Wondery Plus subscribers can listen to how I built this early and ad-free right now. Join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple Podcasts. Once again, we find ourselves in an unprecedented election. And with all that's happening in the lead up to the big day, a weekly podcast just won't cut it. Get a better grasp of where we stand as a nation every weekday on the NPR Politics Podcast.
Here are seasoned reporters dig into the issues that are shaping voters' decisions and understand how the latest updates play into the bigger picture. The NPR Politics podcast, listen on Spotify.
bold and innovative solutions to big problems that we face as a society. These founders are trying to address issues like unequal access to health care, pollution, food safety, and of course, climate change. And again, on the show today, I'm talking to someone working on a big problem, but it's one that we haven't discussed before. In the United States in 2021, according to the CDC,
Almost 49,000 people died from gun-related injuries. And in 2020, guns surpassed car accidents as the leading cause of death among children and teens. Now, no one thinks this epidemic of gun violence is a good thing, but meaningful ways to reduce gun violence have been really difficult to achieve. Gun policy is a third-rail issue in American politics and society.
And there are plenty of reasons which we won't go into today why many people feel like making progress in this area is almost impossible. But Kai Klopfer doesn't think so. His startup BioFire is focused on developing a smart gun, a firearm, that's impossible to use if it's not unlocked by the owner's biometrics. And by the way, this idea isn't new. Companies have tried versions of it before and totally failed.
And Kai thinks that's largely because the technology wasn't good enough or didn't exist. Now Kai's goal for the BioFire smart gun isn't to eliminate gun violence, but he does think that it might reduce accidental gun injuries and deaths, as well as gun suicides among adolescents.
Kai grew up in Boulder, Colorado, and he loved tinkering, science, and engineering. And he started thinking a lot about guns when he was 15, after the mass shooting at a movie theater in the nearby town of Aurora. Before that, his exposure to firearms was pretty minimal.
I have a bunch of family in Tennessee that got the chance to go ski shooting and stuff growing up and experience more of the fun side of firearms. But that was sort of my first encounter where I was 15th time so old enough to actually start to think about, hey, there are some other impacts to what firearm ownership looks like in society. And there are impacts that nobody is looking for.
And you were basically a kid who, I mean, you were like winning science competitions and you were a tinkerer. And when that happened in Aurora, you're thinking was, wow, is there something that can be done to prevent this essentially? And what was your initial thought? Like what, what are you thinking? Maybe we could do what? The first step I think of any process and project is to dig into, okay, what's the actual problem? Yeah.
I very quickly realized, you know, while mass shootings and other kind of violent crime like that, obviously something that we hear about a lot in the news, they actually make up a very small percentage of gun deaths where two thirds of gun deaths in the United States are the result of suicides and accidents. And that seemed like to me an area that would
Better lend itself towards the kind of technical solution that I was interested in working on, because it's something where I might be able to work with gun owners to provide better products, better tools, as opposed to the more adversarial relationship of trying to prevent a criminal from committing a crime.
preventing the aurora shooting would you know was probably as long as guns are legal probably almost impossible because i think that gun that that shooter acquired the guns legally in many cases uh... you know most cases they do but having looked at the data you saw that you know for example last year or most recent year twenty one about forty eight thousand gun deaths in the u.s. and about
close to 60% of those were suicides, you thought, well, maybe there's another way to have an impact. Maybe we can prevent things like suicide or accidental deaths from gunfire.
Yeah, exactly. I started to think about very much especially focused on children and teenagers. Those are situations where somebody, the kid or teenager, is getting access to a firearm that the owner does not intend for them to have access to. It's unfortunately pretty clear cut with children and teenagers where they're not legally allowed to own firearms. That's almost always a parent's firearm or a relative's firearm or something else.
And so the obvious solution is, okay, well, how do we ensure that kids don't get access to firearms? And this is not a novel question, right? You know, US all sorts of rules and regulations around gun safety and storage and secure like here in Colorado, you're required to secure your firearms, you know, from unauthorized access. That's true in many states as well. But those don't seem to be particularly effective or at least not effective enough to really fully address the challenge. And I think the reason why that is is it really just boils down to humans make mistakes. And so.
That really lends itself towards, you know, well, how do you prevent mistakes? Okay. Can we provide pieces of technology that start to remove some of the aspects of human error from at least portions of the equation of gun safety? So you're essentially the idea that you decided to tackle was can we build a gun?
that is only accessible, can only be used by a person it recognizes. Exactly. A firearm that's always locked by default, only ever unlocks when you pick it up and are holding onto it, and then instantly relocks, most importantly, instantly relocks as soon as it leaves your control. And it's really that last part, because that's what prevents your kid, your teenager, or anybody else from getting access to it, because it's always locked no matter what you do. There's no manual action required to lock it.
Initially, we're going back to 2012. How did you start to do that as a 15-year-old? What tools did you use to build a prototype? I would say, in a lot of ways, just like any other engineering problem, you define your problem statement, you define your hypothesis, then you start breaking it down to pieces. I ended up actually long story short, winning first place in engineering at the Intel International Science Fair that year, which is the top of that competition.
But they have all sorts of the science technology decided that puts on these competitions. That's all sorts of rules and regulations. And, you know, one of them obviously is, you know, can't work on weapons. It's also would have been illegal for me to have possession of a fire over the time. And so what I did was I actually went and bought a starter pistol, something that's not considered to be a firearm. I took it apart and started to look at it. Like, how does it work internally? How does it work? And then basically designed my own version of this prototype that
Lots of 3D printed plastics and metal, lots of circuit boards, things like that, with this little actuator that basically locked and unlocked the system based on the input of whether or not your fingerprint matched. Went through over the course of that project, a couple of hundred different generations in iterations, and lots of 3D printing, lots of iteration to get to the point where it was good enough to win that final competition. But this was not a gun that fired. You just demonstrated that a fingerprint could unlock it.
Absolutely. In fact, it was designed to be deliberately not a gun and something that didn't look too much like a gun. It was like gun-esque, but they wouldn't let me bring something that looked like a firearm into the science fair. It was very much designed to demonstrate how you would integrate with a firearm in concept. I actually later ended up going on and applying that technology to an actual firearm as a prototype.
a year or two later. You want a grant in 2014, a $50,000 grant. I mean, you were still in high school in Colorado and really started to pursue this. I mean, with $50,000, I guess you could buy a 3D printer maybe. So what was your plan? What did you do next?
Yeah, basically, I ended up receiving that $50,000 grant from a group called the Smart Tech Challenges Foundation, where basically a group of folks in Silicon Valley came together to say, hey, we should be investing into innovation and technology. There's no real investable companies in this space. Let's try to basically kind of like kickstart some right to foster some innovation in this space.
I had just turned 18 by this point as well, which is quite convenient, because I was able to ask my parents to buy a handgun for me and transfer it to me legally and use that as a platform. I basically ended up building a Glock 22, which is a full-sized handgun-based proof-of-concept prototype that had
all this technology built into it. It was fingerprint only. It was a better version, a newer version of the fingerprint because by that point, there was starting to be more, a lot more commercial investment into fingerprint technology. Lots of improvements across the board, but it was still based around kind of this fundamental concept of using an electromechanical actuator to inhibit the functionality of the gun, right? What I mean by that is you take a normal mechanical gun and then you electromechantically prevent it from working in some way, right? You disconnect a piece of it, you put a linkage, a pin in some linkage, something like that.
And that architecture is something that we later end up moving away from because it's not particularly reliable, but at the time was the only viable approach. You started at MIT as a student, but eventually you dropped out because this really became your focus of trying to create a gun that was safer. Let's just step back for a moment and talk about
this category, right? Because this technology to create something like that goes back to the 19th century, obviously not super sophisticated, but there were always ideas and designs on how to make guns safer, right?
And, you know, there even been attempts to create and have some have been successful to create technology that prevents unauthorized users from using guns, but it really has never taken off. I mean, I remember back in the 90s in the Clinton administration, they were talking about, you know, smart locks for guns or sensors on triggers and
And there was even a point, I think, where Smith & Wesson in the 90s was talking about maybe developing it, and it almost destroyed the company. I think the NRA was at the time was like, if you guys do this, we're going to tell all of our members not to buy Smith & Wesson. And I think it forced the CEO at the time to step down. So are those and other reasons? What are the reasons why, in your view,
Smart guns have never taken off. It's a good question. A couple different factors here. So as you point out, the concept of a smart gun is by no means a new one, right? James Bond has one, Judge Jed has one. It's been a popular science fiction topic for many years. It's something that there have been a previous attempts at building
by both startups as well as incumbents like Smith and Wesson, nobody prior to BioFire has ever sold a commercial smart gun. And what I mean by that, and this is true for every previous attempt at a smart gun, nobody has ever actually sold the fundamental technical challenges required to make something that anybody would want to buy. And that includes me. I'm a gun under myself. I own a lot of firearms at this point. And I would certainly not purchase any of the previous smart gun attempts. And you'll hear this. Because they weren't reliable. They weren't reliable. I couldn't trust them. If you needed it at the time of a crisis,
You couldn't trust it would work. Absolutely, right? And the product that we are building, it's not designed to be a toy, right? It's not designed to be a fun thing. You take the range and hopefully it works. Like the reason why you'd buy a BioFire smart gun or an e-smart gun is because, you know, that's the firearm that you want to have quick access to for home defense. And you're going to, one, trust that the technology is truly going to prevent your kid from using it if they should find it. And two, you are going to trust that the firearm is actually going to be usable in the unlikely event that you need to actually use in an emergency.
and if either one of those things is not true, it's not a good product and it's not one that you want to invest in. In fact, it's probably much worse than just buying a traditional firearm and putting it in a gun safe. Your sense is the reason why these haven't taken off is entirely because the technology wasn't good enough. There's obviously other reasons which is a very powerful
gun lobbies and organizations opposed them have been concerned that it's a slippery slope that the minute somebody makes one, they fear that lawmakers will try and make every gun a smart gun. Yeah, two answers on that. One, the NRA, as an example, does not oppose the development of smart guns, right? That's a public stance. You can go read on their website. And when they have pushed back on smart guns in the past, they were pushing back on situations where a basically non-functional firearm would have been mandated for an entire state.
But biofires approach here is really important. We've had lots of conversations with regulators, both at state levels and federal levels, to make it very clear that this has to be a choice. Yeah. We are building a product that we think is the best product you can buy for home defense, right, for a certain kind of home defense use case. But there's lots of situations where that firearm is not going to be the right choice. I'm curious what, I mean, probably many of those people are motivated to buy a handgun for self protection. Absolutely.
But there's really conflicting data around this. I've spent time looking at it, and I'm sure you've seen the same data from the CDC and other places, that show wild divergence in how often guns are used to prevent in self-defense situations.
anything from 15,000 times a year to 2 million times a year. The overwhelming evidence shows that most people who actually use a handgun in a self-defense situation, the benefits are outweighed by the risk. So what's your take on it? I mean, do you believe that there are significant examples every year in which people are using handguns to defend themselves and protect their lives and had they not had them, they wouldn't be alive?
My short answer is, yes, I do think there are real environments on a regular basis where people are using firearms as either as a deterrent or as an actual way to prevent threats to their personal health safety and their family's health and safety. Do I think that is anywhere near as common as most people think it is? Absolutely not. I think it's a very unlikely event. But at the same time,
I think that kind of even independent of that, people are going to continue to buy firearms or home defense, right? And that is something that I is only increasing rapidly year over year. In fact, it is rapidly becoming the primary reason why people buy firearms. And sure, some of this is, you know, COVID and other sort of, you know, major political and cultural things that have happened, you know, in the United States over the past couple of years. But also, there's just a lot of reasons why people, you know, see that as a natural way to protect themselves and their family.
We're gonna take a quick break, but when we come back, more on the risks and opportunities of smart gun technology like biofires. Stay with us, I'm Guy Raz, and you're listening to How I Built This Lab. Hey, it's Guy Raz here. You're about to hear from Gog and Biani, entrepreneur and mercury customer, to learn a little more about why mercury is the best banking partner for your startup journey.
I chose Mercury because I feel like as an entrepreneur, my goal is to try to build a product in a company. And most banks require me to understand a little bit more about how they operate, how they work, and what I need to do to interface with them. Whereas Mercury is the opposite. I don't have to think about anything. I can just log in, send a wire, check my balance, and move on with my life.
Join Goggin Biani, co-founder and CEO of Maven, and more than 100,000 entrepreneurs like him who choose Mercury for banking, credit cards, and the resources to turn their startups into success stories. Visit mercury.com to learn more. Mercury is a financial technology company, not a bank. Banking services provided by Choice Financial Group and Evolve Bank and Trust members FDIC.
but we usually know famous people for kind of one big thing. But what if we took a fresh perspective? That is what famous in gravy is all about. We tell celebrity biographies from a different point of view. On each episode, we choose a famous figure who has died recently. Muhammad Ali, Gene Wilder, Betty White, Harry Tyler Moore, Olivia Newton John, Norm McDonald, New Armstrong. And we look for stories that tell us something we didn't see before.
We consider what a celebrity life story tells us about ourselves. And we're the only show that dares to answer the question, would you want that life? I'm Michael Osborne. And I'm Amit Kapoor. We host Famous and Gravy. Biographies from a different point of view. Follow Famous and Gravy on the Wondrey app or wherever you get your podcast. You can listen to new episodes of Famous and Gravy early and ad free right now by joining Wondrey Plus on the Wondrey app, Apple Podcasts, or Spotify.
At a time when we're debating where policing is going, we're going to tell you where the police came from. They wanted me to write about the New York City Police Department, but without using the words violence or corruption, which is effectively impossible. A story of how the largest and most influential police department in the country became one of the most violent and corrupt organizations in the world.
It doesn't matter if you're a self emancipated bot person or if you're free or they're just sending people back to the south, kidnapping them.
when officers with the power to fight the danger become the danger. I was terrified. I'm not going to talk to the police because they're the ones who are perpetuating this. Who am I going to talk to? From Wondery and Cricut Media, I'm Chen Jarakuminika. And this is Empire City, the untold origin story of the NYPD. Follow Empire City on The Wondery app for wherever you get your podcasts. You can binge all episodes of Empire City early and add free right now by joining Wondery Plus.
My name is Georgia King and I am thrilled to be the host of And Away We Go, a brand new travel podcast on Wondery Plus, where we'll be whisked away on immersive adventures all around the world. Where we go, what we do, what we eat, drink and listen to will all be up to my very special guests.
We've got Ben Schwartz taking us on a whirlwind trip around Disneyland. We'll eat a bowl of life-changing pasta with Jimio Yang in Tuscany, Italy. And how do you feel about a spot of sugaring off with Emily Hampshire in Montreal? And away we go, we'll immerse you in some of the wonders of the world. We're going to be seeing some yellows and vibrant oranges. And the shoes clicking against the cobblestone. If you're looking to get somebody in the mood, have them look at the Chicago skyline.
You can listen to and away we go exclusively with Wondery Plus. Join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple Podcasts. George, did you know what a joy sounds like? I think I'm hearing it right now. One more thing before we get back to the show, please make sure to click the follow button on your podcast app so you never miss a new episode of the show and it's totally free.
Welcome back to How I Built This Lab. I'm Guy Raz, and I'm talking with the founder of BioFire, Kai Clubford. He thinks that his company's smart gun technology will reduce gun-related accidents, and he's confident that there's a market for that. So guns people will own them, and that's not going to change. What you're saying is, we want to offer something that is a little safer, and it's not going to be for everybody.
It might not even be for the vast majority of gun owners, but there is going to be a sliver of people in the US who might be hesitating to buy a gun because they're worried about, you know, their kids getting old of it or something like that, but that might feel comfortable with this solution.
Absolutely. And I would say, I think that sliver is bigger than you think it is. And the reason for that is there's basically two kind of primary groups of people that buy firearms. There's what I would call gun enthusiasts. And this is what most people think of when they think of gun owners. Like, I'm a gun enthusiast. I own multiple guns. I care about guns. I follow the latest developments, et cetera, not just because professionally, but like personally, I think it's interesting.
That being said, over 50% of gun purchasers, not number of gun sold, but of gun purchasers, do not fit that category at all. It's not part of their community or their hobby or their sport, right? It's more in the category of going to Home Depot and buying a power drill.
And this entry level community, this group of folks that are thinking about buying a fire for the first time, that community is tend to be the folks that have the least experience with firearms. It tends to be the highest rate of accidents, the highest rate of mistakes, and they tend to be the most concerned about unauthorized access. All right, let's talk about the technology for a moment because a
Let's just say a basic handgun, like a Glock, is a very elegant piece of technology. And I hesitate to use that because I know that some people listening really don't like to hear about guns, but just sort of looking at it. I mean, it's a very, very unbelievably simple series of pieces that come together to produce this very powerful and deadly weapon.
What you guys have is tons of technology packed in. So for people who haven't seen the video of BioFire, explain how it works. It's a nine millimeter gun, your standard kind of...
handgun and it uses any nine millimeter ammunition, right? So basically, yeah, so the BioFire Smart Gun is a fully custom novel nine millimeter smart handgun designed from the ground up for this home defense use case. The way that it works is it's always locked by default, right? So anytime that the owner or some of the owners chosen is not interacting with the firearm, it's locked and unusable, which means unable to be fired, right? If you were to pick it up, put around the chamber, pull the trigger, the gun would not fire.
Again, we're very focused on home defense, right? So folks that might be buying a firearm to put their nightstand drawer to keep accessible in the home, something like that. So people who wanted available in the event, in the unlikely event, but their home is broken into.
They want to access it quickly, but if it was kept in a safe, you can't access it quickly. If it wasn't loaded, you can't access it quickly. But of course, that's the safest way to store it. Correct. That's actually one of the main reasons why we're focused on Home Defense. Not only is it a good market and there's a lot of people that have some unmet need here that we can address, but
There is this sort of inherent tension between in practice, again, if you're actually going to practically own a firearm from defense, the situation where you're going to use it is going to be the middle of the night, you just woke up, you're groggy, you have no idea what's going on, and you have probably literally seconds to access the firearm at most. And what that means is you have to make a decision of, do you optimize for the once in a million event of somebody breaking in, or do you optimize for the day-to-day event of your kid finding it?
And you can't really solve for both, right? There's no technical solution that allows you to solve for both. BioFire's product does. Our system is just inherently secure. When the owner or some of the owners chosen picks the firearm up, it automatically wakes up and recognizes their biometrics. There's two ways that you can do that. And you'll need one of them to work, right? You don't need both, you just need one.
which is either a fingerprint sensor that's built into the grip underneath your middle finger of your dominant hand, or a 3D facial recognition system that sits on the back, similar to like an Apple Face ID. So there's a camera in the gun, actually. Yeah, a little camera and a full sort of 3D infrared structure light solution as well.
But once either one of those recognizes, again, the owner or some of the, the owner has chosen to enroll into firearm, the gun unlocks. It then stays unlocked the entire time you're holding onto it. Anytime it's unlocked, it functions basically like a normal firearm. If it's around the chamber and you pull a trigger, the gun fires. We can talk about this later. Under the hood, we've totally reinvented the entire operating concept of how the gun works. It's fire by wire. It's very, very novel, but none of that is visible to the customer. You just pick it up and you pull a trigger. So unlike a,
a standard handgun, there are electronics in it as a battery. Yep, as a battery. It has a bunch of circuit boards, software processing, and that's how we run the biometrics, electronic fire control. There's lots of internal basically monitoring systems that help ensure reliability. All of those are basically designed to improve the reliability and user experience in the system. I wonder, you know, there are going to be people who are listening to this, who are gun owners or gun enthusiasts. And of course, you know where their head is going to go to, which is
Wait a minute, all of this data, this biometric data, you have this. You know my face, you know my thumbprint, which means you can control my weapon too. I believe that all of the biometric data is just kept locally on the gun.
How do you guarantee or how do you assure people that it's not kept in a central database that, you know, that biofire controls? It's a great question. And yes, you're definitely correct. That's, that's a key concern of our customers. And one that I think is, is a reasonable concern. Uh, the short answer is we do not have any of that data. We have no ability to access it. We have never had any ability to access it. We do not process it. We do not handle it.
There's no Wi-Fi capability. It doesn't connect to the internet. So the way that we do that is the gun itself is totally air gap. There's no Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, GPS, IoT, RF communications, VinnieKIND, and all of the biometric data, all the usage data, maintenance information, every single piece of information that the firearm
has to collect to be able to perform the function that we're advertising is stored encrypted locally within the firearm. And those encryption keys are generated by the device itself during manufacturing and a secure element. BioFire has never seen the keys. We never process them or handle them in any way. And basically, once the owner sets that firearm up, BioFire has no ability to factory reset it or assist the owner really in detail with what's going on in any way.
So basically, if the gun owner, if it only recognizes the owner, because I think you can add people to it, right? Yes. But if it just recognizes the owner and the owner just dies, that gun is obsolete. Correct. Yeah. And we're looking at ways that may long-term allow people to opt into like a kind of password recovery flow or something like that.
that still would not involve any servers, but would generate like a backup code or something. But as of right now, the only method that we found that we're comfortable releasing is it is locked to the owner's biometrics. And don't run, the owner has full control, right? So if they want to factory reset that and sell it to somebody else, they can do so. But if there was something unexpected that happened, yes, that firearm would be would be unusable.
How long do you think it'll take people to get comfortable with the idea that it's reliable? Like my iPhone is pretty reliable, right? I mean, it recognizes my face and it's, yeah, I can't remember a time where I didn't. But guns different, right? Especially people are thinking about personal safety. I mean, how do you think you're going to be able to kind of get to a tipping point where skeptics who are going to be like, there's no way I'm putting my life in the hands of a facial recognition system.
How do you think you can kind of create a tipping point where they're going to be like, huh, OK, I trust this. First step is you have to make it reliable. And I know I said that before, but I think it all really, I am an engineer and it does really come back to you. This is not a space or an industry or a product where we could go do some really amazing job on the marketing perspective and sell people kind of an OK product, right? You have to start off with a really great product and then you still have the challenge of how do you actually build that trust with your customers.
It's really hands-on experiences, right? And what that means is we want to have as many smart guns available after our customers. Our customers tend to show them to their friends and to other people that also includes getting it in the hands of trusted experts and reviewers on YouTube and podcasts and things like that. And additionally, I would say we have a lot more orders than we can fulfill. We have a ton of demand and our focus right now is fulfilling that demand. And I think as more and more of those get out in the wild, it'll also mean more and more opportunities for people to have hands-on experiences and to build that trust with our customers.
Do you think that down the road you're going to need the gun enthusiasts to buy your product? I keep thinking of Rivians. We had RJ Scoringe on the show a couple months ago, and he's a brilliant founder. He understood that trucks are the number one, two, and three best-selling vehicles in the United States, and to really make a dent on
Trying to clean up the environment. You got to get to make electric trucks But Rivians are still purchased mainly by people in the coasts and people who are kind of snowboarders skiers, you know People in urban settings. It's still it's iPhone users right technology people
And I would imagine at least for now, your product is going to appeal to those people too. But down the road, do you feel like you need the hunters and people in rural areas? And do you need those customers too to make this a successful product?
I think yes, not necessarily because of the number of people there, but because anybody who's thinking about buying a firearm, whether they're super experienced or especially if they're not super experienced, is going to go ask people that they know about whether or not this is a good product. And this is a big part of how we think about this. I don't, again,
I'm not expecting that every gun enthusiast or every person who owns a firearm in the United States is going to buy a smart gun. Because a lot of them don't see the use case. They don't see the value. It's not the right fit for them. It's too expensive. That's great. And whatever their decision is, that's why that choice aspect really matters. What I do want every gun expert enthusiast to say is, yeah, that's a high quality firearm. I would trust that. I don't think I personally need one, but I would trust that. And that's why we've invested just as much time, energy, and capital.
into building a really good gun as we have into building a smart gun. We're going to take a quick break, but when we come back, Kai's vision for the future of his company and maybe even the gun industry. Stay with us. I'm Guy Raz and you're listening to How I Built This Lab.
I'm Molly Bloom, and my podcast, Torched, tells some of the greatest stories of scandal and redemption on the world's biggest stage, the Olympics. It's no exaggeration to say at the Olympics, everything is on the line.
Metal's career money reputation, and with so much at stake, it's no wonder sometimes things can go awry. If you've seen the movie Molly's game, then you know that I left my Olympic dreams behind to run some of the biggest poker games in the world.
Now I traded in my chips for a pen and a microphone. Untorched, we'll be digging into some of the most memorable Olympic moments, like Greg Louganes' infamous dive and Boris and Ashanko's attempt to cheat at fencing. You can listen to Torch to add free and enjoy exclusive content, only on Wondery Plus. Join Wondery Plus in the Wondery app. Apple Podcasts for Spotify.
Welcome back to How I Built This Lab. My guest today is the founder of BioFire. It's a company that makes fingerprint-enabled smart guns to try and curb firearm-related accidents and deaths. Sakai, you've been working on this technology really since you were a teenager. Now, you formally launched your company back in 2016, even while you were a student. And then you ended up dropping out of college in 2018 to focus on this full time.
And with several years of building this full-time under your belt, I wonder, I'd be curious to sort of get your prediction on this, and this is pure speculation, but is there a world in which, you know, let's say five or ten years from now, where the big gun manufacturers see what you're doing and say, you know, huh, there's an opportunity here, and then they start making smart guns?
Absolutely. Yeah, and I think in a lot of ways, BioFire's objective is we want everybody to be making smartphones, right? I think BioFire is never going to be, you know, not just from a Tesla or a Rivian, like we're never going to address the entire market and we have no plans to, right? We want to, you know, find good niches and build good products and be the best in the industry on that. But there's always going to be the need for competition and for other brands in the space. And so, you know, I think, hopefully, yes.
I think the starting price, the pre-order price is like $1,500 for the gun. It's like three times the price of just a Glock 19. Presumably over time, the price will go down. There's a lot of technology and there's got to be expensive, but it's kind of tough to compete with.
If you're looking to build a, you know, to attract a significant number of customers down the road, I'm assuming you're going to have to bring that price down, make it maybe competitive with a non-smart gun. Yes, definitely. Our project is positioned at a premium price point. I will say among folks that are.
in kind of our core customer demographics. The average basket price, right, if they, when they go buy a firearm, the amount of money that they spend on average is closer to $1,200 to $1,300 because they'll buy a biometric gun safe for a couple of hundred dollars. They'll buy some accessories, upgrades, things like that. Almost all of those features are directly built into our product. And so my initial argument would be it's more like we're competing with a $1,200 for $1,300 price point, which again, $1,500 is still a premium.
For the product that we're building right now, yes, definitely our objective, you know, we're a new company, we're scaling our manufacturing efforts. We definitely don't benefit from the economies of scale of the incumbents like Glock. And that's partially reflected in the pricing. And those will, you know, as we get more successful and ship more product, like that pricing will come down and allow us to further reduce the cost. But those are our little ways sent a line. I think you've raised about $30 million total. I know you have some very well-known backers Ron Conway and others.
But I wonder if you had issues trying to raise money because there's so much pushback, there's been so much pushback from special interest groups and even gun owners and it's never worked. So I have to imagine you face some skepticism from investors who are like, this is a niche market.
Yeah, I would say the easy answer is fundraising is always hard no matter what you're doing. That being said, yes, I think definitely, especially early on, fundraising for BioFire was probably more challenging than average. And I would actually mostly pin that on two main factors, neither of which is special interest groups or the NRA or anything like that. The two main factors is one, we're building hardware and two, we're building complicated deep tech hardware that is technically a weapon.
when I was fundraising initially, let's say eight years ago or so, those two factors alone basically opted out the vast majority of traditional venture investors. Either they would not invest in hardware, which was pretty common. There's lots of venture funds that only do software deals, or most venture funds would have as known as a LPA restriction. The agreement that they have with their investors would have a clause in it saying, you're not allowed to invest in invites, so weapons, pornography, drugs, et cetera. No matter
why we're doing this no matter that the whole point is to improve safety and save lives, oftentimes we would trigger those sort of clauses. I know the guns are starting to ship out in 2024. Early next year. Yep. Right. And how many have been ordered so far? Is that public?
I can't just close exact numbers, but thousands is like thousands. Okay. Cause I know you had, you had two models, you had a launch edition and then the second edition. So those will start to be sent out and presumably, I mean, you're manufacturing them. So what you can use now, what you've played around with and shot, it is totally reliable. You, you pick it up and if it recognizes you, it's like it's a millisecond. It's, it's a half a second. It's ready to go.
Yes. Basically, the goal is the system is unlocks faster than you can pick it up off a table. So in a fraction of a second, basically. And so part of the reason why there's this much complexity and technology built into it is, you know, we need to deliver very high quality biometrics faster than almost any other application that they're used in. And that's been, I can say, quite the engineering challenge for our software teams and electrical engineering teams to handle a lot of the complexity required with that. Additionally,
I mentioned earlier in the show how with that Glock prototype that we were working on a long time ago, it used an inhibitor. It basically took a mechanical system and used that to prevent the gun mechanically from working. It turns out that doesn't really work. The kind of actuators that you could put in there would add another second or so to the process after you had already finished processing all the biometrics and software data.
Biophire, we really went back to drawing board and pioneer the world's first ever electronic fire control system in a handgun. The trigger mechanically is not connected to the firing pin in any way. There still is a mechanical firing pin, because we want to have it support traditional 9mm ammunition, which needs a traditional firing pin. But the connection between the trigger and the firing pin were in normal gun,
would just be a mechanical linkage in our system is fully electronic. The trigger is really just a fancy switch that is an input to that solid state fire control system. One of the important parts about that, knowing is it dramatically more reliable because it's solid state electronics that don't wear out, you know, within any, you know, lifetime of the customer and never need any maintenance, but it also can be armed and disarmed in about five microseconds, not milliseconds, microseconds, which means like for all intents purposes, effectively it's a is.
I have to imagine it's going to take a while for you guys to reach profitability. This is to be a cash-intensive production. You are manufacturing. You're in a manufacturing business. You're not making software. I have to imagine the first run of
firearms, which you've sold, maybe the costs are higher to you than they are for the customer. At what point do you see a path to profitability? This is a multi-billion dollar industry. For better or worse, and I know, again, this is a controversial topic for some people, for many people, but in fact, the matter is a big industry. It's a big market in the U.S.
Yeah, so I would say, you asked previously why has nobody actually succeeded in building this technology prior to BioFire? And my answer was nobody actually actually ever built the technology, thus they couldn't build a product or company around it. I think one of them, not by any means the only reason, but one of the main reasons why nobody has succeeded prior to BioFire in building technology is nobody succeeded in having the kind of capital required to build the kind of engineering team required to do this. This is not something you can do with a cheap engineering team. Almost the entirety of that $30 million has been spent on R&D, right? On basically paying engineers to do engineering.
At the same time, the reason why we've been able to get access to that kind of capital is because we have an actual viable business model. I'm actually not sure that's ever existed in this space before. Our Series A, which we announced last year, that was the first ever venture led investment into a firearms company from Founders Fund. That was a big milestone. And part of that was we were able to share a strategy that allowed us to push towards profitability without insane amounts of digital capital.
So I can't share exact timelines, et cetera, of course, because it's always up to you to change. But a big part of this from the very beginning has been, we're not just doing R&D on a fictional product that we need to build one of. We're doing product development, really, on a product that is designed to be scaled into the hundreds of thousands or millions of units. Kai, looking ahead, where do you want to be in five years? Let's say 10 years from now. Do you want to be able to come back on the show and say, we've saved
X number of lives. Obviously, it's inevitable that somebody is going to use this in a situation at some point that's going to cause bad press. It's just a fact of the matter. It's going to happen. Somebody's going to use it and someone's going to die. But there might be examples of people who
where people could not commit suicide because they couldn't access this weapon. So in a perfect world, it's hard to make a gun a feel good story, but let's say, I imagine you'd rather that be the story than not. What do you want BioFire's story to be in five or 10 years?
I think the biggest thing for me is I want to prove out the technology, the product, and have it be available as a real option to a widespread of customers, and that includes being able to manufacture it at scale, that includes getting really good customer reviews, that includes serving other markets and use cases, then just the initial consumer one that we're talking about here.
And really having this be very obviously part of the conversation and not to overuse the Tesla analogy and I'm not claiming by far as Tesla or anything like that, but in a lot of ways prior to Tesla electric vehicles were dead. That's true. Right. And you could talk to any car manufacturer and they would tell you that electric vehicles were a dead end, not because they were probably impossible to build. You know, people built them, but because nobody wanted them.
Yeah. And so I think the big metric success for me is really being able to get this in the hand of as many customers that are interested in adopting technology as possible, and have them have a really good experience, right? And have that be a product that they can trust, that they can rely on, and that they're excited to tell their friends about. Kai Cluffer, thank you so much. Thanks for having me, Guy. That's Kai Cluffer, founder and CEO of BioFire.
Hey, thanks so much for listening to the show this week. Please make sure to click the follow button on your podcast app so you never miss an episode of the show, and it's totally free. This episode was produced by Casey Herman with editing by John Isabella and research by Alex Chung. Our music was composed by Ramteen Arablui. Our audio engineer was Neil Roush.
Our production team at How I Built This also includes JC Howard, Kerry Thompson, Elaine Coates, Carla Estvez, Chris Messini, Sam Paulson, and Ramel Wood. Niva Grant is our supervising editor. I'm Guy Raz and you've been listening to How I Built This Lab.
If you like how I built this, you can listen early and add free right now by joining Wondery Plus in the Wondery app or on Apple Podcasts. Prime members can listen ad-free on Amazon Music. Before you go, tell us about yourself by filling out a short survey at Wondery.com slash survey.
