If Netflix can't make live work, can anyone?

Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of the Bullet Journal Method. I'm your friend David Pierce, and I am sitting here on a weekday buying candy on TikTok. Like, I don't know how this happened, but suddenly my algorithm is just absolutely overrun by freeze-dried skittles, which are a thing you can buy. And there's like a sour-coated gusher's thing that everybody's really excited about. But the biggest thing that's happening all over TikTok

is Swedish candy. There are these things called bugs. There are little skulls that are massively popular. People are so excited about them. They sell out like crazy. There's this company called Bon Bon that has absolutely blown up on TikTok. There's something happening inside of Candy Talk. And I can't figure out what it is. I can't figure out how it works, where all these companies and people are getting this candy from and repackaging it and selling it to people.

But I'm now deep down this rabbit hole. I bought candy on a TikTok live stream last night while I was walking my dog. It's a real thing that happened. And I bought it on the stream. And the guy was like, oh, David, thanks for your order. I'm going to give you extra sour powder because you ordered on the live stream. And I was like really excited for a long time that this was a thing that had happened to me. It's coming in two to four days, apparently.

Is it anything? Is it food? Did I order it from an actual company? I literally have no idea. That's the TikTok shop. But it's possible there is going to be an alarming amount of candy coming to my house very soon. And frankly, that's great news. Anyway, we are not here to talk about candy. I have a feeling I will be talking more about candy over time, but not today. Today we're going to do two things. First, we're going to talk about the Jake Paul Mike Tyson fight on Netflix.

I don't really care about the fight, but I care a lot about what it means, that Netflix had this massively popular event. And it didn't go great. And Netflix has some more massively popular events about to happen. And we're also just at a really interesting moment in the sports streaming world, where if Netflix can't do it,

Can anyone? We're going to talk about it. Also, I'm going to talk to Roland Allen, who wrote a book about the history of notebooks. And actually, what he wrote is a history of civilization told through the notebook. He makes a really fun case for why pen and paper has been so important in history, why it's so important now, and why even in an increasingly digital world, writing things down in a notebook is not going away.

Super fun. We also have a hotline question that we're going to get into that sent or producer will pour down kind of a wild rabbit hole of, again, the TikTok shop. It's a weird world out there. All that is coming up in just a second. But first, I've now been staring at these freeze dried skittles for too long and I'm going to buy them. Wish me luck. This is the VergeCast. We'll be right back.

Support for the Vergecast comes from Polestar. Polestar is an electric performance car brand focused on innovation for both cutting-edge technology and design. Nothing exemplifies this better than Polestar 3, their luxury electric SUV.

It features an aerodynamic exterior and a Scandinavian minimalist interior. So if you're a driver who doesn't want to choose between having an electric vehicle and the agility of a sports car, then this might be the car for you. Experience it for yourself at your local Polestar space, book a test drive at Polestar.com.

Welcome back. All right. So Friday night, Jake Paul, Mike Tyson, it both was and was not the fight of the year. I don't know anything or particularly care about boxing, if I'm completely honest with you. But the thing I heard from everybody is that actually the undercard, all the fights that were before the main fight was great. Lots of good fights. But then Jake Paul versus Mike Tyson,

I mean, it was like a YouTuber versus a man in his late 50s. I don't really know what anybody expected, but that is the fight that we got. Anyway, I think the more interesting story here has less to do with that fight itself and more to do with how things went on Netflix and what it says about what Netflix is ready for as it tries to take over live TV and what the whole streaming industry is ready for.

Lots to talk about. There's lots of this stuff left to come. The tests keep coming for these companies. So figured it was a good time to check in and nobody better to do it with than Richard Lawler. Richard, hello. Hey, I just saw you the other day. This was very exciting. We were in person and you understood that I exist outside this room? I did. It's useful to be reminded of that every once in a while, but not like for too long. I think we got about the right amount of time near each other. This is good. Yeah.

All right, so first question, did you watch the fight on Friday? I did not watch the fight because doing anything else was a better choice. Yeah, I mean, I would say as it turns out, that is largely correct. It is a real bummer that this whole thing was not about a sport. I enjoy it more than boxing between YouTubers and old men, but alas, here we are. And I said on social media, if I wanted to see a YouTuber fight an old man, I would just go punch a YouTuber.

I can put that fight on myself right now. It's a beautiful thing. If you walk outside, I'm sure someone is filming a TikTok and you can just punch them in the face. And here we are. And apparently 60 million people will watch it if you do. But I think the reason I wanted to talk to you about this is we've talked a lot over the last couple of years about

Basically, the question is streaming ready for sports. And it's been, it's been coming. It's been happening. Amazon is kind of making it work with football, but like the NFL is, is the thing, right? And every streaming platform, once the NFL, a bunch of them have gotten it. Netflix is going to have it on Christmas day. And I think to me, the single most surprising thing that happened this weekend was that Netflix was not ready for this fight.

You think they would have been, right? They have the data. They know how many customers they had. They know how many people were interested in this fight. They know how heavily they promoted it. They know there wasn't really anything else to do on Friday night. It felt like and still they were surprised somehow. They just weren't ready for the moment. Yeah. And am I crazy for thinking that if anyone should be able to do this just from a pure technical deliver the bits in high quality to people perspective, it ought to be Netflix.

You'd think so, but delivering things live is very different. And I think that's what we found basically every time there's a massive event. And every time we've had these Super Bowls streaming now for years, they've been available on the internet. Each and every time it's just a little bit glitchier than you'd expect, even though they know how many people are going to tune in because it's hard, because delivering these things with milliseconds and just fractions of a second of delay is difficult. Like you can cash

streams and videos. And if you have a new series, you can put your little devices in every, everyone's nearby ISP and you can put it very close to them and have it preloaded. You can't do that with live. It just doesn't work. Yeah. And it's starting to make me wonder if it is.

Technically speaking, right now, just an unsolvable problem. Because like you said, I think if you got rewind of ways, like Game of Thrones had streaming issues. And there were a bunch of ways that these companies could and did solve them, right? And like you don't hear that anymore from these sort of big event HBO style shows anymore. Like everybody logged onto HBO at nine o'clock on a Sunday night and couldn't watch their show. I have not heard that in years. We just fixed that.

But there is something about trying to do this live and just literally like the physical infrastructure of making all of that happen that we're very good at with linear television and they've been doing it for decades and they have trucks and it's a whole thing. And I'm starting to wonder if we just haven't developed the over the internet pieces of this in such a way that it's going to work.

I think the main issue is just that the internet wasn't made to work like that. And we're kind of tacking things on and we're creating these solutions to work around a problem that the internet was never designed to solve. Something we talked about last year, but that still hasn't really arisen is L4S, which was supposed to help to laden the issue so that when you send a packet and it really needs to get to someone one on time that is the first one to get there. And there are so many other strategies that I think these companies have done to try and make sure that when people are streaming, it's not getting bogged down. It's not getting clogged at the various choke points.

But it still does. You've got how many different devices, you've got how many different bit rates, you've got how many different encodings and DRM protection and all of these other things that you're putting on top of this that make it that much harder to stream a live event. And it's just not a problem that we solved it. And I guess on Christmas day, we're going to get another opportunity to see how close Netflix is.

Yeah, well, I think I've been making fun of Netflix for like 48 hours now because they put out that statement on Saturday that was basically like, we think we did a great job after a whole evening and day of people online being like, this looks awful.

I can't see anything. This is just like a 1980s pixelated monstrosity of a picture. And then Netflix is like, you know what? We did it. And I've kind of come around for all the reasons that you're saying, I'm like, honestly, maybe this is literally the best Netflix could have done. And to some extent, that might be more alarming as we think about where we're going. But maybe Netflix is not out of its mind to think it actually did this about as well as it could have.

I can definitely see why they would have that perspective. What's interesting is like I'm hearing from people over, you know, I was watching a stream of someone pointing their phone at the TV on TikTok and live streaming it because the Netflix stream was 45 minutes behind. Right. And so it's like it can be done. You can get live video that people actually watch as long as, you know, 60 million people aren't tuning into this particular stream at the moment.

Yeah, there is a there is a magic number at which it all kind of falls apart. And I'm very curious. This is part of the reason I'm interested in these Christmas football games because Netflix has these two games on Christmas for the first time. They're both actually going to be really good games as it turns out. They're they're like some of the best teams in the NFL. It's going to be very exciting. It's Christmas Day. Lots of people are going to watch.

It seems unlikely that it's going to be 60 million people on either game. But like, let's say it's, let's say it's 30. We're going to get such an interesting test case of at what point have we just hit the capacity of all of this infrastructure? And there's also just not that much time, like Netflix can't fix the internet between now and Christmas day. So to some extent,

I assume there will be lots of things that can learn, but it's not like it can rebuild its whole data delivery system between now and Christmas in order to get these football games right. So I feel like we're going to get a totally different but very similar test. And I think that's a big part of it is just that you aren't dealing with just one problem or just one problem in just one place. You have many people in many different places.

You have different issues. You have, oh, the network's bad here. Or we don't have the back end node connecting close enough to this many people who are all trying to stream it. You have different kinds of demand in different places. What if it's good in most places, but it's not good in Baltimore, like Baltimore's playing away at this Texans game. And if it's just bad in one city, that is millions of people who are going to be very upset with Netflix, Beyonce fans.

Not always, if you are going to cause problems for them to watch, their favorite could be an issue. We're gonna find out what happens. Yeah, so speaking of Beyonce, let's talk about this, because the news on Monday was that Beyonce is going to be doing the halftime show at one of these games. Yes, at the second game, between the Ravens and the Texans. Because in Houston, she's from Houston Natural Center. That makes sense. But it's Beyonce, right? I would say in terms of who you could announce as your halftime performer,

That's about as big as it gets, right? Like that's, it's Beyonce. And so to me, it's like, if you've ever wondered how serious Netflix is about doing this, Beyonce is the answer, right? Like this, this company is not kidding. And I think Jake Paul and Mike Tyson, you can be like, oh, this is like,

slightly interesting, but also like slightly silliness. Two football games is like cool, but whatever, but like it's, it's Beyonce, Richard, they got Beyonce. There are millions of people who will not miss that. This is probably their first time to be able to see the songs off of her new album. It just, there are a lot of things that are lining up. They are going to be ready. They're going to be prepared for this. And Netflix has to deliver.

What do you make of this from Netflix? Netflix is clearly like all in now on sports after you and I have spent years on this show talking about how Netflix was very happy to not be in live sports. They did the drive to survive thing. They were like, we're going to make this sort of ancillary content around games. We don't need to compete in this. Netflix has been saying this.

It feels like this company has done a total 180 and is now like we have to figure out how to do live. And that means sports. Does this make sense to you? The thing I'm not sure about is how far they'll go into life because I think that it leads in one way. It kind of serves them. How do we keep people from not canceling Netflix? And one of the answers is we have a huge event every few months so that every time you start thinking, man, you know what? I haven't watched Netflix in a while. Do I still need the subscription? Then Beyonce is on there and you're like, yeah, cancel yet. Fair.

That gives me, yeah, that's true. You need to basically have one of those at least announced every month so that I'm like, OK, well, I'll keep it until then. And then the day after Christmas, they're going to announce the next thing for February or whatever. And then that'll be that.

We grew up with HBO in Showtime playing this game with boxing, with music, with all of these things, our entire lives going up in the 90s. It's the same playable. You know what you just made me realize is they're definitely going to announce the stranger things debut of some kind the day after Christmas. And that's going to, that's, that's how we get there for sure. Yeah. It just rolls it in on itself. Yeah, exactly. Do you think Netflix has moves in sports here? Like, is this, are you at all as a sports fan interested in what's coming here?

Not really. I wonder what they can do, but they have enough money that it kind of doesn't matter because they can get enough events if they can sign up, say, the NBA Cup or whoever. If they have enough money, people will create events for them to host.

Jake Paul versus Mike Tyson. They said, how can we get generation Z, generation X and millennials all to watch the same thing at the same time? Got it. And they'll just find something else. They will create something. They tried the hot dog competition. I don't think that really attracted all that much attention that seemed to go off pretty well without glitches. Their reality show was the first one that had huge problems. And I think they did the comedy thing that didn't work all that well.

But, you know, it's been kind of up and down. So it's hard to have these hits, but they're just going to keep looking. They're going to keep digging in there. They've got the checkbook ready to spin. Clearly. And I think the thing I've been trying to figure out is whether I want one of these streaming services to really try and reinvent the wheel. Because I think like you look at Amazon, which has been doing Thursday Night Football for a couple of years now,

It just is football. Amazon has a couple of interesting stats ideas, but they're even doing that in a sponsored way on other networks. That's just a whole separate thing. It's Al Michaels. It is the most straightforward-down-the-middle-old-school football game.

We haven't seen a Netflix football game, but I would assume it's going to be very much the same thing. Peacock is now streaming Sunday night football, but it's just taking a TV streaming and turning it into streaming. So part of me is like, somebody needs to take this and like blow up the whole concept of what it might be and give us new ways of looking at stuff and change the cameras and make it more interactive and whatever else YouTube with Sunday ticket. Another example, like YouTube Sunday ticket is just Sunday ticket. Just Sunday.

a ticket and that's fine. But it's part of me is like, what's the next thing? And then the other part of me is like, well, maybe let's spend our time making sure the thing works and then give it a few years and we'll worry about actually putting this out there. I think that that is the big question here because what I think what people want is not personalization. It is the same thing but better because that's one thing that has been pushed out there. Oh, you'll be able to get your personalized stream. You'll be able to get exactly what you want. Maybe you'll be able to tune into whatever camera you want.

But what works better is when we're all watching the same thing at the same time, like Paul versus Tyson, which creates a spectacle, which creates a, I can't miss this. And it's not personal. It's together. And that is better. And you don't need like a fake auditorium of people. You just need an event that people want to watch. You don't need avatars. You don't need 3D. You don't need any of those things. You don't even need a good fight. What you're saying is if you had picked the other camera, you wouldn't have seen Mike Tyson's bare ass. And that would have been a problem for you.

We could have all avoided that. It just would have been a choice if we had all been able to avoid that. But apparently that wasn't what the people voted for. 60 million people went the other way. So we are wrong. Netflix knows what people want, Richard. Let's be honest with each other. That was not. I have the analytics. My conspiracy theory says that was completely deliberate and it is just to juice views. You got to get them how you can. This is the world we live in, Richard. It's fine. Next version, guys, is going to be very interesting.

Listen, it's, it's Q four. I'll do what I got to do. Uh, so how do you feel in as a, as a streaming sports fan right now? This is like, this is a fun time to do this cause we're, we're in the middle of the NBA season. We're in the middle of the NFL season. The NHL has started college basketball is going college football is peaking. It's like this is the best part of the year. If all you want to watch is sports. Uh,

And yet I feel like my sports watching life is more chaotic and more expensive than ever. I tried to watch the Bill's Chiefs game on Sunday night and literally couldn't. I went through 10 services and I was like, oh, I just don't have this game somehow. And I feel like you feel my pain on this as somebody who also likes to watch esoteric sports that you're not allowed to watch.

That is the greatest thing. Like, oh, your team is playing. You pay for maybe three packages already to watch this particular sport. And you find out, wait, I don't have the one that has this game still somehow. I'm maybe better than last year because the local monopoly that controls piston streaming, they're still bad. They're still monopoly. They're named after a different gambling company now. But at least it works. So when I give them my money to watch the pistons, I can actually watch the game sometimes.

And then I'm paying for League Pass and I'm paying for my local team subscription. But then if the game is on national TV on ESPN, if I'm not paying for a cable package, can't get it, or I can't get the good TNT stream, I can get the League Pass TNT stream with no announcers and whatnot.

And it's just like, wait, how is this better than cable? Because I used to just have cable and it was like, OK, so I pay this much and I know that I will be able to see the game. Maybe it'll be on a different channel or whatever. But I will be able to turn on my TV and the game will come in. I don't have to log in and log out and have glitches and have the same ad three times a row.

Yeah, I remember years ago having sort of the mental rubric of like, OK, if it's a good game, it's going to be on this channel. If it's a game, it's going to be on this channel. And if literally no one cares because both teams are trash, they'll just put it over here. And I knew the number of all of those channels. And so I could find the game in 30 seconds, no matter what. And now it's literally like I went on. I went. I was on slinging, watching Red Zone, because slings still has Red Zone for reasons I don't completely understand.

I sling doesn't have CBS. So when Red Zone only got down to one game, I didn't have it there anymore. I went to YouTube TV, which had it, but my access had turned off because I forgot to pay it. That one's probably on me.

But then I went over to every streaming service I could think of being like, which one has CBS? And by the time I realized it was Paramount Plus, which sure, that's the one with CBS, uh, I had it was over and I had to go in and find my Paramount Plus password because who uses Paramount Plus? And it was just a hold and I was like, I will pay you just to watch the last five minutes of this game. I couldn't do it. Wouldn't, wouldn't let me devastating. And as I said, back in the day, I just knew three channel numbers. That was all I needed to know. I didn't have to figure a whole bunch of things out.

Yeah. Do you have any sense of whether this is going to get better? You and I haven't talked about venue sports in a while, this supposed, like, smushing together of all these different companies rights. Well, that depends on what happens on the courts, if they ever actually get to lunch or whatever they do, or if it would be any good, if it actually did exist, which will we ever find out? If we do not know.

Also, I think there's some interesting things going on because Amazon, for example, like with the NBA, I think in 2025 could be very interesting because Amazon is going to have a lot of NBA games directly. They also own a share of the

whatever it's called now, fan-dual sports networks that have some of these local broadcast rights in my area, has the local broadcast rights. So maybe they can package it together so I can just use one app to watch most of the games. Unfortunately, the Pistons might be good and then they'll be on national TV and I'll have to pay even more to watch more games. So just problems on top of problems. Well, at that point, then you have to pay for ESPN's

multitude of streaming services. It's part of venue. It has ESPN plus is the what's called flagship, right? That's the thing that's supposed to just be ESPN on the internet. That's supposedly launching next year. Like in a funny way, we were having conversations a few years ago about how

A bunch of really old rights deals were slowing everything down, right? Because they had all been signed a decade ago. They were, they were really focused on broadcast TV in particular. And so the idea that this stuff could be streamed and available widely didn't really exist. Now it feels like basically all of those deals have turned over. I think the NBA is probably the last one to turn over and that starts next year.

big streaming shifts. Like you said, Amazon's a big player now. A lot of stuff is moving to ESPN, which is doing a lot of streaming stuff. And now it feels like the hold up is the platforms, which can't figure out how to launch. They can't figure out what they're supposed to charge. They can't figure out how to serve this stuff to this many people. Like we should be in a moment where some streamer is like, we are going to exclusively stream the Super Bowl and it's going to be fine. Netflix should be able to do that. There are more people in America who have Netflix than anything else.

Like this should be possible and yet it isn't and everyone knows it's not possible. So we're in a weird moment now where the problem we used to have is no longer the problem and it's making very obvious this new problem that we have, which is that none of the platforms are ready for this.

It turns out that the problem is money and certain companies have lots of it and they're willing to spend it. So the leagues are going to chase it and however they can. And what the leagues have found is that playing the networks off of each other or now the platforms off of each other and the networks and the various intermingling of those is the way to get the highest bids to make the most money. And so now we're in for another 10 years or so of switching and swapping between apps. I really hate

how aggressively I'm starting to root for Amazon. Because I think you're right that Amazon has this big idea of being like the one that puts it all together. And I think in theory, ESPN wants to be that and is doing some interesting stuff along those lines. But Disney just doesn't have the money to do that. But basically like the companies that could just buy all the sports rights,

It's just kind of Amazon and Apple and Apple. I don't think is is interested in playing that particular sports game. But Amazon, like it could get as much as it wants, right? Like it can afford all of it. And so they have the scale. They also have the skills delivered as bad as their apps tend to be. They can actually deliver a live stream and AWS does exist. Yeah, there's a football works. It's not as big as these. Like I would be interested to see

60 million people try to watch Prime Video. Again, there is a matter of scale that we just haven't seen on streaming work anywhere yet. But yeah, I feel like if someone were going to give us the dream back, it's probably going to be Amazon, which I hate saying that out loud. Even just that, that felt bad that I'm like, gosh, I hope Amazon wins TV because that would be terrific.

But it kind of feels like it. That's how dark the future has gotten. We're looking at Amazon and save us. Yeah. Andy Jassy, it's all up to you.

Oh, brother. So what, what have you seen this year that gives you hope? Let's end on a high note here. I want to just say, we haven't talked about this on the show in a long time. I thought peacock crushed the Olympics. When it comes to sports streaming, the thing that I was like, okay, internet sports TV is going to be cool. Was peacock in the Olympics? All the sports, all the different ways to navigate it. They had the gold zone thing. They had the prime time thing, like.

That was great. And I don't know how replicable that is for other sports, but like that to me was when it was like, okay, the streaming out of sports might be great.

It was there. It worked. The streams were consistent. The quality was high. I didn't feel like I was way behind. I didn't have to feel like I had to watch a bunch of things that I didn't want to. I got a lot. There were some things that could have been better. I felt like when you were navigating through archived events, when you wanted to watch something that already aired, it was harder than it needed to be. But I felt like they also made some concessions, perhaps, to make the viewing experience a little bit better. If you jumped out of something and you jump back in,

Okay, so that doesn't play just again the way that we've seen in previous years and on other platforms.

I think there's some push and pull because I understand, hey, this platform needs to make money from this event. Got it. But I just want to watch it. I paid for it. I would like to watch it. Give me that. And they kind of cross that bar. And that's where everyone else should be aiming at the minimum. You're a simple man of simple needs, for sure. Show me the thing that I have clicked on, please. Yes. Fair enough. All right. Richard, thank you as always. Thank you.

Alright, we gotta take a break, and then we're gonna come back, and we're gonna talk about notebooks. We'll be right back. Support for the Vergecast comes from Polestar. Polestar is looking to usher in a new generation of electric SUVs. One that relies on technology so integrated, you forget it's even there. And they're starting with Polestar 3, their luxury electric SUV.

Polestar 3 features an aerodynamic exterior and a Scandinavian minimalist interior. It has the ability to go from 0 to 60 in as little as 4.8 seconds and get an EPA-estimated range of up to 315 miles per charge. Polestar 3 even lets you optimize the powertrain between performance or range mode depending on your drive's needs. You could also say goodbye to that cluttered dashboard because this car shows you everything you want to know and nothing you don't.

You can even have Google turn on your favorite podcast, we're hoping it's this one, and be immersed in 3D surround sound by Bowers and Wilkins. Polestar 3 has a lot to offer, so if you're a driver who doesn't want to choose between spacious comfort and the agile handling of a sports car, then this might be the car for you. You can test it out for yourself at your local Polestar space. Book a test drive for Polestar 3 at Polestar.com.

Welcome back. So a few weeks ago, I started reading this book called The Notebook, A History of Thinking on Paper. It's by a guy named Roland Allen, and it traces like a thousand years of history of how people write on paper. He makes this big case that paper

is this incredibly critical invention in the history of the world and that actually without paper, without notebooks, we wouldn't have modern capitalism, we wouldn't know nearly as much about history as we do, that actually a lot of the world that we live in is defined by the way that people wrote stuff down and what they wrote stuff down on. He tells a whole history of notebooks all the way through the Renaissance and all the way up to now and even in the future.

If you listen to the show, you know that I love note-taking apps. I love thinking about how people write stuff down. I think the systems for all this are fascinating. And this book was like catnip for me. So I asked Roland to come on the show and talk through some of the big ideas in his book and also why

Notebooks continue to survive in this increasingly digital world. It's a super fun conversation. I really enjoyed talking to him. And yes, there is more 12th century history in this episode than most, but we're going to go with it. So to start with Roland, I asked him to quickly recap the case that he makes that paper is a hugely important invention in the history of the world and that without paper, we might not have any of this. Here's what he said to that.

Yeah, permanence is really why. For thousands of years, we've had different ways of writing things down as human beings. So you go back to, you can carve on stone. You can make little dents in clay tablets, which you then fire and dry out and they're permanent, but they are clay tablets. So they're not super portable or practical or robust. Then you have papyrus, papyrus, the reed product, which grows in Egypt.

And you can write on that, you can draw on that, but papyrus, it turns out, unless it's actually an in an Egyptian tomb completely dry with no movement and nothing to disturb it, it will just automatically fall apart. It can't cope with any kind of damp or it can't really cope with being handled. So papyrus is handy, but it's not permanent.

And then you have wax tablets and these are beautiful things, they're amazing, completely died out in Europe. But for about 2000 years, this is how Europeans retained information, took notes, wrote poems, agreed contracts, bills of sale, whatever, with a layer of wax on wood, which you would then scrape into with a little stylus,

Now obviously that's not permanent. So it's very useful for being in a poet's notebook for instance because you can wipe it over at the end of the day when you finish writing your poem. But for a business record it's no good at all because you have to know what you agreed what you contracted.

Then you have parchment. And parchment comes along a little bit later during the period of the Roman Empire, probably. And that's a really good writing material. It's very tough. It's completely indestructible. And you can write on it beautifully. And you can also paint on it, if you like. So the illuminated manuscripts, which we see, the book of Kells and so on, these are all on parchment. And they're very beautiful. But the problem is, when you write on parchment with a pen, the ink sits on the surface and dries.

which means you can scrape it off, which means that, again, it's not permanent. You can change it. You can affect the record. So it's no good for business. Paper turns up in Europe around the year 1240, 1250. And very quickly, a few people realize it's a game changer because anything which is written on paper with ink stays there. So you can have a contract. You can keep a business record. You can do anything legal. You can have a deed, for instance, and you don't have to worry about it being forged.

Yeah. And that's important. So paper is really important because it's permanent. And that leads to its very, very rapid adoption in the business community in particular.

Was that where it started? I was trying to match some of the timelines and going back through, it seems like if I have the timeline correct, there were two threads. There was kind of the people who use it for business and people who use it for recording things in their own personal lives. But it does seem like business became a real use case for notebooks first. Yeah, absolutely 100%. And the analogy which you can very easily draw is with the modern computer.

Yeah, that comes from IBM, and it's businesses and governments which have it to begin with for the first, how long, 30 years, maybe 40 years. And then you get people using it creatively, and then you get people like Jobs thinking, oh, you can have some fun with this thing. You can play games on it, but you can also be seriously creative. So now you have Pixar, for instance. And I don't think anyone at IBM in the 1940s was thinking that Pixar was going to happen. Looking back, it seems inevitable.

that people would do something like that, and it's exactly the same kind of relationship with notebooks. You have businesses come to rely on notebooks utterly, they use them for everything, and therefore notebooks get into everyone's hands, particularly in a culture like Italy, which at the time Italy is the richest part of Europe, but it's also where they invent banking, where they invent companies, where they invent

accountancy, double entry bookkeeping, limited liability partnerships, futures markets, all of these things which we know and love. And a lot of that, you talk about happens not sort of, that doesn't happen. And then they put it down in notebooks, like the existence of those things and notebooks and this new writing permanent technology, go hand in hand.

Absolutely, you can't do one without the other. But then, of course, so they have to have these networks. And once they have to have them in the evening, they take them home and then then they do the fun stuff with them. And that's entirely accidental, I think. But, you know, thank God, from our point of view, it's given us all of this interesting literature in our art and poetry.

Yeah, so I confess, I am particularly interested in the fun stuff. So let's start there. I think the first thing I had written down in my notes was like, let's go back to Florence. And there's a word that starts with the Z that I can't pronounce. And it was it was my gut tells me it's pronounced Zebo Doni, but I could be wrong.

You're dead right. You just have to imagine yourself ordering a zibaldonian and Italian restaurant and you'll be fine. A type of notebook and also a beautiful croissant like sing that I will like very much. Tell me what those were. Talk a little bit about kind of how that spread. Back to the restaurant, zibaldoni seems to have been a word for salad and that's exactly what it is. So it's a collection of lots of different things jumbled together.

Now, this is a time before print. We're talking about about 1300 and it's Florence and it's a time before print. So if you wanted to have any book or literature or poetry in your house, you had to basically write it down yourself. Yeah. And therefore, Florence is a very business-like community. They're very entrepreneurial. Everyone's got their own little business. Therefore, everyone's got their business notebooks. They take him home in the evening.

And if they hear a poem which they like, or if they hear, one of Esaup's fables is very popular, or a bit of ovid, or a prayer, which is particularly resonant to them, or a recipe, very often they're writing down medicinal cures. Anything you want to keep written down in your house, you just write it down in your zibaldoni. And it's a very personal notebook, but it's completely unsorted. So it's like a salad in this jumbled up way.

and they're brilliant because they're these windows into what Florentine people loved. So we know the poetry they like to read, we know the prayers that they wanted to remember, we know the stories that they like to tell, and we know what they liked to eat when they had a headache. All of this kind of information, because everyone in Florence at this time who could read or write, which was most of them unusually,

they kept a zibaldoni. And it was a really strange local thing, but it was so fun. I also get the sense that folks back then were reckoning with the same thing people reckon with now, which is like, what do I do with any of this? And this is sort of the eternal question of notebooks, right? Is you write a bunch of stuff down, you collect all this stuff. And as a historical artifact, especially in aggregate, it's very cool, right? You get a sense of what people were doing in a community. But if I'm a person in Florence in the 1300s, keeping one of these,

What am I doing with it, day to day? What's going to happen to these notebooks? Are they thinking about the grand sweep of history and their responsibility to write this stuff down? What was the point of these notebooks? So, the Zeweld only, the only point was fun. They weren't thinking about the grand sweep of history, but they knew that they were a bit precious because they would leave them in their wills. So, this is how we know, one of the ways we know how many people had them, because the wills often survive.

And also you see these little dedications and then someone will start their zibildone, then they'll leave it to their son. And then the son will have an argument on the pages of the zibildone with his brother saying, oh, no, dad left it to me, actually. So you have these little bickerings. And you can see that sometimes they pass down three generations and that people maintain them because the handwriting changes. So that's one thing. So zibildone, they're always for fun, but people definitely keep know that they have a value.

The other thing that they also start doing is viewing their family as a kind of business and then keeping what they would call a libri de familia or rickordanza is the other word for it, where they keep a family record, which is essentially birth, death, marriages, investments. We bought this house. I invested in this company. My daughter got married. My son died. My grandson was born. He was baptized, et cetera.

And they're very business-like. You wouldn't call them diaries because there's no emotion in there. There's no happiness or sadness. But they just record the central of most important events of a family's life. And then that would get passed down through the generations as well. But that's more viewing your family in a kind of quite serious business-like way.

If you were at a grammar school in the 1500s, 1600s in Europe, you were expected to keep a commonplace book in a very rigorous way, and that was a very formal kind of thing. But that was educational. No one ever really did that for fun, because it's such hard work. It's a real effort and it's study.

But I think that outside of school you have people like Leonardo who would just draw all over the place, you have people who doodle, you have people who write very intimate personal diaries, people who write very formal ones, people who write about their relationship with God. You know, there's no hard and fast rules.

Okay. And that feels like the thing that lingers most over time is that everybody is perpetually finding new ways to fill up a notebook. Yeah. Kind of more chaotic over time too. Everybody gets weirder and weirder about notebooks. Da Vinci is an interesting one. You mentioned him and obviously I would say you've obviously done more research on this than I have, but I would say Leonardo da Vinci's notebooks, probably history's most famous notebooks, fair to say.

Yeah, I would say so. When I was telling people that I was writing history of notebook and they were looking baffled, I would go, you know, Leonardo. Well, one thing I thought was really interesting in your telling of his story was that he

did not seem to imagine that his notebooks would eventually become wildly famous. And the idea that these were for public consumption was kind of a thing that happened much later. The notebooks were very personal and very individual. How did that change come about? At what point did people start writing notebooks, even in some of the styles that you're talking about, thinking about other people?

very, very late in the day, I would say. I think what's interesting, Leonardo's notebooks are fascinating for two reasons, I think, very far apart in time. Firstly, because they're an amazing record of his thoughts, his research, his explorations, and his personality up to a point. So that period around the year 1500, wow, there was something really incredible going on there. And then basically,

They just vanish into aristocrats libraries, you know, and no one reads them. No one, they probably pull them off the shelf and just look at them as a curiosity. No one studies them at all until the 1890s, when a German guy called Richter goes around Europe, he looks at them all, he transcribes them, he researches, he writes about them, and then for the first time, 400 years nearly after Leonardo dies,

people actually realize, oh, he wasn't just a good painter, he was also all of these other kinds of genius as well, because he was just known as a painter up to that point. And then, and I think it is a direct result of the publication of Leonardo's notebooks, and people understanding that there's this process behind his genius,

Then everyone else starts taking their notebooks much more seriously. So Picasso, for instance, he starts painting in the 1890s at exactly the same time or learns how to paint. He's a boy. And he, for instance, took his sketchbooks incredibly seriously. He never gave them away. He never lost them. He kept them filed away in boxes in his house in the south of France. And they were numbered, cataloged, ordered. He knew that his sketchbooks were really important. Whereas painters a hundred years before him,

It seems to have been a very casual relationship. Or rather, they themselves used their notebooks, but they had no sense that anyone else would ever find them interesting. I think there's definitely a change. Leonardo accidentally 400 years after his death prompts it.

Any kind of well-known writer now will sell their papers to the University of Austin, for instance, collects writers' notebooks, and it will pay good money for them 150 years ago. Universities were not doing that. They wouldn't have seen the value.

Do you think that changes the way we look at those notebooks now? I think about even go back to Florence. You think about those as an important record of real life in a way that as soon as people become self-conscious that someone else might see their notebooks,

It sort of ceases to be a record of real life. It becomes an Instagram version of real life where everything is maybe subtly self-consciously changed to be for public consumption in a way that, I don't know, like we think about notebooks as these intensely private things. But as soon as you understand that someone else might see it, I wonder if it changes what that thing is.

When it comes to diary writing in particular, any number of published diaries you can tell were written with publication in mind. I write a diary every day and I don't expect that anyone else will ever read it and it's certainly never going to be published. I think you're right, it's more intimate and it's pretty uncensored.

unfiltered. But then you have the Tony Blair's of this world whose diaries have published, I think, and that's a completely different kettle of fish. Yeah. And I guess that's okay. Both of those things can exist, but they are very different things. Yeah. Yeah. Very, very definitely. Yeah. Okay. I am really curious about how you, as a person in a digital world, came to think about notebooks, because again, there is such a

There's so much about that history that A feels very modern. Like we're talking about the same kinds of things now. And like you said, using computers for the same kinds of things that people were using notebooks for 800 years ago.

But I wonder if you're going through and you have to spend time thinking about the thing itself. And like you said, paper is this crucially important invention. And if we had invented computers in 1200 instead of inventing paper, would it have gone roughly the same way? Or is there something about that thing and that time and that invention that made it different from even everything that came after?

I think, up to a point, the invention makes the time. You said to me very confidently that we live in a digital world. Of course, you are right. We do definitely live in a digital world. We're speaking to each other via a digital link up and surrounded by amazing technology.

I would also, if I was being contrarian, say to you, you're living in a notebook world, because capitalism, which gives us all of what we see around us, that for 600 years, was entirely based in notebooks. We would call them ledges or account books.

But it was an entirely notebook-based system until the first IBM machines. And that was invented at the same time as, or roughly speaking, the same time as the notebook arrives in Europe, in that place in Italy around the year 1300, they invent all of the mechanisms of capitalism. So really, we are in that world as much as we're in the digital world.

But yeah, there is definitely a sense of you have an invention and then it shapes the world that you live in, but in unexpected, surprising, fun, hopefully, ways. No one saw that Twitter was coming 10 years before Twitter arrived. And then suddenly it's everywhere and then suddenly it's nowhere again. So who knows?

So, okay, let's fast forward a bunch in history to not now, but close to now. And I want to talk about the bullet journal. And the reason I wanted to start with this ziplodyoni is that I feel like you can draw a straight line from that thing in Florence 800 years ago to the bullet journal phenomenon of today.

like a dead straight line through almost a millennium of time. How is that possible? Why do you think this thing, this idea of how we want to record our lives in a physical notebook has been so insistently persistent over so many centuries?

It's a really great simple minimal tool. With any kind of technology or any kind of invention, there's a real virtue to simplicity. So your knife and fork or your chopsticks. Chopsticks are great because they're minimal. Once you've pictured them, you've invented them once. You cannot improve on them. And a notebook, I think, is a lot like that. It came to a very quickly.

kind of perfect in terms of how practical it was, how cheap it was, how available it was to everyone.

And you can't really improve on that as a bit of technology, you know, because, and then people will use it in different ways over history. And bullet journals are, I think, a really good example of how you can take this really simple thing and just use it in a slightly new way. And suddenly it opens possibilities for people which they never appreciated before. Like there are a lot of people who's genuinely, there are a surprising number of people whose lives have really been improved by

doing bullet points to organize their life and it kind of helps them to rationalize things and make proper decisions and act more intentionally and thereby live happier lives. I think I find it constantly incredible how this really simple thing can be reinvented so regularly. But you're right, there is a continuous line all the way through. I think it's just because it's incredibly simple and it doesn't require batteries. It doesn't require system updates. If you drop it, it doesn't break.

What was it that was interesting to you about the bullet journal and its history? Why did that jump out to you as a thing worth adding to this history? It was important to me because, firstly, because it was a real thing. It was a real trend when I was starting to think about the book. It gave me confidence that there was going to be an appetite of people who were interested in this stuff, which is really key in terms of building my confidence.

And then what was interesting was, I never, I've never bullet journaled myself. I've never done the rider carol method, but I got his book and then I spoke to him, interviewed him. And he's really thought about it quite deeply. And he's thought about the implications of writing stuff down and of organizing your thoughts on the page and having this notebook which you carry everywhere and which you write everything down on.

And that kind of encouraged me to think deeply about it too. He's taken it very seriously for a long time, and he's thought about it in a particular way, and I've got a more historical angle, and I think about it in different ways, but they're completely compatible. But just the fact that he had taken it seriously, I found really interesting. And hence, giving him a chapter, I think, was kind of fair, because he was really about the only person who'd written a book about

Notebooking, you know, before I did. So, and he also has some really interesting things to say about notebooks which aren't bullet channels. He was really inspired, for instance, by kind of artists, scrapbooks and sort of collages and

sketchbooks which were sort of more than sketchbooks which had elements of diary in them. So not pure bullet journal stuff, but stuff which is a really interesting expression of your experience. And Ryder definitely put me onto those things.

Why do you think that way of thinking about notebooking and journaling and keeping track of your life lagged so much the business side of things, which as you chart in the book got really systematized and really specific and like we built capitalism on top of these things, right?

Double entry accounting became a worldwide phenomenon and people understood how to do it. And there were kind of accepted rules on how to keep these kinds of notebooks, but in people doing it in their own lives, like you said, there have been bits and pieces of this over time, but somebody like Ryder Carroll comes along hundreds of years later and really thinks like, okay, how can I break this thing down into sort of understandable, repeatable pieces? That just happened much later. Why do you think that is?

Honestly, I have no idea. There are questions. Another big question, which I just have no idea, is why did people start writing diaries? Why did they start writing diaries in England around the year 1570?

when they'd never done them anywhere else in the world before. I've looked really hard trying to find out what was so special about England at that time, which made people start to keep a diary like you would an emotional diary of how they felt about the day's events. Sorry, not very good podcast material. I'm making a baffled expression. Listen, the picture that I have no idea. And I think my answer to your question is, it's a good question. I have no idea.

Yeah. I have a theory, and it's based on nothing, but it's a theory. And I'm going to give you my theory as a way of asking you another question, which I also have about that. I'm here for it. I think, especially as we became more enmeshed with digital tools,

Life took on like a new level of informational chaos. There is just more stuff coming at us now than there ever has been. And that's true in our professional lives, but it's also true in our personal lives, I think in a new way.

in the last, I don't know, several decades that there's just more happening around you and to you all the time. And we're still reckoning with that as people, right? This question of like, we understand what is going on in the world in a way that we are like evolutionarily not equipped to do. And what do we do with that? All these really interesting questions, but I think

One thing that I see all the time is people crave systems. There is this idea that if I can just find a way to make this make sense, everything will be better. And you mentioned the getting things done method in the book also. And I think that speaks to the same thing where it's like, there is this swirling mass of stuff in my life. And if you can just tell me where to put it and how,

my brain will get quieter. And I think that's meaningful to people. And again, there is a definite sort of we are people of our time and technology thing that is all kind of swirling together there. But I feel like when I see people who like really love bullet journal, what it what it says is like the world is insane and messy. But I have made this thing that is like my world and it is beautiful and looks like me.

And it just feels good. And it's why people get mad at all the bullet journalers who are spending all of their time organizing their pages and not time getting stuff done. And it's like, no, the organizing the pages is actually the point of the thing, as much as anything else. It's taking control. Right. Making the notebook is the point. And I feel like that was one of the things that just keeps coming up throughout history in your book is the act of making the thing.

is as much the point as anything else. Going back interviewing, it is fine doing stuff with what you put in. It is fine. But the act of making the notebook in the first place is maybe the most important part of the whole process. And I feel like there's so much of that happening right now that we need structure around that more than ever. That's just a theory.

That's it and my answer to that is yes. That's the short answer. Slightly more involved example or to sort of back up what you said. So I have a day job and I do this, I write books and talk to people about it.

And so the level of inputs into my life in terms of communication and things flying at me from different directions. I've got two email addresses. I've got the Instagram. I've got the Twitter, which I'm switching off shortly, but I've got the Facebook. I've got WhatsApp on the phone, et cetera, et cetera. It just goes on. And that's before, I'm in a room with anyone actually talking from face to face.

My way of dealing with this is to write a diary. At the end of the day, I will put it all down in here and it's under control, as you say, and I've turned this ephemeral non-stop flow of craziness, most of which is completely trivial but has to be managed somehow.

And I've just turned it into a calm thing on the page. Yeah, I completely agree. And as to how that makes me feel, the analogy I use is it's like having a shower. Yeah, showers are lovely. Yeah, just great.

I like to have a shower every day, but if I can't, if I have to go a day without, that's fine. No one really minds two days without it's mentally, I start to smell. And that's what I'm like with the diary. I can't miss two days. I start to smell mentally. And it really cleans me out sort of that process of just dumping it on the page.

really, really is refreshing and cleansing in that sense. Yeah, I like that a lot. Why do you think we haven't found a way to do that digitally in the way that is satisfying and valuable in the same way that we have in notebooks? Because we pretty much do business on computers now. There's not a lot of paper notebooks out there responsible for how capitalism runs anymore. But I think I am someone who

has tried every note-taking app on planet Earth. I obsessively use them. I build these systems and overwhelmingly the ones that feel the best. And as I talk to people, the answer is you try them all and you eventually just get a nice notebook and a pen and you start filling it. And there is something about that that we have not replaced. And I'm curious if you have thoughts on why it has been so hard to replace.

I have lots of thoughts. I'm going to give you the deepest one because I think your listener can cope with a sort of high level bit of neurobiology. So when you write on a notebook page, and they've done this with MRI scans and a very clever way of using multiple MRI scans called voxel based more formatory when you can look at multiple brains at once, when you write in a notebook,

you'd use different parts of the brain to when you type or when you write something on your phone or your tablet. And one of the different parts you use is the hippocampus. Now this is right in the bottom of the brain and it's your mental map. So when you drive to your place of work, you're using your hippocampus.

When you know where the coffee cups are in your kitchen, you're using the hippocampus. Taxi drivers, cab drivers, have amazingly well-developed hippocampus. It was an early case study in brain plasticity, actually. So this is very interesting. Why do you engage your hippocampus when you're writing in a notebook? And it's because your notebook is a place

right and it has its own geography so when you write things on the pages of a notebook you remember or i certainly tend to remember all that was on the left hand side at the top of that was i wrote that in blue somewhere now that was at the back of the note that was at the front. And i'm thinking about the notebook in quite a different way to how i think about a digital note. And what they think the people who research this.

is that when you scroll or you carry on writing and what you've written on a screen just scrolls up at the top of the page and vanishes off the top of your screen, it just vanishes. It has no place in the geography of your lived experience unlike stuff which you write down in a notebook page. So I've got my yellow notebook and I know that if I open it halfway through roughly speaking, I'm going to find what happened in July.

And I can't do that with notes I've made on an iPad. Just because my brain hasn't thought about them in that geographic way. So that's one reason.

Why? You feel more comfortable and you navigate those notes more happily than you do when they're digital. Other reasons to do with, I think, the sort of the sensory experience of writing, fingers on the page, depending on your hand, being a slightly richer experience, it's more difficult as well. It's very easy to type. You can type, you could, roughly speaking, type everything I said to you right now. You'd get it all pretty much down.

You can't do that with the pen and ink you have to filter you have to pass the ideas you have to process them and paraphrase and that gives you a much richer deeper understanding of what you are actually listening to you can type.

whatever I say, without actually listening to what I'm saying at all, but to write it down, you have to paraphrase it and therefore you have to actually interact with the ideas. So this is why teachers and academics much prefer their students to write notes rather than to type them. So those are a couple of answers.

Do you think there's a marriage there that we can make work? I mean, I keep thinking about you. You start the book with Moleskine, which is probably the first notebook most people think of when they think of notebooks. And Moleskine for years has been building digital tools and they have a really beautiful calendar app. They have a really interesting journaling system. It's all very good.

Nobody cares about it the way that they care about physical moleskin notebooks. And, you know, there was this phase for a long time of like, maybe we're gonna do smart pens where I'll write in a notebook, but it will transcribe it digitally. And now there are things that are like, okay, you can write with a pen, but it's on your iPad and it will recognize the text and make something out of it. And it feels like we're poking at this thing where the act that you're describing I think is absolutely the best one.

But having a notebook that is a bunch of words on a page that sits on my bookshelf waiting for me to do something with it feels like it's missing something. Like there is a best of both worlds here that I think I desperately want to exist. And I don't know, maybe it just doesn't and can't and won't. But I am curious, like, do you think we can marry those two things?

I'm not going to say never. I've not seen it done yet in a way which I think some people, that sort of the Moleskine magic paper, the dotted paper, whatever, they make it work for them and good luck and that's great. And some people also manage to make those kind of posh tablets, the remarkable tablets work in a similar way. And again, go you. Personally, I haven't ever managed to.

Okay, last thing. And then I will truly let you go. Tell me just briefly about Moleskin and why you start the book with Moleskin. I want to end our podcast with Moleskin. Why is Moleskin so ascended? What is it about this company and this thing that has made Moleskin the brand, the notebook, the thing in our sort of modern world?

It's the complete refinement she took, and I say she, Maria Segrabondi, who was the woman who conceived the Moleskin notebook, who took the very simple basic notebook that we knew. She added to it. She added this little elastic strap, the pocket in the back, the little page at the front saying, if you find this notebook, please return it to.

She added all of these things to a very minimal product, and she somehow made it seem even more minimal. And the analogy I make, she made it minimal, and she made it black. And that was the most Italian thing you could do. It's like pear sol sunglasses, prada, little black dress, espresso. That's what they do. They make it minimal and black. And she did that and somehow

She just, she tricked us, if you like. She fooled us. And thank God that she did. I wouldn't have written this book if it wasn't for emulskins, I think, because she made us look again at this simple notebook and think of it as something which had some material value that had some material beauty and could be there for inspiring in a way that your school exercise book couldn't be.

So she's from that point of view she's my heroine creatively she's also a familiar figure of all because if you look at moleskins numbers the company's numbers through history. That company's profit margin is ridiculous it's like 43% profit every year gross profit and it's a manufacturing company no company does that.

How did they do it? I take my hat off to her and I can forget quite easily about all of the ridiculous collaborations with Evernote and Adobe and things like that. Listen, you've got to do some weird stuff. Because the key product is amazing. To that point, actually, one of the things you say kind of as an aside in the book is that there are

A million other notebooks that are like, they, they give you ideas and prompts and they put stuff inside and they're like, this one's for your recipes. This one is for your travels. Uh, and what actually turns out to be the case is nobody wants that. They want the blank one. And I think that is like, as a, as a perfect metaphor for all of this, that just carries with me through the whole thing that like you can, you can make it whatever you want. You can guss it up and people will want the blank one because then they can do what they want with it. And there's something very powerful in that.

Yeah. Freedom. Yeah. I mean, that's the story of the notebook, right? It is permanence and its freedom in very real ways. Lovely. Yes. I'll take that. Can I? Can I have that? Yeah, I'll take that. All right. We got to take one more break and then we're going to come back and take a question from the Vergast Hotline. We'll be right back.

Support for the VergeCast comes from Polestar. Electric performance is at the core of every decision that went into Polestar's first all-electric SUV, Polestar 3. For example, it has a computer-controlled torque-vectoring system, which basically senses and redistributes power to the wheel with more grip. That means tighter turns.

Polestar 3 even allows the driver to optimize the powertrain between performance or range mode, depending on your drive's needs. You're able to go from 0 to 60 in as little as 4.8 seconds and get an EPA-estimated range of up to 350 miles per charge. And it's designed as intentional too. It features a sleek aerodynamic exterior, but a minimalist, carefully curated interior that emphasizes the spaciousness of the cabin.

And you can relax on your drives too with an intuitive infotainment screen and an uncuttered dashboard. Polestar 3 is the SUV that drives like a sports car. It has a lot to offer, but you can only fully understand it by trying it out for yourself at your local Polestar space. Hook a test drive for Polestar 3 at Polestar.com.

All right, we're back. Let's get to the hotline. As always, the number is 866-Verge-1-1. The email is vergcastattheverge.com. Please send us all of your questions. We have a couple of specific hotline-y things we're going to do in the next couple of months before the end of the year. So keep an eye on our socials. We'll mention it on this show, but

all of your questions. Send them to the hotline. We love it. This week, like I mentioned, we have something slightly different. We got a question that sent our producer, Will Poor, down a pretty wild rabbit hole inside the TikTok shop. So here, let me just play you the question, and then Will's going to take it away. Here we go. Everyone, this is Sean from Ohio. I know that Nely specifically hates carplay, but one thing I've been saying, pop up on TikTok a bunch lately,

is these CarPlay adaptable screens that they plug into your car somehow. And it's kind of like a retrofit for old vehicles to use CarPlay or Android Auto. I've been seeing them all over TikTok lately. I don't know if this is vaporware. If this is real, until the other day, I saw one out in the wild in a car next to me.

And I wanted to wave them down and ask them if it's good or not. So wondering if you guys think they're good. Is this just a crazy team of technology or whatever? Anyways, love to hear your opinion. Thanks. Bye. So I am the proud owner of a 2006 Toyota Prius. And I would love to have CarPlay. So as soon as I heard this hotline question, I went on TikTok and I just searched for CarPlay screen. And I found exactly what our listener Sean was looking at.

If you're like me and you have a much older car that you want to feel more expensive, you need this portable Apple CarPlay. Once you're connected to the CarPlay, it has your phone, your messages, all your different apps on there as well. And it's a great price. Don't sleep on this. Shop at the link below. You could save yourself hundreds of dollars.

There are at least a couple of different models for sale on the shop. The one I saw the most was made by He-Ha, He-Ha, H-I-E-H-A. It's a seven-inch color touchscreen. It comes with a couple of different mounting options for your car, and they throw in a backup camera. And all of that is $37, allegedly marked down from 120, which is a very suspicious markdown.

I also found a lot of really similar listings for similar products, similar prices, similar markdowns. I've never bought anything on TikTok. It was all really overwhelming and all a little bit sketchy feeling. So Sean, I completely understand your feeling of, is this real? Is this not real?

You know, it all kind of reminded me of the, you know, page seven of an Amazon search result page for a gadget, but it's $37. That is an amount of money that the Verge can put on the line on your behalf. So I ordered it. Okay. I got my car play screen in the mail. The brand on the box is uni uni, but it says from TikTok, Incorporated. It came very quickly.

Let's open it up. My first impressions of it, seven inches is actually a pretty big screen. It kind of has an iPad mini vibe to it. It seems solid enough. It comes with a power cable that goes out to a cigarette lighter or it's a USB-C if you happen to have that. There's an aux cable that it comes with. It's got the backup camera and the wiring and two different suction or adhesive mounting options for your dashboard.

The screen itself is kind of heavy and the mounts are pretty cheap plastic, so I was a little bit worried about how well it was gonna mount stably to the dashboard, but I gave it a shot. Let's figure out where to put this thing.

One tricky thing for me was just figuring out where to put it. Like my Prius has a screen and I need that for the existing backup camera and for AC and for other stuff that I don't have physical buttons for. So it needs to be a second screen that I put on the dash somewhere that is not going to block my view of the road or my view of the speedometer, etc, etc.

Mounting itself turned out to be fine. The suction and the adhesive worked out well. And once I turned the car on, the screen worked fine. Okay, it's turning on.

I've got options for CarPlay, Android Auto, phone, link, and audio output. Setup was really easy. It was reasonably bright and responsive. I don't know. It was a little laggy, a little bit washed out. But again, $37. And for what it's worth, it is a ton better than my existing Prius screen. Head south on 30th Avenue Southwest toward Southwest Cambridge Street.

I drove around with it for a while, and I don't know, it did all the car play things. Google Maps is amazing on a much larger screen if you're used to a phone that's in a holster on your dashboard. It was easy to see texts when I was parked. There's a lot of little perks to it.

Audio was a little bit more complicated. It comes with a bunch of options to send audio. One, there's a standard aux jack, which for me means a long awkward snaking cable to the port in my car. You can use Bluetooth, which is just horrible on my Prius, so that's a no. You can send audio to FM radio, which I kind of love and is an amazing throwback.

or it does have an internal speaker, which is crappy, but it's actually fine for directions if that's the only thing you need the audio for. And by the way, if you ever wanted to know what the Vergecast would sound like on FM radio, here you go. Welcome to the Vergecast, the flagship podcast of Quantified Rims cycles.

So like I said, I drove around for an afternoon with it. And there were things I struggled with, but they don't actually have much to do with the device itself. The screen is cheap, but it's functional. But a couple of things stood out. The first thing is to get the most out of it, I would need to install it on my dashboard. And then I'd need to snake the power to the cigarette lighter in one part of the car and then snake the audio cable to the aux port in another part of the car.

And if I wanted the backup camera, I'd have to wire that to the brake light and to the screen. It's all just a lot of cable management. Like you're putting a screen in the car where there wasn't one, or in my case, finding a place for a second screen, which is all doable, but it's not something that TikToks show you because, you know, they're all trying to sell you this thing. Like if I did a TikTok review, 100% of it would just be really awkward cable management.

And then the other thing that I realized all at once as I was driving down the street is that, oh, wait, I live in a neighborhood where car break-ins happen kind of a lot. And I now have what looks like an iPad mini just sitting on my dashboard at all times. Like this thing 100% is going to get stolen at some point.

Which again is not a knock on the screen itself and it might not be a concern for you where you live. But it's kind of a deal breaker for me because there's no way this thing is worth a broken window. So Sean, what are we to make of this thing?

Well, at a really basic level, it does what it claims to do. I don't know how long it will last. It's certainly really cheap. But it all works. It gives you car play in your car if you didn't have it before. And the rest of it is just up to you to make work with your car.

For me, I've always been jealous of people with CarPlay, but now I'm faced with this question, is this actually better than just putting my phone in a holster on the dashboard? And I think my answer is no, honestly, but your answer might be different.

All right, that is it for the Vergecast today. Thank you to everyone who was on the show and thank you, as always, for listening. There's lots more on everything we talked about from all the Jake Paul, Mike Tyson Netflix stuff, to Roland Allen's book, to all the stuff about the TikTok shop on the Verge.com. I'll put a lot of links in the show notes. There are a lot of links this week, but as always, read the Verge.com. It's a good website.

And if you have thoughts, questions, feelings, or other good ideas of notebooks that I should buy, you can always email us at vergastattheverge.com or call the hotline 866-1-1. Again, we have some fun stuff coming for the hotline in the next few weeks, so keep an eye on our socials, keep it locked here, we'll keep you posted.

This show is produced by Liam James, Will Poor, and Eric Gomez. The Vergecast is a Verge production and part of the Vox Media podcast network. Neil and I will be back on Friday to talk about all the news happening this week, all the new gadgets, all the wild stuff with the FCC, and maybe we will have named Show and Tell by then, but frankly, I wouldn't bet on it. We'll see you then, rock and roll.

Support for the Vergecast comes from Polestar. Polestar's first all-electric SUV, Polestar 3, is now on the roads across the US, and it's ready to make an impression. It's got a sleek aerodynamic exterior and a spacious minimalist interior. Its custom-developed Android Automotive OS is totally integrated, made to enhance your driving experience. That includes an intuitive infotainment screen, smart voice controls, and over-the-air updates.

And you can have Google turn on your favorite podcast whenever you want to be immersed in 3D surround sound by Bowers and Wilkins. See what else Polestar 3 has to offer when you test drive at your local Polestar space. Book yours today at Polestar.com.