Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Decline of the Whaling Industry: Historical Significance and Current StateWhaling has greatly diminished over time due to shifting demands, technology advancements, and economic changes, leading to a significant decrease in the number of whaling ships worldwide.

      Whaling, once a significant industry, has greatly diminished over time due to various factors such as the decline in demand for whale products, changing technologies, and economic shifts. While Norway, Japan, and Iceland are three countries that still engage in commercial whaling, the number of whaling ships has significantly decreased. The American whaling industry, once flourishing, collapsed in the late 19th century due to the replacement of whale oil with fossil fuels and the rise of new, safer job opportunities. It is also highlighted that the perception and consumption of whale meat vary greatly across different countries, with Japan having hundreds of recipes and unique ways of using all parts of the whale. Overall, the conversation sheds light on the historical significance and current state of the whaling industry.

    • Global Ban on Commercial Whaling with ExceptionsAlthough commercial whaling is largely banned worldwide, Norway, Japan, and Iceland continue the practice. Indigenous communities in various countries are also permitted to hunt whales for sustenance.

      Commercial whaling is largely banned globally under the International Whaling Commission's moratorium. However, Norway, Japan, and Iceland are exceptions to this ban. Indigenous communities in various countries, including the U.S., Canada, Russia, Greenland, Indonesia, St. Vincent and the Grenadines, and Denmark, are also allowed to hunt whales for sustenance. Norway, as the largest commercial whaler, justifies its whaling as a sustainable industry, although there is little demand for whale meat. The decision for Norway to leave the International Whaling Commission's moratorium in 1992 was met with strong international controversy and protests. The reasons for Norway's continued whaling are primarily based on maintaining the industry for cultural and economic reasons, rather than specific justifications like preserving the herring supply.

    • Advancements in technology revolutionize the whaling industryTechnological advancements in whaling, particularly in Norway, allowed for hunting in new territories, targeting larger species, and overcoming challenges, ultimately surpassing the declining American whaling industry.

      Whaling, as an industry, underwent significant technological advancements that revolutionized the way it was conducted. While American whaling was considered primitive and relied on rowing boats and harpooners, Norwegian whaling embraced industrialization and employed steamships along with a powerful harpoon cannon. This allowed Norwegian whalers to hunt in new territories, such as Antarctica, where they targeted larger species like humpback and blue whales. The advanced technology also addressed the challenge of dealing with the massive size and quick sinking of these whales. These innovations not only enabled the Norwegians to establish the modern whaling industry but also surpassed the capabilities of the declining American whaling industry. The conversation highlights the role of technology and inventions in shaping the course of whaling history.

    • The Norwegian Whaling Industry: Innovation and Economic ImpactThe Norwegian whaling industry thrived through innovation and adaptation, whereas the U.S. whaling industry overlooked it due to the rapid growth of other lucrative industries.

      The Norwegian whaling industry was highly innovative and played a significant role in the country's economy. The industry evolved by using hoses and pumps to extract whale oil, leading to the development of massive "floating factories" accompanied by smaller ships for hunting and processing whales. While other countries did adopt these technologies, the U.S. whaling industry did not show much interest due to the rapid growth and diversification of the American economy. As America became wealthier, industries like coal, petroleum, steel, and telecommunications offered greater profit opportunities. However, Norway, being a poor country at the time, saw whaling as a valuable source of revenue and employment. Despite the declining demand for whale oil, the whaling industry in Norway found alternative uses for its oil, sustaining its importance in the national economy. Overall, the conversation highlights the economic dynamics and divergent paths taken by different countries in response to technological advancements.

    • The Rise and Fall of the Whale Oil Industry and the Birth of Conservation EffortsThe demand for whale oil led to overhunting and a decline in whale populations worldwide, prompting the establishment of the International Whaling Commission to protect whales and advocate for a ban on commercial whaling.

      The demand for whale oil in the 20th century was driven by large companies in Europe and the United States for use in margarine production. However, after World War II, when Japan was struggling with food shortages, General MacArthur ordered the Japanese to increase whale hunting to alleviate the crisis. This decision saved the country for a few years and whale meat became an important source of protein, even being served in school lunches. Unfortunately, this increased demand for whale meat coincided with a sharp decline in whale populations worldwide, largely due to mechanization and industrialized whaling. In response, the International Whaling Commission was established in 1946 with the initial goal of regulating the industry in a pro-whaling way. However, eventually it transformed into an anti-whaling organization, calling for a total ban on commercial whaling.

    • The Transformation of Public Sentiment Towards Whales and the Emergence of a Conservation MovementThe release of an album showcasing whale behavior and a greater awareness of the value of clean air and water led to the banning of commercial whaling and the establishment of conservation organizations.

      There has been a significant transformation in public sentiment towards whales, leading to a ban on commercial whaling and the emergence of a conservation movement. In the 1960s, whaling reached its peak, pushing some whale species close to extinction. However, the release of an album called Songs of the Humpback Whale in 1970 shifted the public's perception by showcasing the complexities of whale behavior and captivating people's imagination. This coincided with the rise of the conservation movement and a greater awareness of the value of clean air and water. Furthermore, the availability of alternative fuel and food sources made it more logical to celebrate whales as beautiful and free creatures. These shifting perspectives led to the banning of commercial whaling and the establishment of organizations like Greenpeace, dedicated to saving these magnificent creatures.

    • Paul Watson's Journey: From Realization to Advocacy for Whale ConservationPaul Watson's love and empathy for whales led him to become a vocal advocate for their protection, using confrontational, yet nonviolent tactics to disrupt whaling operations and raise awareness about the inhumane act of killing whales for military purposes.

      Paul Watson's encounter with the Soviet ship sparked his realization that the slaughter of whales for military purposes was senseless and inhumane. He recognized the beauty, intelligence, and sentience of these magnificent creatures and was motivated to protect them. Watson's confrontational tactics, although controversial, helped drive the Save the Whales movement. Despite criticism from Greenpeace, he continues to advocate for whale conservation through the Captain Paul Watson Foundation. Watson's approach of "aggressive nonviolence" aims to prevent harm to anyone while actively disrupting whaling operations. Although the perspective of whalers themselves remains largely unheard, efforts have been made to engage in dialogue and understand their point of view. The revelations from this conversation shed light on the complex and emotional issues surrounding whale hunting and conservation.

    • The Controversial Practice of Whaling in Taiji, Japan.The town of Taiji in Japan has a long-standing tradition of whaling, which has sparked controversy and backlash from the Western world, but continues due to its economic importance.

      Taiji, a remote and quaint town in Japan, has a long history of uninterrupted whaling. The documentary film "The Cove" brought attention to the town's controversial practice of drive hunting, which involves using 12 boats to scan the horizon for whales. If a pod is spotted, the boats assemble behind it and slowly push it towards Taiji, eventually sealing off the cove with ropes. The film received backlash from the community, who saw it as another attack on their traditional way of life. In order to gain trust and access to the fishermen and community members, the American journalist had to involve himself in the society and give a speech to the union that runs the boats. The animals captured during these hunts are either taken for meat or kept alive for show. Despite the protests and concerns from the Western world, whaling in Taiji continues due to its economic significance to the town.

    • The Hidden Prices and Controversies Surrounding Taiji's Live Animal Trade and Whaling PracticesDespite strong international pressure and criticism, Japan remains resistant to ending its whaling industry due to concerns about the impact on its fisheries sector.

      The prices of live animals in Taiji are hidden and it is difficult to obtain accurate information. However, it is evident that live animals are valued much higher than those sold for meat. The film "The Cove" brought attention to the large scale slaughter of dolphins and criticized Japan's whaling practices. While Japan defended its whaling industry, it faced significant pressure from powerful environmental groups advocating for an end to whaling. Taiji, a small town with no international presence, has struggled under the pressure, but has received support domestically. Japan's concerns about the impact on its fisheries industry are a significant factor in their resistance to ending whaling.

    • The Decline in Demand for Whale Meat and the Persistence of Whaling in JapanDespite decreasing demand for whale meat, the majority of Japanese people still support whaling, considering it an important cultural tradition, leading to the continued practice of whaling in Japan, Norway, and Iceland.

      The demand for whale meat has significantly decreased over the years, while the global demand for tuna remains strong. Although whale meat used to be highly sought after in Japan in the '80s and '90s, it now fetches much lower prices. However, despite the declining consumption of whale meat, polls suggest that a majority of Japanese people still support whaling or Japan's right to whale, even if they don't personally consume it. The pressure from the outside world has actually strengthened Japan's resolve to continue whaling, as it is seen as a part of their cultural tradition. While progress has been made in reducing whaling in certain countries, like Spain, Australia, and Chile, the battle against whaling is far from over, with Japan, Norway, and Iceland defiantly continuing the practice.

    • The complex moral and economic factors behind whaling and the challenges faced by the industryWhaling is facing declining demand and a decreasing number of whalers, raising the question of whether we are moving towards a post-whaling world. However, other threats such as noise pollution and fishing nets also harm whale populations.

      Whaling is a complex issue driven by both moral and economic factors. While some argue that whaling is a sustainable practice and justifies it as no different than slaughtering other animals for consumption, others view it as morally wrong. However, the whaling industry is facing numerous struggles, including a lack of demand for whale meat and a declining number of whalers. This raises the question of whether we are entering a post-whaling world. Interestingly, the conversation also highlights that whales are still being killed, but not through hunting. Other factors, such as offshore wind farms, noise pollution, and fishing nets, pose threats to whale populations. The upcoming episode will explore these issues and shed light on the enduring relevance of reading Moby-Dick.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    597. Why Do Your Eyeglasses Cost $1,000?

    597. Why Do Your Eyeglasses Cost $1,000?

    A single company, EssilorLuxottica, owns so much of the eyewear industry that it’s hard to escape their gravitational pull — or their “obscene” markups. Should regulators do something? Can Warby Parker steal market share? And how did Ray-Bans become a luxury brand? (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Neil Blumenthal, co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker.
      • Dave Gilboa, co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker.
      • Jessica Glasscock, fashion historian and lecturer at the Parsons School of Design.
      • Neil Handley, curator of the British Optical Association Museum at the College of Optometrists.
      • Ryan McDevitt, professor of economics at Duke University.
      • Cédric Rossi, equity research analyst at Bryan Garnier.
      • Tim Wu, professor of law, science and technology at Columbia Law School.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 18, 2024

    EXTRA: People Aren’t Dumb. The World Is Hard. (Update)

    EXTRA: People Aren’t Dumb. The World Is Hard. (Update)

    You wouldn’t think you could win a Nobel Prize for showing that humans tend to make irrational decisions. But that’s what Richard Thaler has done. In an interview from 2018, the founder of behavioral economics describes his unlikely route to success; his reputation for being lazy; and his efforts to fix the world — one nudge at a time.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 15, 2024

    596. Farewell to a Generational Talent

    596. Farewell to a Generational Talent

    Daniel Kahneman left his mark on academia (and the real world) in countless ways. A group of his friends and colleagues recently gathered in Chicago to reflect on this legacy — and we were there, with microphones.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Maya Bar-Hillel, professor emeritus of psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
      • Shane Frederick, professor of marketing at the Yale School of Management.
      • Thomas Gilovich, professor of psychology at Cornell University.
      • Matt Killingsworth, senior fellow at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Barbara Mellers, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eldar Shafir, director of the Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science & Public Policy at Princeton University.
      • Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 11, 2024

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    American politics is trapped in a duopoly, with two all-powerful parties colluding to stifle competition. We revisit a 2018 episode to explain how the political industry works, and talk to a reformer (and former presidential candidate) who is pushing for change.

     

    • SOURCES:

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 04, 2024

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    It’s hard to know whether the benefits of hiring a celebrity are worth the risk. We dig into one gruesome story of an endorsement gone wrong, and find a surprising result.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • John Cawley, professor of economics at Cornell University.
      • Elizabeth (Zab) Johnson, executive director and senior fellow with the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Alvin Roth, professor of economics at Stanford University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 27, 2024

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    Broadway operates on a winner-take-most business model. A runaway hit like Stereophonic — which just won five Tony Awards — will create a few big winners. But even the stars of the show will have to go elsewhere to make real money. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 20, 2024

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    The Berlin dance mecca Berghain is known for its eight-hour line and inscrutable door policy. PJ Vogt, host of the podcast Search Engine, joins us to crack the code. It has to do with Cold War rivalries, German tax law, and one very talented bouncer.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Lutz Leichsenring, executive board member of Clubcommission Berlin and co-founder of VibeLab.
      • PJ Vogt, reporter, writer, and host of the podcast Search Engine.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 17, 2024

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    Hit by Covid, runaway costs, and a zillion streams of competition, serious theater is in serious trouble. A new hit play called Stereophonic — the most Tony-nominated play in history — has something to say about that. We speak with the people who make it happen every night. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 13, 2024

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    Every December, a British man named Tom Whitwell publishes a list of 52 things he’s learned that year. These fascinating facts reveal the spectrum of human behavior, from fraud and hypocrisy to Whitwell’s steadfast belief in progress. Should we also believe?

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 06, 2024

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    An update of our 2020 series, in which we spoke with physicians, researchers, and addicts about the root causes of the crisis — and the tension between abstinence and harm reduction.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Gail D’Onofrio, professor and chair of emergency medicine at the Yale School of Medicine and chief of emergency services at Yale-New Haven Health.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Nicole O’Donnell, certified recovery specialist at the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy.
      • Jeanmarie Perrone, professor of emergency medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eileen Richardson, restaurant manager.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 03, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Science of whaling - 11.09.11 Naked Oceans

    Science of whaling - 11.09.11 Naked Oceans
    Is there such a thing as sustainable whale hunting? And even if there is, are we likely to see an end to the moratorium on commercial whaling. We find out in this first episode of a brand new series of Naked Oceans as we dive into the issues surrounding whaling. We pay a visit to the International Whaling Commission to find out the latest on whale research and management. And we venture into the past to the heyday of global whaling and discover how whaling ship logs from hundreds of years ago are offering vital insight into the changing climate. And Wallace J. Nichols launches our new series of Critter of the Month with a long distance migrant on a fascinating journey.

    TPP255: What would Rob and Rob do?

    TPP255: What would Rob and Rob do?

    We’ve been in the property game for quite some time now and almost on a daily basis, someone asks us “What would you do?”  This week - we’re going to tell you!

    From starting in a credit card hole to making the leap to become a full time landlord, these are the questions we get asked most often and this what we would do if we were in those situations ourselves.

    NEWS THIS WEEK

    Purplebricks could have 15% of the market by 2022 according the banks.  What is to become of the high street estate agent?  Are they destined to go the way of the travel agent?  We dig a little into the story to find out more.

    RESOURCE OF THE WEEK

    Save money on hotels even after booking.  That sounds pretty good, right?

    Our resource of the week - Pruvo can help you do just that!

    IF YOU ENJOYED THE PROPERTY PODCAST, PLEASE LEAVE A REVIEW ON ITUNES

    Reviews are really important in helping other people to find the show, so by way of thanks we read out every single review we receive on air.

    If you’d like to hear your name on the show, leave us a review on iTunes here.

    Not sure how to leave a review? This video shows you how to review and subscribe on iTunes.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    What are false positives?

    What are false positives?

    When getting a medical diagnosis, it's important to understand the terms. Negative is good, positive is bad, false positive is great in a way, but false negative is the worst. Learn all about false positives, when your tests indicate you have a disease of some kind when you don't, and what this means in the medical community at large.

    Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    SUFB 099: Whale Hunting Today Explained By Dr. Chris Parsons

    SUFB 099: Whale Hunting Today Explained By Dr. Chris Parsons
    We see news articles about specific countries hunting whales around the world and there doesn't seem to be a good reason for it. We also see the IWC not really doing much about it, so we ask the question: Why? Dr. Chris Parsons sits is a Marine Mammal Biologist who sits on the Scientific Committee of the IWC and breaks down the science, or lack there of, and the politics involved in the decisions. Support the Podcast: http://www.speakupforblue.com/patreon Shop for the Ocean: http://www.speakupforblue.com/shop 10 Ocean Tips to Conserve the Ocean: http://www.speakupforblue.com/wordpress/sufb_optinpdf Show Notes: http://www.speakupforblue.com/session99