It's Monday, 27 January. Welcome to the President's Daily Brief. I'm Mike Baker, your eyes and ears on the world stage. Alright, let's get briefed. We'll start things off with what was reportedly a clash between President Trump and Denmark's Prime Minister
over the subject of Greenland, with Denmark reportedly in crisis mode as Trump is said to be pushing hard for U.S. control of the Arctic island, referring to Greenland as vital to U.S. national security interests. Later in the show, the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas continues to hold as President Trump pressures Jordan and Egypt to accept more Palestinian refugees and floats a plan to, quote, clean out Gaza.
Plus, a Secretary of State Marco Rubio takes office. The State Department announces a pause on nearly all foreign aid, making exceptions only for emergency funding to Israel and Egypt. And in today's Back of the Brief.
It took, well, five years, but the CIA, the Central Intelligence Agency, finally shifted positions on the origins of the COVID-19 virus, now supporting the lab leak theory as the most plausible theory. Yes, well, there was a lab in Wuhan carrying out COVID work with a history of lax safety protocols, and then COVID breaks out in Wuhan. Such a mystery if only we had some clues.
all while the Chinese regime continues to get away with providing zero transparency after several years and millions dead. But first, today's PDB Spotlight.
We're hearing reports of what's being described as a combative phone call between President Trump and the Danish Prime Minister, painting a contentious picture of U.S. Danish relations over Greenland. The story was first reported in the Financial Times, and according to European officials, the 45-minute conversation spiraled into direct confrontation.
with Trump aggressively pushing for U.S. control of Greenland and even threatening to levy massive tariffs against the Danes. One source said of the conversation, quote, the intent was very clear. Trump wants it. The Danes are now in crisis mode, end quote. Another added, quote, the Danes are utterly freaked out by this. Well, that must be a technical term.
At the heart of the dispute is Greenland, which is, of course, semi-autonomous territory. While it's part of the Kingdom of Denmark, it has its own government and controls most of its domestic affairs, including natural resources and local policies. However, Denmark retains authority over areas such as foreign policy and defense.
Now, Trump's interest in Greenland isn't new. He's been arguing since his last term that its strategic location is vital to American national security, particularly as China and Russia ramp up their Arctic investments. Greenland's strategic location along the shortest route between Europe and North America and its role in the U.S. ballistic missile warning system has made it a key priority for Trump.
National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes echoed this stating that the administration is focused on safeguarding U.S. interests in the Arctic while fostering, quote, mutual prosperity with Greenland. Meanwhile, the Danish Prime Minister has reportedly remained firm on the issue.
During the call with Trump, she cited remarks from Greenland's Parliament, reiterating that the island is not for sale and that its future lies in the hands of its own people. The Danish leader also proposed increased Arctic security measures from Denmark and emphasized the contributions of Danish businesses to the US economy, as well as the shared trade goals of the US and the European Union.
Still, Trump is, frankly, unlikely to back down on this. In his inaugural address, he framed the United States as a nation poised to expand its territory, hinting at a larger strategy that may include Greenland and even suggesting the U.S. retake the Panama Canal.
Meanwhile, amidst all of this talk of Greenland's strategic importance, the European Union's top military official, General Robert Briger, is suggesting that it would make sense to station EU troops in Greenland. In an interview with a German newspaper, Briger stated, in my view, it would make perfect sense not only to station US forces in Greenland, as has been the case to date, but also to consider stationing EU soldiers there in the future."
Now, Briger added that with Arctic ice melting, tensions with Russia and possibly China are likely to increase. He also stressed the importance of respecting borders as outlined in the UN Charter, though he acknowledged that any decision about EU troops would ultimately require political agreement.
It's worth noting that although Denmark is a member state, Greenland itself is not part of the EU. It voted to withdraw from the European community all the way back in 1985. All right, coming up next, the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas holds as President Trump pressures Jordan and Egypt on refugees. And Secretary of State Marco Rubio pauses nearly all foreign aid. I'll be right back.
Welcome back to the PDB. Turning to the fragile Israel Hamas ceasefire agreement. Four female Israeli soldiers taken hostage during the 7 October 2023 terror attack returned home Saturday as part of the second prisoner exchange. In return, Israel released some 200 Palestinian prisoners, including individuals convicted of deadly attacks.
In Gaza City, the four Israeli hostages, flanked by masked Hamas terrorists, offered faint gestures of resilience, waving and giving thumbs up as they emerged from months of captivity under what can only be described as extremely harsh conditions, including forced participation in Hamas propaganda videos.
The Iran-backed terror group, still seeking to project dominance after 15 months of war, paraded the hostages through the city to reinforce its narrative of control of the Gaza Strip. Thousands of people gathered to celebrate the soldiers' release in Tel Aviv, waving Israeli flags and chanting for the freedom of all remaining hostages.
The hostages' families rushed to embrace their loved ones and emotional reunions as the four soldiers were declared in stable condition at a nearby hospital. Celebrations erupted on the Palestinian side as well. In the Israeli-occupied West Bank city of Ramallah,
Thousands cheered the return of the freed Palestinian prisoners, many of the prisoners, wearing gray uniforms and appearing somewhat gaunt, dawned Hamas headbands distributed by the crowd and were carried on the shoulders of jubilant supporters. Israel's prison service confirms 121 of the Palestinian prisoners were serving life sentences after being convicted of deadly attacks against Israelis.
Among the released prisoners were Muhammad Ode and Wa'el Qasim, both convicted of the 2002 bombing at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem that killed nine people, five of them US citizens. A total of 70 of the released Palestinian prisoners were expelled to Egypt with Algeria, Tunisia and Turkey expressing willingness to accept them.
However, the ceasefire agreement has hit a snag, exposing, of course, the fragility of the arrangement. Israel delayed the return of displaced Palestinians to northern Gaza, citing Hamas' failure to release civilian hostage, Arbel Yaqud, taken from a kibbutz, or communal settlement, during the seven October terror attack.
Israel insisted that Yehud be released this week given her status as alive and a female civilian, which placed her in the highest priority category to be freed in this first phase of the ceasefire arrangement. A senior Hamas official dismissed the delay as a minor issue and pledged her release next week.
Prime Minister Netanyahu's office reaffirmed that no displaced individuals would return until Yahoo! was freed. Mediators, including Egypt and the U.S. National Security Council, are working to resolve the impasse. Meanwhile, tensions simmered near the Gaza Strip's Netzalim Corridor, where Palestinians defied the delays and attempted to return to their homes.
The Israeli military responded with warning shots, leading reportedly to the death of a Palestinian man, according to local Hamas officials, and that's a claim that the Israeli military denied, stating it only fired to disperse, quote, gatherings of dozens of suspects.
The fragile ceasefire agreement comes in the context of continued international scrutiny and broader debates over Gaza's future. On Saturday, aboard Air Force One, President Trump proposed relocating up to one and a half million Palestinians to neighboring Arab nations like Jordan and Egypt. Trump described Gaza as a, quote, demolition site and suggested resettling its population to, quote, clean out the war-torn area with the region rebuilt using international aid.
Jordan's foreign minister rejected the idea as, quote, firm and unwavering, warning it would erode Palestinian identity in Gaza and deepen the crisis. Well, not to mention that none of the Arab countries actually want to take in any Palestinian refugees. Trump, however, insisted the plan could be temporary, describing Gaza as a region mired in conflict for centuries, suggesting to, quote, build housing in a different location where Palestinians can maybe live in peace for a change, end quote.
as negotiations for the second phase of the agreement, which entails the release of all hostages and a lasting halt to the fighting, have yet to begin, Israeli officials warned military operations in Gaza would resume if Hamas fails to meet its commitments of releasing the remaining hostages. The next hostage in prisoner exchange is slated for Saturday.
All right, moving over to the US. In a sharp pivot toward President Trump's America First policy, the State Department froze nearly all foreign aid on Friday, leaving just emergency food assistance and military funding for Israel and Egypt spared from the suspension.
A memo reviewed by AFP dispatched to all U.S. diplomatic posts revealed that Secretary of State Marco Rubio instructed a halt to new foreign aid obligations and extensions. Rubio's directive specified that, quote, no new funds shall be obligated for new awards or extensions of existing awards until each proposed new award or extension has been reviewed and approved, end quote.
The memo aligns with an executive order signed by Trump last week, just hours after his inauguration, suspending foreign assistance for 90 days. In the order, Trump claimed that the US foreign aid was often quote, antithetical to American values and emphasized the need for alignment with the administration's foreign policy objectives.
The freeze affects billions of dollars in foreign assistance across multiple sectors, including high-profile programs like the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, which has provided HIV-AIDS treatment to millions in Africa since its inception in 2003 under then-President George W. Bush.
Notably, the freeze also halts military aid to Ukraine, a country that has been a recipient of U.S. weapons and financial support in the billions of dollars to counter Russia's ongoing war effort.
Israel and Egypt remain exceptions, their funding safeguarded due to their strategic importance in US foreign policy. Israel has seen its military aid expanded in major arms packages from the US in the aftermath of the Hamas terror attack on 7 October of 2023. Conversely, regions like Sudan and Syria will see emergency food aid as their only continued support during this period of time.
In a public statement on Wednesday, Rubio further justified Trump's executive order, declaring, quote, every dollar we spend, every program we fund, and every policy we pursue must be justified by its contribution to U.S. safety, strength, and posterity. The Trump administration has set an 85-day timeline to evaluate existing aid programs and determine their future within Trump's foreign policy framework.
However, the decision, as you might imagine, was not met without criticism. Representative Gregory Meeks, the top-ranking Democrat on the House Foreign Relations Committee and Democrat Representative Lois Frankl, condemned the move, warning of devastating fallout for vulnerable populations. In a joint letter, they stated, quote, now US credibility is on the line, and it appears we will cut and run from American commitments to our partners around the world, end quote.
Critics further argue that the freeze jeopardizes decades of bipartisan consensus on foreign aid as a cornerstone of American influence and global stability. Congress, which appropriates foreign aid, may actually end up challenging the administration's move. As the world's largest donor, the US provided over $64 billion in overseas development assistance just in 2023. That's citing data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Observers warned that this aid freeze could erode US influence and open the door for adversaries like China, which of course has aggressively expanded its global footprint through foreign investment. All right, coming up in today's back of the brief. After five years, the CIA now supports the lab leak theory as the most plausible explanation for the origins of COVID-19. I'll be right back with those details.
In today's back of the brief, after five years, the CIA has endorsed the lab leak hypothesis as the most plausible explanation of COVID-19's origins, albeit with low confidence. This shift comes under newly appointed Director John Radcliffe, signaling a fresh approach to a debate that has frankly fractured intelligence agencies.
The CIA's alignment with the FBI and the Department of Energy, which also supported the lab leak theory, points to growing momentum that the virus may have emerged from the Wuhan Institute of Virology, you think? Yet this endorsement arrives without any new evidence, and that's an admission made by a CIA spokesperson.
Radcliffe, previously the director of national intelligence under the first Trump administration, made this reassessment a top priority upon taking office. In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News, Radcliffe lambasted the agency's long-standing neutrality on COVID-19's origins, stating, quote, the CIA has been sitting on the sidelines for five years and not making an assessment about the origins of COVID. That's a day one thing for me, he said, end quote.
His remarks underscore a broader push to refocus national security strategy on perceived threats from China, which he identifies as a critical adversary. The timing of this development is significant. Former CIA Director William Burns reportedly urged the agency to adopt a clear position on COVID-19's origins during his final days at the agency, paving the way for Radcliffe to declassify the agency's findings.
This pivot places renewed scrutiny on a theory that, well, once was dismissed as fringe. Proponents of the lablic hypothesis have long pointed to US-funded research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, and its proximity to the wet market, where initial COVID-19 cases emerged. Sometimes we would refer to those as clues. Critics of the zoonotic theory, which posits at the virus jumped from animals to humans, note that no intermediary host has ever been identified.
Further complicating the debate are whistleblower allegations that some CIA analysts were bribed to dismiss the Lab League theory. These claims of heightened tensions within the intelligence community with the National Intelligence Council still backing the zoonotic explanation.
The lack of consensus underscores the enduring complexity of pinpointing the virus's origins. Well, in large part because the Chinese regime under Xi Jinping has refused to provide any transparency or to collaborate in any meaningful way with the global community.
Yeah, so there's that. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Tom Cotton, a prominent advocate of the lab league theory, praised Radcliffe on X, stating, quote, I commend Director Radcliffe for fulfilling his promise to release this conclusion. The most important thing now is to make China pay for unleashing a plague on the world, end quote.
Beijing consistently denies the lab leak theory, maintaining that the virus emerged naturally. However, these denials have done little to temper tensions, as Radcliffe's tenure signals a hardening of the US posture toward China. With millions of lives lost to COVID-19, Radcliffe is calling for accountability from Beijing. Well, good luck with that, setting the stage for potential diplomatic friction in the months ahead.
And that, my friends, is the president's daily brief from Monday, 27 January. Now, it's all the hepcats know. To listen to the show, add free. Well, it is simple. Just become a premium member of the president's daily brief by visiting pdbpremium.com.
And I hope you had a chance to check out this past weekend's episode of our extended weekend show, the PDB Situation Report. You can catch it as well as past episodes on our YouTube channel, and you can find our YouTube channel at President's Daily Brief, as well as, of course, all podcast platforms. I'm Mike Baker, and I'll be back later today with the PDB afternoon bulletin. Until then, stay informed, stay safe, stay cool.