The Cost of Discrimination on the Economy: Discrimination can have a damaging impact on society as a whole, as demonstrated by the removal of Jewish business executives in 1930s Germany. This research highlights the importance of diversity and highly qualified individuals in driving economic growth.
Kilian Huber, an economics professor at the University of Chicago, recently published a paper that explores the effects of discrimination on the broader economy and the impact of losing highly skilled individuals. He studied the removal of Jewish business executives in 1930s Germany, who held 15% of senior management positions despite comprising less than 1% of the population. The expulsion of these executives had a significant impact on the German economy, and studying this period is particularly relevant amidst the current global reckoning around discrimination. Huber's research emphasizes the crucial role that diverse, highly qualified individuals play in driving economic growth and underscores the damaging impact that discrimination can have on society as a whole.
The Economics of Discrimination: Impact and Solutions.: Discrimination can harm an economy by excluding minority groups. Education and literacy play a key role in success. Diversity policies can help but may have unintended consequences. Exploration is necessary for solutions.
Discrimination has a significant impact on the economy, with examples of minority groups being removed from the economy in various countries. Anti-Jewish sentiment throughout history has often stemmed from the success of Jewish individuals in business, science, and beyond. Education and literacy have been key factors in this success. Mandated diversity policies are one way to combat discrimination, but they can also have potential negative consequences. The economics of discrimination is a complex issue that requires continued exploration.
The Success and Persecution of Jewish Individuals throughout History: Despite facing discrimination and hostility, Jewish individuals have succeeded in various fields due to cultural and intellectual factors. However, the events of Nazi Germany serve as a tragic reminder of the dangers of discrimination and intolerance.
Jewish individuals have historically achieved great success in various fields, with possible explanations including a culture of Torah reading, a propensity for analytical reasoning, and a drive to justify their existence in a hostile environment. However, during the rise of Nazi Germany, even top executives of successful firms were targeted and expelled if they had Jewish ancestry or were considered religious Jews. This led to the untimely deaths of many, highlighting the dangers of discrimination and intolerance.
The Economic Impact of Anti-Semitic Discrimination in 1930s Germany: Discrimination based on religion can have severe economic consequences, affecting the performance of firms and businesses. History must be remembered and learned from to prevent similar events from occurring in the future.
The removal of Jewish business executives in 1930s Germany allowed economists to study the effects of discrimination on the economy and the importance of senior executives. Firms used legislation that forced Jews out of the public sector as a pretext to dismiss their Jewish employees, while others were enthusiastic about the Nazi movement. The study found that the removal of top executives had a negative impact on firms, highlighting the importance of human capital. Germans have a responsibility to understand what happened and work to prevent it from happening again. The availability of detailed records proved useful for this research.
The Negative Impact of Discrimination on Firms in Nazi Germany: Discrimination against certain groups of people, such as Jewish managers, can have long-lasting negative effects on the performance of businesses and the economy as a whole. It is important to recognize and address discrimination to promote growth and development.
Discrimination against Jewish managers in Nazi Germany had a long-lasting negative impact on the performance of affected firms, as shown by the decline in share prices, profits, and efficiency. The loss of top managers with valuable characteristics such as education, experience, and connections was hard to replace and persisted for at least 10 years after their expulsion. This harmed Germany's economic agenda and suggests that it could have done even better if it had not lost such valuable human capital. The effects of discrimination on businesses and economies can be long-lasting and damaging to growth and development.
The Economic Impact of Discrimination and the Importance of Eradication: Discrimination, whether it be taste-based or statistical, harms both the discriminated and the discriminators economically. Eradicating all forms of discrimination is crucial for a healthy and just economy and society.
Discrimination not only harms the discriminated but also the discriminators economically. Taste-based discrimination such as the Holocaust might harm the economy more in the long run as it forgoes all economic logic. Statistical discrimination, where an employer infers certain qualities about an individual based on their subgroup, is also damaging and should not be justified as rational discrimination. It is essential to eradicate all forms of discrimination, both for moral and legal reasons, to promote a healthy economy and society.
The Economic and Social Impact of Discrimination: Discrimination can take various forms and has lasting implications on individuals, businesses, and economies. It is important to examine the particulars to understand its effects, including its impact on marginalized groups.
Discrimination comes in various forms and has different economic and non-economic impacts. Kilian Huber's research on the expulsion of Jewish business executives in Nazi Germany showed how an abrupt reversal of the status quo led to a measurable economic impact. However, discrimination that prevents marginalized groups from assimilating into society and the economy can be more common. Joe Louis, a Black boxer, was an important athlete in Detroit and his story shows the impact of discrimination on individuals and communities. Silke-Maria Weineck's research, along with Stefan Szymanski, highlights the significance of sports in cultural studies. Discrimination has lasting implications on individuals, businesses, and economies, and it is important to examine the particulars to understand its effects.
The Intersection of Sports, Race, and Industry in Detroit's History: Detroit's auto industry and Henry Ford's $5-a-day wage brought diverse communities to the city and created opportunities for Black workers, including boxing legend Joe Louis, who became a symbol of unity and hope in tumultuous times.
In Detroit's history of sports, race and industry, especially the auto industry, have always collided. Henry Ford's $5-a-day promise to his workers brought people from Eastern Europe, Germany, and the American South, including Black workers who received equal pay as white workers. Joe Louis's family moved to Detroit due to Ford's wages, and Joe Louis worked briefly at the River Rouge plant before becoming the heavyweight champion of the world. His popularity stemmed from his success in the sport of boxing and his fights against Max Schmeling from Nazi Germany, which were seen as a democratic-pluralism-versus-fascism fight. Despite this, Joe Louis's exceptional talent in the ring was celebrated by people of all races, making him an icon and the most beloved athlete in American history.
Joe Louis' Struggle Against Systemic Racism in Entrepreneurship: Even successful and well-known individuals like Joe Louis faced discrimination in their entrepreneurial pursuits due to systemic racism in America's business landscape.
Joe Louis, the world heavyweight title holder for 10 years, wanted to open his own Ford dealership in Chicago after retiring from boxing. However, when the company's C.E.O received the inquiry, it was met with 32 memos from Ford dealers and district managers around the country, all of whom understood the question as, 'Should we let a Black man sell Fords?' As the responses proved, the idea of a Black man running a Ford dealership was heavily rejected, with statements like, 'The Ford business is a white man's business and we do not want any Negroes in it.' This history speaks to the reality of systemic racism in America's business landscape even for people as well-known and accomplished as Joe Louis.
Systematic Denial of Opportunities in the Automotive Industry: Discrimination based on race is harmful to both individuals and businesses. Removal of barriers in hiring and making amends for past injustices can drive economic growth. The call for reparations for Joe Louis is just.
Black individuals were systematically denied opportunities in various industries, including the automotive sector, due to racism and discrimination. Joe Louis, an accomplished Black athlete, was denied a Ford dealership solely because of his race. This discrimination resulted in Black buyers having no options but to purchase from white-owned dealerships. Although some dealerships hired Black salesmen, they were kept off the lot and were only allowed to deal with Black clients exclusively. Discrimination is bad for business and stifles economic growth. Economic theorists suggest that the removal of barriers in hiring women and Black individuals helped drive U.S. economic growth. It is never too late to make amends for past injustices. The call for Ford to consider naming a plant or building after Joe Louis as an act of belated reparations is both necessary and just.
The Benefits of Investing in Black-Owned Dealerships & Increasing Diversity in Hiring Practices: Companies can benefit economically from supporting diverse teams and implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. Discriminatory hiring practices are costly, and symbolic reparations cannot replace actual investment in minority-owned businesses.
Investing in Black-owned dealerships and increasing diversity in hiring practices can have positive economic benefits for firms. A study by economists at the Wharton School showed that balanced teams with diverse backgrounds performed better than homogeneous teams in a Harvard Business School entrepreneurship course. Additionally, discriminatory hiring practices can be costly for firms, highlighting the benefits of implementing diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. While symbolic acts of reparations can be important, they cannot substitute for actual reparations and investment in minority-owned businesses.
The Impact of Forced Diversity on Student Team Performance: Organically diverse student teams perform better than those that are forced to be diverse, and teams matched based on gender and ethnicity performed the best. Forced diversity can have negative effects on performance levels.
In a study of student team performance, it was found that diverse teams formed organically performed well, but those that were forced to be diverse had significantly lower performance levels. The study controlled for factors such as intelligence, talent, and connections, as well as demographics and educational background. The difference in performance levels between diverse and non-diverse teams was three to five times worse in the forced diversity groups, while the diverse teams that were not forced performed just fine. The study found that teams that were matched based on both gender and ethnicity performed the best. This highlights the importance of organic diversity and the potential negative effects of forced diversity.
The Challenges of Mandated Diversity Policies: Simply mandating diversity policies may not be enough to address inequality in the workplace. Instead, it's vital to understand and remove the root causes of gender and ethnic disparities through personal experiences and addressing occupational sorting.
Mandated diversity policies can have unintended negative consequences and may not address the root causes of inequality. Instead, efforts should be made to understand and remove the underlying causes of gender and ethnic disparities in the workplace. Personal experiences, such as those of women, can shed light on the challenges of achieving equality of opportunity. Occupational sorting may also contribute to the gender pay gap.
The importance of diversity in investment banking: Encouraging CEOs to step out of their comfort zones and prioritize diversity in hiring practices can lead to a thriving business environment. Forced diversity can be unsuccessful, but seeking understanding and empathy can promote progress.
Diversity is critical for business success, and having a different perspective can benefit investment banks, as evidenced by the positive outcomes seen when venture capitalists have more daughters. However, achieving diversity is challenging, as forced diversity can be unsuccessful and hard work is required to make progress. Instead, encouraging CEOs to spend time outside their comfort zones and gain an understanding of others' experiences could promote greater awareness and empathy. Although there is a limit to what can be required, prioritizing diversity in hiring practices and encouraging diverse perspectives can create a thriving business environment.
Importance of Good People and Learning from History in Economic Growth: Encouraging good people and promoting education on past events can lead to a better future and prevent discrimination. Kilian Huber, Silke-Maria Weineck, and Sophie Calder-Wang offer valuable research and insights on these issues.
The presence of good people is crucial for economic growth, and governments should aim to encourage good people to come up with good ideas. Germany takes the Nazi era and World War II extremely seriously and emphasizes their significance in their education system, which has helped shape modern German culture. It is important to continue to grapple with this history and learn from it, in order to prevent future discrimination of any kind. Kilian Huber, Silke-Maria Weineck, and Sophie Calder-Wang have contributed valuable research and insights into these topics.
480. How Much Does Discrimination Hurt the Economy?
Research shows that invoking diversity mandates does not necessarily address cost imposed by discrimination on both victims and perpetrators.
Freakonomics Radio
794 Episodes
Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio
609. What Does It Take to Run a Cannabis Farm?
Chris Weld worked for years in emergency rooms, then ditched that career and bought an old farm in Massachusetts. He set up a distillery and started making prize-winning spirits. When cannabis was legalized, he jumped into that too — and the first few years were lucrative. But now? It turns out that growing, processing, and selling weed is more complicated than it looks. He gave us the grand tour. (Part three of a four-part series.)
- SOURCES:
- Chris Bennett, operations manager at Berkshire Mountain Distillers.
- Luca Boldrini, head of cultivation at The Pass.
- Yasmin Hurd, director of the Addiction Institute at Mount Sinai.
- Chris Weld, founder and owner of Berkshire Mountain Distillers.
- RESOURCES:
- "As America’s Marijuana Use Grows, So Do the Harms," by Megan Twohey, Danielle Ivory, and Carson Kessler (The New York Times, 2024).
- "Evaluation of Dispensaries’ Cannabis Flowers for Accuracy of Labeling of Cannabinoids Content," by Mona M. Geweda, Chandrani G. Majumdar, Mahmoud A. ElSohly, et al. (Journal of Cannabis Research, 2024).
- "The Complicated, Risky — but Potentially Lucrative — Business of Selling Cannabis," by James R. Hagerty (The Wall Street Journal, 2023).
- "Marijuana Content Labels Can’t Be Trusted," by Shira Schoenberg (CommonWealth Beacon, 2022).
- "Growing Cannabis Indoors Produces a Lot of Greenhouse Gases — Just How Much Depends on Where It’s Grown," by Jason Quinn and Hailey Summers (The Conversation, 2021).
- "Blood and Urinary Metal Levels Among Exclusive Marijuana Users in NHANES (2005-2018)," by Katlyn E. McGraw, Anne E, Nigra, Tiffany R. Sanchez, et al. (Environmental Health Perspectives, 2018).
- "The Carbon Footprint of Indoor Cannabis Production," by Evan Mills (Energy Policy, 2012).
- EXTRAS:
- "Cannabis Is Booming, So Why Isn’t Anyone Getting Rich?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
- "Is America Switching From Booze to Weed?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
Abortion and Crime, Revisited (Update)
With abortion on the Nov. 5 ballot, we look back at Steve Levitt’s controversial research about an unintended consequence of Roe v. Wade.
- SOURCES:
- John Donohue, professor of law at Stanford Law School.
- Steve Levitt, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Chicago and host of People I (Mostly) Admire.
- Jessica Wolpaw Reyes, professor of economics at Amherst College.
- RESOURCES:
- “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime Over the Last Two Decades,” by John J. Donohue and Steven D. Levitt (The National Bureau of Economic Research, 2019).
- “The Demise of the Death Penalty in Connecticut,” by John J. Donohue (Stanford Law School Legal Aggregate, 2016).
- “Environmental Policy as Social Policy? The Impact of Childhood Lead Exposure on Crime,” by Jessica Wolpaw Reyes (The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 2007).
- “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime,” by John J. Donohue and Steven D. Levitt (The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001).
- “State Abortion Rates: The Impact of Policies, Providers, Politics, Demographics, and Economic Environment,” by Rebecca M. Blank, Christine C. George, and Rebecca A. London (The National Bureau of Economic Research, 1994).
- EXTRAS:
- "John Donohue: 'I’m Frequently Called a Treasonous Enemy of the Constitution,'" by People I (Mostly) Admire (2021).
608. Cannabis Is Booming, So Why Isn’t Anyone Getting Rich?
There are a lot of reasons, including heavy regulations, high taxes, and competition from illegal weed shops. Most operators are losing money and waiting for Washington to get out of the way. In the meantime, it’s not that easy being green. (Part two of a four-part series.)
- SOURCES:
- Jon Caulkins, professor of operations research and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University.
- Adam Goers, senior vice president of The Cannabist Company and chairperson of the Coalition for Cannabis Scheduling Reform.
- Precious Osagie-Erese, founder and C.E.O. of Precious Canna Co.
- Nikesh Patel, C.E.O. of Mammoth Distribution.
- Nikesh Patel, director of the San Francisco Office of Cannabis.
- Tom Standage, deputy editor of The Economist.
- RESOURCES:
- "Most Americans Favor Legalizing Marijuana for Medical, Recreational Use," (Pew Research Center, 2024).
- "Whitney Economics U.S. Legal Cannabis Forecast - 2024 - 2035," by Beau Whitney (Whitney Economics, 2024).
- "Beer Sellers Use a Loophole to Break Into Weed Drinks Market," by Redd Brown (Bloomberg, 2024).
- "Cannabis Producer Seeks Boston Beer Merger," by Lauren Thomas (The Wall Street Journal, 2024).
- "California's 'Apple Store of Weed' Declares Bankruptcy With $410M in Debt," by Lester Black (SFGate, 2024).
- "Is the State Democratic Chair Influencing Who Can Sell Legal Weed in this N.J. City?" by Jelani Gibson (NJ.com, 2023).
- "When Prohibition Works: Comparing Fireworks and Cannabis Regulations, Markets, and Harms," by Jonathan P. Caulkins and Kristina Vaia Reimer (International Journal of Drug Policy, 2023).
- "Did Minnesota Accidentally Legalize Weed?" by Paul Demko (Politico, 2022).
- EXTRAS:
- "Is America Switching From Booze to Weed?" by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
- "The Economics of Sports Gambling," by Freakonomics Radio (2019).
607. Is America Switching From Booze to Weed?
We have always been a nation of drinkers — but now there are more daily users of cannabis than alcohol. Considering alcohol’s harms, maybe that’s a good thing. But some people worry that the legalization of cannabis has outpaced the research. (Part one of a four-part series.)
- SOURCES:
- Jon Caulkins, professor of operations research and public policy at Carnegie Mellon University.
- Yasmin Hurd, director of the Addiction Institute at Mount Sinai.
- Michael Siegel, professor of public health and community medicine at Tufts University.
- Tom Standage, deputy editor of The Economist.
- Ryan Stoa, associate professor of law at Louisiana State University.
- RESOURCES:
- "Cannabis Tops Alcohol as Americans’ Daily Drug of Choice," by Christina Caron (The New York Times, 2024).
- "Deaths from Excessive Alcohol Use — United States, 2016–2021," by Marissa B. Esser, Adam Sherk, Yong Liu, and Timothy S. Naimi (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2024).
- "Nixon Started the War on Drugs. Privately, He Said Pot Was ‘Not Particularly Dangerous,'" by Ernesto Londoño (The New York Times, 2024).
- "A Brief Global History of the War on Cannabis," by Ryan Stoa (The MIT Press Reader, 2020).
- Craft Weed: Family Farming and the Future of the Marijuana Industry, by Ryan Stoa (2018).
- "How the Sugar Industry Shifted Blame to Fat," by Anahad O’Connor (The New York Times, 2016).
- "The Perils of Ignoring History: Big Tobacco Played Dirty and Millions Died. How Similar Is Big Food?" by Kelly D. Brownell and Kenneth E. Warner (The Milbank Quarterly, 2009).
- A History Of The World In Six Glasses, by Tom Standage (2005).
- "Cancer and Coronary Artery Disease Among Seventh-Day Adventists," by E. L. Wynder, F. R. Lemon, and I. J. Bross (Cancer, 1959).
- EXTRAS:
- "Why Is the Opioid Epidemic Still Raging?" series by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
- "Daron Acemoglu on Economics, Politics, and Power," by People I (Mostly) Admire (2024).
- "Let’s Be Blunt: Marijuana Is a Boon for Older Workers," by Freakonomics Radio (2021).
- "What’s More Dangerous: Marijuana or Alcohol?" by Freakonomics Radio (2014).
606. How to Predict the Presidency
Are betting markets more accurate than polls? What kind of chaos would a second Trump term bring? And is U.S. democracy really in danger, or just “sputtering on”? (Part two of a two-part series.)
- SOURCES:
- Eric Posner, professor of law at the University of Chicago Law School.
- Koleman Strumpf, professor of economics at Wake Forest University.
- RESOURCES:
- "A Trump Dictatorship Won’t Happen," by Eric Posner (Project Syndicate, 2023).
- The Demagogue's Playbook: The Battle for American Democracy from the Founders to Trump, by Eric Posner (2020).
- "The Long History of Political Betting Markets: An International Perspective," by Paul W. Rhode and Koleman Strumpf (The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Gambling, 2013).
- "Manipulating Political Stock Markets: A Field Experiment and a Century of Observational Data," by Paul W. Rhode and Koleman S. Strumpf (Working Paper, 2007).
- "Historical Presidential Betting Markets," by Paul W. Rhode and Koleman S. Strumpf (Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2004).
- EXTRAS:
- "Has the U.S. Presidency Become a Dictatorship? (Update)," by Freakonomics Radio (2024).
- “Does the President Matter as Much as You Think?” by Freakonomics Radio (2020).
- "How Much Does the President Really Matter?" by Freakonomics Radio (2010).
Has the U.S. Presidency Become a Dictatorship? (Update)
605. What Do People Do All Day?
EXTRA: Roland Fryer Refuses to Lie to Black America (Update)
604. Did the N.F.L. Solve Diversity Hiring? (Part 2)
603. Did the N.F.L. Solve Diversity Hiring? (Part 1)
Related Episodes
Diversity in Organisations
What makes a diverse workplace? An organisation aiming to celebrate diversity should reflect the demographic profile of the population. Professor Gavin Jack explores issues such as demographics, workplace and customer diversity, and discrimination and inequality.
Find out more about the online Masters of Business Administration at http://online.latrobe.edu.au
Copyright 2014 La Trobe University, all rights reserved. Contact for permissions.
Why You Should Consider The Gini Coefficient To Measure Inequality
I’m hoping that you use some kind of data to track Diversity & Inclusion where you work
Find out about a potentially controversial way for you to measure inequality where you work
Here are some key topics covered from this episode:
- A controversial idea to measure inequality
- An approach we can borrow from the World Bank
- Why people may disagree with this idea and much more
Play the episode for more
Here are some key takeaways from this episode:
Gini Coefficient measures inequality
“Would a high Gini coefficient point to a high concentration of these things with a small number of people?”
You can repurpose it to measure inequality where you work
“I don’t know if it’s creator would approve but what if we used the Gini coefficient for something useful where you work”
Not everyone’s going to agree with you
“Critics will say that they’re already collecting data, if so great, but I hope what you’re doing goes a lot further than the engagement surveys from HR”
Here are some resources so you can go deeper:
World Bank Inequality and Shared Prosperity
Gini addresses the Third International Congress of Eugenics
Check out these related episodes of the show.
The Relationship Between Conformity & Inequality At Work
When Corporate Diversity Targets Destroy Inclusion
Whenever you're ready, there are a few ways I can support your Inclusion Journey:
2. Get Practical Book Insights
For everything else check this
https://linktr.ee/elementofinclusion
- An approach we can borrow from the World Bank
- Why people may disagree with this idea and much more
The Vexing Notion of Merit
Cedric Dawkins, Chair of the Management Department at Quinlan joins the podcast to share his recent ponderings and investigation into our notions of merit and how they should be applied.
3: Women @ Work (1): Challenges Faced by Professional Women in the Workplace: Part 1
During this episode, I share my personal journey to understand, come to terms with, and finally stand by and up for women who face bias in the workplace. In 2020, professional women still struggle to be recognized and valued in the workplace. They silence their voices not because of weakness or fear, but because many highly successful professional women work in traditionally male-dominated contexts, where there is little actual interest in the challenges women face in the workplace when it comes to diversity and inclusion. The stories in this episode intend to give voice to some compelling and jaw-dropping stories about women facing real issues related to equity at work.