff in an effort to bring him down?
And we're constantly being distracted from what I was drawn to at RFK Jr. Long before he was involved in any of this running for president, then not running for president and endorsing. Just when he was talking from that, children's health defense perspective of saying, can't we just ask some questions about all of this stuff that's being pumped into American children's bodies? Can't we ask about that? Because it's clearly not
The stats are starting to stack up and it's not looking good. And talking about toxicity in the food that was routinely being consumed by American people and American people being offered no alternatives, but to have these unhealthy lifestyles born of the food that they were being given. And you think, that guy is just asking very reasonable stuff. And then to have to watch him go through this process
of just being, you know, ripped, ripped into, hectic, you know, vulture style. They're not addressing the kind of basic questions that he is asking. He's simply saying, can't we do something to make American people healthier?
It has to be ripped apart for even suggesting that that might be a possibility. Again, I just find that heartbreaking. You mentioned that Ed Dowd's red line was the continuation of mRNA research. My own red line is Bobby Kennedy's confirmation.
What I felt like is if they find some way of not confirming Bobby Kennedy or he only has a brief tenure as Secretary of the HHS, lame, impeded and prevented from taking real action, that is how I will truly know that there hasn't been the emergence of a new political force
But actually, it's likely that we are just seeing a shellacking or reframing of old sets of power in a somewhat novel way. And just to chime in on the Caroline Kennedy's, I saw him blend her mouth. So I saw him blend her. I saw him made a make a fledgling milkshake. And I saw him in the dorms banging up smack like that.
I thought that when you make anything granular, it makes it starts to sound appalling. I think so much of the new hysteria around sex is that when you describe even, and particularly, not particularly, but when you describe consensual sex in granular detail, or think about it between consenting adults or your own parents,
It starts to become it messy and murky and uncomfortable. Well, there's absolutely nothing wrong with someone who keeps hawks blending a baby, baby mice and chicks because that's just normal.
in that context, if he was doing it, you know, and then sort of feeding it to people, but the fact is it would probably be a lot healthier than some of the dyes in, I don't know, fruit loops, which is standing up against. So he's sort of part of the relentless trivialisation and vilification, and the reason I find him such a fascinating figure is Bobby Kennedy couldn't have happened pre-pandemic. He's a creature of the pandemic. He goes into it,
you know, first as an ecological hero of the left through his sort of legal work, then as this sort of maligned figure because of his stance primarily on autism and vaccines, and then through the pandemic he sort of metamorphosizes into a hero of a new movement. If he don't get
confirmed that movement is significantly impaired and it gives an entirely new complexion to what's happened politically in the last four years. And I say, say, brings into sharp focus some of the AIM RNA stuff we've touched on earlier in our chat and what the sort of broader objective might be. Taking a little tangent all turn now for a moment. If you haven't seen my show, Break Bread, you must watch it next week when I'll be talking to Wesley Half.
If you're watching this on X or YouTube or anywhere but rumble, click the link in the description and join me and Neil will be talking about a variety of subjects. I mostly want to talk about what the hell's going on in British politics, what happens when figures like Tommy Robinson
And Andrew Tate has sort of positioned as a kind of public opposition to a kind of conventional political figure like Keir Starmer. And what is Keir Starmer doing wrong? This is kind of a long list, his position on grooming gangs, stroke rape. Rape gangs, as Lara Logan reminded us, we should refer to them last week. He's changed of direction when it comes to
taxes in particular, counsel taxes and his alarming drop in popularity. While something very novel might appear to be happening in American politics, it's more of the same in British politics and I'd love to discuss that with Neil. But before that, here's a quick word from one of our partners.
Lumen is the world's first handheld metabolic coach with just one breath first thing in the morning. Lumen can measure your metabolism. It lets you know if you're burning fat or carbs and gives you tailored guidance to improve your nutrition, workouts, sleep and stress management. No more cookie cutter one size fits all nutrition plans and nutrition plan just for you based on your first breath of the day. Morning make me fit a coach otherwise I'll breathe on you a little pocket son of a bitch.
Lumen gives you daily macro recommendations based on what's going on with your metabolism that day so you can fuel your body with what's best for you. Then, right before a workout, just breathe into Lumen and it will tell you if you're burning carbs or fat. Lumen will tell you if you need to carb up before a workout for an energy boost or if you're all set to go. Using this biofeedback, Lumen puts you in the most optimal state to get the most of your workouts
In the long run, these small changes really add up and make all the difference when trying to lose excess fat, gain muscle and improve your metabolic health. Scan the QR code to find out more. There's nothing I like less than doing a workout. Then thinking I wasted that workout. I could have got more. If I've done a bunch of hot yoga or Brazilian jujitsu or weightlifting and then find out that simply by using lumen, I could have extracted more bang for my buck. Well, I feel infuriated.
Lumen means with one single breath into your hand held coach which sounds like a disgusting scene in a school locker room you can get information that could change your life blow into your hand coach get some personal information and defy the odds lose fat all with Lumen
Like I do, before every workout to make sure I extract the max with a single breath into my palm coat each day, y'all. I'm here with Neil Oliver, the coast guy. He's the editor on the screen now. You should follow him wherever it's possible to get access to his incredible and insightful content over there in the UK, Neil, where you and I, yet await Lara Logan, who could still magically emerge and join our conversation. You must be shocked.
and struck by the peculiar decline of the United Kingdom. Was there anything approaching optimism when Keir Starmar was first elected? Or did you always regard him as a kind of bureaucrat or authoritarian former head of the CPS that had never stuck up for Julian Assange that appeared to squeal to the CIA on the subject of Jeremy Corbyn, a popular and populist left-wing leader of the Labour Party, the Starmar now heads? And tell me, what exactly is going on within breaking campaign pledges?
What's going on with the jailing of people for social media posts? And what is it atmosphere like, not that you can offer, I suppose, an entirely objective opinion on something like the atmosphere of a country? But if what we're seeing in the United States of America is the emergence of this new kind of populism that we're
as yet unable to fully discern whether it will truly reward the people that have supported it. What do you think's happening in the UK under starma? And where are we in that trajectory to assume that there is a common one, i.e. are we at some point in the coming months going to see reform or some sort of reform conservative alliance take power in our country?
It's a very fascinating sequence of events, I would say, that has unfolded in Britain in relation to Kirstama. Obviously, all across Europe, and obviously, Trump, on the other side of the Atlantic, is emblematic of the same movement. But all across Europe, we saw, and we have seen, we continue to see more and more
people within electorates voting for so-called populist parties. And, you know, obviously, populism has become a pejorative. You know, goodness me, people voting for what they want. How dare they?
And clearly there has been a movement in the direction of populism in Britain as well, as is manifest in the form of reform and all of the rest of it. But as has happened elsewhere in Europe.
this kind of determination by the incumbent regimes or the incumbent administrations to perpetuate the presence at the levers of power of people who seem to be doing the bidding of
You know, the people that were all worried about World Economic Forum, Club of Rome and all the rest of it. And Kirstalmer in Britain is a manifestation of that, you know, that determination to keep moving, to keep people moving towards an emiseration of the middle class, you know, the transfer of money from, you know, from the May to the few.
You know all of that is manifest in a personality like your star. I would say, you know, quite honestly I find him a person utterly without redeeming feature. I think he appears to me as an appalling human being. I cannot bear him. It's got to the point now where I'm almost full bit.
when I have to watch him, when I have to watch words and listen to words coming out of his mouth, I find him an unbearable presence.
Clearly, he is a spectacularly unpopular politician in Britain at the moment. You've alluded to some of the things that are making him unpopular. Most recently, ideas around tax, council tax, hikes, and all of the rest of it, more and more money being taken out of the pockets of people who don't have enough money, all being diverted elsewhere.
a reprehensible, a reprehensible human being, I would say, that Keir Stammer is. He's got all the unfortunate, to put it mildly, associations with what happened with the Jimmy Savile, non-prosecution. He alluded to the fact that he's overseeing a judiciary that's preferring to people, to incarcerate people for things that are saying on social media.
while room is being made for those people saying hearty things on social media by releasing all sorts of violent criminals. I have come to subscribe to the belief that Britain is being deliberately dismantled.
I think Britain is being demolished to create a brownfield site as it were. What happens when a tower block is dropped into its footprint and the rubble cleared and then something else can be put in its place. The statistics show that not in modern history has a population been so altered so quickly as has happened in the United Kingdom of Great Britain.
the indigenous population has been so flooded with an influx of new people. And you can get into who those people are and where they're coming from and what their motivations might be and their impact on local communities and all of the rest of it.
But to me, the biggest question is why has that happened? And I would say that Britain is in the crosshairs of those who are absolutely determined, absolutely determined to dismantle and to get rid of obstacles manifest in the form of nation states where people have a belief in the sanctity of the sovereign individual.
where they believe in rights to property, freedom of speech, equality before the law, trial by jury, nowhere else on earth is any of that more manifest than it is or has been in the United Kingdom of Britain, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain. And that is why it has fallen under the crosshairs of those who need to remove obstacles like that on the way to
One world government, they need to undermine the integrity of places like Britain. And Ciar Starmer in that context appears to me to be someone who has been drafted into position to, well, to tie up the loose ends.
Well, that's a brilliant, if damning, and terrifying perspective, Neil. Keir Starmer is a kind of conduit and funnel to the new world order, exactly the type of politician required to augur centralized, uber-national power. And the phrase that's scary most is when he said Britain is being deliberately
Dismantled. Throughout that, what I started to question is where will true opposition voices come from? Are you going to see them come from what used to be regarded as the right parties like reform? Are they going to provide solutions realistically? And I mentioned when introducing this item, the significance of
Do you want to call them online voices, activist voices? I don't even know how to describe figures that seem so modern as Android Tate. Tommy Robinson, I can kind of get a handle on Tommy Robinson. He's the kind of working class activist, the left used to always claim they wanted. And when you do get a working class activist, you might not like what that working class activists
perspectives are and what if you come from loot and what your take is going to be on sort of social dynamics and Islam and multiculturalism and and the areas where Tommy Robinson is often attacked and whatever he's in jail for and I know that it's sort of subsidiary and potentially jeopardizing the trial of people like they're up on travel grooming gangs or and indeed his position in his documentary that Elon Musk has reposted. It seems like
I don't mean so it sounds somewhat irresponsible when you step away from the sort of some of the details around. And you take and tell me robinson which I acknowledge can be kind of troubling in terms of rhetoric and stance and even style. What is it when you talk about someone like.
Starmer, who's like an avatar, a ghost, a kind of phantom politician, the man who's not really there, almost in his voice, you can hear that in that kind of absence of the kind of nasal throaty voice, that there's a kind of an absence at his core.
But what are these kind of somewhat priopic, earthy, occasionally erratic, authentic, difficult figures that are starting to kind of rise up like a new gog-magog while these aisles are being kind of dismantled? I wonder if you can comment on that modern cultural phenomenon and what deeper roots it might have. But also, I wondered if you could cover me because I must have missed this while I was out of the country.
Starmer was like the equivalent of an AG. He was the attorney general. He was the head of the CPS for a long time before he entered into politics. While he was head of the CPS, I'm guessing, because I don't know about the Savalcase, the famous abuse and pedophilia case within the BBC.
Somehow reached the CPS is that what because like that's not a story that I know I'm understanding I knew that posthumously people found out that Jimmy Savile have been abused in an exploit in Children mentally ill people even dead bodies just like the worst story about someone that was a public figure a revolting monster and I even saw kind of attempts when I was
falsely accused of sex crimes, that to a sort of somehow suggest that I'm part of, that I was part of a pantheon with actual terrifying monsters like Jimmy Savile. Now, how did the Jimmy Savile start? Did that actually reach the CPS with the Crown Prosecution Service under starma engaged with that? And was some decision made not to pursue it? It's not something I fully understand. And then off the back of that, can you talk about these other sort of giant figures in the cultural landscape like Robinson and Tate and all that?
When it comes to Kiarstammer, director of public prosecutions, I don't know enough of the legal detail either. He has made an official position where he was in that position
Jimmy Savile's accusations were coming into the system about Jimmy Savile and that it's undeniable that no action was taken against Jimmy Savile while he was alive. The way in which that happened and whether or not Kirstalmer was, whether it came across his desk and he specifically made the declaration that no action should be taken.
I don't know, but the buck stopped here in that famous sense. He was the boss of that entity that was supposed to keep the people safe from people like Jimmy Savile, and he didn't.
You know, that happened on his watch whether or not he was directly responsible for the decisions taken as to whether or not Jimmy Savo should be investigated, accused, tried or anything else. But, you know, it begs the question because we now know that so many people were suspicious of and right up to making allegations about Jimmy Savo for years. It turns out that it was common knowledge
amongst many people that Jimmy Saville was operating in that way. And allegations were being made and, you know, an officialdom was being contacted. And one way or another, you know, the record shows that nothing was done about Jimmy Saville. And he was a friend of royalty. You know, he was chums with Prince Charles, now King Charles, and all of the rest of it. No action was taken.
You know, and it's the truth of all of that has been obfuscated and occulted. You're very difficult to get to it. But it, I mean, it goes away saying that it doesn't reflect well. We know what Jimmy Saville was up to and we know that for decades people were saying, Jimmy Saville is doing the following, what you're going to do about that and no action was taken. It's a desperately, it's a desperately ugly
state of affairs. That's all I can really confidently say about, you know, Keir Starmer and the Jimmy Savile case. He was a dreadful human being and plenty of people were saying he was a dreadful human being and nothing was done to stop. Because I don't even know, like the Jimmy Savile matter was on the desk of the CPS, like, you know, whether the Met have investigated and like, here are CPS
deal with Jimmy Savile, the guys and monster. But what we do know is that Keir Stommel, when he was head of the CPS, had to handle the riots that took place in London and across our country around 2007, where seemingly spontaneously, youths across the nation engaged in these sort of oddly nihilistic, apolitical riots and kind of shop stormings and sort of mass lootins, as it were.
And I remember at the time thinking, this is weird, it's not politicised, but there's a kind of, those sort of started by the murder of Mark Duggan in police custody in North London. At least that was the sort of the tinderbox spark. I remember thinking, this is because there's such a well of dissatisfaction and unhappiness in the country, like it's sort of even nihilistic events are kind of spilling over. Now, Kiyastama, when he was head of the CPS then,
He expedited the trials of those people, handed out harsh sentences, tried minors as adults, kept courts open 24 hours a day, and cases that were meant to be tried in magistrates' courts were tried in crown courts. What I saw that as is a kind of, this is a guy that is authoritarian. That's how he approaches the matter of law. Now if you accompany that with any kind of sort of negligence around serious matters that appear to pertain to
sort of sex rings, pedophilia in the BBC, royal family. Let's face it, David Ike territory once again. Then, you know, it's put simply kind of not a good look. And then when I add to it, like the Julian Assange stuff, you know, he was leader of the opposition and possibly connected to the CPS all the while that Julian Assange was in Belmarsh without trial. Five years there, Julian Assange, let's remember who initially was condemned.
with false allegations of rape when the media started to hunt him down and recognize that some of his contributions to media were threatening. You know, our man, Starmer there, wasn't as literally opposition. Like, listen, I was headed to the CPS. There's no way this dude should be in Belmarsh without trial. What's going on? He's sort of a hero. And if not a hero, he's a journalist. And if he should be in prison, then you can jail journalists anywhere for reporting and not revealing their sources. So like, this sort of mosaic
that appears of Kistama even prior to political power is an indicator of these precisely the kind of leader that you describe someone that can be a vassal for global power. And of course, he famously said, I prefer Davos over Westminster, I think, to Emily Maitis, a BBC reporter. But I can see you're going to add something, mate. There's just something rotten, undeniably rotten, about the establishment.
We can't continue to make this content without the support of our commercial partners. Here's a message from one now.
And her? Oh, that's good. And her. With major advertisers conspiring to pull their dollars, even brands like Dunkin' Donuts turn their back, claiming rumble had a right-wing culture. How dare you say that? I'll never dunk that donut again. Not in my donut, you don't dunk. Not with rhetoric like that. Where's my Cybertruck?
We're not here to fit a mold, we're here to defend free expression. To strengthen this mission, we're excited to offer Rumble Premium a completely ad-free experience with exclusive benefits grow up. For viewers and creators, it's more than a subscription, it's a stand for free speech. Your voice matters. Join Rumble Premium. For a limited time, you can get $10 off an annual plan using the promo code BRAND.
Visit rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash brand and claim your discount today Together we can turn the tide whether you join rumble premium or simply keep watching your support helps keep free speech alive go to rumble.com forward slash premium forward slash brand and use the code brand to get $10 off rumble premium ad-free supports content creators like me plus the additional content you'll get from all of these content creators become a member of rumble premium now use the code brand
I mean, there are so many examples, you know, Cyril Smith, you know, that you can point to Sir Cyril Smith, you know, he was knighted, you know, he was honoured from the, you know, from the highest level. And yet it was, it was a pedophile, you know, there's something rotten, which, you know, I find someone like, imagine Nawaz, for example, very compelling to listen to.
Also, perhaps not quite the same profile as Magid Nawaz, but Dr. Ahmed Mallet, who has come to the fore. Now, both of those individuals are of Pakistan, the origin. Now, Magid Nawaz has been seeing 40 back in the LBC days.
he has been saying that there was something that had to be addressed, that groups of men predominantly of Pakistani origin were raping on an industrial scale up and down the country and had been for decades. You know, and Magidna was, has spoken about that from within that community and was saying,
You know, we have to, we, we, I mean, by we meant, you know, the Pakistani community had to address this. You know, and there is, and more recently, you know, he has been saying that, yes, absolutely undeniably dreadful, dreadful things have been happening. And the groups of men predominantly Pakistani origin have to blame for it. But it's wider than that.
and that it's all part of a larger programme of sowing division. These people were doing these things for 40 years at least, and it was known, and it was being alleged, and whistleblowers were coming forward, and victims were coming forward, and they were being silenced, they were being criminalised, they were being told to go away.
And then all of a sudden, as Magid Nawaz has pointed out, it becomes politically expedient to know publicly, allow these people to be tackled and dealt with, and the whole thing comes up. But Magid Nawaz is amongst, and Ahmed Malik and the rest of them, are saying that there's something much bigger here, much bigger. And then around that, within that, you've got people, you've got figures like Jimmy Savile.
you know, with friends in Buckingham Palace. The whole thing is, there's a rottenness, there's a stink, there's something filthy at the heart of the establishment. And it needs to be, like the arguing stables, it needs to be cleaned out and exposed and all of the rest of it. You know, take a breath there and you know, you mentioned Andrew Tate, you know, Tommy Robinson. These are
Obviously, obviously, in the vacuum, in the void that's left by the establishment being visibly, every sense in the body of the general population can hear, see and smell something rotten. Something rotten all the way through it.
Any action taken is absolutely inadequate and too late and too little.
And into that void, of course, into that vacuum, other personalities are drawn. And for the sake of it, somebody like Tommy Robinson would be a classic example of that. And Tommy Robinson has been around for a long time. And he's been in a long journey. You know, English defense league and all of the rest of it. You know, Neil, you're actually learning his real name. And Tommy Robinson is an assumed name. He's written my book. And he's been on this long journey.
And of course he has drawn people to him because he is articulating a fury. He has become a conduit, a lightning rod, you know, for a fury that's got nowhere else to go. It's not being charged, it's not being asked by the establishment. And so of course it's out there. You know, it's like that kind of, you know, Matthias Desmond, you know, you know, anxiety, this free-floating anxiety that's out there. And someone like Tommy Robinson channels it.
But he's also a divisive figure. It's very interesting to me that...
It's very interesting to me that, you know, in the face of the establishment, a nascent opposition began to form and it's called reform. Now, I can't bear politics. I couldn't be more skeptical about the political system, but nonetheless, something began to coalesce with under the name of, under the umbrella of reform. And it's very interesting to me that
A fisher, a divide has been created there and Elon Musk.
is very much a driving force behind the wedge that has gone into that nascent, populist opposition. Because, you know, Nigel Farage, his leader of reform has been put into position of saying that he doesn't want to sit down with Tommy Robinson. He doesn't want to bring Tommy Robinson into the fold of reform. And so what's that done is split.
a crucial moment that which had been crystallising as some kind of incredible opposition. Who gains from that movement, whatever you want to call it, being split into those that side with Tommy Robinson and those who don't.
What's the game? You've just fractured something that had the potential to form up as some kind of a block. And a wedge has been driven into it. And you think, is that in, you know, in whose interests is that? Now, these characters like, you know, I mean, I don't mean that someone like Tommy Robinson is such a Marmite figure.
You know, people either love him and hold him up as a hero, almost, you know, a messiah for opposition to everything that's rotten in the establishment. Or there's another faction about the same size that don't own anything to do with him. And when I look at all of that happening, I just see, well, it's just division. It's just
All of it is all about creating chaos and creating animosity. And whenever anything even begins to look as if it might be coalescing and crystallizing into something solid, something's thrust into the middle of it that it's just small, ineffectual pieces again.
Well, yes, division among your opposition and divide and conquer are hardly new ideas or terms when it comes to imperial, colonial and in particular British power is a term that was long ago coined to describe the methodology.
of the British establishment in particular. What struck me is interesting, Neil, is twice now when discussing public figures. You've used the idea of vessels or lightning rods or means for conveyance of an ulterior or at least
broader set of principles and ideas. Tommy Robinson, as a kind of lightning rod for rage, kissed armor as a kind of vassal or conduit for a presumably global corporate authoritative power that sort of loosely hangs around organizations like the WHO, W-E-E-F,
NATO and non-profit or non-government organisations that have incredible sway. They need their actors and players and avatars, and also the folk appear to as well, the people, sort of almost summons up characters to carry and convey these difficult sets of sometimes relatively primal forces and primal energy.
What I feel might be being resisted, and I've felt this for some time, is we're beyond the period where there's a requirement for centralized power in the way that there once was, because the centralization of power was necessitated by geographical distance and slow communication. When you have the ability for instantaneous
communication, you also have the ability for decentralised and localised and collectivised power. And in a sense, the politicisation of everything is what creates and contributes to this division. Someone like Andrew Tate, I feel like, you know,
What's an equivalent of Andrew Tate 30 years ago, 40 years ago? Isn't he just a kind of a demonstration of machismo in some way, chauvinism, the will and power of the individual, mouse sexuality? So, Patrick, there's so many sort of words you could wrap around it, but the fact that it's such a hotly political subject and that he's become such a contentious individual is to me an indication of how our culture
thrives precisely on the divisiveness that you're describing, and that there's a kind of a need now if we're going to live in perpetual iconoclasm, where it's not just characters like Andrew Tate, if you screw it in, I should say, well he said this, he did that, or Tommy Robinson, well he said this, or he did that, but in
Indeed, Kistama, well, he said this or he did that. There's not like there's one set of people that if you analyze them to death, wouldn't have skeletons in their closet, so wouldn't be revealed to have had feet of clay. Indeed, this recent spate of revelations and from Trump, the disclosures reveal it appears it's likely to reveal that Martin Luther King, by any reckoning, a great and influential and brilliant man, had more
should we say, marks against him, transgressions, against him flaws in his character, more fallibility than had initially been known or reckoned. And if he was passing through the pipe of contemporary politics and with its accompanying media, he would have been hobbled, knobbled, and discarded much sooner with some of the claims around his private life and his sexuality that have long been discussed, but now appear more vividly and more lucidly
What I'm sort of saying in essence is that we're like, you know, Kiyastama is a pretty broken messed up dude. It looks like if you start to analyze what's going on in his private life or he calls it the shape of his family in a Tommy Robinson's pretty far from perfect. So what it seems to me we need to start organizing are where
Our principles of decentralization, divestment of power, and subsidiarity wherever possible, acknowledging that we're all fallen and broken. And some people, like you said, will turn a Tommy Robinson as a kind of working class savior. And some people will see him as an absolute pariah.
Well, either you're never going to be able to reconcile that and just have massive division with an ongoing advantage given to established and global power, or you're going to have to come to terms with the fact that we need to deploy technology to maximize representative systems of government.
to minimize it. You don't want the government in your bedroom, you don't want the government in your pocket, you sort of don't want the government at all. So there's clearly some sort of reckoning required as to what is the role of government, because whether it's what's going on with Trump and the potential disappointment that you and I discussed for a minute at the beginning, or what's going on with Kistama and the UK and that kind of centralized bureaucracy, what you're sort of confronted with is, well, what I'm confronted with is, do we need government of this scale
Who's benefiting from this stuff? Why are we not being broader, braver, more imaginative with our visions of how we might organize society? I think more and more. I think that as you as you rightly point out, you know, everyone Martin Luther King, whoever, you know, that some of the brick bats that have been leveled at Robert Kennedy Jr., anyone, Andrew Tate,
People are maybe coming to terms with the idea that if you want a perfect hero, you're not going to find them because they just don't exist. But whoever wrote the, you know, I have a dream speech, you know, whoever, if it was him or if it was a collegiate effort or whatever, it was true. It was the truth.
You know, judge people by their character. That's absolutely right. And whether or not he was, you know, had multiple partners or whatever. Yeah, well, yeah. But, you know, let him, you know, judge not let's TV judged. It was still that what he had to see there was the truth.
And what's, I think, you know, a lot of what, you know, Tommy Robinson or David, I, or whoever, have had to say within everything that they've said is true. And you mustn't dismiss 100% of everything that someone says, just because you don't like them. You know, the truth, the truth can appear in the unlikeliest places.
You know, sometimes think about a kind of a pressure cooker analogy, you know, where you've got a sealed pressure cooker with all that steam and heat and pressure building up. And where the steam comes out, where the relief comes, is not the strongest point. It's a little gap. It comes out through a little weakness. And there's something
There's something important about that. The truth can come out through an imperfect person, possibly because they're imperfect, possibly because they have a weakness. That's where the truth comes out, possibly. I mean, I'm only offering that up as a possibility. And just because we see too much of, well, we now see people
You know, for now I see through a glass darkly, but then face to face. On account of social media, the kind of scrutiny that people are under, we do. We do. People are exposed to us, and they're all imperfect. And so what? So what? That doesn't mean that they are not capable. A stopped clock tells the right time twice a day. It's still the truth.
And I think we are, I would like to be beyond a time where we need the very idea of a one-world government, a centralized point making all the decisions and cascading down a one-size-fits-all solution to everything, especially now is anathema.
because we have experienced via technology. We have seen all the stuff about whatever, Blake Lively and what's his name, Reynolds. That whole gossip column thing that's going on, Hollywood celebrity, people are being exposed.
for the frail, imperfect human beings that they are. And, you know, what that ought to inspire is all to think is that, well, these people, be it Donald Trump, be it Robert Kennedy Jr., be it David I, Andrew T, whoever, they're not, you don't look to them for the solutions, and you don't heap their roots onto their shoulders, however broad or narrow, the responsibility for making your life better.
All of it should be gradually nudging us towards that sentence. There it is. As other people have said, it's down to individual responsibility. You know, we have to insist, we have to insist it's our obligation to take responsibility for ourselves and not keep waiting for a hero. The time has passed to look for a knight in shining armour.
We have to take the responsibility for ourselves and it's onerous and it's difficult. And it does come down to accepting that I am as imperfect and weak and flawed and, you know, whatever, skeletons in my closet along with everybody else. You're never going to... Who are these people? Who are these people that are going to emerge from somewhere that are perfect?
that I've never made a mistake, I've never done anything wrong, and I have all the answers. It's infantile to think that we have to do it for ourselves. One hero that we were waiting for, who simply didn't arrive in or out of shining armor, was Laura Logan, who is... Where are you, Laura? Where's Laura Logan when we need her? She never made it, but I think you and I, Neil, did a wonderful job of discussing the subject of RFK's confirmation
whether or not the Trump immediate Trump inauguration is cause for celebration or concern and how Keir Starmer's collapsing globalist experiment reveals a new pantheon, a new architecture, new heroes and new villains, but ultimately Neil's revelation that really personal sovereignty and a connection to the divine is the only way that we're ever going to steward out of what it's
at ourselves for this dark and peculiar time. Neil, thank you for joining us for Oracle's This Week. I hope that you'll be back next week with Laura Logan if she finds her steed, her joust, her helmet, her armour and is able to sweep in and rescue us. I'll be ready when you are Russell. Oh man, thank you. You're so lovely. You were very brilliant today. You were like, I think the more time you're given, the better you get actually.
lovely. And we must then possibly consider wearing slightly different apparel. Well, you're a pertinent surprise to me. I look like something that's been made from the bits left over from making you. I feel the same way myself when I look at that sweep in your incredible hair. Where you've gone with a chief. I carry a knife now around. As a Floridian, I carry a blade about my neck. Neil, thank you so much for joining us today. Thank you all for watching.
and the absent Lara Logan who presumably is I pray safe somewhere in Mexico. We will be back next week with more of the same. Not more of the different. We've got break bread with Wesley Huff coming up on Tuesday on Monday show. I'll be talking to Jeremy Corbell about UFO disclosures. Fascinating subject. We could have talked about that actually. I want to talk about that.
Well, you know, let's talk about it next week. I want to talk about that. We'll talk about it. We'll talk about it next week. I reckon you could do 20 minutes on it. Until next week, remember, if you subscribe to Rumble Premium, you get additional content and an ad-free experience. See you next week, not for more of the same, not with Neil Oliver, but for more of the different, with Laura Logan also. Until then, if you can, stay free.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
Trump in Gaza - a construction project? – SF533

Stay Free with Russell Brand
Trump just announced that the U.S. will take control of Gaza—but what does that even mean? With Neil Oliver and Lara Logan, I break down the shockwaves of this declaration. Is it another off-the-cuff Trumpism, a calculated geopolitical move, or something deeper? We also expose the hidden hand behind USAID—has it been a front for the CIA all along? Plus, my candid conversation with OnlyFans creator Lily Phillips reveals the cultural impact of pornography and its intersection with technology. Don't miss this episode of Stay Free, where nothing is off-limits. Call 1-(800)-958-1000 or visit http://TNUSA.com/brand to schedule a complimentary consultation. Use code BRAND20 at http://takelean.com for 20% off your first order!
February 06, 2025
Gaza Takeover? Trump’s Bold Plan Sparks Global Outrage – SF532

Stay Free with Russell Brand
Trump’s announcement that the U.S. will take ownership of Gaza has sent shockwaves through global politics. In a move that redefines his presidency, Trump, standing beside a visibly stunned Netanyahu, laid out plans that critics are calling imperialism and land theft. The reaction has been fierce, with figures across the spectrum—Glenn Greenwald, Max Blumenthal, and others—condemning the move. How does this fit into Trump’s broader foreign policy, from his tariffs on Mexico to his past comments on Greenland? And what does this mean for Gaza’s displaced population? Thanks to Lumen for sponsoring. To get 20% off go to http://lumen.me/brand and start improving your health today! Protect your privacy with http://www.refugeprivacy.com and use code RUSS to save 10%!
February 05, 2025
Trump’s Trade Wars: Power Plays and Global Repercussions – SF531

Stay Free with Russell Brand
Trump escalates his economic offensive with aggressive tariffs on Mexico, Canada, the EU, and China, using trade as both a bargaining chip and a symbol of nationalist strength. With Mexico agreeing to deploy 10,000 troops to the border in exchange for tariff relief, and Canada scrambling to retaliate, Trump’s strategy raises questions about economic leverage, diplomatic brinkmanship, and whether these moves serve America’s interests or merely reinforce his strongman image Visit http://www.qualialife.com/BRAND to save up to 50% off and if you use code BRAND at checkout you can get an additional 15% off! Find your purpose at Grand Canyon University. Private. Christian. Affordable. Visit http://gcu.edu/russell.
February 04, 2025
UFOs, Whistleblowers, and Government Lies – The Truth with Jeremy Corbell – SF530

Stay Free with Russell Brand
Today, I'm joined by Jeremy Corbell, investigative journalist and filmmaker behind UFO Revolution, to expose the battle over UFO disclosure, military whistleblowers, and the government's control of information. Corbell reveals how Congress manipulated records to erase his role in exposing hidden UAP programs, how whistleblowers have confirmed reverse-engineering of non-human craft, and why a false flag UFO event may be in the works. We explore whether these revelations signal a break in elite control or the next step in mass manipulation, and how UFOs, consciousness, and even biblical prophecy may be intertwined in a reality-shattering shift. Go to http://rumble.com/premium/brand and use code BRAND to save $10 off! Order today at http://www.1775coffee.com/BRAND - code BRAND to save 15% off your order Jeremy Corbell's social links and projects: Website: https://www.extraordinarybeliefs.com Twitter/X: https://twitter.com/JeremyCorbell Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jeremycorbell YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/JeremyCorbell Podcast (Weaponized): https://weaponizedpodcast.com Weaponized on Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/weaponized-with-jeremy-corbell-george-knapp/id1663899066 Weaponized on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/7J5eDqesifFc6onUKuDHz1 TMZ Presents: UFO Revolution (Documentary on Tubi): https://tubitv.com/series/300002259/tmz-presents-ufo-revolution UFO Revolution Season 2 Official Trailer: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfPJ2yYYvOg
February 04, 2025

Ask this episodeAI Anything

Hi! You're chatting with Stay Free with Russell Brand AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history