A snake pit of jockeying egos in a cornucopia of back biting
en
November 26, 2024
TLDR: Republican overreach to secure permanent power inspires pro-democracy pushback; Trump team goon squad fight and grift each other.
In this insightful episode, Rachel Maddow delves into the complex political landscape of North Carolina, focusing on the Republican Party's controversial maneuvers post-election. With critical implications for democracy, Maddow shares her thoughts on how the actions taken by North Carolina's Republican legislators exemplify broader national trends concerning power consolidation.
Key Themes and Insights
The Origin of the Bill
- Initially, a modest bill aimed at reforming dentistry laws transformed into a significant legislative maneuver by the Republican Party in North Carolina.
- The bill aimed to regulate dentist exams and outline conditions for license revocation but was radically altered to serve political ends following a poor election performance by the Republicans.
The Republican Party's Election Struggles
- Despite Trump winning North Carolina in the presidential race, the Republican Party faced substantial defeats at nearly all other statewide levels:
- Lost races for governor, lieutenant governor, attorney general, and more.
- Their previous supermajority in the state legislature was dismantled, diminishing their ability to override gubernatorial vetoes.
Radical Legislative Changes
- Republicans repurposed the original dental bill into a "Hurricane Relief Bill," aimed not at aiding storm recovery but at consolidating their remaining power:
- New provisions stripped the Democratic governorship of crucial appointive powers over the judiciary.
- Power shifts regarding election oversight were made to favor Republican interests, notably placing control under a Republican state auditor.
Public Backlash and Protests
- The abrupt changes triggered widespread protests at the North Carolina State Legislature, highlighting citizen discontent with perceived power grabs:
- Groups including clergy and advocacy organizations joined forces to oppose the changes, echoing a significant local outcry.
- Notably, the Democratic governor, Roy Cooper, is expected to veto the bill, testing whether public pressure can withstand the Republican majority's attempts to override.
Implications for Democracy
A Test for Democratic Principles
- Maddow emphasizes that the maneuvers in North Carolina serve as a microcosm for larger national struggles for democratic integrity:
- Ordinarily, winning political office implies a transfer of corresponding powers, something currently undermined by these legislative actions.
- This push against democracy mirrors broader Republican strategies nationwide, particularly under Trump's influence.
The Danger of Autocratic Styles
- Maddow draws parallels between local actions in North Carolina and emerging national autocratic tendencies:
- Discusses efforts by Trump and Republicans in Washington to eliminate traditional checks and balances across the government.
- Highlights troubling signals of "autocratic breakthrough," where political powers are entrenched to ensure permanent party dominance.
Conclusion
- The episode presents a vivid examination of the interplay between politics, legislation, and democracy in the United States. Maddow illustrates how the actions in North Carolina are not merely a state issue but part of a critical national narrative concerning democracy's future.
- The call to action is clear: vigilance and citizen engagement will be crucial in ensuring that democratic practices are upheld against partisan maneuvers and power grabs.
Was this summary helpful?
I'm really happy to have you here. All right, so it started out as a bill about the rules for being a dentist. And it said so explicitly in the title, a bill to be entitled an act making various changes to the laws of dentistry. Before reading this bill today, I had never before even thought about there being laws of dentistry.
But there are laws of dentistry, apparently, and this new legislation was going to tighten up those laws. Laws about, for example, letting you do your dentist exams on mannequins, spelled M-A-N-I-K-I-N-S, mannequins instead of on real people. That seems nice for the real people, not nice for the mannequins. Also laws about letting the powers that be take away your dentistry license on account of your drunkenness.
Lots of important ways of tightening up the laws around dentistry. So that was the bill. And act making various changes to the laws of dentistry. And that is how that bill started. But then it changed. It changed a lot.
North Carolina is one of the states where Republicans did not do as well as they wanted to in this past election. Yes, Trump did still win the state of North Carolina, which I think was the thing they most cared about. He won by about three points in the presidential race in North Carolina. But even as Trump won the presidential race there, the Republican candidate in North Carolina for governor
He lost that race in the state of North Carolina. The Republican candidate lost the lieutenant governor's race in North Carolina. The Republican candidate lost the attorney general's race in North Carolina. The Republican candidate lost the secretary of state's race in North Carolina.
Also, the Republican candidate to be state schools chief. This is a race I was particularly keeping my eye on. The Republican candidate lost that race in North Carolina too. The reason I was watching that one closely is because that was the race where the Republican candidate for schools chief said she wanted a pay-per-view public televised execution of former President Barack Obama. She also demanded the execution of President Biden, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer,
Anthony Fauci, a former New York governor, the current North Carolina governor, a member of Congress from Minnesota. Also, she wanted to execute Bill Gates.
I mean, honestly, it was a lot from her, but she was the Republican Party's nominee for superintendent of public schools for the state of North Carolina this year. And she lost that election, along with almost all the Republican candidates for statewide office in North Carolina. So yes, in North Carolina this year, Trump won the presidential race, but Republicans lost almost everything else in the state.
heading into this election, North Carolina Republicans held a super majority in that state legislature. But in this election, they lost that super majority. Democrats made enough inroads in that state legislature this year in this election that Republicans in North Carolina no longer have a super majority that allows them to override the veto, for example, from the governor.
But that is where the laws of dentistry come into this story. Because Republicans in North Carolina, after this election, where they did not do as well as they wanted to, they know they're about to lose their super majority in the state legislature. And they know that Democrats just won almost every statewide elected office in the whole state.
Republicans know this is coming. And so in the face of that oncoming change, Republicans took this bill making various changes to the laws of dentistry. They took the laws of dentistry bill and they turned it into something very much not that, which is probably good news for drunken dentists, bad news for mannequins.
but it's also it's also really big news big audacious news for what republicans are apparently trying to do in north carolina on their way out the door
This is footage from the North Carolina State Legislature. People being cleared out of the gallery in the state legislature for protesting against what the Republicans are trying to do with this bill that started off a dentistry bill and that it's turned into something much more radical. Republicans took this laws of dentistry bill. They gutted it. They took out all the dentists stuff. They then decided they would call it their Hurricane Relief Bill.
You remember all the horrible storms in Western North Carolina right before the election. They said it would be their hurricane relief bill, but what the bill actually does is it changes the state government in North Carolina. So all the state government positions that are about to be held by Democrats will have their power stripped away from them.
The governor of North Carolina, for example, will no longer be allowed to appoint judges as he sees fit. Under this new bill, he will literally be required in certain circumstances to appoint judges that have been approved explicitly by the State Republican Party. The State Republican Party has to approve the Democratic governor's judicial picks.
The attorney general under this bill will not be allowed to oppose anything that is done by the Republicans in the state legislature, even if the attorney general thinks it's against the laws of the state. Power over the administration of elections in North Carolina would inexplicably, would inexplicably be moved wholesale into the office of the state auditor.
The state auditor being in charge of elections, why would Republicans change North Carolina state law? So the state auditor is suddenly the person in charge of elections. Oh, oh, because state auditor is the one race that Republicans won this year in North Carolina. State auditor candidate Dave Balak, he said, I'm only in politics for you, sir. I only, where is Dave?
Anybody that would save, Dave, if you say that, and if you mean that, if you mean that, I'm for you all the way. He has my endorsement. I'm only in politics for you, sir. Imagine saying, I'm only in politics to serve you, sir, to serve Donald Trump. That's the only reason I'm running for office. The only reason I'm interested in politics at all, I am here to serve you as an individual.
That is the one Republican that won his race in North Carolina state government and a statewide race this year. But because they've just got this one guy in statewide office, the auditor, Republicans just rewrote the laws of the state so that that will be the guy who's in charge of the state's elections, even though the state auditor job has nothing to do with elections whatsoever.
It's like putting the dog catcher in charge of the water department. There's just no connection at all, but he is the one Republican, and so now he'll be the election sky.
This is what they have done with the dentistry bill. They hollowed out the dentist stuff, and this is what they've done since the election. And the consequence of that, or one of the consequences thus far, is that North Carolinians have been turning up at the state legislature, filling the gallery in the legislature, shouting down the Republicans while they've been forcing through this last minute action.
after the election hijacked the dentistry bill to try to make sure they can stay in power even after they've been voted out. To stay in power in the administration of state government and the judiciary also to control future elections, right? Because relying on the votes of the people of North Carolina is clearly not a winning strategy of them, so they're trying to work around that so they can stay in power without the people's consent.
North Carolina also elects its state Supreme Court justices. In this election, one Democratic Supreme Court justice appeared to win re-election by a really slim margin, less than 700 votes, somewhere around 700 votes. There's a recount underway in that race right now, because it was such a slim margin. In that recount, Republicans are trying to throw out 60,000 ballots. They're trying to have 60,000 votes not counted in that race.
60,000. That's a lot of people to take away the vote from, right? I mean, but they think they can do it. These are provisional ballots that they say they don't want counted. Part of the reason there's so many, there's 60,000 provisional ballots in this race is because Republicans in the legislature put in place aggressive new restrictions on voting rights in time for this election. And that resulted in a lot of North Carolina voters having to cast provisional ballots.
Now Republicans are fighting to not count those ballots at all as a way to try to take that seat on the state Supreme Court. The people casting their votes thing just has not been working all that great for Republicans in North Carolina. So now Republicans in North Carolina are trying to make sure that votes aren't everything, that there are other ways that they can keep and expand their power.
And we really don't know how this is going to work out in North Carolina. This is a live issue right now. There are Republicans from the western part of the state who voted no on this bill, in part because they were furious that this is what Republicans are calling their hurricane relief bill. It's like a quarter of what the governor asked the legislature for in terms of hurricane relief dollars. It doesn't actually move money.
to where the hurricane hit. It doesn't actually move money to the western part of the state. So some Republicans from the hard hit western part of North Carolina are blocking at this so far, voting no, even though they are Republicans. The Democrats are against this. The protesters in the gallery of the legislature are very much against it. As are groups of North Carolina clergy, faith leaders, groups like the Poor People's Campaign led by the Reverend William Barber,
the Democratic governor of North Carolina, Roy Cooper, he is presumably gonna veto this thing. And then, you know, wait to see whether all the public pressure against it, whether the revulsion, even among some Republicans about what they're trying to do here, will be enough to allow his veto to stand or whether Republicans might be able to override that veto in the last days of their super majority before they are pushed out. So we shall see, this is a live issue right now.
And I start with this tonight, not just because this is an important story for North Carolina, right? This audacious, small D, anti-democratic power grab by Republicans there. It's not just important for an important state.
It's also kind of a test. It's a character test, right? To see if we've really got the stomach right now for this kind of a fight. A fight in a very practical, very blunt sense for small D democracy because obviously that is what's being messed with here in North Carolina, right? If you win an election to take
office as an elected official, you winning the election means you should also get the powers of that job, right? There's nothing about administering elections that should be handed to partisan actors so that one party has a leg up in trying to win future elections. That's just not the way it's supposed to work. Trying to force those things is an anti-democratic, anti-small-D democratic power grab.
But that happening so bluntly and so obviously causing revulsion in so many people in North Carolina, that of course is also happening in the larger context of what's happening in the country. And we are seeing with the Republican Party ascending in Washington, we are seeing a really radical effort not to just advance and advocate for and plan to implement Republican policies. We're seeing a really radical effort to change the American system of government.
to consolidate power in one man's hands, to consolidate power within the executive branch of government. All this talk you've heard about firing huge swabs of the federal government, wiping out whole departments, firing career law enforcement people, firing whole categories of civil servants. All of that is about consolidating power in the executive branch. So there is no source of authority or judgment within the federal government except for the one guy at the top, except for Trump.
Specifically, you've heard talk about them firing the FBI director, firing the chairman of the Federal Reserve. Those are jobs that don't turn over when the presidency turns over. They're specifically designed to be independent of the political cycle.
so that people in those jobs at the FBI and the Fed, they do what's right for the country and not just what's right for any particular president. But this insistence, this out loud insistence from the Republicans that Chris Ray at the FBI and Jerome Powell at the Fed somehow were going to be fired and replaced by Trump because he's coming in as the new president. That's
That's not how the American system of government is supposed to run. That's about him consolidating his power over the executive branch, including the parts of it that are supposed to be independent from his power and control.
We are also saying, even before the Republicans take power, efforts to consolidate power over the press, not just threatening and intimidating reporters and news organizations, but now saying they're going to use the power of the government to do it, having their presumptive appointees say that news organizations will be reviewed by the federal government according to their editorial decisions on news issues.
We're finally now getting some widespread discussion about their efforts to consolidate power also in just one man over the legislative branch of government. So over the fourth estate, the press, over the executive branch, but also over the legislative branch over Congress, Trump demanding that the Senate not confirm his nominees, threatening to force the Senate to shut down so he can install his nominees without any confirmation hearings or votes.
Right? That is an effort to consolidate his power in such a way that it marginalizes and renders inert and unimportant the legislative branch of government. In that case, specifically the Senate, but it's not just the Senate with Trump's austerity commission, this thing where they're going to cut trillions of dollars out of the budget, an effort headed by eccentric right wing billionaire Elon Musk. In order to do that, they are reportedly planning on seizing for themselves, what's usually called the power of the purse.
taking it away from Congress, just unilaterally cutting and reshaping the whole federal government without Congress being involved at all. So in Washington, as Trump and the Republicans are preparing to take power, Trump is working really aggressively to consolidate all government power in Trump's hands. He's looking to consolidate all the power of the executive branch in his own hands. He's looking to consolidate all power in the government.
over the legislative branch, supposed to be the co-equal branch of government, not going to be co-equal anymore. He's trying to limitalize it, neuter it, make it unimportant, tell them what to do and expect them to do it. He's also trying to do the same thing over the fourth estate, right, the so-called fourth branch of government, the free press. There's also the judiciary, right?
So far, frankly, I think he's been delighted how he's being treated by the third branch of government, by the courts, by the judiciary. So we don't yet see him moving to defy the courts or defy court orders, but don't rest on that. I think it's very possible that that is coming.
I mean, honestly, if we're, I think if you take a wide view of what's happening thus far with Trump taking power, preparing to take power in Washington, you see the efforts to consolidate power in the executive branch to liminalize the legislative branch. I think he's ignoring the judicial branch for now, but watch for it.
Obviously, the efforts to intimidate the press, right? This is all about trying to make sure that he's the only source of authority in the federal government. Honestly, in terms of what to watch for next, I think we need to be watching for something that they call autocratic breakthrough. Autocratic breakthrough is when the party in power uses the power they do have in government to make sure they can never be dislodged from government.
I'll give you a concrete example. You've already seen in the House of Representatives, now that Mike Johnson is back in as Republican House Speaker, they changed the rules in the House to make it much harder to remove him as Speaker.
All right. So that's them digging in, planning to stay for the long run. Now we're here. You're not going to be able to get us out. You've seen Trump quote, joking and quote about expecting to stay in office for a third term once this second term is up. And that's of course against the Constitution. But he keeps repeatedly bringing up, bringing it up, but that's his expectation.
Trump advisor has one-time campaign manager, Steve Bannon, saying things in public about how they're going to be ruling for 50 years. There won't be any way to dislodge them from power. Autocratic breakthrough is when they use the powers they've achieved through winning elections to cement themselves in power so they can't be removed by future elections or by other democratic means.
So we are watching the efforts to consolidate power. We are watching four signs of autocratic breakthrough, trying to entrench themselves in power so they can't be removed. This is just the way these things go. This is how strong men rule. These are the things that they are trying. That said, so far it's not clear that their efforts are going all that great. The fact that they just want these things doesn't mean that they get them. The fact that they're trying these things doesn't mean that they'll succeed.
I mean, we've already seen terrible nominees like Matt Gaetz being laughed off of Capitol Hill and having to have his nomination withdrawn. We're seeing Senate Republicans not yet caving and not yet agreeing to shut themselves down so Trump can have his nominees installed with no confirmation hearings.
The press turning out to be yes, weak need and lily-livered as you might fear in some quarters, but also defiant and professional and aggressive and creative in other quarters.
the American Free Press thus far, for example, has been doing a great job detailing the astonishing conflicts of interest and self-dealing and deep incompetence and lack of qualification, the salacious and even allegedly criminal past dealings of the freak show lineup that Trump has announced as his nominees for high office. And we'll get to some of those this hour.
So his intentions for who he wants to install and for what he wants to do and how he wants to consolidate power so the American government is essentially just the will of one man. Those are just his intention and it's worth being clear that those are his intentions. It's worth reporting on it, following it, being very clear-eyed about the fact that that's what he's trying to do. But just because those are his intentions, it doesn't mean those things are an inescapable fate for us as a country.
Politics still works. Gravity still applies. The rules of nature still work. Each of these things they're trying is likely to be a fight and a test. And it's not just in Washington. It's everywhere there is a push against democracy. Everywhere there is a push against small D democracy. We are seeing that there is a push for it too. Like in North Carolina right now.
Joining us now is North Carolina State Senator Dan Blue. He is the Democratic Leader in the Senate of the Great State of North Carolina. Senator Blue, I really appreciate you making time to be here tonight. Thank you. Thank you for having me this evening, Rachel.
I know the situation in North Carolina, I think as well as anybody watching from a national perspective, you obviously are watching it from inside and much closer up. What should the American people, people watching us right now, understand about what's been characterized as a power grab by Republicans in your state since the election?
Well, you accurately describe it Rachel as a power grab, but it's something more than a power grab. I think it's a tantrum by the Republican leadership in the General Assembly not willing to accept the outcome of an election and not willing to accept the fact that they've lost on some of these elections. And now it's consolidating power. It's taking extraordinary steps to basically grab that power for themselves, taking it out of the
judicial branch, taking it out of the executive branch. In our case, it happens to be the executive branch trying to seize the legislative branch, rather than the executive branch. But it's the same thing that you're witnessing all over the country, just led by a different group here in North Carolina.
I was struck by the footage. It didn't get a lot of national attention, but we were able to look at North Carolina media, local news organizations in North Carolina, a bunch of social media stuff posted by different nonprofit and advocacy groups in North Carolina, and find what I found to be really interesting footage of the pushback by regular citizens. Dozens of protesters seemed actually to kind of interrupt the debate, a debate in which, as I understand it,
no Republican lawmaker actually was willing to speak up to defend these changes. We've seen members of the clergy. We've seen groups like the Poor People's Campaign led by Reverend William Barber speak against it. How would you describe the attention to this in the state and how your constituents are feeling about this and reacting to the bill?
There's great, great attention to it. You described the marches led by Dr. Bobber several years ago. Those people are still around. They're watching what's happening to their government. They don't want the power seized by folk that they don't elect. One of the points that is important to this is that this legislation that was passed last week also takes the power away from the Attorney General.
So that he can't intervene or get involved in certain cases unless it suits the whims of the Republican leadership in the legislature. And so people know that the Attorney General is supposed to protect their interests and intervene on their behalf.
They're protesting all of these powers that are taken from the governor, all of these powers that are taken from other branches, in other places that they've been for half a century or more. And so the decision last week to clear the galleries really took
Everybody out, people who weren't protesting, but everybody who was coming to visit their government to see how it operated, the legislative branch of government. There was no effort to sort between those folks. But you can rest assured that people in North Carolina, the state that started this whole revolution in the United States with the Halifax results in 1776, will still be intimately involved in self-governance.
And regardless of what the elected leadership in the legislature, the Republican leadership, regardless of what they do, that same spirit that hit North Carolina 248 years ago will still prevail. And our people aren't going to take it. We believe very deeply in democracy. And we're going to fight to preserve the institutions that were created to make sure that democracy still prevailed.
North Carolina State Senate, Democratic Leader Dan Blue, Senator Blue, thank you for those closing rousing comments. And thanks for making time to join us tonight. It's good to have you here, sir. Thank you, Rachel. It's been my pleasure. All right. We got much more ahead here tonight. Stay with us.
So here's one of the complaints. This was filed with the Better Business Bureau, quote, after filling out an online form to get health insurance information within three seconds. I began getting bombarded by phone calls. When I asked the representative to stop, she said the auto dialer would not stop until I provided my information. Quote, I don't know how to get them to stop after 18 calls in an hour and a half. I am 64 years old and this is causing me unnecessary stress.
Here's another. Insurance agents repeatedly called my 86-year-old father, who is deaf, has dementia, and lives in an assisted living facility.
This person says this insurance agent somehow convinced his deaf elderly father with dementia to dump his health insurance plan that he'd had for more than 20 years in exchange for a plan that the person on the phone was hard selling him on in these repeated phone calls. The complaint says, quote, clearly this company is conducting fraud and financial elder abuse.
The company that's the subject of these complaints is essentially a telemarketer that targets people who have Medicare. So the company calls people up and tries to convince them that they should dump their Medicare plan run by the federal government and instead switch to a private alternative.
And if the telemarketer is successful in convincing or tricking or berating the old person on the phone into doing that, into agreeing, well then the telemarketer collects a handsome fee from the new insurance company that they've just got this new sign up for. New York Magazine has some great reporting on this out today. The company told the magazine they do not engage in this quote, kind of behavior, excuse me, kind of conduct.
Nevertheless, this telemarketing firm has had dozens of individual complaints waged against it with the Better Business Bureau. It tells you something about how they operate. That said, big picture. Who cares about a litany of heartbreaking elder abuse complaints like that when the company also has a powerful and charismatic celebrity endorser?
Hey everybody, I'm here today at the Medicare Advantage.com help line center. We're in Charlotte, North Carolina here to meet the team helping folks just like you with their coverage options.
Ah, folks, just like you. That, of course, is the TV doctor, Dr. Mehmet Oz. And his enthusiasm for this particular company might conceivably have something to do with the fact that he personally holds hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of stock in some of the companies that provide this private insurance that you might switch people on to if you can convince them to give up their Medicare in repeated, repeated, repeated phone calls.
His financial stake in this matter came to light a few years ago back when Dr. Oz was running as the Trump endorsed candidate for Senate in Pennsylvania campaigning on a platform to privatize all of Medicare.
And that would have all been a lot of baggage to carry into the United States Senate had he won that Senate seat, right? Campaigning to privatize Medicare while he was financially benefiting from such a policy change with his own personal stock holdings, his promotion of Medicare privatization schemes. I mean, perhaps that is what motivated Pennsylvania voters to not elect Mehmet Oz as their United States Senator.
It'd be quite something to drag all that with you into the Senate. It's another thing entirely to drag all that into the federal government because Dr. Oz is now going to be the person in charge of Medicare for the federal government. But that, of course, is what Donald Trump has just announced. He has announced that he is naming Dr. Mehmet Oz as his pick for the next administrator of Medicare and Medicaid.
Yes, with that guy's record on Medicare. Dr. Oz, of course, is the TV doctor who once claimed that red onions can prevent ovarian cancer, green coffee beans or a miracle weight loss cure. He has pushed the false claim that dodgy malaria medicines can treat COVID. And what do you know? He owns a mountain of stocks in related companies, including the makers of the malaria drug. He was talking for COVID.
And he's about to be a major decision maker about healthcare in this country. In charge of the federal government program, he was campaigning to privatize and planning to personally profit from if and when that happened.
on the heels of Donald Trump picking him to run Medicare and Medicaid in this country. We also got news on other health care picks to run the CDC, Donald Trump picked a former Republican congressman who for years has crusaded on the false claim that vaccines must be the cause of autism to lead the National Institute of Health. Trump's top candidate endorsed herd immunity.
as the best way to address the COVID pandemic. Just a fancy way of saying, let's get everybody sick and see what happens. Call the weak. Call the elderly. Then there's Trump's pick for Surgeon General, the nation's top doctor. She is a TV personality herself. She went to a for-profit medical school in the Caribbean. She has no public health experience whatsoever, but she does appear regularly on the Fox.
That's nothing to say of the guy who is the leading anti-vaccine crank and quack in the United States, who is considered to be responsible for a totally preventable, is considered to be largely responsible for a totally preventable healthcare crisis that actually took dozens of lives in this country. And that story's next.
This is the biggest increase in deaths we've seen since records began. The figure of 32 debt is up from 25 only yesterday. Any source was not designed to deal with this and I think the minute you're getting hospitals running at 200% capacity, I think that speaks for itself. It's incredibly serious.
That was an Australian news station reporting from the island nation of Samoa in 2019. And if it seems familiar, it may look and sound like the kind of news reports we saw from all over the world in 2020 during the global COVID pandemic.
But this was not about COVID, and this all happened before COVID. This was 2019, this outbreak in Samoa. It killed more than 80 people, many of them young kids. The government had to order lockdowns to try to save people's lives. Charities from around the world had to ship children's coffins to Samoa to deal with a shortage of coffins there for all the little kids and babies who were dying. What Samoa was experiencing in 2019 was an epidemic of measles.
a preventable epidemic. And I say that because measles is a disease for which there has been an effective vaccine available for more than 60 years.
That entirely preventable disease outbreak in Samoa in 2019 is now newly relevant because one of the factors that contributed to that outbreak was a sudden onset of hostility to vaccination on the island. And that hostility was stoked in large part by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who Donald Trump has just tapped to lead the Department of Health and Human Services. Kennedy's anti-vaccine organization, Children's Health Defense,
very aggressively spread anti-vaccine propaganda, not only in the United States, but around the world. And in Samoa, they claimed that the measles vaccine itself was the cause of the outbreak and not the solution to it. RFK Jr. personally lobbied the governor of Samoa, telling the governor that vaccination was what caused the spread of measles, not what needed to be done to stop the spread of it.
And that's insane.
As journalist Brian Deere writes in a new op-ed for the New York Times today, quote, I was in Samoa during that outbreak as part of my more than 16 years of reporting on the anti-vaccine movement. The cause of the outbreak was not the vaccine, but most likely an infected traveler who brought the virus from New Zealand, which that year had the biggest measles outbreaks in decades, especially among that country's indigenous and Pacific Islander communities. Migration and poverty were likely factors in a sudden spread of measles in Samoa and in New Zealand.
But as an editorial in the New Zealand Medical Journal reported, so too was a factor that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. specializes in, quote, increasing circulation of misinformation leading to distrust and reduced vaccination uptake. Joining us now is Brian Deere. He's a journalist and the author of the book, The Doctor Who Fooled the World about the anti-vaccine movement. Mr. Deere, I really appreciate you taking time to join us today. Thank you. Pleasure, Rachel. Nice to be here.
I think that since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. associated himself both with this presidential election, first as an independent candidate, and then secondly with Donald Trump, now especially since he's been put forward for this very powerful health post, I think Americans have started to hear about his very troubling role in this deadly outbreak in Samoa. But I still think the concept of it, the idea of it is fuzzy to a lot of people.
Can you describe to us the nature of the outbreak, how severe it was, and why he's associated with it and thought to be potentially partially responsible for the death toll? Well, the plot thickens from what you were saying a moment ago in that
It's almost certain that the virus got into Samoa by flight from Auckland. And just a little while before that, Friends of Kennedy had been in Auckland, in New Zealand, with a film which had been promoted in the United States by Robert De Niro and got a lot of attention in the United States, which was suggesting that there was fraud at the CDC in Atlanta.
there actually wasn't. So they'd been touring in Auckland, South Auckland, where a lot of Pacific Islander communities there, which became very, very susceptible, it was there that that year New Zealand saw the biggest outbreak of measles in decades.
So it was no surprise really that that virus did get on to an aircraft and got its way out to Samoa. Mr Kennedy really has questions to answer about his relationship with the people who made that film. It was called Vaxd and Mr Kennedy became the executive producer of SQL Vaxd II and was a close colleague of the people who went out to New Zealand and also to Australia to promote
fear of vaccines. So that's where it came from and the catastrophic consequences that I witnessed on the island. I spent much of a week of the time I was there just simply talking to mothers about the loss of their children.
and it was really awful to listen to them and I found myself at the end of it all just sitting in a cathedral and crying and crying. I couldn't stop crying as the accumulation of pain from these mothers really consumed me. It was awful.
Why would somebody like RFK Jr. have influence in a place like Samoa as to whether or not people vaccinated their kids? Why would his influence in particular be something that sort of perniciously accelerated the risk there?
Well, his name opens doors. He's always known that. I mean, he's really not a lot more than his name is he. He's not a particularly good lawyer. He pays himself the last time I looked $500,000, half a million dollars a year to run children's health defense, which he'd set up himself. But he's not a particularly distinguished man in his own right.
But he got out to Samoa. He went to visit them. He went to see the Prime Minister. And as you say, tried to convince the Prime Minister that it was, in fact, the vaccine that was causing the deaths and not the measles virus, extraordinary thing to do. But, you know, he's been making this kind of mischief for many years now.
journalist and author Brian Deere, the author of The Doctor Who Fooled The World. Mr. Deere, I appreciate you being with us for this. And I'd love to have you back to talk with you more about this in the future, if you don't mind. Great. Thank you very much for your time tonight. We'll be right back.
So about 10 days ago, New York Times published a profile of an advisor to President-elect Donald Trump, a guy by the name of Boris Epstein. The title did, quote, the Trump lawyer who wields outsize influence.
on the next White House. Quote, there's nobody in the president-elect's orbit who at this point would doubt the level of Mr. Epstein's influence. He has quickly become one of the most powerful figures in the early days of the presidential transition. He's become a significant gatekeeper for Trump, including shaping some of the information he receives about personnel and cabinet selections.
Epstein was reportedly pivotal in securing the ultimately doomed nomination of Matt Gaetz to be Attorney General of the United States, also the nomination of Trump's chosen White House counsel. Now, we've been through one Trump transition and one Trump administration before. So what comes next is as obvious to you as it is to me, right? In the snake pit of jockeying egos that Trump cultivates around himself,
You know, if this guy Boris is seen as ascendant right now in terms of his influence, then of course all of the other snakes are activated! All the other people in Trump's orbit will soon come for Boris, right? It's inevitable. It's like the sun rising in the east. Somebody's important? Not for long!
Q today's headline, CNN first to report on allegations flying inside the Trump transition that old Boris has been trying to cash in on his proximity to Trump. Imagine what's described as quote, an internal investigation by Trump lawyers reportedly found that Boris Epstein asked potential Trump cabinet nominees to pay him.
for his help getting them nominated to pay him as much as $100,000 per month. Among the people, Epstein supposedly tried to shake down was Trump's ultimate nominee for Treasury, Scott Besant, who at least according to this internal Trump, quote, legal review, reportedly did not cough up the cash. He reportedly did not pay Boris Epstein before being selected for the job.
There's even a report published in a super Trump-friendly right-wing outlet that beset possibly in consultation with Vice President-elect J.D. Vance's office. He participated in kind of a amateur sting operation against Boris Epstein in which he tried to get Epstein on tape, asking him for money in exchange for the nomination.
I should say MSNBC and NBC News have not confirmed any of this reporting. Boris Epstein, however, tells us quote,
But of course it was going to be like this, right? Of course, the Trump transition and presumably the next Trump term will be a cornucopia of infighting and backbiting and Trump's allies all trying to sabotage each other, not only in the press, but any other underhanded way they can.
Of course it was going to be like this. More seriously though, these allegations that Boris was collecting cash or trying to collect cash in exchange for getting people put in the cabinet, it raises the prospect that Trump cabinet offices are for sale, right? The possibility that people would think there is a possibility of buying one because there at least has now been a published price for what it takes to get one.
The internal review by Trump lawyers supposedly found that Epstein didn't get money from anyone, that he wasn't able to collect his price for getting anybody installed in the cabinet, that jibes with what we heard as well. But we have asked if we can see this supposed review. I think they'll ever make it public. I think they'll ever give it to us. Watch this space.
We have a best new thing in the world today. Her name is Flynn Mary Donovan. She has just arrived in the lives of our dear colleagues, senior producer Jen Mulraney Donovan, and her big wonderful family. Look at her! Flynn Mary, you are perfect, not just because your mom says so. You are plain perfection in your little hospital hat. Flynn Mary Donovan, welcome to the world. Best new thing in the world today. God bless you.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
Maddow: Disgrace of Trump nepotism, abuse of pardons far surpasses Biden's pardon of his son
The Rachel Maddow Show
Rachel Maddow looks at the shocking level of nepotism in the early staffing of Donald Trump's second administration, leaving him without grounds to criticize President Biden's pardon of his son, Hunter, to spare him further political prosecution by Trump's supporters.
December 03, 2024
Free bonus podcast: Rachel Maddow guests on The World with Richard Engel and Yalda Hakim
The Rachel Maddow Show
Rachel Maddow expects possible internment camps, assassinations, and political imprisonments during Trump's next term, while providing updates on Ukraine and Middle East conflict (Richard and Yalda recently returned from the region).
November 21, 2024
Maddow: Senate Democrats have chance to expose Trump nominees in waning days of control
The Rachel Maddow Show
Democrats are using their power to hindr Trump from garnering unrestricted power.
November 19, 2024
Podcast extra: Rachel Maddow talks with Nicolle Wallace about Trump's early Cabinet picks
The Rachel Maddow Show
Rachel Maddow discusses Donald Trump's cabinet picks for his second administration and their role in his authoritarian project, offering advice for Americans concerned about democracy.
November 18, 2024
Ask this episodeAI Anything
Hi! You're chatting with The Rachel Maddow Show AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history