1/28/25: Warhawks Doubt Tulsi Spying Flip Flip, Trump Demands California Voter ID For Aid, AOC Rips Biden To Jon Stewart, Bill Gates Furious With Elon
en
January 28, 2025
TLDR: Krystal and Saagar discuss Tulsi Gabbard's inconsistency on spying accusations, Trump's call for voter ID for California relief, AOC criticizing Biden, and Bill Gates criticizing Elon Musk's political spending.

Air Date: January 28, 2025
Hosts: Krystal and Saagar
In this episode, Krystal and Saagar dive deep into the latest political developments, touching on issues from Tulsi Gabbard's controversial nomination to Donald Trump's demands for voter ID related to disaster relief in California. They explore the broader implications of these events for the American political landscape.
Key Discussion Points
1. Tulsi Gabbard's Confirmation Struggles
- Gabbard's Complicated Position: Tulsi Gabbard is facing scrutiny as she testifies for her nomination as the Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Both Republicans and Democrats exhibit skepticism regarding her commitment to privacy rights, specifically her past positions on the FISA Act.
- Opposition from National Security Figures: Former CIA Director John Brennan publicly criticizes Gabbard, highlighting the importance of trust in national security positions. Her perceived flip-flopping on surveillance issues presents a significant challenge for her confirmation.
2. Trump's Controversial Demands for Voter ID
- Tying Aid to Political Conditions: Trump proposes that federal disaster relief for California's wildfire recovery be contingent upon the state implementing stricter voter ID laws. This approach is seen as an effort to penalize California's Democratic leadership while catering to conservative constituents.
- Political Implications: The hosts examine how such demands could hinder disaster response efforts and indicate a trend of politicizing federal aid, raising ethical concerns regarding emergency responses tied to political agendas.
3. AOC's Critique of Biden and the Democratic Party
- AOC's Vocal Stance: During a recent interview with Jon Stewart, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) criticized President Biden's lack of decisive leadership and highlighted rampant hypocrisy regarding insider trading among Congress members.
- Call for Accountability: AOC emphasizes the need for Democrats to align their policies with the party's rhetoric on oligarchy and accountability. Her comments reflect a growing frustration within the party's base regarding perceived inaction and inconsistencies.
4. Bill Gates and Elon Musk's Political Influence
- Gates on Musk: Bill Gates expresses concerns about Elon Musk's political contributions and influence, framing the discussion around the risks of wealthy individuals destabilizing democracies.
- Contradictions in Gates' Stance: The hosts argue that Gates' own substantial political contributions undermine his concerns about outside influence, illustrating a broader issue of accountability among billionaires in politics.
Practical Takeaways
- Understanding Political Dynamics: The discussions throughout the podcast highlight the increasingly interconnected nature of political maneuvering, emergency management, and the influence of media narratives.
- Voter Sentiment: Listeners are reminded of the importance of fostering transparent political discourse, particularly regarding the role of influential figures in shaping policy.
Conclusion
Krystal and Saagar continue to dissect the implications of these current events, emphasizing the necessity for credibility and accountability within both political parties. With ongoing tensions and complexities in American politics, the need for informed citizen engagement remains paramount.
Was this summary helpful?
Experiencing the news each day can feel like a journey. With Up First from NPR, though, it doesn't have to be. Welcome to 15 easy minutes of breaking news, clarity on international and national affairs, and a casual tone that you can take in with breakfast. Begin your day informed, ready, and refreshed. Begin your day with Up First. Subscribe to Up First from NPR on the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, it's Alec Baldwin. This past season on my podcast, Here's the Thing. I spoke with more actors, musicians, policymakers, and so many other fascinating people, like writer and actor Dan Aykroyd. I love writing more than anything. You're left alone, you know, you do three hours in the morning, you write three hours in the afternoon, go pick up a kid from school, then write at night, and after nine hours, you come out with seven pages, and then you're moving on.
Listen to Here's the Thing on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to My Legacy. I'm Martin Luther King III, and together with my wife, Andrea Waters King and our dear friends, Mark and Craig Kilburger, we explore the personal journeys that shape extraordinary lives.
Join us for heartfelt conversations with remarkable guests like David Oyeloho, Mel Robbins, Martin Sheen, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and Billy Porter. Listen to my legacy on the iHeartRadio app. Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is my legacy.
Hey guys, Sagar and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of the show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox.
We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at breakingpoints.com. All right, let's get to confirmation. And let's go put this up there on the screen. This is a huge week for confirmation for some of Trump's nominees. Today, this morning, actually, after the show is finished recording, RFK Jr. will take and testify to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee for his confirmation
hearing. He's actually will appear first before finance, which is one of the two committees with jurisdiction and then again on Thursday. So they'll have multiple opportunities to question him. Then you will have Kelly Loeffler, who will be at the Small Business Administration. I forgot that. Yeah, before SB. I forgot that too.
the failed candidate. She had some kind of like insider trading situation. I don't know if it was insane. She just had a sketchy background. She worked as the CEO of a crypto platform before she became the senator from Georgia. And then she lost famously in that Senate runoff and has been hanging around Mar-a-Lago for since then to try and get something. She was accused of selling $20 million in stock a week after a coronavirus pandemic briefing.
That's right. I remember that. Yeah. Because it wasn't just her. There was also Richard Blanket on the name. Senator from North Carolina. Burr. Burr. There you go. Senator Richard Burr. He's the one who remember he had his phone seized. That's right. And all of that. There was David Perdue, also the former senator from Georgia, CEO of Dollar General. I think he's going to be our ambassador to China. There you go.
All right, Thursday, we will have Cash Patel from the FBI. He will testify before the Judiciary Committee. And then also on Thursday, this is really the big one, which is Tulsi Gabbard, who will testify before the Senate Intelligence Committee for her confirmation as the DNI.
Right now, the biggest question marks are around R.F.K. Jr. and around Tulsi Gabbard. Gabbard in particular has faced a huge opposition from a lot of very pro-surveillance state, both Democrats and Republicans, and there's still faces of really, I think, tougher path to confirmation. Taste of what that looks like. John Brennan, the former CIA Director, campaigning against her on MSNBC. Let's take a listen.
Well, when there are National Security Council meetings that the President chairs in the White House Situation Room, usually the first person to speak would be the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of CIA. They lay down the intelligence basis for any type of policy discussion that ensues. And so if that intelligence basis, that briefing is going to be skewed or is going to be lacking some very important critical information, the policy decision that ultimately comes out of it is also going to be
right, baseless, and also, you know, it's going to be potentially threatening to our national security. So, again, it's the President's Daily Brief, but also the role that the Director of National Intelligence, Director of CIA Play, in order to ensure that the people who have to make those decisions in the National Security Council have are fully informed
about what the reality is, what the intelligences, what our intelligence gaps are, and if they withhold things or if they skew things, it really is going to be detrimental. Real quick before we let you go, Director, do those agency heads have in that moment you're describing in that room, have that realization that, wait a minute, that's not what we told you. I mean, in other words, how does that coordination become undone?
when the person who's putting the final brief is skewed the information. Well, I like to think that Secretary of State Rubio is very familiar with the intelligence profession. It's going to be speaking up because you have the Secretary of State, Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, others who are going to be there. So you want to make sure, again, that you have people who are informed, but also people who want to know the truth. And not just people who want to give President Trump what he wants to hear.
That is so, so dangerous.
I think you said this. You can say a lot about her flips on a lot of issues. That was the one I think we were all agreed. We're, you know, we're skeptical. It's pretty consistent. Yeah, I thought we were pretty skeptical of these things. I think they're bad, but the view from Washington is clear. If you want to get confirmed, this is it. And you know what's really crazy is this. Put this on the screen. The current Republican swing boat, Susan Collins, is unconvinced that she's actually flipped. So her position is that her, Tulsi's flip,
on 702 and Fiza Authority seems insincere to her and she just can't in good conscience, perhaps, support somebody who, you know, has even in the past voiced a concern about Section 702 and Fiza spying. I should note, by the way, because you floated this as well.
RFK Jr. is also a sleeper problem, potentially, in terms of his confirmation. While he's got a lot of MAGA votes, the fact that McConnell came out and voted against Pete Hegstaff, that was a big deal, right? Because that shows pretty clearly he's been dropping hints like nobody's business that he doesn't like.
Tulsi Gabbard. If Lisa Murkowski and Susan Collins was already unconvinced, it would take JD. And then there's just one more Republican, let's say both on Tulsi Gabbard and our RFK junior, if they defect, then they're not going to get confirmation. So those are some pretty big questions. I would rather be a RFK junior right now.
than I would Tulsi Gabbard, just because I think that the FISA element is so difficult. I mean, correct me if I'm wrong, I think it's possible that a Democrat, or sorry, at least the very least Democrats for Tulsi, it's an absolute non-starter. Many of them would not even vote or meet with her because they think she's a traitor for being a former Democrat. R.K. Jr. maybe has a better chance.
Of all of that, I still, you know, really remains to be seen. But those two really do seem to be the ones who could be in trouble. I do think they'll probably still get confirmed just because of the pressure the Trump administration has been willing to bring to bear. But if they do get confirmed, it's very likely to be which aid advances the tie break vote.
With RFK, I could see some Democrats crossing over. I was thinking the same. I could see John Federman voting for him, whereas I cannot see John Federman voting for Tulsi Gower because he's such a little psycho. But what about Bernie? No, Bernie could vote for RFK, if he extracts some promises. I don't think so. I mean, maybe. But I think there would be a lot of concern about his views on vaccines. The other one that I think could crossover is what's his name from Colorado, Bennett? Yeah.
had made like maybe Colorado has a kind of like crunchy RFK junior-ish faction that's fairly fairly significant which their governor remember in the beginning Jared Polis was like oh I kind of like this guy I wish he was still in our coalition so I could see that I mean even Cory Booker has made some like sort of RFK junior-ish
directional moves, et cetera. So you could maybe if you lose someone like, for example, there's concern about the fact that RFK Jr. from the Republican side, there's concern that he is pro-choice. Now, like Tulsi, who was like, oh, section 702, I totally, I'm good there. Like, everything is cool. RFK Jr. has also tried to reassure.
that he is going to support pro-life positions from his post here. But it's possible someone is really concerned about that and he could lose a vote. But I think probably both of them end up getting through, but we'll see. I just have to say,
I wouldn't personally vote for either one of those, probably the one Trump nominee that I would personally vote for is the labor secretary, not because I think that she would be so great, but because I think she's the best you would get out of a Republican administration. And Republicans always oppose nominees.
They always stand up to Trump on the worst possible issues. So there is a lot of upset over the Labor Secretary pick. Let's put this. We have this last tear sheet that we can put up on the screen here, guys, from media. Rand Paul, but he's not the only one, says he's going to vote against Trump's Labor Secretary because she's very pro-labor.
God forbid you have a labor secretary that's pro labor. Now, her record with regard to labor issues is actually not good. The only thing she supported the pro act and voted for the pro act, which was the big push in the Biden administration to make labor organizing a lot easier.
She ends up being the pick of the team she's had who put Sean O'Brien who pushes for her to be in there. So like I said, I think she's the best that you get out of a Republican administration. But she is now apparently in doubt because so many Republicans are so oppositional towards any sort of actual support for labor and labor organizing. Again, I think she'll get through because
You can have some Republican defections because I suspect there are a number of Democrats who will cross over to vote for her here. But like I said, I just feel like they the places where Republicans resist Trump are like always on like the worst in the worst direction. Like this is an hawkish and
enough, she doesn't want to spy on Americans enough. You're going to need Democrats to vote for her if she's going to get through. I also do think it's an important part of the Trump coalition. I mean, Sean O'Brien took a ton of shit for not doing an endorsement, and he was at the inaugural ball, for example, and he's been on, what was he, on Theo Vaughn, remember that? Like, if anybody who knows what time it is, it really is Sean O'Brien. And he has played it well. That was one of the benefits that he got.
out of the Trump administration by not endorsing that was one of the big political things that he had, but this is part of the problem with the current Republican coalition. So it's a question mark two for the Democrats, whether they're going to come through and actually do this. In terms of also the Maha agenda, this is another one, which there's a fundamental tension at the heart of Maha. Some of Maha is not in tension with the GOP at all. Some of Maha is very libertarian, which I'm fine with. Things like
transparency, more studies, you know, we're going to make sure that with the vaccine studies or whatever, we're going to publish it for everybody and increase informed consent. I'm like, okay, sure. We're going to increase parental choice. Okay. I think that's good. We're going to increase it. But it comes in detention with industry and also with the government power when you talk about banning certain things.
Yes. And that's part of the problem is that we don't live in a libertarian paradise. The government has power. We have regulatory authority. Their policy shapes our food. And so, for example, one of the things RFK Jr. has talked about is he's like, we don't need ozempic for children. All kids need is three healthy meals per day. And I think the government should provide them. I'm like, okay, listen, I'm fine with that.
as we all know from, you know, Rand Paul and all those other people who are you saying the government is going to tell people what to eat? You know, it's like, oh, are we? The government program is going to be going out there and designing food for children. The horror of that. I mean, remember how people reacted to Michelle Obama and the whole let's move thing. That is very intention, right? Whereas what's easier, cut a check to a drug company, which that's very in the line of the American tradition.
Well, there have already been a couple of major betrayals of the quote, unquote, maha movement. For one thing, a seed oil lobbyist is going to be chief of staff at USDA. Yeah, that's right. Thomas Massey pointed this out. Yep. For another thing, I don't know if you if you noticed this, but exactly. Trump rolled back. So the Biden administration actually moved forward to to ban these. They're called forever chemicals, which are linked to the answer to ban them. It's a huge problem because there's been massive runoff. It's in so many of our waterways and the water we drink, et cetera.
And so he had actually signed an executive order to limit these forever chemicals, which very much is up in the right direction. Trump rolled that back. So it's already pretty clear those tensions, as you put it, and which side this Republican party is ultimately gonna fall on. And also, there was no backlash against any of these moves to speak of.
So I think Trump feels very much like he can sort of, you know, by having RFK Jr. in there, he feels like he's satisfying the demands of that coalition without actually following through on policy pieces that they would theoretically want in place. And then number one, Trump doesn't have to run again. Number two, people typically on the, you know, in that coalition just kind of fall in line and are like, oh, well, if he's doing its fine or don't pay attention to the details or whatever.
So, I don't think he expects any backlash over this. And another one just on the labor front, I just saw this this morning. So, one of the good things that the Biden administration actually did was the general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Jennifer Russo. She didn't get as much attention as Alina Khan, but she was in some ways just as impactful and influential in terms of
pushing for the ability for workers to organize in labor unions. The National Labor Relations Board under Biden was really quite good. They made a number of decisions which are really important for Starbucks working, being able to organize for Amazon drivers.
to potentially be able to unionize and be treated as employees versus subcontractors. These are really important directions. Well, Abruzzo has been officially fired and no surprise, but very indicative of a more regressive, less pro-labor direction.
And just this morning, I see the news that Trump has ousted a National Labor Relations Board member, Gwen Wilcox, despite law forbidding firing board members absent, neglect, or malfeasance. This is according to the Labor Reporter for Bloomberg News.
So again, taking control of the National Labor Relations Board and moving it much back in the, you know, pro-business anti-labor direction of the first Trump administration. So, you know, I think very similar to like with R.F.K. Jr., where he feels like he can put in Sean O'Brien's pick as labor secretary,
and feel like he threw a bone to that coalition. But underneath the surface here, and in a lot of ways, the National Labor Relations Board is where the game is really played in terms of labor organizing. And all indications are that that is moving very much back to the standard Republican conservative anti-labor position.
And of course, the presence of Elon Musk cannot be understated there as well. Elon and Trump were delighting in Elon's firing striking workers. He is in legal battles to deem the National Labor Relations Board unconstitutional. He is against labor unions, period end of story. So it seems like that's the direction that they are moving in here.
Yeah, look, big tensions in this who will win or not. That's literally the open question. I am curious to see if Democrats, because this is a big question mark for Democrats too, in terms of what they decide, what fights they decide they will pick.
If they decide to pick Eddie, so far, the answer is no. Well, they voted against almost all the Trump nominees, right? So the only Trump nominee to get any unanimous consent was Marco Rubio. Which is so talented. Yeah, because in terms of collegiality and all that. But look, they all voted against Pete Haggsath. I think most voted against Kirsty Noem. They had like 29 no votes.
against her. There were most voted against Scott Bessent. So now it's like the question mark about labor. It's like, well, okay, like, what are we doing here? Exactly. Is it going to be all opposition? Because we all know who could easily get a 53 Republican vote? Oh, some heritage foundation.
right to work, you know, take some AG, what's the most right to work state in the country? Alabama, right? Probably take like the Alabama AG, put him up, it'd be easy. Well, last time. The biggest check mark in the country. At the beginning, that guy's name was like Puzster. Puzster, Andy Puzster. Yeah, it was like the head of Hardys of Arby's? Yeah, it was, is it Hardys or, it has another name? I forget. Carl's Jr. Yeah, but I think it's two different names, one international, one national. Terrible food, but.
Yeah, but anyway, it was him and he's like, obviously virulently anti-laborer, et cetera. So yeah, I mean, like I said, I think she's the best you're gonna get out of a Republican administration, but it doesn't mean that you're gonna get like actually good labor policy. Well, we'll see.
I'm so sick of hearing men talk about women's basketball. If only there were a professional WNBA player with her own podcast, I could listen to. Hey, this is Lixie Brown, WNBA player and professional yapper. And this is Mariah Rose. You may know me from spilling the tea on hoops for hotties on TikTok. And we've got a new podcast full circle. Every Wednesday, we're catching you up on what's going on in women's basketball and not just in the WNBA, but with athletes unlimited, unrivaled and college basketball.
We've got you with analysis, inside stories, and a little bit of tea. I know you guys have seen a lot of former and current basketball players telling their stories from their point of view, and I just think it's time for the girlies to tap in. We want to share all of the women's basketball stories that you won't see anywhere else. Tune in a full circle in I Heart Women's Sports Production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.
You can find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast.
Welcome to My Legacy. I'm Martin Luther King III, and together with my wife, Andrea Waters King, and our dear friends, Mark and Craig Kilburger, we explore the personal journeys that shape extraordinary lives. Each week, we'll sit down with inspiring figures like David Oyello, Mel Robbins, Martin Sheen, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and Billy Porter, and their plus one, their ride or die, as they share stories never heard before about their remarkable journey.
Listen to my legacy on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is my legacy.
Hosted by Bobby Bones, the official Yellowstone podcast takes you deeper into the franchise that's captivated millions worldwide. Explore untold behind-the-scenes stories, exclusive cast interviews, and in-depth discussions about the themes and legacy of Yellowstone. You know, the first guns to settle this valley fight was all they knew.
Whether you're a longtime fan or new to the ranch. Welcome to the Yellowstone. Bobby Bones has everything you need to stay connected to the Yellowstone phenomenon. I look forward to it. Listen to the official Yellowstone podcast now on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's go to work.
Why don't we get to wildfires? Lots of news there. Yes, indeed. So there has been an ongoing push to tie federal aid to for, you know, recovery from these horrific wildfires in LA to like forcing them to bend basically to Republican political priorities. Trump floated this in when he visited LA. I'll get to that in a minute. But Mike Johnson, speaker Mike Johnson, obviously very sort of pivotal in terms of this direction.
also saying that he agrees with the specifics of what Trump wants to tie this disaster funding to. Let's take a listen to that.
Yeah, we've got to work out the details of that. I haven't not spoken to the president about that issue since he said that. He'll be here tonight, of course, for dinner with us, and that's one of the topics of discussion. Listen, there are a lot of issues going on in California, and we have been lamenting the lack of voter security there for some time, election security.
We were deeply concerned about it in this last election cycle and we saw three of our seats frankly slip away from us in the weeks that it took to continue counting ballots in California when seemingly every other state and nation in America can get it done. It's inexcusable. Gavin Newsom provides, I think, such a lack of leadership there in so many ways and it was highlighted by the disaster with the fires. It's so heartbreaking that
California citizens are suffering because of lack of state and local leadership on those issues. They did not manage the forest well. They did not manage the water well. And everyone knew for decades that the eventuality that we've seen over the last couple of weeks here since that the fire disasters began was foreseeable. They assumed the risk because of their crazy
far left policy. So we've talked about conditioning the aid that will go there to policy changes. I think that is a common sense notion that is supported by the vast majority of the American people who do not want to subsidize crazy California leftist policies that are dangerous for people.
This is, of course, echoing some of what Trump said when he was on the ground, also bringing up specifically voter ID. So not even anything to do with fire management, but just pretty directly tied to, like, we don't like the way you vote. You hear Mike Donson there say, like, oh, three of our Republicans slipped away. We lost these three races. We're upset about it. Pretty wild to just directly tie it to political outcomes that they're unhappy with in the state. Here is Trump when he was on the ground singing a similar tune.
I want to see two things in Los Angeles, voter ID so that the people have a chance to vote. And I want to see the water be released and come down into Los Angeles and throughout the state. Those are the two things. After that, I will be the greatest president that California has ever seen. I want the water to come down.
and come down to Los Angeles and also go out to all the farmland that's barren and dry. You know, they have land that they say is the equivalent of the land in Iowa, which is about as good as there is anywhere on earth. The problem is it's artificial because they artificially stop the water from going onto the land.
So I want two things. I want voter ID for the people of California and they all want it. Right now you don't have voter ID. People want to have voter identification. You want to have proof of citizenship. Ideally you have one day voting, but I just want voter ID as a start.
voter ideas to start and just a minor crash that was actually when he was on the ground in North Carolina later in the day I believe he went to LA. I got one more clip from Trump saying that he is sort of floating the idea of getting rid of FEMA altogether the federal emergency management agency and leaving federal, leaving disaster aid solely up to the states which is, you know, I mean no state in the country is equipped to be able to handle
the disaster relief on the scale of what we're talking about when you're dealing with these repeated climate crises. Let's take a listen to what Trump had to say about that.
North Carolina gets hit, the governor takes care of it. When Florida gets hit, the governor takes care of it, meaning the state takes care of it. To have a group of people come in from an area that don't even know where they're going in order to solve immediately a problem is something that never worked for me. But this is probably one of the best examples of it not working. And there's been some others like in Louisiana, et cetera.
So we're going to be doing something on FEMA that I think most people agree. I'd like to see the states take care of disasters. Let the state take care of the tornadoes and the hurricanes and all of the other things that happen. And I think you're going to find it a lot less expensive. You'll do it for less than half. And you're going to get a lot quicker response.
This actually ties in Zogar with the executive order that we were talking about. Actually, not an executive order, but an agency directive, I guess it was, that is being parsed and debated right now. Calendar points will cover in full tomorrow. But basically says that all agencies need to stop distributing all federal funds to any programs outside of those that go directly to individuals.
So, potentially included in that would be things like disaster relief. So, you know, sort of ties in with these comments from Trump. And just one more note, you know, I know we're all thinking about California after these horrific fires.
But because you have so many red states along the coastline of the Gulf of America, I guess we'll say. Yes, the Gulf of America, that's right. That are tremendously impacted routinely by hurricanes. The bulk of FEMA money distributed goes to red states. So it would be red states that would be primarily affected. Not that that should matter because I happen to believe that whether you vote for Republicans or Democrats,
You should benefit from the federal government coming in to help you in your time of need, and I'm pretty sure that's something that most people in the country tend to accept. I mean, I've gone on the record, I think, for this. I think voter ID is a good policy or whatever. If Congress wants to pass a law that requires it for the entire nation, fine, I would have no
issue with that, but I don't think that FEMA money or any of that should be tied to it. I also think that it's stupid. Every single time we have a major disaster, Congress has to come through and pass some special supplemental as opposed to just actual checks that just kick in. Again, philosophically.
California is the biggest economy in our state. Federal revenue-wise, they probably pay more than any other state into the coffers. Alabama, which I don't like talking this way, but it is true, most of these states, Alabama, Mississippi, or whatever, are down early mobile and are almost certainly more beneficiaries of recipient tax dollars than they are paying in the system.
It would be genuinely outrageous. I would say this about Texas too, which is also a G15 economy in and of itself. If there's a Biden administration and they're like, oh, you need to implement ESG. I'd be like, okay, yeah, we'll just take our oil and go somewhere else, same with California. So I feel the same way in terms of neutrality for overall disaster relief. We've got 30 million Americans. I think who lived it, it might be more.
30-something million, one-tenth or so of the entire U.S. population lives in the state. I think we should just give- Many of them Republicans, by the way. Yes, many of them. Yes, they vote for Democrats. We shouldn't even have to talk this way. It's not about Republican Democrats. They're citizens. Many of them, again, tax-wise, have paid more than anybody else into the federal coffers. So when they need to be bailed out, I think we should bail them out. And in general, tying this political stuff to disaster aid is really bad policy, because it's like we just said, you could easily foresee some future Democratic president who said,
There's a issue in Texas. They're like, okay, well, you have to pursue green energy. And they're like, okay, well, we don't want to. So what are they supposed to do? You know, it's a bad policy to set up. Yeah. Well, in the voter ID thing, it's particularly crazy because, I mean, I would find it objectionable to put any conditions on it, even if it was like you have to do the water management in the way that we want. But at least that would relate. Yeah, that's right. In theory. Okay, look to fire management, you know. The water thing, if it's real, I don't know nearly enough.
about. Water, I've tried to read about it. That's way too political the way that it is. But if theoretically that was genuinely what caused it, okay, I could live with it. But the voter thing and anything generally political, again, if we want national voter ID, fine, pass it through.
and act of Congress. I'm totally fine with that. But conditioning aid to each state specifically to compel behavior is very different. For example, the thing that set the drinking age at 21, they're like, oh, if you want your highway dollars, then you have to do that. I mean, I don't even love that, per se. But at least that's one that applies to all states. Singling out an individual state, it seems wrong.
very clearly being like, we don't like how you voted, so you're not going to get our help. It's crazy. I mean, I mentioned this before, but one of the things that really radicalized me against Democrats when I lived in Kentucky, which, you know, had turned into the right and just elected Republican governor, and they were passing all kinds of legislation through that we, you know, getting rid of, like,
implementing, quote unquote, right-to-work versus anti-labour and attacking finishes, whatever, I got a lot on Twitter of like, we'll screw those people, they voted the wrong way. And I just think that once you start thinking that way, it's really, it's like the end of the country. It's like, it's over. Like, we may as well just break up and dissolve if it's just gonna be, you know, retribution against states and counties and cities that don't vote the way that you want them to. It's a very bad direction to go in.
There were some additional sort of underlying pieces here that have come out after the fires that have really caused additional pain and suffering for people there and helped to explain why, for example, the fire department in LA County, among other reasons, why they were under-resourced at this point. And we could put this up on the screen. This was actually from Ben Norton tweeted it out, but this was from Matt Stoller's substack. He had a guest
author on who I believe is a antitrust attorney, something like that, who wrote a long piece about the fact that U.S. firetrucks, their costs have skyrocketed because a private equity firm bought up the manufacturers and made a monopoly and put the piece up on the screen. And I'll give you some of the details here. So the cost of firetrucks
has skyrocketed going from 300 to 500,000 for a pumper truck and 750 to 900,000 for a ladder truck. Just in the mid 2010s, we're not talking about like the 80s or 90s, we're talking about the mid 2010s a decade ago. Now, they've skyrocketed to around a million for a pumper truck and two million for a ladder truck and not to mention the time to even get some, if you can afford that and you're willing to shell out the cash,
the time to actually take delivery receipt of that truck has gone to now being between two and four and a half years used to be less than a year. And the TLDR here, again, I recommend you read the piece because it's very instructive, not just about firetrucks, but about so many problems within our economy, is that a private equity firm called American Industrial Partners decided to
roll up the fire truck industry forced prices up across the board, consolidated all these previously like regional sort of like small manufacturing manufacturers. Originally, they had all this propaganda about, oh, we're gonna continue to allow you to operate in your facilities and you're gonna have your own brand and we'll just be like the parent company and you guys are gonna do your own thing. But they've long since dropped that act. They've significantly reduced capacity, like factory capacity in order to actually
build and deliver these trucks, spike the prices, and now you have an industry that is just tremendously consolidated, very little competition, very little choice. So when these fires struck, over half of the LA Fire Department's trucks were currently out of service.
And part of that is because of this price, they weren't able to replace the trucks. And then even things like being able to get the parts from these same manufacturers gets wildly more expensive. You add on top of that, they had seen budget cuts that we talked about before. And you end up with a situation where even as the fire risk has obviously dramatically increased in this era of climate crisis, they are significantly under-resourced and unable to even marshal the equipment.
necessary to be able to combat the fires that they would. It was really interesting actually to look at that. There's also been this price gouging that we should mention. Put it up there, please, on the screen. One of the things that we immediately flagged here at breaking points, but the rent has now risen by some 20% across LA counties after the fires, even though that's actually in direct violation.
of a legal limit of 10%, which is meant to be a anti-price gouging maneuver that kicks in in terms of disaster. But the real issue is that the housing stock has now obviously massively shrunk in some of the richest areas. There are huge question marks about insurance, property tax, the ability to even rebuild.
And then whether a lot of those people even want to rebuild. I mean, as I said, if something like that happened to me, I'm done. I'm not, you know, I'm not paying all that much income and property tax just to be screwed whenever it actually matters, whether it's private equity, whether it's lack of investment or whatever. We can all agree that it was completely incompetent the way that it was run. And so put that together and you're just seeing a real crisis of what I would say is like capital L liberalism.
These cities, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, and others, have relied on this weird balance of progressivism through rhetoric, but nimbism and rich people that come together. And LA is now the best example of, this is one of the greatest places in the entire world. No one can dispute that, weather-wise. It's incredible. And that you have the dynamic effect of the city, you've got land, you've got sun, you've got all this stuff happening.
But the fact is is that if anything, its resources are a curse that enables all of this bullshit to like surround it. And what we see here now is there's huge question marks as to whether they're even going to change their housing policy. Now, I'm not some universal yimby person. I'm actually skeptical of a lot of this. Like, we need all need to live in a box, five-minute city, stuff, et cetera. But California and New York are the places where I'm like, guys, this is undeniable.
this clearly is not working. When you have millions and millions and millions of dollars, and the average salary is like 100 grand with 13% income tax rates. Like, how does this shit even work? So I think they need to ask big questions. And if we're gonna tie federal aid, I would like it to be tied to something like this and be like, yeah, let's make sure that normal people can actually live here, you know? Instead of just either bailing out the ultra rich or just accelerating, was this accelerating building pathways for the richest residents who lost their homes.
as opposed to lowering the price for everybody. Look at what has happened in Austin. This is where a red state is genuinely beneficial. They don't have all this yimby bullshit. Rent in Austin is down 23% over the last three years. That's incredible. And it's literally just because they built a shit ton of housing everywhere. Houston, not the most beautiful city. It's cheap to live. If you want to live there, you know? Listen, you know, it's one of the only places that has made me want to maybe have some zoning laws, because it's like,
Should an auto body shop be next to a single family house? I don't know, but that house is pretty cheap and the people there seem to like it. It's one of the biggest cities in the country. That's my been my main takeaway from this LA situation.
Welcome to My Legacy. I'm Martin Luther King III, and together with my wife, Andrea Waters King, and our dear friends, Mark and Craig Kilburger, we explore the personal journeys that shape extraordinary lives. Each week, we'll sit down with inspiring figures like David Oyello, Mel Robbins, Martin Sheen, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and Billy Porter, and their plus one, their ride or die, as they share stories never heard before about their remarkable journey.
Listen to my legacy on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcast or wherever you get your podcasts. This is my legacy.
I'm so sick of hearing men talk about women's basketball. If only there were a professional WNBA player with her own podcast, I could listen to. Hey, this is Lixie Brown, WNBA player and professional yapper. And this is Mariah Rose. You may know me from spilling the tea on hoops for hotties on TikTok. And we've got a new podcast full circle. Every Wednesday, we're catching you up on what's going on in women's basketball and not just in the WNBA, but with athletes unlimited, unrivaled and college basketball.
We've got you with analysis, inside stories, and a little bit of tea. I know you guys have seen a lot of former and current basketball players telling their stories from their point of view, and I just think it's time for the girlies to tap in. We want to share all of the women's basketball stories that you won't see anywhere else. Tune in a full circle in iHeartWomen's Sports Production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment.
You can find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Presented by Capital One, founding partner of iHeartWomen's Sports. Everyone's forgotten who runs this valley. Time to remind them. Yellowstone fans, step into the Yellowstone universe. I found me like a serious dispatch. When I'm protected with my life.
Hosted by Bobby Bones, the official Yellowstone podcast takes you deeper into the franchise that's captivated millions worldwide. Explore untold behind-the-scenes stories, exclusive cast interviews, and in-depth discussions about the themes and legacy of Yellowstone. You know, the first guns to settle this valley fighting was all they knew.
Whether you're a longtime fan or new to the ranch. Welcome to the Yellowstone. Bobby Bones has everything you need to stay connected to the Yellowstone phenomenon. I look forward to it. Listen to the official Yellowstone podcast now on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Let's move on to some interesting comments from AOC, who has become one of the more vocal members of Congress on the Democratic side. I mean, I was just saying, Sagar, like, the Democrats apparently just got their act around to do like some press conference condemning the pardoning of January 6 rioters. And we're like, I mean, we're 10 other outrageous moves later.
I don't know. They're a mess. They don't understand the landscape. They don't know what to do. They're totally pathetic in terms of any sort of a fight this time around. I've seen a lot of just like normy Democratic base type people who are loyal, vote blue no matter who. MSNBC types who are furious with the way that the Democratic Party has reacted or their lack of response.
to Trump 2.0 this time around. So in any case, AOC is one of the people who has asserted herself more. John Stewart had her on, and she made some interesting comments about insider training, but also some interesting comments about Joe Biden on his way out of office being like, oh, there's a problem with oligarchy. Really? Is there? Tell me more about that. Let's take a listen to what she had to say. There need to be Democrats who walk the walk and talk the talk. There is an insane amount of hypocrisy.
And the hypocrisy is what gets exploited to use the cynicism. And wherever there's a hypocritical window, for example, I think one of the most biggest examples of this is insider trading in Congress. Like, dude, I don't know about like, do I give snaps? Do I, I don't know what the kids do anymore? But like, dude,
It's- Yes. It is like- Well, that's so crazy. It's so crazy. It's crazy. It's crazy. Yeah, crazy. I mean, like, that's the end of the thing. It's like, like, people think that everyday people are stupid. I'm like, do you really think that people don't see this shit? Like- They sit on a committee. They get information about a drug or a contract or a thing. They immediately make a call. The stockbroker changes things. And- and
their portfolio swells. It explodes. What are we doing? And you're doing this on public trust. Right. On on like taxpayer finance, public, you know, facilities like it. Of course. You're regulating the market that you're trading on.
Exactly. You run the casino. And then we're supposed to act like money doesn't only corrupts Republicans. Give me a fucking break Biden on his way out. It was only on his way out that he was like, this country is controlled by oligarchs by like, we couldn't use that energy a couple years ago.
Um, accurate on all of that. Isn't this a little too late, though? Well, I was all this Biden talk. It's like you endorse Biden, okay? Not only that. Not defended by it. Yeah. She, she, she, Bernie actually, um, they were in the like, you know, we're, we're all in with Biden here to, they were more with Biden than like Nancy Pelosi. So that's where part of it is just like shut up. All right. Well, here's, here's the part to, I think one of the, there's a few points she makes that I think are, uh, important.
Number one, about the way that hypocrisy is used against Democrats and understandably so. I mean, she's talking about the insider trading piece. Also talking about, you know, you had a lot of people, including Joe Biden, who were like Trump's a fascist, and then were like, welcome to the white, welcome home, Donald Trump.
People are not going to believe you. Next time you raise the alarm about something, if you are not acting like this was really bad that he got elected and I still think the things that I said before were true and this is a real threat.
Democrats, the way that they by and large, responded, which is to be like, yeah, we'll see and maybe we'll work with them, whatever. It's like, this is a wildly different energy than you were bringing up until five seconds ago. So even though, your point about her and Biden is a correct one and it's like, okay, well, where was that energy critiquing him previously? She is right in what she's saying here about the democratic response this time around to Trump.
Yeah, absolutely. And that's why when you think about, when you're thinking about how this is all shaping up, I think it all comes to credibility and say whatever you want about Trump. And he's switched his tune on many, many, but he's like core thing about immigration and trade.
Shit's been saying since 1976. You know, he's got a consistency of message. And even when he's inconsistent, it's within his, like, Trumpian, MAGA-like framework. As you always point out, what do things people like about Bernie Sanders? Basically been saying the same stuff since he's been running for office.
was a Burlington mayor. The problem I have here with the AOCs and all of that is you both try to be consistent on these. Let's be clear, she actually has been. She co-sponsored that legislation with Matt Gaetz on stock trading, so I'm not calling her out on whatever on this specifically.
But she's a capital D Democrat and that works for her sometimes. But it didn't, you know, when you have that inability to call out your own side when it's happening in the midst of the big existential question of the time, do we support Biden or do we ditch Biden? I don't know if a lot of people can have a lot of trust with you on this issue. So trust is everything.
in politics. I mean, why did Kamala at the end of the day lose? You know, her whole border hockstick, people were like, I don't believe you. Because of all this crap that you said in 2019, I think that you either still are open borders or maybe worse, you don't believe anything. And that's not- That's not a version that vibes with Trump, who has been
100% consistent, at least on illegal immigration. And that's mostly the valence of where people decided to fall with. So with AOC, with a lot of these progressive Democrats, it's like, I think Biden was like poisoned for them because they both had to defend him. But even in the times when they knew that he was being bad, they had to stay silent, they lost a lot of trust. And so it's like, it's easy to say when you're out of power. And by the way, of course, there's applies to Republicans too, right? This is the eternal problem of the insider, outsider dynamics.
Yeah, I don't know. I see, you know, sure we're about to play Charlemagne is like, people should be more like AOC and like, should they really? Like, I don't think that she's been a very successful politician over the last time. I would say she's actually one of the most failed politicians in the last 10 years. I mean, here's what went wrong for her.
She came in as a true outsider, true outsider, takes out Joe Crowley, who was, you know, in leadership and close to Pelosi and all these people and just sort of took a seat for granted. And she comes in and she knocks him out. And it's an earthquake, right? She decides before she's even, I think before she's sworn in, she's going to protest outside of Nancy Pelosi's office.
and make the statement. And there were two different pathways, right? One was to maintain that outsider status and really be that bomb through and leverage the social media following that she had and continues to have, by the way, and use that grassroots power against the established Democratic Party power. She step by step by step chose the other path, which was to try to
play the inside game. And we just really saw an example of how that was a completely failed tactic. I mean, she wanted to be ranking member on oversight. And she pledged reportedly as part of that. Like, if you let me do this, I am not going to primary any Democratic incumbents.
which is an extraordinary, extraordinary concession to basically say, like, I'm going to lay down my arms against any critique I have against any of y'all in the Democratic caucus. And they still blocked her and put in Jerry Connolly, who is literally
suffering with cancer and is aged. It's, and nobody's idea of a firebrand, right? Nobody's idea of a firebrand for a position that actually made sense for AOC because oversight, you know, it's all about like getting that clip that goes viral and sharing on social media, whatever. It really was a good position for her within the context of the Democratic Party, even in that she's blocked. So I think you're right, Sagar, that ultimately the test will come like,
Now it's kind of comfortable to have these critiques of what Joe Biden has done. He's out. It's all easy to see in retrospect the way this all went sideways, et cetera, et cetera.
Are you going to have that energy when it's difficult, when it goes against where the party is and what they're doing? Because that's when it really counts. We could have used that voice back when the Democrats were like, we're just not going to have a primary. Forget about the Biden-coma thing because I think
You could justify that when it turns out that Kamala actually on economics was going to be worse than Biden, like with regard to antitrust, SEC, crypto, possibly labor was not going to be as good as Biden. You could justify it from an ideological perspective, even though Biden obviously is too old, blah, blah, blah. But the real moment was back when Democrats said, we're going to cancel the primary. We're not going to have any debates. We're not going to have any choice.
that there was none of that energy from anyone at that point so uh... i i think that is that the quiet she if she wants to and i think she does if she wants to be a a actual leader
of a reformed, different democratic party. She's going to have to say things like this when it is difficult, when it is uncomfortable, when it requires her to bump up against her friends and colleagues in this institution.
We tease the Charlemagne clip, so let me go ahead and play it. But he's been interesting also in the aftermath. I mean, he's very frustrated with the Democratic Party for a whole variety of reasons. But it was interesting to hear him pick up on AOC at least having some fight in her. Let's take a listen to what he had to say.
And don't get me wrong, you should be angry at people suddenly making nights with Donald Trump. But instead of snooping Nelly, what about the Democratic politicians who spent four years calling Trump the new aide-off Hitler and then started doing stuff like this?
President Biden welcoming his successor to the White House observed all the traditional niceties. Joe Biden greeting Donald Trump at the White House with two words. Welcome home. There were smiles, there were handshakes. I mean, there was a real respect between the two. This moment between former President Barack Obama and President-elect Donald Trump has gone viral. They chuckled like old buddies. Trump even made Obama laugh.
I'm sorry, if you tell us someone is Hitler, you at least have to act like he's Hitler. I know when Barack got home, Michelle was like, he, he, hell. So Hitler got jokes, huh? In fact, here's the energy I wanted to see more of on Monday. All these journalists are like, Congresswoman, are you going to the inauguration? Congresswoman, are you going to the inauguration? Are you going to the inauguration? Let me make myself clear.
I don't celebrate rapists. So no, I'm not going to the inauguration tomorrow. See? Yes. That's right. That's right. That right there. That's backbone. That's principles. Man, I'm gonna miss AOC when she's deported to Nicaragua.
Now, whether or not you particularly agree with that critique saga, think about the difference though between Joe Amiga, who spent all this time and made lots of money and got super famous, saying comparing Trump to fascists and, yes, Nazis.
And then immediately he's elected and they're like, oh, we're going to make nice. And we're going to go down to Mar-a-Lago, blah, blah, blah, versus, listen, she's been consistent on this. And she is acting the way you would act if you actually believe the things that you said.
That's the piece of this that I think is important, is Democrats have by and large decided that the thing to do in this moment is just to sort of be quiet and see what happens and in certain respects capitulate to him, et cetera. Thinking that I will gain them credibility with the country, but I think that's the completely wrong calculus because we all remember the things you said and you need to act consistent with those threats that you laid out and you claim to believe
So I think Charlemagne is correct about that. I don't think that they really do, I don't think that they really do like believe it. I think they only believed one thing, that this resistance and to the extent of all the rhetoric and everything, it was always fake. It was always just about getting elected. They didn't believe in healthcare. They didn't believe in whatever, right? Almost all of it was just to get themselves either elected to win some midterms,
to keep control of power and then eventually around Biden, it was like to worship this cult of personality. And so really what's been revealed is they don't believe anything. Really what I think that they did believe is that Trump was democratically illegitimate. That was really it. Like that was their core belief that they could sell to the country. The reason why they're so in shambles is that obviously that's just no longer a case than you can advance. So now what? And like that's
I mean, look, it's exciting, I think, if you're a Democrat, because you're like, well, everything's up for grabs. You have the lowest party ID in a national century. You have so many different ways that you could think about who we are and what's next. But it's also, yeah, like you said, if I was one of those MSNBC people, these are normal folks, and I don't begrudge them. They're our fellow citizens.
Yeah, a lot of them did believe it. And so it's humiliating for them in some ways to look at this and to see what it really is. And I would tell you guys, you guys got taken for a ride. They never believed any of this stuff. I think they know that. I hope, I hope you all. I think they do. I mean, that's why, like you do see, I mean, first of all, I know some of you see it there.
It's almost like you can't even pick on them at this point because it's so pathetic, right? But yeah, I think they have lost total credibility. And I think liberals have really had their trust in those institutions. The Washington Post, The Times, and MSNBC and whatever has been shattered.
I think their trust in the mainstream Democratic Party that they, you know, we're talking about like really hardcore normy Dems has been dramatically shaken. And, you know, I think that they're waiting for someone to have some energy and some fight left in them. And I do think, like,
I, these battles are going to play out in the next Democratic primary. And I don't think that the Democratic base is going to, I'm going to skip the stock because we've just, we've gone on a long time here, but, you know, there was a reporter who was like, maybe John Funderman's what the Democratic party means. Like, that is not going to be the direction the base wants to go in.
of now being like, oh, I'm going to go and have a meeting with Trump, and I'm going to back his priority with the Lake and Riley Act, and I'm going to basically sound like a Republican on any manner of things. That is not what the base is going to want. So while, you know, I think the most likely direction is that the next Democratic nominee is someone like a Gavin Newsom, some very standard, you know, cut from the normal Democratic cloth, there is more of an opening now than there was previously because of the way that the trust in those
liberal institutions has been broken, and Democrats are really going to have, like, whose side are you on moment. Because the way that you have to combat the, you know, the Trumpest view of the world is with your own worldview.
that points the finger in a different direction and says, actually, the problem, these robber baron oligarchs that he's surrounded himself with, they're the problem. And this is actually a good transition into the next block, because as of right now, most Democrats want to have their cake and eat it too. They want to complain about Elon, which
You know, I'm the first to do, right? Correct. The problem of oligarchy and government, big problem. But you don't get to then still say what we're going to take our money from our billionaires, because those are the quote unquote good billionaires.
And most of these Democrats who are in positions of power, it's not because they had an inspiring vision. It's not because they have a grassroots base, there are few exceptions. It's not because they were like good at delivering for their district. It's because they were good at sucking up to rich people and separating them from their money.
And so the minute you change course on that, the minute many of these people lose what has been their claim to and grip on power. So that's where the rubber is gonna meet the road with regard to the Democratic Party. But I know for many normal Democrats, it has been radicalizing to watch so many of their liberal media figures and liberal political icons just basically lay down in these early days of the Trump administration.
And again, you know, they care about power. That was the way to get it. Now they've got to figure out what's next. I'm so sick of hearing men talk about women's basketball. If only there were a professional WNBA player with her own podcast I could listen to. Hey, this is Lixie Brown, WNBA player and professional yapper. And this is Mariah Rose. You may know me from spilling the tea on Hoops for Hotties on TikTok. And we've got a new podcast full circle.
Every Wednesday, we're catching you up on what's going on in women's basketball, and not just in the WNBA, but with athletes unlimited, unrivaled, and college basketball. We've got you with analysis, insight stories, and a little bit of tea. I know you guys have seen a lot of former and current basketball players telling their stories from their point of view, and I just think it's time for the girlies to tap in.
We want to share all of the women's basketball stories that you won't see anywhere else. Tune in a full circle in iHeartWomen's Sports Production in partnership with Deep Blue Sports and Entertainment. You can find us on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcast, or wherever you get your podcast. Presented by Capital One, founding partner of iHeartWomen's Sports.
Welcome to My Legacy. I'm Martin Luther King III, and together with my wife, Andrea Waters King, and our dear friends, Mark and Craig Kilburger, we explore the personal journeys that shape extraordinary lives. Each week, we'll sit down with inspiring figures like David Oyello, Mel Robbins, Martin Sheen, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and Billy Porter, and their plus one, their ride or die, as they share stories never heard before about their remarkable journey.
Listen to my legacy on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is my legacy.
Hosted by Bobby Bones, the official Yellowstone podcast takes you deeper into the franchise that's captivated millions worldwide. Explore untold behind-the-scenes stories, exclusive cast interviews, and in-depth discussions about the themes and legacy of Yellowstone. You know, the first guns to settle this valley fight was all they knew.
Whether you're a longtime fan or new to the ranch. Welcome to the Yellowstone. Bobby Bones has everything you need to stay connected to the Yellowstone phenomenon. I look forward to it. Listen to the official Yellowstone podcast now on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Let's go to work.
Let's quickly just do this Bill Gates thing just because it is funny and it gets to what you're talking about. Let's go ahead and put this up there on the screen. Bill Gates gave an interview to the Sunday Times where he said a lot of interesting stuff. He said he was very stupid to be caught being with Jeffrey Epstein. Did you hear the operative word there? What was the operative word? It was great to be caught.
with Jeffrey Epstein. Okay. But on Elon, here's what he had to say. He said, he said, it's really insane. He can destabilize the political situations in countries. I think in the U.S. foreigners aren't allowed to give money. Other countries maybe should adopt safeguards to make sure super rich foreigners aren't distorting their elections. The Microsoft founder said he was not at all concerned about influencing politics like Musk. However, he has told friends
He has since donated $50 million to Democratic nominee Kamala Harris. He says, obviously, criticizes him about the AFD and about Nigel Farage in the UK. But he also offers muted praise for Musk. He said, Musk, we can all overreach if someone is super smart and he is, they should think about how they can help out. But this is populist stirring. And what I think is really funny throughout this is Gates trying to square, like you just said, he's got his hatred of Elon.
It doesn't like Elon for being kind of like a cultural trader. But whenever it comes to this idea of influencing politics or world politics, I mean, I don't have to be the first one to tell you that nobody has influenced politics in Africa probably more than any other American than Bill Gates. Through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, I mean, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is basically a private USAID, which doles out more than USAID.
and has influenced malaria, AIDS, or whatever policy vaccination in those countries. You can be fine with that if you think it's good. Some of it's been fine. But you have to also think you're like, dude, you're wielding immense power as a nation state. And then, you know, not to mention the $50 million for Kamala Harris.
That's fine. I don't know if you saw this, but you know, Reid Hoffman is now spending even more money behind the Democratic machine. And there's a hilarious tweet going back to 2016, I'm sure you saw, from Sam Altman being like, we all need to credit Reid Hoffman for spending more money than anybody else to defeat Donald Trump. He's like, what a hero this guy is. I mean, Reid is the biggest single donor I think in the entire Democratic
So, yes, look, Elon and all that, it's extraordinary, right? But if you actually look at the equivalent number, whatever, billionaires, I think that there were either more or like in terms of the overall absolute number who would endorse Kamala Harris or have been giving to them. And, you know, you haven't even seen this because we've been doing the show. Gary Peters, the Senator from Michigan, says he won't run in 26. So who do we all know who lives in Michigan?
you know so senator governor there too well i prefer that to him running for president but no but that's only the stepping stone crystal hill to pull an rfk the senior not junior uh... in terms of running in two years and then immediately you've all or an obama or a jd vance you know this is what these people do so you know you know the amount of money that's behind people it's always crazy and boomers a lot of people
They love to watch him. I mean, I enjoy why he's good at like going on Fox News and like doing the thing. And I do worry that that's going to substitute for like an actual change in action because there are so many liberals who just love to see him be able to like go into lines. And same thing with Gavin Newsom.
which I get, but you're going to need something more than that if you're actually going to make a material difference in people's lives and be able to fight back against this, you know, the right-wing Trumpist movement. You know, just going back to Bill Gates here for a second. There's the pieces you mentioned. Also, we spent a lot of time covering on rising the way that he was so influential.
in shaping the COVID vaccine response and making it so that it was controlled by these private big pharma companies because he's a big believer in patents rather than making it widely available and a public good so that the entire world could benefit from it and not just originally, primarily the developed world,
So even on that was very influential. And then to hold up the US model of campaign finance, like it's anything to be emulated is fricking insane, right? It's insane. Yes, we do bar foreigners from contributing. That is the one good thing you can say about it. But there is no way in hell that we should have the system that we have where Bill Gates can give 50 million or Elon Musk can give a quarter of a billion, probably more, in order to elect their favored
candidate. That is crazy. And I can tell you all day long, which is true, that a Kamala had a larger number of billionaires who endorsed her. Trump had a larger concentration of a handful, was like three billionaires who gave them something like half a billion dollars. So that's why they've ended up with such extraordinary power, Elon, in particular, Mary Madison as well, in this administration. So I can tell you how this is
different in terms of the scale but anyone can look and say well what about Bill Gates well what about George Soros well what about Reid Hoffman and how much does my little like parsing of oh but technically they didn't give as much as this one right no one cares because they also had way too much power way too much influence shape everything about the democratic party in terms of what policies they're really going to fight for what they're really going to pursue who's going to be in their administration what those priorities are ultimately going to be
So Democrats, if you actually want to have a compelling political alternative to Trumpism, you have to reject all, there are no good billionaires. You have to reject it all. You have to do it aggressively. It has to be clear.
what side you are actually on. And, you know, there is a lot of polling out there that the Achilles heel of this Trump administration is how much influence these billionaires have. People hate it, right?
Approval rating has fallen off a cliff. He's dramatically unpopular now. That was not the case in the past. They are really skeptical of even Doge, which I'm surprised at because just the like, oh, government efficiency, like that sounds good. But because it's seen as this billionaire project, a lot of skepticism, you only have 12% of Americans who say they like the idea of billionaires advising government, right? To me, this is the potential Achilles heel for this administration. But if you're out there,
still, you know, in league with Bill Gates and Reid Hoffman, and that is the center of gravity in your party, and you are not willing to make a clean, clear break with them. Then all of your complaints about that are going to fall on deaf ears, and you will be seen as hypocrites. And I've mentioned this several times, but I think it is so emblematic. The lead candidate for DNC chair right now, Ken Martin,
I'm sure has other things to recommend him. I know people like him know him whatever. I don't know anything about him other than he ran a state party. Okay. And when he got asked about money in politics, he said, of course, we're going to continue to take money from good billionaires, good billionaires.
And who's one of the leading candidates to become the nominee in 2028? J.B. Pritzker, who bragged on the DNC stage that he was an actual billionaire. You know, I mean, that's another one which drives me crazy. It's like, did you need to earn it? You're an heir. Is there anything more grotesque in the American tradition than the billionaire heir?
It's a universally despised person. He could pull a page from the Trumpian playbook where, you know, first I was like, well, I'm a billionaire, so I don't need these people's money. He could pull that page. But I mean, he is... But he hasn't governed that. No, he hasn't. He's done a decent job. I don't know enough to lay out all of his track record, but I know he's done some things that were positive in the state and in some ways been, you know, in certain instances a class trader, but he is not
He is not. You really need an outsider. You do. Because all of these other people are too infected in the way things are currently in the Democratic Party and their current way of thinking and their current power structures, et cetera. So in any case, Bill Gates, you're right about Elon Musk, but you need to look in the mirror, buddy. You need to look in the mirror. Well, I don't think that's going to be happening. All right. Thank you guys so much for joining us. We really appreciate it. It's a great counterpoint show for everyone tomorrow, and we will see you all on Thursday.
Experiencing the news each day can feel like a journey. With Up First from NPR, though, it doesn't have to be. Welcome to 15 easy minutes of breaking news, clarity on international and national affairs, and a casual tone that you can take in with breakfast. Begin your day informed, ready, and refreshed. Begin your day with Up First. Subscribe to Up First from NPR on the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts.
Hey, it's Alec Baldwin. This past season on my podcast, Here's the Thing. I spoke with more actors, musicians, policymakers, and so many other fascinating people, like writer and actor Dan Aykroyd. I love writing more than anything. You're left alone, you know, you do three hours in the morning, you write three hours in the afternoon, go pick up a kid from school, then write at night, and after nine hours, you come out with seven pages, and then you're moving on.
Listen to Here's the Thing on the iHeartRadio app Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. Welcome to My Legacy. I'm Martin Luther King III, and together with my wife, Andrea Waters King and our dear friends, Mark and Craig Kilburger, we explore the personal journeys that shape extraordinary lives.
Join us for heartfelt conversations with remarkable guests like David Oyeloho, Mel Robbins, Martin Sheen, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, and Billy Porter. Listen to my legacy on the iHeartRadio app. Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts. This is my legacy.
Was this transcript helpful?
Recent Episodes
2/3/25: Trump Smacks Canada & Mexico With Tariffs, Elon Musk DOGE Gov Takeover

Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Krystal and Saagar discuss Trump smacking Canada and Mexico with sweeping tariffs, Elon Musk DOGE government takeover. Amir Tibon: https://www.haaretz.com/ty-WRITER/0000017f-da25-d42c-afff-dff77f020000 Jeff Stein: https://www.washingtonpost.com/people/jeff-stein/ To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show AD FREE, uncut and 1 hour early visit: www.breakingpoints.com Merch Store: https://shop.breakingpoints.com/See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
February 03, 2025
1/30/25: DCA Plane Crash, RFK Confirmation, Trump UFO Coverup, Medicaid Chaos & MORE!

Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Discussion on DCA plane crash, RFK Jr's confirmation hearing, hawkish reaction to Tulsi/Snowden support, Trump backing down on Medicaid chaos, UFO coverup accusations by Jeremy Corbell, and Jewish author criticizing ADL for whitewashing Elon salute.
January 30, 2025
1/29/25: Trump Funding Freeze Blocked By Judge, Stephen Miller Spars With Tapper, Charlamagne Confronts Vivek On DOGE Exile, US Romania Coup, Trump Envoy In Gaza

Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Trump funding freeze blocked by judge, Stephen Miller spars with Tapper on deportation, Charlamagne calls out Vivek on DOGE exile, a CNN liberal resistance anchor is pushed out, U.S. involved in Romania coup rumors, Trump envoy visits Gaza.
January 29, 2025
1/28/25: Nvidia Stock Collapse Amid DeepSeek AI, Jamie Dimon Says Get Over Inflation, Egg Prices Skyrocket

Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar
Krystal and Saagar discuss Nvidia's collapse, Jamie Dimon's comment on inflation, and rising egg prices.
January 28, 2025

Ask this episodeAI Anything

Hi! You're chatting with Breaking Points with Krystal and Saagar AI.
I can answer your questions from this episode and play episode clips relevant to your question.
You can ask a direct question or get started with below questions -
What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?
Sign In to save message history