Trump's Impeachment Documentary: A new documentary, 'From Russia with Lev,' premieres tonight, shedding light on Trump's first impeachment with humor and critical insights from Lev Parnas. Following the film, there will be discussions on its impact and relevance in current politics.
Tonight, there’s a special debut of a documentary titled 'From Russia with Lev,' which covers the first impeachment of Donald Trump. The film explores the absurdity and severity of Trump’s actions during the scandal, blending humor with serious commentary. It features insights from Lev Parnas, who reflects on his surprising involvement in the political drama. Following the documentary, the host plans to discuss it further on the show, highlighting its significance and the story behind it. The film is a product of collaboration between notable filmmakers, aiming to deliver an entertaining yet enlightening narrative about an often-overlooked historical moment. As part of the broadcast, viewers are encouraged to stay tuned for in-depth news segments and discussions with relevant guests. This event not only marks a critical examination of political events but also represents the host’s effort to inform and engage the audience in contemporary issues.
Campaign Dynamics: Kamala Harris is actively campaigning with emotional events in key states, while Trump faces backlash for controversial remarks about Jews. The presidential race is very close, highlighting critical issues impacting voters.
Kamala Harris held an impactful campaign event in Michigan with Oprah Winfrey, showcasing the emotional stories of families affected by gun violence and abortion bans. Meanwhile, Donald Trump's recent remarks about the Jewish community stirred controversy and drew criticism. Polling shows that both candidates are in a tightly contested race in crucial swing states. Harris is actively campaigning in these states, highlighting her commitment, while Trump has taken a more low-profile approach recently. The stark contrast in their campaign activities reflects the urgency of the election and the significant issues at stake for voters. This is shaping up to be a very close presidential race, with both candidates pushing hard for support as they address hot-button issues impacting many Americans' lives.
Scapegoating Jews: Rising anti-Semitic rhetoric among political leaders is alarming, with blame directed at Jews for election outcomes, reminiscent of broader trends undermining democracy. This scapegoating and acceptance of Holocaust denial signal a dangerous alignment of hatred with anti-democratic movements.
In the lead-up to a crucial election, troubling anti-Semitic sentiments are surfacing among key political figures. Blaming Jews for potential election losses showcases a dangerous trend where minorities are scapegoated. This rhetoric parallels the rise of anti-democratic ideologies, as leaders use conspiracies about secret groups to undermine democracy. The normalization of Holocaust denial in prominent media also reflects a broader acceptance of harmful narratives. Such trends are alarming, as they encourage division and hatred at a time when unity is vital. If unchecked, this kind of discourse can erode democratic values and empower extremist ideologies, leaving society vulnerable to deeper societal rifts. It highlights the need for vigilance against hate speech and a commitment to protecting democratic principles.
Threat to Democracy: Republican leaders are increasingly ignoring extremist views within their ranks, posing a threat to democracy, as seen with Mark Robinson's Nazi claims and the push to refuse election results in Georgia.
Many Republican leaders are ignoring disturbing statements made by their candidates, which may undermine democracy. For instance, Trump supports Mark Robinson, a candidate in North Carolina who has called himself a Nazi and praised Hitler. This behavior highlights a troubling trend where party loyalty seems to outweigh moral responsibility, with Republican leaders failing to distance themselves from such extreme views. This situation is seen as part of a larger pattern, where there is a push to discredit voting processes, like in Georgia, where election results may be refused certification. These actions pose a significant threat to democratic values and raise concerns about what is happening within the Republican Party.
Election Chaos: In Georgia, pro-Trump officials are causing uncertainty in elections by refusing to certify results and mandating hand counts, which may create chaos and undermine public trust in the electoral process.
In Georgia, the pro-Trump majority on the state election board is refusing to certify election results, raising concerns about the integrity of the electoral process. They’ve introduced new rules, like requiring hand counts of ballots, which experts say could create chaos and delays. This situation could undermine public confidence and lead to a political crisis, as people may believe there’s something wrong with the elections when, in fact, the results are legitimate. The tactics being used aim to create uncertainty and confusion around election outcomes, which could set a worrying precedent for future elections and how we manage contested results. These changes are not just procedural; they have serious implications for how democracy functions, especially with significant political power at stake.
Election Integrity: Georgia's proposed election changes may create chaos and undermine trust in the voting process, prompting strong public opposition to protect election integrity.
Recent changes proposed by Georgia's election board are raising concerns about the integrity of upcoming elections. Critics believe that these changes may intentionally create chaos, making it difficult to accurately count votes. This could undermine trust in the electoral process, as delays and inaccuracies could provide a reason to doubt election results. Many local election officials and citizens are speaking out against these reforms, arguing that they are unnecessary solutions to problems that don't exist. Proper election administration is crucial, and anyone working in this field understands the complexities involved. If these rules lead to failures in election operations, there may be attempts to discredit the election outcomes and prolong disputes. Citizens in Georgia have demonstrated strong opposition to these proposed changes, signaling a desire to uphold the integrity of their democratic processes.
Georgia Elections: Sarah Tindall-Gazelle, the lone Democrat on Georgia's State Election Board, believes recent rule changes for hand-counting ballots could jeopardize election integrity and violate legal advice, expressing hope for judicial intervention to maintain established procedures amid national scrutiny of Georgia's voting process.
Sarah Tindall-Gazelle, the only Democrat on Georgia's State Election Board, is concerned about a recent rule change requiring hand-counting of ballots. She stresses that this change complicates the election process just weeks before voting, putting counties at risk of failure. Tindall-Gazelle believes there are serious legal issues with this move, as it goes against advice from legal authorities. She questions the motives behind the majority's decision, suggesting that it may not enhance security as claimed but serves another agenda. As the election approaches, she hopes the courts will intervene to uphold traditional election procedures, though she is not overly confident about it. Tindall-Gazelle’s insights highlight the stress and challenges facing Georgia's election system and reflect the national attention on the state's voting process.
Democratic Optimism: Democrats in North Carolina are optimistic about winning elections, driven by backlash against controversial Republican Mark Robinson and strong grassroots efforts to engage voters, particularly in rural areas. The campaign aims to create belief in a possible victory.
In North Carolina, Democrats are feeling hopeful about the upcoming elections, particularly because of the controversial Republican candidate, Mark Robinson. His extreme views and past online statements have raised concerns and anger among voters. With strong support for Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign, the Democratic Party is focusing on building a strong grassroots effort to mobilize voters, especially in rural areas. The state party's chair, Anderson Clayton, highlights the importance of making voters believe that a Democratic victory is possible. They are working closely with the Harris campaign, which has a significant number of staff focused on engaging communities and ensuring that their efforts translate into voter turnout. This renewed energy and focus on local outreach could change the political landscape in North Carolina, which has not voted for a Democratic presidential candidate since 2008.
Democracy Defense: In North Carolina, efforts are underway to engage voters and improve turnout, while a campaign in Georgia warns lawyers against unethical election practices. Both initiatives stress the importance of active participation and professional ethics in safeguarding democracy during elections.
In North Carolina, the State Democratic Party aims to mobilize voters ahead of upcoming elections, focusing on canvassing and phone banking to increase turnout, especially after Biden's narrow loss in 2020. Meanwhile, a new campaign warns Georgia lawyers against participating in unethical election challenges, highlighting the importance of professional ethics in law. This effort follows historical consequences faced by lawyers involved in past election disputes. By holding legal professionals accountable, the initiative seeks to ensure they do not undermine democracy. Civil society plays a crucial role in defending democracy, reminding citizens and professionals alike to uphold ethical standards, especially during contentious political times. This grassroots approach signals a proactive strategy to protect democratic processes through community involvement and institutional integrity.
Lev's Journey: Lev Parnas, a former hustler from Russian crime, reveals his journey leading to Trump's impeachment in the film "From Russia with Lev." His recorded confession highlights the link between crime and politics, explored further in discussions after the film.
Lev, a former hustler from the world of Russian organized crime, ended up being involved in events that led to Donald Trump's first impeachment. He recorded everything he did, showing a journey from criminal activities to regret. His story sheds light on political chaos and personal consequences brought about by his actions. The film "From Russia with Lev" delves into this complex narrative, exploring themes of remorse and the intertwining of crime and politics. Lev himself, along with his wife, will be discussing the film after it airs, providing viewers insight into his experiences and perspectives on his past decisions and their implications for both him and the political landscape.
MAGA members of Georgia election board advance another step in Trump's election subversion scheme
The Rachel Maddow Show
210 Episodes
Recent Episodes from The Rachel Maddow Show
Trump adds to burden of disaster emergency response with lies, misinformation
Plus, Republican Senate candidate Mike Rogers might have a voter fraud problem.
Special MSNBC post-debate analysis with Rachel Maddow and a panel of her MSNBC colleagues
Plus, 'The most damning moment': Vance seals debate loss by botching January 6 answer
Rachel Maddow lays out why you should care about JD Vance's real agenda
Plus, North Carolina Governor Roy Cooper hails the heroes working to help his state recover from Hurricane Helene.
Trump 'policy incoherence' defies efforts at candidate comparisons
Plus, the list of Republicans backing Kamala Harris continues to grow
MAGA members of Georgia election board advance another step in Trump's election subversion scheme
A special Friday edition of the Rachel Maddow Show
Maddow: 'We were supposed to get better at not having our chains yanked' by Trump
Plus, Hillary Clinton and Timothy Snyder
Special preview: Season 2 of “Velshi Banned Book Club”
MSNBC's Ali Velshi gives a special preview of the second season of the “Velshi Banned Book Club.” Book banning is happening more and more. Removing literature from library shelves, school syllabi, and summer reading lists isn’t just blatant censorship; it is the tip of the sword that threatens American democracy itself. In this preview, Ali reflects on why this issues is so personal for him and his family. Listen to the first two episodes now and follow the series: https://link.chtbl.com/vbbcs2_fdlw.
Subscribe to MSNBC Premium on Apple podcasts for access to episodes one week early, plus ad-free listening, and bonus content from this and other shows.
MSNBC Live: Democracy 2024
We’re thrilled to share a mashup of our MSNBC Live: Democracy 2024 event that we recently held at the Brooklyn Academy of Music. The whole day was a celebration of you, our viewers and listeners. It was the first of its kind in-person, interactive experience. We so enjoyed meeting so many of you. But if you couldn’t join us in person, you’re in luck – we’re sharing key conversations in this episode. For more, be sure to check out our TV special airing Saturday, September 14th at 9 p.m. ET. For your reference, here are timecodes for the sessions included here:
Claire McCaskill, Jen Psaki, and Andrea Mitchell 0:01:30-0:31:23
Chris Hayes & Kate Shaw 0:31:36-0:51:20
Andrew Weissmann & Ari Melber 0:51:25-1:12:53
Rachel Maddow & Lawrence O’Donnell 1:13:13-1:45:45
Special MSNBC coverage of the Kamala Harris-Donald Trump debate
Plus, 'She put a bully in his place': Gov. Tim Walz celebrates Kamala Harris debate performance (and Taylor Swift's endorsement)
'All the alarms going off all at once': Trump leans into extremism as election approaches
Plus, More information seen as key weapon to combat Trump election subversion