Logo
    Search

    411. Is $2 Trillion the Right Medicine for a Sick Economy?

    en-usApril 02, 2020

    Podcast Summary

    • Understanding the CARES Act: A Lifeline for Those Affected by the PandemicThe CARES Act provides unprecedented aid to individuals, small businesses, healthcare, and more amidst the economic and health crisis caused by COVID-19. While controversial, it remains a crucial relief package for those affected by the global pandemic.

      The CARES Act, at a cost of over $2 trillion, is an unprecedented treatment for the economic and health crisis brought about by COVID-19. The act includes aid to industries and big firms, small businesses, states, and cities, healthcare, and more. Most notably, a half-a-trillion dollars in direct aid to individuals, including added unemployment payments and direct cash payments for those who qualify. While some consider it a necessary measure to keep the economy simulating as normal, there are concerns over where the money comes from and the inclusion of tax loopholes and pork in the bill. However, in a time like this, the act remains a significant relief package for those affected by the global pandemic.

    • The Importance of Prioritizing Health and Stabilizing the Economy Amidst Covid-19The government's $2 trillion bill is a good start, but it is crucial to distribute funds quickly and effectively. Prioritizing health in the short term is necessary for long-term economic well-being. Efficient testing and resource distribution will help society better handle future crises.

      During the Covid-19 pandemic, efforts to stabilize the economy and care for individuals' health are of utmost importance. The $2 trillion bill passed quickly by the government has been commended by economists, such as Gary Cohn and Larry Summers, but the focus must be on ensuring the money is distributed quickly and effectively. Healthcare economist Katherine Baicker suggests that maximizing long-term economic well-being requires prioritizing health in the short term. While the pandemic has affected people from all walks of life, with doctors, nurses, and other professionals using their intellect and moxie to help out, society as a whole must also strive to become more competent in handling crises, with efficient testing and distribution of resources.

    • Implementing Legislation: The Challenges AheadPassing legislation is only the first step. The true measure of success is in its implementation to slow or contain the virus. Processing unemployment claims, distributing stimulus payments, and getting eligible help with minimal chaos is key.

      Passing legislation is just the beginning, implementing it is the hard part. The CARES Act was praised for its speed in response but criticized for not directly addressing the spread of the virus. Unemployment insurance was seen as both the best and worst feature, providing relief for many families but excluding those with individual tax identification numbers. While lawmakers may pat themselves on the back for passing a $2 trillion bill, the true test of saving the economy is in slowing or containing the virus. The road ahead will require processing unemployment claims, distributing stimulus payments, and getting eligible individuals the help they need while avoiding technical issues and chaos.

    • The Benefits and Limitations of the CARES Act for Income Support during the PandemicWhile wage replacement and job continuation are effective ways to provide income for Americans during the pandemic, direct individual checks may not be well-targeted and exclusion of vulnerable Americans from payments and unemployment insurance is a serious issue. Unemployment insurance targeting those most in need is an effective strategy to provide support.

      The wage replacement and job continuation parts of CARES act are the best features in providing income to Americans during the pandemic. However, the direct individual checks are the worst feature, as they are not well-targeted and not stimulative during a time when people should be staying home. The exclusion of vulnerable Americans from direct payments and unemployment insurance is a serious issue, leaving families in crisis and in need of help. Unemployment insurance on steroids, which targets those who have lost their jobs or can't work due to the pandemic, is an effective strategy in getting money into the hands of those who need it most.

    • Debate Continues on Payments to Individuals in Stimulus PackageWhile there are concerns about the effectiveness of providing payments to individuals in the stimulus package, senators are working towards formulating effective relief measures that could lead to a potential overhaul of the social security system.

      The debate around the effectiveness of payments to individuals as part of the stimulus package continues. While some argue that it is not calibrated to whether someone has lost their job or not and may not be quickly distributed, others believe that the relief is needed for those who are most in need, such as retirees. The concern is whether individuals will spend the money quickly on non-essential items and later have no funds to support local businesses once they reopen. The stimulus package has been criticized for introducing a form of universal basic income, but it could potentially lead to a more significant overhaul of the social security system in the US. Senators are working together to push for relief measures that will benefit those impacted by the pandemic.

    • Disagreements and Objectives Behind the CARES ActDemocrats pushed for controls on aid and cash payments while some Republicans objected due to unemployment insurance being viewed as too generous. The main aim was to provide relief to Americans and to stimulate the economy during a difficult time.

      The CARES act passed with unanimous support, but there were disagreements along the way. Democrats pushed for stronger controls on aid to corporations and industries, while both parties supported direct payments to individuals. Senator Booker, who lives in a low-income community, argues that cash payments are necessary to help families struggling to make ends meet during a crisis. He also believes that most workers will show up for work despite receiving essentially full wages, as Americans have shown resilience during past crises. Some Republicans objected to the bill because they believed unemployment insurance was too generous. Overall, the CARES act aimed to provide relief to Americans and stimulate the economy during a difficult time.

    • Opinions on Unemployment and Corporate Bailouts During COVID-19The COVID-19 crisis has sparked debate about how to handle unemployment and corporate bailouts. It's important to balance the need for supporting people in need with accountability and fairness to both individuals and corporations.

      During the COVID-19 crisis, there are differing opinions on how best to handle unemployment and corporate bailouts. While some are concerned that unemployment benefits may discourage people from returning to work, others believe it's necessary to support those in need during an emergency. Additionally, there are debates about the allocation of funds to corporations versus individuals and other institutions like hospitals. Senator Booker notes that while corporations need more transparency and accountability, it's important to remember that there are people working for these businesses who need support and stability. Larry Summers argues that if a bailout is necessary for companies like Boeing or airlines, taxpayers should see a significant return on investment. Ultimately, the goal is to keep vital industries afloat while ensuring accountability and fairness to all parties involved.

    • The Cost of Supporting Small Businesses During the PandemicWhile the CARES Act provides a mechanism for small businesses to get guaranteed loans that will be forgiven if they don't lay off workers, the estimated cost to replace revenue for three months may be much higher than allocated funds. Effective communication is key to success.

      The CARES Act set aside more than $350 billion to support small- and mid-sized businesses, but the estimate is off according to Glenn Hubbard, a prominent economist and former advisor to the Bush administration. His calculations showed that replacing most revenue for firms in the service sector with 500 or fewer employees for three months could cost close to a trillion dollars, much more than what is allocated in the CARES Act. However, he believes that the mechanism is a good one, where small-business people can borrow a guaranteed loan through banks and the loan will be forgiven if they don't lay off their workers. Hubbard thinks that banks are very good at this and that effective communication between the administration, small-business people, and banks is key to making this support work.

    • Can the Federal Government's Small-Business Rescue Plan Save the Day?The Small-Business Rescue Plan aims to help small businesses survive the pandemic by providing funding for rent and employee wages. Its success depends on efficient cooperation, and concerns include obtaining loans and using funds effectively.

      The small-business rescue plan introduced by the Federal Government is an experiment aimed at helping small businesses to survive the economic impact of the pandemic. The plan involves making funds available to small businesses so they can pay rent and keep their employees. However, many banks are not equipped to deal with this process, which could make obtaining these funds difficult. Some experts are optimistic about the chances of the rescue plan working, but others are less certain. Concerns include the ability of small businesses to obtain loans and whether they will use the funds effectively. The key takeaway is that the small-business rescue plan is a welcome initiative, but its success will depend on the cooperation and efficiency of those involved.

    • Examining the Pros and Cons of the $2 Trillion Relief PackageThe relief package is necessary to limit the economic impact of the pandemic. However, it includes unnecessary pork-barrel spending and bailouts to big businesses, which could undermine its political legitimacy. Ensuring the aid reaches those in need will be crucial.

      The US government's $2 trillion relief package is a necessary move to limit the economic impact of the pandemic. If the economy manages to recover quickly, there may be less criticism over the pork-barrel spending in the bill. However, both Democrats and Republicans have added their fair share of unnecessary spending, turning the relief bill into a 'Christmas tree' laden with tinsel and ornaments. The large bailouts to big businesses, further corporate tax cuts, and tax loopholes for real-estate tycoons are particularly concerning as they could undermine the political legitimacy of the relief measures. The challenge now will be to ensure that the aid gets into the right hands and the economic relief measures are effective.

    • The $2 Trillion Injection into the US Economy: Short-Term Solution, Long-Term UncertaintyInjecting $2 trillion into the economy may be a good idea in the short-term, but the long-term implications remain unknown. This one-time expenditure will likely lead to higher taxes and lower spending in the future.

      Despite the agreement across political parties that injecting $2 trillion into the economy is a good idea in the short-term, the long-term implications of the borrowing remain unclear. Experts agree that this is a one-time expenditure that must be paid for in the future, which will likely lead to a combination of higher taxes and lower spending. However, given that the U.S. has the ability to borrow at low-interest rates, it is a godsend in the current situation. Ultimately, the U.S. can carry this debt for a very long time due to its one-time nature, but the idea that we will eventually need to raise revenues to balance the budget cannot be ignored.

    • The Importance of Borrowing Money During Crises and Future Debt Management.Borrowing money during crises is necessary, but eventually debts need to be paid off by raising revenues and doing a reevaluation of spending and revenue. Economic relief should remain focused on economics to protect society and the economy.

      During times of crisis, such as times of war or pandemics, borrowing money to protect and rebuild society is necessary. However, eventually, there needs to be a period where we live more within our means and pay down the debt. This can be achieved through raising revenues and doing a once-in-a-lifetime reevaluation of both spending and revenue. Congress may need to borrow even more money in the short-term, but it is important to keep economic relief focused on economics. The CARES act included important healthcare changes to ensure that there are no financial barriers to getting tested and receiving treatment and that telehealth visits are exempted from patient cost-sharing. Ultimately, it is crucial to protect both society and the economy and work to get our fiscal house in order.

    • The Need for Direct Aid to States and Cities during a CrisisProviding direct aid to state and local governments allows for quick responses to on-ground issues, and federal government support is crucial to ensure fiscal obligations are met, especially during short-term cash squeezes and declining tax revenues.

      The CARES act didn't provide enough direct aid to states and cities, which are often the first responders in times of crisis. Providing funds to state and local governments allows for nimble responses to problems on the ground. Additionally, states have their own fiscal obligations and require federal government support, as they face short-term cash squeezes and declining tax revenues while their expenses go up. The federal government is in a position to help fix this by borrowing and providing support for critical public-health infrastructure and Medicaid programs. The economic damage caused by the pandemic is not just limited to industries that have shut down, but also to the changes it will bring to our cultural landscape.

    • The Pandemic's Impact on Society and Foreseeable ChangesThe pandemic has brought about significant changes in various aspects of our lives. It has accelerated the shift to digital retail, remote work, and highlighted the need for paid leave and access to healthcare.

      The COVID-19 pandemic has brought about a multitude of changes, including the possibility of superbugs and the need for paid family and sick leave. The shift towards digital retail may signal the end of brick-and-mortar stores, leaving low-income workers in need of retraining. Social gatherings such as sporting events and air travel may forever be changed due to the pandemic. The shift towards remote work may also lead to a decrease in office space use, as well as a rise in online banking. While concerns about domestic violence and divorce rates have been raised, some believe that the pandemic may lead to a blissful reconnection of families. This crisis has also highlighted the importance of everyone having access to lifesaving healthcare.

    • Access to Healthcare and its ImpactAccess to healthcare affects individuals and their communities, and the current crisis highlights the need for rethinking healthcare financing. A good, vigorous debate is needed on the safety net, student loans system, and dealing with inequality. Despite challenges, resilience and community spirit offer reasons for optimism.

      Access to healthcare and its impact vary depending on the type of health issue. Contagious diseases highlight the interconnectedness of one person’s access to healthcare on the health of the whole community. However, when it comes to non-contagious health issues, the person who benefits the most from access to care is the person who gets it. The current healthcare crisis demonstrates the need for a re-think on how healthcare is financed, particularly for those who are losing their jobs and health insurance. It is not advisable to make permanent policy decisions during a crisis; instead, we need a good, vigorous debate on the right safety net, student loans system, and dealing with inequality. Despite the current situation, there are reasons for optimism, including the resilience of the economy and the strong community spirit emerging during the pandemic.

    • ......

      The current pandemic has highlighted the importance of preparedness and realistic conversations about the future and health of the country. While it has caused a demand-driven recession, it does not have to fundamentally destroy the economy. Getting control of the virus through measures such as vaccines, treatments, testing, and innovation can allow us to move forward and remember this time as a wacky unexpected event. It is important for leaders in Congress, Senate, and the executive branch to engage in these conversations, and for citizens to vote in new leaders if necessary. The pandemic has shown us the importance of being ready for unexpected challenges and taking realistic measures to address them.

    Recent Episodes from Freakonomics Radio

    597. Why Do Your Eyeglasses Cost $1,000?

    597. Why Do Your Eyeglasses Cost $1,000?

    A single company, EssilorLuxottica, owns so much of the eyewear industry that it’s hard to escape their gravitational pull — or their “obscene” markups. Should regulators do something? Can Warby Parker steal market share? And how did Ray-Bans become a luxury brand? (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Neil Blumenthal, co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker.
      • Dave Gilboa, co-founder and co-CEO of Warby Parker.
      • Jessica Glasscock, fashion historian and lecturer at the Parsons School of Design.
      • Neil Handley, curator of the British Optical Association Museum at the College of Optometrists.
      • Ryan McDevitt, professor of economics at Duke University.
      • Cédric Rossi, equity research analyst at Bryan Garnier.
      • Tim Wu, professor of law, science and technology at Columbia Law School.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 18, 2024

    EXTRA: People Aren’t Dumb. The World Is Hard. (Update)

    EXTRA: People Aren’t Dumb. The World Is Hard. (Update)

    You wouldn’t think you could win a Nobel Prize for showing that humans tend to make irrational decisions. But that’s what Richard Thaler has done. In an interview from 2018, the founder of behavioral economics describes his unlikely route to success; his reputation for being lazy; and his efforts to fix the world — one nudge at a time.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 15, 2024

    596. Farewell to a Generational Talent

    596. Farewell to a Generational Talent

    Daniel Kahneman left his mark on academia (and the real world) in countless ways. A group of his friends and colleagues recently gathered in Chicago to reflect on this legacy — and we were there, with microphones.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Maya Bar-Hillel, professor emeritus of psychology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
      • Shane Frederick, professor of marketing at the Yale School of Management.
      • Thomas Gilovich, professor of psychology at Cornell University.
      • Matt Killingsworth, senior fellow at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Barbara Mellers, professor of psychology at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eldar Shafir, director of the Kahneman-Treisman Center for Behavioral Science & Public Policy at Princeton University.
      • Richard Thaler, professor of behavioral science and economics at the University of Chicago.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 11, 2024

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    595. Why Don't We Have Better Candidates for President?

    American politics is trapped in a duopoly, with two all-powerful parties colluding to stifle competition. We revisit a 2018 episode to explain how the political industry works, and talk to a reformer (and former presidential candidate) who is pushing for change.

     

    • SOURCES:

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJuly 04, 2024

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    594. Your Brand’s Spokesperson Just Got Arrested — Now What?

    It’s hard to know whether the benefits of hiring a celebrity are worth the risk. We dig into one gruesome story of an endorsement gone wrong, and find a surprising result.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • John Cawley, professor of economics at Cornell University.
      • Elizabeth (Zab) Johnson, executive director and senior fellow with the Wharton Neuroscience Initiative at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Alvin Roth, professor of economics at Stanford University.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 27, 2024

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    593. You Can Make a Killing, but Not a Living

    Broadway operates on a winner-take-most business model. A runaway hit like Stereophonic — which just won five Tony Awards — will create a few big winners. But even the stars of the show will have to go elsewhere to make real money. (Part two of a two-part series.)

     

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 20, 2024

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    EXTRA: The Fascinatingly Mundane Secrets of the World’s Most Exclusive Nightclub

    The Berlin dance mecca Berghain is known for its eight-hour line and inscrutable door policy. PJ Vogt, host of the podcast Search Engine, joins us to crack the code. It has to do with Cold War rivalries, German tax law, and one very talented bouncer.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Lutz Leichsenring, executive board member of Clubcommission Berlin and co-founder of VibeLab.
      • PJ Vogt, reporter, writer, and host of the podcast Search Engine.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 17, 2024

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    592. How to Make the Coolest Show on Broadway

    Hit by Covid, runaway costs, and a zillion streams of competition, serious theater is in serious trouble. A new hit play called Stereophonic — the most Tony-nominated play in history — has something to say about that. We speak with the people who make it happen every night. (Part one of a two-part series.)

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 13, 2024

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    591. Signs of Progress, One Year at a Time

    Every December, a British man named Tom Whitwell publishes a list of 52 things he’s learned that year. These fascinating facts reveal the spectrum of human behavior, from fraud and hypocrisy to Whitwell’s steadfast belief in progress. Should we also believe?

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 06, 2024

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    EXTRA: The Opioid Tragedy — How We Got Here

    An update of our 2020 series, in which we spoke with physicians, researchers, and addicts about the root causes of the crisis — and the tension between abstinence and harm reduction.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Gail D’Onofrio, professor and chair of emergency medicine at the Yale School of Medicine and chief of emergency services at Yale-New Haven Health.
      • Keith Humphreys, professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at Stanford University.
      • Stephen Loyd, chief medical officer of Cedar Recovery and chair of the Tennessee Opioid Abatement Council.
      • Nicole O’Donnell, certified recovery specialist at the University of Pennsylvania's Center for Addiction Medicine and Policy.
      • Jeanmarie Perrone, professor of emergency medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Eileen Richardson, restaurant manager.

     

     

    Freakonomics Radio
    en-usJune 03, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Special Episode: Crisis in India - Managing a Healthcare Operation During COVID

    Special Episode: Crisis in India - Managing a Healthcare Operation During COVID

    Hear the story of Dr. Shuchin Bajaj, a doctor, and entrepreneur who set out to provide affordable, quality health care in rural India and found himself on the front lines of the pandemic through his network of 15 hospitals. From encountering multiple supply chain disruptions to motivating his team and building a 1,000-bed, no-cost, Covid treatment center in a matter of weeks, Dr. Bajaj has moved mountains to save lives. Leaders across India and in emerging markets globally will find his reflections valuable, both now, and when/if they find themselves at the center of a second or third wave.  


    Resources:


    Volunteer for Project StepOne: https://projectstepone.org/join-us/

    Donate to Project StepOne: https://projectstepone.org/donate/#

    Stanford Center for Innovation in Global Health: https://globalhealth.stanford.edu/covid-19/resources-for-the-covid-19-crisis-in-india.html/

    Stanford Seed: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/seed

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    China's Covid gamble

    China's Covid gamble

    A month after the Chinese government announced an abrupt end to its “zero-Covid” policy, lifting virtually all the restrictions its citizens had been living under for three years, the country is now experiencing a huge wave of infections. With Chinese New Year approaching, can the country’s already stretched health system cope? And what will the coming weeks hold for the Chinese people?

    This podcast was brought to you thanks to the support of readers of The Times and The Sunday Times. Subscribe today: thetimes.co.uk/storiesofourtimes.

    Guest: Didi Tang, Beijing Correspondent, The Times.

    Host: Manveen Rana.

    Clips: BBC News, Global National, CBS News, 9 News Australia, CNA, Reuters, NBC News.





    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Davis Butler, BUTLER | MERSEREAU

    Davis Butler, BUTLER | MERSEREAU
    Frazier & Deeter's Business Beat: Davis Butler, BUTLER | MERSEREAU Davis Butler, Managing Partner at BUTLER | MESEREAU, joined Roger Lusby to chat about the work his firm does for small businesses and other organizations. Davis discussed his work in healthcare, specifically physician practices, the changing healthcare industry landscape, and advice for practices preparing for […] The post Davis Butler, BUTLER | MERSEREAU appeared first on Business RadioX ®.

    189: How to Create a Paper Records Management System for Expanding Small Businesses

    189: How to Create a Paper Records Management System for Expanding Small Businesses

    In the last episode of our Business Infrastructure audio masterclass, you heard the story of twin co-founders, Karen and Sharen Benoit. They’ve been given a second chance to pass an audit of their mental health clinic’s records. Their consultant friend comes to the rescue by teaching them how to design a compliant Paper Records Management system that consolidates, organizes, stores, and protects their physical files.

    *

    You might be wondering, “Why are we talking about organizing paperwork in the digital age?” Some industries are heavily regulated and require the maintenance of physical files for certain periods. Paper Records Management is the fourth element in building business infrastructure. Think of it as the paper-based version of your Digital Records Management system. 

    *

    Now you can experience the satisfaction of decluttering and organizing your company’s paper records! In this episode, host Alicia Butler Pierre offers a 10-step tutorial. The result is an audit-ready paper management system that standardizes best practices for recordkeeping.

     

    🔗 Links to Resources: https://www.eqbsystems.com/podcast/189-how-to-create-a-paper-records-management-system-for-expanding-small-businesses  

    ❓ Send your questions to Alicia on Twitter or LinkedIn.

    🎧 Like What You Heard? Don’t Keep it to Yourself. Subscribe and Share!

    And don’t forget to leave a review! ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐

    242: Business Infrastructure Masterclass | How to Create a Paper Records Management System for Expanding Small Businesses

    242: Business Infrastructure Masterclass | How to Create a Paper Records Management System for Expanding Small Businesses

    In the last episode of our Business Infrastructure audio masterclass, you heard the story of twin co-founders, Karen and Sharen Benoit. They’ve been given a second chance to pass an audit of their mental health clinic’s records. Their consultant friend comes to the rescue by teaching them how to design a compliant Paper Records Management system that consolidates, organizes, stores, and protects their physical files.

    You might be wondering, “Why are we talking about organizing paperwork in the digital age?” Some industries are heavily regulated and require the maintenance of physical files for certain periods. Paper Records Management is the fourth element in building business infrastructure. Think of it as the paper-based version of your Digital Records Management system.

    Now you can experience the satisfaction of decluttering and organizing your company’s paper records! In this encore feature, host Alicia Butler Pierre offers a 10-step tutorial. The result is an audit-ready paper management system that standardizes best practices for recordkeeping.

     

    🔗 Links to Resources: https://www.eqbsystems.com/podcast/242-business-infrastructure-masterclass-how-to-create-a-paper-records-management-system-for-expanding-small-businesses   

    Send your questions to Alicia on Twitter or LinkedIn.

    🎧 Like What You Heard? Don’t Keep it to Yourself. Subscribe and Share!

    And don’t forget to leave a review!