846: This Is the Cake We Baked
en
November 10, 2024
TLDR: Discussion on reactions to Trump's election victory, examining the potential impacts on Latino voters and deportation policies, conversations with Trump 'enemies', and abortion rights measures.
Episode Title: 846: This Is the Cake We Baked
Episode Release: This episode covers the aftermath of Donald Trump's recent election victory, exploring diverse perspectives on the election's implications and future outcomes.
Overview
The latest episode of "This American Life" dives deep into the reactions and analyses stemming from Donald Trump's electoral win, highlighting contrasting reflections from supporters, opponents, and electoral observers. As the country recalibrated its understanding of its political landscape, the episode explored the motivations behind key voter demographics, particularly the surge in Latino support for Trump, and the potential impacts of proposed mass deportation policies and key election measures.
Key Themes:
- Election Night Reactions
- Mass Deportation Speculation
- Latino Voter Dynamics
- Future Political Repercussions
Election Night Reactions
Hope and Disappointment
- The episode opens with host Ira Glass and producer Zoe Chace reflecting on the jubilant atmosphere at the Republican victory party in Michigan, contrasting it with moments of despair voiced by those hurt by Trump's previous term, especially in the wake of the Capitol insurrection on January 6.
- A police officer discusses his lingering confusion and sadness over the electoral outcome, struggling to understand how many could support Trump despite his controversial actions.
Key Takeaway:
- The country remains deeply divided, with emotions ranging from ecstasy to devastation, based on the election results.
Mass Deportation Speculation
Understanding Proposed Deportations
- Producer Nadia Reiman investigates the logistics behind Trump's promises of mass deportations, delving into how a new administration might operationalize such an ambitious claim.
- Insights from former ICE officials reveal the potential for rapid deportations, starting with certain immigrant groups and utilizing existing community law enforcement relationships.
Key Concepts:
- Community Impact: Expected community-level effects include visible ICE raids in neighborhoods and significant disruption in local economies due to a shortage of workforce.
- Political Ramifications: Mass deportations could lead to economic repercussions, including inflation and increased unrest within immigrant communities.
Latino Voter Dynamics
Record Latino Support
- Host Ira Glass interviews Sam Negron, a key figure in mobilizing Latino voters for Trump, who reflects on his experiences canvassing within the Latino community in Pennsylvania.
- Statistics reveal Trump garnered unprecedented support from Latino voters, attributed to community concerns over issues such as crime, drug addiction, and dissatisfaction with the Democratic party's handling of immigration reform.
Takeaways:
- Community Outreach Strategies: Curating conversations within culturally relevant contexts was vital for shifting perceptions and garnering support in historically Democratic regions.
- Understanding Discontent: Many Latino voters expressed frustration over perceived neglect by the Democratic party, leading them to re-evaluate their political choices.
Future Political Repercussions
Responses from Trump's Political Foes
- The episode also discusses how political enemies of Trump are strategizing in the wake of the election, examining personal investments in political outcomes and the tangible sense of threat from potential reprisals or politically motivated actions from the Trump administration.
- Alex and Rachel Vinman, who have previously stood against Trump’s policies, remain uncertain about their future amidst widespread retaliation talk.
Key Insight:
- Political Survival: Individuals previously targeted by Trump’s rhetoric are contemplating their safety and strategies for resilience, reflecting on the fraught political atmosphere and increasing polarization in American politics.
Conclusion
This episode of "This American Life" encapsulates a pivotal moment in American politics post-election, revealing a complex tapestry of emotions, insights, and predictions about what lies ahead for the nation under the steady hand of policies from a re-elected Trump. From understanding community dynamics to the looming specter of mass deportations, the podcast seeks to unravel the multifaceted implications of a divided electoral outcome and its aftermath.
Final Thoughts
Listeners are encouraged to reflect on the varied experiences and narratives shared in this episode, contemplating how these discussions resonate within their communities as they navigate the shifting landscape of America's political future.
Was this summary helpful?
A quick warning, there are curse words that are unbeeped in today's episode of the show. If you prefer a beeped version, you can find that at our website, thisamericanlife.org. So this week, lots of people go through the election results and thought, yeah, this is the country that I thought it was. And for some people, that was a really hopeful thing. And others, kind of the opposite.
And let's start with the winners. I'm joined in the studio right now by Zoe Chase. Hello. Hey, there's Zoe. So election night, you and I were in Michigan together and you got to go to the Republican victory party. I did. Let's bring in the sound. There it is. As I walk in, the polls were closing. The results were starting to come in. I have to say, I walked in kind of prepared for the last war, like the last election. Explain what you mean.
Well, I know a lot of these Republicans in Michigan. I know they've been mobilizing for years an army of poll watchers and poll challengers and lawyers to challenge the results of a fraudulent election. So I come in expecting super tight results and a long fight and tension and anxiety and suspicion. And that is not what I found. What are people cheering for? We're up in Pennsylvania. We're just tied in Michigan.
look at that my heart's gonna pop out of my chest feels like it
It's Eric Castiglia, longtime Republican activist. He runs a pack called Brighter Michigan. He believes the last election was rife with fraud, not this one. In fact, there was never a moment once the count started where anyone in this room wasn't believing the results. Well, yeah, because it was all breaking their way. I know, but also these are the people on the ground who ran the ground game in Michigan, and they were feeling really good about what they did. All right, Eric.
going to happen. I think he's going to win, baby. He's going to win. I'm so happy. I am so happy. You have no idea. So it was obvious that they were going to win way before it was obvious to you. Yes, very much. Like when I was talking to Amber Harris, we first met last year. She's a Republican activist.
I didn't honestly expect the night to go this way in general. Oh, I did. Really? Yeah. We worked really hard for this. And I'm happy. I'm very happy. We worked really, really hard. We knocked a lot of doors. We went into territories that we never would have, whether it's Detroit, because we had nothing to lose. As a party, we have nothing to lose besides talking to people. And I think that this is a very
This is what came when you just talked to people. She's right that more people came out. The Republican vote in Michigan was unprecedented. Trump got more votes than he did last time he ran in Detroit, in the surrounding suburbs, in almost every county in the state of Michigan. Okay, so then at some point in the night, Trump wins. Yes, much earlier than I was expecting. Let's hear some sound of that.
John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John! John!
I think people truly missed that. I think they did this journey to go back to where we were. And I think people believed in them. That's true. Some people. And some did not. I believe I've heard that.
Somebody had checked with a couple of days after the election with Danny Hodges. He's watching the DC policeman, who was one of the officers, who defended the Capitol building back on January 6. He was beaten. Somebody tried to gouge out his eye. He was trapped by the crowd at one point, and the man took his nightstick and hid his head. In the wake of that, he's testifying in Congress, under the trials of a number of people who attacked the Capitol, including one last week. And when I talked to him, he said something that I heard from a bunch of Democrats.
It's like it wasn't just disappointment he was feeling, but a whole feeling that I can only describe is, whoa. Like many people, I'm sad and confused. Still wrapping my head around how so many people could vote for Trump after everything we know about him, everything he's done. I don't understand it. I don't get it.
Since January 6, you've spoken so much about what happened to you at the Capitol over four years. When you started on that path, what did you hope it would accomplish? The opposite of this, I hope that I would communicate to the people that what happened was real, that Trump sent an armored mob to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
I wanted people to understand this and in the hope that they would respect the rule of law and that they would have respect for the Constitution and choose their leaders with that in mind in the future. But I guess that wasn't at the top of everyone's priorities.
And what's I like to look at the possibility that President Trump might do what he said he would do and let all these people free from January 6th? It's hard to process. I don't know what to say about that, except that I have no influence over that. I just got a role with it, however it happens.
Today, after the billions of dollars spent in the countless hours of literally hundreds of thousands around the country, knocked themselves out for this election, canvassing, donating, poll watching, doing everything they knew how to do. Now, here we are. Still a divided country, staring at each other across an abyss, but with a queer winner.
And we thought what we could do here in our show is spend some time with a few of the people who felt very strongly about the outcome of this race, who have a special personal investment in it, looking ahead with them to what's next. From WB Easy Chicago to American Life, I'm Eric Goss. Stay with us.
It's his American life at one, or at times today, by the way, or quotes from the president elect, the largest deportation operation in American history. So mass deportations are coming. Donald Trump promised it. People waived mass deportation signs at his rallies. It was the first item when the Republican Party's platform this year.
at the Republican National Convention, Tom Holman, the guy who ran ICE under Trump, the Immigration and Customs Enforcement, had a message for undocumented immigrants, you better start packing now. President Trump has claimed he's going to be able to deport between 15 and 20 million people. His vice president, J.D. Vance, said the numbers lower, that they could do 1 million people per year. But Donald Trump and his team have never spelled out exactly how they would do this.
Our producer Nadi Raymond wondered about that and looked into what mass deportation could actually look like if and when it comes to pass.
I was kind of unfaced at first when I heard about Trump's mass deportation campaign promise. I've been covering immigration for years. There's so many undocumented people here that we can't even keep count. The closest estimate is 13.3 million. So it's a big job to round up all of these people and to send them back to countries that may not take them. It's expensive. It's time consuming. It's a crazy task.
But then I was talking to a source inside the Department of Homeland Security, and I said something like, I mean, I know there's no way Trump can do this mass deportation thing, and they stopped me. They were like, oh, sure it can happen. They said it so casually, like it was a given. So I wanted to talk to someone who could break down how, like exactly how could you do something so massive?
I tried talking to Tom Holman. He's rumored to be the next ICE director under Trump, but has denied there's a written plan for mass deportations. And he ghosted me. Jason Houser, however, was eager to talk. He was the chief of staff for ICE under Biden for a couple of years, has been working for DHS on and off since 9-11. Mostly in enforcement. He's passionate about all of this, in his wonky government guy way.
I talked to him for three and a half hours, asked him basically to play pretend, game some stuff out with me. What would happen in the first hundred days? If he was in charge of ICE, what could he do to carry out this mass deportation mandate? Jason thinks that, first of all, the new Trump administration will immediately start to prep for this, like the day after the election, this week.
They would start talking to law enforcement in different cities and getting them to agree to cooperate, hit the ground running in January. ICE would talk to home countries to get them to agree to take people back. And after those two things aligned, Jason says, ICE could decide to deport someone and they'd be out of the country within 24 hours. I think the first 90 days is going to be hell. You're going to see the buses.
You're going to see the migrants in your home, not just blue cities, red cities, Miami, Houston, Charlotte, like commute, like red states, Kansas City, St. Louis, right? You're going to see the, you're going to see kids not in your schools.
You're going to know where they're at because they're waiting in the detention cell and they have cell phones. You're going to see it in social media. You're going to see businesses not be able to open up because their workers didn't show up. You're going to see businesses being rated and it's going to become more intimate.
This isn't going to be about separating a family at the border that somebody doesn't know that family member. You're talking about separations and movements in your communities where you're going to know the guy. Bill, Juan, Louise, you're going to know the individuals. One of the things ICE would have to work around is which nationalities to deport first. You know, if you wanted to make the most impact.
A lot of countries don't take their own people back. Venezuela, for example, hardly accepts any immigrants back. Brazil only accepts two to four flights of immigrants a month. So who are the first people who would be deported, like in the first hundred days? Patience and Guatemalans. Patience and Guatemalans.
These countries take back the most flights. So I have a building to remove at volume individuals. A lot of them have entered through pathways that we've developed where we've gained biometric, we've gained vetting and we've seen that. Meaning we know where they are. Yeah, we know where they are, right? We know where they are.
the work in non-criminal. We go out, we find them. We're going to find nationalities that are easily removable and we're probably going to do it at volume with single adults first because removing families is more complex. You got to hold them, detain them, put them in hotels. It's very staff intensive. So I'm going to target down on single adults and nationalities where I know the country will take them back very, very quickly.
Okay, so Haitians and Guatemalans. And then there's other populations. Who's next? Who's next after those two? Hondurans, right, right. We're talking about Guatemalans, Hondurans, Nicaragans, you know, the ones that the countries that are where you see daily, just in, you know, in the news and the reporting by DHS and Homeland Security, where are the most removal flights occurring? Those are the countries that accept those flights.
But if I'm in this scenario where I'm the head of ICE for Trump, all the rules of engagement and policies are out the window. Why not load up a few plain loads of Cuban nationals and send them to the Bahamas and just send them to a third party? Why not just I could go find a country that says they'll accept three or four plain loads of Cuban nationals and I'll send them to a third party country?
Jason says ICE can focus on getting people in eight major cities with airport hubs. Philadelphia, D.C., Chicago, Houston, Miami, Denver, New York, and L.A. Those have access to quick ICE flights to people's home countries. Jason thinks ICE can get people out before they can get to a judge or a lawyer. And one way to catch a lot of people quickly, especially the ones who snuck in and ICE has no info on, is to bring back work-site enforcement.
AKA large-scale raids. The Biden administration stopped doing those. Do you think there would be raids then in the first hundred days? I think there would be raids within the first three weeks. Really? Yeah. Those are not hard to like turn on. Like those are not to operationalize those. Those aren't like where would they do them?
You know, you would go back to where there's big ICE and customer border protection resources to do sort of enforcement, and you would do them in communities that would show the most, you know, the most cruelty, right? So there's nothing that would stop, you know, Trump administration from going into the workplace, going into, you know, our hospitality sector, going into like restaurants or businesses and arresting individuals at scale.
Can you like walk through what that would look like? What do you think that would look like? Well, I mean, I think it would be very easy to focus on industries that have large numbers and high numbers of migrants working within them. What would stop them from going within into a meat processing plan in Virginia, right?
Say there's a couple hundred migrants, there's 80 on shift that day. You go in, you know, there's one individual there that has a final order removal, maybe has a non-violent criminal background. You go in, you do the raid, you line all the workers up, and you start checking status of each and every one of them, right? And then, or maybe you just arrest them all, bring them into detention.
And then do the checks to see who was removable. There's nothing that could stop ICE at that point from just bringing people into custody, detaining them, and then figuring out who was removable at that time. Tom Holman has not denied this, by the way. He said publicly, something like this would be necessary. Holman also said he would do national security threats first, but then raids, sure.
Jason says the raids under a 2.0 Trump administration could be more militarized with SWAT style teams. That's not how they've been done in the past. He also told me he thinks nothing would stop ICE from going into hospitals or schools or churches. Normally ICE doesn't do that, but this is just a policy, not a law. So after doing these raids and trying to get people out quickly, ICE would be left with lots of immigrants that they have to hold until they can get them deported.
I wanted to know, where would you hold all these people? Would you build tent camps to hold people? If it's I'm not looking out for the care of the law enforcement officers that are overseeing it or the migrants, yes, you could. When we did all the EVACs and ICE had a very big support in the evacuation out of Afghanistan,
We brought on soft-sided facilities at Fort Dix, New Jersey, and other places around the country. But again- Soft-sided facilities? Is that euphemism for tents? Well, I mean, that is you, yes. They're big sort of like, like fair tent, like carnival tents. They're very thick, plastic, and they're soft. But what I'm saying is, is let's say we put a thousand- You're like, they're weatherproof, they're weatherproof, but they're deep. Well, they're not just like, they're not just like, you know, Coleman tents, you know, that you would get to go camping. But what I'm saying is like,
But the problem here is, is those Afghanis were coming to safety. Now you're saying, I'm going to bring on a soft side tent to hold people so I can remove them in like 90 days. The idea that they're just going to like, okay, I'm going to live in this deplorable conditions and not cause on rent, that's where it gets very dangerous.
dangerous because Jason thinks there would be fights, riots. People would be hurt, possibly even die, he thinks. And just so I'm clear here, yes, he means immigrants, but also officers. Jason's very concerned about the safety of the ICE officers. Where else can you hold people you want to deport? Can you house migrants and jails? Yes. Could you lower jailing standards to put more people in a cell?
Yes. Well, yes. Absolutely. Right. Like I'm saying, could you, our standard before was three people per cell. Now we're saying it's six. That is policy. It is not law. So yes, of course you could. Okay. Could you turn places quickly into detention centers or camps? Like can you change the standards to make it faster? Yes. I could, I could have between FEMA and ICE and DHS, we could have
We could turn on 25 old warehouses, old department stores in a week. Wow, in a week. So definitely doable in the first 100 days. It would just be a cement building with some mats. And then I make sure we have porta potties, some food, right? I have a couple of docks there in case somebody gets really sick. And then I bring in a couple of hundred security guards. I could do that in a week.
At the end of the 100 days, how many people do you think will be gone? Let's just say this. Let's say all rules are out there and I can remove people that aren't removable. Like I'm going to send them to third party countries. ICE has 48,000 people in its custody now. ICE has 14 ICE planes that are hardened planes. They hold 135, 135 souls.
I need more of those, but why I'm sending those 48,000, I'm probably gonna go out and bring another 50 to 100,000 into custody. So if you're talking 30 to 60 days, you could remove 150 to 200,000 people. So 200,000 people in the first 60 days. So in the first 100 that gives you at what, like, how many? I mean, you could get, if all rules are gone and I can remove them anywhere, you could get, you know, you could do a million,
a million people. Of course, Jason's predicting here, assuming there will be no major roadblocks. But the Brennan Center did this thing where they stress tested with experts in government people whether mass deportations could be done. Game this all out. In their simulations, funding was a big obstacle right away. So their deportation numbers weren't as large as Jason's. But that was also assuming that the House wouldn't go Republican, which is looking like it will be, as I record this.
that would make Jason's math of a million people more possible. And when a million people disappear from the country, it's more than just bodies gone. There's ripple effects. One, we'll see massive inflation continue in this country because we just pulled a million people out of our workforce. GDP, businesses, small business, especially, and then we'll see thousands of people losing their jobs and small businesses closing, et cetera. Two,
Law enforcement activity, federal specifically, and in cities and states where state and local law enforcement is supporting this mass deportation program will halt, halt. Going out and arresting the rapist and murder in your county will stop why your sheriff
is over playing grab ass with home men and these individuals and trying to do some big mass deportation scheme and throwing grandma back to Cuba. So law enforcement will be chilled. Three migrants will go deeper into the shadows. They will do
the steps they need to stay in our country because it's so much better than going back and risking death in another that they will hide even more into the shadows. And so those that are left behind, it's like they become ghosts. They might stop showing up to work. Maybe they'll move.
You'll notice the missing at your local grocery store, your bar, your daycare. And at the same time, your screens will be broadcasting the deportations on TV, on social media, shouting the images of a million who are actually gone. Jason thinks this will be strategic. I think there's going to be
like lined up planes, engines running imagery of mass removals. I think they're going to grab people and intentionally break our policy, like break the law and throw some people back to their home country. And then when the courts push back, they can be like, see what the courts made us stop. And then because then they can go, Hey, look at these bureaucratic, bureaucratic pencil necks getting in our way. This is the deep state. This is the deep state.
I guess my thing is to what end though. Winning the midterms? You think it's all political, you don't think there's any ideological thing that he wants out of it? Sure, I think he's ill-equipped. I think he's, but there's 8 million on the immigration docket now. How many people are
have status here on our first generation migrants, or like from migrant families. I mean, we're talking, this would affect like 50 million to 100 million people, like these sort of actions. The idea that there isn't political out like consequences to that, even for Donald Trump, I don't, I think the pendulum would swing back. I'm not so sure. I think it's way harder for the pendulum to swing back.
If you look at the Democrats immigration platform, what you see is the border bill that Biden tried to pass. That bill is the most restrictive immigration bill we've seen in years. It's a child born out of the Trump administration, but also parented by the Democrats, making a harsh agenda seem way more middle of the road.
Think piece after think piece uses this failed bill as an example of how far to the right we moved on immigration. How much enforcement and severity have taken over? How much the idea of a nation of immigrants is dusty and Pollyanna-ish? This fall, a Brookings poll said that about a third of Americans agree with Trump's quote that undocumented immigrants are poisoning the blood of the country. Poisoning the blood. This phrase chills me.
It's not about legality or order. It's visceral. It's guttural repulsion. It is a violent feeling about a massive group of people. And when the precedent is the one that leads it, it's not just a feeling anymore. It becomes an action. Howdy, Raymond. She's an editor on our show.
Two days after the election, two of our producers, Emmanuel Jochi and Lily Sullivan, went to this church near our office in New York City, where on certain days, there are migrants and asylum seekers getting free legal advice, meals, and they met this guy, Roberto, who told him that he arrived in the U.S. five months ago from Ecuador, and he's been having trouble sleeping ever since election day.
Well, and I joined you in the studio, Halo. Hey, I read. So you spoke with him? Yeah. He's been staying in a shelter nearby. And he says he can already picture it. What the ice rates there would be like. He says, let me describe it like a movie.
He pictures a group of 100, 200 men arriving who lock up the building and go floor to floor. No one would be able to get out. And they load them up into buses or cars or whatever ice uses. And deport them. Like that's what you hear about. So that's what he imagines about how it might go.
On the streets, he feels a little freer, he told me. Because if someone tried to grab him, he could just run. Like he'd have that option. But in the shelter, he's between four walls. There's nowhere to run.
I asked him, where do you feel safe? He told me, here, in the church where I talked to him. There's no other place where he can feel calm. Because he tells me, ice can't come into the church. Of course, in President Trump's next term, that might not be true. Yeah. Like, we have this idea of sanctuary spaces, but anytime ice decides they want to go into churches or hospitals or schools, they can do that.
Back to, nobody loves our Latino community and our Puerto Rican community more than I do. So Donald Trump won record numbers of Latino voters this year, more than any Republican candidate since they started tracking that demographic and exit polls back in the 1970s.
So, how did it happen? Ike Shree's Condorajah spent the day with a guy who's been gunning for this for years. I first met Sam Negron a few weeks ago, outside a Trump rally in Allentown, Pennsylvania. He's waiting in the VIP line because one, he's a constable. That's like an elected sheriff. And two, he volunteers a lot for the campaign. Knox on Doors, does phone calls? Is something called a Trump force captain?
and works with Latinos for Trump. Sam? I never had no cool nicknames like Pookie or Tito. It's just Sam. Sam's a proud Puerto Rican, big guy, classic cop haircut, and he gets personal fast. When I tell him Ike is my nickname, he says, we tend to do that in America, shorten things. Then he calls me his brother. You should be recording this.
We're surrounded by the long lines of Trump supporters who start chanting because they see a protest coming down the street. It's maybe a couple dozen people waving Puerto Rican flags. They're with a Latinx social justice group, here to protest the island of garbage comment that a comedian recently made at a Trump rally.
A couple of Sam's friends from Latinos for Trump rush over. They're gonna cross the street to go confront the anti-Trump protesters. And they ask Sam to join. He tells them, I don't like to fight. Let them speak. I didn't hear what there was in my mind.
Another Trump supporter nearby, a white lady in a red shirt, is shouting over us at this whole scrum of Spanish speakers. Not really differentiating between the Trump supporters and the Trump protesters. She says, they don't even speak English. Go back to your own fucking country.
Yeah, see, that's not cool. What do you do with that? Things like that. It's not cool. But you know what? I'm Puerto Rican, Bobby. I grew up in the South Bronx in the 70s. I've gotten racism from everybody because you see my color, right? I'm very light skin. Growing up in the South Bronx wasn't easy in the 70s. Doesn't get under your skin, is what you're saying. No. So I tend to ignore that. You know what I found out? Working on this campaign? That is not the majority.
For most of his life, Sam supported Democrats. But in 2016, he broke with the party. Protest voted for Jill Stein.
He got into Trump from videos, shared by a Latino Trump supporter. Then, just in the past two years, he lost both his son and his son-in-law. They overdosed on fentanyl. He says it's a big problem in allentown. And he felt like the Democrats and Biden weren't helping. It made him want Trump back even more.
So, he started evangelizing, trying to convert people. He's got lit and signs, bariquas for Trump, dominicans for Trump. He's got these little scratch-offs for Trump. He was lonely at first in this democratic city, but slowly, it started to feel like it was working. He'd been stepping it up for months. And then, island of garbage dropped on him. I hear my wife going, look, what just came out of here?
Look what they said, you know, see what's furious. It was hurtful because that's where they're from, but also frustrating because he's been out here in these streets trying to pull his people one by one towards Trump. I was double upset because I'm like, one, that's an ugly joke. Two, there goes all the work I've done for the last four or five years.
Did you think those comments might just cost him the whole election? Totally, brother. Oh my God, there goes everything we've done. Right out the window. So how to reconcile all this? Being a proud Puerto Rican and a die-hard Trump supporter? For Sam, it took 20 minutes of googling. Any time something controversial comes out of that campaign, there's something else behind it. You know what I found out? Here's how he explains that there was actually a deeper message hidden inside that joke.
Puerto Rico is drowning in trash. They haven't been able to get rid of their trash for the last four years. There's 29 dump sites all over Puerto Rico that are mountains of trash because they can't burn because of carbon emissions. And who did that? Back four years ago, it wasn't as bad. It went way overboard four years ago. So that's what I believe was the reference that was being made to.
20 minutes of research got Sam from LiveIt about a potentially campaign derailing bad joke to outrage at an environmental disaster he lays at the feet of the Biden administration. If that sounds like opportunistic reasoning, Sam gets that. Did you need to find a reason for it? Heck yeah! I needed a reason for it. Like I said, I... So he went on a mission the weekend before the election to do damage control.
tell people what he learned and get them to vote for Trump. He also wanted to give people a chance to talk through the ways they felt let down by Democrats. I tagged along because I wanted to know if people would buy it. And part of what I heard helped me understand why Trump took a historic share of the Latino vote.
In the way Sam's doing it, he's not following an orderly list of registered R or independent voters. He's going off book. Here in the Supremo Grocery Store parking lot in the heart of a Latino neighborhood, it's a busy Sunday. There's a lot of shoppers, steady flow of people on the sidewalk. It's a target rich environment. Hi. Good, Mommy, how you doing? You voting this year?
Come talk to me. Sam spots a Puerto Rican woman he knows pulling into the parking lot. You parking? Go park. Come talk to me. Right. That's the problem. Damned if I do. Damned if I don't. She yells from the car. This is Melissa. Sam and her clearly go back. But he says he doesn't know how she's going to vote. Don't do it. I got a bad filter right now. I'm feeling right now. I've sat. Uh-huh. But what are you upset about?
What I've said is that I'm a taxpayer and I don't get a shit. And you got other people that come into our country and they give them everything. But then you want to stay here and you want to downgrade Spanish people. Make that shit make sense." She's upset about Democrats giving support to new arrivals in the country, instead of focusing on the people already here, who like herself. She also doesn't tolerate insults against Spanish-speaking people. So she doesn't like her options.
What could we talk about Sunday a week ago at the garden? A joke the comedian made? Yeah. About the honor of the garbage? Okay. How you feel about that? How you feel about it? Live it. Sam walks her through how he figured out the island of garbage comment is actually a sneaky PSA about landfill mismanagement. Melissa listens. So that's what I believe was the reference that was being made to.
How does that sit with you? That's fact, that's what you call facts, but again, everybody's so much into the social media. The social media only portrays one side of each story in this time, what I mean. So if you sit here and you analyze both side of the stories, like I said earlier in my car, damn it, dude, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it, damn it
Not true. Illegal immigrants can't vote.
Where does that put us that have been here all our lives? And that's a right. That's a citizenship right. That's not a human right. That's a citizenship right. You want to vote, go back to your country and vote. Not in a bad way, not meaning that you should go back to your country. But you know what? Get in line and wait like everybody else. Because there's been a lot of legal immigrants in this country that have been here for years still waiting for their papers. Thousands on lawyers. And can't even vote.
The backdrop here is that Sam and Melissa are Puerto Rican. They're already citizens who can vote if they live on the mainland. They don't have to wait in any sort of line. Eight years ago, Melissa supported Hillary. She says Bill Clinton was a hell of a president. Now, she likes Trump in spite of the comment.
Was I in the same boat a couple of years ago? Absolutely not. I want to him out. You know, I didn't want to keep dealing with that. And that's not what I mean.
Great businessman. Great businessman. Well, for him, what was his filter? And how he speaks to people. You understand? He got no hair. I'm not talking. But let's be realistic here. The way he spoke in front of our kids, you're the president. But he put it out there. And again, me being a person who doesn't have no filter myself, I can understand that. But there's a time and a place for everything. But at this point, I've had to go here and then go there, because I don't want to get more
Digged in a hole there when I am now and get the same shit that I got for the past four years. Melissa ends the conversation by telling Sam she'll vote for Trump.
Sam approaches another Puerto Rican guy, a soft-spoken young man named Marcus, and asks him how he felt about the insult. I think he said it was, do you guys know there's an island of garbage falling in the ocean? I think it's called Puerto Rico. How'd that make you feel, puppy? I mean, as a Puerto Rican, it made me feel like shit. Trust me, I would live it, but I was mad. I was. But what that did for me
I went online and started looking up, is there a problem in Puerto Rico with any type of garbage or anything? You know what I found out? Sam takes Marcus through his spiel, from livid to landfill. Seems like it's sinking in. They talk more about the price of eggs, just smart, given Marcus just left the grocery store. And after Sam finishes, I ask Marcus how he feels about Sam's explanation about the island of garbage.
I mean, when I first heard it, I was appalled, you know what I mean, that our leadership could speak so disgustingly about us that way. And even as he was just mentioning it right now, it's just disgusting. He's still pissed about the comment, but he was planning to vote for Trump anyway. And Sam's explanation.
It just made it feel all the much better, you know what I mean? That there's a valuable explanation as to his comment, because that's who I'm leaning towards is Trump. So it feels very good to know that. The next guy, a Spanish speaker carrying a large bag of dog food, didn't even need to hear Sam's explanation. He just wants to share his critique of the Democrats' failures. Here's Jose.
I was saying that neither party wants to fix immigration. Obama had two years to do something when the Democrats controlled the House and the Senate, and they didn't. And is he going to vote for Trump? He's voting for Trump too. The garbage joke? People can get past that.
But what they can't get past is how Democrats have been letting them down in a bunch of different ways. Sam is pleased.
I'm feeling a lot more positive than I was a couple of days ago, and I'm glad that, especially the Puerto Ricans that we did talk to, we're still gonna support them regardless. We all feel the same way, we're mad about the comet, it upset us, but it's policy over feelings, brother. You cleaned up today. I feel a lot better, brother, because I was worried. I thought I was gonna come out here, I had to put it on the boxing gloves, you know, to get out with people, and it hasn't been that at all.
I don't think you've met a Harris number. Nope. And they're out here. Sam did talk to one Harris supporter, a younger Dominican man. The man says he can't vote. He'd like to become a citizen, vote someday. Again, this is where a traditional canvasser would pivot. That's not Sam.
If he could vote, he'd vote for Kamala. Hey, there's one. Now, this close to the election, campaigns are a numbers game, a maximizing turnout of eligible, like-minded voters. This guy's neither.
The guy says he wants a change, and Sam sees an opening. A change from what? Sam makes his pitch for Trump and asks him to think about it.
I love them thinking. He's almost flipped. My whole mission is to wake people up in my community, to me it's not about the vote, to me it's about our people, and that's the way I look at it. To Sam, it's the long game.
This isn't just about the election that just happened. It's about the next one, and the next one, and the one after that. Aixree's Condoraja is a producer on our show.
Coming up, all those people in Trump's enemies list who he's been calling for retribution against, are they packing their bags? We check in with a couple. That's in a minute from Chicago Public Radio when our program continues.
to American life from our glass today's program. This is the cake we baked. Today, we have stories of people who have some special personal investment in the outcome of this week's election. And we look at what's coming for them. We have arrived at act three of our show, act three, come retribution.
So in the final weeks of his campaign, Donald Trump only stepped up his threats of retribution against his political enemies, including saying he'd use the military to go after the enemy within. The people who have been keeping an eye on these sorts of comments are Alexander and Rachel Vinman. Alex is the army officer who officially reported what seemed like an improper phone call between President Trump and the president of Ukraine, which led to Trump's first impeachment trial. Rachel's his wife.
Back in March, I visited them and they did not agree about what they were going to do. President Trump won another term and started taking revenge. Rachel said they should consider leaving the country that things got bad enough. Alex said he'd never consider that. No, not possible. I think the fact is that I've served a full military career to protect this country and I'm not going to give it up.
My argument is if Donald Trump is reelected, this will no longer be that country. This will be the place where that country was. I want to be able to leave if I feel like that's what I need to, to protect mainly my daughter. We were doing this interview in their living room and we were standing because they hadn't bought furniture for it yet.
They wanted to wait and see what the outcome of the election was going to be first. For Alex, this was just prudence and saving money against an uncertain future. For Rachel, it was maybe we'll have to leave this house. When I reached out this week, after the election, Alex didn't return my text to set up an interview, but Rachel was happy to talk. She told me they did finally bite the bullet and bite furniture. In those early days when Kamala Harris took over as the Democratic nominee,
We have two sofas and we have a coffee table and like a side piece thing. So that's measured. We ordered it kind of after all the buzz about her and, you know, everyone was very excited and we are just like, we're, we're going to stay here. And I think we were very optimistic, so.
In the months leading up to the election, Alex and Rachel have both been campaigning actively for Harris, speaking at fundraisers, that kind of thing. Rachel said she's probably done three events a week for the last six weeks on video or in person in all seven swing states. We did plan to talk on election night once the winner was clear. But when I texted them, Rachel wrote back, she didn't fill up to talking. I am freaking out, she said. When we got on the phone later in the week, I asked if their views had changed since we talked in March.
Was it still that she would consider leaving the country and he wouldn't? Nothing is off the table, but I want to stay because this is my country. And I think there's a possibility to continue to be here and to be part of the discussion and make a difference. Alex
Absolutely wants to say it's not even a question. So maybe my decision is just based on his obstinate that it's a non starter. So I have to. Bring myself around to that reality.
I thought of you guys in the last weeks of the campaign when it seemed like Donald Trump was increasing his calls for retaliation and talking about going after the enemies within the country. Like, what do the two of you think this is going to mean for you? Do you feel like you're going to be facing some sort of retaliation? Do you feel like it's just a complete open question? Like, where are you on this? We have no idea. I mean, it all depends on signals from
Their actions. That's the only way we'll know is to see what they're doing. But there is this guy who has a retaliation list. It's a long list. It's like 350 people or something like that. And Alex's name is on it.
This is a list that was circulating on social media, put together by a Trump supporter of people that he thinks deserve revenge. He has no affiliation with Trump. There's no sign that anybody in Trump world listens to him. But seeing Alex's name there was alarming. A reminder of how visible Alex is as somebody who stood up to the president and how likely a target he is for the real people in power. So that's a concern by
Are they going to retaliate against all of those people will be all at once like crystal docked or will it be over time? And, you know, do we have time? I don't if that's the road they go down. I mean, I don't know. Or will they just do it on January 20th? Yeah. But we'll definitely be watching the indicators and kind of a
A list of criteria, you know, to say if this, then this, you know, some kind of places or inflection points, which is terrifying, but we certainly haven't gotten to that point. And like everyone, we're trying to process all of this. Can you name another one of the indicators that you're going to keep an eye on? Okay, ramp up talks about retaliation. Then yes, you know, but maybe it was election rhetoric and that's not something that's going to come up.
There are so many unknowns with Trump. He's going to do a lot of things that he doesn't do. They're going to keep an eye on his appointments, especially who he appoints as Secretary of Defense. Rachel pictures that retaliation against Alex could be as small as they try to take his retirement benefits, his health care and pension. Or as big as they could put him on trial for his actions and the impeachment hearings. She really doesn't know what to expect. What's your feeling? What's your gut?
My head says it'll probably be okay. My heart is very scared. But I don't want to live my life in fear. I don't want to live in my own country afraid when neither I nor my husband has done anything wrong.
Rachel Vinman. We reached out to the other people we interviewed in March for the episode we did about possible retribution Donald Trump might take to see how concerned they are about what might happen to them now. Former Trump aide Stephanie Grisham didn't return our calls. Fred Wellman, who used to be at the Lincoln Project, said he was watching to see how things are going to unfold. And he's gaming out possible scenarios for what he might do.
At four, I've done an unbelievable job on the abortion question. So I think as everybody knows at this point, Kamala Harris and the Democrats were betting that abortion rights would help put her over the top. And ten different states had abortion rights measures on their ballots. Seven of those passed. And there was a very particular kind of TV ad that aired in many of those states.
all of the very particular feeling and particular music, very similar language. In these ads, women whose lives have been put at risk, from complications with their pregnancies, told their stories to explain why abortion bans needed to be lifted. One of our producers, Miki Mink, became interested in these commercials. This week, she checked in with a few of the people who appeared in them. Here's Miki.
Since Roe was struck down two years ago, I've been reporting on pregnant women and doctors and states with abortion bans. And I've noticed that it's almost always the same group of women, about 20 and all, being called on again and again to recount the worst moments of their lives. In media interviews, in court cases, at their state legislatures and in Congress. I don't love it to be perfectly honest. I feel like that's Kimberly Pasica, who was denied an abortion in Nebraska. She shared her story in one of those ads.
It's disheartening that we are putting the toughest conversation on the people who are affected the most and having to relive that trauma and just relive the worst parts of their life to try and make change. And even today I'm sitting here and I'm exhausted. Like how am I even standing here still? The last two plus months has just been exhausting.
You see online and people are like, we have to keep fighting. And I'm like, I have been fighting. Where have you been? Nebraska's abortion rights measure failed this week. I actually made the joke to my husband yesterday. I was like, all my new followers on Twitter are going to be so disappointed when I start just posting about like basketball and football again. Until we resolve the issue, I feel like I'll always say something. But, um,
I am going to have to step away from it for a little bit, just for my sanity, I think. I don't think I'll ever stop pushing how important the issue is, though, because until there aren't any bands, some woman's always going to be affected, some girl's going to be affected, and I hate that for this country. Of all the ads I watched, Deborah Dorberts really got to me. It was so emotional, I almost couldn't finish it.
Deborah's 34 years old and from Florida. She's got a six-year-old son. Two years ago, she was 23 weeks pregnant with her second child when she went into her doctor's office for a routine scan and learned that her baby had a lethal and rare condition called potter syndrome. He had no kidneys. His lungs weren't developing. If he survived birth, he wouldn't live long. Maybe just minutes.
Her doctor recommended she terminate the pregnancy as soon as possible. She was now at higher risk for preeclampsia, which could kill her. Deborah agreed. She also didn't want her baby to suffer. But Florida had just banned all abortions after 15 weeks, with some rare and vague exceptions. Deborah says the hospital told her that because her baby still had a heartbeat, it couldn't help her. They were actually wrong about this.
Florida's law allows for abortions in cases where there's a lethal fetal anomaly, up to 28 weeks. But there's a lot of fear and confusion among doctors and hospitals and states with bans. So Deborah had to carry the baby to term, knowing all along he wouldn't survive. She and her husband named him Milo. He lived for 94 minutes.
Deborah's husband told me he didn't expect her to speak publicly, seemed out of character, and it felt that way to her too. Deborah describes herself as shy, reserved, conflict-diverse. But while she was still pregnant with Milo, she was so angry and depressed that she decided to talk to a reporter from the Washington Post. And after she gave birth, she decided to keep talking. Is there a specific conversation or interaction you had with someone where you realized like I did change? Their opinion is about Florida's abortion law.
My parents, my parents, they are very conservative people and it was my dad having witnessed what I went through when, you know, he found out the news and then he found out that I could not
get induced and I was being forced to carry to full term and he had to watch his daughter suffer for months and he didn't understand why I could not get the care I needed.
Her parents are Catholic, and before this, they were against abortion. But seeing her experience up close changed them. So when the organizers of the ballot measure in Florida approached her to do a TV ad, she said, yes. The measure would put abortion rights into the state constitution. I remember the doctor handing me a baby boy that was blue, and I just held him because he was so cold.
In the ad, Deborah is sitting on a couch in a green dress. Her husband Lee is right next to her. His arm wrapped around her. Government had no right to do that to my family. This van is torture.
Governor DeSantis fought the abortion measure hard. He sent plain, closed police to knock on doors looking for fraudulent signatures on the petition for the ballot measure. The Florida Health Department sent cease and desist letters to TV stations airing a different ad that supported the measure. A judge fighting with the TV stations wrote, to keep it simple for the state of Florida, it's the First Amendment stupid.
On election night, Debra and her husband headed to a watch party with organizers of the ballot measure, a group called Yes on Four. There were balloons everywhere, a full bar. Debra felt hopeful and had a speech prepared if the measure got passed.
Ever since Roe was overturned, whenever voters got a chance to vote on abortion measures like this one, they passed, even in red states. Around 9 p.m., the results were in. A clear majority of Floridians voted in favor of the ballot initiative, but it still failed because in Florida, ballot measures need 60% of the vote to pass. It got 57%.
We were upstairs in a private little room just waiting for the results. And once they told me that yes, on four failed, it was just honestly, it was a shock. It was like a punch in the stomach. And it just brought me back to that day in the doctor's office. And it was just that shock and that numb.
We did go downstairs to hear the director speak. And after she spoke and a few other guests spoke, I remember getting up out of the room and going outside. And that is when I just broke down crying. And my husband came and found me and I was just, I was on my knees and crying because it just,
The law took everything from me. It's one thing to decide to tell this painful story over and over, but it's another thing to do it and not get the results you wanted. It's hard. You feel like a lot of weight is on your shoulders.
to try to get the government and legislation to understand, like, look what these laws are doing. You know, I do feel tired. I, you know, just sharing my story is a lot of work. Do you ever have the feeling of when can I be done and stop talking about this?
So yesterday we spent a lot of time navigating. Do we keep fighting this fight or do we just step away? And for me, like I'm up on the fence. Like I don't want to back down now. Like I want to see through that the law gets changed.
What people don't see when Deborah tells her story in public is how hard she's still trying to get back to real life. Just enjoy small moments again. Crotty class is on Thursdays, pizza night on Fridays, with her husband and her six-year-old son. Make him make this producer in our shell.
They're all thunder down the line. And they're just a mericopa. Say you're made in front is wrong.
Well, our show today was produced and edited by Lars D'Archesky and Emmanuel Berry. People who put together today's program include Beem Aduwunmi Fiebenin, Dana Chippish-Shan Cole, Michael Comite, Emmanuel Jochi, Hani Hawassley, Valerie Kipnis, Henry Larson, Sethlyn, Katnare Mondo, Stonelson, Ryan Rumory, Alyssa Shipley, Spiegel, Lily Sullivan, Christopher Sootala, Alyssa Robertson, Dexter, Matt Tierney, and Diane Wu, our managing editors, Sara Abdul-Rahman, our senior editors, David Kestenbaum.
Special thanks to Data Andrea Flores, Erin Reich on Melnick, Jonathan Blitzer, Miriam Rosenbaum, Colin Jackson, John Smith, Patrice Johnson, Fields Moseley, Jen Feifield, Ben Giles, Yvonne Wingette Sanchez, Ben Terrace, Neil Mihiga, Rebecca Tyrell, Drew Resinger, Kathy Klein, Paul Choi, Jordan Green, Lee Doerbert, Adama Pa, Candace Braun and Para Mulu, of artist-athletes, activists in New York City.
This American Life is delivered to public radio stations by PRX, the public radio exchange, to become a This American Life partner, and get bonus content, ad-free listening, ask me anything sessions, and a greatest hit archive of hundreds of favorite episodes right in your podcast feed. Sign up at thisamericanlife.org slash life partners. Thanks this week to Life Partners Curate Alert, Rachel McFarland, Martha Stroud, and Lauren Talerman.
Thanks as always, your program's co-founder, Mr. Tory Malatea. You know, he is such an annoying person to meditate with. Seriously, every time we're finally into it and have quieted our minds, he starts chanting super loudly. This is the Deep State. This is the Deep State. I'm Aaron Glass. Back next week with more stories of this American life.
Next week on the podcast for This American Life, this animal rights activist gets a call one day from a Hollywood producer who gave him a mission. He was like, nobody else can do this. You have to do this. The kids are depending on it. Will you try? That mission? Take a captive killer whale, a tame creature that does tricks. Somehow teach it to be wild again, put it on a plane, and fly at home to set it free.
in real life. True story. Next week on the podcast on your local public radio station.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
848: The Official Unofficial Record
This American Life
Hundreds of thousands of Venezuelans work to verify their presidential election votes, despite official dispute. Simultaneously in Michigan, US, Republicans challenge vote count but accept it when they do the counting themselves.
November 24, 2024
847: The Truly Incredible Story of Keiko the Killer Whale
This American Life
The series 'The Good Whale' reveals the story of Keiko, a captured killer whale who lived in an adventure park and was later rehabilitated for release into the ocean.
November 17, 2024
845: A Small Thing That Gives Me a Tiny Shred of Hope
This American Life
A podcast explores a man aiming to bridge political divides, a politically divided couple searching for trustworthy news, an individual making tactical voting decisions, and views on politics in dating.
November 03, 2024
660: Hoaxing Yourself
This American Life
Two individuals (Sean Cole and Joel Lovell) adopted false identities in their teenage years - Sean spoke with a British accent for 2 years, while Joel lied about his diet and parents at college. Also featured is a con man involved in a telemarketing scam and Shalom Auslander's account of manipulating a school bee competition to impress his mother.
October 27, 2024
Ask this episodeAI Anything
Hi! You're chatting with This American Life AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history