Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Connecting with Neighbors and Community in Challenging TimesBuilding strong community connections can bring hope and support during uncertain times. Engage with neighbors, prepare for emergencies, and find comfort in shared experiences through music or art.

      No matter where we come from or what challenges we face, building strong community connections can bring hope and support in uncertain times. Dr. Joy introduces Neighbor to Neighbor, a California volunteer network that emphasizes the importance of connecting with neighbors and preparing for emergencies. Meanwhile, Amy Winehouse's "Back to Black" movie invites us to connect with her story and forget our troubles through music. ZYN nicotine pouches offer a convenient and discreet way to satisfy nicotine cravings. In a more profound context, artist and activist Adam Broomberg shares his experiences growing up as a Jewish person in apartheid South Africa and breaking free from Zionism. His family's Holocaust survival history influenced his upbringing, and he now uses his art to raise awareness about the daily crimes committed by the IDF in Palestine. Despite facing accusations of being anti-Semitic, Broomberg continues to use his voice to advocate for peace and justice.

    • Jewish immigrants' complex experiences in South Africa during apartheidDespite facing discrimination in Europe, Jewish immigrants found new privilege and power in South Africa, leading to involvement in anti-apartheid movement and integration into regime, reflecting the complexity of identity and privilege.

      The experience of Jewish immigrants in South Africa during apartheid was complex and multifaceted. Despite facing discrimination in Europe, they found new privilege and power once identified as white in Africa. This transformation led to both involvement in the anti-apartheid movement and integration into the apartheid regime. The speaker's personal journey reflects this complexity, as he grew up in a Zionist school but was influenced by his politically active older siblings to question and oppose Zionism. This connection between personal experiences and larger social issues ultimately shaped his anti-Zionist beliefs, which were not universally accepted in South Africa. The story of his family's history, including the loss of a child and the survival of the Holocaust, adds depth to this exploration of identity, privilege, and resistance.

    • Growing up with conflicting realities of Israel and apartheidExposure to different realities led the speaker to challenge ideological walls and recognize suffering of Palestinians, drawing parallels between apartheid in South Africa and Israel-Palestine.

      Growing up during the height of the Cold War, the speaker was exposed to two parallel realities: the collection of funds for the Jewish National Fund to make the desert bloom in Israel, and the proxy wars in Africa between national liberation movements and colonial regimes. While being told that the end of apartheid in South Africa would mean the end of white people there, they were also instilled with the notion of Israel as a place of salvation. However, at the age of 16, the speaker became an activist and started educating white kids about apartheid. Through forming genuine friendships with people of different backgrounds, the speaker was able to pierce the ideological walls and recognize the existence and suffering of the Palestinian people, drawing parallels between apartheid in South Africa and Israel-Palestine. Ultimately, the speaker's lived experiences shaped their understanding of settler colonialism and the importance of breaking down walls of othering.

    • Historical and political structures shaping perceptions and divisionsHistorical and political structures can perpetuate false and misleading constructs, leading to divisions and misunderstandings between people. Breaking down these barriers is essential for fostering understanding and connection.

      Historical and political structures have the power to shape perceptions and create divisions between people. The speaker shares their personal experiences of growing up with racial and ethnic segregation in South Africa and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, which led them to question the constructs they were taught and develop an anti-Zionist stance. The speaker also highlights the ongoing restrictions on interracial marriage and the impact of physical barriers like the apartheid wall on shaping perceptions of "the other." The speaker draws parallels between the structures built around the plague in Foucault's hypothesis and the walls and restrictions in the context of apartheid and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The speaker's experiences show that these structures can perpetuate false and misleading constructs, and that breaking down these barriers is essential for fostering understanding and connection between people.

    • Being a vocal Jewish anti-Zionist can lead to accusations of anti-SemitismSpeaking out against Zionist policies as a Jewish anti-Zionist can result in false accusations of anti-Semitism, highlighting the need for education and awareness on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

      Being a vocal Jewish anti-Zionist can lead to accusations of anti-Semitism, even from high-level officials, as was the case for the speaker during an incident in Germany. This experience, which occurred after the death of his Jewish mother and just weeks before the Documenta art event in Kassel, involved Stefan Hensel, the anti-Semitism commissioner of Hamburg, who labeled the speaker as a "hateful antisemite who advocates for terrorism against Jews." This label was unwarranted, as the speaker's vocal support for Palestinian rights, particularly the BDS Movement, was the cause of the accusations. The BDS Movement, which stands for boycott, divestment, and sanctions, is a nonviolent means of resistance that gained popularity during the second intifada. The comparison can be drawn to the role of sanctions and divestments in ending apartheid in South Africa. Despite the peaceful nature of the movement, it has become a controversial term, often used as a catchphrase to discredit those advocating for Palestinian rights. The incident serves as a reminder of the potential consequences of speaking out against Zionist policies and the need for continued awareness and education on the complexities of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

    • Weaponizing Antisemitism to Silence CriticismThe term 'antisemitism' can be misused to silence critics, limit free speech, and hinder discussions on social and political issues. This was seen in the case of Documenta 14 and the BDS movement.

      The weaponization of the term "antisemitism" can be used to silence criticism towards certain groups or causes, as seen in the case of Documenta 14 and the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. During Documenta 14, a mural depicting an Israeli soldier as a pig was deemed anti-Semitic, leading to the removal of three professors and the accusation of antisemitism towards them. Stefan Hensel, a German professor, used this term to target those perceived as pro-Palestinian. Hensel, who had ties to Israel and an Islamophobic organization, accused these professors despite having no concrete evidence of their antisemitic beliefs. This weaponization of antisemitism is unfortunate as it can limit free speech and hinder important discussions about social and political issues. Furthermore, in 2019, Germany attempted to make BDS a hate crime, further perpetuating the stigma surrounding the movement. This shows how the term antisemitism can be used to silence and intimidate individuals or groups, ultimately hindering progress towards understanding and resolution of complex issues.

    • The history of anti-Semitism and ZionismUnderstanding the complex history of anti-Semitism and Zionism is crucial for addressing contemporary issues like anti-Semitism in Germany and the BDS movement.

      The history of anti-Semitism in Europe, as exemplified by figures like Franco, intersects with the history of Zionism and the desire to remove Jews from Europe and establish a Jewish state in Palestine. This complex history is relevant to understanding contemporary issues, such as the real threat of anti-Semitism in Germany and the controversy surrounding the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. The speaker's personal experiences and encounters with figures like Franco and Bonaventure illustrate the complexities and intensity of the divide between anti-Zionists and Zionists within the Jewish community. The speaker also emphasizes the need to address and confront real instances of anti-Semitism, particularly in Germany, where there have been numerous reported incidents.

    • Destruction of olive trees by Israeli settlers contradicts Zionist attachment to landIsraeli settlers' destruction of olive trees in Palestinian lands contradicts the core Zionist belief of attachment to the land, while the complexity of the situation is shown through conflicting beliefs and actions among individuals.

      The destruction of olive trees in Palestinian lands by Israeli settlers is a clear example of hateful actions that contradict the notion of Zionism being about a sacred attachment to the land. Adam, who works to preserve olive trees, shares his experiences of being attacked while documenting the destruction. The irony lies in the fact that during the anniversary of Kristallnacht, a Jewish person threatened Adam, a fellow Jew, over a sign supporting Jews against fascism everywhere. This highlights the complexity of the situation, where individuals may hold conflicting beliefs and actions, and the importance of understanding the nuances behind them.

    • Tensions surrounding historical events and the Israeli-Palestinian conflictDeep-rooted tensions and complexities surrounding historical events and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict can lead to misunderstandings, violence, and discrimination. Promoting open dialogue, understanding, and respect for different perspectives and experiences is crucial.

      The commemoration of historical events, such as the Nakba or the Holocaust, can lead to heated conflicts and tensions, particularly when it comes to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. This was evident in the story shared about the Jewish voices organization's commemoration being disrupted by riot police, resulting in the arrest and brutal treatment of a 52-year-old Jewish man. The incident was then sensationalized in media headlines, perpetuating a narrative that pitted Palestinians against Jews. This incident highlights the deep-rooted tensions and complexities surrounding these historical events and the ongoing conflict, which can lead to misunderstandings, violence, and discrimination. It also underscores the importance of promoting open dialogue, understanding, and respect for different perspectives and experiences. The incident also raises concerns about the treatment of migrants and people of color in public spaces, as seen in the example of the swimming pool law in Berlin. These issues are interconnected and require a nuanced and complex approach to address the underlying issues of discrimination, prejudice, and systemic inequalities.

    • Historical parallels between past Jewish persecution and current Israeli policiesHistorical comparisons remind us of the importance of addressing past and present injustices and the need for ongoing dialogue and understanding.

      Historical parallels can be drawn between the past persecution of Jews and the current debates surrounding Israeli policies. During the 1960s, prominent Jewish intellectuals, including Albert Einstein, criticized Israeli settler policies as fascist, which is now considered antisemitic. Recently, a Palestinian man was branded with a star of David, evoking memories of the Holocaust when Jews were forced to wear yellow stars. The speaker, Adam Broomberg, feels compelled to wear a red star of David in solidarity against actions committed in Israel's name. These historical parallels serve as a reminder of the importance of addressing past and present injustices and the need for ongoing dialogue and understanding. For more information on Adam Broomberg's advocacy work, follow him on Instagram @AdamBroomberg.

    • Misunderstanding Class in the USThe way people talk about class is often misguided, reducing it to aesthetics and grievances, and obscuring the social relations inherent in class. Understanding class as a social relation and supporting organizations addressing social issues is crucial.

      The way people talk about class in the United States is often misguided and reductionist, leading to misunderstandings and the conflation of class with race and gender. The speaker expresses frustration with this trend, as it obscures the social relations inherent in class and reduces it to aesthetics and grievances. The speaker argues that this confusion arose due to the right's distortion of the labor theory of value, a leftist conception of labor that built the identity of the working class in the 1800s. While the term "labor theory of value" is often associated with Marx, it encompasses both Marx's law of value and the slogans of the workers' movements. The speaker encourages listeners to consider the importance of understanding class as a social relation and to support organizations, such as Border Kindness and Free Ship Collective, that are working to address pressing social issues.

    • Labor builds wealth and workers hold powerMarx built on Lincoln's labor theory, believing workers held power through collective labor and essential resources, shaping labor movements and the goal of abolishing class society

      According to Lincoln's labor theory, labor is the foundation of all wealth and capital is a result of labor. Marx, while influenced by this idea, developed it further into a theory of value and class struggle. Marx believed that workers, particularly factory workers, were building a new world and held the power to manage it through their collective labor. This idea contributed to the formation of the workers' identity and the workers' movement. However, it's important to note that not all workers were factory workers, and other groups, such as coal miners and energy workers, also held significant power through their ability to control essential resources. Ultimately, this labor theory of value shaped the workers' understanding of themselves and their role in society, leading to the rise of labor movements and the eventual goal of abolishing class society.

    • The Idealized Workers' Movement vs. RealityMarx's concept of the lumpenproletariat reveals the challenges in organizing the working class due to their disinterest in socialism and the relevance of the workers' movement to their lives. This fear of poverty and degeneracy fueled class hatred.

      The workers' movement, as romanticized in its propaganda, presents a rosy picture of workers having the power to build a new world. However, this idealized version obscures the reality of the situation, making it difficult to understand the movement's defeat and the various ideologies and manifestations that emerged. Marx's concept of the lumpenproletariat, often depicted as a disreputable and dissolute figure, highlights the challenges in organizing the working class due to their disinterest in socialism and the relevance of the workers' movement to their lives. The lumpenproletariat served as a symbol of the undignified worker and a source of class hatred, revealing the workers' fear of being pushed back into poverty and degeneracy. Despite attempts to reframe the lumpenproletariat as a functional class, Marx's original writings on the subject reveal a moralistic and Victorian perspective that undermines the objective analysis of the workers' struggle.

    • Early feminist movement's intolerance towards Marilyn MonroeThe early feminist movement's intolerance towards those who didn't fit their narrow definition of respectability and the overlooked value of caretaking and domestic work can hinder social movements' progress towards liberation.

      Social movements, even those aiming for liberation, can be marred by intolerance and the dehumanization of those who don't fit their narrow definition of respectability. This was evident in the early feminist movement's treatment of Marilyn Monroe, who was criticized harshly by some feminists for not fitting their image of what a liberated woman should be. This kind of thinking not only creates divisions within movements but also leaves them vulnerable to attacks from external sources. Another issue highlighted in the discussion is the narrow definition of productivity and labor, which often overlooks the contributions of jobs traditionally associated with women, such as caretaking and domestic work. This oversight can lead to a skewed understanding of value and the realities of working class labor. Both of these trends, the dehumanization of those who don't fit the mold and the narrow definition of productivity, have significant consequences for social movements and can hinder their progress towards liberation. It's crucial for movements to recognize and challenge these trends in order to create a more inclusive and effective path towards change.

    • Ideological focus on production leads to devaluation of care laborThe societal bias towards masculine, productive labor has led to the devaluation of care labor, which makes up a significant portion of economic production, and has left the workers' movement vulnerable to being consumed by neoliberal economics.

      The ideological focus on production in the workers' movement has led to a devaluation of care labor, which makes up a significant portion of economic production. This has resulted in certain fields and workers being considered insufficiently productive or not "real jobs." For instance, Starbucks workers perform a large amount of care labor, saving lives and taking care of customers, but this labor is often overlooked due to societal biases towards masculine, productive labor. Graeber argues that all economic production can be seen as care labor, as it is ultimately produced to care for people. However, care labor is not considered real labor due to these biases. This ideological shift, fueled by a maniacal focus on production, has left a "bomb" under the workers' movement, which could have been set off by the shift towards care labor being the standard form of work. Instead, the ruling class used racism to detonate this bomb, consuming the workers' movement and turning the country into a neoliberal, Reagan-era economy.

    • Understanding Productive vs Unproductive Labor in Marx's TheoryProductive labor generates capital, while nonproductive labor does not. The distinction is not about moral worth but economic function.

      The distinction between productive and unproductive labor, as used by Karl Marx, is a technical term with no moral content. It refers to labor that produces capital for the capital-owning class versus labor that does not. This distinction has caused confusion and moral judgment, but it's essential to understanding Marx's economic theories. For example, a dancer's performance for a paying audience is productive labor because it generates capital for the production company. But the same performance for friends is nonproductive labor because no capital is being created. It's important to remember that this distinction is not about the moral worth of the labor or the people performing it but rather about the economic function it serves. James, a mutual aid worker, made a heartfelt plea for support to help those in need at the US southern border. He asked listeners to donate to two organizations, Board of Kindness and Free Ship Collective, to provide essentials like food, water, blankets, and tarps. These donations can make a significant impact, even with small contributions. If you're interested in learning more or donating, you can find the organizations' information in James' message.

    • Marx's distinction between productive and unproductive laborMarx's distinction between productive and unproductive labor is not a moral judgment, but rather a measure of contribution to capital production and accumulation. Misusing it as a moral category can lead to harmful consequences.

      According to Marx, the distinction between productive and unproductive labor is not a moral judgment, but rather a measure of whether a given labor contributes to the production and accumulation of capital for the bourgeoisie. Milton, a poet, was considered unproductive because he didn't produce capital directly, while a factory worker who produces goods for capital valorization is considered productive. However, when this distinction is used as a moral category, it can lead to harmful consequences, as seen in the cases of the Nazis and Ronald Reagan. The Nazis used this distinction to dehumanize certain groups and justify their persecution, while Reagan used it to justify policies that favored certain types of labor over others. It's important to remember that this distinction is a tool used to understand the functioning of a capitalist economy, not a moral judgment.

    • The Nazi ideology as an 'Aryan mirror' of MarxismThe Nazi regime, like Marxism, saw commodities as having both physical and social components, but unlike Marxism, it allowed labor to appear as purely material, leading to the belief in linear industrial progress and the devaluation of certain groups based on perceived productivity and heritable traits.

      The Nazi ideology, which aimed to "purify" their race by distinguishing productive and non-productive members of society, was a complex and horrific form of anti-capitalist system. Moishe Postone, a social theorist, described it as an "Aryan mirror" of Marxism. This means that, like Marxism, the Nazi regime saw commodities as having both a concrete physical component and an abstract social relation component. However, unlike Marxism, the Nazis allowed concrete labor to appear as a purely material creative process, separate from capitalist social relations. This led to the belief that industrial production was a linear descendant of natural, artisanal labor and that certain groups, such as Jews, were parasitic and unproductive. This ideology resulted in the horrific manifestation of mass exterminations and the devaluation of human life based on perceived productivity and heritable traits. It's important to understand the depth and complexity of this ideology to grasp its ongoing impact on society.

    • The distinction between productive and unproductive workers has fueled dangerous ideologies throughout historyThe distinction between productive and unproductive workers has been used to justify violent ideologies, such as Nazism, and continues to shape modern political discourse through racial and gender divisions.

      The distinction between productive and unproductive workers has been used throughout history to fuel dangerous ideologies and violence. In the case of Nazism, the abstract concept of finance capital was personified as Jewish people, leading to the extermination of European Jewry. This anti-Semitic worldview was not just a cover for anti-capitalist sentiments, but an intrinsic part of it. The Holocaust was not just the brutal seizure of power, but a revolution against the abstract, with the extermination camps serving as a grotesque negation of the capitalist factory. The Nazi ideology, which pits the abstract against the concrete, continues to influence modern political thoughts on both the left and the right. Reagan's use of the myth of the welfare queen is another example of this, as it transformed the identity of the worker into a racial category and pitted productive white workers against black welfare recipients. This opposition, fueled by racism and misogynoir, has continued to shape modern political discourse.

    • Reagan's presidency pitted white and black workers against each other using racial prejudiceReagan's administration used racial prejudice to divide workers, creating a racialized discourse around class, and justifying unnecessary spending on welfare fraud investigations

      During Reagan's presidency, there was an effort to pit white workers against black workers by invoking racial prejudice and stigmatizing those on welfare. This was not about the money, but rather about creating division and removing black workers from the labor category. The propaganda, which had no regard for reality, was effective in tapping into emotions of racism and people's dislike of work, transforming class into a racialized discourse and distorting the way Americans think about it. A notable example of this was the welfare fraud narrative, which was used to justify spending more money trying to combat fraud than was saved, while the biggest welfare cheat, Brett Favre, received millions in welfare funds for personal projects.

    • Reagan's ideology excluded black workers from the working class narrativeReagan's administration in the 1980s excluded black workers from the collective imagination of the working class, perpetuating a narrative dominated by white people, with serious implications for understanding and addressing the realities of the working class and the labor market.

      The ideological project of Reagan's administration in the 1980s played a significant role in excluding black workers from the collective imagination of the working class in the United States. This ideological shift allowed white pundits to focus solely on white workers in their discourse, perpetuating a narrative that overlooks the existence and contributions of black workers. This dynamic continues to this day, with 80% of discourse about class being intertwined with race or gender, and 80% of such discourse being dominated by white people. The consequences of this exclusion have serious implications for understanding and addressing the realities of the working class and the labor market. It's essential to recognize and challenge this narrative to ensure a more inclusive and accurate portrayal of the working class and its diverse membership.

    • Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict Over Nagorno-Karabakh EscalatesAzerbaijan's invasion of Nagorno-Karabakh, predominantly Armenian-populated region, cuts off vital corridor, Armenian military outmatched, humanitarian crisis worsens, Azeri goals different from last war, external support limited, Russia's role unclear

      The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, located in the South Caucasus, remains unresolved and has escalated into a new military invasion by Azerbaijan. This region, which has been a source of tension for over a thousand years, is predominantly populated by Armenians but is claimed by Azerbaijan as their territory. Despite a ceasefire agreement in 2020, the situation has deteriorated, with Azerbaijan cutting off the Lachin Corridor, effectively starving the region, and launching a new invasion in 2023. The Armenian military is significantly outmatched, with most of their heavy equipment destroyed in the previous war, and they are unable to receive external support due to being completely cut off. The Azeri goals this time around are different, with a focus on the collapse of the Armenian government and the capture of Stepanakert, the capital of Nagorno-Karabakh. The conflict is not between near-peer powers, with the Artsakh Defense Army being a self-defense group, and Azerbaijan receiving military support from countries like Israel and Turkey. Russia, a key player in the region, has not delivered on weapons sales to Armenia since the last war. The humanitarian situation in Nagorno-Karabakh is dire, with the population facing food shortages and being unable to leave due to the closure of the Lachin Corridor.

    • Protests and complex geopolitical issue in Armenia over Nagorno-KarabakhArmenia protests against govt and external powers due to complex, historical conflict with Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh. Economic factors and long-standing hostility fuel the crisis, which could lead to instability in the region.

      The ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh is causing widespread unrest and anger in Armenia, with protests against the government and various external powers. The situation is complicated by historical alliances and shifting diplomatic alignments. The conflict, which has escalated recently, is not a simple matter of liberation or self-determination, but rather a complex geopolitical issue with deep historical roots. The current situation is being fueled in part by economic factors, including the price of oil, and the involved parties have a long history of hostility and propaganda against each other. The situation is likely to worsen as the fighting continues and the humanitarian situation deteriorates. The future of the current Armenian government is uncertain, and the situation could lead to significant instability in the region.

    • Historical tensions and Soviet policies fuel Nagorno-Karabakh conflictThe Nagorno-Karabakh conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan is rooted in long-standing historical tensions and Soviet border redrawing, not religious differences. Global powers' involvement is driven by the geopolitical interests, not ethical or moral considerations.

      The ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the Nagorno-Karabakh region is rooted in long-standing historical tensions and Soviet policies, rather than religious differences. The current conflict has its origins in the late 1800s and early 1900s, with the Soviet Union's redrawing of borders in the 1920s and 1930s being a significant contributing factor. The current media coverage of the conflict is heavily influenced by propaganda and lobbying efforts, with the Armenian lobby playing a significant role in shaping public perception. Despite the involvement of global powers like the EU and the US, their actions are primarily driven by geopolitical interests rather than ethical or moral considerations. The conflict has resulted in a long-standing frozen conflict with occasional outbreaks of violence, and a de facto independent Republic of Artsakh in the region.

    • The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh leaves limited options for resolutionWithout immediate intervention, the ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh risks continued bloodshed and potential consequences beyond the region.

      The ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh leaves limited options for productive action at present. Armenia, due to its military weakness and geopolitical constraints, lacks the ability to stop the conflict. On the other hand, major global powers have the capability to intervene and halt the conflict but have shown no signs of doing so. The history of ineffective sanctions and the likelihood of further aggression against Armenia if Artsakh falls make the situation dire. The only proven method to halt a genocide is through military force. However, without immediate intervention, the slaughter in Nagorno-Karabakh will continue until one side is defeated. The potential consequences of this conflict extending beyond Artsakh are significant, making the situation a pressing concern for international intervention.

    • Caucasus Conflict: A Complex Issue with Historical Roots and Power ImbalancesRecent conflicts in the Caucasus, specifically between Armenia and Azerbaijan, have thawed but power discrepancies hinder meaningful negotiations. Brutal treatment of Armenian civilians by Azerbaijani forces and lack of international intervention call for diplomatic efforts to prevent further violence and protect affected populations.

      The current geopolitical situation in the Caucasus region, specifically between Armenia and Azerbaijan, is a complex issue with deep historical roots and significant power imbalances. The speaker emphasizes that recent conflicts, such as the one in 2020, have thawed after a period of freezing, but the power discrepancy between the two nations makes meaningful negotiations challenging. The speaker also highlights the brutal treatment of Armenian civilians by Azerbaijani forces and the lack of international intervention to protect them. The speaker argues that diplomatic efforts are necessary to prevent further violence and ensure the rights of existence for affected populations. The speaker also expresses concern that the international community may be turning a blind eye to the situation due to its location and the historical nature of the conflict. Ultimately, the speaker urges for a more active and engaged diplomatic approach to prevent the continuation of this century-long cycle of violence.

    • Preventing further aggression from AzerbaijanThe presence of peacekeeping forces is crucial to prevent Azerbaijan's invasion and potential genocide in the Nagorno-Karabakh region. Artsakh's self-determination and functioning state are at risk without international intervention.

      The ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over the region of Nagorno-Karabakh is a recent geopolitical issue with major implications for various countries. The realistic solution to prevent further aggression from Azerbaijan is to provide a physical barrier through the presence of peacekeeping forces. This is necessary as Azerbaijan is a fascist dictatorship with a history of denying entry to Armenians, and any potential invasion would mean the destruction of the lives and livelihoods of people in the region. Without immediate international intervention, the situation could lead to a genocide. The Artsakh Defense Army is doing its best to resist, but without physical intervention, it is only a matter of time before Artsakh is invaded. The only constant track record of the people of Artsakh is their desire for self-determination, and they have built a functioning state with free and fair elections and various ministries. The international community must act now to prevent the destruction of this republic and the lives of its people.

    • Urgent need for international intervention in Nagorno-Karabakh conflictThe ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh requires international intervention to prevent further loss of life. The Biden administration could strengthen ties with Armenia and help it move away from Russian influence, but providing aid to affected communities is challenging due to the ongoing siege.

      The ongoing conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh remains complex and volatile, with no clear solution in sight. Joe Bernstein, a journalist, expressed his concern over the escalating violence and the lack of international intervention. He emphasized that someone not directly involved in the conflict, such as the United States, needs to step in to prevent further loss of life. Bernstein also suggested that the Biden administration could use this opportunity to strengthen ties with Armenia and help it move away from Russia's influence. However, he acknowledged the challenges in providing support to the affected communities due to the ongoing siege and the limited options for sending aid. Overall, the conversation underscored the urgency of finding a peaceful resolution to the conflict and the potential role the international community could play in bringing about lasting peace.

    • Documenting human rights abuses at US-Mexico border, providing aid and advocating for policy changesQuaker-based organization focuses on addressing human rights issues at US-Mexico border, providing aid to migrants in rural areas, and advocating for policy changes to ensure safety and dignity

      The American Foreign Service Committee's US Mexico Border Program, a Quaker-based human rights organization, focuses on documenting civil and human rights abuses at the US-Mexico border, advocating for policy changes, and providing aid and information to border communities. Recently, the organization has shifted its focus to rural areas and has been providing aid to migrants in the desert and at transit centers in response to increased border chaos, including the detention of people between walls in San Ysidro and the open desert in Jacumba. Pedro, who works with the organization, has seen firsthand the revolving door of roughly 200 to 250 migrants being held daily in hidden camps in Hakumba. The conditions are open-air, and access is limited, making it difficult for organizations to provide aid and support. The situation at the border continues to evolve, and the organization's work is essential in addressing the human rights abuses and advocating for policy changes to ensure the safety and dignity of migrants.

    • Complexity of migrant camps at U.S.-Mexico borderCommunity organizations and volunteers are providing essential support for migrants at U.S.-Mexico border camps, as border patrol fails to provide basic necessities

      The situation at the U.S.-Mexico border regarding migrant camps is complex and multifaceted. While some camps are more visible and have fewer people due to increased border patrol presence, others are hidden and continue to receive a steady influx of new arrivals. Border patrol is not providing basic necessities like food, shelter, or sanitation, leaving it to community organizations and volunteers to fill the gap. This includes providing water, food, clothing, and medical supplies. In San Ysidro, there are several encampments, with one primary location at Whiskey 8. Previously, Border Patrol had relocated single adult men to Spooners Mesa, resulting in large crowds and a lack of resources. Despite these challenges, community members and organizations continue to provide essential support to those in need.

    • Detained and Processed: The Humanitarian Crisis at the BorderDespite border patrol's denials, individuals are being detained and lack access to basic necessities during processing. Community response has been strong, but continued support and policy changes are needed.

      Despite border patrol's claims that individuals crossing the border are not under their custody, there is evidence suggesting otherwise. These individuals, who are often hungry, thirsty, and injured, are being detained and processed at border patrol stations before being transported to various locations for further processing. During this detention period, they are supposed to be provided with food, water, shelter, and medical care according to national standards. However, many report not receiving these necessities. Once processed, individuals are transported to facilities in San Diego County, where organizations are working to provide support with food, clothing, transportation, and housing. The community response to this humanitarian crisis has been impressive, but the need for support continues to be great. If you're not in San Diego and would like to help, consider donating to organizations providing aid or advocating for policy changes to ensure that individuals' basic needs are met while they go through the asylum process.

    • Complex humanitarian crisis at U.S.-Mexico borderLarge numbers of people arrive daily needing food, shelter, and water. Sustained support essential for vulnerable individuals, including families and children, amid uncertain situation.

      The ongoing situation at the U.S.-Mexico border is a complex and evolving humanitarian crisis, with large numbers of people arriving daily in need of basic necessities such as food, shelter, and water. Organizations are stepping up to provide support, but the lack of communication and resources from the federal government makes it difficult to effectively address the needs of those affected. The situation is particularly challenging in rugged areas like Jacumba, where extreme temperatures and limited resources add to the hardships faced by migrants. The situation is uncertain and could last for an extended period of time, making sustained support essential. It's important to remember that the people affected are not "demonized others," but rather vulnerable individuals, including families and children, who deserve compassionate treatment. The federal government's actions, which may include deliberate stalling tactics, are causing unnecessary suffering.

    • Responding to the Humanitarian Crisis at the US-Mexico BorderOrganizations provide essentials to migrants while advocating for government support, but resources are stretched due to lack of coordination and federal assistance.

      The American French Service Committee and various organizations have been responding to the humanitarian crisis at the US-Mexico border by setting up support stations for migrants, providing essentials like food, water, medical aid, and charging phones. They've learned from past experiences and have been advocating for elected officials to take action. However, they've faced challenges in getting government support and coordination, which has stretched their resources. The situation is a result of years of prioritizing enforcement, militarization, and cruel deterrence over humanitarian needs and rights. Despite these challenges, these organizations continue to provide aid and lift up the dignity of those suffering under inhumane conditions. Elected officials, particularly at the local and state levels, have shown more support, but federal support has been lacking.

    • Contentious responsibility for addressing migrant needs at the borderDespite resources, lack of clear action and provision of services leaves migrants in dire circumstances, with limited access to basic necessities due to prioritization of enforcement and criminalization over aid.

      The responsibility for addressing the needs of migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border is a contentious issue between border patrol and local authorities, resulting in a lack of clear action and provision of services. This situation is further complicated by the large sums of money being spent on enforcement and criminalization rather than direct aid, despite the availability of resources. The public perception and media coverage of the crisis have waned since the end of Title 42, leading to a lack of attention and funding. Additionally, there is a deliberate management of the PR surrounding the situation, with claims that camps have been cleared when in reality, people are still arriving and in need of assistance. Overall, the systemic issues and lack of coordinated effort are leaving migrants in dire circumstances, with limited access to basic necessities.

    • Discussing Support for Hakumba, TexasSupport organizations like Border Kindness and American Friends Service Committee with donations to provide essential items in bulk. Volunteer through proper channels and be prepared for emotional demands. Ensure help does not negatively impact those in need and vetting process is in place. Small donations make a big difference.

      While the situation in Hakumba, Texas, may be improving according to reports, there are still people in need who are not receiving adequate assistance. The discussion emphasized the importance of supporting organizations like Border Kindness and American Friends Service Committee with monetary donations, as these resources allow for the purchase of essential items in bulk. Volunteering is also an option, but it's crucial to go through the proper channels and be prepared for the emotional demands of the situation. The speakers stressed the importance of ensuring that help does not negatively impact those in need and that there is a vetting process in place. Both organizations provided contact information for those interested in donating or volunteering. The conversation also highlighted the need for financial support, with even small donations making a significant impact.

    • Advocating for Asylum SeekersIndividuals can make a difference by contacting local authorities and engaging with organizations to support asylum seekers. Seeking asylum is a legal right being violated, and organizations like Border Kindness and Miles for Migrants can help facilitate travel and donate air miles.

      Individuals can make a difference by advocating for support from local authorities and engaging with organizations to help those in need of asylum. Making phone calls instead of just emailing can be more effective. It's important to remember that seeking asylum is a legally protected right, which is being violated by the government. For those interested in helping, organizations like Border Kindness and Miles for Migrants are good places to start. These organizations can help facilitate travel for individuals after they've been paroled into the US, and donating air miles is a valuable way to contribute. Staying informed through social media and podcasts is also crucial to understanding the situation and how to help.

    Recent Episodes from Behind the Bastards

    Part Two: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Part Two: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Robert killed a man in Reno, just to watch him die. Also he concludes the story of the murder of the Chagos Islands by the U.S. and the ailing British Empire. With bonus Dog Genocide!

     

    Behind the Bastards is doing it's annual fundraiser for the Portland Diaper Bank! We had a soft start a week or so ago but will actually be plugging it this week and next. Please help if you can!

    https://www.gofundme.com/f/btb-fundraiser-pdx-diaper-bank?attribution_id=sl:a1a2d058-9511-435e-ab61-93bc1252ffa5&utm_campaign=pd_ss_icons&utm_medium=customer&utm_source=twitter 

    Sources:

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/02/15/thats-when-nightmare-started/uk-and-us-forced-displacement-chagossians-and

    https://archive.is/KvGqw#selection-1769.0-1781.535

    Vine, David. Island of Shame: The Secret History of the U.S. Military Base on Diego Garcia (p. 18). Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/2/25/how-britain-forcefully-depopulated-a-whole-archipelago/

    https://archive.org/details/webofdeceitbrita0000curt/page/432/mode/2up?q=chagos

    https://journals.openedition.org/oceanindien/2003

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Behind the Bastards
    enJune 20, 2024

    Part One: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Part One: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Robert welcomes Andrew Ti back to the show to tell the story of the Chagos Islands, a paradise founded by former slaves that was wiped out by the British empire so they could lease it to the U.S. as an air base.

    (2 Part Series)

    Behind the Bastards is doing it's annual fundraiser for the Portland Diaper Bank! We had a soft start a week or so ago but will actually be plugging it this week and next. Please help if you can!

    https://www.gofundme.com/f/btb-fundraiser-pdx-diaper-bank?attribution_id=sl:a1a2d058-9511-435e-ab61-93bc1252ffa5&utm_campaign=pd_ss_icons&utm_medium=customer&utm_source=twitter 

    Sources:

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/02/15/thats-when-nightmare-started/uk-and-us-forced-displacement-chagossians-and

    https://archive.is/KvGqw#selection-1769.0-1781.535

    Vine, David. Island of Shame: The Secret History of the U.S. Military Base on Diego Garcia (p. 18). Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/2/25/how-britain-forcefully-depopulated-a-whole-archipelago/

    https://archive.org/details/webofdeceitbrita0000curt/page/432/mode/2up?q=chagos

    https://journals.openedition.org/oceanindien/2003

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Behind the Bastards
    enJune 18, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Why Saying “I’m Sorry” Isn’t Enough and What to Say or Do Instead Episode 105

    Why Saying “I’m Sorry” Isn’t Enough and What to Say or Do Instead Episode 105

    “I said I’m sorry, can’t we just move past this?” Is this a statement that you hear from your partner, or even one that you have said to them before? It most likely is and for some reason saying “I’m sorry” just doesn’t seem to cut it to resolve a conflict all the way and reconnect you both. Any idea why this is or what you can say (or do) instead?

    Well that is exactly what we are going to cover this episode today, as “I’m sorry” on its own is just not enough. During this episode you will hear the 7 reasons why it’s not enough, we will share our story of moving (yes we are still waiting on the trucking company over a week later) and how “sorry” was not enough for us, and then the first two steps of the “5 R Process” to being to reconcile and connect with your partner. 

     

    About Us:

    We’re The Freemans, your go-to couple for authentic and actionable relationship advice. Send us your relationship questions for the show with a DM on Instagram. As you listen to the episode, tag us on an IG story and let us know what you loved. 

     

    Resources For Your Relationship:

    1. Pre-order our newest book, The Argument Hangover, and get over $200 of free bonus gifts (like the mini course)!
    2. Book a Relationship Breakthrough Session (only $97 to hold your spot)