Invest like a Congress member (Encore)

Hey, indicated listeners, Darien Woods here. This week, we are running our favorite episodes of the year. Today's episode explores how Democratic and Republican members of Congress invest, and whether they're any good at it. We'll have a small update for you at the end. NPR. This is the indicator from Planet Money. I'm Waylon Wong.

And I die in woods. And we have NPR's congressional correspondent, Deirdre Walsh, with us today. She's dialing in from the House of Representatives. Hi, Deirdre.

Hey there. Deirdre, the stock market is on a tear right now. And you reported this story that caught our attention about a company that partnered with the financial firm, Subversive, to allow everyday people to invest like members of Congress. Right. So this was initially created by a trader who calls himself unusual whales. Love the name. He has created two separate ETFs. Exchange traded funds. Right. That are modeled on the trades by members of Congress.

So he's using publicly available forms, disclosure forms by these lawmakers, or their spouses and dependent children's trades, to model one ETF called Nance, which is modeled on Democratic lawmakers' trades, named after former speaker Nancy Pelosi. So casual, Nance. And another ETF called Cruz after Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz. Very good. To show how the two different

parties, investment strategies are working in the market. Darian, today on the show, you and I are going to invest in these two exchange traded funds, as in, these funds that track a range of different companies. One of us will go with Nance, comprising companies held by Democratic members of Congress, and the other will go the cruise direction, companies held by Republicans. And as we do this, we'll also consider whether politicians should even be allowed to play the market. So dear to how do you think we're going to do?

I think you're going to do really well based on the past experience of these funds. Well, fast performance is no indication of future performance. You know, I think we're going to get rich, Darien. If you can't beat him, join him.

This message comes from Wyze, the app for doing things in other currencies. Send, spend, or receive money internationally, and always get the real-time mid-market exchange rate with no hidden fees. Download the Wyze app today or visit Wyze.com. Teason sees apply. Support for NPR comes from Amazon Music. Prime members have access to a catalog of news podcasts, ad-free breaking news without the breaks, available by downloading the Amazon Music app or visiting amazon.com slash ad-free.

On the latest NPR Politics podcast, we look back on the life and legacy of Jimmy Carter. The former president died Sunday at the age of 100. And unlike other presidents, his accomplishments after leaving the Oval Office are arguably what most define his story. Listen to our remembrance of the 39th president on the NPR Politics podcast.

What's in store for the music, TV, and film industries for 2025? We don't know, but we're making some fun bold predictions for the new year. Listen now to the pop culture happy hour podcast from NPR. All right, so Whelan, I now have here the Planet Money Investment Fund.

It's a very sophisticated jar. Oh, there's actually stuff in it, because, you know, the Planet Money stock trading experiments have not got that well in the past, let's just say. Yeah, the origin was in 2010 when the Planet Money team bought a toxic asset. Needless to say, that didn't go so well.

Okay, should we count out how much we have to fritter away on this new experiment we're doing? This and this. We have 50, 60, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77 dollars. And I said quarter and

Time. Nice. $77.35. That's a great amount of capital to start with. Now, this should be enough to buy these exchange traded funds that are based on Congress members trading. As we're taping now, one share of NANTS or NANC is going for a little over $35 a share.

And then crews with a K, K-R-U-Z, it is almost $30. So we'll each buy one share and we'll check back in a week to see how we did. Wait, Whalen, what did we actually invest in? Yeah, so I'm just taking a scroll through this portfolio. I'm looking at what's in the cruise ETF and the biggest category of holdings is actually oil and gas. So almost 11% of the cruise ETF is in oil, gas and consumable fuels.

I'm going to look at the Democratic one on the N-A-N-C, now it's ETF. I'm seeing oil, gas and consumable fuels is actually 0.65%. So basically zero. Really, that's 100%. Oh, gosh. Very little. What about software? Yeah, minus 6.2%. Minus 17.5%. So you're a Democratic, Congress people love software, but Republicans less so. Oh, that's really interesting.

Yeah, and on the Dems list, I also see pharmaceuticals, retail, insurance. Yeah, same here. Investments all over the economy. Well, I'm feeling good about my investment because the trading based on Democratic lawmakers and their families is up 20% in the year to mid-June. And that's about 5 percentage points more than the S&P 500, which is a reasonable proxy for the overall US stock market.

Cruz hasn't done as well. Those Republican lawmakers' trades are on average up only 9%, not as good as the stock market as a whole. But regardless, this raises the question of whether politicians are using inside information to profit from the stock market.

Yeah, Josh Graham Lynn is the CEO and co-founder of Represent Us, which is an anti-corruption advocacy group. And he does not like the status quo. Members of Congress who are serving the American people simply shouldn't be in a position to trade individual stocks.

Josh supports a bill to ban this trading. This one is called the ending trading and holdings in congressional stocks act or the ethics act. Now, Josh is okay with members of Congress investing in funds where they're tracking an overall rise in the market. Just not trading individual companies.

I don't think anybody wants to limit members of Congress from making investments and having a positive retirement ahead of them. It's when there's a perception of conflict of interest or perception of insider trading. That's what's really damaging to both Congress's credibility and the American people's trust in our political system. Just 16% of Americans surveyed by the Pew Research Center say they trust the government to do what's right just about always or most of the time.

Oh geez, that's really low, 16%. Not so good. And with the stock trading they're doing, it would be good to know the reality. Like, are politicians systemically making outsized gains on their stock trading? Short answer is no, absolutely not. Bruce Sessadot is a professor of economics at Dartmouth College. And he and his co-authors tallied all the congressional trades from 2012 to late 2020.

On average, they do average. You know, stuff that they sell sometimes goes up, stuff that they buy goes up down. And in our paper, they, as a group, underperform. Bruce is not saying corruption in regards to trading never occurs. It just doesn't appear to be systemic. He finds even the top 1% of traders don't look any different from stocks randomly picked, like the proverbial monkeys throwing darts at a dartboard.

Now, Bruce didn't test monkeys with darts, but he did test reindeer. Actual reindeer? Yes. Bruce and his college student go up and did some further research where they literally went to a Christmas-style theme park called Santa's Village, and they got reindeer to pick stocks by walking on pages of the Wall Street Journal. So they used the point of the hoft to decide which stock they were buying.

Well, you actually did this. I was reading the paper and I wasn't sure if this was just a Christmas parody, but you actually got the reindeers to fix stocks. Absolutely. And, you know, some of my favorite parts of the paper where we point out that they exhibit hurting behavior and that they're good at sniffing out new trends.

Bruce does say there's a serious point here. The reindeer outperformed the congresspeople and the senators on average, especially in a finite time horizon, and a couple of good picks dominate everything. And that point might carry over to the recent conversations about congressional leaders doing so well, because you have this idea that, well, maybe Nancy Pelosi is really killing it in Nvidia and other tech stocks.

But you have to ask yourself, okay, is that really inside information? Or is it that she represents a district that has a lot of tech companies? And when tech companies are doing well, she and her husband, Paul, are doing well. So we asked Josh, the advocate for bans on congressional stock trading, whether this kind of evidence made him rethink his position. I don't think so. I mean, think of it this way. If you had an NBA player who was bad at rigging the rules in favor of their team, would you still let them rig the rules in favor of their team? Of course not.

Maybe this ethics bill would protect Congress people from their own bad stock picks.

It's been six months since we made this episode, and now for the results of our experiment. Nance, or Nancy, outperformed Cruz. Nance grew at a higher rate, bringing in $4.56. Cruz brought in $2.77. Both did worse than the S&P 500 index. Our after-tax gains will be transferred over to the Planet Money Investment Fund. Now,

This episode was produced by Julia Ritchie with engineering by Quacey Lee. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Kaking Cannon edits the show and the indicator is a production of NPR.

Oh my goodness, if I could get a reindeer, that would be nice. I'm Jesse Thorne, celebrate the season with me and certified reindeer lover Jennifer Hudson on the Bullseye Holiday Special. Plus, we'll hear from Tower of Power, Zach Cherry and Judy Greer on the Bullseye podcast from maximumfund.org and NPR.

It's been a great year for TV, movies, and music, and we are highlighting the best of the best. We're talking about our favorite moments of the year, including some of the best pop culture you might have missed. Listen now to the Pop Culture Happy Hour podcast from NPR.

Hey, it's Peter Saggle, the Hosted Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me. Now, if you like Wait, Wait, and you're looking for another podcast where the hosts take self-deprecating jabs at themselves and invite important guests on who have no business being there, then you should check out NPR's How to Do Everything. It's hosted by two of the minds behind Wait, Wait, who literally sometimes put words in my mouth. Find the How to Do Everything podcast wherever you are currently listening to me go on about it.