Raging Moderates: Trump's Immigration Crackdown and the Democrats' Muted Response
en
January 28, 2025
TLDR: Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov analyze Trump's first week back in office, discussing immigration crackdowns, pardons, foreign aid freezes, Democratic opposition shortcomings, and the balance between confrontation and compromise.

In the latest episode of the podcast "Raging Moderates", Scott Galloway and Jessica Tarlov engage in an in-depth discussion of Donald Trump's first week back in office. Covering topics from immigration policies to the Democratic Party's lukewarm reaction, they unpack the implications of his actions and the current political climate. This summary highlights the key insights and core discussions presented in the episode.
Key Themes of the Episode
Trump's Executive Actions
- Immigration Crackdowns: Trump initiated nearly 50 executive orders aimed at reshaping U.S. immigration policies, including significant deportation efforts and a military presence at the Southern border. These actions target birthright citizenship and freeze asylum programs, reflecting a return to aggressive immigration enforcement the country has seen before.
- Chaos and Strategy: Galloway compares Trump’s chaotic strategy to that of “angry teens” pushing boundaries. They discuss whether this approach serves as a calculated branding exercise or simply a reaction to ongoing pressures within his administration.
- Controversial Pardons: Trump's pardoning of January 6th defendants serves as a focal point in their analysis, emphasizing the polarizing atmosphere surrounding these decisions.
Democratic Response and Strategy
- Flat-footed Approach: Tarlov notes the Democratic Party's muted response to Trump's whirlwind actions, suggesting they appear paralyzed in the face of aggressive governance. This contrasts sharply with the proactive and confrontational strategies some argue Democrats should adopt.
- Need for Bipartisan Cooperation: Both hosts contend that rather than merely obstructing Trump, Democrats should assertively defend American values against perceived extremes, suggesting collaboration where possible.
- Crisis of Leadership: Galloway highlights a perceived vacuum of leadership within the Democratic Party, fearing that the current strategy appeases extreme perspectives rather than engaging effectively with broader public concerns.
Public Sentiment and Political Identity
Extremes on Both Sides
- Political Discontent: The podcast addresses frustrations with both major parties, arguing that many Americans feel trapped between extreme ideologies. The assertion is made that moderates are often ostracized for their critical thinking and nuanced stances.
- Emerging Political Dynamics: Tarlov discusses how modern political landscape shifts might redefine what it means to be a “moderate.” People increasingly seek pragmatic solutions rather than adhering strictly to party lines.
Practical Applications for Moderates
- Critical Thinking as a Value: Galloway asserts that moderates should embrace a method of critical thinking that transcends political orthodoxy. Engaging with each issue on its merits rather than resorting to party loyalty can yield better outcomes for citizens.
- Emphasis on Genuine Communication: They stress the importance of regular discourse that does not conform strictly to the ideologies of either side. Authentic engagement with voters and cross-party discussions could pave the way for more effective governance.
Conclusion
In sum, the episode of "Raging Moderates" provokes important dialogues about the current state of political affairs in America, particularly concerning Trump's administration and the Democratic response. It advocates for critical engagement and nuanced political discourse as essential components of a healthier democracy amid rising polarization.
Was this summary helpful?
Nice!
This week on the Gray Area, we're talking to Chris Hayes about how our digital devices have changed us. Now it's like traffic or air travel. Like, it's a thing that we all just experience as a bummer. That you just talk to about like, doesn't it suck that? You know, we can't pay attention. The phones are always going off.
Listen to the gray area with me, Sean Elling. New episodes every Monday, available everywhere. If you're enjoying our content, just a quick ask. Please, right now, hit that subscribe button on YouTube and also hit subscribe and our dedicated raging moderates feed. Jess has two young kids at home. Be supportive. They have to go to college, even though higher ed is such a disaster.
Hit it now. Please help us out. And in exchange, we will do our best. Maybe won't be as moderate as you like, but we promise we'll be very, very. That's right. Now, we'll be both raging and moderate. Please hit the subscribe button. Welcome to Raging Moderate. I'm Scott Galloway. And I'm Jessica Tarlow.
Jess, this is the part of the show where we banter. I'm reading the same note. What would you like to banter about? Well, let's bring this back to me. Show asked me what I did this weekend. What did you do this weekend? How fantastic was it? Well, Jess, I don't like to talk about me or my personal life. But on Saturday morning, I had my 14-year-old just me and him. And so I said, what do you want to do? And I knew it involved something in football. So we jumped on the Eurostar on Saturday morning, which is lovely. Amazing.
Yeah. It takes two hours and 20 minutes. Pancras, or St. Pancras Station is about 10 minutes from where we're living. Two hours and 20 minutes later, we're at the Garda Nourd, which is, I think, train station of North or something in French, just for those of you out there. And then we're at the hotel. We went and had an amazing, our favorite lunch. We had steak freets.
And then we went to the most amazing little stores, mostly chocolatiers and crepe stores. And then we went back and napped and went to the pool. When you have a 14 year old, you got to go to the pool and I've learned that. That's last until high school. No, it's only criteria for hotels is do they have a pool and we always go to the pool. And then we went and then we had a dinner at the most fabulous restaurant at the top of this new
fancy hotel called Cheval Blanc, and we got dressed up, and then we got dressed down, and we went to the PSG Paris Central Mountain football. That's the major team in Paris. Someone's going to say, no, they're not. Ty Renz.
which was a big disappointment for PSG, but we went and saw the football game, came back next morning, woke up, had a lovely breakfast, and then went to Notre Dame, which is spectacular. Oh, it looks amazing. Spectacular, and then cut the US star back. I mean, 24 hours, and just it was one of those incredible weekends with my son. What did you do?
Well, I went to a three-year-old's birthday party on Saturday morning. There was cake, fun, fatty flavor, which is my favorite. Do they rent a place or is it one of those where it's rich people in Tribeca or do they have a rent a place? Well, I think both of those types classify as rich people because if you can rent a place for your toddler's birthday, they did it at their building, actually.
I don't know what they earned, so I can't comment on that. But it was a lovely party. And then Saturday night, we went out to dinner with three other couples, which was very lively. A lot of fun. We're trying out a new babysitter. It seemed to go, OK, the toddler by the end said I liked new babysitter. So great. But it was nice to go out. You know how you usually are out with one other couple? But being out with three other couples,
You know, tons of conversations going on. We had a nice time, but, you know, like home by 930 asleep by 10, the usual. So four couples that usually gives everyone permission to drink more is what I find. And two, there was a lot of drinking and a discussion about how one person thinks that their partner drinks too much, which makes company. That's nice. Yeah, I asked to be excluded from the conversation because also I barely drink.
not. I'm a lightweight and I guess not that fun. And so I'm always very uncomfortable with those conversations. Yeah. So I'll give you a little bit of a heads up on what's coming your way in about seven to 10 years.
You're gonna freak out about the fact that you've spent so much time just raising kids and that you're losing your youth and you and your female friends will start partying like fucking rock stars diagnosed with ass cancer. You're gonna start drinking like crazy. You're gonna start doing girls' trips all the time. You're gonna abuse alcohol. You're gonna experiment with drugs and you're gonna make all the guys' trips that movies have been depicted on seem like a tea party. They talk about the midlife crisis that men have.
I think men's are longer but less severe. The midlife crisis for women happens earlier. Specifically, I think when they leave kind of their birthing years and they're worried they're losing kind of their.
hot girl 20s and 30s, and they go ape shit. So anyways, you got that coming. You got that coming. Oh, well, that sounds like fun. Cause I, yeah, I'm definitely not doing any of that. No, not at this point. Well, it's hard. You know, what are you going to do? I have every once in a while. I have a lot of good friends because I have a second class of Chardonnay. Is that when you? No, I'm not. I have one drink also. I only drink.
Tito's grapefruit and soda. It's like a modified Paloma. Here's another prediction. You're going to start getting unsolicited bottles of Tito's. When I started talking about how much I love sicapa, I'd show up to events and they'd have a bottle of sicapa. So everyone, Tito's
For the lady. Good. Good. All right. Enough of that. Great banter. I loved it. Yeah, that word. Check that box. In today's episode of Raging Moderates, we're discussing Trump's whirlwind first week in office, how Democrats are responding to Trump and what it really means to be a moderate in today's political climate.
Okay, so let's bust right into it. Donald Trump has hit the ground running in his first week back in office, signing nearly 50 executive orders and actions that are already sort of reshaping politics in our country. These include escalating immigration crackdowns with deportation flights in a southern border troop surge, as well as targeting birthright citizenship and freezing asylum programs. On Sunday,
He also got into a feud with the president of Colombia over deportation flights. Meanwhile, he has halted foreign aid worldwide and revoked security clearances from former officials critical of them.
Add to that is controversial pardons of January 6th defendants. The confirmation of cabinet appointments, including Pete Hegsett despite numerous allegations against him and threats to eliminate FEMA while visiting disaster zones, including Hurricane Helene's wreckage in North Carolina and wildfire ravage, California. It's a whirlwind start that is already redefining how America governs, communicates and is viewed globally. Jess, there's a lot to unpack here from Trump's first week. What stood out to you the most?
that there is a lot. That's the point, right? We're so quickly back to where we left Trump 1.0, which is I'm gonna throw everything at the wall and just see what sticks. And it feels as though we have a bunch of angry teens that are in charge of the government, right? Trying everything, pushing boundaries, waiting for someone to slap them on the wrist, push back. Maybe that comes from, you know,
part of the internal caucus. We'll talk about that later on with some of the DEI initiatives that they scaled back, but waiting for the courts to come and get them, hoping that they just can skate through with some of this stuff. I feel there's an overwhelming sense of manufactured chaos to everything and that we are living in the midst of, you would know better than me. If it is, in fact, the biggest branding exercise
in history, but this golden age of America and he has lots of social media spots about it out there on all of his channels, it feels like he's just going full steam ahead with this social media driven approach to governance, loyalty tests,
everything that he left on the table from the first time around, he's picking it up and doing it to the nth degree if he can get away with it. And he's just calling our bluff, right? Just saying, well, come and get me, right? And so that's my, that's my feeling writ large about what's gone on so far. What about you? Yeah, I think that's right. It feels as if one, you could argue this is leadership that he's had kind of four years to prepare for what he would do and just hitting the ground running.
and has decided, okay, I'm gonna, you know, promises made, promises kept, and it's going aggressively at everything you talked about and moving, you know, their fleet of foot, signing executive orders on the dais. So you could argue it's leadership. I like what you said, the world's largest branding event. I hadn't thought of it that way. I think that's really interesting.
At the same time, you're sort of flooding the zone, which is so much shit or actions that wouldn't have flown before. And one of the things about our government, the reason why we have three branches is it's meant to have this wonderful intransigence where we sometimes, to a fault, wrestle stuff to the ground and really examine it. And there's just none of that now. I would give more points to the Trump administration than I would give to the Democratic Party right now who appears to be just caught flat footed.
in this mix of can you believe this shit we don't know what to do and trying to sign up for this PBS hallmark channel bullshit of we need to come together we need to cooperate with the president they're all trying to they're all set in such shock about this win and you know while it was a small number of votes even kind of seven for seven in swing states are all trying to pretend to be more moderate
and say i'll work with the president and they don't want to come right out of the box shit posting i think that's a failed strategy i think they wanted war i think we should have it um i'm not up for normalizing an insurrectionist and a rapist so i guess that doesn't make me a moderate because i won't sign up to this great we'll just end the podcast right now but i i would argue that there's this we have this sort of notion it's time to come together
I don't agree. I think Democrats and moderate Republicans need to come to the rescue. I think some of this stuff is just so over the line and so on American, you know, rescinding the security detail of people who he doesn't like.
with live Iranian threats to their, I mean, to their lives. I mean, if you have Tom Cotton, maybe the hero in all of this, which is frightening to me, but well, he wants a security detail. He's out of office.
Well, he definitely wants one on January 6th. Oh, that was Josh Hawley. Um, it was running away like a little girl, no offense to little girls. Um, some of it is just petty. Some of it is the revenge tour. Some of it, I do think is rooted in a genuine ideology, but then it's always taken one step further. And I've been thinking about this notion of what is the kernel of truth that gets us to the crazy place that we've ended up.
Right. Because a lot of what's going on right now, I believe is Democrats fault. Right. Like we walked into very specific traps. And so we ended up with people telling us, essentially, I want a bloodless revolution. Right. I want the establishment so far away that I can't even see Nancy Pelosi. All of this makes me sick. And I would rather take a flyer on the chaos agent than have someone
who is routine and boring and also is afraid to say things that are common sense, like the thing that's right in front of you. So if we look at with the DEI revolution that's going on now, that comes from
You know, after the murder of George Floyd that companies just added, you know, 50 to 100 DEI employees there. It was crazy. I was looking at data from Loudoun County, Virginia. They have a DEI office that they're spending enough on it that they could hire 125 new teachers.
if they took that money and did that. Obviously, a parent in that district is going to say I would rather have new teachers than have dozens of employees in the DEI office. For instance, on the trans issue, we talk about this regularly. If you're going to say that Leah, it's fine for Leah Thomas to compete at the collegiate level, people are going to think that you are insane on trans issues and then they're going to pick someone who's going to overcorrect and take away protections for trans people. On immigration, if you're going to say the border is secure,
People are going to look at you like you're a lunatic, especially once migrants are getting bust to northeastern liberal cities and they're understanding the implications of how El Paso, Texas has been living. And we're going to have the overcorrection and we're going to see stuff like this.
I don't even want to call it a rise in deportations. I find it fascinating and this goes to the social media presidency or just who has the best branding exercise of this because they're out there saying, promises made, promises kept, we deported 310 undocumented people or illegals, they would say, I would say undocumented because I'm polite.
Biden was deporting, sometimes it got over 400 people per day. I think on average, he was at 310 per day. But the Democrats never talked about anything that they were doing. And that's the difference in this. If you leave people in the dark about what your administration is actually doing, and I'm talking about the stuff that matters to them, not the stuff that feels ancillary or for show,
they're going to pick the other person. And now people are running around saying, oh, well, Donald Trump is the toughest on immigration. No, actually Barack Obama was the toughest on immigration. And we have been deporting a lot of people. People don't know that border crossings are down 55% at the end of the Biden administration after obviously huge surge in the beginning. So we need a new digital strategist. That's for sure.
the next time around that we do this. And I don't know, have you listened to any of Chris Hayes' interviews about his new book about attention and the attention economy? Oh, that's a new term, attention economy. Let me think. I started using that about 15 fucking years ago. Anyways, what did Chris Hayes said? He's discovered the attention economy? What is Chris after that? No, he didn't. No.
He didn't discover it, but he was talking about it in context of recent outcomes and this race just to be the first person to say something that someone sees on their phone and how meaningful that is for that. And I cannot think of an instance where Democrats were the first people to be able to say something. It's always the Republicans. It's usually, it's Trump. Well, just starting there. So first off, I would like to see what committee would have been.
We need immediately, in my opinion, to get probably not musk because I think it would be too much of a spectacle and just bring him more power. It's like one of those villains in a comic book that the more you throw shit out of it, he absorbs it and becomes more.
powerful, but the Commerce Science and Transportation Committee, in my opinion, have hearings in the tech industry's influence on democracy and its elections, because there I think is now emerging evidence that basically Musk and Yakareno weaponized Twitter, including creating thousands and thousands of accounts,
to elevate misinformation and it essentially spread just a ton of propaganda misinformation that had a real impact on the election. I'm not sure it's illegal. It's a private company. He can do what he wants with it. But I want her up there to under oath to say, yeah, I knew that he was creating thousands of bots pretending to be humans. And we were elevating information or lies, even though we knew they were lies,
such that it would influence the outcome of the election. I just want her to go on records saying that so Americans know what they're dealing with. And they have very effectively, even if it's Umberta Echo, the Italian philosopher said,
along the lines of the attention economy, that it's not what you're famous for, it's just about being famous. So say something incendiary and as long as you're dominating the news cycle, I feel like Republicans are dominating 90% of the news cycle right now. And unfortunately, we have Senator Schumer who brightens up a room by leaving it, just kind of doing nothing or saying nothing. We have Speaker Emerita Pelosi who just purchased $50,000 to $100,000 with a call options
on Tempest AI, and when that was disclosed, the company had its best one-day performance in history at 35%, so she's spending more time on Robinhood engaging with its effectively insider trading than actually paying attention to real issues. My question is, where the fucking Democrats? I don't agree with a lot of AOCs policies, but at least she's out there. At least she's trying to push back. Where is Senator Klobuchar talking about
you know, antitrust and competition and inflation and talking about how the tenure is surging and that these policies are incredibly inflationary, we have, we're literally fighting fire with fucking squirt guns. And when I say squirt guns, I mean, senior leadership and the Democratic Party that is too old, too tame, thinks they're in a PBS drama where they, good sir, and they like hit them with their glove.
I mean, enough already that this is insane that we don't have. I want to see hearings on let's immediately have a hearing on this new crypto AI community. And first thing is we need them to come this committee organized by the president. We should have the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing that investigate legal implications of Trump's meme coins. I want and bring the new head of this AI and crypto community to explain
the Trump and Melania coin. Let's have him go on the record and say, what is this and is it good for the economy? And we'll be able to invite dozens of the 60,000 people who bought this coin and are now off 70 or 80% about 72 hours. Instead, we just sort of sit there and give this bullshit. Let's time to come together. There's things we can work on together. Work on together. We had an immigration bill.
that the president basically from Mar-a-Lago killed, so he could take credit for it. And we're all sitting around thinking, it reminds me of the movie The Mission. I don't know if you saw that movie with Robert De Niro and Jeremy Irons. But Jeremy Irons plays this, I don't know, called Priest, a religious figure. And the British are coming basically to slaughter this indigenous community.
I don't know if it's Argentinian or Brazilian. They're missionaries. Anyways, and the priest, Robert De Niro is trying to get everyone they know they're coming to prepare for war, and the priest says we're about non-violence, and they're slaughtered, of course. I just watched a movie called 24, which was about the most famous Norwegian spy of all things, and a woman stands up as he's speaking to this university saying, why didn't you try non-violence?
I feel like the Democrats have decided to try non-violence. And I'm like Cersei, I choose violence. This is not working. Sitting around trying to pretend we're taking the higher ground and we're going to work with the president.
It hasn't worked, folks. We need to be calling balls and strikes here and saying that this is when you have the president saying things like polluting blood, and then you have the person who, in my opinion, weaponized a platform to get him elected telling the far right party in Germany, you shouldn't dilute your culture. I mean, this is pre-Hitler shit.
And yet I don't see a single Democrat with anything resembling a following of social media out there saying fuck all. So yeah, we right right now, as far as I can tell, we have one party and another party that thinks they're a cotillion training their kids to be polite and that peace and love will win out. Thank you for my TED talk. Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us.
Support for the show comes from Vanta. Trust isn't just earned, it's demanded. Whether you're a startup founder navigating your first audit or a seasoned security professional scaling or GRC program, proving your commitment to security has never been more critical or more complex. That's where Vanta comes in. Businesses use Vanta to establish trust by automating compliance needs across over 35 frameworks, including SOC 2 and ISO 27001.
They also centralized security workflows complete questionnaires up to five times faster and proactively manage vendor risk. Vanta not only saves you time, it can also save you money. A new IDC white paper found that Vanta customers achieve $535,000 per year in benefits and the platform pays for itself in just three months.
Join over 9,000 global companies, including Atlassian, Quora, and Factory, who use Vanta to manage risk and prove security in real time. For a limited time, our audiences get $1,000 off Vanta at vanta.com slash prop G. That's V-A-N-T-A dot com slash prop G for $1,000 off.
So a couple of things. Democrats said all the stuff that you just said before the election for months, and voters turned up and said, I don't care. Right. So I care. Millions of people do care, but the pivotal number that 7 million people who voted for Biden in 2020 sat home in 2024. That's how little they cared about what you're just talking about.
AOC is out there. She posted before the inauguration, you know, people are asking me why I'm not going to inauguration. And I'm not going to the inauguration of a rapist to use the term that you use, though I know there's a legal conversation about that. And I'm not looking to have a defamation suit.
So AOC is staying stuff like that. She was on John Stuart's podcast talking a lot like you were just now. But I feel like for someone like Hakeem Jefferies, who is a very unifying leader, he is trying to figure out as Nancy Pelosi had to for years.
how to manage a caucus that is being pulled in many different directions, because the difference between what goes on for a safe seat Democrat and a swing seat Democrat is like night and day. And we're going to have Congressman Tom Swazzy on for an interview later in the week talk to him about this as he's from a swing district. And he was one of the first people out there saying, these are the issues I'll be able to compromise on. We got to work together like the Lake and Riley Act for immigration.
And I'm definitely looking forward to pushing him about the parts of that bill that are definitely not good, right, in terms of not projecting dreamers and minors. But obviously.
you can affect any change if you're not in office. And if these people want to continue to be reelected so they can even make incremental progress, they're going to have to work with the other side to some degree. It's something like 83% of the American public wants the two sides to work together. And that's why I think going back to the executive orders and kind of the beginnings of this, it is important to look at
the list of things and to say this is stuff that I kind of understand, right? Like if you want to call it a national emergency on the southern border, if you want to put more resources down there, I can get on board with that. I completely understand it. All the people who live along the border would tell you that's exactly the kind of conditions that they're living in. But the stuff that
you have to figure out a way to effectively hold the line, not just rail about it or post about it. He's basically undoing the entire asylum system. I was watching Tom Holman, he was being interviewed about what happens now to all the people who had their Customs and Border Patrol appointments canceled because they got rid of the CBP 1 app, and he said, well, go to a port of entry.
The whole point was that you don't want people showing up at Port of Entries. I mean, there are tens of thousands of people who have been waiting in Mexico, some upwards of a year, to do this the legal way. Also completely forgetting the fact that people who are here illegally do have rights. That is enshrined in our Constitution, that they have a right to legal counsel, that they have a right to do process. And the DOJ has new directives. This is one that
I thought this can't be real, where they're now telling legal service providers who get federal funding not to do their jobs, not to help these immigrants that are here who might have a completely legitimate asylum claim. I already mentioned
the DEI offices in the Fairfax County. Sorry, I said Loudon County before it's Fairfax County. So that's obviously bad, but then you sprint ahead. Did you see this? That the Department of Defense, because they took down all of their DEI stuff, removed promotional video material about the Tuskegee airmen. Yeah, and women in World War II.
Uh, yeah, the wasps, which is such a great name for it. And it was Katie Britt from, at the center of, from Alabama who tweeted, Oh, this must be a mistake. And within a couple of hours, the new defense secretary, Pete Haggs, that was like, you know, I've fixed it. But that feels like one of those circumstances where they were trying it on, right? They thought, well, we could just go ahead and get rid of these things. And if someone catches us, so what, you know, we'll put it back up.
And we're in the news, we're on a big challenge. And we're dominating the cycle, no matter what, because all news is good news or all press is good press, I guess. And that's a credo that Trump has lived by forever. There's also just such a lack of expertise and willingness to want to do the work. They want to eliminate things en masse and not spend the time going through and actually looking at what the relevance is.
purging the government of any of those checks. They got rid of, I think, 17 inspector generals over 12 huge bureaucracies, right? These are things that used to piss off storied members of the Senate. Chuck Grassley lost his mind in 2021. Trump got rid of two IGs. Now 17 have been removed. Did you see this communication freeze for the NIH and the CDC, like in the midst of bird flu?
They can't tell people what's going on with something. Yeah, exactly. Um, and the foreign aid freeze is just totally frightening. And we're driving the World Health Organization to your point about sticking our chin out. You know, I believe Biden's first executive order had to do with transgender athlete athletes rights and it took them three years for an executive order on immigration to your point.
illegal border crossings had dropped to about 45,000 in December of 2024. But in December of 2023, a quarter of a million people came across the border illegally. What I find sort of ironic and telling about these, I don't know what the term is, roundups or, you know, when the ice shows up, they've decided the most efficient place to quote unquote, find these unproductive people who are freeloading. Is it workplaces? Right. I thought, so if you wanted to deport
Americans, you're probably going to McDonald's or to their basements where video games are. But with undocumented workers, you go to places of work because that's where they are. I thought that was sort of ironic. But we had this coming. We ignored the problem. It got out of control. And just as you can never actually visually spot a pendulum at the middle, they have swung. They have taken advantage of this and they swam back. And quite frankly, I don't have a problem.
with deportations of undocumented workers. But let's start with those who are in prison. Let's start with those who've now committed two crimes, one crime coming over here, legal, the second one. I think that's absolutely
fair game. The, I mean, some of the other issues that we really screwed up on, we talked about transgender, we took just a, I don't want to say irrelevant, but an issue and gave them just a free gift would purchase for parents all over the nation who don't want to have their daughters kind of run over. The macro, the biggest issue, hands down in my opinion, is that a mix of identity politics
Weaponization by special interest groups essentially had the Democrats implicitly and explicitly turn their backs on the group that has struggled the most the last 40 years. Everybody feels when young people aren't doing well. They're parents, society, and these are the people on social media saying, okay, great, NVIDIA's worth $3 trillion. I can't afford rent. So instead of focusing on policies like inflation, how to build more houses, bring down costs,
lower enrollment instead of being weaponized by these universities that are, I mean, essentially some of the most corrupt organizations in the world are seen as the center of democratic politics, specifically my industry. What is more of an epicenter of democratic ideals than elite institutions?
who I just interviewed the president Dartmouth. They have an $8 billion endowment and 11,500 kids. Okay, excuse me? You're not this elite cast enforcer talking about big, fancy ideals, but you don't want to, you don't want to give people this drug that decreases obesity, anxiety, gives them a shot at getting married, making money. No, you'd rather hoard it just for you and your elite friends. So let's create a misdirect of DEI. You know, Michigan has 200 DEI officers.
60% of Harvard's freshman class identifies as non-white, but we need to have DEI on campuses so that we can discriminate against what white kids from rural states.
I mean, we got so out of control with the identity politics, the DEI apparatus, not focusing on inflation, not focusing on young people, that we just gave them a layup to become sort of, you know, just go overboard, flood the zone with a ton of shit. I get it, we deserve it, we had it coming. What I'm really disappointed about is why we're all taking it and calling on people to work together. As far as I'm concerned,
It used to be about a certain level of mutual respect. Democrats and Republicans at the end of the day thought, well, if they get in power, I want them to show me some mutual respect. It seems to me like we need to move to mutual destruction and say, look, Marjorie Taylor Greene and Stephen Miller, if you want to start revoking security details, just be careful what you ask for. Because once you're out of office, my guess is you're going to be real fond of a security detail. If you want
I mean, if you want us to stick the DOJ on you after our guy gets in office, but right now we're giving them the impression that if you hit us, we're Gandhi and we believe that peace is going to work here. And I think it's to our disadvantage. I think we come across as total wimps and there's no incentive.
for them to say, well, maybe we shouldn't be cutting the security detail of General Milley in case our generals that we like are under threat after they leave office. I don't think there's any sense that we'll ever hit back, so to speak, your thoughts.
Yeah, to back up your point that I think it's crazy that we had his whole transition, knowing exactly who he is, what he's going to do. He's telegraphing it every day and that we showed up on January 20th at inauguration and did not have a solid message or a plan for countering this. The Democrats response post inauguration or the complexion, I would, for me, define the term flat footed.
just on our heels respond, not even responding, just kind of paralyzed, just incredibly encephalatic and not counter punching at all. It feels to me like in terms of the viscosity or strength of the Democratic Party right now, we have, I've never seen this this week.
That's a major declaration. I don't know if it's necessarily wrong. I think the right attitude like Congressman Golden's team has said, we're not going to respond to everything that Trump does because you can't live in the midst of an outrage cycle constantly. But if we just take it on the chin constantly, I could see voters showing up again in 2026 and just saying, well, what are you about? I still have absolutely no idea. So how can Jeffries really wants to focus in on cost of living issues?
And the Republicans have put forward all these EOs and they have a bill about banning transgender people from athletics, but they don't have a cost of living bill and JD Vance was on with March Brennan over the weekend and said, well, it takes time to bring prices down. When they had told us it would happen on day one. So I think you have to keep hammering that, but you also need to have a personality and be able to go on a long form podcast and chill with people and talk about other things besides politics. And I'm not seeing that.
from that many key players in the Democratic Party. Most people, myself included, thought Biden went too far with his preemptive pardons, but he may be vindicated in that, in the long term, that these are ruthless people.
who have said in public forums that they're going to come after these folks and that that was actually the right thing to do. I mean, that's a Mitch McConnell move, right? It's not a traditional Joe Biden move to go for the absolute worst case scenario.
I hope that if Cash Patel gets confirmed and it looks like he will, because it looks like everybody will, maybe not Tulsi, that he isn't as punitive and as motivated by retribution as he details in his book. But who knows? And I wanted to add to what you're saying about young people. I was talking to a friend of mine
whose brother is 30 years old, went on a bachelor party, 13 guys, 10 of 13 voted for Trump. And these were all liberal-minded guys that went to university together. And what we were discussing that I found so interesting, and it links also to the discussion about what's going on with higher education, is that we just are seeing now amongst young people a new definition of what sounds smart.
So it used to be, you know, all of your degrees, your level of credibility was directly connected to how fancy the school you went to was, right? Like what kind of job you had, you know, how that you knew which fork went with which, right? Like going back to the pretty woman scene, right? Slippery little suckers, right? Like that that was what low class looked like and high class looks like someone who dedicates their life to public service, but also has a trust fund that they're relying on and went to Harvard for everything.
And now the people that are revered, or that folks think are smart, are the ones who are asking questions incessantly. And it doesn't matter what they're questioning. Like are of Cajun, well I'm just asking questions, right, about the measles vaccine, or florid in the water, or whatever it is that day. And the right has
weaponize that against us to an incredible advantage because all of these young people who are smart and very well educated now think that it is cool and forward thinking and what they want to see in leadership for people to not actually know the answers to questions. And I don't know how you rectify that.
Because, you know, I talk to my toddler and she's asking questions all the time, right? Like, but why mom? Mommy, why? Why do we do this? Why are you going here? Why do I have to brush my teeth? Why do I have to make my bed? And then you fast forward to where she'll be in 25, 30 years. Let's say, is she going to say Joe Rogan is the smartest person in the world because he's just asking questions? I mean, even less freedmen.
someone is a very traditionally smart person, right, in terms of education and productivity is just asking questions, like asking Zelensky, why don't you just give up your country? And that's what passes now as the folks that we should be looking up to. And that's leading to a set of government officials who are also doing that same thing who are just flooding the zone with wild questions that then leave them with this
route that they can go through to throw all of this administrative shit at the wall. And we're ending up with a government that I'm sure will be in complete crisis in a matter of months.
Yeah, it's definitely, I mean, we say this a bunch that were sort of in uncharted territory. It seemed like I'm just, you said something that sort of, I don't know, piqued my interest because you know more about this than I do, but that you believe Cash Patel will be confirmed and that there's a chance that Tulsi Gabbard won't be. And I would have reversed that, but I don't know the latest. What's going on there?
What, well, what's going on is, I mean, you saw the excess go through, so there were three no votes on that. It was quite clear that Senator Tillis did want to vote against him because he required a excess to write a letter to him answering specific questions about
accusations of abuse against his second wife. There was a big New York Times piece about this. And you can see even on Joni Ernst's face that she didn't want to do this. But when you're threatened with a primary and probably with violence, knowing how the internet works, you do those things. The reason that I say that I think it's possible Tulsi doesn't get confirmed Lindsey Graham over the weekend wouldn't answer. Right. And how he was voting on it. And I feel like if there is anyone
who's not going to get through. It's the one that people are being the quietest about. And no one really talks about Tulsi Gabbard. They're talking about the other ones. I think it's feasible that Republicans decide that RFK Jr is not actually a threat to vaccines or whatever and let him through. But it seems like they're advertising having good meetings with Cash Patel. And I haven't seen one thumbs up MAGA post with people standing with Tulsi Gabbard.
But I'm prepared for all of it together. I love someone said that Mitch McConnell voting against Haggseth would be like Hannibal Lecter going vegetarian on his deathbed. It's just like don't don't don't hold your breath. But yeah, it's it's yeah. Again, he, you know, he's got very little to lose at this point, right? He's totally he's leaving. He's old. I mean,
Profiles encourage though, right, that you're doing it and then nothing really to show for it, but you know, I guess I appreciate it anyway.
But you think Cash Patel is going to get through? That's super interesting. Right now. I don't know. Who knows? But it looks likely. And people seem to be thinking that Donald Trump is entitled to whatever he wants in terms of a cabinet. And usually people do get what they want. There have been cases where it hasn't happened.
They strong arm everyone and they have this fleet of people online just threatening anyone who opposes them, including, you know, members of their family will do things like that, whether that is a sitting elected representative or the president of another country, like this game that went on with the Colombians.
about using military planes versus the regular detention planes. I mean, first of all, costs three times more. They can get up to $852,000 to send back migrants on these C-130s, I think, or C-17s.
It's all about branding, right? So it's just like a huge, right? It's all the show and CNN was reporting this morning that they want all of the ICE agents to be wearing their vests. And for this to be made for TV, because we're in the Truman show, but like a really bad version. Okay, let's take a quick break. Stay with us.
Support for Prophecy comes from Nutriful. Hair is incredibly personal. Every man out there has his own relationship to his hair journey. Maybe you embrace the bald when you notice things thinning up top. I support you. I think that's a wonderful decision. But if you're not quite ready to say goodbye,
by to your shedding, thinning locks. You might want to check out Neutrophil. Neutrophil is the number one dermatologist recommended hair growth supplement brand and it's been trusted by over 1 million people. You may see thicker, stronger, faster growing hair with less shedding and just three to six months with Neutrophil. Its physician formulated to target the common causes of thinning hair including stress, lifestyle, hormones, aging and more.
If you've been waiting for a convenient and effective way to care for your hair, Neutrophil is a great place to start. You can start your hair growth journey now with Neutrophil. For a limited time, Neutrophil is offering our listeners $10 off your first month subscription and free shipping when you go to Neutrophil.com and enter the promo code
PropG. Find out why over 4,500 health care professionals and stylists recommend Neutrophil for healthier hair. Neutrophil.com spelled N-U-T-R-A-F-O-L dot com promo code PropG. That's Neutrophil dot com promo code PropG.
Welcome back. Before we wrap, we got to address something we've been hearing from some of you. Apparently, there's a feeling that we're not quite living up to that moderate in our show name. Maybe we're leaning a bit more into the raging side. People say we're more raging than moderate. That's a fair point.
So what does being a moderate really mean to us, especially during this new administration? Jess, you kick us off. What do you think it means to be a moderate? Well, first, the fact that we're talking about this is your fault because you made me a comments monster. And I went and looked at what people were saying. And there's a lot of positive stuff. But don't look at the comments. I mean, read the first five, learn from it, and then ignore it. Just your own mental health.
I stay up later than everyone in my household, so I could spend a good amount of time comments doom scrolling. But seeing a lot of this, like, this is not what a moderate means. And I am completely willing to accept that a moderate means different things to different people. And that also, I think of myself as a liberal moderate.
not someone who is a swing voter at this point. And most people who advertise that are lying because there's usually a crucial issue that puts you into one camp or the other. For a lot of people, it's whether you're pro choice or pro life. And as a pro choice person, I would be hard pressed to support a candidate that was pro life.
But I guess I wanted to talk about this because I think what we share and why we wanted to do this specific podcast together under this name is because we want to talk about politics through the framework of pragmatism, not just optimism or what we want to happen.
and that it's important to have political discussions that are cognizant of the guardrails of the way government actually operates. And also, I think most crucially understanding that the framework of a partisan worldview is not how the general populace operates. And the 2020 for results were so indicative of that transformation that people are not interested in backing a team in the same way, if anything, they're backing Trump because they backed that player.
Right. Like that's their favorite football player or their favorite basketball player or whatever sport they're into. And.
I think that being a moderate right now is trying as per our earlier discussion to see the good in what the other side may be bringing to the table and saying like, sure, that works for me. And also I have constituents or I have people that I know who absolutely feel that way, recognizing the faults of the party that we both belong to and then trying to find a way to constructively and effectively push back
Where we need to and that that's how that's how i see it right now and how do you see it well i even i use that earlier you're not moderate so, the podcast is over i would define myself with the is ground so is kind of ground zero for moderate so that is what i can tell moderates are basically people that everybody hates.
And essentially, I mean, the generous or the actual Webster definition would be someone who has tempered views and is somewhere in the middle on the political spectrum.
And the way I see it is I've tried as I've gotten older to not be lazy and sign up for any political orthodoxy. When I hear something crazy on the left, I like to call it out. When I think our democratic leadership is too inefficient, feckless, cowardly, I call it out. When I think DI is out of control, when I think that immigration is out of control, when I think that social security spending is out of control, you know, there's some of their favorite policies on the left, I call it out.
And when I am, you know, I'm vigorously pro-Israel. It's like, I don't bark up any one tree. I try to have my own views. In this environment, based on where the political spectrum is, I'm now seeing a center left. In the 70s, I would have been a Rockefeller Republican. That just would have been, I would have been in that party. But I think it's also just saying, look, I'm gonna look at, I'm gonna be a critical thinker. I'm gonna look at issue by issue.
And regardless of the political orthodoxy you're supposed to sign up to, you say, okay, I'm not down with this. And it's almost like you become, unfortunately, to a certain extent, the left is much harsher on moderates. They treat you like an apostate. Yeah, Scott, I thought we could trust you. People from the Biden campaign, sign up. Don't you understand the assignment? Sign up? Well, no, he's too fucking old. What are we doing here?
And then people on the right are just like kind of write you off as a libtard. But they don't come after you the same way the left does when they thought you were quote unquote, when we thought you were one of us.
So I see a moderate as someone who says, OK, I'm going to go issue by issue. I'm going to use critical thinking. I'm going to be unafraid to say, this makes no sense, regardless of the cult dynamics of pressure to sign up for the full orthodoxy and narrative. Because when the narrative gets crazy or makes no fucking sense, you say, OK, I don't buy this. I don't have a problem with the porting criminals. I get the symbolism of it. I don't have a problem with the surge of troops.
at the border, fine, um, deficits, you know, anyways, my point is I'd like to think of moderate as someone who says, I'm a critical thinker. I'm going to look at the issues and I'm going to decide one by one what I think is the right view on this. I'm not going to sign up and just say, okay, I'm a fan. I'm a cultist, no matter what they say. And this is true about the left and the right, but I will say as someone who's seen or identified as a Democrat that I get more hate
from the left, then I do from the right. The right is just kind of written me off. And that's how it is in our society. You got to pick a side. You can't say, well, I want to go issue by issue, right? Do I believe women should have the right to terminate a pregnancy? Yes. In the third trimester? Okay, that's worth a discussion, right? If the woman's health or the baby's health is not,
in danger. At the same time, nobody trusts each other. So nobody wants to have anything resembling kind of a moderate conversation. In addition with Citizens United and gerrymandering that has hard right and hard left districts, there's no political room for moderates anymore. They can't get elected.
right? Because basically every election now with this hard blue and hard red districts is decided in the primary. So it's basically who can be craziest, who can be more crazy left, or who can be more crazy right? And it's moderate is just a recipe for not getting elected. So I think in the media, or as a commentator, or whatever you want to call yourself a thought leader, I think it's especially important that we demonstrate it's okay to be a critical thinker and occasionally have
your followers on threads or blue sky come after you because you say, yeah, I don't get this democratic policy. I think the vice president was a great senator. I think she may have a great Supreme Court justice. I don't know if she'd be a great president and then everyone comes for you. And I'm not willing to sign up and blind, bend the knee for see above an insurrectionist and a rapist.
critical thinking, look at every person, look at every issue and decide where you are on it. That's my story. I'm sticking to it, Jess. No, I think that's the right story. And I think that there's so much pressure to always be a good soldier. I certainly feel this in my role, being part of the conservative media ecosystem, that there are liberals who get enraged if I even say, well, this doesn't make a ton of sense. Or this is an issue that 70% of Americans agree on.
like, why can't that just be our position? It seems pretty normal. Like, you know, the was a prop 36 on the California ballot, making it not okay to shoplift up to $950 without getting arrested. Like, these are just obvious things.
and you should be able to have opinions about them without people flipping out on you. But I do think a critical component of how we approach politics and how people who are governing more in the middle do is that they fundamentally understand that
It's not the intentions that matter. It's the outcomes that matter. And we just had an enormous outcomes election where people said that governance in blue cities and states.
was not meaning the moment, far from it, that riding the subway is not a good option anymore, that we don't support law enforcement, that we have people who are incompetent, perhaps corrupt in big positions of power, and that we are not living up to the covenant.
that our elected officials make with the people who send them there and that we're actually failing ourselves when it comes to our values because of how poor that governance has gotten. And that's really crucial to how I think about politics and how I think about my advocacy for policies that I think will improve quality of life. And more often than not,
Those policies are linked to more liberal legislators or people who see the world through a similar prism to me. But I am completely open to the fact that there are good representatives from the other side of the aisle that also live by those ideals or certainly can meet us somewhere in the middle to get something good done. And I remember when
the Democrats were funding MAGA candidates to run against moderate Republicans. And I understood it from a, you know, we got to win perspective, but.
It was upsetting to me that good people like Peter Mayer in Michigan lost his seat because we put in tons of money to back a crazy person that would then go on to lose to the Democrat. And I think that those are the kinds of things that we need to explore because we're only going to have a healthy political system if we do have
to thriving parties that are full of people that actually capture the cultural and political zeitgeist of the country. And the extremes on both sides are wildly dangerous. I think that the right, more dangerous than the left. But when you look at what people
think and how they're talking about the issues. You know that the Marjorie Taylor Greens of the world are not appealing to the general population writ large. And that first sound like the Elano Mars or the Rashida Talibs of the world are not appealing to them either. And so I think
It's important to be trying to stake out ground to have these discussions about it to, you know, bring people on from the other side of the aisle or people who work regularly with Republicans so that we can hear about how progress can actually be made because they're the ones we can talk all we want from our studios. But they're the ones actually casting the votes for all of this and hopefully making a big difference in people's lives.
Yeah, something I think the Republicans have done much better than Democrats and your buddy Tim Miller, I thought made a great point on from the Voler podcast. They kind of a coarseness and the
You know, just the provocative, sometimes stupid, sometimes weirdness that's come out of the right. It came across as authentic. Whereas Democrats, it's as if they're reading off a press release or believed that they're crossing the Delaware or giving an inauguration speech. I mean, they're just so like, it's like, speak like a regular person for God's sakes. And the Republicans do that better.
than Democrats. Also, it strikes me that a big component in terms of what impacts people's lives and gives them the impression of the respect of brands, we have to get our shit together around on the ground running some of these democratic cities. A bunch of my friends lost houses in the Pacific Palisades, and they basically all said the same thing. They're like,
I keep hearing these excuses for the reservoirs weren't full, the water pressure was down, whatever it is. And he's like, we pay 13% a year in additional taxes. If I'm going to have my house burned down, I'll move to Florida or Texas where I pay 0%. It's like, we should have the supersized gold plated VIP, you know, a white glove government when you're paying 13%. And instead some of the highest tax
highest tax states are offering, I mean, they're expensive, but bad, which isn't a recipe for a good product. And the most expensive, but bad metrics right now are governed by Democrats who seem to be weaponized by unions or whatever it might be, special interest groups, and are just taxing the shit out of their local residents and doing head up your ass, you know, enforcement like you're talking about where if you steal less than $900, they don't even prosecute you.
So I think until, and by the way, I think, I don't think that's true of New York. New York has 12, I think it's a total of about 12 or 13% also in taxes, but I would argue Manhattan is worth it. I think it's actually, I think Manhattan is well run. And I don't know about you, but I do feel, I do feel that the subway feels a little bit different. I've noticed that, but more aware. That's an understatement. Yeah, you really feel it, don't ya?
Well, I do personally, but I don't remember I grew up here and have ridden this that way in my whole life, the number of people being like thrown in front of cars, being punched, slashed, a woman burned on the F train. That's, that's not normal. Oh, things happen every once in a while. I agree. And Kathy Hockle's definitely getting the message because of Richie Torres, but it's bad. Yeah. And also I just, in terms of crime,
I think it's. The crime is down, but those are also to the point about the messaging of this. No one, if they feel less safe and you come at them with a bunch of statistics, it doesn't matter. If I don't feel safe on the subway, if I can't have my AirPods in because I need to, I have to feel like I'm more aware.
All right, that's all for this episode, Jess. Thank you for listening to Raging Moderates. Our producers are David Toledo and Shenenie Onike. Our technical director is Drew Burrows. You can find Raging Moderates on its own feed every Tuesday. That's right. Raging Moderates on its own feed. Please follow us wherever you get your podcasts. Just have a great rest of the week. You too, Scott. Thank you.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
No Mercy / No Malice: Addiction Economy

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
As read by George Hahn. https://www.profgalloway.com/addiction-economy/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
February 01, 2025
A Transformative Guide to Design Your Dream Life — with Sahil Bloom

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
Sahil Bloom discusses his book 'The 5 Types of Wealth' on this episode, while Scott briefly touches upon DeepSeek's new AI model.
January 30, 2025
Latin America’s IPO Market, How to Mentor Young Men, and Scott’s Stake in La Equidad Football Club

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
Scott discusses the decline of IPOs in Latin America, distinguishing between cyclical and structural factors, offers mentorship advice to young men, and shares involvement with La Equidad Football Club.
January 29, 2025
Prof G Markets: Project Stargate & The Rise of Oracle + Scott’s Stake in La Equidad Football Club

The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway
Scott and Ed discuss Netflix's Q4 earnings, Johnson & Johnson's latest earnings call, potential TikTok bidders, the new Stargate initiative as a strategic branding victory for the Trump administration benefitting Oracle in tech industry, thoughts on AI evolution, Scott's stake in a Colombian soccer team and its relation to his investment strategy.
January 27, 2025

Ask this episodeAI Anything

Hi! You're chatting with The Prof G Pod with Scott Galloway AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history