BREAKING: Russia Launches ICBM for First Time in History - What Happens Next?

Do you experience anti-Soviet sinking, overvaluing freedom or delusions of reformation? This is telltale signs of sluggish schizophrenia as your doctor about Gulag. Do you have hopes of freedom? Gulag? Do you believe that life matters? Gulag? Do you have dissenting opinion?

Take Gulag. Do you say right now to yourself, if broken no law, nor am I political dissident, you get extra Gulag. Side effects may include Gulag. And in rare cases, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

See if good luck is right for you.

Oh, just as we come in, an attack chopper decided to fly overhead. Busy morning, busy morning, because we have a lot to get to. We have Mark Mitchell on the show today of a Rasmussen, reports Rasmussen polling. You may be familiar, he's the guy who pretty much, he's the head honcho over there. Got it closest in this last election, and then of course was immediately accused of colluding.

from the leftists who got it wrong. I haven't heard that yet. So we're going to talk with him. And he actually believes that there are some people. He has a strong case to be made. He'll be on the show today to talk about how some other pollsters may have actually been, including Iowa. And we also have an exclusive mucklem undercover, a leaked email from NASA. Today you'll see it for the very first time where they are very over there at NASA, afraid of Donald Trump and what will happen in our space program with DEI.

That's a real email, still. So we'll get to it. Russia, Ukraine, some stuff is going on, some people are saying World War III. As a new development, did you know this? We're going to talk about this, that Putin has said, this is according to Reuters, he may be able to sit down and deescalate and talk about a ceasefire, but only with Donald Trump. So let me ask you, do you think that that means Donald Trump is a puppet of Putin? Or does Donald Trump deserve some credit if he helps us avoid World War III?

Thank you very much. We have some predictions to make too. We also have a seven plus one because David Hogg has hosted an actual conference asking young men what they want and trying to woo them back to the Democratic Party. They said more Hogg. Yeah. There's no. I'm not a young man. So he's the leader. So we'll be talking about David Hogg. He is of age now. So it's perfectly fine to consult him, which means at some point today you may see this.

Head on over to Rumble, I don't know why you're watching on YouTube, it's a live show, weekdays, 10 a.m., nothing up her sleeves, and including tomorrow, if you're on Rumble Premium. All right, Captain Morgan number two, CEO, how are you? I'm doing well, how are you? I'm good, I'm good, we have so much to get to. We'll just go fast then. And then we have, of course, you know them, you love them, you hear this?

December 1st, Avenue Tattoo Studio Lawton, Oklahoma. Mr. Firestein, how are you? I'm good. I like it raw. Let's go. Hey, hey, there are kids watching. By the way, onions. This is a strong, I hate vegetables. You're crazy. I only like onions. Eat tacos. So I'll take comment below. Raw onions, ugh, ugh.

I like pickle onions. I said raw onions. I was very specific, and I chose my words carefully. Josh and I are aligned on this. Sautéed sucks, bro. What's the matter with you? Yeah, we'll go form your own raw onion, NATO, which is at least two or two on that. And pay your fair share. I won't. Right off the bat, we have an exclusive here. This is an email that we captured circulating from NASA. This is my club undercover.

you

All right, this is now, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, I'm gonna, it's not like Jay Varma locking you down while he's having sex parties or, you know, the DOJ representative saying, yeah, we're simply trying to weaponize the DOJ against Donald Trump. We have the Diddy Party list, but no, we do not, but this is a lot of fun. This is, yeah. So this is an email that was sent to employees at the Johnson Space Center and it included a section titled, what Trump's second term could mean for DEI.

And I believe, and they're very concerned about DEI. They're very concerned about people being on the chopping block. They're very concerned that some people will be negatively affected. And actually we can confirm most heavily affected immediately were the promptly fired, not so hidden figures. They were, yeah. We didn't even change it. No, we didn't change it. I don't even know what.

I don't even know if I believe that there was that much discrimination that someone's going to like, everyone knows fat black women can't do math. Like, what? That probably doesn't work. Is that like a stereotype of like engineers? Yeah, I don't know. You know, astrophysicists. Are they, are they racist? We got rockets. They didn't want to be yelled at. Imagine the challenger is like, I told you, it's about the thrust, mother. You get what you get. Guess what you get. Told them.

Go back to your graph calculator. Mine smells boobs. No. This is from the actual email circulating at NASA. In case you wondered like, hey, we've told you this week, $500 billion a year lost in fraud. No, I don't mean $500 billion a year, maybe misspent or maybe over budget. I mean,

vaporized gone every year. You may not know this in the United States budget. A lot of it with the military, too. When you take that into it, and then you sort of cross-reference that with what you're about to hear being circulated from NASA officially off the record, I think. Maybe the government's priorities aren't in the right place. So here's what they wrote. They wrote, those who support the values of diversity, equity, and inclusion are rightly concerned. And fired.

about the impact of Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 US presidential election. I love how they have to specify which election in which year because they know how disengaged some of their career blackies are. Okay, it is clear the incoming Trump administration will almost certainly escalate the growing backlash against DEI in the workplace. Hold on a second. The backlash is from the American public because they cannot

I would imagine comment below. Can you imagine a place or think of a place where race or gender could be less relevant than NASA? What percentage should enter into the equation? Let me ask if you're the one in the rocket going up. How much do you care about the melanin and the level of the skin to the guy or woman or Z hitting the button?

That's the backlash. This is when you see all these emails, when you see all these statements, when you see these freakouts, they are freaking out against you. You're the backlash. So good for you. Keep it up. Even under the most pessimistic scenario.

many forms of DEI will remain lawful under a Trump presidency. DEI programs that do not confer a preference on legally protected groups are likely to remain legally safe for this foreseeable future, which means they are going to do everything they can to still try and implement DEI. And by the way, something that's very important when you're talking about DEI, that also means doing away with performance metrics in the workplace. You understand that, right?

You can only have one or the other. You can't have DEI. You can't have enforced outcomes and also base it on performance metrics. It's not possible that you just for proof see affirmative action. Email also also told people about some special DEI focused events and upcoming workshops included. This is NASA. Parents of transgender kids.

What is that? That's an event? Yeah, that's a workshop. And then this one belonging with beverages and allies. I don't even know what that means. Sounds like we're getting drunk though, so it does. It sounds kind of cool. With parents of transgender kids. The drunker I get, the more like a lady you look. Wait, this is NASA? This is NASA. I want fierce competition over performance. You know what? How about this? Whatever SpaceX is doing, do that. They're catching rockets, okay?

do whatever they're doing and by the way it's in life so first african-american racketeer

Man, listen to this!

Okay, so I still, that's funny, but I wasn't able to set it up because two men, I was talking about Elon Musk as the first African. I thought you said American. No, still a little bit. That was, can I modify yourself? That was, yes, you should. I don't know, he paused, he paused. No, I think it modest, because there's a set up with an armstrong in it. That was the whole historical footage of when they retroactively tried to change Neil Armstrong with Louis. When I said African American, I was talking about Elon Musk. The point is NASA,

Space X is kicking your ass. Research also said it's very important to note that if you go to Steven's X account, you can see the entire memo. Yes, you can see the entire memo on my X account. Of course, you can go to a lot of credit.com link in the description where you can read the memo. It is. Sorry, that tool man's screwed up. I'm seeing video of a ballistic missile over here from CNN. It's hilarious.

That's not what people say. No, that's sarcasm. We're not a comedy show. What do you lose your mind laughing over stillbirth? You're really disgusting. Wait, let's not promote the full letter being on social media and watch CNN. Yes. I didn't want to bring up CNN. Have you seen Gerald's favorite comedy Oppenheimer? I laughed until I cried. Yes. He does a great Schindler's list. He's one of his kids in Nolagay.

There's other ones named Mangala, which is weird. So this is a testament to the great work that you do and the tips that we get at Mug Club Undercover. But you may not remember this. This is a win. I want you to celebrate it. And it's only supported by Rumble Premium, those of you who are members of it. Right. That's what makes the trains run on time. I shouldn't say that one, which I'm not sure. So I have a... The trans office run on time here.

By the way, by the way, Sam from HR is actually glad that we brought Nazis into NASA because he said that of all of his gripes with the Nazis being disorganized was not chief amongst them. Right that one up New York Post or Daily Mail. This is my definition in abusive work environments. We're not even gonna deny it. Is that some medic semantics?

The new segment we should make I swear to you he's like well they did calculate down to every every Jew who they kill was worth $40 when they could sell I'm like a tunnel or something of course

He hates the Nazis. But you know what? That's what you didn't want. He took, oh, you guys are really good at building rockets? Well, guess what? You work for us now. You enslave them and you feed them enough so that they don't run away. And now, congratulations. You have Nazis in the payroll at NASA. So, mug club undercover.

Here's the win for you guys. We have an update on one of our stories that went viral on social media. For those of you who don't remember last week, we infiltrated a Zoom meeting for the Democrat activist group, Blue Victory USA, and they had this post-election war room. So for those who don't remember, I'm going to roll this clip for you. It's difficult to understand what they're saying because they are incredibly inarticulate, but just do your best.

and I still believe that, you know, what we're really experiencing right now is a very vulcanized selective recession or certain regions. They love the word vulcanized. They split up hard right now, but the issue wasn't addressed that way in the national press. Like, for example, even in very high covariates, like my own in Silicon Valley, you know, 35, 40% of the job accepted

I could go to sleep in the last three years of very successive waves of layoffs. And a lot of these people were having very high-income positions well into, you know, $200,000, $300,000 a year. But, you know, right now, they just kind of want to like, you know, I think the party messed up in that they just wanted to constantly express, you know, broad metrics, right? I was in front of an early 90s food court. Even the Department of Labor were lying. That is at the top of those things.

which that was later uncovered that like 80,000 of these jobs that were created were flops. This is key. And so I think that

In the deep underlying feeling of the electorate, they knew this was going on and they did not appreciate the Dems doing this. Right? I mean, they were smarter than that. So the reason they were upset at the infiltration is because you see behind closed doors, they acknowledge. And by the way, these are, I mean, use the eyeball test. These are clearly died in the whole leftist activist, you know, radical leftist progressives, you know, the Democratic Party. And they were saying, yeah, the numbers were not true.

The employment numbers and we weren't happy about the fact that I get you have to win an election, but as employment numbers they were they were just fluffed up They were I mean there's these were these are puff pieces out there and we knew it wasn't true So they don't like you being any other teams huddle. So on Monday blue victory sent out an email to their members addressing the infiltration It's kind of like media matters actually has a rumble premium membership just so they can

If he's linked his account, please link your account. So this is what Blue Victory sent out. They said, I wanted to warn you that last week's meeting was recorded by a troll and posted on X by Stephen Crowder, who has a big following on social media. I have removed the troll account, but I don't think I have the ability to stop random people from recording the meetings and posting them anywhere. No, I want to make one. You've removed one, maybe two troll accounts.

and here's the thing our eyes and ears are everywhere that's because you what you do your support and by the way if you see something or you hear something fraud waste abuse corruption funny stuff like this like a walking anime character send your tip

To LWC tips at protonmail.com, it is encrypted. We will track down all of these leads, and we will protect our sources with our life. We'll go to jail to protect our sources. Not that this one really matters. I don't think anyone's going to jail, but you know, it's worth a laugh. So you can send us any kind of a tip. Any good story, dating tips, investment tips. Oh, hey, that reminds me. I just got approved to purchase a new house. Oh.

Nice. Congratulations. Yeah. That's good. Yeah. They hooked me up with a great interest rate. You get a good rate stuff. Yeah. Well, if you don't mind me asking, what are you doing? I don't want to make anybody jealous. Oh, come on. I'm going to be feel bad about the rate they got. You got a good one? Yeah. You can tell us, too. Hey, go ahead. 12%. What? 12%. Yeah, my mortgage guy hooked it up. So no, I don't think your guy hooked up any. That's clear. Gerald, Gerald, what did you get? Like around five.

What? Yeah. Dude, that's so weak! No, I don't think, Josh, I don't think, I don't think you know, only five percent. I don't think you know how this works. That's so low. What'd you get? I got like two and a half. Dude, what a shot. Wait, Josh, are you negotiating up?

Yeah, I learned the new book I got. The art of the dealer, art of the dealer. Is it? Oh, yeah. Yeah, that's the wrong book. Yeah, that's the wrong book. I don't really need to go to American financing and get a better and get a better. You're clearly the one who would most benefit from the service. You got screw up our sponsor.

Yeah, go to americanfinanceing.net slash Crowder, you can finance a home. No upfront fees, close in 10 days, you save $800 a month on like an average mortgage out there, you can call 1-800-974-6500, americanfinanceing.net slash Crowder dot. Or get the number, the NMLS. Well, I don't understand, I just, I need to say. Yeah, you just have to say the, what's the, I need to say it for legal purposes. You have to say the number, yes. Do you have to explain why I have to say the number? No, of course not.

NMLS182334. There you go. See? Now you're safe. Was that so hard? That's all I need to do. You did it. Why do I activate it? I don't know. I don't even know what it means. OK. You have to say NMLS182334, I guess. americanfinanceing.net slash crowder. Hey, do you think I get a discount for this tattoo? Yeah, I don't know. I mean, maybe they'll raise it to 13. So let's go to Russia and Ukraine. We're getting some updates right now. We'll get a little bit of a change. OK, we're fine.

So this is something I want to, and before we get to Mr. Mitchell of Rasmussen reports in David Hogg, is it Rasmussen reports or Rasmussen polls because I know, I want to make sure that I get it right. But this guy is the head honcho over there. He really knows what he's doing. Before we get to that, Russia, Ukraine. Okay. There's a lot going on. We're going to give you the timeline because I don't believe we discussed this a ton yesterday. We gave you a pretty thorough rundown Tuesday. A lot has happened since Tuesday. We'll go through that timeline.

But let me tell you what I think is most interesting here, okay, is that Putin, according to Reuters, has said that he would be open to a ceasefire talk or de-escalations, but only if the conversation takes place with Donald Trump. So we'll go through what has led us to that point and what that means, it's time for insane in Ukraine.

Insane, nothing you cryin'

All right, let me, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's go, let's

Putin did say that in September, that would be a dramatic escalation. Okay. Here's a, we'll just go through here. That's one, two. Russia updated its nuclear doctrine after lowering the threshold for using nukes. Okay. So that's basically saying like, we may, we may look, we're changing this where maybe, and I wrote this on my biggest, my longest table. We may now use nukes. We don't know. I don't want to smack you. Really quick. People making a big deal of this. They made it public. This has pretty much been somewhat the policy they've had for a while. This is for show.

Right, but I just want to make sure that no one feels like we've left anything out. All the reference is available, linking the sidebar as we do, you know, every show. So then on Wednesday, Ukraine launched long range British storm shadow missiles. That's a cool name too. Into Russia for the first. Really cool names for the storm shadow. You got to have cool names for a missile. You can't have a weird, you can't. Yeah. Yeah. The flange. It's not a good missile name. No. I get prepared to be buried by a show on my sandwich.

I think it's cloudy with a chance of death And the meatballs I like it. Yeah, well not that they think from West as well

Number four, this is this morning. A pretty significant escalation may have happened when Russia reportedly and you can give me an update. Reportedly it's fine. So there's some debate right now Ukrainian officials are saying it was an ICBM and there's an unnamed Western official is what it was just appearing on CNN said it was not an ICBM that was launched.

So I'm not wearing a pencil. Thanks. Well, that does matter because let's say if Ukraine is lying, then they're lying about something that would be a very serious escalation. Correct. If it is an ICBM, and this is why people are a mistrusting of both sides. Like I said, I've said in the past, I have no love or sympathy for Putin. I think he actually is a totalitarian prick.

But both countries are very, very, very corrupt. Ukraine was one of, if not the, money laundering capitals of the world before this, depending on the year. And of course, Russia is as Russia does. So we don't know who's telling the truth, but Ukraine's saying ICBM. Other reports saying no it wasn't, but there was, we do know, some kind of a missile fired at NEPR.

Ukraine says that Russia fired an intercontinental ballistic missile at a central city in Ukraine. It'd be the first use of an ICBM in combat since its development in the Cold War.

to when Donald Trump is going to move into the White House. And I think that you are understanding that if there is going to be any kind of a conversation down the line about a ceasefire or some kind of broader settlement, each side wants to have the best possible negotiating position. They want to be in the strongest possible place. And just because it's really cool, here's a reported look at Scary. ICBM are not the reentry.

you

Looks like stranger things. Now, it's terrifying. The reason that this is pivotal, and hopefully we can get some updates while we're here, because we don't know what's true. Two sides are giving us two different stories here, Ukraine and then the Western official. It would be unprecedented if it is, in fact, an ICBM, because this would be the first time that basically, this has developed, this has been developed to technology, carry a nuclear payload.

It can travel up to, I believe, 18,000 miles per hour. When they're coming down, good luck stopping them. 18,000 miles per hour. That's for the Iron Dome. Very, very difficult to intercept. Yeah. And so that's the update. I get that it's pretty complicated. Yeah, it is kind of complicated. But I can simplify all this conflict for you guys, if you don't mind.

All right, so the kangaroos like Russia right and they're like they're holding on to Ukraine's land as the dog and then Ukraine runs over like hey let go of my land dog let go and then Russia's like what are you gonna do about it and Ukraine's like pow that's what I'm gonna do about it and hit you and go back and then Russia's like oh oh yeah oh yeah all right watch me then watch me I'm gonna get my nukes and Ukraine's like no you won't you won't do it

And honestly, sometimes you just need to take a bird's eye view. That is probably the most accurate distillation of what's going on there. Yeah, they call me the, uh, uh, the thing. So, let's just pull a Biden with simple Jack. They come with a great philosopher. Yes. Yeah, they, they, hey, by the way,

So this brings us to what I think is very interesting here. According to Reuters, I believe this was released last evening and it was trending everywhere. Putin has said that he is open to peace negotiations, but only with Trump.

Why is that so funny? Because he's gonna negotiate with Biden. Yeah, exactly. It's like he'll forget whatever we talked about. He's there for two more months. Oh, Joe, somebody wake up, Joe. So here he is.

Here's what the Kremlin is proposing, okay, to freeze the conflict at the current front lines, okay, to divide control, and this is the pivotal one that, you know, it's very broad, so we'll have to know how this plays out. Divide control of the four eastern regions.

that Ukraine abandons all plans to join NATO. And then they're going to be asking mostly that Ukraine limits the size of their military, and they do want, again, this is all just sort of reportedly, they want to ensure unrestricted use of the Russian language in these areas of Ukraine, which, look,

Again, I feel like you always say, oh, don't absolutely despise Putin. Yep, absolutely. But the fact is that right there tells you there are enough ethnic Russians in areas of Ukraine who if they were living under the oppressive rule of punishment for language use, I know this because I was raised in Quebec. It's an English country, but in Quebec they have French language laws. They actually have the language police where

You can be fined. Your business can be shut down. If the French writing is not, I think it's now at 2.5 times the size of your English writing, even if you're in an English city with mostly English customers. Because I had one mom born, sorry, one parent born, not two moms. My mom was born in Quebec. If you have one parent, even an English-speaking parent born in Quebec, you have to go to French school. They thought I was slow. They switched me to English school. Later on, turns out I was still slow.

I had an English-American father and one Canadian mother, and that law was, okay, you have to go to French school. So it is something that you will have people in that region going, hey, look, we do feel oppressed. And that tells you that it's not just Putin who's been orchestrating the protests and the rebellion, that there are people there enough for it to be a problem. These do outline some terms. Some of these are reasonable. Some of them may not be, but it's important to note, like this only ends.

this conflict. It only ends with some kind of a compromise or the complete devastation of one of these countries.

There really is no in-between. And that compromise is where you just have to pick the compromise that you're willing to live with. And the issue here is Ukraine has been turning down compromise after compromise. But they've basically said no compromise whatsoever. Not saying the offers that have been made are necessarily legitimate or one that should be taken. But Ukraine has made it quite clear they won't take any. And why would you if you have a never-ending supply of funding?

That does not create a scenario for peaceful talks and maybe that's why Zelensky said that he actually believes that Donald Trump could help end the war. I believe that the war will end.

And it will not end in the abstract, but there is no exact date. However, the world ends faster with the policy of the steam that will now lead the White House. This is their approach, their promise to their society. And it is also very important to them.

So are you serious? Yeah, so small update. So the only thing that will say is that Russia has not come out and denied that this is an ICBM right now. So we're scouring kind of that, like that Russia basically, I don't even know if they would though. That's my only problem with this because let's say that you didn't fire an ICBM, right? Yeah, they had multiple reentry vehicles. Obviously you could see the different kind of explosions or lights.

If I was Russia, I'd be like, yeah, we did it. Did we do it? It doesn't matter. Right. You know, they don't have to say anything an unnamed Western source. Right. Already said, you know, it was not the ICBM. Do not worry. No, I don't. I really don't know what to believe on that other than, you know, I would believe the reporting initially and say, okay, well, okay, Russia's not denying it that maybe maybe it really was. Here's the thing though. There is escalation going on.

Of course. And we're not, we're not to whatever, 1,000 and 10 days ago. Sorry, we're almost, you know, this giant, almost like going on three years into a war. Yeah. So we can't just turn back the clock. You're right. It has to be a negotiated settlement. People want to act and I get it. You want to kick out an invader. I totally understand. Of course. If Mexico invaded, you know, Texas, that's the exact same way. It'll never happen though. But that's, I know.

I would feel the same way. You used to imagine the terror, all the gun-toting Texans against the army of weed-whackers. I know, we'd take care of them. All the gun-toting Mexican American Texans. Yes, exactly. We beat them when we weren't even a part of the nation. Anyway, so nonetheless, I understand that people want that, but that's not where we are.

No, it's not. I'm sorry to say that, but that is not where we are. And it's not like we haven't had these ethnic groups in other countries get kind of tied into a country after some kind of a conflict in the past. This has happened multiple times, a lot of times in Europe. Well, there's a lot that we don't know. There is one thing, though, that I know for certain. And I want you to hold me to this. I can tell you exactly what the left is going to do.

with an incoming Trump administration dealing with this conflict. It's time for a prediction.

All right, call me to the mat if I'm wrong. Remember this election was Donald Trump, World War III. That's what the left said. Democracy is at stake. He's a Putin puppet. So here's the thing. It's very clear that Putin doesn't want to talk or negotiate with Biden. He doesn't respect him. Now, for all of Putin's flaws, okay, and there are many flaws, he does revile a lot of the West for, for the same reason that the West reviles Putin. So here's what I think really bothers him and he's communicated this a few times.

where people go, hey, this is a guy all of his financial gain is ill-gotten, right? You don't become a billionaire like that when your people are still oppressed, like this is not honest, this is corruption. And what he's doing is going, yes, but you do. That's exactly, the Bidens are not, so he doesn't have a problem with, I should say,

I don't think he's as bothered by being accused of corruption where he goes, yeah, but you're basically oligarchs in the West, too. It's an entirely corrupt system. He has said that there is a swamp. There is an establishment in DC, and he doesn't believe that Donald Trump, he believes that Donald Trump is uniquely not a part of it.

And you know what? You believe that too, even though it was on the left, because you said that he was a maverick. You said that he would go rogue. You said that he was unpredictable. Well, that's something that I think other dictators kind of see as a positive in the sense that they can negotiate with someone. I believe that Putin thinks if he sits down with Biden, if he sits down with Harris, it doesn't matter what they say. They're just going to line the pockets of defense contractors no matter what, and so it's a fruitless endeavor.

He's clearly not going to do anything significant with Biden. He clearly is hoping for something better with Donald Trump. If Donald Trump comes in and this conflict de-escalates, or my God, if there actually is a ceasefire.

The same people who said that he would bring us World War III, I guarantee you, will say, see, he's a puppet for Putin. If there's any kind of a compromise, which we all know there has to be, there has to be a compromise for there to be peace. Ukraine will not be happy with everything, neither will Russia. The left will accuse Donald Trump of being a puppet for Putin if any land is conceded.

if any concessions are allowed. They will say, look, this is a man who does the strong arming of dictators. He's just as bad as them. Keep in mind they said that Donald Trump was going to bring us World War III. Those same people will then condemn Donald Trump for effectively avoiding World War III in a way that the Democrat establishment couldn't.

Call me. Call me to the mat on that. I guarantee you, that's what will happen if we end up with some kind of a piece of green. Yeah, and I think it's plain to see. Now, there have been some people that have gone over to Russia and have done a very bad job of representing the United States interest. And they've looked like a little bit of a puppet for Russia in some ways, but they were called a puppet before they went.

Right. So I don't believe the argument as well from the left. You can point out specific actions and say, doing this specific thing. You know, like, I hated when Tucker Carlson was like, these groceries are great in this train station. Yeah, they've got great train stations in North Korea, too, if they show you the right ones, OK? Like, I'm not saying, like, the entire country is going to be like that, OK? So maybe you should know better than to go and extol the virtues of what the country is doing. Now,

The problem is they were calling Tucker a plant for Russia before he went. Right. It used to be the policy that when you have enemies, when you have global players that could potentially get out of control and do some crazy things and throw world order out of whack to the point where wars start all over the place, you talk to them. You make sure that you understand where they're coming from. You try to get a good picture. Even if you disagree, you try to understand where they're coming from so that you can help diffuse the situation or mitigate the damage. Not anymore.

know what we are living through right now is McCarthyism with no basis in fact. A lot of people don't realize that McCarthy was right. There were communists, right? History has proven him to be right. He may have been bombastic. People didn't like to work with him, but he was right about communists and communist sympathizers infiltrating our institutions, largely media, Hollywood, and education. He was right about that. In this case, it's McCarthyism where they just go, oh, you must be a puppet for Putin. Oh, you must be a Russian spy.

And there's no basis in fact. If you just look at this reasonably and pragmatically and go, look, do we want destruction? Do we want nuclear war? Or is there some kind of a compromise that needs to be made here? They will accuse Donald Trump of being a puppet for Putin if peace is struck. That's

That's where he is, damned if he does, damned if he doesn't because my God, imagine, imagine Donald Trump comes in this guy who's the dictator, this guy who's going to bring on, this guy who's going to destroy democracy and he ends a conflict and saves Americans hundreds of billions of dollars. They've got to find a way to vilify him. It must be that him, him and Putin are hand in hand and we're only able to talk about this by the way.

Because we're not beholden to YouTube. We're not beholden to the advertisers there who force you to push the Ukraine talking points or the free and fair election talking points, which we'll get to with Mr. Mitchell as it relates to Rasmussen. And that's because of you, mug club. Thank you so much. Everyone who's been a member all these years, mug club is now rumble premium, rumble premium is mug club where you get everything on rumble premium, including the whole ad-free experience for 99 annually or 999 a month.

Uh, you get this, you get the Friday show, you support my club undercover. This is what keeps the doors open. This is what keeps the lights on. You wanted an alternative to YouTube. Hey, you have the alternative to Facebook out there with X. You have the alternative now to YouTube and it is growing and you can help it grow. You can watch this two years from now. See it take 30, 40% of the share from YouTube and say, Hey, yeah, I helped build that.

Let's get off the Patreon, let's get off the PayPal, let's get off the tip jars, and let's get everyone on the same side here because I'm telling you, the left is absolutely regrouping and it's going to get ugly. Yeah, fun fact, the British are the ones that built the subways that Tucker was expecting.

If Russians brought in the British, could you help us design this fantastic subway? And they're like, look at what we did. It's really hard to navigate the subway because you have to walk around the giant tables all the time. They're everywhere. I don't know what it is there. They're even on the train. Why do you have a table? We don't know. Do you want to go to dining carts? No, the whole cart is dining cart. Large table. We have stools. Now, you want to know how out of touch the left is?

I remember David Hogg. I remember David Hogg. Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, okay. Before I get to that, there was an opinion piece on USA Today titled Gen Z voters were the biggest disappointment of the election. Why did we fail or? And, uh, they were really upset that there was this huge shift toward Gen Z, sorry, Gen Z toward Trump, right? It was 46 Trump 52 Harris, which is really close and occurs nowhere in nature.

with the youngest voting bloc in a country. And with Gen Z men, Trump won them 56 to 42. Wow. With Gen Z men, Trump won them. I wouldn't have been able to fathom this as a millennial, like in the Bush years or the McCain or Romney years. I didn't have a single, aside from family. Green Day told me not to vote for him, dude.

no effects region machine yeah everything they said don't do a lot of rich yep everything it was just a mike it and it tells you that well first off i guess the left doesn't have a corner on on on cool at all isn't by default people are going yeah yeah i don't want to be uh... an outcast of all vote democrat that's a big deal but also just tells you that the democrat party the dnc has completely ignored uh... young man and they've been saying it for a long time

and no one's been listening. So, to save the day coming in, riding out as gender neutral horses, David Hogg, and he tweeted out or Xed out, today I'm meeting with a group of researchers and activists to discuss how Democrats win back young men. Hold on a second, David Hogg. Aren't you one of them? Yeah. Imagine, how wide of touch do you have to be to be a young man and you need a focus group to figure out what young men want?

It's like if Mel Gibson was a woman the whole time in what woman wants. Yes. Yes. And a woman turned into a woman. What questions would you be most interested in asking? And I believe you'd like a video, chef, on Instagram. Now, to be clear, he's considering running for vice chair of the Democratic National Committee. Let that happen.

Oh, wow, what a great career path that is. School shooting to job. And by the way, this tells you, this tells you that, of course, if a young man who was the face of the Democratic Party, and of course, was he a, was he a Sandy Hook or a new town? He's Parkland. Parkland, that's right. He was Parkland. That's how his rise to fame. If someone who has been seen as the face of the youth movement for the Democrats cannot understand why other people his age broke in record numbers for Republican, that tells you that

The Democrat Party, it's not listening. And it's not only not listening, they are proactively cutting out young men. They've vilified young men. It's bad enough to say, we can't hear you. It's worse to say, hey, well, anytime I hear the voice of a young male shut up. And that's what they have been doing. And this is why I've always said, too, look, the right does this with tokenism. I had to introduce conservative wonderkins at CPAC who were 13 years old. I'm going, you guys don't understand this. This is gimmickry.

Yeah. Just a young person does not equal a young demo, right? David Hogg is more out of touch with young male voters than John Stewart, who by the way has had better demo numbers than Trevor Noah than Stephen Colbert. It's not about being young, it's about being relevant and being able to listen. The left is incapable because young or old white men need to shut up and young white men largely are the ones going, you know what? Hey,

I'm not going to be condemned for the rest of my life for an immutable characteristic to use your term. I still have some ideas. I still have some wants and needs. And you know what? I pay my taxes. Imagine how out of touch you have to be. David Hogg is a young man who needs a focus group to ask young men what they want. They picked him based on his victimhood status. Well, they did, basically. But I think that's exactly the point. It's exactly the opposite, David, of what you guys have been selling.

That's what they want. They want nothing to do with you. And think about this, like you're a young man. You have borne the brunt, other than economically, of all of the bad DEI policies, of all of the shut up and sit down, of all of the me to crap, because you're a kid and you're going on a date with a girl at 17 and you're like,

Wow. I don't know if something's gonna happen. You've got these kids basically just having to deal with all of this crap and now they have alternative media. They're not going to the mainstream news outlets. They don't have to hear the spin. They just have the David Hogs and the Harry systems that are just paid activists essentially. They really are. And they have turned away from them.

It's complete astroturfing. So, David Hogg, and comment below if you think it's all that complicated as far as what young men want. David Hogg needs a focus group to help him out. And that's why we actually have... David Hogg's is what young men want focus group. The 7 plus 1 most heard answers. This week's 7 plus 1.

Seven plus one, answers heard at the What Young Men Want Conference by David Hogg. Number seven, you know what, Josh? Number seven. Hey, remember George Michael? Yeah, I bet he'd kick your ass. Yeah, okay. Well, that doesn't seem like they're really listening to him. I don't know. Number six, I've met trans women on hormone replacement therapy with more testosterone than you. Number five, what men want?

Tits number four on the contact she'd phone number. I actually gave you the number to a Ben again. Oh, it doesn't seem like they're answering the questions. This just seems like they're trolling David Hoggs a little bit. Number three, see response number five. Oh, that's right. It was tits.

It's number two. David, maybe you'd understand this better if you cosplay as a submissive cuck dominated by a strong female figure and I cosplay as the guy who leaves you tight up and goes to Hooters number one.

Four, number five. Number one, Josh. I bet you think we won a 2025 Jaguar. Oh, yeah. Well, you know what, they seem overly upset. And the plus one response heard at the what young men want focus group from David Hogg. You've heard of the dog whisperer? How about the horse whisperer? Well, you're just a faggot. That's been this week's Seven Plus One. Yo, forgot Civan in the chamber.

My gosh, you know. We went through this quickly. We were so worried. We had so many stories. We were like, we gotta cut it down. Laying the brain's list is mine. He was like, I'm gonna want to talk about this with Russia. I'm like, I know, but we have a guest and we have to, you know, the guest has a heart out. We only have so much time. He's like, I spent six hours on this. So you just cut it down in 10 minutes. And we wrote that other seven plus one. That's true. We do another seven plus one. Hey, Gerald, catch.

that's close it was i was better than i did well i guess if you know what we stayed in we probably do have time then to uh... get to the second we were gonna uh... we were going to uh... yeah you want to do that yeah you know let's go quickly uh... jasmine crockett is also a representative of uh... to blame the brand in your snap

before we get to Mr. Mitchell. You voted for Rasmussen. It was okay. Wednesday, this Texas Democratic representative, so Jasmine Crockett, went on not just a racist tirade, but a very dumb one.

is because you can then misuse words like oppression. There has been no oppression for the white man in this country. You tell me which white men were dragged out of their homes. You tell me which one of them got dragged all the way across an ocean and told that you were gonna go and work. We were gonna steal your wives. We are gonna rape your wives. That didn't happen. That is oppression.

We didn't ask to be here. We not the same migrants that y'all constantly come up against. We didn't run away from home. We were stolen. So yeah, we are going to sit here and be offended when you want to see here and act like, and don't let it escape you. That it is nighting on this side of the aisle telling us people of color on this side of the aisle, that all of the ones being oppressed.

that y'all are the ones that are being harmed well for starters um... i think the white man on white men there understand that if they yelled at you the way you yelled at them they would be charged with a hate crime so we're talking about today in your behavior is uh... let's just put it it's on adult it's on becoming on your character also you're a stupid person because you don't seem to understand the fact that the united states is not uniquely responsible for creating slavery we didn't invent it

And we didn't steal people. We weren't even the best at it. No, this is according to the New York Times, you go to Cornell West, people tell you it's a much higher number, at least 90% of slaves were sent to the New World already enslaved by Africans and sold to European traders. So if you want to take it out with someone, like in other words, before evil Westerners who ended slavery, if early on in this timeline, you went back, they would have said, good, oh good, more slaves.

That would have been the reaction in the homeland that you talk about being stolen from. They kidnapped you. There. They enslaved you. Slavery is wrong. But to act as though you were stolen from a peaceful life, you, of course not. But I mean, even your ancestors is simply inaccurate. And by the way, just so you have the number, 90%, that means that Africans themselves had already enslaved and traded around 11 million slaves.

to the Islamic world. And you may not know this, but over a million Europeans were actually enslaved off the Mediterranean coast largely as part of the North African slave trade. That's why a lot of these towns are built up with defensive walls. So it wasn't just racially based slavery was simply the law of the land. Here's another fun fact. You may not know this.

According to Herbert L. Byrd, Jr., who's a black man, that's important. The Irish preceded Africans as slaves in the New World, meaning the Irish were slaves before

In fact, we didn't say African Americans. We didn't have a similar... They were enslaved before black people in this country. And many people don't know that was actually the original marketing campaign ill-fated for enslaved charms. It did not go well. It was shaped by... The marshmallows are potatoes. That's just... I mean, they're like, they're after me lucky chains.

They're gonna take our chains and our jobs. I hope they do a maid for TV movie about me Roach.

Now where's my wife and I like to punch her in the face? Can you imagine? Do you imagine the Irish split? You know the Irish split. They're like, no, screw this. Well, they used to pay slave hands, especially in beer. And that just made the Irish more feisty. And it's like, what are we doing? Guys, y'all are fighting. Whoa, okay. Who the fuck is that guy? I know. Oh, yeah. So I say, could you go to that field? I don't give a fuck.

Well, kill your own damn failed, you're giving me better what you think would happen. The entire- The all of us are gonna fight you now. The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy- The other guy-

Almost as good as a handy-up. Huh? Yeah? What's that? Oh, he's gonna beat me now. You hear that? He's gonna beat me all right. Let me take the most impractical fighting stance ever.

This is okay to make fun of. It is okay, because they're white. Because they're white. They're white slaves. And they're Gerald's mascot. Yes, exactly. Oh, it's a failed franchise for college. Shut up with your Notre Dame factory. And just like the Irish slaves, Notre Dame replaced the Irish players with black players.

That's not true. They did part of the truth. I guess there's no place for an Irishman like me anymore. I do run a 5-8-40. That's... That's not quite fast enough. No, you can play quarterback or tight end. That's right. We know what I was. My vertical is four. Left out. Can we get different slaves? So anyway, there you go. Somebody could put that. Yes, collector. Come on!

I'm just not gonna go with it. You can't use something that you didn't experience that you're wrong about as far as the premise for the statements you are met. You can't use that to treat people abusively. Especially when your great-great-grandfather's name is Davey. Yes.

It's just, it's, it's, uh, there you go. So Crockett, all right. You can expect more of that grandstanding. And, uh, now it is time to actually, uh, get to our guests. But before that, look, let me just, let me just set this up for you. Okay. For people who don't know, um, there were some big misses in this, uh, polling channel, the polling in this election, because remember the conversation was, well, there was a secret Trump voter. And then even though, you know, allegedly Donald Trump lost in 2020, he's still outperformed the polls by significant margin.

So, the pollster's got a lot of that wrong. And the question before this election was, well, we're looking at, are they going to get it wrong with Donald Trump a third time? The answer is unequivocally yes, okay? There were some huge ones that were wrong, like the A and Seltzer, Iowa poll. By the way, she's since retired.

was off by 16 points. Marist, very respected, was off, they had Harris plus four, right? Morning consult had Harris plus two, and all along the trail morning consult, which I believe is highly rated by a lot of these other pollsters, sort of aggregates, they had these outlying polls of Kamala Harris winning. It was always morning consult.

Yes. Oh, always. Morning consult, Morris Bloomberg is one of the really bad ones too. And Rasmussen, who the left is accused of being right, you know, right wing extremism, I guess. You just see it all the time. They were the closest.

They were closest to predicting the actual result. The margin for air with their pulling was only 1.9 points. Nate Silver made some accusations, so we wanted to have this man on. The brains behind the pulling outfit of Rasmussen, you can follow him on X, mark underscore R underscore. Mitchell, let's bring on Mark Mitchell.

Mr. Mitchell, how are you, sir? Doing really well. Yeah, we nailed it. Yes, you did. He's really nailed it. You really didn't nail it. And for people who don't know, I just want to make sure that I didn't get anything wrong that I just said, we always make the references available so people can go and see your polling data and see the RCP average. Nate Silver questioned your findings, right? Five 38, this used to be the guru. What did he try and accuse you of or suggest?

Yeah, let me just talk about accuracy first. We're at 1.7 points in the national popular vote. We've been putting out for weeks and weeks and weeks that the race was two points and everybody measures their own accuracy with their final call. But we were all alone in August and September when the pollsters were at peak lying, peak psychological operation to create a fake lead for Kamala Harris.

What was different this time, the posters actually weren't as bad as they were before, and it's because I decided to be a loudmouth back in July and August and call all these people liars and they didn't take it well. So you got Nate and you got 538. They're actually two separate entities right now, 538. Check this out because of ideological reasons a year ago. Can I have a quick question? Just a quick question. It's 538 now. Is it under the ABC umbrella or is Nate under the ABC umbrella?

So Nate now has a little newsletter he puts out and it's basically the same numbers and 538's ABC News Disney and quite frankly they're probably on the chopping block right now because it looks like all the sudden on ABC it's no bueno to talk bad about people in the Trump circle and literally they're ideologues. Okay so 538 kicked you out and I just wanted people to know because it's not just 538 that's that's ABC Disney right that's really what you were you were cut out from so

Yeah, yeah, the same ABC Disney that just had Sonny Hostin read out apology about Matt Gaetz on air. So there's this new sheriff in town, definitely. So yeah, the people were basically shilling for Democrats and Nate's no different because real clear politics just takes all the polling and puts it into an average and reports it very straight, unbiased guys. And yet, Nate,

Says that they're going to try and take all the polling and unskew it and make it less biased. Well, if you look at the numbers, they actually added more left bias. So he's bad at the one thing that he thinks he's supposed to do. And at this point, it's just embarrassing. He's just a complete clown. He's like a law count now.

What did he accuse you or suggest that you were colluding with the Trump campaign or something like that? Because your polls obviously were more favorable toward Donald Trump. And by the way, you didn't have Donald Trump winning in every state. There were some times where there were swing states where you had them down by one. But what was it that Nate Silver leveled at you? Because I do have your response here.

Yeah, we had no bias. In fact, if anything, we leaned a little bit to the left. We were about 0.7 points, too favorable to Harris and the swing states. And I was telling people that in our videos, I thought Trump would outperform. There are no right-wing pollsters. There are none. There are accurate independent pollsters and everybody else that shills for Democrats.

So Nate put this piece out in the New York Times, the same New York Times, by the way, that a week before Election Day attacked real clear politics. That's like attacking the Pope in the industry. It's just absolutely ridiculous. And he talked about how the pollsters did better this time. Well, yeah, because I was shaming them into trying to save their own credibility.

And he didn't mention us at all about accuracy. And then when he did mention us, he said, oh, well, there's these right wing pollsters that were coordinating with the Trump campaign. Well, here's the deal. Like, this is media. I produce content. This I give results to people.

Under and bargain. Oh, so hey this polls coming out We have a whole subscription model around it and the only rag that ran with that story was the new new republic AP AP and Reuters none that would touch it and so he used that when I think what was seen is that and seltzer may have been colluding with the campaign no mention of that in his article so it was basically just the most ridiculous thing and Take it yeah

Can I ask you beyond being 16 points off, which is almost embarrassing for Stilter? Do you have anything else that would suggest that she actually did actively, maybe collude or was in communication with the DNC?

That's the problem with the industry is that it's impossible to know for sure. There's no matter of transparency that can make up for unethical or lying pollsters, it's just not. You never know that even somebody that puts their data out there, they could have deleted data points. But what I will tell you is that she did have a poll out in July that had Trump up 18 points and basically Rich Barris found out about it and shamed her because she was spiking the poll.

So right there, absolutely, no bueno. We would never do that. We release every number we get. And so even there alone is enough to say, well, there's an ideological reason she probably suppressed those results. And we know she was the Iowa poll she put out. There was Harris plus three. The whole internet was buzzing about it for two weeks. I mean, everybody was chuckling about this poll that was coming that was going to save Kamala Harris and show that the polls were under emphasizing their support. When a poll is the number one trending thing on Twitter,

Like, there's a problem. Yeah, no, I'm sorry. It makes no sense. And when you look at, you combine it with the fact that I don't know if you're as aware of this, but after the election when Donald Trump won, leftists and a lot of independent creators on YouTube, they saw a massive drop in their subscriptions, right? People have said, I'm done with this. And so what you do see is that liberals, as a group, are front runners. They don't do well with adversity because in 2021, that election happened. We saw a spike.

in mug club subscribers because people got mad. They got galvanized. I said, OK, well, what do we have to do here? The left quit on mass. And so it makes sense that they want to give themselves that left. No, no, no, look, look, look, look. You're winning. You're winning. That's their mentality.

Yeah, a lot of social validation and proof needed. I think there's not a lot of confidence because they don't embrace reality. I think that's really the big key. One of the major stories I think from this whole election was how completely ideologically different people who watch CNN and MSNBC are from just say Fox News and Newsmax viewers. They had totally different issue sets. The number one issue of MSNBC viewers was protecting democracy number two as abortion. Three quarters of them.

And those are basically like, oh, Trump's going to take this away from you. Whereas the prices and the border really are things that Biden did take away from people. So they're just literally tapped into this fear of missing out. And that's what they were trying to do. Listen, Kamala Harris was never trying to change any voters' minds. They were just trying to bully people into social proof to follow the movement. Like she went on Fox News. She could have changed people's minds. Not a single word she said was coordinated to that.

yeah you know she was running um... you know the campaign of fifteen twenty years ago and the people don't want perock obama anymore because they hate the government yeah i know it was it was incredibly uh... poorly conduct not conducted she just gave a piss poor performance let's be honest but if this is one thing to look i came at this you can go back to two thousand eight and see like i think it was a blue bed sheet of the stand-up comment really before that come this is an entertainer but we provide all of our references uh... we have an undercover unit so we've really expanded the operations here on election night

You know, we wanted to make sure that we had all the data that anyone else had at CNN at Fox News, you know, all the stuff, Reuters AP News, why are we paid for all of it? We had an election integrity map. So this is a big undertaking cost us millions of dollars. And so we had access to analytics in real time. And so it mirrors what you experienced quite a bit because I think you said they left you out of some of their articles as far as including pollsters. Well, the same thing if you look at actually a lot of these articles afterwards about numbers on election night.

number one of the bullet was actually this program it wasn't even close and certainly as far as hours watched but more importantly we were doing this for the first time and we made calls seventy-five for example this was the first place here to call georgia we didn't just call georgia we called georgia and the change and the margin at which it would end so we didn't do any polls beforehand uh... but that i'd like to show you a clip um... but of what happened that night and then it talk about how it mirrors what you've been going through with the blackouts of coverage

We are calling Georgia right now. Tell everybody for Donald Trump. Yeah, just so you know, this is the first place to do it. Share this on social, let people know we feel confident you can hold us to this Georgia. We're doing the opposite of Bret Baer because we're looking at some trends that we see that I know legacy media sees, but they're too nutless to make the call.

I guess you're supposed to encode the number in there where we said it was a three-something percent, but we predicted it was going to close around between two and two point five. So we said, this is actually where it will close. It's exactly where it closed. Look, it wasn't that complicated to do, Mr. Mitchell. We just did the work. How much of this do you think is ideologically motivated versus maybe these people also just suck at their job?

A little column A, a little column B, I think there's so many different levers in which like bias and lying can be inserted. You could put out a perfectly good poll and then have a lying mainstream media cherry pick your results like the Hill did with Fairleigh Dickinson University or like I think in New York Times case they have a good pollster but he reports up I think to a flaming leftist managing editor that will not let him put out things positive to Trump.

I think it really comes down to it's the status quo, and they can't stand a non-status quo candidate, and they have to array against them. And quite frankly, I'm surprised the polling was as good as it was. You mentioned like some of these people, Morning Console, Reuters Ipsos was even worse. They went from Trump plus one when Kamala Harris kind of nointed all the way out to Harris plus six.

Right. And luckily, when they picked Harris, I said, you know what? They're going to lie a lot. And we did something we never did before. We started putting out daily results in the in the middle of July. And because of that, I could tell you the race did not change. This wasn't like a 2016 where people don't know the candidates and stuff gets dropped left and right. There was not a single thing that moved the numbers, not Trump getting shot, not even the debate.

And so just to see these massive shifts to the left and then be able to go in and look at the polling results in the cross tats and say, Oh, it's because they're definitely oversampling Trump, the range Republicans and they're not getting independent. Their number one issue among independents is abortion. That's not true. Right. It's kitchen table issues. So they create the world that they want to see. And they again got clowned by, listen, we have a super small team morning consults got hundreds of millions of revenue and they put out

We put out almost as much polling as them, and their polling is just absolutely ridiculous. Like you said, I mean, we were saying Trump was going to win comfortably in July in August. We were the first one saying that Trump would win the national popular vote because our polling said it the whole time. Yeah, I remember. But the betting markets kind of saw it coming to in the middle of September. And in September, even like, you know, Atlas Intel, OK, yeah, sure, they're accurate. They're great. The betting markets already said the race was Trump's before they even dropped their first set of state polls. So can I ask you something?

Do you think that considering the shellacking at the left is taken, right? Do you expect them to correct it all if only out of self-preservation where they go, okay, we can't just bury our head in the sand. We've been wrong three major election cycles, right? The midterms there were an outlier because of COVID and all the stuff that had kind of happened. We need to get this right because we're doing nobody any favors by giving them a false sense of confidence. Do you think they'll course correct or do you think they're going to continue smashing their wiener in the door?

This is the theme of the next four years is because they're all flaming ideologues. Not all of them, but every single one of these companies has problems. They're having a hard time fixing. Look at Disney. They want to make money, but just the way they're set up right now, they can't. And what you were talking about on election day was very true. The mainstream media was driving the narrative the entire time. For the last month, everybody was responding to them like a laser pointer, but they were losing those battles on Twitter.

uh... basically everybody was fighting an info war for trump on twitter and then on election night the mainstream media died because just like you said i was on a dozen streams i didn't hear anybody talking about any news channel calling any race at all and now all the sudden look at them they're all just absolutely dead ms nbc's probably gonna get spun off and sold cnn's on the chopping block uh... i think this is going to probably spin out some stuff

And so it comes down to do they dig in or correct. And I don't know if they can correctly, CNN started to get other voices on. It was not good for the ratings because it needs to be an echo chamber. And so that's what we have to see. But I'll tell you right now, it's all on Twitter now. It's just a totally different paradigm in just two weeks. And now everybody is what's great about it is the Trump picks. We're just putting out polling out today, like 81% of Republicans rate Trump excellent or good in the pick 83%.

It's a massive number, it's because they're finally getting what they want. And they're saying, oh, Matt Yates is crazy. Oh, Hex has got an AST tattoo. Nobody cares. Nobody cares at all. No, exactly. Nobody really cares. And we're like, oh, hey, even if it, and by the way, all charges are dropped, there's nothing credible. But people are like, wait, wait. So you mean he went to a Broadway show with a hooker? Even if that happened, I still don't care.

That's where we are and it didn't happen. But I still wouldn't care. We're going to continue this here on Mugg Club Rumble Premium. If that's OK, I know it's rasmusinreports.com. You are mark underscore R underscore Mitchell on X. Can you stay with us for another few minutes? Yeah, I'd love to. All right. People watching right now, you click that button. That's what allows all of this to continue. And you know, oh, that's right. Mr. Mitchell before before he came on is like, huh, if this is on YouTube, can we discuss like election interference? Like, oh, yeah, you can discuss that because we don't really care. We just dump it on YouTube. Click Rumble Premium. Let's go right now. Bye.

All right.